Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

Congressional research reportAug 11, 2020

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones:

Overview and Issues for Congress

Updated August 11, 2020

Congressional Research Service

https://crsreports.congress.gov

R46416

SUMMARY

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones:

Overview and Issues for Congress

Timely tropical cyclone forecasts can provide early and accurate warnings to parts of the

R46416

August 11, 2020

Eva Lipiec

Analyst in Natural

Resources Policy

U.S. coastline vulnerable to tropical cyclone impacts. Recent hurricane seasons have

included several major hurricanes—such as Dorian in 2019 and Florence, Lane,

Michael, and Olivia in 2018—which resulted in multiple deaths and billions of dollars

of damage in the southeastern United States and Hawaii, among other places. The

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is the federal agency responsible for tropical cyclone

forecasts, including track, intensity, storm surge, and rainfall forecasts. NOAA defines tropical cyclones as

tropical depressions, tropical storms, hurricanes, and major hurricanes, and the agency makes tropical cyclone

forecasts using data from multiple observational tools—satellites, reconnaissance aircraft, ships, radar, and buoys,

among others.

Each year, NOAA releases outlooks for three ocean regions—Atlantic, eastern Pacific, and central Pacific.

Although the outlooks typically cover all types of tropical cyclones, the agency uses the term “hurricane” in the

outlook title. The north Atlantic and eastern Pacific outlooks include the predicted number of named storms (with

winds 39 miles per hour or greater), hurricanes, and major hurricanes. The central Pacific outlook forecasts the

total number of tropical cyclones expected.

In May 2020, NOAA released its 2020 hurricane season outlooks for the Atlantic, eastern Pacific, and central

Pacific regions. NOAA predicted an above-normal season in the Atlantic, with 13 to 19 named storms, 6 to 10

hurricanes, and 3 to 6 major hurricanes. (Some nonfederal entities predicted a near-normal to above-normal

Atlantic hurricane season.) In August 2020, NOAA updated its Atlantic outlook, calling for 19 to 25 named

storms, 7 to 11 hurricanes, and 3 to 6 major hurricanes. In its May outlook, the agency anticipated that the eastern

and central Pacific regions would most likely experience a near-normal season. The forecasts included 11 to 18

named storms, 5 to 10 hurricanes, and 1 to 5 major hurricanes in the eastern Pacific and between 2 and 6 tropical

cyclones in the central Pacific. The agency does not release an updated outlook for the eastern and central Pacific

regions.

In 2017, Congress enacted the Weather Research and Forecasting Act (P.L. 115-25), which included provisions

regarding hurricane forecasting and warnings. Members of Congress continue to be interested in the potential

impacts of climate change on tropical cyclones and the challenges in accurately forecasting certain aspects—such

as intensity, storm surge, and precipitation—of tropical cyclones. Some Members also may consider potential

impacts on tropical cyclone forecasting due to shifts in the NOAA’s and private sector’s roles in the weather

enterprise. Some stakeholders advocate for retaining the current distribution of responsibilities; other stakeholders

believe changes in responsibility are already occurring and should, in some cases, continue or expand. Members

also may continue to consider the potential for interference from fifth-generation telecommunications (5G)

technology on NOAA and other federal satellite sensors. For instance, some stakeholders have argued that

interference could impact the quality of data used for hurricane forecasting, among other activities. Others have

rejected interference claims altogether, among other views.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

Contents

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones .......................................................................................... 1

Collecting Data ......................................................................................................... 2

Analyzing the Data .................................................................................................... 3

Forecasts and Warnings .............................................................................................. 4

NOAA’s Seasonal Hurricane Outlooks ............................................................................... 6

2020 Hurricane Season Outlooks ................................................................................. 7

Issues for Congress ......................................................................................................... 9

Impacts of Climate Change on Tropical Cyclones ........................................................... 9

Forecasting Certain Aspects of Tropical Cyclones......................................................... 10

NOAA Interactions with the Private Sector Weather Enterprise....................................... 14

Potential 5G Technology Interference with Satellite Sensors........................................... 17

NOAA’s Use of the 23.8 Gigahertz Frequency........................................................ 17

Federal Frequency Management ........................................................................... 18

NOAA and Other Stakeholder Concerns—Selected Timeline .................................... 18

Figures

Figure 1. 96 Hour Track Error vs. Consistency .................................................................... 4

Figure 2. Storm Surge and Storm Tide................................................................................ 6

Figure 3. NHC Official Average Track Errors Comparison .................................................. 11

Figure 4. NHC Official Average Intensity Errors Comparison .............................................. 12

Figure A-1. Hurricane Dorian’s Track .............................................................................. 26

Figure A-2. Hurricane Humberto’s Track.......................................................................... 28

Figure A-3. Hurricane Lorenzo’s Track ............................................................................ 30

Figure B-1. Hurricane Florence’s Track............................................................................ 34

Figure B-2. Hurricane Michael’s Track............................................................................. 37

Figure B-3. Hurricane Lane’s Track ................................................................................. 41

Figure B-4. Hurricane Olivia’s Track ............................................................................... 43

Tables

Table 1. Seasonal Means and Ranges for Atlantic Named Storms ........................................... 7

Table 2. Seasonal Means for Eastern Pacific Named Storms .................................................. 7

Table 3. 2020 Atlantic Hurricane Season Seasonal Outlooks .................................................. 8

Table 4. 2020 Eastern Pacific Hurricane Season Seasonal Outlook.......................................... 9

Table A-1. 2019 Atlantic Hurricane Season: Comparison Between Seasonal Outlook and

Actual Storms ............................................................................................................ 23

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

Table A-2. NHC Official Track Forecast Errors for Hurricane Dorian Compared with the

2014-2018 Average..................................................................................................... 26

Table A-3. NHC Official Intensity Forecast Errors for Hurricane Dorian Compared with

the 2014-2018 Average................................................................................................ 27

Table A-4. NHC Official Track Forecast Errors for Hurricane Humberto Compared with

the 2014-2018 Average................................................................................................ 29

Table A-5. NHC Official Intensity Forecast Errors for Hurricane Humberto Compared

with the 2014-2018 Average......................................................................................... 29

Table A-6. NHC Official Track Forecast Errors for Hurricane Lorenzo Compared with the

2014-2018 Average..................................................................................................... 31

Table A-7. NHC Official Intensity Forecast Errors for Hurricane Lorenzo Compared with

the 2014-2018 Average................................................................................................ 31

Table A-8. 2019 Eastern Pacific Hurricane Season: Comparison Between Seasonal

Outlook and Actual Storms .......................................................................................... 32

Table B-1. 2018 Atlantic Hurricane Season: Comparison Between Seasonal Outlook and

Actual Storms ............................................................................................................ 33

Table B-2. NHC Official Track Forecast Errors for Hurricane Florence Compared with

the 2013-2017 Average................................................................................................ 35

Table B-3. NHC Official Intensity Forecast Errors for Hurricane Florence Compared with

the 2013-2017 Average................................................................................................ 35

Table B-4. NHC Official Track Forecast Errors for Hurricane Michael Compared with the

2013-2017 Average..................................................................................................... 38

Table B-5. NHC Official Intensity Forecast Errors for Hurricane Michael Compared with

the 2013-2017 Average................................................................................................ 38

Table B-6. 2018 Eastern Pacific Hurricane Season: Comparison Between Seasonal

Outlook and Actual Storms .......................................................................................... 39

Table B-7. NHC Official Track Forecast Errors for Hurricane Lane Compared with the

2013-2017 Average..................................................................................................... 41

Table B-8. NHC Official Intensity Forecast Errors for Hurricane Lane Compared with the

2013-2017 Average..................................................................................................... 42

Table B-9. NHC Official Track Forecast Errors for Hurricane Olivia Compared with the

2013-2017 Average..................................................................................................... 44

Table B-10. NHC Official Intensity Forecast Errors for Hurricane Olivia Compared with

the 2013-2017 Average................................................................................................ 44

Table B-11. 2018 Central Pacific Tropical Cyclone Season:

Comparison Between Seasonal Outlook and Actual Storms .............................................. 45

Appendixes

Appendix A. 2019 Hurricane Season Outlooks and Overviews ............................................. 23

Appendix B. 2018 Hurricane Season Outlooks and Overviews ............................................. 33

Contacts

Author Information ....................................................................................................... 45

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

he potential for widespread destruction to parts of the U.S. coastline underscores the value

of timely hurricane—or more broadly, tropical cyclone—forecasts as a means for

providing early and accurate warnings to affected communities. The National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is the federal agency responsible for tropical cyclone

forecasting, including track, intensity, storm surge, and rainfall forecasts. The agency reports on

how accurate the forecasts are compared with the actual events, calculates damages, and more.

A variety of terms can be used to describe these types of storms (see text box below). This report

uses the terms storm and tropical cyclone and provides a description of how NOAA’s National

Hurricane Center (NHC) forecasts tropical cyclone tracks, intensities, and effects. The report also

discusses potential issues for Congress, including challenges with tracking and forecasting

tropical cyclones and the potential impacts of climate change on tropical cyclones . The report

then provides an overview of forecasts for the 2020 hurricane season. The report includes two

appendices (Appendix A and Appendix B) with information about the 2019 and 2018 hurricane

seasons.

Tropical Cyclones, Storms, and Hurricanes

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) defines a tropical cyclone as a “rotating, organized

system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or subtropical waters and has a closed low -level

circulation.” Cyclones rotate counterclockwise in the Northern Hemisphere and clockwise in the Southern

Hemisphere. Tropical cyclones that form between 5 o and 30 o North latitude typically move westward. According

to NOAA, tropical cyclones include the following:



Tropical Depression—a tropical cyclone with maximum sustained winds of 38 miles per hour (mph) or less.



Tropical Storm—a tropical cyclone with maximum sustained winds of 39 to 73 mph.



Hurricane—a tropical cyclone with maximum sustained winds of 74 mph or higher. Hurricanes are called

typhoons in the western North Pacific Ocean and cyclones in the Indian Ocean and South Pacific Ocean.



Major Hurricane—a tropical cyclone with maximum sustained winds of 111 mph or higher, corresponding to

a category 3, 4, or 5 on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale.

Source: National Hurricane Center, “Tropical Cyclone Climatology,” at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/climo/.

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones

NHC, part of NOAA’s National Weather Service (NWS), is responsible for forecasting tropical

cyclones, including hurricanes in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. 1 NHC provides estimates of the

path or track, intensity or wind speed, size, and structure of the storm, as well as predictions of

storm surge, precipitation, and tornadoes associated with these storms.2 NOAA may use this

information to issue a hurricane watch or a hurricane warning and public advisories. 3

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Hurricane Center (NHC), “About the National

Hurricane Center,” at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/aboutintro.shtml.

University of Rhode Island Graduate School of Oceanography (URI GSO), “ National Hurricane Center Forecast

Process,” at http://www.hurricanescience.org/science/forecast/forecasting/forecastprocess/. Hereafter URI GSO,

“National Hurricane Center Forecast Process.”

3 A hurricane watch is an announcement that hurricane conditions—sustained winds 74 miles per hour (mph) or

greater—are possible within a specified coastal area, usually issued 48 hours in advance of the onset of tropical storm

force winds. A hurricane warning is issued when hurricane conditions are expected somewhere within the specified

coastal area. URI GSO, “National Hurricane Center Forecast Process.”

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

Collecting Data

Storm forecasts involve many components and use a broad array of resources and capabilities

within NOAA and NWS, all of which are coordinated and interpreted by NHC. 4 The process

begins with observations; satellites, aircraft, ships, buoys, radar, and other sources provide data

used to create storm-track and intensity predictions. Most Atlantic hurricanes, for example, begin

to form west of Africa over the ocean. 5 NOAA weather satellites, including two Geostationary

Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES; known as GOES-East and GOES-West) and polarorbiting weather satellites, provide remote-sensing observations in the Atlantic and Pacific

basins. 6

NOAA and U.S. Air Force aircraft, known as “Hurricane Hunters,” fly directly into and above the

storm to collect real-time data if a tropical cyclone is judged to pose a threat to the U.S.

coastline. 7 The Chief, Aerial Reconnaissance Coordination, All Hurricanes (CARCAH) unit

coordinates all tropical cyclone operation reconnaissance in accordance with the National

Hurricane Operations Plan. 8 Data collected from the Hurricane Hunters and other aircraft (e.g.,

the National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NASA] Global Hawk) are checked at the

CARCAH and provided to NHC forecasters. 9 Land-based radars begin to provide NHC with

precipitation and wind-velocity data once the storm is approximately 280 miles from the coast.

Automated Surface Observation Systems instruments provide additional ground-based

measurements when the storm is close to shore or makes landfall. 10 Information from other

systems, such as ships and buoys, is also included in forecasts.

Although the entire federal hurricane forecast effort is broader than NOAA, this report focuses on NHC’s. T he

National Hurricane Operations Plan outlines various agency responsibilities across the federal government. See Office

of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology (OFCM), National Hurricane Plan, at https://www.ofcm.gov/publications/

nhop/nhop2.htm. Hereafter OFCM, National Hurricane Operations Plan.

5 For more information about why hurricanes may threaten the U.S. East Coast and not the U.S. West Coast, see “Why

Do Hurricanes Hit the East Coast of the U.S. but Never the West Coast?,” Scientific American, October 21, 1999, at

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-do-hurricanes-hit-the-east-coast-of-the-u-s-but-never-the-west-coast/.

URI GSO, “National Hurricane Center Forecast Process.” Generally, Geostationary Operational Environmental

Satellite-West (GOES-West) covers the east and central Pacific Ocean and GOES-East covers most of the Atlantic

Ocean. T he Japanese Himawari 8 satellite covers the west and central Pacific Ocean, and the Japan Meteorological

Agency shares the satellite’s images with NOAA and the public. URI GSO, “Geostationary Satellites,” at

http://www.hurricanescience.org/science/observation/satellites/geostationary/; email correspondence with NOAA

Office of Legislative Affairs, January 24, 2020; and NOAA, “Full Disk: Himawari-8,” at https://www.goes.noaa.gov/

f_himawari-8.html.

NOAA Hurricane Hunters are specially equipped aircraft that collect data during hurricanes. T he NOAA fleet

includes two Lockheed WP-3D Orion four-engine turboprop aircraft and one Gulfstream IV-SP jet aircraft. T he WP-3D

aircraft fly directly into hurricanes during the storms and collect in -situ data on winds and atmospheric pressures,

among other measurements. T he IV-SP jet flies at higher altitudes and collects critical information on the “steering”

winds that affect the hurricane track, among other data. NOAA, Office of Marine and Aviation Operations, “ NOAA

Hurricane Hunters,” at https://www.omao.noaa.gov/learn/aircraft-operations/about/hurricane-hunters. T he 53 rd Weather

Reconnaissance Squadron, a component of the 403 rd Wing of the U.S. Air Force located at Keesler Air Force Base in

Biloxi, MS, flies 10 WC-130J Hercules aircraft into hurricanes during weather reconnaissance missions. 403 rd Wing,

“53 rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron ‘Hurricane Hunters,’” at http://www.403wg.afrc.af.mil/About/Fact-Sheets/

Display/Article/192529/53rd-weather-reconnaissance-squadron-hurricane-hunters/.

8 T he Chief, Aerial Reconnaissance Coordination, All Hurricanes (CARCAH) is a subunit of the 53 rd Weather

Reconnaissance Squadron, U.S. Air Force. OFCM, National Hurricane Operations Plan.

