POWs and MIAs: Status and Accounting Issues

Congressional research reportFeb 16, 2006

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

Order Code IB92101

CRS Issue Brief for Congress

Received through the CRS Web

POWs and MIAs:

Status and Accounting Issues

Updated February 16, 2006

Charles A. Henning

Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division

Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress

CONTENTS

SUMMARY

MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS

Areas of Congressional Interest

Definition of Terms

U.S. POWs and MIAs in 20th Century Wars: Statistics

Vietnam War POWs and MIAs

Vietnam POW/MIAs: U.S. Government Policy and Organization

U.S.-Vietnamese Interaction on POW/MIA Issues: Recent Developments and

Issues

U.S. Policy and the Remains Issue

Congress and the POW/MIA Issue, 1993-2005 (FY1994-FY2006)

Vietnam POW/MIAs: Were Americans Left Behind? Are Any Still Alive?

The “Coverup” Issue

Have Americans Remained in Indochina Voluntarily?

Are the Vietnamese, Laotians, or Cambodians Still Holding the Remains of Dead

Americans?

Korean War POWs/MIAs

POWs and MIAs from Cold War Incidents

Post-Cold War POW/MIAs

The Persian Gulf War of 1991 (Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm)

The Speicher Case

The Ongoing Iraq War, 2003-Present: POW/MIA Matters

World War II POWs and MIAs: Soviet Imprisonment of U.S. POWs Liberated from the

Germans

FOR ADDITIONAL READING

CRS Products

IB92101

02-16-06

POWs and MIAs: Status and Accounting Issues

SUMMARY

the possibility of Americans still being held in

Indochina cannot be ruled out. Some say

Americans may have been kept by the Vietnamese after the war but killed later.

Increased U.S. access to Vietnam has not yet

led to a large reduction en masse in the number of Americans still listed as unaccounted

for, although this may be due to some U.S.

policies as well as Vietnamese non-cooperation.

There has been great controversy about

U.S. prisoners of war (POWs) and those

missing in action (MIAs) during (and in one

case after) the Cold War. While few people

familiar with the issue feel that any Americans

are still being held against their will in the

remaining communist countries, more feel that

some may have been so held in the past in the

Soviet Union, China, North Korea, or North

Vietnam. Similarly, few believe there was a

“conspiracy” to cover up live POWs, but few

would disagree with the statement that there

was, at least during the 1970s and 1980s, U.S.

government mismanagement of the issue.

There is considerable evidence that

prisoners from the end of World War II, the

Korean War, and “Cold War shootdowns” of

U.S. military aircraft may have been taken to

the USSR and not returned. The evidence

about POWs from Vietnam being taken to the

Soviet Union is more questionable. There is

evidence that Navy pilot Scott Speicher, shot

down on the first night of the 1991 Persian

Gulf War, and until recently listed as “killed

in action” rather than “missing in action,” was

almost certainly captured by the Iraqis. Information about his fate has not yet been discovered by U.S. and coalition forces in Iraq. All

American POWs captured by the Iraqis during

the initial stage of the current war were returned to U.S. control; the remains of all

others listed as MIA have been recovered.

One U.S. Army soldier, captured by Iraqi

insurgents, on April 9, 2004, is currently listed

as a POW; there has been no word about his

fate since his POW status was confirmed by

DOD on April 23, 2004.

Normalization of relations with Vietnam

exacerbated this longstanding debate. Normalization’s supporters contend that Vietnamese

cooperation on the POW/MIA issue has

greatly increased. Opponents argue that

cooperation has in fact been much less than

supporters say, and that the Vietnamese can

only be induced to cooperate by firmness

rather than conciliation. Those who believe

Americans are now held, or were after the war

ended, feel that even if no specific report of

live Americans has thus far met rigorous

proofs, the mass of information about live

Americans is compelling. Those who doubt

live Americans are still held, or were after the

war ended, argue that despite vast efforts, only

one live American military prisoner remained

in Indochina after the war (a defector who

returned in 1979). The U.S. government says

Congressional Research Service

˜

The Library of Congress

IB92101

02-16-06

MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

In early September 2005, another Navy report on the status of 1991 Gulf War Navy pilot

Capt. Michael Scott Speicher was completed. It reiterated conclusions reached in earlier

studies that he could well have been captured; that there was no specific evidence of his

death; and that some former members — they were not identified, if known — of the

Saddam Hussein government of Iraq were knowledgeable about his fate. Accordingly, it

recommended that Speicher’s status be maintained as missing, rather than killed.

BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS

Areas of Congressional Interest

This issue brief summarizes numbers of U.S. POWs and MIAs lost during the Vietnam

War (1961-1975) and the Korean War (1950-1953), compares these losses to other 20th

century American wars, and describes the POW/MIA investigation and policy process. It

discusses whether some POWs from these wars were not returned to U.S. control when the

wars ended, and whether some may still be alive. Further, it discusses whether Americans

were captured by communist countries during Cold War incidents, or after being liberated

from German POW camps at the end of World War II, and whether any such Americans are

still alive. It also summarizes POW/MIA matters and controversies related to post-Cold War

U.S. military operations, particularly the 1991 Persian Gulf War; the ongoing Global War

On Terrorism (GWOT) that began on October 7, 2001, when the United States began combat

operations against the Taliban regime in Afghanistan; and the GWOT-related Iraq war that

began on March 19, 2003. Finally, the issue brief describes legislation and congressional

oversight concerning the POW/MIA issue. For information on other aspects of U.S.-Vietnam

relations and on the current controversy over the attempt by some American former POWs

held by the Japanese during World War II to obtain compensation from Japanese

corporations, see the For Additional Reading section at the end of this issue brief.

Definition of Terms

The following terms are frequently encountered in analyses of the POW/MIA issue:

!

!

!

!

POW (Prisoner Of War): Persons known to be, or to have been, held by the

enemy as a live prisoner or last seen under enemy control.

MIA (Missing In Action): Persons removed from control of U.S. forces due

to enemy action, but not known to either be a prisoner of war or dead.

KIA-BNR (Killed In Action-Body Not Recovered): Persons known to have

been killed in action, but body or remains not recovered by U.S. forces, such

as an aircraft exploding in midair or crashing or a body lost at sea.

PFOD (Presumptive Finding Of Death): An administrative finding by the

appropriate military service Secretary, after statutory review procedures, that

there is no current evidence to indicate that a person previously listed as

MIA or POW could still be alive.

CRS-1

IB92101

!

02-16-06

Unaccounted For: An all-inclusive term — not a legal status — used to

indicate Americans initially listed as POW, MIA, KIA-BNR, or PFOD, but

about whom no further information is yet known.

Names are shifted, usually from the most uncertain status, MIA, to more certain

categories, during and after hostilities based on new information, or, in the case of a PFOD,

lack of any new information over time that indicates an individual is still living.

U.S. POWs and MIAs in

20th Century Wars: Statistics

Statistics on U.S. POWs and MIAs in Vietnam and past wars are often mutually

irreconcilable. Tables 1-3, below, as with all such material, are not always compatible in

detail, but they do provide some basis for comparison.

Table 1. U.S. POWs, World War I (1917-1918)

through the Iraq War (2003-Present)

Total

WWI WWII Korea Vietnam Persian Somalia Bosnia Kosovo

1917- 1941- 1950- 1961

Gulf

1992199519991918 1945 1953 -1973

1991

1994 Present Present

Captured &

142,233 4,120 130,201 7,140

Interned)

Returned to

U.S. Military 125,208 3,973 116,129 4,418

Control

Refused

21

0

0

21

Repatriation

Died while

17,004

147 14,072 2,701

POW

Still officially

held by

0

0

0

0

enemy forces

AfghanIraq

istan

20032001Present

Present

725

23

1

0

3

0

10

661

23

1

0

3

0

9

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

64

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1*

Sources: All data except for Iraq from Stenger, Charles A., Ph.D. American Prisoners of War in WWI, WWII,

Vietnam, Persian Gulf, Somalia, Bosnia, Kosovo, and Afghanistan: Statistical Data Concerning Numbers

Captured, Repatriated, and Still Alive as of January 1, 2003. Prepared for the DVA [Department of Veterans

Affairs] Advisory Committee on Prisoners of War. Mental Health Strategic Care Group, VHA [Veterans

Health Administration], [by] the American Ex-Prisoners of War Association. Iraq data obtained from DOD

documents and press releases, and regular press reports.

*Reports of the death of this POW, first listed as missing on April 9, 2004, and confirmed as a POW on April

23, 2004, have not been confirmed; he is still listed as captured by U.S. military authorities.

CRS-2

IB92101

02-16-06

Table 2. Americans Unaccounted For,

World War I through the Korean War

World War I (1917-18) a

Unidentified remains

World War II (1941-45)

Remains not recovered

1,648

b

78,794 c

Korean War (1950-53) d

Unaccounted for

8,100

Source: a. Bruce Callender, “The History of Arlington’s Silent Soldiers,” Air Force Times, June 19, 1984:

23.

b. U.S. Congress, House Select Committee on Missing Persons in Southeast Asia, Americans Missing in

Southeast Asia, Final Report, 94th Cong., 2nd sess., H.Rept. 94-1764, (Washington: GPO, 1976), pp. 73-74.

c. An estimated 9,000-17,000 were subject to the equivalent of a PFOD. Ibid: 74.

d. Current DPMO figure is always stated as “approximately 8,100.” Korean War POW/MIA statistics are a

mass of inconsistencies. The Final Report of the 1976 House Select Committee on Missing Persons in

Southeast Asia: 75, listed a total of 5,866 total Korean War MIA, of which 4,735 had been subjected to a

PFOD; 1,107 listed as KIA-BNR; and 24 known to be in Chinese prisons as of Sept. 30, 1954; of which all were

either eventually released or subject to a PFOD. A Rand Corp. study prepared for DPMO itemizes Korean War

unaccounted-for Americans somewhat differently, but along lines that are broadly similar to the current DPMO

figure of about 8,100- 8,140 KIA-BNR, of which the deaths of 5,945 were witnessed or otherwise welldocumented, leaving 2,195 whose death cannot be explicitly established, although many were undoubtedly

killed. Cole, Paul M. POW/MIA Issues: Volume 1, The Korean War, Rand, MR-351/1-USDP, 1994: xv-xvi.

