Farm Bill Primer: Forestry Title
Congressional research reportJun 22, 2017
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
June 22, 2017
Farm Bill Primer: Forestry Title
Forest management generally, as well as forest research and
forestry assistance, is within the jurisdiction of the
agriculture committees in Congress. Although most forestry
programs are permanently authorized, forestry often is
addressed in the periodic farm bills to reauthorize many
agriculture programs. Four of the past five farm bills
included a separate forestry title, including the most recent
farm bill, the Agricultural Act of 2014 (P.L. 113-79; the
2014 farm bill). This report summarizes some of the
forestry provisions addressed in the 2014 farm bill and
issues Congress may debate in future farm bills.
National Forest System (NFS), which consists of 145
million acres of forestland and 48 million acres of
grasslands and woodlands. FS also provides technical and
financial assistance—primarily through state forestry
agencies—to nonfederal landowners. In addition, FS
conducts research to advance the science of forestry and
engages in international forestry assistance and research
efforts. Many of FS’s land management, assistance, and
research programs have permanent authorities and receive
appropriations annually through the discretionary
appropriations process.
Forestry in the United States
Forestry in the 2014 Farm Bill
One-third of the land area in the United States is forestland
(766 million acres, see Figure 1). These lands provide
wood for lumber, plywood, paper, and other materials, as
well as a host of ecological services, including recreation,
clean water, and wildlife habitat, among other things. The
federal government owns 238 million acres (31%) of the
forestland; 230 million (30%) acres are owned by states,
other public entities, and private corporate landowners (e.g.,
timber investment trusts). The remaining 298 million acres
(39%) are owned by nonindustrial private landowners (i.e.,
private, noncorporate entities that do not own woodprocessing facilities).
The Forest Service (FS) is housed within the U.S.
Department of Agriculture and is the principal federal forest
management agency of the United States. FS manages 19%
of all U.S. forestlands. FS administers the 193 million acre
Title VIII of the 2014 farm bill repealed, modified,
reauthorized, and created several new forestry assistance,
research, and federal land management programs. The
following sections summarize many of those provisions.
Forestry Assistance
The 2014 farm bill repealed a number of assistance
programs that had not been authorized for several years
(e.g., the Forest Land Enhancement Program), had not
received appropriations in several years (e.g., the
Watershed Forestry Assistance Program), or had never
received appropriations (e.g., the Tribal Watershed Forestry
Assistance Program).
Figure 1. Forest Cover Across the United States
Source: Congressional Research Service.
https://crsreports.congress.gov
Farm Bill Primer: Forestry Title
Several other assistance programs were reauthorized
through FY2018, such as the Rural Revitalization
Technologies Program and the Office of International
Forestry. The 2014 farm bill reauthorized funding, through
FY2018, for FS to continue providing assistance for
statewide forest resource assessments and enacted minor
program modifications. The farm bill also removed
mandatory funding for the Healthy Forests Reserve
Program but authorized appropriations of up to $12 million
annually (through FY2018) for the program and made some
changes to the program.
Forestry Research
The 2014 farm bill directed FS to revise the strategic plan
for forest inventory and analysis under the Forest and
Rangeland Renewable Resources Research Act of 1978 (16
U.S.C. 1642(e)). The strategic plan outlines the
methodology and goals of the Forest Inventory and
Analysis Program, which describes the nationwide extent of
forest resources and related data.
Forestry on Federal Lands
The 2014 farm bill established a process for designating
landscape-scale treatment areas in at least one national
forest in each state where there is declining forest health or
the risk of declining forest health due to insect and disease
infestation, if requested by the governor of the state.
Approximately 47 million acres across 36 states have
received this designation. The 2014 farm bill authorized FS
to prioritize and perform restoration projects in those areas.
The farm bill also established a Categorical Exclusion (CE)
under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) that
may be available for those projects under specified
conditions.
The 2014 farm bill permanently authorized two federal land
management programs: stewardship contracting and the
Good Neighbor Authority (GNA). Stewardship contracting
authorizes FS and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
to enter into dual service and timber sale contracts for up to
10 years to achieve certain specified land management
objectives. The GNA, which was permanently authorized
and extended nationwide, allows FS and BLM to enter into
agreements with state agencies to conduct watershed
restoration and protection projects on neighboring national
forest or BLM lands. Previously, the GNA was authorized
only in Colorado and Utah.
Forestry Provisions in Other 2014 Farm Bill Titles
Forestry-related provisions also are included in other farm
bill titles. For example, the Conservation (Title II),
Research (Title VII), Energy (Title IX), and Miscellaneous
(Title XII) titles each contain provisions related to forestry
or forest ownership.
Potential Forestry Provisions in a Future
Farm Bill
The need to consider reauthorizing many of the agricultural
programs is a prime reason for Congress to consider
periodic farm bills. Even though many forestry programs
are permanently authorized, the farm bill presents an
opportunity to modify existing programs and possibly
establish new options for forestry research, management of
federal lands, and assistance to nonfederal forest owners.
Congress may use a future farm bill to address concerns
related to forest health management on both federal and
nonfederal lands. For example, this could include programs
to reduce the risk of catastrophic disturbance events, such
as an uncharacteristically severe wildfire or insect or
disease infestations. For nonfederal forests, this may
include establishing or modifying assistance programs to
enhance wildfire protection, preparedness, and forest
resiliency. For federal forests, this may involve establishing
new authorities or expanding existing authorities to reduce
hazardous fuel levels or other forest restoration activities.
Congress also may use the farm bill to address issues
related to funding federal wildfire suppression operations
(see CRS Report R44966, Wildfire Suppression Spending:
Background, Issues, and Legislation in the 115th Congress,
for more information).
Congress may use the next farm bill to address any
unforeseen issues with provisions enacted in the 2014 farm
bill. For example, the GNA has an adjacency requirement
that many believe is restricting the application of the
program, and some support clarifying the legislative
language. Similarly, many would like Congress to address
issues with the stewardship contracting authority, such as
contract cancellation ceilings and revenue-sharing
requirements. The farm bill also may provide an
opportunity for Congress to modify or expand the insect
and disease treatment area authorities and designations.
In addition, the next farm bill may address other forestry
and federal land issues and programs, such as the
Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program. This
FS program provides funding for 23 landscape-scale
restoration projects in priority landscapes for 10 years.
Some would like to expand the program to include
additional projects, whereas others would like to phase out
the program. Congress also may address assistance issues,
such as outreach, education, research, and market
opportunities for traditional and nontraditional forest
products. For example, Congress may include programs to
incentivize the use of wood residue for renewable energy or
to expand the use of wood in construction applications (e.g.,
tall wood buildings).
Several of the forestry issues that were debated but
ultimately not included in the enacted 2014 farm bill could
resurface in future farm bills or other legislation. For
example, the House-passed version of the 2014 farm bill
(H.R. 2642) proposed to eliminate the permanent
authorizations for several programs (e.g., the Forest Legacy
Program) by establishing a sunset date. The enacted 2014
farm bill did not include these provisions, but funding
authority issues could be the subject of future deliberations.
Related CRS Reports
CRS Report R43431, Forestry Provisions in the 2014 Farm
Bill (P.L. 113-79); CRS Report RL31065, Forestry
Assistance Programs.
Katie Hoover, Specialist in Natural Resources Policy
https://crsreports.congress.gov
IF10681
Farm Bill Primer: Forestry Title
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress.
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10681 · VERSION 3 · NEW
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.