Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Reed v. MCI WorldCom (No. 05-1562)

Supreme Court brief2006

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

(A Supreme ( o U.S.

No. 051562 JUN 5 ~ 2006

RHE OF EGE RR K

In The

Supreme Court of the Anited States

ALVIN REED,

Petitioner,

vs.

MCI WORLDCOM NETWORK

SERVICES INCORPORATED,

Respondent.

On Petition For Writ Of Certiorari

To The United States Court Of Appeals

For The Fourth Circuit

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

ALVIN REED, Pro Se

481 Lydia Perry Road

Sanford, NC 27330

(919) 774-1209

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW

Does the United States Constitution require that

evidence be considered that has no other explanation than

to be testimony from a Higher Power.

PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING

The parties to the proceeding are:

Alvin R. Reed, an individual, on behalf of himself.

MCI WORLDCOM NETWORK SERVICES IN-

CORPORATED, a corporation.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW................... i

PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING ...................scssceseeees ii

Ee Oe Hiiicitctttceentintisiiilainrbenceteies iii

CITATIONS OF REPORTS OF OPINIONS EN-

Ee Be Fe i itetciriinseititenianiscuedusesatnntoressins

A. The Proceeding Involves a Question of Excep-

tional Importance, in that the Result, If Undis-

turbed, Will Lead to Significant and Unnecessary

Restraint from the Original Intent of our Found-

I iisisceieedteseiced cucabasdihicossatnsbiiuiiurnniidensucs 4

APPENDICES:

Court of Appeals Opinion: Alvin R. Reed v. MCI

WorldCom Network Services, Incorporated............. App. 1

District Court Order granting dismissal .................... App. 3

District Court Order to extend time ..................:00064 App. 12

Significant paragraph from Plaintiff’s appeal of

NN iki scvsccicha cache alekihceatniaiuipiaecalar tes saieen tlcemaacanovel App. i

Initial Bible Code presented as part of North

Carolina Industrial Commission Plaintiff’s Re-

quest to Limit Scope and referenced in Federal

NIT cnieacuisnsliheavicnscnecosechassidaianbiadiuapideimeel hidaaiedaaadiseaases App. 15

TABLE OF CONTENTS -— Continued

Page

Prayer as testimony with available witnesses to

ST CRE TD ico sigs en ciensanlnisscncveiiansersnnencinseavensasanes App. 18

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Page

CASES:

Alvin Reed v. MCI WorldCom Network Services,

Incorporated, 2006 WL 1112850......................csesscsccceeeees 1

STATUTES:

a i ae eaecaoeiiennuouneinebonnane 2

I as dtsidinincuaneibiionies 2

Bg a itactniai:dccichscccininccenigciincivantecnninpunebecneimientinioslts 2

I al railed 2

ls By Ss RS SREGEESIRERERI Res irene cetiey Pi Stee ce lei en re 1

CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS:

8 AE a See a sesseseseeesseceosees 1

CIT: * ONS OF REPORTS OF

OPINIONS ENTERED IN THE CASE

Alvin Reed v. MCI WorldCom Network Services,

Incorporated, 2006 WL 1112850. App. 3.

BASIS FOR SUPREME COURT JURISDICTION

The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit entered

its unpublished per curiam opinion on April 26, 2006.

Petitioner Alvin Reed seeks review of that judgment on a

writ of certiorari.

Alvin Reed timely filed a petition to the Court of

Appeals. This Court has jurisdiction to review on a writ of

certiorari the judgment of a federal court of appeals under

28 U.S.C. § 1254(1).

CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INVOLVED IN THE CASE

Constitution of the United States, Amendment I,

Freedom to practice Religion.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

I began work with WorldCom/MCI as a contractor in

October of 1999 and was converted to a permanent em-

ployee on April 10, 2000. I attended work regularly

through January 21, 2005. During this time, the original

company went bankrupt and re-emerged as MCI, then

was later sold to Verizon. During my entire time at this

company, I was forced to use stolen property against my

will, which according to Title 17, section 504 and Title 18,

section 2319 of the US Code is a felony if I was not able to

prove it was under duress, punishable by significant fines

and imprisonment. At any time during my employment,

authorities could have asked me to provide proof of owner-

ship of the software on my computer under threat of this

imprisonment. This illegal software was discussed at

length between co-workers many times throughout my

employment, and it was my understanding that if you

wanted to keep your job, you commit the felonies and keep

your trap shut. I committed these felonies under duress

for all of this time, always afraid, up until August of 2003,

to bring up the issue at risk of losing my job. This time

frame is consistent with the time frame that the Sarbanes-

Oxley Act updated Title 18 of the US Code in section 1513

and 1514 to make it safer for employees to object to the

use of stolen property without fear of retaliation by their

employer.

During the process of coming out of bankruptcy in and

around the summer of 2003, employees were subjected to a

wide range of exposure to alleged claims of having become

an ethical company. Prior evidence submitted at lower

courts discuss this in detail. Starting in the summer of

2003, I became brave enough to start objecting to this

forced commission of felonies. Earlier emails and my

testimony prove beyond reasonable doubt that I had at the

time and continue to this day to have every reason to

believe that much of the software in use was stolen prop-

erty. Some items in question were directly informed to me

as being illegal by the software company itself. The defen-

dant has time and again refused to provide proof of owner-

ship of items in question. If they did have proof, it would

only take a few seconds to pull it out of an email or filing

cabinet. Most of the items in question were locally con-

trolled at the department level and therefore, any proof of

ownership would be locally available if it existed. I

brought this issue to the attention of the company many

times, and they have repeatedly refused to provide proof of

ownership.

I have found myself in a position of having to write

this brief pro se. While I am convinced that the facts and

the law are absolutely in my favor, my untrained hand has

led me to a position of having to present my case to the

Supreme Court without ever having had an opportunity to

get a subpoena signed asking the company to provide proof

of ownership of items in question. As a pro se claimant, I

have limited experience and know how to fully grasp why

this case was thrown out at the lower courts. It is against

my religion to commit felonies, and it is my age that made

it more likely that I would have strong religious beliefs

against using stolen property. It was the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act that made me brave enough to object to the use of

stolen property because I thought it would protect me from

retaliation.

The issue at hand is whether or not a person of faith

over the age of forty is more likely to object to the forced

commission of felonies and therefore be subject to retalia-

tion for objecting to the illegal use of stolen property at a

higher rate than a person not of faith under the age of

forty. Considerable evidence was presented at earlier

courts. The reversible error that I am presenting in this

case is that not all of the evidence is being considered. |

presented evidence that a Higher Power is testifying on my

behalf; however, I was never given an opportunity for oral

argument to tie it into this case. I point out immediately

that I am absolutely not a religious fanatic and am com-

pletely of sound mind. I am simply analyzing data and

drawing a logical conclusion as is done in any secular case.

I am requesting that the United States Supreme Court

give me an opportunity to present all evidence in a lower

court, even though many will question if a Higher Power

would be willing or able to intervene on my behalf in this

case for the purpose of curing a nation in moral decline.

,’

ARGUMENT

A. The Proceeding Involves a Question of Excep-

tional Importance, in that the Result, If Undis-

turbed, Will Lead to Significant and Unnecessary

Restraint from the Original Intent of our Found-

ing Fathers.

The argument can best be summarized in one ques-

tion by restating the QUESTION PRESENTED FOR

REVIEW (i.). Why did our Founding Fathers bother

praying to a Higher Power if they did not believe that this

Higher Power was willing and able to intervene on their

behalf? Or stated another way: Would the Higher Power

that our Founding Fathers prayed to and referred to in so

many documents be willing and able to create a series of

miracles over time with the express purpose of proving His

existence with intent of ~ddressing the moral decline of

this nation? Or stated specifically for this case: Do I have

the constitutional right to worship a God who instructs

me to not commit felonies and can | object to the commis-

sion of these felonies on religious grounds? As an un-

trained hand writing this appeal pro se, I beg the court’s

indulgence in understanding that I do not know the proper

legal means of getting across this message. I am actively

praying to this Higher Power for guidance in writing this

appeal. All errors are my own. I also point out to the court

that while my faith is Southern Baptist, the Southern

Baptists are in no way aware of or support my use of Bible

code. These findings are my own and are in no way sup-

ported, condoned, or refuted by my established faith

system. I contend to the court that these Bible codes were

given to me by a Higher Power to prove His existence. I

also point out that, with all due respect to those who read

this appeal, it requires an extremely high degree of spiri-

tual intellect to fully appreciate the mathematical prob-

ability that what I state in this appeal could statistically

never occur by random chance. I accept the fact that those

not strong in the spirit will mock and scorn me for writing

this appeal. I point out to the court that I myself do not

understand much of what God is revealing to me in writ-

ing this appeal. I reference Ezekiel 33:6 App. 22, para-

gravh 2, starting at line 11 as my reason for submitting

this appeal to the court.

App. 1 through App. 12 are the writings from the

earlier courts. No mention is ever given of the Bible code

or weather events presented other than the original order

was so ordered on the 13th day of the 10th month, on App.

10, line 9. The reason that I had given for including the

original Bible code on App. 16 was a request to the court

that the related workers compensation claim be heard on

this day by a state Industrial Commission court, App. 15,

paragraph 1, starting at line 12. This exact date, I con-

tend, ties the Bible code to this case. The reversible error

is that no other mention is ever made of the Bible code.