National Aeronautics and Space Administrat ion (NASA), Armstrong Flight Research Center, “ Global Hawk,” at

https://www.nasa.gov/centers/armstrong/aircraft/GlobalHawk/index.html.

10 URI GSO, “ Automated Surface Observation Systems (ASOS),” at http://www.hurricanescience.org/science/

observation/landbased/automatedsurfaceobssystems/.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

Analyzing the Data

NHC gathers observational data as a tropical cyclone approaches the U.S. coastline and uses the

data to generate a series of forecast computer model simulations. 11 Tropical cyclone forecast

model simulations typically predict the track (the path) and intensity (the wind speeds) over a

period of three to five days. 12 Available observational data provide a baseline for the model,

which then uses mathematical equations to produce forecasts.

Tropical cyclone forecast models vary. They may differ in how they process information, such as

when observations are fed into the model, which equations they use, how they make forecasts

from the solutions to the equations, and other factors. These differences explain why NHC

forecasts may differ from those of other countries or institutions (e.g., the European Center for

Medium-Range Forecasts produces Atlantic forecasts, as do some research institutions within the

United States, such as the National Center for Atmospheric Research). 13

NHC forecasters analyze the model results and use their experience and expertise to adjust model

forecasts. NHC measures forecast skill by comparing the adjusted forecasts, model-only forecasts,

and a baseline forecast. 14 For example, NHC-adjusted forecasts of Atlantic tropical cyclone tracks

at the 96-hour mark have been more accurate than specific model-only forecasts for the last three

years (Figure 1). 15 NHC-adjusted forecasts have also been more consistent than model-only

forecasts in the last three years, meaning the NHC forecast “holds steady more than the models”

between predictions made every 12 hours, avoiding large track shifts or storm speed changes

(Figure 1). 16

11 URI GSO, “ Hurricane Forecast Models,” at http://www.hurricanescience.org/science/forecast/models/. Hereafter

URI GSO, “ Hurricane Forecast Models.”

12 Hurricane intensity generally is measured as highest sustained wind speeds. However, that measurement does not

take into consideration the storm-surge or precipitation-caused flooding, both of which may be among the most

dangerous elements of a hurricane.

13 T he European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) is an independent, intergovernmental

organization supported by 34 countries. It produces global numerical weather forecasts using weather models.

ECMWF, “Advancing Global NWP T hrough International Collaboration,” at https://www.ecmwf.int/; and URI GSO,

“ Hurricane Forecast Models.”

According to NOAA, the baseline model “makes forecasts based on a combination of what past storms with similar

characteristics—like location, intensity, forward speed, and the time of year—have done ... and a continuation of what

the current storm has been doing.... T his model contains no information about the current state of the atmosphere and

represents a ‘no-skill’ level of accuracy.” NOAA, “Skill or Luck? How NHC’s Hurricane T rack Forecasts Beat the

Models,” April 9, 2020, at https://noaanhc.wordpress.com/2020/04/09/skill-or-luck-how-nhcs-hurricane-trackforecasts-beat-the-models/. Hereafter NOAA, “Skill or Luck?”

15 NOAA, “Skill or Luck?”

16 NOAA, “Skill or Luck?”

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

Figure 1. 96 Hour Track Error vs. Consistency

2017-2019 in the Atlantic basin

Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), “Skill or Luck? How NHC’s Hurricane

Track Forecasts Beat the Models,” April 9, 2020, at https://noaanhc.wordpress.com/2020/04/09/skill-or-luckhow-nhcs-hurricane-track-forecasts-beat-the-models/.

Notes: n mi = nautical miles; ECMWF = European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts, GFS = U.S.

Global Forecast System, NHC = National Hurricane Center, UKMET = United Kingdom Meteorological Office

model.

According to NOAA, these three models are “the three best individual track models.”

Forecasts and Warnings

The NWS, as delegated by the Secretary of Commerce, has statutory authority for weather

forecasting and for issuing storm warnings.17 Using the results from hurricane forecast models,

different components inside and outside of NHC contribute to the hurricane forecast process.

These components include the Hurricane Specialist Unit (HSU), the Tropical Analysis and

Forecast Branch (TAFB), and the Hurricane Liaison Team (HLT). 18 Of these, the HSU produces

17 15 U.S.C. §313.

18 T he T ropical Analysis and Forecast Branch (T AFB) and Hurricane Specialist Unit (HSU) are within NHC; the

Hurricane Liaison T eam (HLT ) is within the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). HLT is comprised of

federal, state, and local emergency managers, FEMA personnel, and National Weather Service (NWS) f orecasters and

hydrologists. On or before the beginning of hurricane season, the NHC director is to request that FEMA activate HLT ,

which remains active throughout the hurricane season. If a tropical cyclone in the Atlantic or eastern Pacific basin

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

the final, official public forecast products, issued every six hours after a storm forms and more

frequently if a hurricane watch or hurricane warning is issued. 19 The HSU also provides briefings

on tropical storms to emergency managers and to the public, and it cooperates with

meteorological services in other countries (e.g., Mexico). The TAFB supports the HSU by

providing tropical cyclone position and intensity estimates, conducting media interviews, and

assisting in tropical cyclone operations. 20

Forecasts and warnings generally are coordinated between the NWS national centers and the local

forecast offices. When NHC issues its forecast, local NWS Weather Forecast Offices use the

information for their own forecasts, which take into consideration local conditions , and help

disseminate the forecast through established local networks.

Other forecast models are designed specifically to forecast storm surge. The NHC Storm Surge

Unit models and predicts storm-surge vulnerability over the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf Coasts,

Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Bahamas. 21 Storm surge is defined as an

abnormal rise in sea level generated by a storm, above the predicted astronomical tide. 22 It

generally refers to the difference between the measured level of the sea surface during the storm

compared with what the sea level would have been without a storm (Figure 2). Storm surge can

combine with other factors to create significant flood conditions, such as when it combines with

extreme precipitation or the astronomical high tide (also known as a storm tide, Figure 2). 23 For

example, Superstorm Sandy’s landfall coincided with an astronomical high tide, which produced

a storm tide that inundated the coastline of New Jersey and New York. 24

threatens the United States or its territories, NHC can request that NWS meteorologists or hydrologists be assigned to

HLT until the storm threat has passed. One of HLT ’s main functions is to communicate the threat level to federal, state,

and local officials. Neither HLT nor NHC assumes responsibility for issuing evacuations; state or local officials are

responsible for those decisions. NOAA NHC, “About the National Hurricane Center,” at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/

aboutintro.shtml; and NOAA NWS, National Weather Service Instruction 10-603, September 21, 2016, at

http://www.nws.noaa.gov/directives/sym/pd01006003curr.pdf.

19 For more on hurricane watches and hurricane warnings, see footnote 3.

20 URI GSO, “National Hurricane Center Forecast Process.”

21 NOAA NHC, “ Storm Surge Unit,” at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/surge/ssu.php.

22 NOAA NHC, “Storm Surge Overview,” at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/surge/. Hereafter NOAA, “Store Surge

Overview.”

NOAA, “Store Surge Overview.”

24 Eric S. Blake et al., National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report – Hurricane Sandy, February 12, 2013, at

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL182012_Sandy.pdf.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

Figure 2. Storm Surge and Storm Tide

Source: National Hurricane Center, “Storm Surge Overview,” at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/surge/. (Modified by

CRS.)

Note: The 17-foot storm tide (top arrow) indicates the sum of the 2-foot normal astronomical high tide and the

15-foot storm surge.

NOAA’s Seasonal Hurricane Outlooks25

NOAA releases its seasonal outlooks for the Atlantic, eastern Pacific, and central Pacific prior to

the start of each respective hurricane season.26 The Atlantic and central Pacific hurricane seasons

each run from June 1 to November 30, and the eastern Pacific hurricane season runs from May 15

through November 30; however, tropical cyclones may form outside of these time frames.27

NOAA typically provides an update to the Atlantic outlook in August of each year but does not do

so for the Pacific regions. NOAA includes several disclaimers when issuing its seasonal hurricane

outlook. For example, NOAA does not make a seasonal hurricane landfall forecast, and it does

not predict levels of hurricane activity for any particular area. 28

NOAA provides information about seasonal means and ranges for Atlantic named storms (Table

1) and seasonal means for eastern Pacific named storms (Table 2). 29 For the central Pacific

Ocean, a shorter observational record of hurricanes and major hurricanes limits the statistical

25 NOAA’s outlooks typically cover all types of tropical cyclones, but the agency uses the term “hurricane” in outlook

titles.

26 NOAA, NWS Climate Prediction Center (CPC), “Expert Assessments,” at https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/

expert_assessment/. T he Eastern Pacific hurricane region covers the eastern Pacific Ocean east of 140 oW north of the

equator, and the Central Pacific hurricane region cov ers the areas between 140 oW and 180 o.

According to NOAA, “ When the Weather Bureau organized its new hurricane warning network in 1935 it scheduled

a special telegraph line to connect the various centers to run from June 15 th through November 15 th. T hose remained the

start and end dates of the ‘official’ season until 1965, when it was decided to start at the beginning of the month of June

and run until the end of November.” NOAA Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory

NOAA, NWS CPC, “NOAA 2020 Atlantic Hurricane Season Outlook,” press release, May 21, 2020, at

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/outlooks/hurricane.shtml. Hereafter NOAA 2020 Atlantic Hurricane Season

Outlook, May 2020

29 NOAA typically names a storm once it reaches tropical storm strength (e.g., sustained winds of 39 or more mph).

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

information available. NOAA uses available information to predict that four to five tropical

cyclones, on average, develop or move across the central Pacific region each year. 30

Table 1. Seasonal Means and Ranges for Atlantic Named Storms

1981-2010

Mean

Number of

Named

Storms

Range of

Named

Storms

Mean

Number of

Hurricanes

Above

Normal

16.5

12-28

Near

Normal

12.3

Below

Normal

All Seasons

Season

Type

Range of

Hurricanes

Mean

Number of

Major

Hurricanes

Range of

Major

Hurricanes

9.7

7-15

4.8

3-7

10-15

6.3

4-9

2.3

1-4

6.7

4-9

3.3

2-4

1.0

0-2

12.1

4-28

6.4

2-15

2.7

0-7

Sources: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Weather Service, Climate

Prediction Center, “Background Information: North Atlantic Hurricane Season,” at

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/outlooks/archives/hurricane2017/August/NorATL_Background.shtml;

and email correspondence with NOAA Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs, May 14, 2020.

Notes: According to NOAA, climatological averages for weather data are typically computed over a 30 -year

time period (currently 1981-2010). The 30-year averages are updated every 10 years. The next update is

expected to occur after the 2020 season.

NOAA typically names a storm once it reaches tropical storm strength (e.g., sustained winds of 39 or more

miles per hour).

Table 2. Seasonal Means for Eastern Pacific Named Storms

1981-2010

Season Type

All Seasons

Mean Number of

Named Storms

Mean Number of

Hurricanes

Mean Number of

Major Hurricanes

Source: Email correspondence with NOAA, Office of Legislative Affairs, May 14, 2020.

Notes: According to NOAA, climatological averages for weather data are typically computed over a 30 -year

time period (currently 1981-2010). The 30-year averages are updated every 10 years. The next update is

expected to occur after the 2020 season.

2020 Hurricane Season Outlooks

NOAA issued its initial 2020 Atlantic hurricane season outlook in May 2020 (Table 3) and

indicated that an above-normal season had the highest chance (60%) of occurring. 31 In August,

the agency updated its outlook and indicated that the likelihood of an above-normal season has

increased to 85%. 32

Email correspondence with NOAA Office of Legislative Affairs, January 24, 2020.

31 NOAA 2020 Atlantic Hurricane Season Outlook, May 2020.

32 NOAA, “‘Extremely active’ hurricane season possible for Atlantic Basin,” August 6, 2020, at https://www.noaa.gov/

media-release/extremely-active-hurricane-season-possible-for-atlantic-basin.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

Table 3. 2020 Atlantic Hurricane Season Seasonal Outlooks

NOAA Seasonal Outlook

(May 2020)

NOAA Seasonal Outlook

(August 2020)

Actual

Named Storms: 13-19

Named Storms: 19-25

Named Storms: NA

Hurricanes: 6-10

Hurricanes: 7-11

Hurricanes: NA

Major Hurricanes: 3-6

Major Hurricanes: NA

Source: NOAA, “Busy Atlantic hurricane season predicted for 2020,” May 21, 2020, at https://www.noaa.gov/

media-release/busy-atlantic-hurricane-season-predicted-for-2020; and NOAA, “‘Extremely active’ hurricane

season possible for Atlantic Basin,” August 6, 2020, at https://www.noaa.gov/media-release/extremely-activehurricane-season-possible-for-atlantic-basin.

Notes: NA = not available.

For comparison, the 1981 to 2010 seasonal averages include 12 named storms, 6 hurricanes, and

3 major hurricanes. 33 For the sixth year in a row, a tropical cyclone formed before the June 1 start

of the hurricane season—Tropical Storm Arthur formed on May 16, 2020, and Tropical Storm

Bertha formed on May 27, 2020. 34

Several nonfederal entities also have published their outlooks for the season. For example, the

private weather forecasting company AccuWeather published its 2020 Atlantic hurricane outlook

in March 2020, predicting 14 to 18 named storms, 7 to 9 hurricanes, and 2 to 4 major

hurricanes. 35 Accuweather released an updated outlook in May, predicting 14 to 20 named storms,

7 to 11 hurricanes, and 4 to 6 major hurricanes. 36 The Department of Atmospheric Science at

Colorado State University (CSU) issued its forecast in early April 2020. CSU predicted abovenormal activity, with 16 named storms, 8 hurricanes, and 4 major hurricanes in the Atlantic. 37

CSU has released several updates, the most recent in August, which predicted 24 named storms,

12 hurricanes, and 5 major hurricanes. 38 In late April 2020, the Penn State Earth System Science

Center released its 2020 forecast, predicting 15 to 24 named storms.39 All three forecasts rely, in

part, on information collected and shared by NOAA.

33 According to NOAA, climatological averages for weather data are typically computed over a 30 -year time period

(currently 1981 to 2010). T he 30-year averages are updated every 10 years, with the next update expected to occur after

the 2020 season. Email correspondence with NOAA Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs, May 14,

2020.

34 NHC, “Arthur Graphics Archive,” at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2020/ART HUR_graphics.php; and NHC,

“Bertha Graphics Archive,” at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2020/BERT HA_graphics.php.

35 Jillian MacMath, “AccuWeather’s 2020 Atlantic hurricane season forecast is out,” AccuWeather, March 25, 2020, at

https://www.accuweather.com/en/hurricane/accuweathers-2020-atlantic-hurricane-season-forecast/705233.

AccuWeather’s forecast also estimated two to four “high-impact storms affecting the United States.”

36 John Roach, “AccuWeather increases number of hurricanes predicted for ‘very active’ 2020 Atlantic season,”

AccuWeather, May 25, 2020, at https://www.accuweather.com/en/hurricane/accuweather-issues-2020-atlantichurricane-season-forecast-update/735844.

Phil Klotzbach et al., “Extended range forecast of Atlantic seasonal hurricane activity and landfall strike probability

for 2020,” April 2, 2020, at https://tropical.colostate.edu/media/sites/111/2020/04/2020-04.pdf. Unlike the NOAA

hurricane forecasts, Klotzbach, et al.’s outlook includes an estimate of landfall probability —for 2020 the researchers

predict an above-average probability for major hurricanes to make landfall along the conterminous United States and

the Caribbean.

