DOE’s Proposed Regulation on Electricity Distribution Transformers

Congressional research reportJan 3, 2024

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

INSIGHTi

DOE’s Proposed Regulation on Electricity

Distribution Transformers

Updated January 3, 2024

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) regulates the energy efficiency of electricity distribution

transformers using authority under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (P.L. 94-163), as amended.

DOE issued a proposed rule on January 11, 2023, that, if finalized, would raise the minimum efficiency

standards for certain types of distribution transformers manufactured and sold into commerce. DOE has

stated this may require switching to a new type of steel for one part of the transformer. Certain electric

power trade groups have cited supply chain challenges that may impact the availability of this type of

steel. DOE has stated that the supply is expected to meet the increased demand.

Regulations for Distribution Transformers

Congress first required DOE to set legally-binding energy conservation standards for distribution

transformers in the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (P.L. 102-486), provided that such standards “would be

technologically feasible and economically justified, and would result in significant energy savings.” 42

U.S.C. §6317(a)(1). DOE first published standards for two types of transformers in October 2007, with a

compliance date in January 2010. Congress set standards for a third type in the Energy Policy Act of 2005

(P.L. 109-58). 10 C.F.R. §431.196.

DOE Rulemakings and Types of Steel

Transformers change the input voltage of power transported via the electric grid, stepping it up or down

as necessary, to synchronize different components and stabilize the grid. (For more discussion of

transformers, see CRS Insight IN12048 or CRS In Focus IF12253.) The parts of a transformer include a

steel core, wrapped by insulated electrical wires. Grain-oriented electrical steel (GOES) has been the

dominant material in distribution transformer cores; amorphous steel is another category. DOE previously

had found that “amorphous [steel] is the lowest-loss grade and a practical necessity to reach the very

highest efficiency levels.” The very thin nature of the amorphous steel ribbons can reduce energy loss.

The 2023 proposed rule, however, does not dictate the choice of steel.

Congressional Research Service

https://crsreports.congress.gov

IN12179

CRS INSIGHT

Prepared for Members and

Committees of Congress

Congressional Research Service

2

Whether there is sufficient domestic manufacturing capacity for transformer steel has been debated. For

example, in a June 2019 notice, DOE explained that several years earlier more stringent standards were

not adopted owing to the “limitations in the available supply” of the amorphous steel. At the time, DOE

noted amorphous steel was “available in significant volume from one supplier whose annual production

capacity is below the amount that would be required to meet the demand.” A 2022 DOE report found that

domestic GOES manufacturing could not meet domestic demand for the highest quality steel at prices

comparable to imported GOES.

More recently, DOE has reconsidered the supply risk of amorphous steel and any impacts of new

standards. In the 2023 proposed rule, DOE noted that “[a]morphous manufacturers response to earlier

standards demonstrates that amorphous capacity can be added quickly” and further that “[s]takeholders

have expressed willingness to increase supply to match any potential demand created by an amended

efficiency standard.” In contrast, Eaton, a transformer manufacturer, submitted a public comment to the

proposed rule stating: “Technology and process development to accommodate amorphous steel will

exacerbate existing labor and material supply issues.”

Supply of Electrical Steel

Types of Electrical Steel Discussed in the DOE Rulemaking

According to DOE’s analysis document (p. 3A-4) accompanying the January 2023 proposed rule, the only

current domestic makers of GOES and amorphous steel are Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. and Japanese-owned

Metglas, respectively. Metglas asserts that it can install additional domestic capacity quickly. DOE noted

other GOES sources exist in Russia, China, and the European Union. An industry report listed the major

amorphous steel producers as being in Japan, China, and the European Union.

Status of Supply of Electrical Steel

The National Rural Electrical Cooperative Association asserted that, due to various factors, “orders for

distribution transformers that previously were filled in two to four months now take between 22 to 33

months to complete.” DOE has joined with industry CEOs “to identify the challenges facing the energy

sector and what solutions could help to address this issue.” DOE’s May 2023 critical materials assessment

identified electrical steel as a “near-critical material.”

In June 2022, President Biden authorized DOE to use the Defense Production Act (DPA) (50 U.S.C.

§§4501 et seq.) to address domestic production of critical energy components including transformers. A

recent draft bill, the “Clean Electricity and Transmission Acceleration Act of 2023,” would authorize

additional funding under the DPA for GOES. CRS Report R43767 discusses the DPA in detail.

Other Programs on Transformers

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA, P.L. 117-58) appropriated $10 million in rebates for

transformers. The categories eligible for rebates include two of the three transformer categories DOE

regulates.

Recent Developments

On December 5, 2023, the House Committee on Energy and Commerce reported H.R. 4167, the

“Protecting America’s Distribution Transformer Supply Chain Act,” that would prevent DOE from

Congressional Research Service

3

updating the transformer regulations for five years. Senator Barrasso (WY) had introduced a companion

bill, S. 2036, on June 15, 2023.

Section 307 of H.R. 4394, the “Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations

Act, 2024,” would prevent DOE from using funds to finalize the proposed rule. Amendment #24 struck

Section 307 and would allow the proposed rule to proceed.

Congressional Interest

Forty-seven Senators wrote a letter to Energy Secretary Granholm on June 1, 2023, urging DOE to

“finalize a rule that does not exacerbate the shortage in distribution transformers.” At an April 20, 2023,

hearing of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, Senator Hyde-Smith asked Secretary

Granholm about the impact of the proposed standard, asking whether users might expect “long lead times,

up to 2 to 4 years and more” owing to “more expensive and limited types of steel” needed to comply with

the standard. Secretary Granholm stated that DOE “would like the Defense Production Act to supply more

funding to be able to incentivize manufacturers to open up more manufacturing” and noted that while

DOE allocated $75 million for DPA activities in FY2024, of the $500 million appropriated in the Inflation

Reduction Act that amount likely would not be enough.

Author Information

Martin C. Offutt

Analyst in Energy Policy

Disclaimer

This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff

to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of

Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of

information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.

CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United

States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,

as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the

permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

IN12179 · VERSION 26 · UPDATED

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.