The prophesy was further fulfilled on the 31st of the 10th

month with Rosa Parks’ Bible code being tied to President

Bush on App. 35, starting at paragraph 5 and on App. 36,

paragraph 1. The method to find App. 35 was put on my

heart after the Rosa Parks’ code was fulfilled on the 31st

day of the 10th month. Highlighted on App. 35 is “what

hath thee base the consent sent by this ride, wrote salt,

write on salt.” I submit to the court that this was God’s

testimony te me to submit the appeal which was almost

past the statue of limitations at that point. “bush rosa sat

seat” is shown in App. 36 paragraph 1 as alternate letters

enclosed in parenthesis. I contend to the court that this

kind of Bible code simply does not occur by random

chance. The switch in number from 13 to 31 is shown

below in switching the first two letters of leon to elon, in

App. 16, paragraph 3. I ask the courts understanding that,

while the details can seem complex, this can be clearly

shown and explained in a full lower court hearing where

ample time is provided to explain each item at greater

length. I ask the court to understand that I am attempting

to explain what could be considered quite complex Bible

code in a very small amount of space. This Bible code is

not for the faint of heart.

I submit to the court that much of this testimony

came after the initial order and therefore should be con-

sidered because it did not exist prior to the close of the

initial case in the Federal District Court. I intend to show

the court that this new evidence ties directly to this case

and is therefore admissible evidence. I am writing this

case pro se with no legal training; however, one would

venture to reason that there is most likely limited verifi-

able prior case law on a non-secular testimony case. The

last paragraph of App. 13 is the location within my appeal

to the Fourth District Appeals Court that ties these

elements together and is supported by the remainder of

the appendices. It is first stated that these occurrences

could not have occurred by random chance. Any one, two,

or even three of the supporting testimony presented here

could have occurred by pure coincidence by the sheer

number of possible outcomes that could be deemed rele-

vant. What makes this case unexplainable by any other

means than from intervention o’ a Higher Power is that

the large number of highly improbable events all being

- linked and all relevant to this case. Every piece of Bible

code and weather event testimony presented here is

verifiable. Much of it, specifically the Bible code and

weather events, are completely out of the hands of any

person now or in the past. The 7 at the beginning of Rosa

Parks’ number, App. 13, paragraph 2, starting at line 5,

and App. 35, picture at top, is the sign of divinity which,

once all the evidence is tied together, shows that it is

testimony from a Higher Power.

It will be shown that the category 5 hurricanes came

in a set of 3 and peaked 53 days apart, as is consistent

with Rosa Parks’ number 7053. This limited length appeal

does not afford the luxury of describing in detail the

importance of these numbers. The limited space I have

here talks about several different numbers. The key to

understanding the significance of this testimony is the 53

scattered throughout. All other numbers in this testimony

refer back to this 53, and by Bible code and weather events

that could only have come from a Higher Power, and

absolutely could not have occurred by random chance. I

respectfully request the court to provide me oral argument

in lower court to better explain these findings than can be

done in a few pages of this brief.

This second paragraph, App. 13, paragraph 2, starting

at line 10, also points out that there are 53 chapter four

verse sixes in the Holy Bible as shown on App. 36, starting at

paragraph 3 through the bottom of App. 41. This chapter

and verse were in the court records prior to Rosa Parks’

interaction with President Bush and prior to the hurri-

canes. Witnesses can testify to my Sunday School lesson,

noted in App. 26, starting on line 30, about there being 39

chapter seven verse fours in the Holy Bible. This Sunday

School lesson was taught a few days before the honorable

Chief Justice was announced by the President. It was

stated on the news media that the now Honorable Chief

Justice John Roberts presented before the Supreme Court

39 times. I should point out that the first word in the Bible

code for Roberts is “robe.” The significance of the seven

and four were discussed in that Sunday School lesson and

will be described briefly in this argument. There was a 5.3

earthquake, App. 14, starting at line 4, and App. 25

starting at line 15, on the date noted on my email from

Senator Feinstein. I argue that it is unlikely that an out-

of-state person receive an email from Senator Feinstein at

all, and the chances of an earthquake occurring that

morning is extremely improbable. The chances of that

earthquake being of exactly 5.3 magnitude is astronomi-

cal. The fact that seven earthquakes occurred off the coast

of northern California over a four-day span, App. 25,

starting at line 9, along with these other conditions, make

this unquestionably an act of God. Note that the 5.3

earthquake, App. 25, starting at line 15 occurred at 53

minutes after the hour. The seven and four tie this to the

earlier events. MCI is first found in the Holy Bible at

character 50003, thus tying the significance of the 53 to-

MCI. MCIINC is the Bible Code which proves that a

Higher Power is testifying on my behalf of what happened

to me at MCI Incorporated. This data requires quite

intense spiritual intellect to fully grasp. The remainder of

this argument is devoted to explaining in some detail how

all this code and events are displayed and explained.

On Sunday, January 23, 2005, my children were

taken out of my home for their own protection from expo-

sure to my completely irrational and uncontrollable

behavior. The following day, my doctor ordered me not to

return to an environment where I would be subjected to

management approved forced commission of felonies, and

resulting hostile environment. My doctor diagnosed my

condition as situational anxiety. I kept my doctor informed

periodically until I lost my health coverage in October of

2005 that my company continued to refuse to address the

management approved forced commission of felonies

situation and my doctor continued to periodically write

down his recognition of my situational anxiety condition

from the resulting hostile work conditions.

During this week of January 23, 2005, with our

children out of our home, my wife and I broke down in

tears asking God what he wanted from us. He gave me the

vision that week that I later recorded and provided as a

Sunday School lesson. The prayer begins on the second

paragraph of App. 18 and ends at the end of App. 21. This

prayer with additions was given to the defendant as

discovery in my workers’ compensation case prior to many

of the events discussed in this appeal. I submit to the court

that this is an affect/cause as opposed to cause/effect thus

proving that this was a vision from a Higher Power to

record events going forward in exchange for this Higher

Power returning our children. I submit to the court to

consider the last paragraph of App. 21 as proof that this

Higher Power had a greater purpose than for the recom-

bining of just my family alone.

Within twenty-four hours of this vision, this Higher

Power that had given me this vision also revealed to me

how to extract His testimony on my behalf out of the Holy

Bible. I can only testify on my behalf that at no prior time

before receiving this vision did I ever do any work or write

any code of any kind relating to Bible code. I, in fact, had

been a staunch doubter of Bible code, and even a staunch

doubter of some of the interpretations of scripture of my

established belief system teachings. I testify here that,

with the direct intervention of God himself, I was able to

write a program from start to finish and derive Bible code

on iny first try that revealed direct testimony from God on

my behalf, and I further state that I now realize this

Higher Power’s complete purpose is in healing a nation in

moral decline. This Bible code is stated on lines five and

six of App. 16. in full and App. 17, starting at line 6.

“mciinc: elon (leon) that hate tenth rid hot sore reed shut

ate.” It was “Leon” King at “MCIINC” who got “rid” of

many earlier people from my department. I contend to the

court that it is God’s testimony that I was the “tenth”

person that Leon King had hatred for and got rid of, many

within MCI itself. I admit freely to the court that I was

“hot and sore” about this running me off because of my

objections to the use of stolen property. While there may

have been many reasons for his “hate” for the others, I

contend to this court that my objections to the use of

pirated software were what initiated and perpetuated the

increasingly hostile environment as to why he was after

me. I contend to the court that Leon King had a consider-

able amount of influence on the project manager Pamela

Hogg and was therefore directly responsible for ridding me

from the department, per God’s testimony from this Bible

code. I also contend that it is God’s testimony that 8 (“ate”)

of the 10 were “shut” up. God and myself are the only

remaining to bring this issue into play. Note that the el is

switched on the first word because leon in not found in the

Bible. This switching became more obvious when the 13

and 31 were switched from the dates noted on the original

order of the 13th of October and Rosa Parks’ in Washing-

ton D.C. on the 31st of October.

App. 17 further shows the company names involved

during this interval. Worldcom changed its name to MCI

Inc. During this time period, both Qwest and Verizon were

considering buying the company. Bible code for each name

shows a series of mathematically impossible items to have

occurred by random chance. Mciinc is at an interval of 13

while Worldcom is at an interval of 13019, the 19 being

the number of terrorists on September eleventh. The 13 is

the beginning verse in my sermon in front of Terri

- Schiavo’s hospice Good Friday showing God’s prediction

that she would die on day 13. A portion of the sermon

noting the 13 was recorded for posterity by the news

media at the event. Qwest is at an interval of 77 and

Worldcom is at in interval of 40077. The 77 is the day of

the 4 bombs on the 7th day of the 7th month in London,

England. Note that these bombings occurred after this

Bible code was generated. Senator Feinstein, who sent me

the letter dated the day of the 5.3 earthquake noted below

has an interval of 4554 noted not only my state house

precinct number of 45 (Asbury) an? district of 54, but is

also the last two digits of the startin, © aracter for mciinc

shown on line 6 of App. 17. On this same line, 8:43, noted

at the top of App. 16 is_releyant Bible verse John 8:43:

“Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye

cannot hear my word.” Note on App. 17, line three, the 454

is the number of milliseconds it takes to run that particu-

lar Bible code. I submit to the court ‘%ct I did not know

until months later that this is the number of pages in the

Da Vinci code book. I should also point out that within the

past couple of days, Senator Feinstein’s rating on www.