Vietnam War POWs and MIAs

North Vietnamese and Viet Cong (South Vietnamese Communist; the so-called

“National Liberation Front”) authorities returned 591 POWs to U.S. control within the

specified two-month period after the signing of the Vietnam War peace treaty on January 27,

1973. 67 U.S. civilians, not part of the official list of Americans unaccounted for, were

trapped or stayed voluntarily after South Vietnam fell in April 1975. All were released by

late 1976. Since 1976, some Americans have been imprisoned in Vietnam (almost all for

civilian offenses) and eventually released. Most Americans now in Vietnamese prisons for

criminal offenses (some of which would be characterized as “political” crimes by the

Vietnamese authorities) are naturalized Americans of Vietnamese birth or ancestry. Since

1973, only one U.S. military member has returned alive from Vietnam. Marine Corps PFC

Robert Garwood was listed as a POW by U.S. authorities — but never by the Vietnamese

— in 1965 and returned voluntarily to the U.S. in 1979. He was convicted of collaboration

with the enemy, but his light sentence included no prison term.

After the return of the 591 POWs, 2,583 Americans were unaccounted for (not counting

civilians trapped in Vietnam after the South fell, or who later visited Vietnam). Identified

remains of 768 Americans have been returned from Vietnam (540), Laos (197), Cambodia

(28), and China (3) since the war ended on January 27, 1973. Of the 1,815 still listed as

unaccounted for as of August 5, 2005, DOD is still actively seeking to recover the remains

of 1,148. DOD believes that, based on currently available information and its analysis, it will

be unable to ever recover the remains of the other 667. Examples of the latter would include

the 468 men lost over water, as stated in the note to Table 3, which summarizes data on

CRS-3

IB92101

02-16-06

Americans currently unaccounted for in Southeast Asia. Another example would be those

crewmen of aircraft that, at the time, were observed by both Vietnamese and Americans to

have exploded without any sign of the crew ejecting; and similar situations.

Vietnam POW/MIAs: U.S. Government Policy and Organization. Since 1982,

the official U.S. position regarding live Americans has been as follows: “Although we have

thus far been unable to prove that Americans are still being held against their will, the

information available to us precludes ruling out that possibility. Actions to investigate

live-sighting reports receive and will continue to receive necessary priority and resources

based on the assumption that at least some Americans are still held captive. Should any

report prove true, we will take appropriate action to ensure the return of those involved.”

Table 3. Americans Unaccounted for in Southeast Asia

(as of August 5, 2005)

Service

Army

Navy

Marine Corps

Air Force

Coast Guard

Civilians

Total

N. Vietnam S. Vietnam

9

450

263

89

22

174

193

160

0

0

1

20

488

893

Country of Loss

Laos

Cambodia

95

24

19

0

16

8

234

18

0

0

8

5

372

55

China

0

7

0

0

0

0

7

Total

578

378

220

605

0

34

1,815

Source: Department of Defense. All U.S. servicemembers are currently listed by DOD as KIA-BNR or, if

formerly listed as a POW or MIA, a PFOD has been made. Until 1994, one POW, a pilot whose capture and

POW status were verified, remained listed as a POW for symbolic reasons. His status was changed to KIABNR at the request of his family. The total of 1,815 personnel includes 468 lost at sea or over water.

The Director of the DOD Prisoner of War/Missing Personnel Office (DPMO), who also

serves as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for POW/Missing Personnel Affairs

(DASD POW/MIA), provides overall direction and control of DOD POW/MIA matters,

both for previous conflicts and the formulation of policies and procedures for future

circumstances in which U.S. military personnel could become POWs or MIA. Field activities

in Indochina and elsewhere around the world related to POW/MIA accounting is supervised

by DOD’s Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command (JPAC), headquartered in Hawaii. JPAC

maintains POW/MIA files, conducts research and interviews in Indochina and elsewhere in

Asia with refugees and others, and staffs U.S. POW/MIA operations in Indochina. JPAC’s

Central Identification Laboratory-Hawaii (CIL-HI) identifies returned remains from around

the world. (JPAC was formerly called Joint Task Force — Full Accounting, or JTF-FA.)

(Some identifications have little or no current foreign policy relevance. World War II-related

recovery of remains, or researches, have taken place in Hungary, China, New Guinea, Betio

Island in Tarawa atoll in the Pacific, and Libya.)

