Opposition Brief — Indiana v. Ward
Supreme Court brief2005
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
\ Supreme Court. U.S.
\b Gi FILED
ae
fe JUN 1 0 2005
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
No. 04-1153
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
THE STATE OF INDIANA,
Petitioner,
ie
Roy LEE WARD,
Respondent.
On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the
Indiana Supreme Court
MOTION TO PROCEED JN FORMA PAUPERIS
The Respondent, ROY LEE WARD, by counsel, respectfully moves this Court
for leave to proceed Jn Forma Pauperis pursuant to Rule 39. In support of this
motion, counsel state that they were appointed to represent Mr. Ward in his direct
appeal to the Supreme Court of Indiana by the trial court, Spencer Circuit Court,
because he was indigent and without sufficient funds to retain an attorney and pay
fees for said action. Mr. Ward has been incarcerated since his arrest in this case and
- tees came eo
ee re se eee «
1 | of ket ES
has not been gainfully employed. He remains indigent as demonstrated in the
Affidavit attached hereto.
Respectfully submitted,
Lorinda(Meier oungcourt
Counsel of Record
P.O. Box 206
Huron, IN 47437-0206
(812) 849-9852
tv
REPORT ID: TFDRHRPT-30
Loc: ISP
OFFENDER NO: 914976
DATE
POSTED
06/03/2005
06/03/2005
06/03/2005
06/03/2005
06/01/2005
05/26/2005
05/26/2005
05/13/2005
05/13/2005
05/11/2005
05/06/2005
05/06/2005
05/06/2005
05/06/2005
05/06/2005
05/06/2005
05/05/2005
04/29/2005
Obese renee
4/28/2005
04/27/2008
04/27/2005
04/25/2005
04/22/2005
04/22/2005
04/15/2005
NO PENDING
ID
DOCUMENT
NUMBER
ISP 06/03
ISP 06/03
SHOP 54
ISP 05/26
ISP 05/26
ISP 05/13
ISP 05/13
R 90772
R 90510
ISP 05/06
ISP 05/06
ISP 05/06
ISP 05/06
ISP 05/06
POSTAGE
ISP 04/29
ISP 04/29
POSTAGE
R 89881
COMM CR
POSTAGE
ISP 04/22
ISP 04/22
R 86530
nee
xe
zee
nk
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
ALL TRANSACTION HISTORY REPORT
AS OF 12/06/2004
NAME: WARD, ROY L
TRAN DT
06/03/2005
06/03/2005
aS 1 02/2002
06/03/2005
06/01/2005
05/26/2005
05/26/2005
05/13/2005
05/13/2005
65/11/2005
05/06/2005
05/06/2005
05/06/2005
05/06/2005
05/06/2005
05/06/2005
05/05/2005
04/29/2005
04/29/2005
04/28/2005
04/27/2005
04/26/2005
04/25/2005
04/22/2005
04/22/2005
04/15/2005
AMOUNT ON HOLD
CURRENT BALANCE..........
PENDING BALANCE..........
END OF REPORT TFDRHRPT-30
THRU
TYP CODE
9
9
3
AGVONAVVOVOVVNVNNANVVVONVUYD
:
Fie ee as eS
DATE ht Ui
TIME 09:02:
06/06/2005 PAGE 1
ADDITIONAL
AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
$49.07 ISP-060305-01421 /
7.61 ISP-060305-01402 /
$23.67 ISP-060305-00640 /
$5.35 ISP-060305-00628 /
$15.20
$53.61 ISP-052605-00306 /
$9.13 ISP-052605-00285 /
$96.50 ISP-051305-00421 /
$6.88 ISP-051305-00397 /
$120.06 VIRGINIA WARD
i$.20 MCC
49.28 ISP-050605-01063 /
18.88 ISP-v50605-01046 /
20.70 ISP-050605-00699 /
42.09 ISP-050605-00693 /
arcs ISP-050605-00683 /
5 ae ISP-042905-00443 /
19.46 ISP-042905-00423 /
$6.05
$275.00 KIMBERLY WARD
a3 ISP-042205-00041/REFU
-4
ER ISP-042205-00041 /
17.78 ISP-042205-00015 /
$651.56 MCC
$582.86
$0.00
$582.86
$0.00
No. 04-1153
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
—
THE STATE OF INDIANA,
Petitioner,
b
Roy LEE WARD,
Respondent.