38 Philip J. Klotzbach, Michael M. Bell, and Jhordanne Jones, Forecast of Atlantic Seasonal Hurricane Activity and

Landfall Strike Probability for 2020, Colorado State University Department of Atmospheric Science, August 2020, at

https://tropical.colostate.edu/Forecast/2020-08.pdf.

39 Penn State Earth System Science Center, “T he 2020 North Atlantic Hurricane Season: Penn State ESSC Forecast,”

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

NOAA also released its 2020 outlooks for the eastern and central Pacific hurricane seasons in

May 2020. 40 NOAA anticipated that both basins would most likely experience a near-normal

(40% chance of occurring) to a below-normal (35%) season, with an above-normal season less

likely to occur (25%). 41 See Table 4 for the eastern Pacific outlook. NOAA predicted the central

Pacific would experience two to six tropical cyclones. NOAA does not publish updates to its

eastern and central Pacific region outlooks. On average, the eastern Pacific basin experiences 15

named storms, 8 hurricanes, and 4 major hurricanes each year, and the central Pacific averages 4

to 5 tropical cyclones each year.

Table 4. 2020 Eastern Pacific Hurricane Season Seasonal Outlook

NOAA Seasonal Outlook

(May 2020)

Named Storms: 11-18

Hurricanes: 5-10

Major Hurricanes: 1-5

Source: NOAA, “NOAA’s 2020 Hurricane Season Outlooks,” at https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/

Epac_hurr/Slide1.JPG.

Issues for Congress

Congress has considered and may continue to consider issues around federal activities related to

tropical cyclone forecasting and impacts. Some issues, including the effects of climate change on

tropical cyclones and forecasting certain aspects of these storms, are directly linked to federal

tropical cyclone activities. Other issues, such as federal government interactions with the private

sector weather enterprise and potential fifth-generation (5G) interference with satellite sensors,

may affect the existing weather data structure, potentially leading to indirect impacts on federal

tropical cyclone activities.

Impacts of Climate Change on Tropical Cyclones

As of February 2020, NOAA has identified several potential changes related to tropical cyclones,

including that



all else equal, coastal inundation levels associated with tropical cyclones should

increase with sea level rise;42



tropical cyclone rainfall rates will likely increase in the future;

April 2020, at http://www.essc.psu.edu/essc_web/research/Hurricane2020.html.

40 NOAA, “NOAA’s 2020 Hurricane Season Outlooks,” at https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/Epac_hurr/

Slide1.JPG. Hereafter NOAA’s 2020 Hurricane Outlooks, Slide 1.

NOAA’s 2020 Hurricane Outlooks, Slide 1.

42 NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL), “Global Warming and Hurricanes,” last revised February

5, 2020, at https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/global-warming-and-hurricanes/. Hereafter NOAA GFDL, “Global Warming

and Hurricanes,” 2020. According to the report, the average rate of global sea level rise over the 21 st century will very

likely exceed that observed during 1971-2010 for a range of future emission scenarios. NOAA’s terminology for its

likelihood statements (for the assessed likelihood of an outcome or result) generally follows the conventions used by

the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In this case, very likely denotes a greater than 90% probability of

occurring and likely denotes a greater than 66% probability of occurring.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress



tropical cyclone intensities (wind speeds) globally will likely increase on average;

and



the global proportion of tropical cyclones that reach very intense (category 4 and

5) levels will likely increase. 43

NOAA continues to support research into the effects of climate change on tropical cyclones under

its current authorities. Members of Congress may consider whether additional federal resources

should be allocated to study the potential impacts of climate change on certain aspects of tropical

cyclones, such as storm surge and precipitation. At the House Science, Space, and Technology

Committee hearing entitled “Weathering the Storm: Improving Resiliency through Research” in

Houston, TX, on July 22, 2019, several participants spoke of work being done at federal and

nonfederal organizations and the need to better understand how storm surge and precipitation may

change with climate change. 44

For example, NOAA’s Assistant Administrator for Weather Services and Director of NWS Dr.

Louis Uccellini stated that NWS has been accommodating “that background, the changing

background state, into storm surge and potential impacts of intense storms,” and the agency needs

“to account for [the changing background state] with respect to [NWS] watches and warnings.”45

Representative Sheila Jackson Lee noted that “we need to focus our time understanding how

impactful climate change is.” University of Houston Director of the Hurricane Resilience

Research Institute Dr. Hanadi Rifai, noted that “much more effort” is needed to further develop

storm surge models into “robust predictive platforms” that incorporate climate change, among

other factors. 46

Forecasting Certain Aspects of Tropical Cyclones

The ability to forecast the potential path a storm may take, also known as its track, has improved

steadily since the 1960s (Figure 3). For example, track errors in the current decade are less than

half of what they were in the 1990s. 47 According to NOAA, the 2019 five-day track forecast was

better than the 1970s 36-hour forecast.48 Accuracy over an extended forecast time frame has

improved. In the 1990s, forecasts were available only on a three-day time frame; today forecasts

typically extend out to five days. 49 Some stakeholders argue that after years of significant

advances, improvements in track forecasting may be slowing. 50 The slowdown, these researchers

43 NOAA GFDL, “Global Warming and Hurricanes,” 2020.

44 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Science, Space, and T echnology, Subcommittee on Environment, Field

Hearing: Weathering the Storm: Improving Hurricane Resiliency through Research , 116 th Cong., 1 st sess., July 22,

2019 (Washington, DC: GPO, 2019), pp. 85-86, 94. Hereafter House Committee hearing, Improving Hurricane

Resiliency through Research, 2019.

45 House Committee hearing, Improving Hurricane Resiliency through Research, 2019, p. 85.

House Committee hearing, Improving Hurricane Resiliency through Research, 2019, pp. 29-30, 94.

47 Forecast errors indicate the difference between the forecast track and the actual t rack in nautical miles (n mi). T he

forecast period is shown in hours (h).

Written testimony of Assistant Administrator for Weather Services and Director of the NWS, Dr. Louis Uccellini in

U.S. Congress, House Committee on Science, Space, and T echnology, Subcommittee on Environment, Field Hearing:

Weathering the Storm: Improving Hurricane Resiliency through Research, 116 th Cong., 1 st sess., July 22, 2019.

Hereafter, Uccellini, written testimony, 2019.

In other words, five-day forecasts today are as good as three-day forecasts were 25 years ago.

50 Christopher W. Landsea and John P. Cangialosi, “ Have we reached the limits of predictability for tropical cyclone

track forecasting?,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 99, no. 11 (November 2018), pp. 2237 -2243.

Hereafter Landsea and Cangialosi, “Limits of Predictability,” 2018.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

contend, may be due to the limit of predicting how the most minor meteorological factors may

change over the course of a forecast.51

Figure 3. NHC Official Average Track Errors Comparison

by decade for Atlantic basin tropical storms and hurricanes

Source: Written testimony of Assistant Administrator for Weather Services and Director of the National

Weather Service Dr. Louis Uccellini, in U.S. Congress, House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology,

Subcommittee on Environment, Field Hearing: Weathering the Storm: Improving Hurricane Resiliency through

Research, 116 th Cong., 1 st sess., July 22, 2019.

Notes: Forecast errors indicate the difference between the forecast track and the actual track in nautical miles

(n mi); forecast period shown in hours (h). The National Hurricane Center (NHC) issues official forecasts every

6 h; each forecast has projections valid 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h after the forecast’s initial time.

Forecasting a storm’s wind speeds, also known as its intensity, is considered to be more difficult

than forecasting its track. The last decade brought advances in intensity forecasting (Figure 4).

The largest incremental improvements since the 1970s occurred between 2010 and 2018,

especially at the three-day and longer forecasts. 52 Some researchers identify the need for

51 Landsea and Cangialosi, “Limits of Predictability,” 2018.

T he 2010 to 2018 average intensity error for Atlantic basin tropical storms and hurricanes was close to 15 knots,

which corresponds roughly to a difference of one hurricane categor y on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale.

NOAA encourages communities that may be affected by these storms to prepare for a storm one category stronger than

what is forecasted to account for the expected average intensity error. NOAA NHC, “T he State of Hurricane

Forecasting,” March 9, 2018, at https://noaanhc.wordpress.com/2018/03/09/the-state-of-hurricane-forecasting/.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

improved models, enhanced observations, and better understanding of a storm’s inner core to

further improve the accuracy of intensity forecasts. 53 The increased accuracy and extended time

frame provide useful information to local, state, and federal emergency managers faced with

decisions about evacuating coastlines and staging emergency equipment and supplies.

Figure 4. NHC Official Average Intensity Errors Comparison

by decade for Atlantic basin tropical storms and hurricanes

Source: Written testimony of Assistant Administrator for Weather Services and Director of the National

Weather Service Dr. Louis Uccellini, in U.S. Congress, House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology,

Subcommittee on Environment, Field Hearing: Weathering the Storm: Improving Hurricane Resiliency through

Research, 116 th Cong., 1 st sess., July 22, 2019.

Notes: Intensity errors expressed as wind speed measured in knots (kts). Forecast period shown in hours (h).

The National Hurricane Center (NHC) issues official forecasts every 6 h, and each forecast has projections valid

12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h after the forecast’s initial time.

Track and intensity forecasts do not consider storm surge or precipitation-caused flooding, both of

which may be among the most dangerous elements of a storm. The amount of rainfall produced

by a storm may not necessarily be related to the intensity of the hurricane. 54 For example, record

levels of precipitation and subsequent flooding during Hurricane Harvey continued even after the

Mark DeMaria, “T ropical Cyclone Intensity Analysis and Forecasting,” paper presented at the WMO RA -IV

Workshop on Hurricane Forecasting and Warning, Miami, FL, March 7, 2017, at https://severeweather.wmo.int/

T CFW/RAIV_Workshop2017/19c_TC_Intensity_Forecasting_MarkDeMaria.pdf.

54 NOAA NHC, “Hurricane Preparedness-Hazards,” at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/prepare/hazards.php.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

storm made landfall and was downgraded from a hurricane to a tropical storm. 55 Improving the

ability to accurately forecast the timing, amount, and location of high rainfall periods could

advance the value of tropical cyclone forecasting. Research in both areas is ongoing. 56

Congress has directed or supported agency efforts in tropical cyclone-related research and

applications. Most recently, Congress enacted the Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation

Act of 2017 (WRFIA; P.L. 115-25, 15 U.S.C. 8514), which aimed to improve weather forecasting

and prediction, among other activities. 57 WRFIA Section 104 required the Under Secretary of

Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere to maintain a project to improve hurricane forecasting

with a goal to

“develop and extend accurate hurricane forecasts and warnings in order to reduce loss of

life, injury, and damage to the economy,” with a focus on

(1) improving the prediction of rapid intensification and track of hurricanes;

(2) improving the forecast and communication of storm surges from hurricanes; and

(3) incorporating risk communication research to create more effective watch and warning

products.58

Section 104 also required the development of a project plan to reach the congressional goals .

NOAA released the project plan in 2019. 59 The plan lists several strategies the agency plans to use

to achieve the goals, including the following:



advance an operational Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (a multiscale

model and data package capable of providing analyses and forecasts of the inner

core structure of tropical cyclones out to seven days);

improve probabilistic guidance that quantifies uncertainty for all tropical cyclone

hazards, such as wind and storm surge;

enhance communication of risk and uncertainty with “iterative, collaborated

physical, social, and behavioral science research”;

support dedicated high performance computing allocation to eliminate

competition with other high-priority computing needs across NOAA’s programs;

enhance research to operations including the acceleration of research and new

observing systems and platforms to operations; and

55 T om Di Liberto, “Reviewing Hurricane Harvey’s catastrophic rain and flooding,” NOAA, September 18, 2017, at

https://www.climate.gov/news-features/event-tracker/reviewing-hurricane-harveys-catastrophic-rain-and-flooding.

For example, researchers discuss recent research studies and forecast challenges related to tropical cyclones in Kevi n

Cheung et al., “Recent Advances in Research and Forecasting of T ropical Storm Rainfall,” Tropical Cyclone Research

and Review, vol. 7, no. 2 (May 2018).

For example, §107 requires the Assistant Administrator for Oceanic and Atmospheric Research to undertake

Observing System Simulation Experiments, or such other assessments as the Assistant Administrator considers

appropriate, to quantitatively assess the relative value and benefits of observing capabilities and systems over a variety

of topics (e.g., t he impact of observing capabilities on hurricane track and intensity forecasting) and §413 of the act

requires the Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere to acquire backup capabilities for Hurricane

Hunter aircraft.

15 U.S.C. §8514.

59 NOAA, Report to Congress: Hurricane Forecast Improvement Program , 2019, at https://repository.library.noaa.gov/

view/noaa/22034.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress



broaden expertise and expand interaction with the nonfederal community through

the Scientific Review Committee, a grants and contracts program, and outreach

and education.

The plan includes objectives for each strategy. It is unclear how NOAA has specifically

implemented each of the strategies and objectives and how much progress has been made in

reaching the goals established in P.L. 115-25. For example, the agency has continued to develop

and release a variety of tropical cyclone-related storm surge products for the public. 60 NOAA

plans to release additional products in 2020, including storm surge watch/warning graphics for

Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands and experimental peak storm surge forecast graphics for

the U.S. East and Gulf Coasts, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. 61 In another instance,

NOAA indicated in an annual report required under WRFIA that the U.S. Weather Research

Program currently supports several tropical cyclone projects, primarily focused on storm

development and intensity. 62 In both cases, it is unclear if these new products or projects are in

response to congressional direction in WRFIA or were planned or in development before

WRFIA’s enactment.

Congress continues to consider tropical cyclone forecasting in the 116 th Congress. For example,

the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee held a hearing on July 22, 2019 (see the

section entitled “Impacts of Climate Change on Tropical Cyclones”). Several participants noted

potential areas of storm forecasting improvement, including short- and long-term forecasting and

predicting storm surge and rainfall flooding. 63 In S.Rept. 116-127, the appropriations committee

“encourage[d] NWS to reduce errors in tracking and intensity forecasts of hurricanes by

identifying technology and methods available to significantly improve hurricane forecasting.”64

NOAA Interactions with the Private Sector Weather Enterprise

NOAA recognizes that the “nation’s environmental information enterprise,” including the

weather enterprise, is conducted by many parties (i.e., the government, private sector entities, and

the academic and research community), and the agency has the “responsibility” to foster growth

of the enterprise to serve the public interest and the nation’s economy. 65 Under statute, the

Secretary of Commerce is responsible for

forecasting of weather, the issue of storm warnings, the display of weather and flood

signals for the benefit of agriculture, commerce, and navigation, ... the distribution of

meteorological information in the interests of agriculture and commerce, and the taking of

such meteorological observations as may be necessary to establish and record the climatic

60 For example, NOAA has released experimental storm surge wat ch/warning graphics for the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf

Coasts since 2017. NHC, “Prototype Storm Surge Watch/Warning Graphic,” at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/

experimental/surgewarning/.

Michael Brennan, “National Hurricane Center Product Changes for 2020,” online video presentation, April 29, 2020,

at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWfh_iJcfv0&feature=youtu.be.

62 NOAA, Report to Congress: United States Weather Research Program Annual Project Report, 2020, at

https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/23647.

63 House Committee hearing, Improving Hurricane Resiliency through Research, 2019, pp. 10 and 92.

64 U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Departments of Commerce and Justice, Science, and Related

Agencies Appropriations Bill, 2020, report to accompany S. 2584, 116 th Cong., 1 st sess., S.Rept. 116-127, September

26, 2019 (Washington, DC: GPO, 2019), p. 54.

