Brief for Respondent — Trbovich v. Mine Workers
Supreme Court brief1972
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
prot . my |
cl , U.S. |
NoT1-l19
Gn the Supreme Gourt of the- Wnited States
ae Ocroser Tero, 1971 |
MIKE TRBOVICH, a
v. -_
UnitEp MINE Workers, FT At.
“h
7
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
“ APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
ie]
BRIEF FOR THE SECRETARY OF LABOR
4
ERWIN N. GRISWOLD, ,
, Solicitor General,
L. PATRICK GRAY III,
Assistant Attorney General,
_ HARRY R. SACHSE,
Assistant to the Solicitor General,
WALTER H. FLEISCHER, , -
‘RAYMOND D. BATTOCCHI, ~ .
. | ppp | A
Department of Jus
| Washington, D.C. 20530.
RICHARD F. SCHUBERT, (\
Solicitor,
GEORGE T. AVERY, © , . “
Associate Solicitor, a
, BEATE BLOCH, ‘ -.
Attorney, : 8
Department of Labor, .
Washington, D.C. 20216.
“
,
o>
. Se aed
6 OR BLADE OULLL IRL 0! DDE ALOE OP GOS
e 7 e
Ase . ree = SK, DRIEST. Meatless cae RINT ER TARE RIE as WOO eae Wie LETS ate eae 4 y oe ae
.
.
.
‘ :
. °
. _
. ‘
‘
.
-
- : >
.
-
.
o~
.
.
e
-
t
’
‘
*
.
*-
. ¢
.
° ‘ -
.
°° .
. .
e .
7 . .
.
-INDEX
Opinions below-__-_-_----------88
Jurisdiction. ------e
4, Decisions ghd orders below. eee :
Summary of argument_____________ me eee aise
Argument:
I. The statutory scheme of the Act and this .
Court’s decisions interpreting it are
inconsistent with petitioner’s claimed
right of intervention, <relememmere
II. The legislative history of the Act is
inconsistent with petitioner’s claimed
right of intervention jcmpmeese
III. The Secretary’s consistent inte rpretation
of the’statute should be followed unless
there are compelling indications that
it is Wrong__---_---
IV. Federal Rule 24 does not puters peti-
tioner’s intervention..____. _____.__
Conclusion_-_.--2------ =
14
to
bho
31
32
39
Il
CITATIONS
Cases:
Acuff v. United Papermakers and Paper-
workers, 404 1°. 2d 169, certiorari denied, Page
394 US. 987____ 33
Alleghany Corporation v. Kirby, 344 F. 2d a7 1,
certiorari granted, sub. nom. Holt v. -\lle-
gheny Corp., 381 U.S. 933, certiorari dis-
missed, 884 U.S. 28.088 33
Biodensien v. Boyle, 329 I. app. 1089____- 8, 35
Cathoon v. Harvey, 379 U.S. 134. ___.- 10, 15, 18, 32
Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. El Paso Natural
Gas Co., 386 U.S. 129.02 37
Hodgson vy. Local 67 99, United Steel W orkers of
-lmerica, 403 U.S. 3338_--. 19
International Union, UAW y. Scofield, 382
U.S. 205__.- 22 12, 19, 20
Eupion Mfg. Co. v. United States, 388 U.S.
BO gc et en op es i nk 37
Martin v. Kalvar Corp., 441 F.2d 552... = _-
Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Commu-
‘ necations Commission, 395 U.S. 367_____- 31
Shultz v.- United Steelworkers of -[merica,
‘District 15, 312 F. Supp. 1044___. 21,22
Shultz v. United Steelworkers of Ameriéa,
District 19, 318 F. Supp. 549... 21, 22
Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., 312 U.S. 1228. 32
Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education,
427. F. 2d 1352, certiorari denied sub nom.
Alexander v. Pasadena City Board of Educa-
tion, 402 U.S. 948... 38
Stadin Vv. Union E lectric Company, 309 I. 2d
6 ne ee A 33
Stein v. Wirtz, 366 F. 2d ISS, certiorari
denied, 386 U.S. 996.---- 6-8 21, 22
Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 122 31
Ill
Cases—Continuied
United States v. Atlantic Richfield Company,
90 F.R.D. 369, affirmed sub nom. Bartlett,
etal. v. United States, 401 US. 986__-2
United States v. Automobile Manufacturers
_ -lss’n, 307 FE, Supp. 617, affirmed sub nom.