On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the
Indiana Supreme Court
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
I swear or affirm under penalty of perjury that, because of my poverty, I cannot
prepay the docket fees or pay the publishing expenses to oppose the State of Indiana’s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Indiana Supreme Court. I believe that I am
entitled to have this Court deny Indiana’s Petition. I swear or affirm under penalty
of perjury under United States laws that my answers on this form are true and correct.
(28 U.S.C. § 1746; 18 U.S.C. § 1621.)
6-3-9 Log Ke Fe
Dated Roy Lee Ward
Page | of 4
1. For both you and your spouse estimate the average amount of money received
from each of the following sources during the past 12 months. Adjust any
amount that was received weekly, biweekly, quarterly, semiannually, or
annually to show the monthly rate. Use gross amounts, that is amounts before
any deductions for taxes or otherwise.
I have no regular source of income. My mother occasionally sends me small sums
of money which I use for commissary items such as snacks, and medical and dental expenses.
2. List your employment history for the past two (2) years, most recent employer first. (Gross
monthly pay is before taxes or other deductions.)
I have been incarcerated on death row of the Indiana Department of Corrections
for the last two (2) years.
3. List your spouse's employment history for the past two years, most recent employer first.
(Gross monthly pay is before taxes or other deductions.)
I am unmarried.
4. How much cash do you and your spouse have? $ S82. 6 . Below, state any
money you or your spouse have in bank accounts or in any other financial institution.
Financial Institution Type of Account Amount you have Amount your spouse has
$
$
If you are a prisoner seeking to appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding, you
must attach a statement certified by the appropriate officer showing all receipts,
expenditures, and balances during the last six months in your institutional accounts. If
you have multiple accounts, perhaps because you have been in multiple institutions,
attach one certified statement of each account.
Page 2 of 4
10.
11.
12.
List the assets, and their values, which you own or your spouse owns. Do not list
clothing and ordinary household furnishings.
] own no property except my personal clothing and the few items of personal
property allowed by the Indiana Department of Corrections.
State every person, business, or organization owing you or your spouse money, and the
amount owed.
I am owned no money by any person, business or organization.
State the persons who rely on you or your spouse for support.
No one relies upon me for support.
Estimate the average monthly expenses of you and your family. Show separately the
amounts paid by your spouse. Adjust any payments that are made weekly, biweekly,
semiannually, or annually to show the monthly rate.
I have no monthly expenses. I occasionally receive small sums of money from my
mother which I spend on food in commissary, medical and dental treatment.
Do you expect any major changes to your monthly income or assets or liabilities during
the next 12 months? (Yes / No
Have you paid — or will you be paying — an attorney any money for services in connection
with this case including the completion of this form. Yes /No
Have you paid — or will you be paying — anyone other than an attorney (such as
paralegal or typist) any money for services in connection with this case, including the
completion of this form? OYes “No
Provide any other information that will help explain why you cannot pay the docket fees
for your appeal.
None
Page 3 of 4
13.
State the add~ess of your legal residence.
Roy Lee Ward #914976
Indiana State Prison
P.O. Box 41
Michigan City, IN 46361
Your age: 2 Ps
Your years of schooling: CG a ; D
Your social security number: aj {2-oO27* b4 re Ps 6
Page 4 of 4
No. 04-1153
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
THE STATE OF INDIANA,
Petitioner.
Roy Lee WARD,
Respondent.
On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the
Indiana Supreme Court
RESPONDENT'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION
LORINDA MEIER YOUNGCOURT STEVEN E. RIPSTRA
Counse! of Record RIPSTRA LAW OFFICE
Post OFFICE Box 206 4185S. MAIN St.
HURON, IN 47437-0206 P.O. BOX 767
(812) 849-9852
JASPER. IN 47547-0767
(812) 482-6414
Counsel for Respondent
STATEMENT
I. The underlying facts
Ward moved for a Change of Venue from Spencer County, or to Draw Residents from
Another County [App.' vol 8, p. 1835; vol. 9, p. 2029}. The motion was heard pre-trial (Tr.’
5/30/02, pp. 6-46]. Prior to jury selection, Ward renewed the motion and it was denied [Tr.
