Amicus Curiae Brief — Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc.
Supreme Court brief1993
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
No. 91-1200
In The
Supreme Court of the United States
October Term, 1991
S
THE CITY OF CINCINNATI,
Petitioner,
V.
DISCOVERY NETWORK, INC., et al.,
*
Respondents.
SJ
On Writ Of Certiorari
To The United States Court Of Appeals
For The Sixth Circuit
e
BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE OF
LEARNING RESOURCES NETWORK
IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS
o
Bruce R. STEWART
Counsel of Record
CHaries H. CARPENTER
Pepper, HAMILTON & SCHEETZ
1300 Nineteenth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
(202) 828-1200
Attorneys for Learning
Resources Network
Dated: May 29, 1992
SeV0eeeNewe?otyloraoelele_oaae———————————————————————————————————
COCKLE LAW BRIEP PRINTING CO. 225-6964
OR CALL COLLECT (402) 342-
|)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES......................55. ii
INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE................... 1
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT....................... 3
RT Pee PN Pe RE hes F.: 4
PEE standecdsaccdabesuteucuanccuacel 12
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Page
Cases:
Board of Trustees v. Fox, 492 U.S. 469 (1989).......... 11
Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp., 463 U.S. 60
SPUR TMUE WES ORUUSNENUGRDE S000 oc cccrecevccceccee 10
Central Hudson Gas & Electric v. Public Service
Comm'n, 447 U.S. 557 (1980) ..............00 ccc eee 11
Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Service Comm'n,
Ere 11
Virginia Pharmacy Bd. v. Virginia Citizens Consumer
ouncil, 425 U.S. 748 (1976).... 0.0... c eee. 9
STATUTES:
90 Stat. 2081, Education Amendments of 1976........ 5
MISCELLANEOUS:
Durkin, Struggling to Teach: Growing Success Puts
Free College in Red, Wash. Post, July 12, 1990....... 6
R.M. Hutchins, Preface to 1 Great Books of the West-
le cceucecceces 4
Sanchez, Johns Hopkins to Broaden Its D.C. Opera-
Soom, Woaem. Post, Jam. 14, 1992 ......... 0. ccc c cece 7
U.S. Department of Education, Digest of Education
entree eur neéceesseecoeses 5, 6, 10
C. Van Doren, Benjamin Franklin (1938)............... 4
Waterman, How to Succeed in Two Easy Lessons,
ee ee nd ccccccecccccccces 6
No. 91-1200
¢
In The
Supreme Court of the United States
October Term, 1991
+
THE CITY OF CINCINNATI
Petitioner,
V.
DISCOVERY NETWORK, INC., et al.,
Respondents.
S
On Writ Of Certiorari
To The United States Court Of Appeals
For The Sixth Circuit
+
BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE OF
LEARNING RESOURCES NETWORK
IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS
s
INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE
Learning Resources Network (“LERN”) is an associa-
tion of providers of adult and continuing education.’
Founded in 1974, LERN is comprised of approximately
5,000 public and private educational organizations,
approximately 1,200 of which are non-profit educational
institutions with organizational memberships. LERN’s
members include state universities, private colleges,
' This brief is filed pursuant to Rule 37.3 of the Rules of
this Court, accompanied by the written consent of all parties.
1
community colleges, public elementary and secondary
schools, hospitals, museums, city and county recreation
departments, and churches, as well as private for-profit
education program providers.2
? The breadth and geographic diversity of LERN members
is reflected by LERN’s board of directors:
President-Elect President
Dr. Richard T. Walsh Greg Marsello
R.T. Walsh & Associates Imperial Pearl Co.
Wallingford, Pennsylvania Providence, Rhode Island
Greg Spears, Dean D. Searcy, Director
Community Education Covington Campus
Camosun College Northern Kentucky University
Victoria, British Columbia Covington, Kentucky
Dr. Grace Smith, President Sandra Geisinger
Smith Associates, Inc. Schenectady, New York
Troy, Michigan LaNeta L. Carlock, Director
Francis Chiaramonte, Dean Westside School
Continuing Education Community Education Center
Hartford Community College Omaha, Nebraska
Hartford, Connecticut Willie J. Richardson, Jr.
