Prologue — Bertera's Hopewell Foodland, Inc. v. Masters

stil a Set cae Offive-6 game Court, U.

a eo ee.

LIBRARY. ey ae erat Bs |

| FEB-20 1068

ee

Y .. SUPREME COURT: 'U. 5 a

| . s | es Ao Ca kek: DAViS, CLER’ a

b sae 8 \a IN THE wae i

ee ae ®

a SupremeCourt of the United States |

% Cy ae cine October Term, 1967, |

' +g ti} , * —_ ; . .

SA ee et ae | BERTERA'S HOPEWELL FOODLAND, ING, |

Oe 8 BR x <a ie “ anpetied, . .

3 om i ~ sie ; " “vs. . a hy

Se SS oy ROBERT J. MASTERS, District. pita aver

eee a ; _ + County, JOHN A. KRZTON, Chief County Detective of — .

ee Beaver County, LOUIS POLCE and STEVE D.- |

a MIHAISC, County Detectives of Beayer County and ~

ceed . other Municipal and State Law Enforcement Officers, ,

_- Rages se all members of a class,: .

Z 1 oie as. . Appellees.

im Ow AppEaL From THE SUPREME Court or PENNSYLVANIA

BS Oe et -JOmaNDECTHONNAL, STATEMENT :

: q eee ae ak “ = oe —

a 6 eas tel ey oe HUBERT L. TEITELBAUM, ay

. _. | MARTIN M. SHEINMAN, °

1124 Frick Building,

Pittsburgh, en, a 15219,

‘Attorneys for Appellant,

Morais, Sarter & TerTELBAUM, °

1124 Frick Building, :

Pittsburgh, Pa.’ 15219,

of Counsel. ~~

BATAVIA TIMES, APPELLATE COURT PRINTERS, ® . , ie

EDWARD W ARNON, REPRESENTATIVE,

S022 CARLYN Saree, * PITTSBURGH, PA., 15236, .

aiz. 661-7463.

‘

AEST ORY SRNODE ANC I ARI ne ten ihe rN Hist

“AT alae ee an oil

.

Sosy

P . i

4

;

-

g

-

> TABLE OF CONTENTS. A

es pe Sek ae ST PAGE

. Opinions Belew .............. Benenorgucepesesscudes = an

Grounds fer Jurisdiction ........ sseiiahiacatin’s vihees ae.

Nature of Proceedings .......... en ep ccheesieces 2

Judgment Sought to be Reviewéd ......... a es

Statutory Jurisdiction ~....... eseneee acehysecbc - -§:

Cases Sustaining Jurisdiction ................ —

Pennsylyania Statute. and Constitutional Provision

Involved kénnwies biiceeenborascubaaenecessaee.. =

Questions Presented by tlie Appeal eieae bias 4 Cre Ee

_ Statement of the ME Cages uectksddkaccaevekiues eV &

Reasons Why Federal Questions Are Substantial . 9

: >. A. The Statute Is Vague ......... peeuews ipa 2 er

B. The Statute Is Discriminatory iskpakadene”

Conclusion ec acgbesecsqcaccnccsdedssaabbert? cascuk | oe

Appendix A—Opinion of Court of Sodus Pleas are

_Beaver County, Pennsylvania filed May 4, 1966 . 23 -

~~ Appendix B—Opinion of Court of Common Pleas of

Beaver County, Pennsylvania filed July 27, 1966 ... 49

_ Appendix C—Opinions of the Supreme Coyrt of Peiin- ae es

sylvania dated November 28, 1967 ........ euenes «61

. Appendix C-1—Opinion of the Court: ..... 2, - as 61—

Appendix C-2—Concurring Opinion, Bell, C. J. 92.

’ Appendix C-3—Concutring- Opinion, Roberts, z on:

_» Appendix C-4—Dissenting. Opinion, O’Brien, J... 104

: Appendix C- 5—Opinion Vacating’ wicates Cohen, z 111

Tass oF Cases.

” Arrigo v. Lincoln, 154 Neb. 537, 48 N. W. 2d 643

EE Wkanudere Cac acbbakehhGadethne bese iebesanke 22

Bantam Books, Ine. v. Sullivan, 372 U, 8. 58, 83 S..Ct.

631 = (etneanaueeke Mawnan weene ETT TT TTT TT 3°

ee ooo Sah Ses

duteo ttn:

he? wae rn: <" Gee

a en Re3 PAGE .

~ Broadbent v. Gibson, 105 Utah 53, 140 P:.2d 939 .... 20

| City of: Hot Springs v. Gray, 215, Ark. 242, 219 S. W.

2d 930 (1949) 2.2.8: RT ce?» RAD 21

Deese v. City of? Lodi, 21 Cal. App. 2d 631, 69 P.- ais

ga, 1908 .(1987) oc eves ce eevee: ee ae

Elliott v. State, 29 ‘Aris. 839, 242 P. wi

Giaccio v. State of Pennsylvania, 382 U. S. 399, 402,

"86S. se WME evo sascucanciceaccises: -

—— Harvester Co. v. Kentucky, 234 U. S. -

SS are rie ee a

ae Fontes s FoodaStores v. City of: ‘Telare, 12 Cal. 2d -

SOON Pe OE BE COI oo oon ncak ck eadsacedens - 22

La zeta v. State” of paw Jersey, 306 U. $$. 451 (1939)

PA so BR BB.

. AleGowan v. State of Maryland, 366 U. 8. 420, 81'S.

oy Ct.1101 (1964) 2.2... 6.08. Tees Se eS

Mt. Vernon v. Julian, 369 Ill. 447, 17 N, . 2d 52, —o

rs ge ERD 20 cence eds a he a - 20°.