10/7/02, p. 4]. Ward exhausted all of his peremptory challenges [Tr. vol. VI, pp. 950-51; vol.
VII, p. 1038]. He renewed the venue motion at the conclusion of jury selection, which was again
denied [Tr. vol. VIII, pp. 1058, 1060].
Ward disagrees with the State of Indiana’s recitation of underlying facts on page four of
the Petition for Writ of Certiorari. The evidence presented at trial was that all the vaginal and
oral swabs taken from Payne were negative for sperm and seminal fluids [Tr. vol. XII, pp. 1774-
75}. Ward’s DNA was not found on any “rape kit” samples taken from Payne’s body [Tr. vol.
XII, pp. 1779-83].
' The abbreviation “App.” refers to the Appendix to the Brief of Appellant filed with the
Indiana Supreme Court and is part of the record herein.
*The abbreviation “Tr.” refers to the Transcript (by date or volume number) that was filed
by the Spencer Circuit Court Reporter with the Indiana Supreme Court and is part of the record
herein.
REASONS TO DENY THE PETITION
I
The Indiana Supreme Court correctly found that Ward had not
received a fair trial and that the trial court erred in not granting
a change of venue.
A. Ward objected at every opportunity to the bias and prejudice of the Spencer County
venue and jury.
The State of Indiana asserts that “Ward was first heard to object to the impartiality of his
jury on appeal following his conviction and sentence.” [Petition for Writ of Certiorari, p. 5).
According to Indiana, because there was no objection, Beck v. Washington, 369 U.S. 541, 557-58
(1962) bars Ward relief.
Indiana's assertion that Ward failed to object is flatly untrue. The Indiana Supreme Court
would have refused to hear the issue had it been waived in the trial court. Brown v. Indiana, 783
N.E.2d 1121, 1126 (Ind. 2003). On five occasions and at all stages of his trial Ward objected to
being tried in Spencer County, Indiana and questioned the venue’s impartiality. Months prior to
trial Ward filed a Verified Motion for Change of Venue from the County or, in the Alternative, to
Draw the Jury from Residents of Another County [App. v.8, p.1835]. The motion was based on
the “vicious and lurid nature” of the crime, expressed public outrage, news coverage and public
knowledge, or speculation, of Ward’s background. These conditions, Ward asserted, were
“continuing and pervasive” in Spencer county and its adjoining counties [App. v.8, pp. 1836].
After the trial court denied Ward further discovery for the venue hearing Ward withdrew the
motion.
tv
Ward re-filed an identical Motion for Change of Venue a few weeks later, but still
months before trial [App. v. 8, p. 2029]. Ward orally renewed the motion the first day of trial
(Tr. vol. 1, pp. 3-4]. During jury selection, after exhausting all of his peremptory challenges,
Ward’s request for additional challenges was denied [Tr. vol. VI, pp. 950-51; vol. VII, pp. 1038-
40]. Prior to evidence being presented, Ward orally renewed his request for a change of venue
[Tr. vol. VII], pp. 1058-60] and he renewed the motion at the conclusion of all the evidence in
the Guilt Phase. [Tr. vol. XIII, pp. 1983-85].
B. Beck v. Washington Does Not Make Irvin v. Dowd Inapplicable to Ward’s Case
Indiana argues that the Indiana Supreme Court read /rvin v. Dowd “in isolation” without
also looking to Beck v. Washington which “clarified” /rvin [Petition for Writ of Certiorari, p. 7].
Irrespective of its various divisions and subdivisions, Indiana’s argument is that Ward must
prove, but cannot, that the jurors seated at his trial were biased, prejudiced and incapable of
returning an impartial verdict. According to Indiana, the overall community sentiment from
which the seated jurors were drawn is of no import. Indiana cites to Beck v. Washington as
authority. This argument is without merit.
In Beck v. Washington, this Court compared Beck’s claim to that in /rvin v. Dowd,
finding that in Irvin’s case,
[SJensational publicity adverse to the accused permeated the small
town in which he was tried, the voir dire examination indicated
that 90% of 370 prospective jurors and two-thirds of those seated
on the jury had an opinion as to guilt, and the accused
unsuccessfully challenged for cause several persons accepted on
the jury. The fact that [Beck] did not challenge for cause any of the
jurors so selected is strong evidence that he was convinced the
jurors were not biased and had not formed any opinions as to his
guilt.
ive
Il
The Indiana Supreme Court correctly followed the precedent of
Irvin v. Dowd in finding Ward did not receive a fair trial.
