Petition for Writ of Certiorari — United States ex rel. Karpathiou v. Jordan
Supreme Court brief1946
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
IN THE
Supreme Court of the United States
Ocroner Term, A. D. 1945.
No. 4201
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Ex REL. CONSTANTINOS KARPATHIOU,
Petitioner,
vs.
ANDREW JORDAN, Disrrict Dmecror or Inicration
anp Naturauization, Cutcaco District,
Respondent.
PETITION FCR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO REVIEW
DECISION OF THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
Harry G. Jonnson,
Attorney for Petitioner.
THE GUNTHORP. WARREN PRINTING COMPANY, 210 WEST JACKSON, CHICAGO
NE IK: Geek oy 8 Me PURVES ETE MY QUST AORN g
Spt SEA RE RS REE PO SBI REE AA hah ae
PAGE
Petition for Writ of Certiorari..................... 1
ID MU PUNE wk a Sk Seb Ca cn ns cc cacouhaeees 2
Se MN aan dos iis oageudtenne sakeemctince 6
SS. CIS ns aa 6c eek S A eileen dh chen ees 21
PCR MN ai sai ak cnbheee ce ba vawioeba 22
Brief in Support of Petition for Writ of
SN B.'s bX Gi RR REM OEM Ree Faas cabs 23
Statement of Jurindiction. ...........0ccccceeeseces 24
EE uhh Bub Kenivb ds dendk beunh Ka han ia bem en cols 43
. Summary of Immigration Inspector............ 43
Finding of Assistant to Secretary of Labor...... 43
First Opinion of Court of Appeals.............. 43
Second Opinion of Court of Appeals............ 47
Summary or ARGUMENT.
A. The decision rendered herein is in conflict with
the decisions of several other Circuit Courts of Appeal
on the same matter.
B. The decision of the United States Circuit Court
of Appeals departs from the accepted and usual
course of judicial proceedings of like matter.
C. The decision of the United States Cireuit Court
ef Appeals is in conflict with applicable decisions of
this court.
D. The decision of the United States Cireuit Court
of Appeals has sanctioned such a departure by the
Department of Labor in like matter, as to call for
an exercise of the Supreme Court’s power of super-
vision.
ae?
ak
mS oL PA ASEM Sm TEEN TU TA
ee
ll
KE. The Petitioner, by the ruling of the Depart-
ment of Labor, has been deprived of his liberty with-
out due process of law and in violation of the Fifth
Amendment of the Constitution of the United States
of America.
F. No order for Deportation has been made by the
Secretary of Labor.
Cases Crrep.
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. U. S., 264 U. S.
DASA CESK GSAS WENKS WEA b44R kha bo ewkk Sakis 23, 26, 31
Curier Post Publishing Co. v. Federal Commission.. 30
Department of Finance v. Goldberg, 370 Ill. 578...... 23
Hanges v. Whitfield, 209 Fed. 675.............. 23, 27, 32
In re Japanese Immigrant Case, 189 U. S. 86... .23, 27, 37
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville &
National Railway, 227 U. S. 88.................. 23, 26
Low Wah Suey v. Backus, 225 U. S. 460........... 25, 31
Morgan v. U. S., 298 U. S. 478................ 23, 25, 31
Union Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Slee, 123
Me Naso ah CA aa Ek oe kkc ok camo haw cadtens 37
United States v. Brough, 15 F. (2d) 377............ 46
U.S. v. Abilene & 8S. Railway Co., 265 U. S. 274. .23, 25, 31
Statutes Crrep.
United States Code, See. 155, Title 8.............. 24, 44
Oe a ae ae wae
IN THE
Supreme Court of the United States
Octoser Term, A. D. 1945.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
EX REL. CONSTANTINOS KARPATHIOU,
Petitioner,
vs.
ANDREW JORDAN, District Drrecror or ImmicRATION
AND NaTuraLizaTIon, Cuicaco District,
Respondent.