65 NOAA, “ Policy on Partnerships in the Provision of Environmental Information ,” NAO 216-112, last reviewed

January 31, 2019, at https://www.corporateservices.noaa.gov/ames/administrative_orders/chapter_216/216-112.html.

Hereafter NOAA, NAO 216-112.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

conditions of the United States, or as are essential for the proper execution of the foregoing

duties.66

To complete these activities, the federal government invests in physical infrastructure, shares

information with other federal agencies and nonfederal groups, and contracts services and data

from the private sector, among other sectors.67 According to NOAA, the private sector uses

agency information; develops and maintains an infrastructure of observation, communication, and

prediction systems; and provides a “critical private sector role” in working with the agency to

communicate forecasts and warnings that may affect public safety. 68

In 2016 and 2017, NWS “conducted a study to better understand the current and future landscape

of the broader weather enterprise in the United States.”69 NWS’s findings stated the following:

The NWS has an important role as the impartial and authoritative voice on public safety

and is a trusted partner to emergency managers, but could seek to collaborate more with

the private industry in this role by looking for opportunities to harness commercial

capabilities, engaging with companies to address risks, and identifying areas where private

industry services can complement core NWS services.

The NWS plays a key role in enabling the weather enterprise by providing weather, water,

and climate data at the forefront of science, and by partnering with the private in dustry and

academia to drive innovation – especially to operationalize emerging technologies and

foster community model development.

While many in the private industry have built upon the NWS’s infrastructure, products and

services thus far, there is potential for this paradigm to shift as private industry capabilities

increase and businesses become more dependent on weather, water, and climate

information.70

Congress has considered and may continue to consider whether federal government and private

sector roles in the weather enterprise should change. 71 For example, in 2016, Congress directed

that NOAA

66 15 U.S.C. §313.

67 NWS, National Weather Service Enterprise Analysis Report: Findings on changes to the private weather industry ,

June 8, 2017, p. 5, at https://www.weather.gov/media/about/

Final_NWS%20Enterprise%20Analysis%20Report_June%202017.pdf . (hereafter NWS, Enterprise Analysis Report);

and NOAA, Acquisition of Space-based Scientific Data from Commercial Sources to Supplement NOAA’s Weather and

Climate Observation Requirements: Report to Congress, 2010, at https://www.space.commerce.gov/wp-content/

uploads/2010-03-commercial-observations.pdf. Congress has limited the private sector’s role in the federal weather

enterprise in at least one aspect. Under statute, neither the President nor any other government official can “lease, sell

or transfer to the private sector, or commercialize” any weather satellite systems operated by the Department of

Commerce. See P.L. 111-314 §60161.

68 NOAA, NAO 216-112.

69 NWS, Enterprise Analysis Report, p. 2.

NWS, Enterprise Analysis Report, p. 3.

71 NOAA and other stakeholders have considered the appropriate roles for the federal government and private sector in

other NOAA activities. For example, NOAA released a request for information on the private sector’s role, among

other sectors, in mapping, exploring, and characterizing the U.S. exclusive economic zone (EEZ), and NOAA’s

FY2021 budget proposal notes that the agency “will continue its mapping of the U.S. EEZ utilizing Federal, academic,

philanthropic, and private research vessels.” NOAA, “Strategy for Mapping, Exploring, and Characterizing the U.S.

Exclusive Economic Zone,” 85 Federal Register 7734, February 11, 2020; and NOAA, Budget Estimates Fiscal Year

2021, p. 530, at https://www.commerce.gov/sites/default/files/2020-02/

fy2021_noaa_congressional_budget_justification.pdf.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

shall, through an open competitive process, seek to enter into at least one pilot contract to

assess the potential viability of commercial weather data in its weather modeling and

forecasting. This funding shall be used to purchase, evaluate, and calibrate available data,

which meets the standards and specifications set by NOAA in its Commercial Data

Policy.72

In its post-pilot report, required under WRFIA Section 302, NOAA stated that the “commercial

sector was not able to provide the quality and quantity of [radio occultation (RO)] data that

NOAA requires for use in operational weather forecasting” in the initial round. 73 However,

NOAA further asserted that “commercial RO systems show potential and, if progress continues,

could serve in the future as complementary sources to existing and future government systems,”

warranting further pilot project purchases for a more thorough evaluation. 74

Congress and the Trump Administration have indicated their support for increased agency

procurement and utilization of data and services from the private sector. In S.Rept. 116-127,

accompanying FY2020 appropriations legislation, Congress stated that FY2020 appropriations

would “support the assessment and potential use of commercial data in NOAA’s weather

modeling and forecasting through pilot purchases of commercial data.”75 NOAA’s FY2021

budget proposal states that “NOAA will engage private and academic institutions ... ultimately

leveraging their expertise and innovative cultures to reclaim and maintain international leadership

in the area of numerical weather prediction.”76

The private sector has also expanded its role in the weather enterprise. For example,

AccuWeather, a private company that develops and publishes its own hurricane forecasts, began

using a new scale for conveying the severity of hurricanes, rather than the historically used SaffirSimpson scale. 77 Some stakeholders have expressed that the creation and use of a new scale could

potentially cause public confusion during an emergency; others believe the new scale provides

more comprehensive information about a storm. 78

Some stakeholders believe the current distribution of roles and responsibilities between and the

government and the private sector should be maintained. 79 Others note that the private sector’s

role will continue to shift as private companies launch their own observational systems and run

their own forecasting models. 80 Still others have suggested that government and private sector

72 P.L. 114-113.

73 NOAA, Report to Congress: Commercial Weather Data Pilot Program , 2018, p. 6, at

https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/23645. Hereafter NOAA, CWDPP, 2018.

74 NOAA, CWDPP, 2018, p. 6.

75 S.Rept. 116-127, p. 62.

76 NOAA, Budget Estimates Fiscal Year 2021, p. 488, at https://www.commerce.gov/sites/default/files/2020-02/

fy2021_noaa_congressional_budget_justification.pdf.

77 AccuWeather, “AccuWeather’s New RealImpact (T M) Scale for Hurricanes will Revolutionize Damage Predictions

for Greater Public Safety,” January 9, 2019, at https://www.accuweather.com/en/press/83423274.

78 Our Daily Planet, “Private Weather Company to Use Different Hurricane Severity Scale,” January 15, 2019, at

https://www.ourdailyplanet.com/story/private-weather-company-to-use-different-hurricane-severity-scale/; and Angela

Fritz, “AccuWeather developed a hurricane category scale, and it worries some meteoro logists,” The Washington Post,

January 10, 2019, at https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2019/01/11/accuweather-developed-hurricane-categoryscale-it-worries-some-meteorologists/.

Jim Foerster, “What’s the difference between private weather companies and the National Weather Service?,”

Forbes, January 24, 2020, at https://www.forbes.com/sites/jimfoerster/2020/01/24/whats-the-difference-betweenprivate-weather-companies-and-the-national-weather-service/#5645031c4a29.

80 Andrew Freedman, “Weather is turning into big business. And that could be trouble for the public,” The Washington

Post, November 25, 2019, https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/11/25/weather-is-big-business-its-veering79

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

roles may change. For example, some have advocated for private and public entities to “continue

to promote adoption of open data policies and common alerting protocols while also encouraging

the use of new technologies and procurement approaches to help increase the reliability of

equipment.” 81

Potential 5G Technology Interference with Satellite Sensors

NOAA’s Use of the 23.8 Gigahertz Frequency

NOAA utilizes certain radio frequencies or bands for weather sensing, monitoring, forecasting,

and warning. For instance, water vapor emits microwave radiation at the 23.8 gigahertz (GHz)

frequency. An instrument known as the Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder (ATMS),

which is a part of several existing and planned NOAA satellites, passively measures 23.8 GHz

frequency to obtain data on water vapor, clouds, and precipitation. 82 According to NOAA, ATMS

collects “essential data for accurate near-term weather predictions needed for farming,

commercial and defense aircraft flight path planning, terrestrial extreme weather preparedness

and oceanographic inputs for civilian and defense ships.”83

Passive sensors, such as the ATMS, only receive signals, whereas active sensors (e.g., active radar

instruments) both emit and receive signals. Thus, passive sensors rely on the strength or

“emissivity” of natural sources. The inherent low-level emissivity of natural sources, such as

water vapor, makes the signals “particularly vulnerable” to active sources of signals close to the

same frequency as the natural source.84 Measuring natural sources using alternative frequencies is

“usually not feasible,” as natural sources of electromagnetic radiation, such as water vapor, emit

only in specific frequencies (as a matter of physics). 85

According to NOAA, the 23.8 GHz frequency is the sole frequency used to measure water vapor

for the entire vertical atmospheric profile between the satellite and the Earth’s surface; other

spectrum bands may complement this data. 86 Measurements taken at the 23.8 GHz frequency are

used in numerical weather prediction models and storm forecasting and tracking, among other

toward-collision-with-federal-government/.

Mary Glackin, “Improving the Forecast: Value and Public-Private Collaboration in Data Driven Weather Insights,”

World Meteorological Organization Bulletin, vol 68 (1) (2019), at https://public.wmo.int/en/resources/bulletin/

improving-forecast-value-and-public-private-collaboration-data-driven-weather.

82 Email correspondence with NOAA Office of Legislative Affairs on August 1 3, 2019. Additional U.S. satellite

missions that have used passive sensors to measure at the 23.8 gigahertz (GHz) band include NEMS/SCAMS, AMSU A, T MI, JASON-1 JMR, AMSR-E, AMSR, Jason-2 AMR, AMSR-2, and GMI. National Research Council (NRC),

Spectrum Management for Science in the 21 st Century, (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2010), pp. 56 -57

(hereafter NRC, Spectrum Management, 2010) and Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS), “Advanced T echnology

Microwave Sounder (AT MS),” at https://www.jpss.noaa.gov/atms.html (hereafter JPSS, “AT MS”).

83 JPSS, “AT MS.”

Sandra Cruz-Pol et al., “Spectrum Management and the Impact of RFI on Science Sensors,” 2018 IEEE 15 th

Specialist Meeting on Microwave Radiometry and Remote Sensing of the Environment (MicroRad), p. 53. Hereafter

Cruz-Pol et al., 2018.

85 Cruz-Pol et al., 2018.

86 T elephone conversation with NOAA Senior Policy Advisor, August 2, 2019 and email correspondence with NOAA

Office of Legislative Affairs on August 13, 2019. According to NOAA, water vapor measurements are also calibrated

using the 50 GHz spectrum band, another spectrum band being considered by the Federal Communications

Commission (FCC) for fifth-generation (5G) use.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

activities. 87 According to the National Research Council, global water vapor profiles are

“essential” to predicting rainfall and drought. 88 Water vapor data can help forecasters determine

how likely a storm is to develop and the locations with the heaviest rainfall. 89

Federal Frequency Management

In 2018, telecommunications providers began deploying 5G networks to meet growing demands

for data from consumer and industrial users. As more people use more mobile devices for more

purposes, the segment of the spectrum typically used for mobile communications (i.e., below 6

GHz) has become crowded. Proposed 5G expansion includes use of the 24 GHz band. The

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) manages spectrum allocation for nonfederal users

in the United States. The agency allocates spectrum for specific users and can assign frequencies

to entities or auction rights to use the spectrum. 90 All users who are assigned frequencies must

adhere to technical requirements to limit interference to users operating nearby, including limits

on out-of-band emissions—when high-power signals transmitted in one band disrupt signals in an

adjacent band.

Spectrum use is coordinated globally through the International Telecommunications Union (ITU),

an agency of the United Nations. The member-nations of the ITU adopt standards and

requirements for use, including emission limits to advance the ability to communicate globally.

NOAA and Other Stakeholder Concerns—Selected Timeline

According to NOAA, in 2016, ITU encouraged NOAA to complete studies of the impacts of 5G

expansion and emission interference on the 23.8 GHz frequency, among other frequencies. 91 In

2017, NOAA began working with FCC on initial 23.8 GHz studies and models using prepackaged modeling software and a limited set of input parameters determined by the software

specifications. After voicing concerns about the inherent assumptions used by the pre-packaged

software, FCC requested NOAA create its own model to allow the agencies to control the

programming code and input parameters. 92 NOAA partnered with NASA to do so. 93

NOAA has expressed concerns over interference in the 23.8 GHz band from use of nearby bands.

In a February 28, 2019, letter to FCC, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and NASA

Administrator Jim Bridenstine noted that the “current FCC proposal would have a significant

negative impact on the transmission of critical science data.”94 NOAA and NASA provided their

87 NRC, Spectrum Management, 2010, pp. 54-55.

88 NRC, Spectrum Management, 2010, p. 29.

89 NASA, T ERRA, “Atlantic’s Hurricane Oscar’s Water Vapor Measured by NASA’s T erra Satellite,” October 29,

2018, at https://terra.nasa.gov/news/atlantics-hurricane-oscars-water-vapor-measured-by-nasas-terra-satellite.

For example, FCC may allocate spect rum to public safety use, and license specific frequencies to specific public

safety agencies. FCC may also auction rights to use certain bands and frequencies; once the bidding process has

concluded, FCC may enter into licensing agreements with winners. For more information about 5G and spectrum

allocation, see CRS Report R45485, Fifth-Generation (5G) Telecommunications Technologies: Issues for Congress, by

Jill C. Gallagher and Michael E. DeVine.

91 T elephone conversation with NOAA Senior Policy Advisor, August 2, 2019.

92 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Science, Space, and T echnology, Subcommittee on Environment, The Future of

Forecasting: Building a Stronger U.S. Weather Enterprise, 116 th Cong., 1 st sess., May 16, 2019 (Washington, DC:

GPO, 2019), at https://plus.cq.com/doc/congressionaltranscripts-5544078?1&searchId=HPjfb3fd (accessed July 29,

2019). Hereafter House Committee hearing, The Future of Forecasting, 2019.

93 House Committee hearing, The Future of Forecasting, 2019.

94 Debra Werner, “5G trumps weather in spectrum debate,” Space News, March 8, 2019, at https://spacenews.com/5g-

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

joint study to FCC in March 2019 and advocated for an emission limit near -50 decibel watts

(dBW) per 200 megahertz (MHz). 95

FCC opened the 24 GHz auction to bidders on March 14, 2019, and closed the auction on May

28, 2019. 96 In a March 13, 2019, letter, Chairwoman Eddie Bernice Johnson and ranking member

Frank Lucas of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology requested that FCC

“delay the auction of 5G spectrum until NOAA, NASA, and the [Department of Defense] have

been adequately consulted and their concerns have been addressed.”97 FCC Chairman Ajit Pai

responded that the agency had established emission limits to protect passive service operations

for other nearby bands and had “not been presented with any evidence of harmful interference

from these existing services nor a validated study suggesting that operations in accordance with

these rules would adversely affect use of the 23.6-24 GHz allocation, including for weather

forecasting.”98 In a May 13, 2019, letter, ranking member Ron Wyden of the Senate Committee

on Finance and ranking member Maria Cantwell of the Senate Committee on Commerce,

Science, and Transportation requested FCC Chairman Pai

not to award any final licenses to winning bidders for the future commercial broadband use

in the 24 GHz spectrum until the FCC approves the passive band protection limits that

[NASA] and [NOAA] determine are necessary to protect critical satellite-based

measurements of atmospheric water vapor needed to forecast the weather.99

FCC Chairman Pai’s letter in response to the Senators provided information about the interagency

coordination process, timeline for of federal agency consideration, and thoughts on existing study

claims, including that “adopting the limits suggested by the Department of Commerce would

undeniably render the 24 GHz band unusable for 5G.”100

trumps-weather-in-spectrum-debate/.