Indiana next argues that the Indiana Supreme Court significantly departed from this
Court’s precedent when it found Ward had not been afforded an impartial jury. This argument is
also without merit. The Indiana Supreme Court wrote a well researched and reasoned opinion
which cited to numerous juror quotes found in the trial record.
The Indiana Supreme Court unanimously reversed Ward's conviction based upon “a
showing of a general atmosphere of prejudice throughout the community” [Petition for Writ of
Certiorari, App. p. 12a]. The supreme court found there was overwhelming evidence of
community bias and that the passions stirred by the young girl’s brutal murder had not calmed
nor cooled. Based on these findings, the supreme court found that Ward had been denied a fair
and impartial trial.
The supreme court analyzed in detail the extensive evidence relevant to the jury pool’s
knowledge, opinions and attitudes [Petition for Writ of Certiorari, App. pp. 4a-9a]. The supreme
court found that juror “questionnaires revealed the pervasive nature of the pretrial publicity, the
extent of the community’s knowledge about this case, and its understandable outrage.” [Petition
for Writ of Certiorari, App. p. 5a]. As stated by a venire inember, “unless you live under a rock
you have heard a lot about this case . . . everyone was talking about it - you couldn’t go
anywhere!” [Petition for Writ of Certiorari, App. p. Sa].
As in /rvin, the Indiana Supreme Court did not find that individual jurors were necessarily
biased, nor media coverage decisive, but that “the critical inquiry is whether overall community
bias and prejudice exist such that Ward was denied a fair trial.” [Petition for Writ of Certiorari,
App. p. lla]. Throughout the proceedings, Ward consistently referred not only to media
coverage, but conversation and dissemination of information within the small community and
county.
Relying upon state court precedent, the supreme court noted a “presumption that juror’s
voir dire is truthful.” Brown v. State, 563 N.E.2d 103, 105 (Ind. 1990). However, relying upon
Murphy v. Florida, 421 U.S. 794 (1975), found that the presumption could be overcome.
Indiana mentions Murphy v. Florida, 421 U.S. 794 (1975), a case which post dates both
Irvin and Beck only in passing. In Murphy, this Court stated,
In » community where most veniremen will admit to a
dis ,ualifying prejudice, the reliability of the others’ protestations
may be drawn into question; for it is then more probable that they
are part of a community deeply hostile to the accused, and more
likely that they may unwittingly have been influenced by it.
Id. at 803.
Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717 (1961) and the instant case are factually strikingly similar.
Most jury pool members said they could set aside any preconceived opinion of guilt. Yet, the
prevailing community sentiment indicated a build-up of prejudice. The trial was a cause celebre
in the “small community-so much so that curbstone opinions, not only as to . . . guilt but even as
to what punishment he should receive, were solicited and recorded on the public streets...” News
accounts contained details of the crime and of Ward’s criminal history. In short, the prospective
juror’s were from a small community, asked to decide a high profile murder cases, while
passions were still running high over the crimes. /d. at 724-28.
Ward’s case, as in /rvin, involved a murder conviction and a death sentence. /d. at 718.
Even though the /rvin trial court may have denied the defendant’s three motions for change of
venue and eight motions to continue the trial, based upon an interpretation of the controlling
Indiana statute at the time, /d. at 720, the /rvin Court considered the case upon prevailing Indiana
precedent. In the face of the statute, “the Indiana Supreme Court held that if it was “made to
appear after attempt has actually been made to secure an impartial jury that such jury could not
be obtained in the county of present venue...it becomes the duty of the judiciary to provide to
every accused a public trial by an impartial jury, even though to do so the court must grant a
second change of venue and thus contravene [the statute] . . .”” /d. at 721, quoting State ex rel.
Gannon vs. Porter Circuit Court, 239 Ind. 637, 642, 159 N.E.2d 713, 715 (1959). Irvin was
decided simply upon the merits of the defendant’s ability to obtain a fair trial in the county to
which the case was venued. The fact that the trial court may have felt prohibited from granting
the second change does not appear to effect the court’s analysis in such a way that it makes the
case inapplicable to Ward’s. This Court judged tie veracity of juror’s responses against the
template of the circumstances surrounding the trial. /rvin, 366 US.at 727-28.