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO REVIEW
DECISION OF THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
To the Honorable Judges of the
Supreme Court of the United States:
Petitioner, Constantinos KarpaTHiou, prays the issuance
of a Writ of Certiorari to review the decision by the
United States Cireuit Court of Appeals of the Seventh
District, rendered February 18, 1946, in case 8851, in that
the court affirmed the judgment of the District Court of the
United States. The United States District Court dismissed
the Petition of your Petitioner for a Writ of Habeas
Corpus.
ConsTantTINos KarpaTHIOU,
By Harry G. Jounson,
His Attorney.
3 Be,
STATEMENT OF FACTS.
This action came before the District Court upon a Peti-
tion for a Writ of Habeas Corpus on behalf of Constantinos
Karpathious, Petitioner herein, against Andrew Jordan,
District Director of Immigration at Chicago, Illinois. The
Petition alleged that the Petitioner was restrained and
imprisoned by the said Andrew Jordan by virtue of a cer-
tain pretended warrant of arrest issued on the 14th day of
January, 1934; further alleged that after his arrest, a
hearing was had before the Immigration Inspector at Mil-
waukee, Wisconsin and that after said hearing the Peti-
tioner was informed that on the 7th day of July, 1938, a
warrant for his deportation had been issued by the Secre-
tary of Labor at Washington, D. C.
The Petition further alleged that the said warrant of
deportation is void and issued without authority of law
for the following reasons:
1. That your Petitioner is lawfully entitled to re-
main in the United States.
2. That said warrant of deportation was not sus-
tained by any evidence at the hearing afforded your
Petitioner by the Inspector in charge of Immigration
and Naturalization at Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
3. That your Petitioner was not afforded a full and
fair hearing by the Department of Labor or by the
Inspector in charge of said hearing.
4. That no legal evidence was heard by the Inspec-
tor or by the Department of Labor upon which the
deportation warrant could legally be predicated.
5. That your Petitioner was not found as a matter
of fact managing a house of prostitution or music or.
dance hall or other place of amusement and that no
evidence supporting said charge was adduced before
the Inspector or Department of Labor in said hearing.
6. That your Petitioner was denied the right to
cross-examine witnesses which right is guaranteed him
by the Constitution of the United States.
\ 7. That said Andrew Jordan, District Director of
Immigration at Chicago, Illinois, or any other officer
having custody of Petitioner has no warrant whatso-
ever for the commitment or detention of Petitioner.
That upon the filing of said Petition and notice to the
District Attorney, an order was entered granting leave to
respondent to file a reply or motion to dismiss said Petition
within five days and said motion was set for hearing June
Ist, 1945.
That thereafter on the 29th day of May, 1945, the re-
spondent Tiled 4n the Clerks office his Motion to dismiss
the Petition. Said Motion set forth: ‘‘The Petitioner was
arrested on October 28, 1936 by Immigrant Inspector
Lawrence Giesking on warrant of arrest issued by the
Secretary of Labor, dated October 27, 1936. He was ac-
corded hearings pursuant to said warrant of arrest on
October 27, October 29 and November 6, 1936 and on No-
|vember 18, 1937. At each of these hearings he was rep-
resented by counsel. The Secretary of Labor having con-
sidered the evidence directed the Petitioner’s deportation
ito Greece on the charge that the Petitioner is subject to
deportation under Section 19 of the Immigration Act of
February 5, 1917 in that he is employed by, in, or in con-
nection with a house of prostitution; and that he is an
inmate of a house of prostitution. The Petitioner was
released under bond of One Thousand Dollats ($1000.00)
| pending deportation. When he was surrendered by the
| surety for deportation on July 16, 1938, he filed a Petition
for Writ of Habeas Corpus which was issued by this Court
on July 16, 1938 under Habeas Corpus Cause No. 47.