POW/MIA information comes from refugees and other human contacts and assets,

physical evidence (such as “dog tags” worn by U.S. military personnel, photographs, and

CRS-4

IB92101

02-16-06

aircraft debris), communications intelligence and aerial reconnaissance, and open sources.

Between the fall of South Vietnam in April 1975 and August 5, 2005, according to DOD,

22,677 reports “possibly pertaining to Americans in Southeast Asia” have been acquired by

the U.S. government, including 1,976 alleged first-hand sightings. Of the 1,976, fully 1,942

(98.28%) have, according to DPMO, been resolved. More specifically, 67.86% (1,341)

correlate with persons since accounted for (i.e., returned live or known dead); another

28.14% (556) have been determined to be fabrications; and 2.28% (45) correlate to wartime

(pre-mid-1975) sightings of Americans, either military or civilian. The remaining 34,or

1.72%, involve sightings of Americans in either a captive (31) or non-captive (3)

environment, and “represent the focus of DPMO analytical and collection efforts.” Of the

34, 24 were reported to have occurred prior to 1976; 4 between 1976 and 1995; and 6 during

the period 1996-present.

U.S.-Vietnamese Interaction on POW/MIA Issues: Recent Developments

and Issues. Since 1991, the U.S. has gained substantial access to aircraft crash sites,

Vietnamese records, and Vietnamese civilians, and has established a substantial permanent

presence of military and civilian personnel. For several years, the Vietnamese have allowed

U.S. personnel some access to their government archives and permitted some interviews with

senior Vietnamese military leaders from the war. This increased access, however, has not

yet led to large numbers of Americans being removed en masse from the rolls of people who

are unaccounted for; between 1991 and 2005, the total number has generally dropped by 3035 cases per year. However, much information or material or information obtained in

Vietnam does not assist in remains identification; upon close study it turns out to be

redundant, already in U.S. hands, or pertaining to resolved cases. In addition, DPMO has

stated that a “Vietnamese Government disinformation program has been associated with

recent reporting on missing Americans. Those reports all pertain to the alleged recovery of

remains and identifying data (i.e., dog tags) by Vietnamese citizens.” [Cited in recent editions

of the Vietnam-Era Unaccounted For Statistical Report of the DPMO, located at the DPMO

website.]

Some involved with the POW/MIA issue argue that Vietnamese cooperation on the

POW/MIA issue has actually been spotty and uneven at best, arguing that the U.S.

government has tended to equate activity with results and resource inputs with true outputs

in terms of the fate of unaccounted-for Americans. They suggest that the true cost of all U.S.

military and diplomatic activities associated with post-Vietnam War POW/MIA-related

activities is much higher than stated DPMO budget outlays of approximately $15 million

yearly, perhaps as much as $50-100 million yearly. They allege that Vietnam and North

Korea charge extraordinarily high fees for providing support to DPMO/JPAC operations,

such as logistical support, aviation costs, food and lodging, and the like, and that the services

received are by no means as lavish as the bills presented indicate.

U.S. Policy and the Remains Issue. As noted above, DPMO believes of the 1,815

Americans listed as unaccounted for as of August 5, 2005, that 667 are definitely dead and

that further investigation could result in no more evidence or remains being found. Such

cases include those that resulted from aircraft explosions, drowning, or simple disappearance.

Some believe that the Vietnamese have documentary evidence about the fate of at least some

of them. It appears that concerns over public reaction, more than disagreements on the part

of American analysts that the individuals concerned really are dead, are holding up the

decision to close these cases. The question may be as follows: if evidence other than remains

CRS-5

IB92101

02-16-06

is not conclusive, what use is it, if no remains are available? The number of cases listed for

“No Further Pursuit” DPMO does fluctuate, based on new evidence — cases hitherto thought

unresolvable are made active by more information; those in which leads were being pursued

turn out to be apparently unresolvable.

Congress and the POW/MIA Issue, 1993-2005 (FY1994-FY2006).

2005 (FY2006) Congressional Action. No relevant matters are in the full House

and the Senate Armed Services Committee versions of the FY2006 National Defense

Authorization Act (NDAA).

On June 20, 2005, in House floor debate on the FY2006 Department of Defense (DOD)

Appropriation Act (H.R. 2863, 109th Congress; passed House June 20, 2005), a colloquy on

POW/MIA matters took place between Representative Nathan Deal and Representative C.W.

Bill Young, chairman of the House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee (see

Congressional Record, June 20, 2005: H4767). At Mr. Deal’s request, Mr. Young agreed

that a report should be prepared about allegations that the Defense POW/Missing Personnel

Office (DPMO) has recently been arbitrary, uncooperative, and hostile with POW/MIA

organizations and families, and that this report should be published in the eventual

conference report on the act. Mr. Deal was further concerned about “compliance with all

applicable provisions of law,” with particular reference to allegations about attempts to use

military air transportation for MIA families to coerce them into supporting DPMO initiatives,

and said that “this report must reflect a comprehensive study of DPMO’s guidance and policy

initiatives.” The National League of Families of American Prisoners of War and Missing in

Southeast Asia has stated these allegations in detail in its Newsletter/Review of 2004,

available online at [http://www.pow-miafamilies.org/3-22-05%20Newsletter.pdf].