95 NOAA Acting Under Secretary of Oceans and Atmosphere Neil Jacobs testified that NOAA and NASA had shared

the study with FCC in March 2019, but the report is undated. According to FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, NOAA shared the

study with FCC on March 11, 2019. A decibel watt (dBW) is a unit of power in decibel scale referenced to 1 watt. T he

decibel scale is logarithmic, therefore a -50 dBW limit would allow about three orders of magnitude less interference

than a -20 dBW limit. A 50 dBW limit would allow about three orders of magnitude more interference than a 20 dBW

limit. NOAA and NASA, Results from NASA/NOAA Sharing Studies on WRC-19 Agenda Item 1.13, undated, at

https://science.house.gov/imo/media/doc/Study%20prepared%20by%20NOAA%20and%20NASA%20 %20Results%20from%20NASANOAA%20Sharing%20Studies%20on%20WRC-19%20Agenda%20It em%201.13.pdf

(hereafter NOAA and NASA joint study); House Committee hearing, The Future of Forecasting, 2019; and letter

correspondence from FCC Chairman Pai to Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and T ransportation ranking

member Maria Cantwell, June 11, 2019, at https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-358166A1.pdf.

FCC, “Public Notice: Upfront Payment Deadline and Instructions and Other Dates for the Auction of 24 GHz Up per

Microwave Flexible Use Service Licenses (Auction 102),” January 31, 2019, at https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/

DA-19-24A1.pdf and FCC, “Public Notice: Auction of 24 GHz Upper Microwave Flexible Use Service Licenses

Closes,” June 3, 2019, at https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-19-485A1.pdf

97 Letter correspondence from House Committee on Science, Space, and T echnology Chairwoman Eddie Bernice

Johnson and ranking member Frank Lucas to FCC Chairman Pai, March 13, 2019, at https://docs.fcc.gov/public/

attachments/DOC-357582A2.pdf.

Letter correspondence from FCC Chairman Pai to House Committee on Science, Space, and T echnology

Chairwoman Johnson and ranking member Lucas, April 29, 2019, at https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC357582A1.pdf.

99 Letter correspondence from Senate Committee on Finance ranking member Ron Wyden and Senate Committee on

Commerce, Science, and T ransportation ranking member Cantwell to FCC Chairman Pai, May 13, 2019, at

https://www.wyden.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/

05132019%20FINAL%20Wyden%20Cantwell%20Letter%20to%20FCC%20re%205G%2024%20GHz%20Spectrum.

pdf.

100 Letter correspondence from FCC Chairman Pai to Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and T ransportation

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

In a May 16, 2019, House Science, Space, and Technology committee hearing, NOAAActing

Under Secretary of Oceans and Atmosphere Neil Jacobs stated that the NOAA and NASA joint

study found that the emission limit proposed by FCC (-20 dBW per 200 MHz) “would result in

roughly a 77 percent data loss from [NOAA] passive microwave sounders.”101 According to

Jacobs, the loss would

degrade the forecast scale by up to 30 percent, so if you look back in time to see when our

forecast goes roughly 30 percent less than it was today, it’s somewhere around 1980. This

would result in the reduction of hurricane track forecast lead time by roughly two to three

days.

A good example of this is a data denial study that the European Center did, where they

withheld the microwave sounder data during the forecast for Superstorm Sandy and a

model, which is the most accurate model in the world right now, kept the storm out to

sea.102

When asked if other instruments and observations could offset the loss, Jacobs testified that there

were currently no existing capabilities to mitigate the loss of information. 103 According to NOAA,

data losses of 2% or more due to emission interference would likely force NOAA to issue a stopwork order to contractors working on the next generation of satellites, as the onboard instruments

would no longer be able to meet mission requirements. 104

Jacobs also stated that NOAA had not identified scientific evidence to support FCC’s proposed

emissions limit, and NOAA had instead advocated for an emissions limit near -50 dBW per 200

MHz, which “would result in roughly zero data loss.”105 According to NOAA, its proposed

emission limit relied on the NOAA and NASA joint study, in concurrence with the U.S. Navy and

a study by the European Space Agency, which found that a more restrictive emissions limit was

needed. 106

A July 2019 National Academy of Sciences meeting to discuss the “implications of proposed 5G

service in 24 GHz bands for remote sensing of atmospheric water vapor” was canceled reportedly

due to a reluctance to participate by “many of the ‘most knowledgeable about the topic.’”107 In a

July 2019 letter to FCC Chairman Pai, Senator John Kennedy wrote to “commend [FCC] for the

ranking member Cantwell, June 11, 2019, at https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-358166A1.pdf.

101 House Committee hearing, The Future of Forecasting, 2019. T he House Committee on Science, Space, and

T echnology has since released NOAA’s report. NOAA and NASA joint study.

102

House Committee hearing, The Future of Forecasting, 2019.

103 House Committee hearing, The Future of Forecasting, 2019.

104 House Committee hearing, The Future of Forecasting, 2019.

105

House Committee hearing, The Future of Forecasting, 2019. T he decibel scale is logarithmic, therefore a -50 dBW

limit would allow about three orders of magnitude less interference than the proposed -20 dBW limit. American

Institute of Physics, “NOAA Warns 5G Spectrum Interference Presents Majo r T hreat to Weather Forecasts,” May 22,

2019, at https://www.aip.org/fyi/2019/noaa-warns-5g-spectrum-interference-presents-major-threat-weather-forecasts.

106 House Committee hearing, The Future of Forecasting, 2019. Senator Wyden released a document from the Navy

regarding “operational impacts from potential loss of NOAA/NASA MET OC satellite data resulting from the FCC

spectrum auction for 5G.” Captain Marc Eckardt, Operational impacts from potential loss of NOAA/NASA METOC

satellite data resulting from the FCC spectrum auction for 5G, Information Brief, March 27, 2019, at

https://www.wyden.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Navy%2024Hz%205G%20Spectrum%20Impacts.pdf.

Hal Bernton, “High-stakes dispute turns nasty, pits 5G technology against weather forecasting,” The Seattle Times,

August 5, 2019, at https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/will-5g-satellite-deployment-undermine-noaa-weatherforecasting/; and workshop cancellation notice at National Academy of Sciences Board on Atmospheric Science and

Climate, “ Upcoming Workshop,” at http://dels.nas.edu/Upcoming-Workshop/Implications-Proposed-Service/AUT O-614-56-P?bname=basc.

107

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

successful close of the 24 GHz band auction,” noting that “no federal party—not the Department

of Commerce, NOAA, or NASA—raised any objections or concerns in the public docket.”108

In September 2019, House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology Chairwoman Johnson

sent a letter to FCC Chairman Pai requesting FCC analysis of the out of band emissions limits,

including the agency’s review of the NOAA and NASA joint study. 109

In an October 15, 2019, letter, FCC Chairman Pai responded to Senator Kennedy stating that

“despite efforts by some to undermine the official position of the US government” the FCC was

successful in advocating for a mandatory limit of -28 dBW per 200 MHz at a regional

telecommunications meeting. 110 Chairwoman Johnson sent a follow-up letter dated October 23,

2019 to FCC Chairman Pai requesting a response to her September letter. 111 FCC’s site with

Chairman Pai’s responses to congressional letters does not include a response to Chairwoman

Johnson’s September and October 2019 letters. 112

In November 2019, national delegations met at ITU’s World Radiocommunication Conference to

finalize 5G spectrum allocations. The United States proposed an emissions limit of -28 dBW per

200 MHz for the 24 GHz band. 113 The conference participants agreed to an emissions limit of -33

dBW per 200 MHz, with the limit increasing to -39 dBW per 200 MHz in 2027. 114

In December 2019, Chairwoman Johnson and ranking member Lucas of the House Committee on

Science, Space, and Technology requested that the Government Accountability Office conduct an

evaluation of “how the Federal government, including the FCC and the National

Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), resolves interference issues and

ensures that spectrum is available to meet critical needs.”115

Some stakeholders, such as the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) and

the World Meteorological Organization, have expressed their concerns of interference and have

advocated for an emissions limit of -42 dBW for the 24 GHz band. 116 Others have argued that

108 Letter correspondence from Senator Kennedy to FCC Chairman Pai, July 18, 2019, at https://docs.fcc.gov/public/

attachments/DOC-360437A2.pdf.

109

Letter correspondence from Chairwoman Johnson to FCC Chairman Pai, September 30, 2019, at

https://science.house.gov/imo/media/doc/

9.30.19%20Letter%20to%20FCC%20re%20NOAA%20NASA%20Studies%201.pdf .

110 Letter correspondence from FCC Chairman Pai to Senator John Kennedy, October 15, 2019, at https://docs.fcc.gov/

public/attachments/DOC-360437A1.pdf. It is unclear when and how FCC changed its emissions limit proposal from 20 dBW per 200 megahertz (MHz) to -28 dBW per 200 MHz.

111 Letter correspondence from Chairwoman Johnson to FCC Chairman Pai, October 23, 2019, at

https://science.house.gov/imo/media/doc/10.23.19%20Follow-up%20FCC%20Letter%20%20.pdf.

112 FCC, “Chairman Pai’s Letters to Congress,” at https://www.fcc.gov/chairman-pais-letters-congress.

113 Inter-American T elecommunication Commission (CIT EL), “Status of CIT EL’s Preparations for WRC-19,” slides

presented at the 3 rd International T elecommunications Union (IT U) Inter-Regional Workshop on WRC-19 Preparation,

Geneva, September 2-6, 2019, p. 9, at https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-r/md/15/3rdwrc19prepwork/c/R153RDWRC19PREPWORK-C-0007!!PDF-E.pdf.

114

IT U, “Key outcomes of the World Radiocommunications Conference 2019,” ITU News Magazine, no. 6, 2019, p.23,

at https://www.itu.int/en/itunews/Documents/2019/2019-06/2019_ITUNews06-en.pdf.

115 Letter correspondence between Chairwoman Johnson and ranking member Lucas and Government Accountability

Office (GAO) Comptroller General of the United States General Dodaro, December 2019, at https://science.house.gov/

imo/media/doc/12.10.19%20GAO%20Request%20Letter%2024%20GHz%20_EBJ%20and%20Lucas%20.pdf . As of

June 10, 2020, it is unknown if the GAO has begun conducting the requested study.

116

National Center for Atmospheric Research, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR), “UCAR

Statement on Opening the 24 GHz Spectrum,” June 18, 2019 , at https://news.ucar.edu/132669/ucar-statement-opening24-ghz-spectrum; World Meteorological Organization, “WMO: protect ratio frequencies vital to earth observations,”

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

NOAA’s claims are based on flawed studies, fail to consider new technologies, and were

introduced at the last minute. 117 Concerns over emission limits and degradation of satellite data

are likely to continue as FCC plans to open up several other spectrum bands for auction in the

next few years.

June 14, 2019, at https://public.wmo.int/en/media/news/wmo-protect-radio-frequencies-vital-earth-observations; and

Debra Werner, “International weather agencies object to 5G spectrum decision,” Space News, November 27, 2019, at

https://spacenews.com/international-weather-agencies-object-to-5g-spectrum-decision/.

117 Liam Siguad,

“5G won’t ruin your weather forecast,” The Hill, June 18, 2019, at https://thehill.com/opinion/

technology/449060-5g-wont-ruin-your-weather-forecast; letter correspondence from members of several organizations

to FCC Chairman Pai, December 16, 2019, at https://www.ccagw.org/sites/default/files/LBand%20Coalition%20letter.pdf; and CT IA, “How 5G will improve weather forecasting & preparedness,” July 2,

2019, at https://www.ctia.org/news/how-5g-will-improve-weather-forecasting-preparedness.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

Appendix A. 2019 Hurricane Season Outlooks and

Overviews

2019 Atlantic Hurricane Season Outlook and Overview

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) issued its 2019 Atlantic

hurricane season outlook in May 2019 and published an updated outlook in August 2019 (Table

A-1). In the May outlook, NOAA indicated that a near-normal season had the highest chance

(40%) of occurring. 118 The August update indicated an increased chance (45%) that the 2019

hurricane season would be above-normal, with a 35% chance of a near-normal season and a 20%

chance of a below-normal season. 119 For comparison, the 1981 to 2010 seasonal averages include

12 named storms, 6 hurricanes, and 3 major hurricanes.

Table A-1. 2019 Atlantic Hurricane Season: Comparison Between Seasonal Outlook

and Actual Storms

NOAA Seasonal Outlook

(May 2019)

NOAA Seasonal Outlook

(August 2019)

Actual

Named Storms: 9-15

Named Storms: 10-17

Named Storms: 18

Hurricanes: 4-8

Hurricanes: 5-9

Hurricanes: 6

Major Hurricanes: 2-4

Major Hurricanes: 3

Sources: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Weather Service (NWS)

Climate Prediction Center (CPC), “NOAA 2019 Atlantic Hurricane Season Outlook,” May 23, 2019, at

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/outlooks/hurricane2019/May/hurricane.shtml; NOAA, NWS CPC,

“NOAA 2019 Atlantic Hurricane Season Outlook,” August 8, 2019, at https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/

outlooks/hurricane2019/August/hurricane.shtml; and NOAA, “Hurricanes and Tropical Storms – November

2019,” at https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/tropical-cyclones/201911.

In its August update, NOAA provided two reasons for a more active 2019 hurricane season than

originally predicted in May 2019:120



El Niño conditions dissipated in July, and El Niño conditions were expected to

remain neutral. (El Niño conditions typically suppress factors that may lead to

hurricanes, so neutral conditions could favor increased hurricane activity.) 121

The conducive conditions associated with the ongoing high-activity era for

Atlantic hurricanes that began in 1995 remained in effect. 122

118 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Weather Service (NWS) Climate Prediction

Center (CPC), “NOAA 2019 Atlantic Hurricane Season Outlook,” May 23, 2019, at https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/

products/outlooks/hurricane2019/May/hurricane.shtml.

NOAA NWS CPC, “NOAA 2019 Atlantic Hurricane Season Outlook,” August 8, 2019, at

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/outlooks/hurricane2019/August/hurricane.shtml. Hereafter NOAA, “August

2019 Atlantic Hurricane Outlook.”

119

120 NOAA, “August 2019 Atlantic Hurricane Outlook.”

121 For more information about El Niño, see NOAA, “El Niño,” at https://www.noaa.gov/education/resource-

collections/weather-atmosphere-education-resources/el-nino.

122 For more information about the ongoing high-activity era, see NOAA, “Atlantic high-activity eras: What does it

mean for hurricane season?,” at https://www.noaa.gov/stories/atlantic-high-activity-eras-what-does-it-mean-for-

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

In 2019, for the fifth consecutive year, hurricane activity began prior to June 1, with the formation

of Subtropical Storm Andrea on May 20, 2019. 123 Eighteen named storms formed in the north

Atlantic basin between May 20 and November 30, 2019, three of which reached major hurricane

strength (Dorian, Humberto, and Lorenzo). 124 Tropical Storm Imelda produced historic rainfall

totals and devastating flooding over parts of eastern Texas, similar to that of Hurricane Harvey in

2017. 125 The 2019 Atlantic hurricane season marks the fourth consecutive above-normal Atlantic

hurricane season (1998-2001 is the only other period on record with four consecutive abovenormal seasons). 126 Forecasts for each of the three major hurricanes are discussed below.