After due hearing upon the Petition, Honorable Charles
IIPS LET AL
4
E. Woodward, Judge of this Court, dismissed the Writ
of Habeas Corpus and remanded the Petitioner to the
-eustody of the District Director of Immigration and Nat-
uralization at Chicago, Illinois. The Petitioner appealed
to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit and on
October 20, 1939 that Court affirmed the order of the United
States District Court. This case is reported in 106 F. 2d
928. The Petitioner then appealed to the United States
Supreme Court and certiorari was denied. (60 Sct. 721,
309 U. S. 681, 84 L. Ed. 1024.) The record which was
certified to the Circuit Court of Appeals may be found in
Habeas Corpus Cause No. 47 which is a part of the official
records of this Court. A copy of the decision of the Circuit
Court of Appeals is attached hereto, made a part hereof
and marked Exhibit One (1).
The Court is further informed that the Petition for
Writ of Habeas Corpus now before this Court is identical
with the original Petition which was dismissed by this
Court and which order of dismissal was affirmed by the
Cireuit Court of Appeals and certiorari was denied by the
United States Supreme Court. No new issues of any kind
are raised by the new Petition.
Wherefore your respondent respectfully moves the Court
to dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed
herein.’’
A hearing on said Petition and Motion was had on June
1st, 1945, and an order entered dismissing said Petition.
Notice of Appeal to the United States Cireuit Court of
Appeals, Points of errors relied upon for reversal, Prae-
cipe for Transcript of record and several stipulations were
duly filed and appear in the Record. The Abstract of the
testimony also appears in the Transcript of the Record
filed herein.
5
Exhibit Two was a record of hearings accorded the Peti-
tioner on October 29, November 6, and August 18, 1937.
Exhibit Three is a copy of the warrant of deportation dated
January 14, 1938 and signed by Turner W. Battle, an
Assistant to the Secretary of Labor, directing Petitioner’s
deportation.
Thereafter, Petition for appeal to the United States Cir-
cuit Court of Appeals was filed granting said appeal and
ordering said Petitioner admitted to bail pending the final
determination of his appeal; and thereafter the Relator
filed his assignment of errors in the said District Court
and an order was entered upon Stipulation of Counsel, that
the original file, papers and records may be considered
by the United States Circuit Court of Appeals in lieu of a
certified copy of same. A praecipe for transcript of record
was duly filed. Notice of appeal was served upon the
United States District Attorney.
THE EVIDENCE.
In order to properly present the issues in this case to
this court, it will be necessary for us to quote quite ex-
tensively from the evidence.
ConsTANTINOS KARPATHIOU:
Also known as Gus Pururres.
I was born September 15, 1888, in Vathy, Greece. I now
live at Route #3, Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. My oceupa-
tion is that of a cook. I am employed by May Phillips in
the Willow Inn at Beaver Dam. I live at the same place
where I am employed. I have been employed there about
three years at $35.00 a month, board and room. I am not
married. (Married to an American born woman on Feb- |
ruary 21, 1938, at Dubuque, Iowa.) I entered the United |
States September 23, 1907, New York, as a 3rd class pas- |
senger. Examined by United States Immigrant Inspector |
Paid my head tax. I applied for my first papers on
February 4, 1935 at Fond du Lac, Wisconsin. (Papers |
granted.) I have never committed a crime or misdemeanor. |
The only time I was arrested was for reckless driving, for |
which I paid a fine of $5.00 and cost. I have never veen
the inmate of a house of prostitution or managed such or
assisted in the management of such, nor been employed in
or connected with such a place. I have never managed a
dance or music hall, or any place frequented by prostitutes,
or derived any benefits therefrom or shared in the earnings
of a prostitute. Nor have I assisted, protected, promised
protection, transport, or solicit men for prostitutes. I am
acquainted with Kanelos Paskos. I have known him for
about four years. I met him when I was working in a
>
7
restaurant at Fond du Lac. Everything he said about me
in his statement is a lie. I have never known Pat Murphey
or Hazel Vebeldt. I came to this country when I was a
kid, and I have been here for thirty years and have not
violated any laws and I tried to become an American
citizen. I have spent all of my life in this country. I am
48 years of age. Whatever those people said about me is
not true. What Paskos said about me is not true. He
has a grudge against me. I do not see why I should be
deported. I did not violate any law.