2004 (FY2005) Congressional Action. The FY2005 NDAA, P.L. 108-375,

October 28, 2004; 118 Stat. 1811, included a provision (Sec. 582) which required DOD to

maintain the number of military and civilian personnel in the DPMO at 46 and 69,

respectively, and the FY2005 budget at $16.0 million, the levels of FY2003. It also required

GAO to study the adequacy of DPMO funding and personnel levels in relation to the

missions it has to perform. This provision appears to have been engendered by congressional

concern over DOD efforts to decrease the resources allocated to the DPMO, both personnel

and funding. This provision essentially incorporated the House version of the bill, with some

minor changes; the Senate version included no similar provision.

2003 (FY2004) Congressional Action. Section 588 of the FY2004 National

Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 108-136, November 24, 2003; 117 Stat. 1392) expressed

the sense of the Congress that the United States should aggressively pursue the case of MIAs,

with particular reference to Speicher, and authorized a $1 million reward to individuals who

provide information leading to the resolution of the Speicher case and others (see below, “A

Persian Gulf War POW/MIA Case”).

2002 (FY2003) Congressional Action. The FY2003 National Defense

Authorization Act (P.L. 107-314, December 2, 2002; 116 Stat. 2458), included two

provisions related to POW/MIA matters. Section 551 prohibited DOD from reducing

personnel or budget levels of the DPMO (this appears to have resulted from planned

reductions of at least 15% in the size of the DPMO staff as part of a general effort to reduce

CRS-6

IB92101

02-16-06

headquarters staffs). Section 583 required the Secretary of Defense to submit a

comprehensive report on the Speicher case (see below, “A Persian Gulf War POW/MIA

Case”) to Congress within 60 days after the bill became law.

1993-2001 (FY1994-FY2002) Congressional Action. From 1993 through 1997

(FY1994-FY1998 legislation), the annual defense authorization bill included POW/MIArelated sections with considerable policy significance and, frequently, political controversy.

However, during 1998-2001 (FY1999-FY2002 legislation), Congress arguably “took a

breather” on POW/MIA matters. None of the National Defense Authorization or Intelligence

Authorization Acts of the latter period contained significant POW/MIA-related provisions

or report language with broad policy implications.

Vietnam POW/MIAs: Were Americans Left Behind? Are Any Still Alive?

Those who believe Americans are still held, or were held after the war ended, feel that even

if no specific report has thus far been proved, the numbers unaccounted for, and the

cumulative mass of information about live Americans is compelling. Frequently, people

holding this view suggest that throughout the 1970s, in the bitter and sour aftermath of the

Vietnam War, there was a lack of will in the government, which reflected that of the country

as a whole, to continue investigating the POW/MIA issue. They posit that this contributed

to “a mindset to debunk” reports of live Americans, as well as a desire on the part of

successive Administrations to wash their hands of the issue.

Those who doubt Americans are still held, or were when the war ended, argue that

despite numerous reports, exhaustive interrogations, and formidable technical means used

by U.S. intelligence agencies, no report of an unaccounted-for live American (with the

exception of Garwood) has been validated as to who, when, and where the individual is or

was. They believe that much of the “evidence” cited relates to already accounted-for

Americans, wishful thinking, or fabrication.

Most U.S. government analysts have come to believe that it is extremely unlikely that

the North Vietnamese kept U.S. prisoners after the end of the war, or transferred any to the

USSR. They appear to appreciate the repressive nature of totalitarian communist regimes

— that the Vietnamese could have opted to keep some Americans. They just feel that their

examination of the evidence indicates that they did not. Significantly, the progressively

increasing penetration of Vietnam by a large American official presence, American business

interests, and tens of thousands of American and European tourists, has failed to disclose any

indications that American POWs were kept behind in the early 1970s, let alone are still being

held.

The “Coverup” Issue. Some say the U.S. government has engaged in a “coverup”

of evidence about live Americans still being held in Indochina; they attach greater credence

to some sources than does the government, and suggest that the criteria set by the

government for validating reports of live Americans are unreasonably, and perhaps

deliberately, high. The government responds by stating that such assertions are based on data

that is inaccurate or fraudulent. It also asserts that numerous investigations have cleared

DIA of coverup charges and that the ability to maintain a coverup strains credulity in an era

of press leaks and openness. Since 1982, it has been U.S. policy to provide intelligence to

families of unaccounted-for Americans that pertains or may pertain to their missing men.