Pacesetter. Homes, Ine. v. Village of South Holland;

- Ilinois, 118-Il. 2d 247, 163 Nv E. 2d 464 (1959). .

Pierce y. U,S., 314 U.S. 306, ©. > (1941) ee 12

\ Sarner v. Union Twp., rad N. J. Super. 523, 151 A. 2d

. 298 (1959) SUE RARE SAR RAN eb A eBeabihee conse 20

Standard Oil Co. y. ;. California v. Jolinsod, 316 U. S. 481, .

- 6258. Ct. 1168 (1942) 2.2.20. KCL EA RAOUOCERKE NOS 3.

- Terry Carpenter, Inc. v. “Wood, 177 Neb. 515, "129° |

ON. W. 2d 475 (1964) ...... Pa Bete w eee 21, 22

Two Guys from Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinley,

366. U. S. 582, 81 S. Ct. 1135 (1961) os... eee. .. 16

‘U. S.v. Cardiff, 344 U. S. 174 (1952) -...... ee

_ U.S. v. National ca Products Corp., 312, U. 8. 29 -

| (1963) . ideekhabs SRRCROLA AAS ahig b40% ohn Kei 11

Winters v. People of State of N. Y,, 333 U. R. 507, 68. -

' §. Ct. 665. GREED hiweececocwrcescscccede awedeas - 8

Winters v. U.S., 333 U. S. 507, ee (1948) 12

_ Act of June-24, 1939, P. L.-872, as amended vy :

= - plemented by Section 699. 15, added, September 27,

1961, P. L. 1695, Sec. 1, Title 18, Purdon’s Pa. Stat.

t. See. 4699.15, p. 541 (1963 Ed.) . Pescgeeks we, o

‘Ret of. June 25, 1948, c. 646, 62 Stat. 929, Title, 28,

United States Code,, Section 1257 8) eeieiéacnmy Oe ?

a ; ear “Consrerunion. x nn ‘ol

| United States Constitution. ...... coe ik OES .8 28".

- Amendment XIV ............ “so wagp s0 sons ose y Up Ob OO

- Amendment XIV, Sec. 1 ..... 4 ERI RCR ehoseena 4.

A. i)

atti a ON, _ MISCELLANEOUS.

i i cicciciidaycnscvabsesacegeca Me

Vol. 82, C. J. S:, Statutes: ' - ae | :

Sec. 163, p. 277° ..... Sesens eases mecscsvesceces IT

We MM oad ccccccscessncnensct Bweceo ff

‘Sec. 1555, p. 263 ..... Diecitiee eh iain keto kkwks is 17 _—

, Ps pe . st ‘ . :

ope cat | Ae uae

‘ |

\ a

“

4 . *- * .

“-

J .

4 — j

* ‘ Ww

’ - . 4 es

: . .

ie ML + @ ‘ . ”

*

} e a

e .

Pay

* ‘ . =

’ . : a

j oo? .

jue,” s ’

, ee

. : .

. ° 4 ° .

- ‘0 by

av’ Pa . [ ©

a

see ~~

a . ’

4 er .

“ .

\ /

. ad ‘2

é ‘

- .

.

° . P .

oe g .

~ ° .

ary

‘ ”

, ’

a] . ‘

. ,

. S ‘. ’

‘ a mS q

7 ? s e

J

. se

; .

, e od ’

e . 4

” r }

. ‘

. ’

. .

”

, « .

P - ™ of

’ ¥ a

. ” .

. , ‘ a

. ’ 7 - Me .

. . ° =

» 4 « e 4

>

at a a

9 ‘ x

* . >

. . . bd

. v6

- .

. . & “*

°, a

-* e

‘ B-

‘* . 2? .

. e : J

.

. . &

. j .

®. , ’

* ‘* i »,

“

‘

‘\

”

sd .

’ .

.

° .

. -

.

23%

*

7@

. | od

oe «4 ‘

. ® *

¢ »

s , Cd

* . ;

ad ’

.

x -

.

” 7s

.

.

.

.

’

* e :

.

.

.

° al 3

a, e

-

é

.

+ "

.

,

.

-

ad .

1d *

ee

-* .

s°

se ’

° ‘

.

J .

e-

* oe

7.

_ INTHE

| Supreme Court of the United States

EET s on Term, 1967

' : oe BERTERA M's HOPEWELIPOODLAN D, INC.,

- te Pee . Aggetes, *

a ‘Vs. @ | a4 :

ROBERT J MASTERS, District Attofney of Bebive'l

_ County, J OHN A! KRZTON, Chief County .Detective

‘, of Beaver, County, LOUIS POLCE and STEVE ‘D.

-. MIHALIC; County Detectives of Beaver County. and —

other Municipal and State Law Enforcement _

all members of a class,. eee

: x? . o ‘Kaw, bites.

On ApprAL FROM THE Supreme Court or PENNSYLVANIA &”

=~

oo

JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT

; The appellant appeals from the judgment of the.Supreme :

~ Court: of Pennsylvania entered on November 28, 1967,

_.affirming the decision of the Court of Common Pleas of

Beaver County, Pennsylvania, and appellant submits this .°

~ statement to show that the Supreme.Court-.of the United -

States has jurisdiction of the appeal. and meaty a . substantial

_question is presented. t

Opinions Below

The opinion of the Court @ Common Pleas of Beaver

ear is not officially Teported. A copy of this opinion

=) ‘ *