Water BuscHuKkorpr:
I am Sheriff of Dodge County, and live at Juneau, Wis-
consin. I have never had any reports, and my investiga-
tors never found any conditions at Willow Inn which would
indicate that it was being run, or conducted as a house of
il] fame.
WituiaM Hav:
I live at Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. I am eashier of the
Farmers’ State Bank. I have been in the banking business
for 25 years and know the property known as Willow Inn.
During the sale of this property to May Phillips, I have
had occasion to go to the Willow Inn. On those oceasions
I did not notice anything that would in any manner indi-
cate that the place was being conducted as a disorderly
house or a house of ill fame. The place had not had a
reputation of being referred to as a disorderly house. To
my knowledge, it is not known as a house of prostitution.
I know the alien, Gus Phillips. His reputation in Beaver
Dam is very good. I know Kanelos Paskos. His reputa-
tion in Deaver Dam is very poor, and his reputation for
truthfulness is none too good. I would not believe him
under oath. I have seen Gus Phillips once or twice a
month. I go to the Willow Inn practically every month,
sometimes twice a month.
Henry Krvuecer:
I live at Beaver Dam. My occupation is that of a farmer
and Assemblyman. I have lived in Beaver Dam practically
my entire life. I have been an Assemblyman for the past
four years and have been re-elected. I have been Town
Chairman for the Town of Beaver Dam for a number of
years. As such Chairman, one of my duties is to issue
tavern licenses. I know where the Willow Inn is. I have
never had any complaint of any nature against that tavern.
The application for license was made by May Phillips and
granted to her. I have known Gus Phillips for about three
years. I have never heard anything derogatory to his
reputation and have never heard anything bad about him.
I know Kanelos Paskos. He made an application for a
license in the name of some other name and the license was
not granted, and he made several threats against me at
that time. I know he has been arrested several times.
While I was Chairman, no complaints were made to me
about the Willow Inn, or May Phillips. The Town Board
has a committee to make investigations. While I was in
the Willow Inn I never observed anything that would indi-
cate to me that the place was being run as a house of ill
fame.
EMMERSON WALDHIER:
Tiive at Beaver Dam. My occupation is that of a jeweler
for the past 17 years. I know the premises known as
Willow Inn, and May Phillips. I have business dealings
with her. I also know Gus Phillips and Kanelos Paskos.
I have known Phillips for about three years. As far as I
know you can’t find a cleaner cut man than Gus Phillips.
In fact, I never heard anything bad about him. I have
S
h
f
V
I
i
1
,
]
t
’
stopped by the Willow Inn several times. I have never
heard that the place was being conducted as a house of ill
fare, and when there I did not notice anything out of the
way. I know that Kanelos Paskos has not got a good
reputation. ‘he first I knew of him was when he killed
a man and served time for it. I would absolutely not
believe him under oath. I would say that Phillips is a very
much respectful sort of a fellow and could be trusted. May
Phillips owns and manages the Willow Inn. I have been
there several times and when there I never noticed any
women hanging around there.
Harry Ben HENDLER:
I live at Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. I am managing a fruit
Market. I know the premises known as Willow Inn and
Gus Phillips, as well as May Phillips. I have known them
for about 2) years. I know that May Phillips is the owner
of those premises. I have been there quite often. I have
never heard that the reputation of Willow Inn was that of
a house of ill fame, and it has always borne a good reputa-
tion. When I was there nothing ever happened that would
indicate that it was being conducted as a house of ill fame.
I have never been solicited by anyone there. It has always
been operated as a good clean tavern. I know Kanelos
Paskos. I know that his reputation is the opposite of being
a law abiding citizen. His reputation is bad. I would not
believe him under oath. Such is his general reputation in
Beaver Dam.
Arruur J. Cisco:
I run a market at Beaver Dam. I know Gus Phillips for
about three years. I also know May Phillips. I have been
at Willow Inn several times. When there I did not notice
anything about the place being operated as a house of ill
PN EE AO.
a TEATS
10
fame. No woman ever solicited me there. I never knew
anything bad about Gus Phillips, and the Willow Inn has a
good reputation.