CRS-7

IB92101

02-16-06

Have Americans Remained in Indochina Voluntarily? Some Americans

stayed in Indochina voluntarily, Garwood being the best known. Another defected to the

Viet Cong in 1967 and was killed by the Khmer Rouge (Cambodian communists) in 1975

or 1976. Ideology, collaboration with the enemy and a fear of punishment upon return to the

U.S., personal problems, a home, a local wife and children, “brainwashing” by captors, or

a combination of these factors, all could have played a role in other Americans remaining in

Indochina voluntarily. The Vietnamese have always left room for such by denying Americans

are living in areas “under their control.” In addition, the U.S. government policy cited above

on live Americans is careful to refer to “Americans ... still being held against their will.”

Are the Vietnamese, Laotians, or Cambodians Still Holding the Remains

of Dead Americans? Few question the proposition that for many years the Vietnamese

had a stockpile from which they released remains as they saw fit. The DPMO believes that

this stockpile may have been exhausted by August 1990. Whether the Vietnamese hold

other remains is not known. Some suggest the Vietnamese have not released remains that

would indicate mistreatment of POWs and/or that some were alive when the war ended but

died in Vietnamese custody thereafter (although such mistreatment is well known).

The large number of Americans lost in or over Laos, the number of known discrepancy

cases, and the few Americans returned who had been captured in Laos suggest that the

Laotians know more about the fate of unaccounted-for Americans than they have yet stated.

On the other hand, most Lao governments, communist or not, have exercised little control

over large parts of their country, due to Vietnamese occupation and their own lack of

resources. This suggests the Laotians may not have the ability to provide many answers

about missing Americans, and such answers may be better found from the Vietnamese. Laos

is, however, one area where searches of aircraft crash sites have resulted in the recent

identification of some unaccounted-for Americans. Recently, for example in March 2005,

a U.S. POW/MIA-related delegation held talks with Lao officials to discuss ways to improve

U.S. access to information and aircraft crash sites related to U.S. Vietnam War POWs.

Korean War POWs/MIAs

Since the Korean War ended in 1953, there have been rumors Americans captured by

the North Koreans or Chinese were, or still are, held against their will in North Korea, China,

or Russia/the former USSR. There is little doubt that the communist powers involved in the

war have withheld much information on POW/MIA from the United States, probably much

more by the North Koreans and Chinese than Russia.

DPMO states that although there is no first-hand, direct evidence of Korean War POWs

being transferred to the Soviet Union, the cumulative weight of circumstantial evidence is

so compelling that they believe that at least small numbers of Americans were in fact so

transferred. There are indications that some sightings of Caucasians by foreign nationals in

North Korea may be of several American soldiers who defected to North Korea in the

post-Korean War era. In addition, some U.S. POWs were not released by China until 1955,

two years after the war ended. Two civilian CIA aircrew members shot down over North

Korea during the war, in 1952, were imprisoned for 20 years and not released until 1972.

Declassified U.S. documents indicate that the U.S. government maintained an intensive

interest in live POWs from the Korean War throughout the 1950s. The end of the Korean

CRS-8

IB92101

02-16-06

War in 1953 was followed by intensely bitter relations between the U.S., the North Koreans,

and the Chinese. This suggests that the two communist enemies of the United States during

the Korean War, as well as a Stalinist Soviet Union, were inclined to hold live Americans

— perhaps more so than Vietnam in the 1970s.

During the mid-1950s, the U.S. demanded the North Koreans and Chinese account for

missing Americans. After 1955, due to the lack of response by the communists (except for

the return of 1,868 remains in 1954), the issue abated, although the United States periodically

raised the issue. In 1957, House Foreign Affairs Committee hearings on the Korean MIA

issue aired frustrations similar to those raised since 1973 on Indochina MIAs. Although the

issue of Korean MIAs began to get more attention in the early 1980s, concrete results of

contact with the North Koreans were minimal until 1996. Between mid-1996 and mid-1997,

negotiations took place in which United States and North Korea agreed on parameters for

conducting field investigations and archival research for U.S. MIAs. Between 1996 and

2004, U.S. personnel completed 36 “joint field activities” (JFAs) — searches for American

remains — in North Korea. These teams recovered 224 remains, of which 20 have been

identified as those of Americans. Agreement was reached in late 2004 for five more JFAs

to be conducted in 2005; the first took place between mid-April and mid-May 2005.

However, on May 25, 2005, DOD suspended the operations of U.S. POW/MIA

personnel operating in North Korea, citing heightened concerns about their safety in the

context of rising tensions between the United States and North Korea. “The teams operate

in North Korea under terms that effectively cut off their ability to communicate with anyone

outside the country....The only message permitted is a daily situation report sent from a

liaison officer in Pyongyang [the North Korean capital]. ... Although acceptable to U.S.

commanders in the past, this restrictive condition would clearly hamper any effort by other

U.S. forces to protect the recovery teams should an emergency arise. Such a consideration,

[a U.S. military spokesman said]played a part in the decision to suspend the missions.”1

The most recent identification of remains returned from North Korea took place on July

22, 2005, when DOD announced that the remains of a U.S. Army soldier MIA from the

Korean War had been identified. The remains had first been returned to the United States

from North Korea in 1993.