City of New York vy. United States, et al.,
397 U.S. 248
Page
United States v. Harper & Row Publishers, .
Ine. (N.D. IIL, E.D., November 27, 1967),
affirmed -sub nom ( ‘ity of New York y.
United States, 390 US. 715__ eee eee
Cnited States y. Purdmouni Pictures, Lune.
(S.D.N.Y. Eq. No. 87-273, March 22, 1971.
affirmed sub nom. Syufy Enterprises, Inc. v.
United States, No. 70-329, decided October
12, 1971-27 eet
sub nom. Clark Walter and Sons, Inc. "vy.
United States, 392 U.S.659.....
Wirtz v. Hotel, Motel and Club Employees
Wnton, Local 6,391 U.S.492, 00
Wordz v. Local Union No. 12, etc., Operating
Engineers, 66 LRR\M 2080; 56 L.C. § 12,153
37
32
Wirtz v. Local Union No. 125, Laborers’ Inter- .
national Union, 389 U.S. 477...
Wertz v. Local 153, Glass Bottle Blowers lssn.,
389 U.S. 462... ere 14, 18,
19, 34
IV
_ Cases—Continued .
Wirtz v. Local Union No. 1377, 288 F. Supp. page
| nen Be eee 22
Yablonski v. United Mine Workers ‘(D.D.C.)-
Civ. No. 3436-69. ___. 1]
Statutes and rules: _ =
Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure
Act of 1959, 73 Stat. 519, 29 U.S.C. 401
et seq.:
7 Section 101(a)(1), 29 U.S.C: 411(a)(1)- 14
Section 102, 29 U.S.C. 412_.___ [5,35
Section 201, 29 U.S.C. 431___________ 10
Section 206, 29 U.S.C. 486.022.2228. 38
' Section 208, 29 U.S.C. 488_______ 8 15
Section 210, 29 U.S.C. 440__ 22 15,26
Section 401, 29 U.S.C. 481-020 15
Section 401(¢), 29 U.S.C. 481 (0) 2-8 15, 23
. Section 402, 29 U.S.C. 482. ___- 2, 16, 25, 22,86
Section 402(a), 29 U.S.C. 482(a)_- 2 8 16, 36 —
Section 402(b), 29 U.S.C. 482(b)_-- | 16
Section 403, 29 U.S.C. 483.02 2-8. _-. 2,16, 2s
Section 403(a), 29 U.S.C. 483(a)_____ — 39
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:
Rule 23(1)(e)_ ee. 3s
tule 24.02 2. oe Id, 32
| Rule 24(a)_---- ee a 13, 32.
Miscellaneous: ; =
104 Cong. Ree. 7953. eee eee - 23
104 Cong. Rec. 10947* 23,25
104 Cong. Rec. 10999. ee = 26
104 Cong. Rec. 11487____-- ee = at
104 Cong. Ree. 1I8288______ ee 26
105 Cong. Rec. 6745. ------- e289
105 Cong. Rec. IS116___-- ee —— 30
Summers, Judiical Reguiation of Union.
Elections, 70 Yale L.J. 1222.-- 1-2 23
Committee on Education and Labor, 86th Page
Cong., Ist Sess. 88 30
Hearings Before the Subeommittee on Labor
of the Senate Committee on Libor end
Public Welfare, 86th Cong., Ist Session. ___ 28, 39
H.R. 840000022 30
H. Rep. No. 1147, 86th Cong., 2d Sess 30
105 Cong. Ree. 17919.) 30
_ 105 Cong. Rec. 18153.- 30
8.505020 27, 28, 29
S. 7482000 es a ne ee 27, 28°
S. ee or ae 29
8.87510 23, 24
S. 3974.0 24, 26
S.. Rep. No. 1684, 85th Cong. 2d Sess _ _ 24
S. Rep. No. 187, 86th Cong., Ist Sess. 29
D.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1971
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.