Hurricane Dorian

Hurricane Dorian was the first major hurricane of the 2019 season (Figure A-1). The category 5

storm tied with three other hurricanes as the second strongest hurricane on record in the Atlantic

basin in terms of wind speed. 127 The storm caused catastrophic storm surge flooding in the

Bahamas and various levels of storm surge flooding along the coast of the southeastern United

States. 128 The storm also resulted in high rainfall in parts of the Bahamas, South Carolina, North

Carolina, and later in Nova Scotia. 129 It spawned 21 tornadoes, mostly in North Carolina, of

assorted intensities. 130 After stalling over the northwestern Bahamas for several days, Hurricane

Dorian brushed the southeast U.S. coast and made landfall on the Outer Banks of North Carolina

as a category 1 hurricane. 131 Hurricane Dorian was responsible for four indirect deaths in the

United States, in addition to multiple deaths reported in the Bahamas. 132 The storm caused

estimated damages of $3.4 billion in the Bahamas and $1.6 billion in the United States. 133

The National Hurricane Center (NHC) track forecast for Hurricane Dorian was better than

average, meaning the forecast errors were lower than the average official forecast errors for

hurricanes during the previous five-year (2014-2018) period (Table A-2). According to NOAA,

the reformation of Dorian’s center after crossing St. Lucia resulted in a significant shift in track,

hurricane-season.

123 NOAA, “Active 2019 Atlantic hurricane season comes to an end,” at https://www.noaa.gov/media-release/active2019-atlantic-hurricane-season-comes-to-end. Hereafter NOAA, “Active 2019 Atlantic.”

124NOAA, “Active 2019 Atlantic.”

125 NOAA, “Hurricanes and T ropical Storms – September 2019,” at https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/tropical-cyclones/

201909 (hereafter NOAA, “Hurricanes and T ropical Storms – September 2019”); and Andy Latto and Robbie Berg,

National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report: Tropical Storm Imelda, NOAA, 2019, at

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL112019_Imelda.pdf.

126 NOAA, “Active 2019 Atlantic”; and NOAA, “Hurricanes and T ropical Storms – September 2019.”

127 NOAA, “Hurricanes and T ropical Storms – August

2019,” at https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/tropical-cyclones/

201908. Hereafter NOAA, “Hurricanes and T ropical Storms – August 2019.”

128 Lixion A. Avila et al., National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Dorian, 2020, pp. 6-8 at

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL052019_Dorian.pdf. Hereafter Avila et al., Hurricane Dorian, 2020.

129 Avila et al., Hurricane Dorian, 2020, p. 8.

130 Avila et al., Hurricane Dorian, 2020, p. 8.

131 NOAA, “Hurricanes and T ropical Storms – August

2019.”

According to NOAA, “deaths occurring from such factors as heart attacks, house fires, electrocutions from downed

power lines, vehicle accidents on wet roads, etc., are considered ‘indirect’ deaths.” Avila et al., Hurricane Dorian,

2020, pp. 8-10.

132

133 Avila et al., Hurricane Dorian, 2020, pp. 8-9.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

resulting in a “lack of adequate warning for some of the islands of the northeastern Caribbean

Sea” and an intensity forecast that underestimated the storm’s expected wind speeds. 134

The official NHC intensity forecasts for Hurricane Dorian were worse than the previous five-year

average in all forecast periods (Table A-3). NHC noted that “most of the large errors are related

to the fact that Dorian’s center did not move over Hispaniola, and the failure in forecasting rapid

intensification (RI) when Dorian was near the Bahamas.”135

NHC issued storm surge watches and warnings at various times along the coasts of the Bahamas

and the southeastern United States. NHC forecasted storm surge of peak storm surge of 18 to 23

feet above normal tide level in parts of the Bahamas; according to NHC, “eye witness accounts

indicate that at least 20 feet of inundation occurred.”136 Storm surge of at least 3 feet occurred

along some parts of the southeastern shore of the United States, however, other portions of the

warning area did not “verify,” with inundation less than 3 feet above ground level. 137 According

to NHC, “although a sizeable portion of the Storm Surge Warning area did not verify, the issuance

of the watch and warning was justified given that a slight westward deviation of Dorian’s track,

or an expansion of its wind field, would have caused signific ant storm surge flooding to occur

along a larger proportion of the coast.”138

134

Avila et al., Hurricane Dorian, 2020, p. 10.

135 Avila et al., Hurricane Dorian, 2020, p. 11.

136 Avila et al., Hurricane Dorian, 2020, p. 12.

137 Avila et al., Hurricane Dorian, 2020, p. 12.

138 Avila et al., Hurricane Dorian, 2020, p. 12.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

Figure A-1. Hurricane Dorian’s Track

August 24, 2019, through September 7, 2019

Source: Lixion A. Avila et al., National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Dorian, 2020, p. 56, at

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL052019_Dorian.pdf.

Notes: Numbers along the hurricane track indicate dates (e.g., 14 equals September 14, 2019). The small arrow

indicates the point where the hurricane reached its lowest recorded pressure (910 millibars).

Table A-2. NHC Official Track Forecast Errors for Hurricane Dorian Compared with

the 2014-2018 Average

in nautical miles

Forecast

Forecast Period

12 Hours

24 Hours

36 Hours

48 Hours

72 Hours

96 Hours

120 Hours

NHC

Official

14.3

27.0

38.9

49.5

70.6

109.4

159.7

2014-2018

Averages

23.6

35.5

47.0

61.8

96.0

136.0

179.6

Sources: Lixion A. Avila et al., National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Dorian, 2020, p. 39, at

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL052019_Dorian.pdf; and email correspondence with NOAA Office of

Legislative Affairs, May 14, 2020.

Notes: Forecast errors indicate the difference between the forecast track and the actual track in nautical miles.

The National Hurricane Center (NHC) issues official forecasts every 6 hours, and each forecast has projections

valid 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours after the forecast’s initial time.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

According to NOAA, forecast errors are compared with a five-year period of average errors, as the five-year

period is 1) recent with respect to the state of the science and 2) includes a large number of tropical cyclones to

allow for robust statistical analysis.

Table A-3. NHC Official Intensity Forecast Errors for Hurricane Dorian

Compared with the 2014-2018 Average

in nautical miles per hour, or knots

Forecast

Forecast Period

12 Hours

24 Hours

36 Hours

48 Hours

72 Hours

96 Hours

120 Hours

NHC

Official

6.6

10.7

13.1

14.3

17.8

25.7

38.9

2014-2018

Averages

5.3

7.9

9.9

11.2

13.3

14.4

14.2

Sources: Lixion A. Avila et al., National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Dorian, 2020, p. 41, at

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL052019_Dorian.pdf; and email correspondence with NOAA Office of

Legislative Affairs, May 14, 2020.

Notes: Forecast errors indicate the difference between the forecast intensity and the actual intensity in nautical

miles per hour, or knots.

NHC issues official forecasts every 6 hours, and each forecast has projections valid 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and

120 hours after the forecast’s initial time.

According to NOAA, forecast errors are compared with a five-year period of average errors, as the five-year

period is 1) recent with respect to the state of the science and 2) includes a large number of tropical cyclones to

allow for robust statistical analysis.

Hurricane Humberto

Hurricane Humberto was a category 3 hurricane that passed the eastern portions of the Bahamas,

days after Hurricane Dorian’s impacts (Figure A-2). 139 The storm brought hurricane-force winds

to Bermuda and large swells and rip currents to the southeast United States. 140 Hurricane

Humberto was responsible for two deaths in the United States and over $25 million in damages in

Bermuda. 141 According to NOAA, rainfall amounts associated with the storm w ere relatively light

compared with most tropical cyclones. 142

139 Stacy R. Stewart, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Humberto, 2019, at

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL092019_Humberto.pdf. Hereafter Stewart, Hurricane Humberto, 2019.

140 Stewart, Hurricane Humberto, 2019.

141 Stewart, Hurricane Humberto, 2019, pp. 6-7.

142 Stewart, Hurricane Humberto, 2019, p. 6.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

Figure A-2. Hurricane Humberto’s Track

September 13, 2019, through September 19, 2019

Source: Stacy R. Stewart, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Humberto, 2019, p. 26, at

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL092019_Humberto.pdf.

Notes: Numbers along the hurricane track indicate dates (e.g., 14 denotes September 14, 2019). The small

arrow indicates the point where the hurricane reached its lowest recorded pressure (950 millibars).

The NHC track forecast for Hurricane Humberto was better than average, meaning the forecast

errors were lower than the average official forecast errors for hurricanes during the previous fiveyear (2014-2018) period (Table A-4). According to NOAA, once Hurricane Humberto became a

tropical cyclone, track forecasts improved “significantly.”143

The accuracy of the official NHC intensity forecast for Hurricane Humberto was better than the

previous five-year average forecasts in the 12 hour to 72 hour periods but worse than the averages

in the 96 hour and 120 hour periods (Table A-5). NHC noted that forecasts did not anticipate

Hurricane Humberto’s continued strengthening in high wind shear conditions, which led to the

larger than average errors at the 96 hour and 120 hour marks.144 The forecast also did not capture

the storm’s rapid weakening. NHC did not issue any storm surge watches or warnings for this

storm.

143 Stewart, Hurricane Humberto, 2019, p. 7.

144 Stewart, Hurricane Humberto, 2019, p. 8.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

Table A-4. NHC Official Track Forecast Errors for Hurricane Humberto

Compared with the 2014-2018 Average

in nautical miles

Forecast

Forecast Period

12 Hours

24 Hours

36 Hours

48 Hours

72 Hours

96 Hours

120 Hours

NHC

Official

17.5

29.2

44.6

58.8

93.2

75.5

122.8

2014-2018

Averages

23.6

35.5

47.0

61.8

96.0

136.0

179.6

Sources: Stacy R. Stewart, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Humberto, 2019, p. 26, at

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL092019_Humberto.pdf; and email correspondence with NOAA Office of

Legislative Affairs, May 14, 2020.

Notes: Forecast errors indicate the difference between the forecast track and the actual track in nautical miles.

NHC issues official forecasts every 6 hours, and each forecast has projections valid 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and

120 hours after the forecast’s initial time.

According to NOAA, forecast errors are compared with a five-year period of average errors, as the five-year

period is 1) recent with respect to the state of the science and 2) includes a large number of tropical cyclones to

allow for robust statistical analysis.

Table A-5. NHC Official Intensity Forecast Errors for Hurricane Humberto

Compared with the 2014-2018 Average

in nautical miles per hour, or knots

Forecast

Forecast Period

12 Hours

24 Hours

36 Hours

48 Hours

72 Hours

96 Hours

120 Hours

NHC

Official

5.2

6.2

5.3

8.5

10.8

17.2

21.0

2014-2018

Averages

5.3

7.9

9.9

11.2

13.3

14.4

14.2

Source: Stacy R. Stewart, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Humberto, 2019, p. 28, at

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL092019_Humberto.pdf; and email correspondence with NOAA Office of

Legislative Affairs, May 14, 2020.

Notes: Forecast errors indicate the difference between the forecast intensity and the actual intensity in nautical

miles per hour, or knots.

NHC issues official forecasts every 6 hours, and each forecast has projections valid 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and

120 hours after the forecast’s initial time.

According to NOAA, forecast errors are compared with a five-year period of average errors, as the five-year

period is 1) recent with respect to the state of the science and 2) includes a large number of tropical cyclones to

allow for robust statistical analysis.

Hurricane Lorenzo

Hurricanes typically become major hurricanes in the western portion of the north Atlantic Ocean;

Hurricane Lorenzo was one of the strongest hurricanes on record in the eastern or central Atlantic

and the farthest east of any category 5 hurricane in the Atlantic on record (Figure A-3).145 The

145 David A. Zelinsky, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Lorenzo, 2019, at

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL132019_Lorenzo.pdf (hereafter Zelinsky, Hurricane Lorenzo, 2019); and

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

storm remained a category 1 hurricane as it passed the Azores Islands. 146 The hurricane generated

hazardous surf and marine conditions along the U.S. East Coast and strong winds and powerful

waves in the Azores and Ireland. 147 Hurricane Lorenzo was responsible for 19 deaths in total,

including 8 people along the U.S. East Coast. 148

Figure A-3. Hurricane Lorenzo’s Track

September 22, 2019, through October 4, 2019

Source: David A. Zelinsky, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Lorenzo, 2019, at

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL132019_Lorenzo.pdf.

Notes: Numbers along the hurricane track indicate dates (e.g., 24 denotes September 14, 2019). The small

arrow indicates the point where the hurricane reached its lowest recorded pressure (925 millibars) .

The NHC track forecast errors for Hurricane Lorenzo were lower than the average official

forecast errors during the previous five-year (2014-2018) period (Table A-6). 149 The NHC

intensity forecast for Hurricane Lorenzo had greater errors in the 12 hour and 24 hour periods

than the mean official errors for the previous five-year period but the errors decreased at 36 hours

and beyond (Table A-7). 150 NHC noted that the relatively high errors in the short-term forecasts

NOAA, “Hurricanes and T ropical Storms – September 2019.”

146

NOAA, “Hurricanes and T ropical Storms – September 2019.”

147 Zelinsky, Hurricane Lorenzo, 2019, pp. 4-5.

148 T he other 11 deaths account for the crewmembers of the Bourbon Rhode. NHC provided 35 forecasts in support of

the U.S. Coast Guard’s search and rescue mission. Zelinsky, Hurricane Lorenzo, 2019, pp. 4 and 6.

149 Zelinsky, Hurricane Lorenzo, 2019, p. 5.

150 Zelinsky, Hurricane Lorenzo, 2019, p. 6.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

were primarily associated with Hurricane Lorenzo’s rapid intensification (RI) and weakening at

the storm’s onset.151 None of the intensity models reviewed captured the storm’s large intensity

swings. 152

Table A-6. NHC Official Track Forecast Errors for Hurricane Lorenzo Compared

with the 2014-2018 Average

in nautical miles

Forecast

Forecast Period

12 Hours

24 Hours

36 Hours

48 Hours

72 Hours

96 Hours

120 Hours

NHC

Official

19.0

25.2

34.0

45.2

68.2

90.5

102.0

2014-2018

Averages

23.6

35.5

47.0

61.8

96.0

136.0

179.6

Sources: David A. Zelinsky, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Lorenzo, 2019, p. 12, at

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL132019_Lorenzo.pdf; and email correspondence with NOAA Office of

Legislative Affairs, May 14, 2020.

Notes: Forecast errors indicate the difference between the forecast track and the actual track in nautical miles.

NHC issues official forecasts every 6 hours, and each forecast has projections valid 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and

120 hours after the forecast’s initial time.

According to NOAA, forecast errors are compared with a five-year period of average errors, as the five-year

period is 1) recent with respect to the state of the science and 2) includes a large number of tropical cyclones to

allow for robust statistical analysis.

Table A-7. NHC Official Intensity Forecast Errors for Hurricane Lorenzo Compared

with the 2014-2018 Average

in nautical miles per hour, or knots

Forecast

Forecast Period

12 Hours

24 Hours

36 Hours

48 Hours

72 Hours

96 Hours

120 Hours

NHC

Official

7.6

10.7

8.6

8.7

12.7

11.6

11.4

2014-2018

Averages

5.3

7.9

9.9

11.2

13.3

14.4

14.2

Sources: David A. Zelinsky, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Lorenzo, 2019, p. 14, at

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL132019_Lorenzo.pdf; and email correspondence with NOAA Office of

Legislative Affairs, May 14, 2020.