There has been some controversy about the payments the U.S. has made to North Korea

for POW/MIA-related search activity. Since 1993, DPMO has paid North Korea about $15

million for recovery operations; “as with joint recovery operations in Vietnam, Laos, and

other countries, the payments are calculated by negotiating the compensation provided for

the workers, materials, facilities, and equipment provided by” the North Koreans. Some

have alleged that the sums are a form of disguised subsidy and provide little benefit, in terms

of remains found, although it may be that the extremely austere conditions in North Korea

make any sort of operations there difficult and expensive by American standards. For further

information, see CRS Report RL31785, Foreign Assistance to North Korea, by Mark E.

Manyin.

1

Bradley Graham, “U.S. Halts Missions To Recover Remains in N. Korea,” Washington Post, May

26, 2005, p. A-19.

CRS-9

IB92101

02-16-06

POWs and MIAs from Cold War Incidents

During the Cold War (1946-1991), some U.S. military aircraft were shot down by the

USSR, Eastern European countries, China, and North Korea. Some of these aircraft were

performing intelligence missions near or actually inside Soviet airspace; others were

definitely in international airspace and/or were not involved in intelligence operations.

While virtually all such aircraft losses were acknowledged at the time, often with

considerable publicity, their intelligence functions were not.

Between 1946 and 1977, according to a DOD list released in 1992, there were at least

38 such aircraft shootdowns and one involving a ship (the seizure of the U.S.S. Pueblo, by

the North Koreans in early 1968). Of the 364 crewmembers, 187 were eventually returned

to U.S. custody, the remains of 34 were recovered, 11 were known to be dead from

eyewitness reports but remains were not recovered, and 132 were “not recovered, fate

unknown.” Throughout the late 1940s and early 1950s, intelligence (mostly apparently

obtained from German and Japanese POWs from World War II, several hundred thousands

of whom were not released by the Soviets until 1954-1955) provided considerable evidence

that some crewmembers of these aircraft had been seen and spoken to in Soviet concentration

camps. After the Cold War ended in 1989-1991, the United States began to receive

substantial Russian cooperation about Soviet involvements in Cold War shootdowns.

However, there is little doubt that the Russians have not released all available information,

due to varying levels of obstructionism by Russian officials and other Russians still

sympathetic to communism and the former Soviet Union, and the often-disorganized nature

of government in post-Soviet Russia..

A second type of “Cold War incident” involves kidnapping of U.S. personnel in or near

Soviet-occupied territory in Europe after the end of World War II, by Soviet intelligence

agents. Most, however, were defectors, or had wandered into Soviet-occupied areas for

nonpolitical reasons (romantic entanglements, drunkenness, and the like). The full story of

such kidnappings may well not have been told and may never be. There is no question that

numerous West Germans were kidnapped by Soviet and East German intelligence agencies

in the late 1940s and early and mid-1950s.2

Post-Cold War POW/MIAs

The Iraq war that began on March 19, 2003, provides the most recent illustration that

the POW/MIA issue is not merely one of historical interest. Congressional concerns over

Americans unaccounted for during the Cold War have been an integral component of the

discussion about how to account for Americans missing or captured since then. The largest

conflicts since the Cold War began to end in 1989 were the two wars with, or in, Iraq.

2

See Smith, Arthur L., Jr. Kidnap City: Cold War Berlin. Westport, CN, Greenwood Press, 2002.

CRS-10

IB92101

02-16-06

The Persian Gulf War of 1991

(Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm)

A total of 49 American military personnel were initially listed as missing in action

during the Persian Gulf War. Of these, 23 were captured by the Iraqis and released after the

war ended, the remains of 13 were recovered, and another 13 were eventually determined to

be KIA-BNR. However, the status of one of the latter 13 was changed back to MIA in

January 2001, based on evidence that he may have survived and been captured, as discussed

below.

The Speicher Case. On January 10, 2001, the Navy changed the status of Lt. Cdr.

Michael Scott Speicher from KIA to MIA. Speicher was the first U.S. pilot shot down

during the Persian Gulf War, on the night of January 17, 1991. His body was never

recovered. There is no doubt his aircraft was shot down and crashed in Iraq about 150 miles

southwest of Baghdad. Issues include the lack of remains, resultant questions about whether

he was in fact killed upon impact, and some evidence, from a variety of sources, that he was

taken prisoner by the Iraqis when in relatively good physical condition. A joint DOD/CIA

report prepared at the request of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, and first

publicized in 2001, stated that “We assess that Iraq can account for LCDR Speicher but that

Baghdad is concealing information about his fate. LCDR Speicher probably survived the

loss of his aircraft, and if he survived, he almost certainly was captured by the Iraqis” (CRS

italics). Significantly, the occupation of Iraq by U.S. and other coalition forces since March