Congress.org is 54.54, yet another confirmation from a

Higher Power. I submit to the court that it is no accident

that the high 53 occurrence and high 54 occurrence being

1 number apart, the number of unity that needs to be

added to address the moral decline of our society. I also

submit to the court that it may be centuries before these

discoveries I am pointing out are fully appreciated and

understood. My statement here that gravity will be deter-

mined to be a repulsive force will make doubters wonder

in years to come how I knew that in advance if not through

Bible code.

The means of deriving Bible code from a given word is

very simple. All the alphabetical letters of the Original

King James English version of the Holy Bible, as I was led

to several years ago by downloading from the internet, are

put in an array of characters. All spaces, headings, verse

numbers, and punctuation are removed. This array of

letters is searched from beginning to end first looking

every 2nd character, then every 3rd character, then every

4th character and so forth until the word in found. This

skip sequence is continued from that point for 7 times 70

total characters at that skip level. This set of 490 charac-

ters is then searched for words that are found in the Holy

Bible. This is the resulting words. The numbers associated

with this set of words is the character number that the

sequence starts, the skip level, and the number of words

found. Thus, an exact set of numbers and an exact set of

words is derived for any word that is entered into the

program. All Bible code noted in this appeal uses exactly

that same program and methodology to derive the resulting

numbers and words. For proof, a zipped version of this

program along with the exact version of the Holy Bible

used is available online at http://bible.alvinreed.com/word.

zip. I respectfully request the Supreme Court to provide

me the opportunity to prove these facts in a lower court.

The morning of my Sunday School lesson July 3rd,

2005, it was put on my heart to talk about the distinctions

of 7 and 4. My initial thoughts were that this was to

signify that the following day was the Fourth of July, the

7th month and the 4th day. It was not until after I com-

pleted my Sunday School lesson that I fully realized the

significance of my discussion that day. In summary, my

Sunday School lesson was three significant weather events

had occurred with regard to 7 and 4. I pointed out to my

Sunday School that I determined just that morning that

the 4 hurricanes in Florida the summer before had oc-

curred over 7 weeks from the time Charlie hit land until

Jeanne was completely off the map, as I found on the

internet that morning, App. 25, starting from the 5th line

from the bottom, thus the significance of 7 and 4. The 7th

largest earthquake occurred the day after Easter, App. 26,

line 16, and App. 24, line 24, and the 4th largest earth-

quake had occurred the day after Christmas, App. 25, last

line, and App. 24, line 18, thus once again the significance

of 7 and 4. I should point out that the 4th largest earth-

quake is reported as some locations as the 5th largest and

at other locations at the 3rd largest, again tying these

values to the overriding number 53. There were 7 recent

earthquakes off the coast of northern California that

occurred over a four-day span, once again showing the

significance of the 7 and 4. I point out to the court that it

was not until after Rosa Parks’ passing many months later

that I realized that a 5.3 earthquake occurred the date

stated on my email from Senator Feinstein, App. 23. I also

point out to the court that it was not until after I received

the order from the appeals court that I realized that it was

exactly 153 days from the 7th largest earthquake until the

peak of the first category five hurricane. The 153 is signifi-

cant because of the 153 fish caught by the disciples. The

missing unity of 1 is the significance of the 53. Also 100,

the difference between the 153 and the 53 is 10 squared

which is Biblical for the 10 commandments, one of those

commandments noted in earlier testimony.

The morning of this Sunday School lesson, I felt led to

print out all chapter 7 verse 4s in the Holy Bible and

distributed that list to my Sunday School. I noted specifi-

cally that there were exactly 39 of such verses, having no

idea why this Higher Power led me to make that distinc-

tion. It was a few days later, when the Honorable Chief

Justice was first announced to the world by President

Bush and the number of times of 39 argued to the high

court was a significant number to everyone in the media. I

contend to this court that I had no advance knowledge of

that occurrence. It was not until after Rosa Parks’ death

that I realized that there were 53 chapter four verse

sixes in the Holy Bible. I contend that the Higher Power

led me to have witnesses for my Sunday School lesson

indicating the number of chapter 7 verse 4s in the Holy

Bible in preparation for this eventual disclosure, the first

of which talks about God controlling the weather in

Genesis 7:4. It was the day that Harriet Myers was ap-

pointed to high court that I had just purchased a Palm

Pilot Zire. Upon learning this, I felt led to look up the

Bible code for “Harriet Myers Zire.” The words associated

with Zire, “roe yes” led me to conclude that Harriet Myers

was still a believer in Roe vs. Wade. I sent several emails

to this affect to the White House that can be used to testify

to this fact. This revelation is consistent with what even-

tually led to her retraction and the appointment of a

replacement justice on the Supreme Court, notably the

Honorable Justice Samuel Alito. I contend to the court

that this entire set of events was playing out Bible code,

most of which the exact location has not yet been revealed

to me.

On August 22nd, 2005, I submitted to the defendant

the letter starting the second paragraph on App. 27

through the end of App. 29. This was put on my heart by

what I interpreted to be a Higher Power. The next day,

August 23rd, 2005, was the start of the confirmation from

this Higher Power that He approved of my letter and

agreed with its findings. App. 30, first picture, shows that

the first of three category five hurricanes started at 5 P.M.

the day after I submitted this letter to the defendant. The

illustration for hurricane Katrina on App. 31 shows 6:51

as the time of the first snapshot of Katrina becoming a

category 5 hurricane. App. 34, first paragraph after the

calendar, shows the Bible verse relating to weather that

this time stamp signifies. App. 32 shows 3:53 as the time

of the snapshot for Rita as a category 5 hurricane. App. 34,

second paragraph after the calendar, shows the Bible

verse tying Rosa Parks to this event. App. 33 shows 6:38

as the time of the final snapshot of Wilma as a category 5

hurricane. App. 34, third paragraph after the calendar,

shows the Bible verse tying the Da Vinci code Bible code to

this event. Wilma showed a distinct 2 just before hitting

land. 5 to the power of 2 is 25. 3 to the power of 2 is 9.

Jesus is found every 25th character creating 9 words by

the technique used consistently since January 2005. The

word Jesus in Bible code creates in part “eber (Ebbers)

wife end art,” signifying that this case initiated with

Bernie Ebbers’ actions would end the art (movie) of Da

Vinci code claiming Jesus had a wife. I submit to this court

that no one including myself could have had advanced

knowledge of the weather events that would trigger the

fulfillment of this Bible code debunking the Da Vinci code

and disproving it merely by its prediction. The calendar on

App. 34 clearly shows the 53-day interval between the

peaks of the category 5 hurricanes occurring 3 times in one

season.

The coal mine accidents near the end of 2005 and

beginning of 2006 revealed to me through a local newspa-

per article that 53 men lost their lives many years ago in

what is now my voting precinct, noted above as precinct

45. It was the largest mining accident in North Carolina

history. The stone marker noting these 53 lost lives is

prominent today within my voting precinct. I vote in

Asbury community building. The Bible code for asbury

includes the phrase: “down i oak heat hole been held.” I

submit to this court that even if I had known about this

prior to these weather events, which I did not, any reason-

able person would still conclude that this propensity of

events of 53 could not have occurred by random chance.

The probability of finding such exacting Bible code for this

event is astronomical. That it involved 53 lives is even

more mathematically unlikely. I submit to the court that

the fact it occurred in my voting precinct is virtually nil to

be considered a random event. This, once again, is a

Higher Power directly pointing to the fact that MCI is

found starting at character 50003.

I submit to the court that no reasonable person would

conclude that these hurricanes, along with all the other

weather and Bible code events could have occurred by any

other means than an Intelligent Designer, thus proving

the existence of God and the courts necessity to conform to

original intent by accepting that an Intelligent Designer

was involved in the creation of the events noted here.

Review of the earlier Court decision through a writ of

certiorari will yield a result for righteous employees of

faith over the age of forty that conforms to the original

intent of our Founding Fathers and restores harmony and

preserves fundamental notions of a righteous government.

Respectfully submitted,

ALVIN REED, Pro Se

May 2006

App. 1

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2321

ALVIN R. REED,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MCI WORLDCOM NETWORK

SERVICES, INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C.

Dever III, District Judge. (CA-05-517-5)

Submitted: April 10, 2006 Decided: April 26, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvin R. Reed, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Allen Sar, John

Ellison Branch III, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,

App. 2

SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this

circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Alvin R. Reed appeals the district court’s order grant-

ing MCI’s motion to dismiss his claim of disparate impact

based on age, pursuant to the Age Discrimination in

Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (2000) (ADEA). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Reed v. MCI Worldcom Network Servs.,

Inc., No. CA-05-517-5 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 2005). We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the deci-

sional process.