Notes: Forecast errors indicate the difference between the forecast intensity and the actual intensity in nautical

miles per hour, or knots.

NHC issues official forecasts every 6 hours, and each forecast has projections valid 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and

120 hours after the forecast’s initial time.

According to NOAA, forecast errors are compared with a five-year period of average errors, as the five-year

period is 1) recent with respect to the state of the science and 2) includes a large number of tropical cyclones to

allow for robust statistical analysis.

151 Zelinsky, Hurricane Lorenzo, 2019, p. 6.

152 Zelinsky, Hurricane Lorenzo, 2019, p. 6.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

2019 Eastern Pacific Hurricane Season Outlook and Overview

NOAA’s May 2019 eastern Pacific hurricane outlook predicted a 70% chance of an above-normal

hurricane season, a 20% chance of a near-normal season, and a 10% chance of a below-normal

season (Table A-8). 153 The 2019 eastern Pacific hurricane season ran from May 15 to November

30.

Table A-8. 2019 Eastern Pacific Hurricane Season: Comparison Between Seasonal

Outlook and Actual Storms

NOAA Seasonal Outlook (May 2019)

Actual

Named Storms: 15-22

Named Storms: 17

Hurricanes: 8-13

Hurricanes: 7

Major Hurricanes: 4-8

Major Hurricanes: 4

Sources: NHC, NOAA 2019 Eastern Pacific Hurricane Season Outlook, May 23, 2019, at

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/Epac_hurr/; and NOAA, “Hurricanes and Tropical Storms – November

2019,” at https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/tropical-cyclones/201911.

According to NOAA, the 2019 eastern Pacific hurricane season was in line with the seasonal

outlook and had near average activity. 154 Four hurricanes (Barbara, Erick, Juliette, and Kiko)

reached major hurricane status in the eastern Pacific region. 155 Several storms impacted Hawaii,

including by then-Tropical Storm Barbara and Hurricane Erick, each of which created high surf

and heavy rain across parts of the islands. 156

2019 Central Pacific Hurricane Season Outlook and Overview

NOAA does not identify a specific number of named storms, hurricanes, or major hurricanes in

its central Pacific hurricane outlooks. 157 Instead, the agency predicted five to eight tropical

cyclones in 2019, with a 70% chance of above-normal tropical cyclone activity. 158 Tropical

cyclones include tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes. 159 An El Niño event was

expected to last through the fall, however, cooling commenced early in the summer leading to

neutral conditions. 160 As a result, the 2019 central Pacific hurricane season featured four tropical

cyclones, several of which originated (Erick and Flossie) in the eastern Pacific area. 161

NOAA, NOAA’s 2019 Hurricanes Season Outlooks, at https://cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/Epac_hurr/Slide1.JPG.

Hereafter NOAA’s 2019 Hurricane Outlooks, Slide 1.

153

154 NOAA, “Monthly Eastern North Pacific T ropical Weather Summary,” at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/text/

MIAT WSEP.shtml.

155

U.S. Department of Commerce, National Weather Service (NWS), “Eastern North P acific Hurricane T racking

Chart,” at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb_latest/tws_pac_latest.gif.

156 NWS, “2019 Hurricane Season Summary for the Central Pacific Basin” at https://www.weather.gov/hfo/

2019_CentralPacificHurricaneSeasonSummary. Hereafter NWS, “2019 Central Pacific.”

157

NOAA predicts the total number of tropical cyclones, instead of a breakdown of named storms, hurricanes, and

major hurricanes, in its central Pacific hurricane outlook due to “low statistical skill provided the typically small sample

size of hurricanes and major hurricanes in the Central Pacific.” Email from NOAA Office of Legislative Affairs,

January 24, 2020.

158 NWS, “2019 Central Pacific.”

159 NOAA’s 2019 Hurricane Outlooks, Slide 1.

160 NWS, “2019 Central Pacific.”

161 NWS, “2019 Central Pacific.”

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

Appendix B. 2018 Hurricane Season Outlooks and

Overviews

2018 Atlantic Hurricane Season Outlook and Overview

NOAA predicted a total of 10-16 named storms in its May 2018 outlook and downgraded the total

named storms to 9-13 storms in the August update. 162 The number and strength of actual storms

exceeded the upper range of NOAA’s seasonal outlook (Table B-1).

Table B-1. 2018 Atlantic Hurricane Season: Comparison Between Seasonal Outlook

and Actual Storms

NOAA Seasonal Outlook

(May 2018)

NOAA Seasonal Outlook

(August 2018)

Actual

Named Storms: 10-16

Named Storms: 9-13

Named Storms: 15

Hurricanes: 5-9

Hurricanes: 4-7

Hurricanes: 8

Major Hurricanes: 1-4

Major Hurricanes: 0-2

Major Hurricanes: 2

Sources: NOAA, NOAA’s 2018 Hurricane Season Outlooks, at https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/outlooks/

hurricane2018/May/Slide1.JPG; NOAA, NOAA’s Updated 2018 Atlantic Hurricane Season Outlook, at

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/outlooks/hurricane2018/August/Slide1.JPG; and NOAA, “Destructive

2018 Atlantic Hurricane Season Draws to an End,” November 28, 2018, at https://www.noaa.gov/media-release/

destructive-2018-atlantic-hurricane-season-draws-to-end.

In 2018, for the fourth consecutive year, hurricane activity began prior to June 1, with Tropical

Storm Alberto forming on May 25. 163 The 2018 hurricane season also featured four named storms

active at the same time. 164 Two major hurricanes affected the continental United States in 2018,

causing severe damage: Hurricane Florence and Hurricane Michael. 165 Forecasts for each of the

two major hurricanes are discussed below.

Hurricane Florence

Hurricane Florence was the first major hurricane of the 2018 season, making landfall near

Wrightsville Beach, NC, on September 14, 2018 (Figure B-1). It achieved category 4 strength

before making landfall. The maximum total rainfall of 35.93 inches was reported about 6 nautical

miles (n mi) northwest of Elizabethtown, NC. 166 In total, Hurricane Florence is linked to 52

deaths (direct and indirect) and $24 billion in wind and water damage. 167 Hurricane Florence

resulted in state rainfall records for both North Carolina and South Carolina, at 35.93 inches and

23.63 inches, respectively. Hurricane Florence also set record peak water levels in the Waccamaw

162 NOAA, “ NOAA 2018 Atlantic Hurricane Season Outlook.”

163 NOAA, “ Destructive 2018 Atlantic Hurricane Season Draws to an End,” November 28, 2018, at

https://www.noaa.gov/media-release/destructive-2018-atlantic-hurricane-season-draws-to-end. Hereafter NOAA,

“ Destructive 2018,” 2018.

164 NOAA, “ Destructive 2018,” 2018.

165 NOAA NHC, “ 2018 Atlantic Hurricane Season,” at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/index.php?season=2018&

basin=atl. Hereafter NHC, “2018 Atlantic Hurricane Season.”

166 Stewart and Berg, Hurricane Florence, 2019.

167 Stewart and Berg, Hurricane Florence, 2019, pp. 8-9.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

River in Freeland, NC, and the Little Pee Dee River in Galivants Ferry, SC, with the river

reaching peak flood levels a month after Hurricane Florence made landfall. 168

Figure B-1. Hurricane Florence’s Track

August 31, 2018, through September 17, 2018

Source: Stacy R. Stewart and Robbie Berg, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Florence,

2019, at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL062018_Florence.pdf.

Notes: Numbers along the hurricane track indicate dates (e.g., 14 denotes September 14, 2018). The small

arrow indicates the point where the hurricane reached its lowest recorded pressure (937 millibars).

The NHC track forecast for Florence was better than average, meaning the forecast errors were

lower than the average official forecast errors for hurricanes during the previous five-year period

(2013-2017, Table B-2). The accuracy of the official NHC intensity forecast for Hurricane

Florence generally had higher forecast errors than the previous five-year average forecasts (Table

B-3). The previous five-year average intensity forecasts were better than the Hurricane Florence

forecasts for all but the 120 hour period. 169 NHC indicated that the errors were due to the storm’s

unexpected first rapid intensification (RI) and its unanticipated rapid weakening. NHC noted that

“the second RI period was anticipated and thus better forecast, albeit the time of peak intensity

was about 18h later and 10 kt higher than what occurred.”170

168 Stewart and Berg, Hurricane Florence, 2019, p. 7, and NOAA, “ Destructive 2018,” 2018.

169 A knot (kt) is 1 nautical mile per hour (mph), equivalent to approximately 1.15 mph.

170 Stewart and Berg, Hurricane Florence, 2019, p. 15.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

Table B-2. NHC Official Track Forecast Errors for Hurricane Florence Compared

with the 2013-2017 Average

in nautical miles

Forecast

Forecast Period

12 Hours

24 Hours

36 Hours

48 Hours

72 Hours

96 Hours

120 Hours

NHC

Official

18.3

30.8

40.8

50.2

71.5

115.7

155.7

2013-2017

Averages

24.1

37.4

50.5

66.6

98.4

137.4

180.7

Sources: Stacy R. Stewart and Robbie Berg, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Florence,

2019, p. 74, at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL062018_Florence.pdf; and email correspondence with

NOAA Office of Legislative Affairs, May 14, 2020.

Notes: Forecast errors indicate the difference between the forecast track and the actual track in nautical miles.

NHC issues official forecasts every 6 hours, and each forecast has projections valid 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and

120 hours after the forecast’s initial time.

According to NOAA, forecast errors are compared with a five-year period of average errors, as the five-year

period is 1) recent with respect to the state of the science and 2) includes a large number of tropical cyclones to

allow for robust statistical analysis.

Table B-3. NHC Official Intensity Forecast Errors for Hurricane Florence Compared

with the 2013-2017 Average

in nautical miles per hour, or knots

Forecast

Forecast Period

12 Hours

24 Hours

36 Hours

48 Hours

72 Hours

96 Hours

120 Hours

NHC

Official

6.3

12.7

16.1

18.1

22.5

17.3

13.3

2013-2017

Averages

5.5

8.0

10.0

11.4

12.7

14.5

15.0

Sources: Stacy R. Stewart and Robbie Berg, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Florence,

2019, p. 76, at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL062018_Florence.pdf; and email correspondence with

NOAA Office of Legislative Affairs, May 14, 2020.

Notes: Forecast errors indicate the difference between the forecast intensity and the actual intensity in nautical

miles per hour, or knots.

NHC issues official forecasts every 6 hours, and each forecast has projections valid 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and

120 hours after the forecast’s initial time.

According to NOAA, forecast errors are compared with a five-year period of average errors, as the five-year

period is 1) recent with respect to the state of the science and 2) includes a large number of tropical cyclones to

allow for robust statistical analysis.

NHC issued storm surge warnings for parts of North Carolina and South Carolina. According to

NHC, it “provided an accurate portrayal of the storm surge inundation risk in the area that

received the worst coastal flooding.”171 Furthermore, “the initial Potential Storm Surge Flooding

Map’s inundation values were slightly high (which is not unexpected), but the map provided an

171 Stewart and Berg, Hurricane Florence, 2019, p. 17.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

accurate representation of the ultimate storm surge footprint and a depiction of the areas most at

risk of the highest storm surge despite the hurricane’s evolving structure and intensity.”172

Hurricane Michael

Hurricane Michael was the second major hurricane to strike the conterminous U.S. coast in 2018,

making landfall near Mexico Beach and Tyndall Air Force Base, FL, at category 5 strength—

which was unprecedented for the region—on October 10, 2018 (Figure B-2). Hurricane Michael

was originally recorded as a high-end category 4 storm, but upon post-storm analysis, it was

upgraded to category 5. 173 According to NHC, Hurricane Michael was “the strongest hurricane on

record to strike the Florida panhandle, and was the third-most-intense hurricane to make landfall

in the continental U.S. in terms of central pressure (919 mb) and the fourth-strongest in terms of

maximum sustained winds (155 mph).”174 In total, 59 deaths (direct and indirect) and $25 billion

in wind and water damages were linked to Hurricane Michael. 175 Hurricane Michael’s landfall

marks the latest date of a category 5 hurricane landfall in the United States. 176 Hurricane Michael

produced high storm surge, peaking at about 14 feet near Mexico Beach, FL, in addition to

significant wave activity along the shoreline. 177

172 Stewart and Berg, Hurricane Florence, 2019, p. 17.

173 NOAA, “ Hurricane Michael Upgraded to a Category 5 at time of U.S. Landfall,” April 19, 2019, at

https://www.noaa.gov/media-release/hurricane-michael-upgraded-to-category-5-at-time-of-us-landfall. Hereafter

NOAA, “Hurricane Michael Upgraded,” 2019.

174 NOAA, “ Destructive 2018,” 2018.

175

John L. Beven II, Robbie Berg, and Andrew Hagan, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report:

Hurricane Michael, NOAA, 2019, p. 11, at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL142018_Michael.pdf. Hereafter

Beven, Berg, and Hagan, Hurricane Michael, 2019.

176 Beven, Berg, and Hagan, Hurricane Michael, 2019, p. 6.

177 Beven, Berg, and Hagan, Hurricane Michael, 2019, p. 8.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

Figure B-2. Hurricane Michael’s Track

October 7, 2018, through October 11, 2018

Source: John L. Beven II, Robbie Berg, and Andrew Hagan, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report:

Hurricane Michael, 2019, at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL142018_Michael.pdf.

Notes: Numbers along the hurricane track indicate dates (e.g., 10 denotes October 10, 2018).

The NHC track forecast for Hurricane Michael had smaller forecast errors than the previous fiveyear period (Table B-4). According to NHC, the forecasts were “less skillful during two periods”:

(1) during its initial movement from the Caribbean Sea into the Gulf of Mexico, and (2) when

tracking the storm through South Carolina and North Carolina. 178

178 Beven, Berg, and Hagan, Hurricane Michael, 2019, pp. 12.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

Table B-4. NHC Official Track Forecast Errors for Hurricane Michael Compared with

the 2013-2017 Average

in nautical miles

Forecast

Forecast Period

12 Hours

24 Hours

36 Hours

48 Hours

72 Hours

96 Hours

120

Hours

NHC

Official

20.0

34.5

47.1

45.9

64.4

85.2

N/A

2013-2017

Averages

24.1

37.4

50.5

66.6

98.4

137.4

N/A

Sources: John L. Beven II, Robbie Berg, and Andrew Hagan, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report:

Hurricane Michael, 2019, p. 66, at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL142018_Michael.pdf; and email

correspondence with NOAA Office of Legislative Affairs, May 14, 2020.

Notes: Forecast errors indicate the difference between the forecast track and the actual track in nautical miles.

NHC issues official forecasts every 6 hours, and each forecast has projections valid 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and

120 hours after the forecast’s initial time.

According to NOAA, forecast errors are compared with a five-year period of average errors, as the five-year

period is 1) recent with respect to the state of the science and 2) includes a large number of tropical cyclones to

allow for robust statistical analysis.