Gus ANTONOPOULOS:
I run a shoe shining parlor and hat cleaning shop at
Beaver Dam. I know Constantinos Karpathiou for the
past three years. I have been to the Willow Im with my
family several times. I never noticed anything about the
place that would indicate to me that it was being run as a
house of ill fame. The place, since run by May Phillips,
always had a reputation of being a good clean place, and
Gus has a reputation of being a very nice fellow. I never
heard anything bad about him. I know Paskos since he
was a kid in the old country. I know he was arrested in
Greece. Llis reputation in Beaver Dam is very bad. I
would not believe him under oath. Miss Phillips manages
the Willow Inn. I have never seen Gus Phillips manage it.
The only thing I saw him do there was working in the yard.
I never noticed any women hanging around or loitering
around the place.
Tom Euan:
I am tavern keeper at Beaver Dam. I have lived there
for 26 years. | know what is going around the country.
I never heard anything bad about the Willow Inn, or May
Phillips. Ever since I have known Gus Phillips, everyone
seems to think he is a good fellow. IT have stopped by the
Willow Inn very often. No one there solicited me. It is
run as an ordinary tavern. I know Kanelos Paskos for
25 or 26 years. I know he has been arrested several times.
I do not think his reputation is very good. I have often
heard that the Willow Inn is the cleanest place in the
country.
1l
Gust THomas:
I am working at a tavern. I have known Constantinos
Karpathiou since 1932. I met him while working in a
restaurant at Fond du Lac. I know the place known as
Willow Inn. In fact, I used to have the place myself. [
sold the place to May Phillips in 1933. While I had the
place I never ran it as a house of ill fame. I have been
back there quite a few times. I have never heard anything
wrong about the place. I have never been arrested. All T
ever saw Gus Phillips do there was to clean up and working
around the place.
Mike VourGanas:
Tama tavern keeper. 1 have lived in Fond du Lae for
the past twenty years. I know Gus Phillips. He has a
good reputation,
Mike Faaas:
T work on the W. P. A. It is not true that I got my wife
io go to work at the Willow Inn to practice prostitution.
She don’t know what she is talking about. She can’t read
and understand nothing and is very nervous. She told me
she was working there for $6.00 a week. We have been
married for 3 years. She is very sick. I had the doctor
only last night. She is expecting a baby. She does not
know what she is talking about at all. The doctor told me
she did not know the difference between wrong and right.
Daniev M. Frervac:
IT am a soda water manufacturer and wholesale dealer.
I live at Beaver Dam. I have been to the Willow Inn very
often. During the time T was out there, T never noticed
anything in connection with the operation of the place that
would indicate that it was being run as a house of ill fame.
12
I never heard anything derogatory about Gus Phillips. I
never thought Gus Phillips was managing the Willow Inn.
His only work is sweeping or cleaning up the place. The
only women I saw there were always escorted.
Sreve Cones:
I work in a tavern in Fond du Lae. I am married and
have nine children. I know Gus Phillips since 1931. I
have been to the Willow Inn quite often. Whenever I went
there no women ever solicited me. I never saw any women
hanging around there. I know that May Phillips manages
the place. I have known her since 1933. I know that Gus
Phillips is only working at the Willow Inn.
Joun J. O’Mara:
I am Deputy Clerk of the Courts for Dodge County, Wis-
consin. As such Clerk I have charge of the Records of the
Cireuit Court of Dodge County. In reference to criminal
eases, I have checked the record of Kanelos Paskos. I find
a conviction against him on February 16, 1914 of being
guilty of 3rd degree murder, sentenced to 4 years in
Waupun. Another conviction on February 8, 1936, charged
with the violation of the State Liquor Laws ‘and charged
with a fine of $100. These convictions were never reversed.
May PHutiies:
My occupation is that of a tavern keeper in Beaver Dam.
I have never been arrested. I have known Gus Phillips for
4 or 5 years. He is working for me now. I am the owner
and manager of the business. I am paying him $35.00 per
month. I know Kanelos Paskos. I have not been on
friendly terms with him since I let him go for taking money
out of my cash register and he told me then he was going
to get even with me and said he was going to send Gus
back to the old country and put me out of the business.