AFFIRMED

App. 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

WESTERN DIVISION

No. 5:05-CV-517-D(3)

ALVIN R. REED,

)

Plaintiff, |

v. ) ORDER

MCI, INC.,

Defendant. )

Alvin R. Reed (age 48) filed a pro se complaint alleg-

ing that MCI Network Services, Inc. (“MCI”) demoted him

“for refusing to commit felonies” associated with using

“pirated software.” Specifically, as part of his complaint

and his EEOC charge, Reed contends that he “was dis-

criminated against for refusing to commit felonies because

{his} generation wants to obey the law and the younger

generation is too unethical to understand the concept,”

and that he was “discriminated against because of [his]

age in violation of the ADEA.” Pursuant to Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), MCI has moved to dismiss the

complaint for failure to state a claim. In response, Reed

clarified that his claim was based on a disparate impact

theory under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

(“ADEA”). For the reasons stated below, MCI’s motion to

dismiss is granted.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

In analyzing a motion to dismiss a complaint under

Rule 12(b)(6) for “failure to state a claim upon which relief

can be granted,” a court must determine whether the

App. 4

complaint is sufficient “under the facts alleged and undar

any facts that could be proved in support of the com-

plaint.” E. Shore Mkts., Inc. v. J.D. Assocs. Ltd. P’ship, 213

F.3d_175, 180 (4th Cir. 2000). A court “assume[s] the truth

of all facts alleged in the complaint and the existence of

any fact that can be proved, consistent with the com-

plaint’s allegations.” Jd. A court need “not accept the legal

conclusions drawn from the facts.” Id. “Similarly, [a court]

need not accept as true unwarranted inferences, unrea-

sonable conclusions, or arguments.” Jd.

Reed filed a pro se complaint, which entitles him to

some leeway. See Cox v. City of Charleston, 416 F.3d 281,

288 (4th Cir. 2005). Nonetheless, “[w]hile pro se com-

plaints may represent the work of an untutored hand

requiring special judicial solicitude, a district court is not

_required to recognize obscure or extravagant claims

defying the most concerted efforts to unravel them.” Weller

vu. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 901 F.2d 387, 391 (4th Cir. 1990)

(affirming dismissal of sex discrimination disparate

treatment claim) (internal quotations omitted); Edwards v.

Johnston County Health Dep’t, 885 F.2d 1215, 1221-24 (4th

Cir. 1989) (affirming dismissal of race discrimination

disparate impact claim). Further, reviewing a pro se

complaint “does not transform the court into an advocate.

Only those questions which are squarely presented to a

court may properly be addressed.” Id.

DISCUSSION

Reed alleged that MCI discriminated against him

because of his age in violation of the ADEA. 29 U.S.C.

§§ 621-634 (2000). Reed’s complaint identifies the acts

complained of as his failure to be promoted, his demotion

App. 5

for refusing to commit felonies, and his receipt of a hostile

phone call to his house after asking the CEO for help in

connection with using pirated software. Compl. J 4. Reed

alleges that MCI committed age discrimination “because of

disparity in man’s law and God’s law over past generation

making pirated code rampant in corporate America.”

Compl. 7 6. Reed identifies the nature of his complaint as

follows:

[MCI] [florced me to use pirated software against

my will, tricked me into thinking that MCI is an

ethical company, and initiated a hostile phone

call to my home as a direct result of my wife's

plea for help from the office of the CEO of MCI

on this ethical issue, as noted in the attached

documents.

Compl. { 9.

Reed attached his EEOC charge to the complaint. In

that charge Reed alleges that on January 21, 2005, he was

“demoted from [his] position as a Senior Staff Programmer

... because fhe] refused to commit felonies by using

questionable software.” EEOC Charge (I. Reed also

alleges that on January 21, 2005, he was “reprimanded by

{his} Project Manager, Pamela Hugg, because of [his] job

performance,” and that after complaining to the Ethics

Committee, he “received a hostile telephone call from some

of its members because [his] wife had contacted Michael

Cappellas, CEO concerning [his] treatment and requesting

assistance.” Id. J Il. Reed’s EEOC charge then concludes:

“I believe that I was discriminated against for refusing to

commit felonies because my generation wants to obey the

law and the younger generation is too unethical to under-

stand the concept. I believe that [sic] was discriminated

App. 6

against in [sic] because of my age 48, [sic] violation of

ADEA.” Id. { III.

Reed also attached documents to his complaint stating

his belief that MCI took adverse employment action

against him because he objected to felonious activities. See

“Alvin Reed versus MCI Inc., Summary Sheet” { 2; “Short

Term Disability Appeal For Prudential Insurance” {{ 2, 5;

“Chronological Order of Events Leading to my Wrongful

PIP (written 5/26/05)” {J 4, 6, 12; various e-mails raising

concerns about “pirated software.” MCI filed a Rule

12(b)(6) motion to dismiss and argued that the allegations

in the complaint affirmatively disproved that age was a

determining factor in the relevant employment decisions.

See MCI Mem. at 4-7. Specifically, MCI argued that Reed’s

complaint and the documents attached to his complaint

state that Reed believed he was demoted and harassed

because he refused to commit felonies by 7 question-

able software.’

MCI’s argument is not without force. In response,

Reed asked the court to wait until MCI provided proof of

ownership of the software. “Plaintiff’s Appeal to Motion to

Dismiss” at 1. Reed also clarified that his “age discrimina-

tion case is based on the Supreme Court decision in March

of this year stating that age discrimination is valid if

persons over the age of forty are more adversely affected

than persons under the age of forty.” Jd. Reed also con-

firmed his belief that “[a]ge discrimination was an indirect

consequence of rampant pirated software.” Id. at 4.

* MCI denies the improper use of software or illegal harassment.

App. 7

Given that Reed has clarified that he is pursuing a

disparate impact claim under the ADEA pursuant to 29

U.S.C. § 623(aX(2) and Smith v. City of Jackson, 125 S. Ct. -

1536 (2005), this court will determine whether he has

stated a claim of disparate impact under the ADEA. An

ADEA disparate impact claim involves a challenge to a

facially neutral employment practice that allegedly ad-

versely impacts those age 40 and over. The facially neutral

employment practice is usually an employer’s selection

criterion for employment, such as an aptitude or intelli-

gence test, or a strength requirement. In connection with

ADEA disparate impact claims, examples of such facially

neutral employment practices litigated in other cases

include a decision to discharge employees due to high

salaries or due to tenure. See, e.g., Wooden v. Board of Ed.,

931 F. 2d 376, 379 (6th Cir. 1991); Dace v. ACF Indus., 722

F.2d 374, 378 (8th Cir. 1983).

In order to state a claim of disparate impact, “it is not

enough to simply allege that there is a disparate impact on

workers, or point to generalized policy that leads to such

an impact.” Smith, 125 S. Ct. at 1545 (emphasis added).

Rather, the employee is “responsible for isolating and

identifying the specific employment practices that are

allegedly responsible for any observed statistical dispari-

ties.” Id. (emphasis added) (citation and internal quota-

tions omitted).

Reed nowhere identifies what is considered a facially

neutral employment practice (e.g., a strength requirement;

a requirement to take and pass an aptitude test; a re-

quirement that an applicant have a high school diploma).

Instead, Reed identifies the practice at issue as the feloni-

ous use of pirated software. Reed then couples that alleged

practice with his view that the “younger generation” is

App. 8

willing to use pirated software without objection. Thus,

Reed’s theory is that the felonious use of pirated software

has a disparate impact on workers age 40 and over be-

cause those age 40 and over understand the need to obey

the law and will not use the pirated software and thereby

are subject to adverse employment action at MCI.

Reed’s complaint and the EEOC charge attached to

the complaint confirm this “logic.” Reed’s EEOC charge

states (1) that he was “discriminated against for refusing

to commit felonies” associated with using pirated software

and (2) that the younger generation is too unethical to

understand this concept. In making this argument, Reed

contends that proof that employees at MCI used non-

licensed software and proof of the alleged generational

differences will demonstrate that MCI violated the ADEA.

Reed’s claim fails for a number of reasons. First, Reed

has simply identified an alleged “generalized policy” — the

use of pirated software. See Smith, 125 S.Ct. at 15465.

Reed has failed to identify a “specific employment prac-

tice.” Id. Thus, he fails to state a claim.

Second, Reed’s argument is a non sequitur because the

conclusion (i.e., age discrimination) does not follow from

the premises by which it is supposed to be supported. Even

if MCI did not have proper licenses for the software that

Reed or other employees used, the absence of such licenses

is not logically connected to Reed’s proposed conclusion

(i.e., age discrimination at MCI against those 40 and

older). Stated differently, as a matter of law, the conclusion

that MCI discriminated against Reed based on his age

cannot be drawn as a permissible, let alone reasc able

inference, from the presence of non-licensed software. Cf.

E. Shore Mkts., Inc., 213 F.3d at 180 (in reviewing a

App. 9

motion to dismiss, a court need not accept as true unwar-

ranted inferences, unreasonable conclusions, or argu-

ments). Accordingly, even if the court assumes that all

employees faced the presence of non-licensed software,

that assumed fact cannot by any logical process lead to a

conclusion that MCI “limit[ed], segregate[d], or classif [ied]

[its] employees in any way which would deprive or tend to

deprive any individual of employment opportunities or

otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee,

because of his age.” 29 U.S.C. § 623(a)(2).