In Ward's case, a hostile community environment existed and was evidenced outside the
courtroom. On August 30, 2002, a little more than a month before the trial was scheduled to
begin, te judge forcefully and sternly admonished those in the courtroom over an incident that
occurred earlier in the day. As Ward was being escorted into the courthouse there were shouts
and the judge thought some people had to be restrained [Tr.8/30/02, p. 38]. Only 38 days later the
parties would try to pick a fair and unbiased jury to decide Ward's fate: whether he lived or died.
The Indiana Supreme Court correctly held that, “With his life at stake, . .. the
Constitution requires that the defendant ‘be tried in an atmosphere undisturbed by so huge a
wave of public passion and by a jury other than one in which [one half] of the members admit,
before hearing any testimony, to possessing a belief in his guilt.’” [Petition for Writ of Certiorari,
p. 12a].
CONCLUSIGN
The petition for writ of certiorari should be denied.
Respectfully submitted,
Yfoeecupubt
init gins Y dingcourt
Counsél of Record
Steven E. Ripstra , f,
June 10, 2005
' Lorinda Meier Youngcourt, Attorney at Law
Post Office Box 206 % Huron, Indiana 47437-0206
Phone 812-849-9852 % Fax 812-849-1294
Sent by Federal Express
June 10, 2005
William 1 .. Suter, Clerk
Supreme Court of United States
One 1st St NE
Washington, D.C. 20543
Re: _—_ State of Indiana v. Roy Lee Ward; 04-1153
Dear Mr. Suter:
Enclosed you will find an original and eleven (11) copies of Roy Lee Ward’s
Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Brief in Opposition to the State of Indiana’s Petition
for Writ of Certiorari to the Indiana Supreme Court, and Proof of Service for filing in the
above referenced cause.
You will also find enclosed a self-addressed stamped for your ease in returning a
file stamped copy of the motion to me for my file. Thank you for your time and
cooperation in this matter.
No. 04-1153
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
THE STATE OF INDIANA,
Petitioner,
V.
Roy LEE WARD,
Respondent.
On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the
Indiana Supreme Court
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, Lorinda Meier Youngcourt, do swear or declare that on this date, June 10, 2005, as
required by Supreme Court Rule 29, I have served the enclosed MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and RESPONDENT’S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION on each
party to the above proceeding or that party’s counsel, and on every other person required to be
served, by depositing an envelope containing the above documents in the United States mai!
properly addressed to each of them and with first-class postage prepaid, or by delivery to a third-
party commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days.
The names and addresses of those served are as follows:
Steve Carter, Stephen R. Creason, and James B. Martin, Office of the Attorney
General, Indiana Government Center South, Fifth Floor, 302 W Washington
Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on June 10, 2005.
Lyegunrs-
Lorindd Meier Youb&court
ORIGINAL dln
No. OD 5- a> >.
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATE®
: -
DAV IP “Dc Cualielm o, Je einderdec 4
—PETITIONER = / ri
(Your erm) (
VS
Lures DRING A RESPONDEN1 (3)
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAl\I ot! ag
Spynse
The petitioner asks leave to file the attached pots 2 writ of certiorari
without prepayment of costs and to proceed in forma pauperis.
[ ] Petitioner has previously been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis
in the following court(s):
My Petitioner has not previously been granted leave to proceed in forma
pauperis in any other court.
Petitioner’s affidavit or declaration in support of this motion is atta thed hereto.
» lie Fan (Ga !
(Sic nature)
AFFIDAVIT OR DECLARATION
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED JN FiXRMA PAUPERIS
I, Tis Da MS. on, am tnd SE in the above-en‘itled case. In support of
my motion to proceed in forma pauperis, I state that because of ray pc verty I am unable to pay
the costs of this case or to give security therefor; and I believe I am extitled to redress.
