U.S.-Japan Critical Minerals Agreement

Congressional research reportMay 17, 2023

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

INSIGHTi

U.S.-Japan Critical Minerals Agreement

Updated May 17, 2023

On March 28, the United States and Japan signed a critical minerals agreement (CMA), which entered

into force immediately upon signature without requiring congressional approval. The Office of the U.S.

Trade Representative (USTR) stated that the CMA builds on the 2020 U.S.-Japan Trade Agreement

(USJTA), a limited trade deal.

The U.S.-Japan CMA addresses Japan’s concerns regarding certain critical mineral content requirements

for the clean vehicle (commonly referred to as electric vehicle or “EV”) tax credit included in P.L. 117169, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA). According to a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)

from the U.S. Treasury Department, released on March 31, and USTR’s free trade agreement (FTA) list,

the Biden Administration is categorizing the CMA as an FTA under a new but separate category for the

purposes of the EV tax credit.

This CMA raises issues for Congress regarding the broader U.S.-Japan trade relationship and implications

for the debate over congressional and executive trade authorities, particularly related to ongoing

negotiations like the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF).

U.S.-Japan Automotive Trade and Investment Snapshot

The auto sector plays a major role in the U.S.-Japan economic relationship. In 2022, the United States

imported $48.2 billion in vehicles/parts from Japan and exported $2.2 billion to Japan. Since 1982,

Japanese automakers have invested a total of $60.4 billion in U.S. manufacturing facilities. Several

Japanese automakers have announced plans to invest in EV and EV battery manufacturing capabilities at

both new and existing U.S. facilities. These announcements are likely in anticipation of global regulatory

and market shifts toward EVs, as well as regional content and assembly requirements in recent U.S.

legislation like the IRA and FTAs like the 2020 United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. The USJTA

covers tariffs on some goods, but not the automotive sector.

Agreement Background and Overview

The IRA provides consumers a tax credit of up to $7,500 for new EVs (26 U.S.C. §30D). Vehicles must

meet various requirements, including prohibitions on sourcing critical minerals and components used in

the EV’s batteries from “foreign entities of concern” (e.g., China, a leading processor of EV critical

minerals). In particular, the $3,750 critical minerals-related portion of the credit requires a certain

Congressional Research Service

https://crsreports.congress.gov

IN12152

CRS INSIGHT

Prepared for Members and

Committees of Congress

Congressional Research Service

percentage by value, increasing over time, of an EV battery’s critical minerals to be extracted or

processed in the United States or in a U.S. FTA partner, or recycled in North America.

The CMA defines “critical minerals” as cobalt, graphite, lithium, manganese, and nickel—all key EV

production inputs. Japan is not a major critical minerals source but possesses processing and production

capabilities. Among other measures, including a broad security exemption, the United States and Japan

agreed to

•

•

•

•

Maintain the “current practice” of not imposing export duties on critical minerals trade

between their countries;

Confer on potential domestic measures to address non-market policies and practices of

other countries affecting critical minerals trade and supply chains;

Confer on best practices regarding review of critical minerals sector investments within

their territories by foreign entities; and,

Cooperate to discourage the importation of goods containing critical minerals that

involve forced labor.

In the NPRM, the Biden Administration is using the following criteria to categorize the new U.S.-Japan

CMA as an FTA:

•

•

•

•

Reduces or eliminates trade barriers on a preferential basis;

Commits the parties to refrain from imposing new trade barriers;

Establishes high-standard disciplines in key areas affecting trade (such as core

labor/environmental protections); and/or

Reduces or eliminates restrictions on exports or commits the parties to refrain from

imposing such restrictions.

The guidance went into effect on April 18. The public has until June 16 to submit comments and requests

for a public hearing.

Some Members of Congress have raised concerns about the CMA, including, for example, the lack of

binding or enforceable commitments—particularly on labor and environment—and insufficient

consultation with Congress. Some Members also criticized the Administration’s categorization of the

CMA as an FTA without congressional approval. Some Members further stated that the Administration’s

actions undermine incentives to shift supply chains from China—a key driver of the IRA provisions.

Industry groups representing Japanese automakers have expressed support for the CMA as important to

the U.S.-Japan alliance. American automakers have not commented publicly, but a group representing

both U.S.- and foreign-based automakers supports a broad definition of FTA that would include partners

like Japan and the European Union (EU). Some experts have commented that although Japan is working

toward increasing non-Chinese critical minerals sources (e.g., Australia and Canada), Japanese

automakers may struggle to meet the timeline for the increasingly stringent EV tax credit content value

requirements.

Considerations for Congress

Members may seek to engage on this issue via hearings, letters to the Administration, comments to

Treasury, and legislation. Key considerations may include

•

Congress’ role in trade policy. USTR stated that it would consult Congress regarding

future CMA talks. It is possible, however, that the Biden Administration may use the

U.S.-Japan CMA as a template for potential CMAs with the EU and other interested

2

Congressional Research Service

•

•

•

3

parties, like Indonesia. Congress typically had set procedures and requirements for FTAs

in Trade Promotion Authority (TPA), which expired in 2021. Members may consider

Congress’s role in trade policy as part of future TPA reauthorization debates. They may

also consider whether or not to formalize approval/implementation processes for CMAs

or other initiatives under negotiation, like IPEF, which the Biden Administration has

indicated may not require congressional approval.

U.S.-Japan trade relationship. Some Members and industry groups have continued to

push for a comprehensive trade deal with Japan (e.g., additional USJTA negotiations or

joining the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership).

Members may consider whether or not agreements like the CMA are appropriate

substitutes to address concerns over market access and non-tariff barriers. Members may

also consider implications for other trade initiatives, like the U.S.-Japan Partnership on

Trade, or multilateral critical minerals discussions (e.g., the Minerals Security Partnership

and the G7).

IRA EV tax credit requirements. Members may consider whether or not to propose

legislation to further define or clarify aspects of the IRA EV tax credit requirements (e.g.,

S. 756).

Author Information

Kyla H. Kitamura

Analyst in International Trade and Finance

Disclaimer

This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff

to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of

Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of

information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.

CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United

States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,

as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the

permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

IN12152 · VERSION 3 · UPDATED

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.