Finally, as for Reed’s second premise concerning the

lack of ethics of the “younger generation,” this court

cannot conceive of admissible evidence that Reed could

submit to prove that those under age 40 at MCI are “too

unethical to understand” the need to obey laws against

pirating software. Further, even if he could prove this

premise, such proof is not logically connected to proving

that MCI violated 29 U.S.C. § 623(a)(2). Instead, such

proof would show that the cause of the alleged harm to

Reed was not any specific employment practice that MCI

adopted, but instead was an allegedly unethical class of

people under age 40. Cf. Watson v. Fort Worth Bank &

Trust, 487 U.S. 977, 994 (1988) (“Once the employment

practice at issue has been identified, causation must be

proved; that is, the plaintiff must offer statistical evidence

of a kind and degree sufficient to show that the practice in

question has caused the exclusion of applicants for jobs or

promotions because of their membership in a protected

group.”); Anderson v. Douglas & Lomason Co., 26 F.3d

1277, 1284 (Sth Cir. 1994) (upholding district court’s

refusal to analyze the plaintiffs’ claims using the disparate

impact model because the plaintiffs did not identify a

specific aspect of the employer’s subjective decision making

App. 10

that was shown to have any causal connection to the

alleged class-based imbalance in the employer’s work-

place); Edwards, 885 F.2d at 1223 (finding that complaint

failed to contend that defendant’s actions affected pro-

tected class to a greater degree than non-protected class).

CONCLUSION

The defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED. This the 13 day of October, 2005.

/s/ James Dever

JAMES C. DEVER, ITI

United States District Judge

App. 11

United States District Court

Eastern District of North Carolina

ALVIN R. REED,

Plaintiff, Judgment in a Civil Case

y, Case Number:

MCL, INC., 5:05-CV-517-D(3)

Defendant.

(Filed Oct. 14, 2005)

X Decision by Court. This action came to trial or

hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or

heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that

the Defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this

action is hereby DISMISSED.

JUDGMENT FILED AND ENTERED OCTOBER 14,

2005, AND COPIES MAILED TO:

Alvin R. Reed

Plaintiff Pro Se

481 Lydie Perry Rd.

Sanford, NC 27330

Robert A. Sar, Esq.

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART

P.O. Box 31608

Raleigh, NC 27622

October 14, 2005 FRED L. BORCH III, CLERK

/s/ Rebecca Bowen

(by) Deputy Clerk

App. 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

WESTERN DIVISION

CASE NO. 5:05-CV-517-D(3)

REED, ALVIN R. )

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER

vs. ) :,

) (Filed Aug. 17, 2005)

MCI, INC., ‘

Defendant. )

The Defendant MCI, Inc.’s Motion to Extend Time to

answer or otherwise respond has been considered and it

appears good cause supports the Motion.

It is ordered that Defendant shall have to and includ-

ing September 6, 2005 to serve an Answer or otherwise

respond to the Complaint in this case.

This 16th day of August, 2005. FRED L. BORCH III,

CLERK

/s/ Fred L. Borch

Clerk/

App. 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

WESTERN DIVISION

materi site Case No.:

Plaintiff, ) No. 5:05-CV-517-D(3)

vs. ) PLAINTIFF’S APPEAL

MCI, INC., ) OF ORDER

Defendant. (Filed Nov. 10, 2005)

* *” *

court is deciding if she should be imprisoned for using

stolen property. Rosa Parks provides to this court evidence

consistent with what I have provided in the form of emails.

The paradox is: would this court imprison Rosa Parks,

even though she objected to the use of stolen property. I

remind the court that, in this parable, Rosa Parks repeat-

edly objected to the use of stolen property to the employer.

Now substitute myself, not as the defendant, but as the

plaintiff, into this analogy of a person of faith over the age

of forty. Do I get the same constitutional rights as Rosa

Parks?

What I state in this paragraph, I point out can draw many

different conclusions. I do point out as fact that these could

not have occurred by random chance. I draw here no conclu-

sions other than relational facts which are verifiable must be

accepted into evidence.7 is the number of completion. Rosa

Park’s mug shot, 7053, ended in 53. Numbers 7:53 in the

Holy Bible indicates the number 5 for 3 different items. This

year, category 5 hurricanes occurred 3 times over 53 days.

This occurred August twenty eighth through October

nineteenth. There are 53 chapter four verse sixes in the

App. 14

Holy Bible, the first of which was mentioned previously in

this case. Genesis four, verse six denotes the first pre-

meditated murder, Genesis three denotes the first sin and

at every other character notes “Rosa sat seat”. There was a

5.3 earthquake in California the day of the date noted on

my email from Senator Feinstein, also noted previously.

MCI is first found every other character at position 50003

in the Original King James Version of the Holy Bible. I

remind the court that there are grown men and women in

institutions of higher learning that claim gravity has no

Intelligent Designer. While I

* * *

App. 15

NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

ALVIN R. REED )

na )

Plaintiff, ) LC. FILE NO. 536388

a ) PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

MCI, INC., TO LIMIT SCOPE

Defendant. )

As a non attorney, I am asking the court to limit the scope

of this case strictly to proof of ownership of the items in

question. I maintain any reasonable person of faith over

the age of forty would be expected to experience anxiety

when being forced to commit felonies over an extended

period, then learning that the felonious activity is man-

agement approved. I maintain that setting a precedent

where any employee who objects to felonious activity

would have to provide his life’s history to feed his family is

irrelevant and totally out of the scope of an employee who

is forced to commit felonies under duress. Per attachment,

I request oral argument on the original date of the 13th

day of the 10th month.

Dated this 19th day of September, 2005

/s/ Alvin Reed

481 Lydia Perry Road

Sanford, NC 27330

Alvin Reed

* * +

C:\Godswork \ letters>ic

C:\Godswork \letters>find “John8:43” kjv.txt

App. 16

eee ee eee KJV.TXT .

John 8:43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even

because ye cannot hear my word

C:\Godswork \letters>java words mciinc

mciinc (843054:13:10) elon, that, hate, tenth, rid, hot, sore,

reed, shut, ate,

875

C:\Godswork \letters>java letters mciinc 13

mciinc

lordthussaiththelordofhostsirememberthatwhichamal

ekdidtoisrathelordofhostsirememberthatwhichamalek

didtoisraelhowhelaidwasirememberthatwhichamalek

didtoisraelhowhelaidwaitforhiminthetwhichamalekdi

dtoisraelhowhelaidwaitforhiminthewaywhenhecamei

dtoisraelhowhelaidwaitforhiminthewaywhenhecameu

pfromegyptnohelaidwaitforhiminthewaywhenhecame

upfromegyptnowgoandsmiteamhiminthewaywhenhec

ameupfromegyptnowgoandsmiteamalekandutterlenh

ecameupfromegyptnowgoandsmiteamalekandutterlyd

estroyallth

mciincpttlenhnicdttemoaddideletoletelohfnfmaaaorahkedo

petogtthtIlneenatumeeehtireragaoguoeticlpeewsadelonritiit

eathateeeidretdahdteasaistraiotenthmiecfteruntlietintatfe

oippxtheridaiatiinhotahmnwssdujotdgairenrbdoirruehsore

edtjmraolhatdrkesvbanhsirhpdeirmftmsyuewlaitmgmdlssi

ahlcgephinashutleentedrlaiohigitleheinisihetccdhdetleumi

ktewiiesiioumsesatearonhebdonhsehssoweorinbnecmmnec

ivomsttnnrrhytepddotmstsalnksnstodtnoutdumiplrdntbice

oerohlaeeoepntleetneonosbhniarnmthagadihowbntsnsellhe

tltr

App. 17

elon, that, hate, tenth, rid, hot, sore, reed, shut, ate,

843054:13:

843054:13:454

C:\Godswork\letters>java words mciinc worldcom qwest

verizon feinstein

mciinc (843054:13:10) elon, that, hate, tenth, rid, hot, sore,

reed, shut, ate,

eee ere reeree

worldcom (326026:13019:9) world, tell, in, here, meet,

hewn, tents, leaf, horem,

qwest (1612324:77:11) west, oren, rent, lees, tin, heat,

TISCS, GHG, CESS, TOC, BEC pecocescecsecescccocvoccccovscescsoesees

verizon (1989514:40077:13) aher,; here, error, use, ear, tie,

non, onan, thy, soil, fens, what, hats, ....

feinste’ .1 (973786:4554:9) aher, here, aha, doeth, i, seat,

fat, tema, city, 2268532

C:\Godswork \letters>

* * *

App. 18

Did the Founding Fathers intend the Judicial Branch of

government to consider evidence that has no other expla-

nation then to be testimony from a higher power? If the

evidence presented here is not considered sufficient, I feel

led to respectfully request oral argument. My proof is in

this prayer put on my heart in preparation for my Sunday

school lesson on July 3rd, 2005 shortly before my family

drove to Washington, D.C. to pray inside of the Supreme

Court that God give guidance to President Bush in select-

ing the next Supreme Court Justice.

Dear God,

Thank you for getting my attention. For twenty three years

you asked me to go to Nineveh. You knew all along that I

would continue to refuse. I now realize that was all battle

training. I was in your boot camp all those years. Your

training methods God are so powerful that I actually

thought it was the real thing. I now realize I was in your

boot camp preparing for the real war ahead. You knew,

when the time was right, I would be well conditioned for

battle for I was battle trained in your loving care, all along

not realizing that my refusal to go to Nineveh was your

plan all along. You knew, God that you could break every

bone in my body and I would have continued to refuse to go

to Nineveh. You knew, God that you could have ravaged my

entire body with painful sores and I would have continued

to refuse to go to Nineveh. You knew, God that you could

have taken away my food, my clothing, and my shelter and

I would have continued to refuse to go to Nineveh.