1. For both you and your spouse estimate the average amount of money received from each of
the following sources during the past 12 months. Adjust amy ariount that was received
weekly, biweekly, quarterly, semiannually, or annually to show’the :aonthly rate. Use gross
amounts, that is, amounts before any deductions for taxes or otmerw se.
income source Average monthly amount during Amourit expected
the past 12 months ner? tronth
You . Spouse You Spouse
Employment $A) vA'% $ p01? : On @ $ LON
: 4
Self-employment gi! i/ $ u | vy su g Ni /
Income from real property ¢ 5 ge Sa Ge WEY. $._\U w Sai t/
(such as rental income)
interest and dividends $_u | Tee Ot Z gUlU ¢ lu
Gifts $_U if: > * | L/ $4) | // g Nii
Alimony tdi. et Y. EMAL eC oh
Child Support $V Yee OG Agee a Pe, ¢ il liv
Retirement (such as social $_ Ul // ns ee 2! eee ee ee
security, pensions, ‘ some
annuities, insurance)
Disability (such as social s\\ i/ gift t/ gi“ og WU IY
security, insurance payments) \ | .
Unemployment payments gs Ul] YY gill $f // ¢_\l | f
Public-assistance $ u| Ae OE ee
Other (specify): 4 Nt ¢ Ki l/ $ i) t/ g MY ¢ ili Il
(such as welfare) |
Total monthly income: $
2. List your employment history for the past two years, most recent :irst. (Gross monthly pay
is before taxes or other deductions.)
Employer Address Dates of Gross monthly pay
see ; Employment .
Pow 2 ASON VU POOW 2 A $ y ers) & tm ™
.. | $ j
Bs | DS $ L
8. List your spouse’s employment history for the past two years, most recent employer first.
(Gross monthly pay is before taxes or other deductions.)
Employer Address Dates of Gross monthly pay
Employment
PON 1 UN % paystera 5 DONS
| $ ae
| oe
4, How much cash do you and your spouse have? $__—_ 4/2?“
Below, state any money you or your spouse have in bank accoun:: or in any other financial
institution.
Financial institution Type of.account Amount you have Anount your spo
WOK ype 5 m4 ¢ yo ;ount your spouse has
b LON 7 $ pon’
| $ peer
: $ | Rauch
5. List the assets, and their values, which you own or your spouse «vns. Do not list clothing
and ordinary household furnishings.
C) Home Soe CJ Other real estate
Value A’VAlT Value HOW &
(C) Motor Vehicle #1 iy i% [ Motor Vehicle: #2
Year, make & mode]__*’' > Year, make & model WOW
Value VON
Value WON %
C Other assets obs ae
Description - yp OF
Value VDL
6. State every person, business, or organization owing you or you spouse money, and the
amount owed.
Person owing you or Amount owed to you Amou 1t owed to your spouse
your spouse money :
VDOT $ yw OVW te S$ WsOw x2
a \ | / $ A / / > \ / /
eee $ ese? $ ha eg
7. State the persons who rely on you or your spouse for support.
Name Relationship Age
0% JUOW & KOK
NT] l/ \{ cf \l i /
rn t/ I (/ ss cs L/
8. Estimate the average monthly expenses of you and your family. Sh:iw separately the amounts
paid by your spouse. Adjust any payments that are made weelly, biweekly, quarterly, or
annually to show the monthly rate.
You Your spouse
Rent or home-mortgage payment :
(include lot rented for mobile home) Nt § KDE
Are rea] estate taxes included? OYes [No
Is property insurance included? Yes (No
Utilities (electricity, heating fuel,
water, sewer, and telephone) $ MY =—s gg Hy’
Home maintenance (ropairs and upkeep) Spee AO
Food g AOnv4. ~~ AJORS
Clothing g VIX ee a
Laundry and dry-cleaning $ MMe A “ = "ae RL OWS
Medical and dental expenses $ fw L re ae WONS
You
Transportation (not including motor vehicle payments) MIVA
Recreation, entertainment, newspapers, magazines, ete. $ U0 mw
Insurance (not deducted from wages or included in mortgage payment ;)
Homeowner’s or renter's $ VEY
Life SIS _
Health g AOA
Motor Vehicle g Von Gq
Other: __ 00)“ $_ Wp %
Taxes (not deducted from wages or included in mortgage payments)
(specify. Ab 4 ¢ Vone
Installment payments |
Motor Vehicle S$ AoW tt
Credit card(s) $2)"
Department store(s) $HORT
Other: § LOA 4 $ Aswr
Alimony, maintenance, and support paid to others g¢$ VIeQ
Regular expenses for operation of business, profession, y
or farm (attach detailed statement) s_/Vo nw"
Other (specify): Wb w4 s_Aen 4
Total monthly expenses: gon
9. Do you expect any major changes to your monthly income or expe:ises or in your assets or
liabilities during the next 12 months?