13
That was about two years ago. He lives just across the
street. I never had any paper made out so it would look
as if I was married to Gus. It is not true that the girls
working for me were practicing prostitution. The place is
run as a straight tavern. I am positive that there is no
prostitution carried on. I never had any girls brought
there for the purpose of practicing prostitution. My trade
is a nice clean class of trade of traveling people. The girls
absolutely never give me any money. I have never been
called on the carpet by either the local, county, or state
authorities in connection with the conduct of my business.
Gust PHI.urps:
Kanelos Paskos’ statement that I am proprietor of the
Willow Inn is not correct. I never did own the Willow
Inn and have no interest therein. I have worked there
about three years. While I was working there I have never
observed anything that would indicate that prostitution
is being carried on. I have never received any money
which was derived from the business of prostitution. It is
not true that the girls did pay me $1.00. I never received
any such money. My salary is $35,00 a month with board
and room. On the 27th of last month only one girl was
working there. She was cooking and cleaning. It is not
true that I was arrested in Akron at the time and jumped
a $1,000 bond, or shot a cop. It is not true that I was
in Fond du Lac in 1931 and had a beer flat and two girls
hustling for me. I never did have a beer flat. While I
have been at the Willow Inn, there never has been any
prostitution carried on. While I have been there, there
has been periodical inspection by the Sheriff’s Office and
Town Office, but there has never been any trouble.
te Ge
14
KANELOsS PasKos:
I was arrested in Rockford for carrying a gun, and ar- |
rested last year in Beaver Dam for selling beer without a
license. I was also arrested and fined $25.00 in cost for
driving a car without a license. I went to the Court House
about a year ago to find out whether or not Gus Phillips |
was the owner of the building. I also asked the Registrar
of Deeds to look up whether or not Gus Phillips was a
citizen.
E. EK. ScouMACHER:
I am an attorney and acquainted with Gus Phillips. I
have been District Attorney for the past two years. Dur-
ing that time I have never had any complaint against the
Willow Inn. We have had under cover men working around
the Western part of Dodge County, checking up taverns
and road houses, and have had at least four places pad
locked. There was nothing to indicate that the Willow Inn
was conducted as a house of prostitution. I have never
heard by reputation or otherwise, that the Willow Inn was
run as a house of prostitution. As far as I know it has
a good reputation and is frequented by a nice class of
people. There never has been a complaint either against
the place or against May Phillips or Gus Phillips.
Mike NEUMAN:
I frequently stopped at the Willow Inn. I know a man
by the name of Gus there, who appeared to be the pro-
prietor and bartender, as far as I know. I have been there
about three times in the last year. The last time about
six months ago. There was a girl there, but I do not™...
know whether it was his wife or whose wife. There are
usually one or two girls there. I never talked to them. I
never heard that the girls were prostitutes. I have known
\
|
15
the place for a long time for one thing, but all I ever knew
about it was that it was like the other places in the country.
You could get drinks there. I do not know May Phillips.
/I never had anything to do with any of the girls there
except to buy a drink. I was never solicited by any of the
girls.
- GeorGE GROLING:
I have been Chief of Police in Beaver Dam since 1915.
I know the road side inn by the name of Willow Inn. I
suspected that he was married to Mrs. Phillips. I never
heard that the place had any girls there. I never heard
any reports about the place. The letter you showed me
addressed to the Department contains only hearsay. I
never knew that there was a girl there. I stopped there for
a glass of beer and there were no girls there at that time.
I know that the Sheriff, during the last three years has
been cleaning up these road houses. I know that in Oc-
tober these investigators were through the entire county.
The only reason I say that May Phillips is the wife of
Gus Phillips, is she told me her name was Mrs. Phillips.
LAWRENCE GIESKING:
I am United States’ Immigration Inspector at Milwaukee,
Wisconsin. I have been assigned to investigate violations
of the Immigration Laws in around Milwaukee the last
two or three years. The statement you show me is a true
statement of what Marie Theresa Gastro Martin made te
me on November 17, 1936. She has since been deported to
Mexico.