For all of those years while you were training me for

battle, you knew all along that taking away from my wife

and me our most prized processions was the only way to

get our attention, was the only way to convince us to go to

App. 19

Nineveh. You took away our children. You got our atten-

tion God. In our living room, on our knees, in tears, we

gave ourselves completely to you that lonely evening in

January. We now realize that you had just conferred our

graduation from your boot camp of life and now it was

time to make the journey to the real battleground. We had

no source of income for this journey. We trusted in you to

provide. We gave back to you that evening only a tiny

portion of what you have so richly blessed us with for so

many years, knowing full and well that we could trust you

to provide, which you did in overabundance in the coming

days. Days later, you heard my prayer to stop sending us

money in abundance for we started feeling guilty finding

large hoards of found money in the mail every time we

went to the mail box over the next few days. Some would

call it a coincidence. Call it what you may, you provided us

in abundance for trusting you that evening.

You held our children in your loving arms in the boat to

Nineveh. All we need do was walk across the water, from

the safety of the solid rock shore to the boat to Nineveh.

We knew that as long as we kept our eyes on you, we could

walk across the water without fear. We knew your shield

would protect us on our journey across the sea. Once we

reached the boat where you were standing, you gave us

back our greatest treasure, our children.

You asked us God, once we reached the boat, to go to

Nineveh to put Intelligent Design in the textbooks in

Nineveh. Did you realize God that you were asking my

seven year old son to defend your very existence to the

greatest minds in the most prominent universities in

Nineveh? Did you realize God that you were asking my ten

year old son to defend your very existence to the nine

justices in the highest court in Nineveh? Did you realize

App. 20

God that you were asking my wife to defend your very

existence to the boards of directors of the most powerful

Corporations in Nineveh? Did you realize God that you

were asking me to bring together the African-American

and the European-American churches in rural Nineveh

knowing that this complete union was the only way to get

Intelligent Design into the textbooks in Nineveh?

Along the way to Nineveh you stopped the boat three days

before Palm Sunday. You told my family to walk across the

sea to the Holy Spirit on the shore. We kept our eyes on

you every step of the way for we knew if we faltered, we

would sink into the sea. Your Spirit told us to write a

simple message, “Please support Intelligent Design”. You

asked us to send this to the President of Nineveh which we

did for we knew he was strong in your spirit. You then

asked us to send the message to the Senators of our State

within Nineveh, which we did because we knew they were

strong in your spirit. You then asked us to send the mes-

sage to the Governor of the State within Nineveh that had

been ravaged with four hurricanes over a forty nine day

period the summer before, which we did because we knew

that, being the brother of the President of Nineveh the

Governor of this ravaged State was strong in the spirit.

Then God, you asked us to send the message to all of the

Senators and all of the Governors within Nineveh. Did you

forget God that there were those that would not be receptive

to this message? Did you not realize God that this was not a

message that those not strong in the spirit wanted to hear?

We put our faith in you God and did as you asked us to do.

As we started to walk back across the water to you in the

boat, did you realize God that the devil was in another

boat behind you trying to take our eyes off of you? The

devil went to great lengths to get our attention, for the

App. 21

devil knew that if we took our eyes off of you God for even

an instant, we would sink to the bottom of the sea. Did you

realize God in the deep fog of the morning, we could not

clearly see? Did you realize God that we needed confirma-

tion that we were walking to the right boat, for the view

was not clear? We wanted to do your work. We just wanted

to make sure the message was from you.

The morning of Palm Sunday, we worshiped in your house.

The room was strong in your spirit that morning. Your

overwhelming presence in the room overcame me when

you whispered in my ear that a storm was brewing on the

sea. That afternoon, we watched State Senators from the

ravaged State in Nineveh talk on the air waves, about a

starving woman in their State as if she had no soul, no

soul at all. These State Senators seemed to be claiming

that they had a better understanding of the existence of a

soul than you God. I then understood the storm that you

had enlightened me to earlier. The highest Senate in the

land of Nineveh was reported to have voted unanimously

to do everything they could to save the life of this starving

woman. Those in this highest Senate, both of the spirit,

and not of the spirit, voted unanimously. I recognized God

that this was a miracle possible only with your divine

intervention. Do you remember God that I jumped in my

truck and headed to the ravaged State to see if I could

help? I did it on faith God because I knew that your shield

would protect me from harm on this journey.

Your unanimous vote in the highest Senate in the land of

Nineveh was the confirmation that I needed to know that

we where headed to the right boat.

Amen

App. 22

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Richmond, Virginia

PLAINTIFF’S APPEAL

Prv24:11 If thou forbear to deliver them that are

drawn unto death, and those that are ready to be

slain;

Prv24:12 If thou sayest, Behold, we knew it not;

doth not he that pondereth the heart consider it?

and he that keepeth thy soul, doth not he know

it? and shall not he render to every man accord-

ing to his works?

Eze33:3 If when he seeth the sword come upon

the land, he blow the trumpet, and warn the peo-

ple;

Eze33:4 Then whosoever heareth the sound of

the trumpet, and taketh not warning; if the

sword come, and take him away, his blood shall

be upon his own head.

Eze33:5 He heard the sound of the trumpet, and

took not warning; his blood shall be upon him.

But he that taketh warning shall deliver his soul.

Eze33:6 But if the watchman see the sword

come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people

be not warned; if the sword come, and take any

person from among them, he is taken away in his

iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watch-

man’s hand.

Rom8:4 That the righteousness of the law might

be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh,

but after the Spirit.

App. 23

June 16, 2005

Mr. Alvin Reed

481 Lydia Perry Road

Sanford, North Carolina 27330

Dear Mr. Reed:

Thank you for writing to me about the use of the filibuster

for judicial nominations and the so-called “nuclear option.”

I appreciate hearing from you and am happy to respond.

As I am sure you are aware by now, a compromise was

struck between 14 senators, seven Democrats and seven

Republicans, to avoid taking action on the nuclear option

which I believe would have fundamentally harmed our

country and the Senate.

The substance of the compromise is that the seven

Democratic senators agreed to vote to end debate on three

of President Bush’s nominees, Priscilla Owen, Janice

Rogers Brown and William Pryor. Additionally, the seven

Republican senators agreed to vote against any effort to

change Senate precedent and force votes on judicial

nominations during the 109th Congress.

While I am pleased that a compromise was reached

which preserves the rights of the minority in the Senate, I

am disappointed that, as part of the compromise struck,

some judicial nominations will not be subject to the rules

and procedures provided for in the Senate.

Please know that I will continue to do my due dili-

gence when considering all judicial nominations, and I

evaluate each nominee based on their intellect, tempera-

ment, legal experience and their ability to demonstrate a

commitment to applying the law fairly and impartially.

App. 24

Again, thank you for writing. If you should have any

questions or additional comments, please do not hesitate

to contact my Washington, DC staff at (202) 224-3841.

Sincerely yours,

Dianne Feinstein

United States Senator

http://feinstein.senate.gov

Further information about my position on issues of con-

cern to California and the Nation are available at my

website http://feinstein.senate.gov. You can also receive

electronic e-mail updates by subscribing to my e-mail list

at http:/feinstein. senate. gov/issue. html.

22 May 1960 9.5 38.20 S 72.60 W SouthernChile 9,500

28 March 1964 9.2 61.10 147.50 W Southern 131

N Alaska, U.S.A.

9 March 1957 9.1 51.30 175.80 W Andreanof -

N Islands, U.S.A.

26 December 9.0 03.29 95.77 E Acehb- -

2004 N Andaman area 3,00,000

4 November 9.0 52.75 159.50 E Kamchatka, -

1952 N Russia

31 January 88 01.00 85.50 W Offthe coast 1,500

1906 N of Ecuador

28 March 2005 8.7 02.09 97.01 If Banyak 2,000

N Islands,

Indonesia

4February 8.7 51.30 178.60 W RatIslands, -

1965 N USA.

App. 25

15August 8.6 28.50 96.50 E IndoChina § 4,000+

1950 N Border region

16 December 8.6 36.60 105.32 E Ningxia- 2,00,000

1920 N Gansu, China

2005/05/21 23:01 M 5.6 NORTHERN SUMATRA,

INDONESIA z= 30km 5.39N 94.75E

2005/06/12 15:41 M 5.6 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

z= 14km 33.53N 116.57W

2005/06/15 02:50 M 7.0 OFF COAST OF NORTHERN

CALIFORNIA z= 10km 41.33N 125.86W

2005/06/15 06:27 M 4.6 OFF COAST OF NORTHERN

CALIFORNIA z= 10km 40.82N 126.49W

2005/06/15 07:14 M 4.6 OFF COAST OF NORTHERN

CALIFORNIA z= 10km 40.90N 126.39W

2005/06/16 20:53 M 5.3 GREATER LOS ANGELES

AREA, CA. z= 13km 34.06N 117.01W

2005/06/17 06:21 M 6.4 OFF COAST OF NORTHERN

CALIFORNIA z= 10km 40.72N 126.54W

2005/06/17 06:40 M 4.6 OFF COAST OF NORTHERN

CALIFORNIA z= 10km 40.96N 126.24W

2005/06/17 06:41 M 4.5 OFF COAST OF NORTHERN

CALIFORNIA z= 10km 40.86N 126.30W

2005/06/19 09:27 M 5.0 OFF COAST OF NORTHERN

CALIFORNIA z= 10km 40.32N 126.54W

8/13/04 — 9/30/04 FL hurricanes: Charlie, Frances,

Ivan, Jeanne

11/12/04 — Letter from Senator Dole about marriage

amendment

Sunday 12/26/04 — 4th largest earthquake

App. 26

3/14/05 — 3/15/05 — ID email to US Senators and Governors

Friday 3/18/05 — Start of execution by starvation -

Sunday 3/20/05 -— Palm Sunday, House, Senate, Whitehouse

vote on Terri Schiavo Leave for F!