2003, and extensive investigation of possible leads about Speicher, has not, so far, led to

more substantive information about his fate, although some leads could not be pursued due

to the security threat posed by the Iraqi insurgency.3 In early September 2005 another Navy

report on Speicher’s status was completed. It reiterated conclusions reached in earlier studies

that he could well have been captured; that there was no specific evidence of his death; and

that some former members — they were not identified, if known — of the Saddam Hussein

government of Iraq were knowledgeable about his fate. Accordingly, it recommended that

Speicher’s status be maintained as missing, rather than killed, and U.S military and civilian

agencies in Iraq, and the new Iraqi government, “increase the level of attention and effort

inside Iraq” devoted to the case.4

The Ongoing Iraq War, 2003-Present: POW/MIA Matters

On April 13, 2003, the seven remaining American POWs known to have been captured

by the Iraqis since the war began on March 19, 2003, were recovered by U.S. troops. An

eighth had already been rescued by U.S. special operations forces on April 1 (this was the

widely reported case of Army PFC Jessica Lynch). A maximum of 21 U.S. military

3

See, for example, Scarborough, Rowan. “U.S. team concludes Navy pilot died in Gulf war,”

Washington Times, July 22, 2004: A3; and “No Clues to Fate of Missing Pilot,” AP Story from

[http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,FL_pilot_100704.00html?ESRC=eb.nl] on October

8, 2004. This is an unofficial, commercial military news website oriented toward concerns of

military personnel.

4

Burns, Robert. “Navy: Members of old Iraqi regime know pilot’s whereabouts.” Associated Press

story retrieved online, September 9, 2005.

CRS-11

IB92101

02-16-06

personnel were listed as POW or MIA during the initial stages of the war. On April 28,

2003, DOD announced that the remains of the last remaining American listed as MIA at that

time had been positively identified.

On April 9, 2004, one American soldier was captured by Iraqi insurgents. He was the

first POW taken by the enemy in Iraq since the eight captured in the early part of the war

were liberated by U.S. forces in April 2003. Although there were rumors in late June that

he had been killed, these reports were not confirmed and have since died down; U.S. officials

say they have no reason to think he is not still a POW, and he is listed as such.

It is not clear whether or not a U.S. Marine of Lebanese extraction — who was first

declared missing from his unit in Iraq in June 2004, returned to U.S. custody a month later,

and then gone absent without leave (AWOL) in January 2005 — was ever a POW: that is,

held against his will.

World War II POWs and MIAs: Soviet Imprisonment of

U.S. POWs Liberated from the Germans

There are allegations that the USSR failed to repatriate up to 25,000 American POWs

liberated from the Germans after World War II ended in Europe on May 8, 1945. This

appears to have no foundation in fact and results in large part from an apparent lack of rigor

and care in analyzing the issue. Archival research in the United States and Russia, combined

with interviews in Russia, appears to establish conclusively that virtually all such prisoners

were returned. In addition, the large flow of information on Soviet concentration camps of

the Stalin era, beginning in the early 1960s, both in writing and from emigre accounts, has

provided no indication of mass imprisonment of Americans.

Some U.S. citizens of German birth who served in the German armed forces or lived

in Germany were taken prisoner by the Red Army as it advanced into Central Europe; in

addition, the Soviet secret police singled out Americans with German, Russian, or Jewish

names for special attention. Both figures are consonant with other knowledge of the arbitrary

and brutal nature of the Stalinist USSR. Accounts of U.S. dealings with the USSR during

and immediately after World War II on the POW issue are replete with accounts of Soviet

obfuscation, truculence, and reluctant cooperation. The Joint U.S.-Russian Commission on

POWs/MIAs investigating these issues has obtained a good deal of information. However,

as was noted above in the section on Cold War shootdowns and similar incidents, there has

been considerable hesitancy and obstruction of the Commission’s work by officials still

sympathetic to communism and the former Soviet regime.

CRS-12

IB92101

02-16-06

FOR ADDITIONAL READING

Defense POW/Missing Personnel Office. Extensive statistical breakdowns, lists of

individuals, and studies and analyses on POW/MIA matters from World War II to the

present. [http://www.dtic.mil/dpmo]

Nenninger, Timothy K. “United States Prisoners of War and the Red Army, 1944-45: Myths

and Realities.” The Journal of Military History, July 2002: 761-82.

Sledge, Michael. Soldier Dead: How We Recover, Identify, Bury, and Honor Our Military

Fallen. New York, Columbia University Press, 2005. 376 p.

Swift, Earl. Where They Lay: Searching for America’s Lost Soldiers. Boston, Houghton

Mifflin Co., 2003. 307 p.

U.S. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs. POW/MIA’s. Report.

January 13, 1993. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1993 (103rd Congress, 1st

session. S.Rept. 103-1). 1223 p.

CRS Products

CRS Issue Brief IB98033, The Vietnam-U.S. Normalization Process, by Mark E. Manyin.

CRS-13

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.