Ken Cicora Delta College
Ft. Lauderdale Parks University Center, Michigan
and Recreation Hugh B. Hammett
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida Empire State College
Mary Lou Harris Continuing Education
Assistant Director Saratoga Springs, New York
Continuing Education Rebecca Strong,
Athens, Ohio Community Services
Mary Anne Varacalli McHenry County College
Delaware County Crystal Lake, Illinois
Community College
Media, Pennsylvania
Among LERN’s most important functions is its role
as a research organization, information clearinghouse,
and forum in which members exchange information
regarding successful practices in educational program-
ming, including practices relating to the marketing and
promoting of course selections to the public. Through this
exchange of ideas and techniques, LERN and its members
have developed substantial expertise in marketing and
promoting adult and continuing education programs.
Many of the members of LERN distribute informa-
tion about their course offerings and programs in a man-
ner similar or identical to the manner chosen by
respondents — that is, by the use of newspaper boxes for
the distribution of free pamphlets, newspapers or fliers
on municipal sidewalks. As a result, LERN and its mem-
bers are concerned that, should the Court reverse the
decision below, other municipalities may follow Cincin-
nati’s example and attempt to regulate communication
with prospective students. Such a result would cause
educational providers, prospective students, other infor-
mation providers and their recipients great hardship in
continuing to carry on their dialogue with each other.
.
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT
Adult and continuing education has played a long
and distinguished role in the intellectual life of the
Nation. Education providers such as the members of
LERN depend to a great extent on the continued avail-
ability of streetcorner newspaper boxes as a cost-effective
means to distribute information about their offerings.
4
There are no adequate alternatives for providing afford-
able dissemination of course catalogs to the segments of
the student population reached by streetcorner news-
paper boxes. In addition, LERN and its members are
concerned that petitioner and its amici may attempt to use
the designation “commercial speech” as a vehicle to
accomplish content-based time, manner, place restric-
tions. Even if such an attempt was permissible, it would
not be warranted given the information contained in the
course catalogs.
S
ARGUMENT
A.
Western intellectual history has been likened to a
great conversation across the ages.? Adult and continuing
education is an important vehicle for allowing ordinary
citizens to take part in the conversation. Since Benjamin
Franklin started his Junto discussion group in 1727,4
adult and continuing education has played an important
role in ‘American intellectual life. Indeed, the importance
of adult and continuing education has been explicitly
recognized by Congress, which has found, inter alia, that
“lifelong learning . . . enable[s citizens] to adjust to social,
technological, political and economic changes” and “to
participate in the civic, cultural or political life of the
3 R.M. Hutchins, Preface to 1 Great Books of the Western
World at xi (1955).
* C. Van Doren, Benjamin Franklin 74-80 (1938). Franklin
seems to have borrowed the idea from Cotton Mather. /d. at 75.
Nation.” By all accounts, interest in adult and continuing
education has been increasing.®
> Specifically, in addressing adult and continuing educa-
tion Congress has found that:
“(1) accelerating social and technological change have had
an impact on the duration and quality of life;
(2) the American people need lifelong learning to enable
them to adjust to social, technological, political and economic
changes;
(3) lifelong Jearning has a role in developing the potential
of all persons, including improvement of their personal well-
being, upgrading their workplace skills, and preparing them to
Participate in the civic, cultural, and political life of the Nation:
(4) lifelong learning is important in meeting the needs of
the growing number of older and retired persons;
(7) more effective use should be made of the Nation’s
educational institutions in order to assist the people of the
United States in the solution of community problems such as
housing, poverty, government, recreation, employment, youth
opportunities, transportation, health, and land use: and
(8) American society should have as a goal the availability
of appropriate opportunities for lifelong learning for all its
citizens without regard to restrictions of previous education or
training, sex, age, handicapping condition, social or ethnic
background, or economic circumstance.”
Education Amendments of 1976, Pub. L. 94-482, § 101, 90
Stat. 2081, 2086 (now codified at 20 US.C. § 1002 (1988)).