Monday 3/21/05 — Arrive at hospice

Tuesday 3/22/05 ~ Senator Frist sends mail about

Intelligent Design

Wednesday 3/33/05 — Painted eyes

Thursday 3/24/05 - Donna, Jacob, and Jeremiah leave

for Hospice

Friday 3/28/05 — Donna, Jacob, and Jeremiah arrive in

Florida,

John ?:? Gideon Bible

Good Friday Jeremiah 8:13-9:15 pg 316

Sunday 3/27/05 — Easter

Monday 3/28/05 — 7th largest earthquake

Wednesday 3/30/05 — Terri Schiavo execution complete

Friday 4/01/05 — Pope dies, temperature April Fools

radio parody

4/11/05 — Letter from Governor of Kentucky about

Intelligent Design

5/02/05 — First trip to DC, 4 D C First 223

5/17/05 — Letter from Senator Burr about judicial

confirmations

6/14/05 — 6/17/05 Seven Earthquakes in CA

6/16/05 — Email from Senator Feinstein about judicial

confirmations

6/21/05 — Email from Jerry Spence

Friday 7/01/05 — Justice O’Connor retires

Sunday 7/03/05 — Teach Sunday school lessons on Shield

of God and significant of 39

Monday 7/04/05 — Fourth of July, Spirit of 76, from

Fourth Floor, Room 76

Category Four hurricane starts in ocean

App. 27

Tuesday 7/05/05 — Pray for Confirmation inside US

Supreme Court

Thursday 7/07/05 — Four bombs in London, England

subways

Saturday 7/09/05 — Rom 223

Sunday 7/10/05 — Judge John Roberts, 39 times in front of

US Supreme Court, nominated Saturday 7/30/05 — 2237 4

August 22, 2005

To: Robert A. Sar

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

2301 Sugar Bush Road, Suite 600

Raleigh, NC 27622

Re: Alvin R. Reed v. MCI, Inc.

Per our conversation today, my wife and I have determined

that two years salary is the make right we would accept to

drop all civil and criminal charges against MCI. This is

the time we estimate it will take to get our “ethical rating

system for businesses” off the ground, which will get us

back to where we would have been financially had I

continued to look the other way. I cannot go back to corpo-

rate America because of the confusion of whether or not to

obey the law, and the resulting situational anxiety that

this causes. As I pointed out in our conversation, statisti-

cally, virtually everyone is inadvertently using pirated

software. If an employee cannot object to the use of pirated

software without fear of retaliation, then I have no way of

knowing whether or not I am suppose to follow the words

of the executive management to obey the law or the

actions of executive management to look the other way. In

the case of MCI, I was repeatedly forced to use pirated

software against my will even though I repeatedly ob-

jected.

- App. 28

If it becomes necessary to take this all the way to the US

Supreme Court, we estimate that it would result in a

significantly higher total cost to MCI. We conclude this

because MCI responded to the EEOC charge by approving

my wrongful demotion, which is retaliation and by EEOC

rules significantly increases the penalties. This is age

discrimination because citizens over the age of forty have a

greater understanding of right and wrong because man’s

law and God’s law where more in synch a generation ago.

This makes it more likely that an employee over the age of

forty will listen to the public relations verbiage of execu-

tive management to obey the law which is what caused

MCI to retaliate against me in this case.

In our conversation, I indicated that I am being denied

disability because my medical doctor has indicated all

along that the issue is situational anxiety due to hostile

workplace. My medical doctor is well aware that the

hostile workplace is a direct result of my objections to

felonious activity at MCI. Righteousness is not considered

a disability by either Prudential Insurance or the US

Social Security Administration. A cure for righteousness is

not something I would accept as a resolution.

I explained to you why I am convinced that the US Su-

preme Court will rule in my favor. A felony is a felony is a

felony, whether it is to knowingly and with premeditation

disobey a bankruptcy court order such as occurred in this

situation, or pirated software which occurred in this

situation, or any other felony whose prison time is consis:

tent with pirated software. For example, if an employee is

forced to use a dozen pirated software programs, that

employee could spend five times twelve or sixty years in a

federal penitentiary even though he only committed the

felonies because he was under economic duress. I have

App. 29

been told that federal marshals come into a business with

loaded guns when doing a pirated software raid. For an

honest employee who does not have proof of ownership

readily available, even something as innocent as an

inadvertent sneeze at the wrong moment could trigger an

automated response from a federal marshal that the

employee’s widow would have to explain to their children.

This is, in part, the reason for my situational anxiety to

being forced to commit felonies under duress.

Alvin Reed

481 Lydia Perry Road

Sanford, NC 27330

(919) 774-1209

Alvin_R_Reed@yahoo.com

App. 31

1¢ eis . «

e* Fy BS a

* e

ie 7 4 i

4 - ”

oy 7 ' 4

len: ~~ ’ = oe ee = ‘

ose ‘bia, Be rs Sede a

+. ok

4); “Ne - Pn. Aa aA 4 ; PY.

“bee Ze’ ™ eee ae Le aes

. ppb ae | A ro. 4 vt

» as e2 OS eG i ee b? *

mn oe * cere ae i. 4 ™4

-t0~ tc. s ‘Sea's + YS

a ¢ Sy upite 628 ‘

wee pe -e a a a4 ¥e ‘

pi . 3

- Sa . -

-4 - pty fs

a of %..c « > eat ’

< ‘tat ces BS ’ J ; ‘ i.

~~, Sze 22 - "7d " a . “|

eT gs Se oat dog. BK

8 ds .

“- -_,.* ~

~ "4 6 °

ye aay tes 5 ‘. ep ty See

2005 Storms... ij Playback einai Katrina - Category 6

catrina hd) 4 «| >| ff} e ~ a SSI Tig all

Position: 25.7N, 87.7W

i aim WindSpeed: 160mph

App. 32

2 tyr epee

Y r ¢ bares

en an. os

a ‘

se pases ot Be Ee

whats a wes *

005 Storms... iy Playback Controls Rita - Category 5 ;

ey Nk) | IT) _ ue | Tenner

= - ae Position: 24.4N, 86.8W

~ Stower | Faster [~}

——= =

—— WindSpeed: 165mph

App. 33

s '

x a Pal

~ 16! =.

“

‘

GE | OR ety iat.

d pet Jad - pe . . ny Ss ent

° ° AFe . * ’ < i ?

: - ees ; . A : oe

PN FORE SET SEA it od De Cd ;

sy tnd ee ere, Se. 4 =% . + nde ceed a a ;

- HE ge oo Be a ae} Sg, et te lk

4 ° ar oe na r x iat

2005 Storms... \*) Playback Controls Wilma - Category

. : 1 Time: Wed Oct 19 2005, 6:38 P?

> tJ — Position: 17.9N, 83.9W

< Stower| _Faster I~ WodSpeed: 180mph

App. 34

August 2005

Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9 10 11 12 13

14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27

(1)28 (2)29 (3)30 (4)31

September 2005

Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa

(5)1 (6)2 (73

(8) 4 (9)5 (10) 6 (11) 7 (12) 8 (13) 9 (14)10

(15)11 (16)12 (17)13 (18)14 (19)15 (20)16 (21)17

(22)18 (23)19 (24)20 (25)21 (26)22 (27)23 (28)24

(29)25 (30)26 (31)27 (32)28 (33)29 (34)30

October 2005

Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa

(35) 1

(36) 2 (37) 3 (38) 4 (89) 5 (40) 6 (41) 7 (42) 8

(43) 9 (44)10 (45)11 (46)12 (47)13 (48)14 (49)15

(50)16 (51)17 (52)18 (53)19 20 21 22

23 24 25 26 27 28 29

30 31

And he went up unto them into the ship; and the wind

ceased: and they were sore amazed in themselves beyond

measure, and wondered. Mark 6:51

They have cut off my life in the dungeon, and cast a stone

upon me. Lamitations 3:53

For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but

the will of him that sent me.

John 6:38

App. 35

And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams,

five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this was the

offering of Elishama the son of Ammihud.