C2 Yes No If yes, describe on an attached sheet.
10. Have you paid - or will you be paying — an attorney any money fo: services in connection
with this case, including the completion of this form? ( Yes )
If yes, how much?
If yes, state the attorney's name, address, and telephone number:
11. Have you paid—or will you be paying—anyone other than an attorr ey (such as a paralegal or
a typist) any money for services in connection with this case, includ ‘ng the completion of this
form?
0 Yes No
If yes, how much?
If yes, state the person’s name, address, and telephone number:
12. Provide any other information that will help explain why you cannoli pay the costs of this case.
5 have beew wc arceratoad for The
TwesTy ~yfars P Bs have Md INC
me ish ot ry) BT pir! &e fp: Sy,
OMe War Aw ae
I declare under penalty of per} foregoing is true and correct
Executed on: 3 GS 1S . 2005
/
x Li vy, > Aut fiSC
( ignature)
NO. 05-25
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
DAVID DiGUGLIELMO; THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF
THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA; THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF
PENNSYLVANIA,
Petitioners,
CURTIS BRINSON,
Respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
NORRIS E. GELMAN, ESQUIRE
ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT BRINSON
THE PUBLIC LEDGER BUILDING
620 CHESTNUT STREET
SUITE 940
PHILADELPHIA, PA. 19106
215 - 574-0513
ATTORNEY ID # 14223
WN <p .
a ORIGINAL sm |
No, _2 Ea 2.
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATE!
—PETITIONER
VS.
LURES TINS 0 RESPONDEN1(
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAI!PERIS
Spon se
The petitioner asks leave to file the FOE a ca 4, writ of certiorari
without prepayment of costs and to proceed in forma pauperis,
[ ] Petitioner has previously been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis
in the following court(s):
asi
>
f/f
[ ] Petitioner has not previously been granted leave to proceed in forma
pauperis in any other court.
Petitioner’s affidavit or declaration in support of this motion is atta shed hereto.
a #2 \
(Siz nature)
AFFIDAVIT OR DECLARATION
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED !N Fi0XRMA PAUPERIS
3 Luc RTS DRinSo, am ne in the above-eniitled case. In support of
my motion to proceed in forma pauperis, I state that because of ray px verty I am unable to pay
the costs of this case or to give security therefor; and I believe I am extitled to redress.
1. For both you and your spouse estimate the average amount of money received from each of
the following sources during the past 12 months. Adjust any sraount that was received
weekly, biweekly, quarterly, semiannually, or annually to show the :nonthly rate. Use gross
amounts, that is, amounts before any deductions for taxes or otherw se.
income source Average monthly amount during Amoui it expected
the past 12 months next tronth
You . Spouse You Spouse
Employment sie gHOnt ¢ DORKS ¢5 DON
Self-employment alten 20 Fite guts os U $ | U/
Income from real property Satis ORE demas Ge" 2 BF, $ Uy $ Aw
(such as rental income)
interest and dividends $_u Fie eS Sarr eee eo cs ( U
Gitts Sul if guj i a He eT Seige SSS. 2 DE
Alimony Ct a ge a ge A ei
Child Support ae ee eee 5 ee eee en ory See com ee
Retirement (such as social g Uf $ 4 l/ ¢_ Ny / g Hl diy
security, pensions,
annuities, insurance)
Disability (such as social
security, insurance payments)
Unemployment payments
Public-assistance
(such as welfare)
Other (specify): __ !OU AV r
hey Lt} é i
Total monthly income: § u| So ey Th wt g tl \ii
2. List your employment history for the past two years, most recent ‘irst. (Gross monthly pay
is before taxes or other deductions.)
Employer Address Dates of Gross monthly pay
. Employment
302 AIOW LT MOCk) 2 g ROO
| $ i i
Ls 3 ie ee
8. List your spouse’s employment history for the past two years, rmost recent employer first.
(Gross monthly pay is before taxes or other deductions.)