* The United States Department of Education estimates
that in 1984 some 23 million people took adult education
classes, of which only about 5 percent were enrolled as full-
time students in a degree program. U.S. Department of Education,
(Continued on following page)
Contemporary course offerings are not restricted to
the great ideas. in virtually every major city in the United
States —- and in many smaller cities as well — an adult may
enroll in courses concerning virtually any subject;-from
French literature to computer programming.” These
courses enrich the lives of their students by providing
citizens access to cultural and vocational opportunities
that would not otherwise be available. They also add to
the common heritage of American society. Other courses,
which teach survival skills such as literacy or self-health
and wellness, offer a more fundamental value to students
and to society. Perhaps as important as the content of any
particular course, students taking adult and continuing
courses benefit from their continued interest in self-
improvement. As a society we are improved by the efforts
(Continued from previous page)
Digest of Education Statistics 319 (1989) (“Digest of Education
Statistics”). The Department also estimates that in 1982 more
than 5 million adults were enrolled in adult and continuing
education programs. Id. at 318. LERN estimates that the
number participating may now approach 15 million people. In
1989, courses offered by the Fairfax County, Virginia, public
school system alone attracted 55,000 adult students. Waterman,
How to Succeed in Two Easy Lessons, Wash. Post, Jan. 4, 1990, at
J9. Programs around the country are experiencing increasing
enrollments. See, e.g., Durkin, Struggling to Teach: Growing Suc-
cess Puts Free College in Red, Wash. Post, July 12, 1990, at J1.
7 Among the more notable educational offerings in adult
and continuing education was a course in constitutional law
taught at Washington Saturday College by Chief Justice Warren
in 1968. Durkin, Struggling to Teach: Growing Success Puts Free
College in Red, Wash. Post, July 12, 1990, at J1.
of individual members to improve themselves, partic-
ularly those who may be outside the scope and reach of
traditional, formal post-secondary education.
From its beginning, adult and continuing education
has been a decentralized, student-driven endeavor. In
each locale, the educational offerings are tailored, often
by the discipline of the marketplace, to the needs and
wishes of the student population. Unlike more formal
post-secondary education, adult and continuing educa-
tion is designed to reach the broadest possible student
population.® Inclusiveness and ready access are guiding
principles.
These principles and the diversity of program offer-
ings compel educational providers to use methods of
disseminating information about programs that reach
into every segment of society. Streetcorner newspaper
boxes are an important part of this dissemination process,
as they provide one of the most cost effective ways to
provide detailed information concerning the course offer-
ings to the widest range of potential students. Although
adult and continuing educators use a variety of means to,
communicate with the communities they serve, there are
no adequate alternative methods which replicate all the
advantages of streetcorner newspaper boxes.
8 In recognition of the fact that these programs serve a
distinct student population, approximately 2,500 of the
nation’s 3,600 colleges and universities also offer adult and
continuing education programs. Indeed, part-time college
study, which includes adult and continuing education, is the
fastest-growing segment of higher education nationwide,
accounting for some 6 million students. Sanchez, Johns Hopkins
to Broaden Its D.C. Operation, Wash. Post, Jan. 14, 1992, at B2.
For example, many educators distribute information
through public libraries, typically using either a pamph-
let rack or bulletin board. While library distribution is an
important method of reaching some of the potential stu-
dents of adult and continuing educational offerings, only
library patrons may be contacted in this manner. But
many pctential students, including perhaps those most in
need of literacy programs, are not likely to be reached
through library distribution.
Another method for disseminating information is
mass mailings of course catalogs. This alternative to
streetcorner newspaper boxes, however, is also unsat-
isfactory. First, bulk mailing is prohibitively expensive.’
Second, unlike streetcorner newspaper boxes from which
only truly interested potential students take course cata-
logs, mass mailings by definition mean providing cata-
logs to persons who have no interest in taking courses.
Coupled with the inefficiency in targeting mass mailings,
mailing costs many times more per enrolled student than
newspaper box distribution.
A third distribution alternative to streetcorner news-
paper boxes is newspaper inserts, which involves insert-
ing a course catalog inside a newspaper, which is then
sold at the newspaper’s regular outlets, including
* The cost of mass mailing has been increasing. The stan-
dard nonprofit postal bulk rate has doubled in the last three
years. LERN estimates that it costs around $150.00 per thou-
sand brochures for distribution by mail as opposed to $25.00
per thousand for distribution by streetcorner newspaper box.
streetcorner newspaper boxes. Inserts, however, have the
same negative cost and targeting attributes of mass mail-
ings.1°
The issue of whether adult and continuing education
course catalogs were properly characterized by the dis-
trict court as “commercial speech” is not now directly
before the Court.!! However, LERN and its members are
concerned about this categorization.