Ciara Facas:
I do not remember the Inspector Giesking. After they
left I fainted and did not hear my baby for one month.
At the time the Inspectors were there, I was sick, being
16
‘pregnant. I was nervous and excited. Some Greek fel-
low came there and told me to answer all those questions.
He said if I did not tell the truth they would put me in
jail. I did not tell the truth because I did not do that kind
of business. I was not that kind of a girl. I was a decent
girl. I told them I was a decent kind of a girl and work-
ing there. That was the truth. I never told him I went
to bed with men for money. He did ask me about other
girls there and I told him that the time I was working
there, there was no other girls there. While I was work-
ing there, I never went to a doctor for examination. I do
not know what a prostitute is, or what it means for girls
to do tricks. I do not know Pat Murphey. I never heard
of her. I do not know Johnny Sartino. I got married
about three weeks after I left there. If I answered that
Gus Phillips was the manager of Willow Inn, that was not
right. The reason I said this was at the time I did not
know what to say, yes er no. I fainted at the time. That
other guy that was there deceived me with all that stuff.
The only work I did there was cleaning work. I was paid
$6.00 a week. I did not know what I was saving when I
said they only paid me what I would make out of it. My
answer that I was making $30.00 a week as a prostitute
there, is not correct. I did not know what I was saying
when they asked me that the house got $1.00 out of the
$3.00, and I got the other $2.00. That answer was not cor-
rect. I do not remember making the answer that I gave
Gus Phillips $1.00. It was not the truth that I saw Pat
Murphey was there. I mean the answers were not true.
I am telling the truth today. No one told me to come up
here and refute the statement that I made in October. I
was married four years ago, and have been living with my
husband ever since in Fond du Lac.
i
|
|
17
LAWRENCE GIESKING:
Mrs. Fagas was not ill at the time she made the state-
ments, except that she was pregnant. She did not com-
plain about being ill. When we left she went with us to
the door and stood talking with us on the porch. Her
speech at all times was rational. It is true that Kanelos
Paskos went to her ahead of us.
Lawrence McCuure:
The last time I was in the Willow Inn was five or six
years ago. At that time the place was being run by Gus.
I do not know his last name. The alien there is the man.
There were a couple of girls there at that time. I do not
know if May Phillips was there. I suppose they took guys
upstairs. At the time I had a conversation with one of
the girls who did solicit me for prostitution. She said the
price would be $3.00. I have heard that the place had
girls there for prostitution. Only once during the times I
was there did any of the girls talk about prostitution. I
know of nobody else who was asked by any of the girls there
to go to bed for money. I know it was five or six years
ago. I do not remember who I heard it from that they
had girls there. They are supposed to have girls there.
Orro BECKER:
| T have been in the Willow Inn a couple of times just to
have a drink. A man by the name of Gus runs the place.
I am not acquainted with him. He was in the place there
a few minutes and went away. As far as I can make out,
the place is a tavern. They did not have any girls there
the time I was there. There was only one lady in back
of the bar and she served drinks. I only stayed a few
minutes. I heard that they had girls there for prostitution,
but I do not know what the girls were doing. The only
18
girls I saw was the lady behind the bar. I heard some
fellow ask the lady behind the bar where is Blondie, and
she said upstairs. I did not know who Blondie was. They
never had any girls there when I was there.
Anna Kumpsa:
I have been Cashier of Wisconsin Power and Light since
September, 1932. I have charge of and am responsible for
applications for service of the company. I received an
application from Willow Inn. Service is in the name of
May Phillips since October 14, 1935. Before that time, in
the name of May Knieley. I know that she is one and the
same person as Mrs. Phillips.
JoHN SaRTINO:
Pat Murphey came to my restaurant and asked me to
take her to Beloit. She did not tell me what she was
going to do in Beloit. I left her there with Gus Phillips.