The intensity forecast errors for Hurricane Michael were greater than the five-year period

averages in all cases except the 96-hour period (Table B-5). NHC acknowledged that Hurricane

Michael intensified more quickly than anticipated, despite a moderate-to-strong wind shear,

which may have undermined later predictions, as the forecasted intensity was greater than the

actual storm intensity. 179

Table B-5. NHC Official Intensity Forecast Errors for Hurricane Michael

Compared with the 2013-2017 Average

in nautical miles per hour, or knots

Forecast

Forecast Period

12 Hours

24 Hours

36 Hours

48 Hours

72 Hours

96 Hours

12 Hours

NHC

Official

6.8

12.3

14.6

19.1

24.3

3.3

N/A

2013-2017

Averages

5.5

8.0

10.1

11.4

12.7

14.5

N/A

Sources: John L. Beven II, Robbie Berg, and Andrew Hagan, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report:

Hurricane Michael, 2019, p. 68, at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL142018_Michael.pdf; and email

correspondence with NOAA Office of Legislative Affairs, May 14, 2020.

Notes: Forecast errors indicate the difference between the forecast intensity and the actual intensity in nautical

miles per hour, or knots.

NHC issues official forecasts every 6 hours, and each forecast has projections valid 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and

120 hours after the forecast’s initial time.

179 Beven, Berg, and Hagan, Hurricane Michael, 2019, p. 13. Wind shear refers to how wind changes speed and

direction with height. NWS, “Severe Weather T opics,” at https://www.weather.gov/ilx/swop-springtopics.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

According to NOAA, forecast errors are compared with a five-year period of average errors, as the five-year

period is 1) recent with respect to the state of the science and 2) includes a large number of tropical cyclones to

allow for robust statistical analysis.

NHC issued several storm surge watches and warnings along the coasts of North Carolina and

Florida related to Hurricane Michael. NHC did not comment on the accuracy of its storm surge

warnings in its post-hurricane report. 180

2018 Eastern Pacific Hurricane Season Overview

NOAA predicted 14-20 named storms for the 2018 eastern Pacific hurricane season (Table B-6).

The actual total was 22 named storms.

Table B-6. 2018 Eastern Pacific Hurricane Season: Comparison Between Seasonal

Outlook and Actual Storms

NOAA Seasonal Outlook (May 2018)

Actual

Named Storms: 14-20

Named Storms: 22

Hurricanes: 7-12

Hurricanes: 12

Major Hurricanes: 3-7

Major Hurricanes: 9

Sources: NOAA, “Forecasters predict a near- or above-normal 2018 Atlantic hurricane season,” at

https://www.noaa.gov/media-release/forecasters-predict-near-or-above-normal-2018-atlantic-hurricane-season;

and NOAA, “2018 Monthly Tropical Cyclone Summary,” at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/tws/?yyyy=2018&

bb=EP&mm=11.

Notes: Other NOAA sources include an additional storm, Hurricane Walaka, in their total a ctual numbers for

2018. Hurricane Walaka formed in the central Pacific and passed over Johnson Atoll and several northwestern

Hawaiian Islands. Hurricane Walaka is neither included in the counts above nor described in the rest of the

report. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, “Hurricanes and Tropical Storms – Annual

2018,” at https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/tropical-cyclones/201813#pac.

According to NOAA, the 2018 eastern Pacific hurricane season was very active, with the number

of named storms, hurricanes, and major hurricanes higher than the May 2018 seasonal outlook

and 1981 to 2010 averages. 181 The year 2018 ties with the years 1982 and 1985, as years with the

second highest number of named storms in a season for the eastern Pacific. 182 No major

hurricanes made landfall in Hawaii in 2018, although several damaging tropical cyclones (Lane

and Olivia, described below) passed near or over the islands. 183 Both of the storms originated in

the eastern Pacific and moved westward into the central Pacific. According to NOAA, the 2018

eastern Pacific hurricane season had the highest recorded accumulated cyclone energy (ACE)

index, a wind energy index calculated from maximum sustained surface wind speed

measurements taken every six hours for all named storms while they are at least tropical storm

180

Beven, Berg, and Hagan, Hurricane Michael, 2019.

181 NOAA, “Forecasters predict a near- or above-normal 2018 Atlantic hurricane season,” at https://www.noaa.gov/

media-release/forecasters-predict-near-or-above-normal-2018-atlantic-hurricane-season; and NOAA National Centers

for Environmental Information, “Hurricanes and T ropical Storms – Annual 2018,” at https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/

tropical-cyclones/201813#pac. Hereafter NOAA, “Annual 2018.”

182 NOAA, “Annual 2018.”

183 NOAA, “Annual 2018.” Four major Pacific Ocean hurricanes did make landfall in Mexico in 2018.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

intensity. 184 The ACE index for the eastern Pacific basin during 2018 was 316, almost three times

the 1981 to 2010 average of 132.

Hurricane Lane

Hurricane Lane was the first major storm of the 2018 eastern Pac ific hurricane season to affect

the United States. 185 Hurricane Lane passed close to Hawaii from August 23 to August 26 as a

category 4 storm (Figure B-3). According to NOAA, Hurricane Lane set the state of Hawaii

record for tropical cyclone total rainfall, with one location on the Big Island measuring 58 inches

of total rainfall from the storm. 186 As the storm moved across the islands, it produced freshwater

flooding and gusty winds, causing at least $20 million in damage to public infrastructure on the

Big Island, another $2 million in damage on Maui, and over $1.5 million in damage to Kauai. 187

In addition to the rains, strong winds preceding the storm helped spread wildfires on Maui that

resulted in over $4 million in damage. 188

184

NOAA, “Annual 2018.”

185 John L. Beven II, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report - Hurricane Lane, NOAA, April 2, 2019, at

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/EP142018_Lane.pdf. Hereafter Beven, Hurricane Lane, 2019.

186 NOAA, “2018 Summary for the Central Pacific Basin.”

187 NOAA, “2018 Summary for the Central Pacific Basin.”

188 NOAA, “2018 Summary for the Central Pacific Basin.”

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

Figure B-3. Hurricane Lane’s Track

August 15, 2018 - August 28, 2018

Source: John L. Beven II, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report - Hurricane Lane, April 2, 2019, at

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/EP142018_Lane.pdf.

Notes: Numbers along the hurricane track indicate dates (e.g., 23 denotes August 23, 2018). The small arrow

indicating 926 milllibars indicates the lowest pressure recorded for the storm along this track.

The NHC track forecast was more accurate than the previous five-year period. NHC does not

offer an explanation for the results (Table B-7). 189 According to NOAA, the NHC track forecasts

performed better than most other models, with several exceptions. 190

Table B-7. NHC Official Track Forecast Errors for Hurricane Lane Compared with

the 2013-2017 Average

in nautical miles

Forecast

Forecast Period

12 Hours

24 Hours

36 Hours

48 Hours

72 Hours

96 Hours

120 Hours

NHC

Official

18.9

25.9

28.4

30.3

50.2

71.7

82.1

2013-2017

Averages

21.8

33.2

43.0

53.9

80.7

111.1

150.5

189 Beven, Hurricane Lane, 2019, pp. 3-4.

190 Beven, Hurricane Lane, 2019, p. 4.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

Sources: John L. Beven II, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report - Hurricane Lane, NOAA, April 2,

2019, p. 14, at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/EP142018_Lane.pdf; and email correspondence with NOAA

Office of Legislative Affairs, May 14, 2020.

Notes: Forecast errors indicate the difference between the forecast track and the actual track in nautical miles.

NHC issues official forecasts every 6 hours, and each forecast has projections valid 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and

120 hours after the forecast’s initial time.

According to NOAA, forecast errors are compared with a five-year period of average errors, as the five-year

period is 1) recent with respect to the state of the science and 2) includes a large number of tropical cyclones to

allow for robust statistical analysis.

The NHC intensity forecasts for Hurricane Lane were more accurate than the previous five-year

period for the first 48 hours, and they were less accurate than the previous five-year period

between 72 and 120 hours out (Table B-8). According to NHC, the forecasts anticipated

Hurricane Lane’s rapid intensification into a major hurricane in the eastern Pacific (with

subsequent weakening) but did not expect the hurricane’s reintensification in the central

Pacific. 191

Table B-8. NHC Official Intensity Forecast Errors for Hurricane Lane

Compared with the 2013-2017 Average

in nautical miles per hour, or knots

Forecast

Forecast Period

12 Hours

24 Hours

36 Hours

48 Hours

72 Hours

96 Hours

120 Hours

NHC

Official

3.2

6.9

7.8

7.5

15.9

26.9

35.9

2013-2017

Averages

5.8

9.6

11.8

13.2

15.1

14.6

Sources: John L. Beven II, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report - Hurricane Lane, NOAA, April 2,

2019, p. 16, at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/EP142018_Lane.pdf; and email correspondence with NOAA

Office of Legislative Affairs, May 14, 2020.

Notes: Forecast errors indicate the difference between the forecast intensity and the actual intensity in nautical

miles per hour, or knots.

NHC issues official forecasts every 6 hours, and each forecast has projections valid 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and

120 hours after the forecast’s initial time.

According to NOAA, forecast errors are compared with a five-year period of average errors, as the five-year

period is 1) recent with respect to the state of the science and 2) includes a large number of tropical cyclones to

allow for robust statistical analysis.

Hurricane Olivia

Hurricane Olivia reached a category 4 at its peak in the eastern Pacific Ocean (Figure B-4).192 It

weakened as it crossed into the central Pacific Ocean and moved across Hawaii as a tropical

storm. Tropical Storm Olivia made landfall on September 12, 2018, twice: (1) 10 nm northwest of

Kahului, Maui, and (2) 6 nm north-northwest of Lanai City, Lanai. 193 Tropical Storm Olivia

resulted in an extended period of heavy rainfall and flash flooding across the state, including 11 to

191 Beven, Hurricane Lane, 2019, p. 4.

John P. Cangialosi and Jon Jelsema, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report – Hurricane Olivia,

NOAA, July 25, 2019, at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/EP172018_Olivia.pdf, p. 6. Hereafter Cangialosi and

Jelsema, Hurricane Olivia, 2019

192

193 Cangialosi and Jelsema, Hurricane Olivia, 2019, p. 6.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

13 inches of rain over 48 hours in parts of Molokai, Maui, and Oahu. 194 According to NOAA, no

casualties were reported in association with Olivia, and no official estimates of damages are

available. 195

Figure B-4. Hurricane Olivia’s Track

September 1, 2018 - September 14, 2018

Source: John P. Cangialosi and Jon Jelsema, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report – Hurricane Olivia,

NOAA, July 25, 2019, at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/EP172018_Olivia.pdf.

Notes: Numbers along the hurricane track indicate dates (e.g., 10 denotes October 10, 2018).

The official NHC track forecast was more accurate than the previous five-year averages for all

forecast times (Table B-9). 196 The 120-hour error for Hurricane Olivia was the lowest track

forecast error on record in the eastern Pacific region for tropical cyclones with 20 or more

forecasts at the time of the report. 197

194 Cangialosi and Jelsema, Hurricane Olivia, 2019, p. 6.

195 Cangialosi and Jelsema, Hurricane Olivia, 2019, p. 7.

196 Cangialosi and Jelsema, Hurricane Olivia, 2019, p. 7.

197 Cangialosi and Jelsema, Hurricane Olivia, 2019, pp. 7-8.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

Table B-9. NHC Official Track Forecast Errors for Hurricane Olivia

Compared with the 2013-2017 Average

in nautical miles

Forecast

Forecast Period

12 Hours

24 Hours

36 Hours

48 Hours

72 Hours

96 Hours

120 Hours

NHC

Official

17.5

26.7

32.3

38.1

49.4

57.0

61.3

2013-2017

Averages

21.8

33.2

43.0

53.9

80.7

111.1

150.5

Sources: John P. Cangialosi and Jon Jelsema, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report – Hurricane Olivia,

NOAA, July 25, 2019, p. 16, at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/EP172018_Olivia.pdf; and email

correspondence with NOAA Office of Legislative Affairs, May 14, 2020.

Notes: Forecast errors indicate the difference between the forecast track and the actual track in nautical miles.

NHC issues official forecasts every 6 hours, and each forecast has projections valid 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and

120 hours after the forecast’s initial time.

According to NOAA, forecast errors are compared with a five-year period of average errors, as the five-year

period is 1) recent with respect to the state of the science and 2) includes a large number of tropical cyclones to

allow for robust statistical analysis.

The intensity forecasts for Hurricane Olivia were more accurate than the five-year period for the

36-hour and 72-hour periods but less accurate for all other forecast periods (Table B-10).

According to NHC, the largest contributor to the forecast errors were low biases during the two

intensification phases. 198

Table B-10. NHC Official Intensity Forecast Errors for Hurricane Olivia Compared

with the 2013-2017 Average

in nautical miles per hour, or knots

Forecast

Forecast Period

12 Hours

24 Hours

36 Hours

48 Hours

72 Hours

96 Hours

12 Hours

NHC

Official

8.0

10.6

11.7

13.8

15.0

16.2

2013-2017

Averages

5.8

9.6

11.8

13.2

15.1

14.6

Sources: John P. Cangialosi and Jon Jelsema, National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report – Hurricane Olivia,

NOAA, July 25, 2019, p. 18, at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/EP172018_Olivia.pdf; and email

correspondence with NOAA Office of Legislative Affairs, May 14, 2020.

Notes: Forecast errors indicate the difference between the forecast intensity and the actual intensity in nautical

miles per hour, or knots.

NHC issues official forecasts every 6 hours, and each forecast has projections valid 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, and

120 hours after the forecast’s initial time.

According to NOAA, forecast errors are compared with a five-year period of average errors, as the five-year

period is 1) recent with respect to the state of the science and 2) includes a large number of tropical cyclones to

allow for robust statistical analysis.

198 Cangialosi and Jelsema, Hurricane Olivia, 2019, p. 8.

Congressional Research Service

Forecasting Tropical Cyclones: Overview and Issues for Congress

2018 Central Pacific Hurricane Season Overview

In 2018, NOAA predicted the formation of three to six tropical cyclones, including tropical

depressions, named storms, and hurricanes for the central Pacific region, in near- to above-normal

conditions (Error! Not a valid bookmark self-reference.). A near-normal season in the central

Pacific has three to five tropical cyclones, and an above-normal season has six or more tropical

cyclones. 199

A total of six tropical cyclones formed or impacted the central Pacific region in 2018. 200 Of the

six tropical cyclones, two storms—Lane and Olivia, described in the sections entitled “Hurricane

Lane” and “Hurricane Olivia”—originated in the eastern Pacific, moved west, and had impacts on

Hawaii.

Table B-11. 2018 Central Pacific Tropical Cyclone Season:

Comparison Between Seasonal Outlook and Actual Storms

NOAA Seasonal Outlook (May 2018)

Actual

Tropical Cyclones: 3-6

Tropical Cyclones: 6

Sources: NOAA, “NOAA Predicts a near- or above-normal 2018 hurricane season in the Central Pacific,” May

23, 2018, at https://www.noaa.gov/media-release/noaa-predicts-near-or-above-normal-2018-hurricane-season-incentral-pacific; and NHC, “Tropical Cyclone Climatology: Central Pacific Climatology,” at

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/climo/#cpac.

Author Information

Eva Lipiec

Analyst in Natural Resources Policy

Disclaimer

This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan

shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and

under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other

than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in

connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not

subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in

its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or

material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to

copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

199 NOAA, “NOAA Predicts a near- or above-normal 2018 hurricane season in the Central Pacific,” May 23, 2018, at

https://www.noaa.gov/media-release/noaa-predicts-near-or-above-normal-2018-hurricane-season-in-central-pacific.

200 NHC, “T ropical Cyclone Climatology: Central Pacific Climatology,” at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/climo/#cpac.

Congressional Research Service

R46416 · VERSION 3 · UPDATED

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.