Among LERN’s members are public entities such as
public school systems, municipal recreation departments,
and state universities. The continuing education course
catalogs of such institutions do not “propose a commer-
cial transaction.” Virginia Pharmacy Bd. v. Virginia Citizens
Consumer Council, 425 U.S. 748, 762 (1976). This is true
even when a nominal enrollment fee is charged, because,
as a matter of common sense, education is not a
10 By permitting streetcorner newspaper box distribution
of for-profit newspapers but not educational materials stand-
ing alone, petitioner appears to argue that newspaper box
distribution of adult and continuing education materials is
permissible, but only if the education provider pays the news-
paper to allow the materials to be inserted. As newspaper
boxes containing newspapers with inserts present the same
aesthetic and safety features as newspaper boxes containing
only the inserts, it is difficult to discern the community interest
served by compelling education providers to use inserts.
1! Respondents did not appeal the district court’s deter-
mination that their publications are commercial speech.
10
“commercial” activity when carried out by a public
body.!2 Yet such catalogs are virtually identical in both
form and content to those prepared by privately operated
adult and continuing education providers.
The membership of LERN includes both for-profit
and non-profit educators.1* LERN’s experience quite
plainly suggests that there is no significant difference in
either the substance of the educational offerings,’* the
catalogs, or in the methods of distributing course cata-
logs’ between education providers that may happen to
have different corporate structures. For this reason, any
attempt on the part of Cincinnati — or any other munici-
pality — to distinguish between the course catalogs of one
kind of provider and those of another bears little relation-
ship to the interests advanced by petitioner. Streetcorner
newspaper boxes containing the course catalogs of non-
profit educational offerings present the same aesthetic
and safety features as those containing for-profit catalogs,
12 Even if a course catalog may be characterized as com-
mercial speech, it may not be regulated as such if the actual
content of the course offerings is protected speech. See Bolger v.
Youngs Drug Products Corp., 463 U.S. 60, 67 n.14 (1983).
13 The United States Department of Education found 8,469
noncollegiate institutions offering post-secondary education in
1987-88. Digest of Education Statistics at 324. Of these, 659 were
publicly owned, 1581 were private non-profit, and 6,229 were
private for-profit. Id. This survey did not include public
schools and municipal recreation departments.
14 Typically, for-profit educators will pioneer new types of
courses, which, if successful, will be subsequently offered by
non-profits as well.
15 Non-profits are charged lower postal rates for mailing
course materials and catalogs.
11
or, for that matter, those containing for-profit news-
papers. By arguing that it may regulate for-profit course
catalogs because they are commercial speech, petitioner
and its amici apparently seek to assert that a distinction
can be made between identical speech acts based solely
on the identity of the speaker.'¢
Categorizing speech as non-commercial or commer-
cial may be helpful in analyzing certain cases. This is not
such a case, however. The category of commercial speech
serves mainly to allow states to protect against effects
related to the content of speech. See, e.g., Board of Trustees
v. Fox, 492 U.S. 469, 475 (1989) (protecting educational
atmosphere while preventing commercial exploitation of
students at a state university). In this case, however,
petitioner has expressed no interest whatever in the con-
tent of respondents’ speech, but is merely using the low-
ered standard of review applicable to the regulation of
commercial speech as a vehicle to justify the otherwise
impermissible: a content-based time, manner, place
restriction. See Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Service
Comm’n, 447 U.S. 530, 536 (1980) (time, manner, place
restrictions must be content neutral).
16 One might try to distinguish the speech of private enti-
ties from those of public ones on the ground of motive, an
approach not without difficulties. See Central Hudson Gas &
Electric v. Public Service Comm'n, 447 U.S. 557, 579-80 & n. 2
(1980) (Stevens, J. concurring). In any event, at the speech act
level, the motive is the same: The education provider prints
and distributes catalogs hoping to attract students to the
courses. Facile distinctions based on ownership or corporate
structure do not meet the regulator’s burden of “distinguishing
the harmless from the harmful.” Board of Trustees v. Fox, 492
U.S. 469, 480 (1989).
12
* * *
Adult and continuing education providers, whether
public or private, profit or non-profit, depend to varying
degrees upon streetcorner newspaper box distribution.
All types of continuing educators, not merely private, for-
profit educators such as respondent Discovery Network,
Inc., share an indivisible interest in the continued avail-
ability of this method of distribution of course materials.
+
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the court
of appeals should be affirmed.
Respectfully submitted,
Bruce R. STEWART
Counsel of Record
CuHar.es H. CARPENTER
Peprer, HAMILTON & SCHEETZ
1300 Nineteenth Street N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
(202) 828-1200
Dated: May 29, 1992 Attorneys for Learning
Resources Network
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.