Numbers 7:53

ammihud (2190076:903:10) ammihud, stead, add, ere, lust,

what, hath, thee, base, the, .

elishama (1779244:630:14) elishama, shama, ham, con-

sent, sent, by, this, enan, eden, ride, tens, mene, air, ere,

ram (30931:2:7) faint, asia, oren, her, ami, noe, sia, goat

(444855:2:7) goat, dote, wrote, salt, write, on, salt, lamb

(2960354:2:9) hit, die, toah, ere, rode, lady, adar, tale,

goad, bush (7131:2:5) bush, road, salt, sat, seat, rosa

(7455:2:3) salt, sat, seat, mci (50003:2:10) do, note, lead,

tens, seat, adah, ohad, do, he, aher, 70453

Category 5 hurricane 3 times in 53 days

Num7:53 And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen,

five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this

was the offering of Elishama the son of Ammihud.

C:\Godswork\letters>w ammihud elishama ram _ goat

lamb bush rosa mci

ammihud (2190076:903:10) ammihud, stead, add, ere, lust,

what, hath, thee, base, the, elishama (1779244:630:14)

elishama, shama, ham, consent, sent, by, this, enan, eden,

ride, tens, mene, air, ere,

ram (30931:2:7) faint, asia, oren, her, ami, noe, sia,

goat (444855:2:7) goat, dote, wrote, salt, write, on, salt,

lamb (2960354:2:9) hit, die, toah, ere, rode, lady, adar, tale,

goad, bush (7131:2:5) bush, road, salt, sat, seat,

rosa (7455:2:3) salt, sat, seat

mci (50003:2:10) do, note, lead, tens, seat, adah, ohad, do,

he, aher, 70453

App. 36

And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and

between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head,

and thou shalt (b)r(u)i(s)e (h)is heel. Unto the woman he

said, I will greatly multiply thy so(r)r(o)w (a)n(d) thy

conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and

thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over

thee. And unto Adam he said, because thou hast heark-

ened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree,

of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of

it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in so(r)r(o)w (s)h(a)lt

thou eat of it all the days of thy life; Thorns also and

thistles (s)h(a)lQ@) i(t) bring forth to thee; and thou

(s)h(a)l(t) eat the herb of the field; In the sweat of thy face

shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for

out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust

shalt thou return. And Adam called his wife’s name Eve;

because (s)h(e) w(a)s (t)he mother of all living.

Genesis 3:15-20

C:\Godswork \letters>java find 4:6

0 4:6

Ge4:6 And the LORD said unto Cain, Why art thou wroth?

and why is thy countenance fallen?

Exo4:6 And the LORD said furthermore unto him, Put

now thine hand into thy bosom. And he put his hand into

his bosom: and when he took it out, behold, his hand was

leprous as snow.

App. 37

Lev4:6 And the priest shall dip his finger in the blood, and

sprinkle of the blood seven times before the LORD, before

the vail of the sanctuary.

Num4:6 And shall put thereon the covering of badgers’

skins, and shall spread over it a cloth wholly of blue, and

shall put in the staves thereof.

Deu4:6 Keep therefore and do them; for this is your wisdom

and your understanding in the sight of the nations, which

shall hear all these statutes, and say, Surely this great

nation is a wise and understanding people.

Josh4:6 That this may be a sign among you, that when

your children ask their fathers in time to come, saying,

What mean ye by these stones?

Jdgs4:6 And she sent and called Barak the son of Abinoam

out of Kedeshnaphtali, and said unto him, Hath not the

LORD God of Israel commanded, saying, Go and draw

toward mount Tabor, and take with thee ten thousand

men of the children of Naphtali and of the children of

Zebulun?

Ruth4:6 And the kinsman said, I cannot redeem it for

myself, lest I mar mine own inheritance: redeem thou my

right to thyself; for I cannot redeem it.

1Sm4:6 And when the Philistines heard the noise of the

shout, they said, What me aneth the noise of this great

shout in the camp of the Hebrews? And they understood

that the ark of the LORD was come into the camp.

2Sm4:6 And they came thither into the midst of the house,

as though they would have fetched wheat; and they smote

him under the fifth rib: and Rechab and Baanah his

brother escaped.

1Ki4:6 And Ahishar was over the household: and Adon-

iram the son of Abda was over the tribute.

2Ki4:6 And it came to pass, when the vessels were full,

that she said unto her son, Bring me yet a vessel. And he

said unto her, There is not a vessel more. And the oil

stayed.

1Chr4:6 And Naarah bare him Ahuzam, and Hepher, and

Temeni, and Haahashtari. These were the sons of Naarah.

App. 38

2Chr4:6 He made also ten lavers, and put five on the right

hand, and five on the left, to wash in them: such things as

they offered for the burnt offering they washed in them;

but the sea was for the priests to wash in.

Ezra4:6 And in the reign of Ahasuerus, in the beginning of

his reign, wrote they unto him an accusation against the

inhabitants of Judah and Jerusalem.

Neh4:6 So built we the wall; and all the wall was joined

together unto the half thereof: for the people had a mind to

work.

Est4:6 So Hatach went forth to Mordecai unto the street of

the city, which was before the king’s gate.

Job4:6 Is not this thy fear, thy confidence, thy hope, and

the uprightness of thy ways?

Psa4:6 There be many that say, Who will shew us any

good? LORD, lift thou up the light of thy countenance

upon us.

Prv4:6 Forsake her not, and she shall preserve thee: love

her, and she shall keep thee.

Eccl4:6 Better is an handful with quietness, than both the

hands full with travail and vexation of spirit.

SSol4:6 Until the day break, and the shadows flee away, I

will get me to the mountain of myrrh, and to the hill of

frankincense.

Isa4:6 And there shall be a tabernacle for a shadow in the

day time from the heat, and for a place of refuge, and for a

covert from storm and from rain.

Jer4:5 Set up the standard toward Zion: retire, stay not:

for I will bring evil from the north, and a great destruc-

tion.

Lam4:6 For the punishment of the iniquity of the daughter

of my people is greater than the punishment of the sin of

Sodom, that was overthrown as in a moment, and no

hands stayed on her.

Eze4:6 And when thou hast accomplished them, lie again

on thy right side, and thou shalt bear the iniquity of the

house of Judah forty days: I have appointed thee each day

for a year.

App. 39

Dan4:6 Therefore made I a decree to bring in all the wise

men of Babylon before me, that they might make known

unto me the interpretation of the dream.

Hos4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge:

because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject

thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast

forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.

Amos4:6 And I also have given you cleanness of teeth in all

your cities, and want of bread in all your places: yet have

ye not returned unto me, saith the LORD.

Jonah4:6 And the LORD God prepared a gourd, and made

it to come up over Jonah, that it might be a shadow over

his head, to deliver him from his grief. So Jonah was

exceeding glad of the gourd.

Mic4:6 In that day, saith the LORD, will I assemble her

that halteth, and I will gather her that is driven out, and

her that I have afflicted;

Zec4:6 Then he answered and spake unto me, saying, This

is the word of the LORD unto Zerubbabel, saying, Not by

might, nor by power, but by my spirit, saith the LORD of

hosts.

Mal4:6 And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the

children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest

I come and smite the earth with a curse.

Mat4:6 And saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast

thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels

charge concerning thee: and in their hands they shall bear

thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a

stone.

Mark4:6 But when the sun was up, it was scorched; and

because it had no root, it withered away.

Luke4:6 And the devil said unto him, All this power will I

give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto

me; and to whomsoever I will I give it.

App. 40

John4:6 Now Jacob’s well was there. Jesus therefore, being

wearied with his journey, sat thus on the well: and it was

about the sixth hour.

Acts4:6 And Annas the high priest, and Caiaphas, and

John, and Alexander, and as many as were of the kindred

of the high priest, were gathered together at Jerusalem.

Rom4:6 Even as David also describeth the blessedness of

the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without

works,

1Cor4:6 And these things, brethren, I have in a figure

transferred to myself and to Apollos for your sakes; that ye

might learn in us not to think of men above that which is

written, that no one of you be puffed up for one against

another.

2Cor4:6 For God, who commanded the light to shine out of

darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of

the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus

Christ

Gal4:6 And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the

Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father.

Eph4:6 One God and Father of all, who is above all, and

through all, and in you all.

Phi4:6 Be careful for nothing; but in every thing by prayer

and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be

made known unto God.

Col4:6 Let your speech be alway with grace, seasoned with

salt, that ye may know how ye ought to answer every man.

1Th4:6 That no man go beyond and defraud his brother in

any matter: because that the Lord is the avenger of all

such, as we also have forewarned you and testified.

1Tim4:6 If thou put the brethren in remembrance of these

things, thou shalt be a good minister of Jesus Christ,

nourished up in the words of faith and of good doctrine,

whereunto thou hast attained.

2Tim4:6 For I am now ready to be offered, and the time of

my departure is at hand.

App. 41

Heb4:6 Seeing therefore it remaineth that some must

enter therein, and they to whom it was first preached

entered not in because of unbelief:

Jas4:6 But he giveth more grace. Wherefore he saith, God

resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble.

1Pet4:6 For for this cause was the gospel preached also to

them that are dead, that they might be judged according

to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit

1Jn4:6 We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he

that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the

spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.

Rev4:6 And before the throne there was a sea of glass like

unto crystal: and in the midst of the throne, and round

about the throne, were four beasts full of eyes before and

behind.

count = 53

App. 30

August twenty eighth through October nineeth is 53 day span of category 5 for 3 burricanes.

JINGAM EDT 3)-auUG-2005 SSSPn EDT 28-SEP-2005

HISTORY of

KATRINA

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.