About six months afterwards, I received a letter from her
saying that she was working at the Willow Inn. After
many months I went up there and she was working in the
Willow Inn. Gus Phillips was behind the bar. I was
there about a half an hour. I made two or three trips
and saw Pat Murphey there each time. Pat Murphey never
told me she was practicing prostitution at the Willow Inn.
I saw other girls around the place. They were drinking at
the bar and playing a slot machine. None of the girls
solicited me. Pat told me she was making good money as
a waitress. I presume she was working as a prostitute on
her past reputation. I never saw any prostitution carried
on at the Willow Inn. I never was solicited there, and IT _
do not know if Pat Murphey carried on the practice of
prostitution there. That is only my guess.
19
Nick ANGELOS:
None of the girls at the Willow Inn ever went upstairs
with me. Gus never told me if anyone came to my tavern
and looking for girls to send them out there.
Water BuscuKopr:
I have been Sheriff of Dodge County since January 7,
1935. Before that I was traffic officer for four years. While
such traffic officer I did visit the Willow Inn. I thought
Gus Phillips was the proprietor. I never had any reports
about the place being a house of prostitution. I have
had many reports about other such places and they have
all been closed.
May Puuuirs:
I have never posed at the Willow Inn as man and wife.
Gus and I have never lived there as man and wife. I
have never been arrested. I know the property known as
Willow Inn. It is listed under the name May Phillips and
T have the license to that place. The license shows single.
Henry Krvecer:
I ama member of the State Legislature and Chairman of
the Town of Beaver Dam. May Phillips made the ap-
plication for the license. Before the license was issued
to her we did investigate her character. As far as I know,
Gus Phillips had no interest in that tavern. All he did
there was to clean up and manage the house, I suppose. I
have been there at least 15 times in the last five years.
T saw one other girl there besides Mrs. Phillips, onee or
twice when T was there. No girls ever solicited me there.
I never heard of girls soliciting men there. I never heard
that the place was being operated as a house of prosti-
tution.
20
Haroip Strorryer:
I have been at the Willow Inn and saw girls there. Some
of the girls there did ask me to go upstairs to bed with
them. The price was not discussed. I took it for granted
they wanted me to go to bed with them. They also so-
licited my friend with me. We both were of the opinion it
was for prostitution. Only through hearsay did I hear that
the place was a place of prostitution. I cannot prove that,
although I believe it to be true. Nothing was said to me
at this tavern by the girls about any money. Gus Phillips
was not there at the time I said the girls solicited me.
Byron Goopau:
I am Immigration Inspector at Chicago, Illinois. I in-
vestigated several places around Beaver Dam in 1936, in-
eluding the Willow Inn. I was stopped at some of these
places and solicited, but I never was personally solicited
at the Willow Inn. Gus Phillips was not there when I
was at the Willow Inn. On the 17th day of August, I met
May Phillips there and asked her if she had any girls, and
she said she had two girls, one of them housekeeper and
the other bar maid. I have been told that the Willow Inn
was a place operated as a house of prostitution. I inquired
of several persons in and around Beaver Dam and they
all told me that the Willow Inn was a house of prosti-
tution.
— >
21
THE CONTESTED ISSUES.
1.
_ It is contended by the Petitioner that the Court erred
‘in ordering that the Writ be made absolute and remanded
‘the Petitioner to the custody of the District Director of
Immigration and Naturalization.
9
~e
_ That the Court erred in not releasing the Petitioner on
said Writ of Habeas Corpus,
|
3.
That the Court erred in finding that the said order of
deportation is supported by legal and competent evidence.
4,
That the Court erred in not holding that the warrant
of deportation was void and of no effect.
5.
That the Court erred in not holding that the Petitioner
had been deprived of his liberty without due process of
law and in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the Con-
stitution of the United States of America.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF.
Wherefore, your Petitioner prays the allowance of a
writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of |
Appeals for the Seventh Circuit to the end that this cause —
may be reviewed and decided by this Court and the judg-
ment and order entered herein be reversed and for such
relief as this court may seem meet.
Harry G. Jounsoxn,
Attorney for Petitioner.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.