Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Shlishey the Best, Inc. v. Option One Mortgage Corp.

Supreme Court |}

ae wa BO

Florida Bar Re: Amend. to Rul

Jud. Admin. Rule 2.050 (Time Star

193 So.2d 423 (Fla. 1986) (Ehrlicl

ry ,OrTPrreprecr ly

4 : |

~. ‘

T ae | y t

VAL ft A i

7 ‘

i 1¢ A Tt

»

IS & NET oa | (

T }

} > » QE +

: ? | >

ior t ¢ >

> ( |

= } 45 CT

ia I iJ T)

‘ 1 s

{ ++ ; 2) ? rm

‘ LLL@ I i Pit ‘ i ‘

‘ } } ‘ »ON " OO |

:

j . ‘

Ney lads |

—~ i. ORG (I

GB &, rt {Hl

} ™ |

LICharaGasO! \ ( I

R ‘ }

Vianhattan Bank

U.S. v. Jame

Real Property

T @ 4210

AIO US

z

In The

SUPREME COURT OF THE!

Shi

for a writ of certiorar}

Second District Court

per curiam, the orde}

Judicial Circuit, &

ine Up!

Appeal of Florida (App

Circuit Court of the

: ment f ‘

\] r timel | t i rid) i | | [ |

CFict ¢ ! Ol appeal ¢ ered raer ienv!}

he i} lyecembe? (pit) LAD] | ]

florida law, the “Per Curia \ffirmed’ de )

raer denying rehneal p iy not! ppt ed

I Orjaa Oupi ne TWourt I d ret DPpCa I

powel R. J. Reynold 'obacco (

Qe} gq US (| } ZOOA) he wy) dict

his d

PrIFICATION OF POSSIBLE APP!

OF 28 U.S.C . §2403(b)

INSTITUTIONAL AND STATI

PROVISIONS INVOLVED

\.mendament Criminal!

concerning nro

ymmpensati

Amendment AIlV

f law — Equal protecti

}

ri!

q+fror tn 4) Nerrty ri ) ) }

r |

‘ umed L( a1 ulitie L COl ide} } ror

} Dp ri } rvé lect | | ( Beat !

r ape LT } qd tf | ) é

rtitt iL | | ¢ Ot L] [ I

rey Tre objecti nal I ‘ '

! ice | nec | | ( 1 ) I

t alfect loud pul

nne rc ;

igment |

1eTicie)

lorida Rules o

Mistakes; Inadvertence; Excusable Nep

wiv Discovered Evidence; Fraud; etc. © mot

}

‘ } ‘ , ‘ ‘+ 3

" ma Upof? i¢ erm a re IS] ‘

i p) rt | i¢ ' ‘ 7

|

rlaal | eni lit

‘ ' } 1 ¢

}

é y r '

Dri ( ‘

I

Tv ' {

+ ia

.

| .

perce

WS

Nas <¢

.

A

Lor

nlike

*

oud

co

~~

+]

oI

—|

oe!

+]

a?)

Florida's “PCA” system and

shifting of the burden to thi:

Court for second tier revie'

in}

Denials of

are supposed

So why are we

Florida

severely restrict

Constitution

rights are infringed b

and the first. and

the Florida distri

the only pla

SLI pre meé

dramati

experienced

part of the

So.2d 1356

accomplish

amendment was to stop

called in the local parlancs

AF FIRME!I

é

—r" ”

4 - a

\Jrdae

Motion to V

] ‘ ‘ort Tit

2

aS A Aiv¥ia A

I A IN ¢ ; M ) rih¢ YN A N\

NmmMxrz «eT?

rEeRM

riit VN UJINE VLOK LG

CORPORATION: DEBOR

EMMET DOUGLAS: JOHN DOI

DOE AS UNKNOWN TENAN

\?

OSSESION

Vermeer

‘

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THI

STATE OF FLORIDA SECOND SITRICT, POST

OFFICE BOX 327, LAKELAND, FL 33802-0327

CASE NO.: 2D09-458

> Y\r7 fA +

()()'/ -¢ ,-()]

IB R-S

1) Y

Appellant/Petit

BY ORDER OF THE COUR

THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TH!

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND F'

‘ARASOTA COUNTY. FLORID

CIVIL DIVISIO}

felnehie NE =

LPC JR. ATIO

EBORAHE DOUGLAS; EMME’

DOUGLAS; JOHN DOE; JANE DO

AS UNKNOWN TENANTS IN

POSSESION OF THE SUBJE'

ROPERTY,

Defend

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION [TO] VACATE

CERTIFICATE OF SALE AND CERTIFICATE OF

TITLE

THIS MATTER

tiff Option One Mortgage Corporation's Motio:

Vacate Certificate of Sale and Certificate of Tit]

id the Court, having heard the agrument of t!

: roel on bl 7 | ape, eee nenne os

rties, reviewed the file, tne relevant case [aw al

Ons

proceedings |

Ganon, Krevan

Hollywood,

foreclosure |

Marshall _ {

Lauderdale, Florida

Shlishey The Best

¥

by Georg:

i

AV}

» set aside tl

and certificate of title pursual

of Rule 1.540(b), Florida Rule

wal

articulated by the Florida Su

;

1e roreciosuré

? i. ney Fe,

Buchanan, 190 &

Option

telephons

hearing tt

appeared

judgment of {

no defendants

Watson Firm

proces 1ed

i *foa¢ + T

presen

100.00

and shghtly mor

Option (ne

1?

in dequate an

lute:

foreclosure file

logged into

r> P

tr ioca

peen Into thel

‘he pending sale date wot

n the case management

Jennifer Lipovsk:

received an email from Sue

handling the firm's post judgment

S|

her that she had just paid and inv

sale in the Option One case bu

ale date had not been entered

Lipovsky immediately checl

docket for Sarasota County

Judgment had been filed and recorded

23, 2008, with a sale date of October

Clerk's docket also showed that

recorded on Novemeb«

n contacted the Sarasota

confirmed that the

j

d ORDERE!

“ ertan —

rected tN)

AA

'T’ # Ah

( l4/Z39 1!

1008 NOV 7 01:59 PN

KAREN E. RUSHIN(

THE CIRCUIT COUR’

LASOTA COUNTY, FLORID

POMERT FE 1ITNOKEF

sist.

> me

EK, Receit

+t

Via

EXCERPTS