Employer Address Dates of Gross monthly pay
) Employment
pond wn) Done, g LONG
| \ s__|
s \ Ricak
4, How much cash do you and your spouse have? $__ 4/2“
Below, state any money you or your spouse have in bank account: or in any other financial
institution.
Financial institution Type of account Amount you have Ariount your spouse has
WIA ‘Ll NOD $ MOOR i! $. riya @ 4
| Seat Be acd
Z | _ aa ea
5. List the assets, and their values, which you own or your spouse «ryns. Do not list clothing
and ordinary household furnishings.
DC Home Cl Other real estate —
Value Ua} 7 Value #9 OY
CO) Motor Vehicle #1 re ZC Motor Vehicle #2
Year, make & model i Year, make & model WOW
Value VOW 2 Value Won
() Other assets : a
Description WOW %
Value HOA
6. State every person, business, or organization owing you or yow' spouse money, and the
amount owed.
Person owing you or Amount owed to you Amau it owed to your spouse
your spouse money
DONT $ Wow & $_ B/C S
\\ | / $ Mt Fy $ \ / m4
LL // $ Al fy $ \l L/
7. State the persons who rely on you or your spouse for support.
Name Relationship Age
oI JUON & sh Ae See
uf 1/ \{ (/ oe \l i/
(\ 1/ \{ co DEUS, LL
8. Estimate the average monthly expenses of you and your family. Sh:iw separately the amounts
paid by your spouse. Adjust any payments that are made weekly, biweekly, quarterly, or
annually to show the monthly rate.
You Your spouse
Rent or home-mortgage payment
(include lot rented for mobile home) ge VYOYN2 #£¢ adne
Are real estate taxes included? OYes [No
Is property insurance included? O)Yes (No
Utilities @lectricity, heating fuel, | eur
water, sewer, and telephone) S Mowe ¢ VdY <
Home maintenance (repairs and upkeep) QADw lt = --@ pon ?
Food gs 044 8 g W0NS
Clothing g ve * :: wee Sees Is 8
Laundry and dry-cleaning g Aen 4 ¢$_ NO}o
Medical and dental expenses ¢ Ain % a
You Your spouse
Transportation (not including motor vehicle payments) $_A0% g_ VON %
Recreation, entertzinment, newspapers, magazines, ett. $00 ni $ NIWA
Insurance (not deducted from wages or included in mor ze payments)
Homeowner’s or renter’s 6 Vb g_ bON4
Life g dws g FONG
Health $_L0OW] -g_ NOUS
Motor Vehicle $ Add g GI
Other: _ 00 »'% tins ~ NON*
Taxes (not deducted from wages or included in mortgage payments)
(specify): Ab 24 ¢ Vine $ NIN
Installment payments
Motor Vehicle $ Won td g Hi AA
Credit card(s) $ UWS s NOK
Department store(s) ¢ Vbnp2 ¢ NIA
Other: WOA4 gs posed ¢ Ins
Alimony, maintenance, and support paid to others g¢ VIN $__ 0 4
Regular expenses for operation of business, profession,
or farm (attach detailed statement) ¢ ont ¢ ON4
Other (specify): WbN4 gs A2n4 g Nop
Total monthly expenses: ¢ VOWD gg NON”
9, Do you expect any major changes to your monthly income or expa@:ises or in your assets or
liabilities during the next 12 months?
CO Yes No If yes, describe on an attached sheet.
10. Have you paid - or will you be paying - an attorney any money for services in connection
with this case, including the completion of this form? Yes [S{No
If yes, how much?
If yes, state the attorney’s name, address, and telephone number:
11. Have you paid—or will you be paying—anyone other than an attorney (such as a paralegal or
a typist) any money for services in connection with this case, iclid:ng the completion of this
form?
O Yes WNo
If yes, how much?
If yes, state the person’s name, address, and telephone number:
12. Provide any other information that will help explain why you cannot pay the costs of this case.
Jt have brew ivoar ceratoal “fy The par!
FweiTy “yrars, a have Nd INCE2ML War ny
Means ot DO. 49 ht AE? = Ov >
I declare under penalty of} OEE that the foregoing is true and correct.
Exeetad on: _3/ A oe
(Lae Arua WC
(Signature)
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.