Petition for Rehearing — Dora L. Adkins, Petitioner v. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C.
Supreme Court briefApr 23, 2024
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
No. 23-912
In the
Supreme Court of the Anited States
DORA L. ADKINS,
. Petitioner,
Vv.
THE RITZ-CARLTON HOTEL COMPANY, L.L.C.,
Respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
PETIITON FOR REHEARING OF DENIAL OF
PETIITON FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Dora L. Adkins, Pro Se
P.O. Box 3825
Merrifield, VA 22116
DoraAdkins7@aol.com
April 23, 2024
dl
1
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
The corporate disclosure statement in the
petition for a writ of certiorari remains accurate.
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT............. 1
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........ccccccceccsseesessesseeeees ill
PETITION FOR REHEARING..........ccccceccseeeeeees 1
REASONS FOR GRANTING REHEARING.............. 1
PETITIONER’ RIGHTS TO LIFE, LIBERTY,
AND PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS DENIED
FOR 19-YEARS sconsscosremssesuasssinnteesasmescenoissniesencs: 1
ARGUMENT. .......... .sssisssipiseesseseccanenenerepnennnecneennonensenee 6
SUPREME COURT'S GVR PRACTICE..........c eee 6
I. JUSTICE FOR THE PETITIONER IS DUE
TO RIGHT THE WRONGS. ..........ccccccccceeseeseeeeees 8
II]. RE-VISIT OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
COURT OF APPEALS OPINION............ccc00 10
IiIl.GOD’S DEVINE INTERVENTIONS AND
MIRACLES INTO THE PETITIONER’S LIFE
ARE PROVEN REPEATEDLY...........0c cece 11
CONCLUSION ....... cencssxcnsswsnscasicicuite sasespinescesusnesiewiats 12
RULE 44(2) CERTIFICATE. .........cccccceeseesssececseeeees 13
APPENDIX
Appendix 1 Reproduction of Emails Sent to
Various Hotels.........cccccceeesesseceees App. 1
Appendix 2 Copy of Receipts for Petitioner’s
Stays, Fold-Out Exhibits .......... App. 238
il
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Rules
Supreme Court Rule 44(1)
Supreme Court Rule 44(2)
PPUTUTETET EE
1
PETITION FOR REHEARING
Pursuant to Rule 44.1, Petitioner Dora L.
Adkins respectfully petitions for rehearing of the
Court's April 1, 2024, decision.
REASONS FOR GRANTING REHEARING
This Court’s Rule 44.2 authorizes a petition for
rehearing based on “intervening circumstances of a
substantial . . . effect.” In the Petition of Dora L.
Adkins v. The Ritz Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C.,
Petitioner lived outdoors for 1-Year and 6-months
and/or 554 days and nights from the extreme fear of
being chemically poisoned to DEATH since the filing
of the Complaint against The Ritz Carlton Hotel
Company, L.L.C., in August 2022. Petitioner has lived
in a hotel non-consecutively for 45-days combined and
the following is just ONE example of all the times
Petitioner lived in a hotel, there was grave danger of
the Petitioner losing her LIFE by actions taken at
EVERY Hotel stayed. (Appendix 1-22, Petition for
Rehearing).
PETITIONER’S RIGHTS TO LIFE,
LIBERTY, AND PURSUIT OF
HAPPINESS DENIED FOR 19-YEARS
Petitioner seeks to obtain a GVR via a petition
for rehearing based on a new development of
attempted premeditated murder of the Petitioner by
use of chemicals on the Petitioner’s Head and/or Brain
that followed the denial of certiorari. On March 29,
2024, Petitioner checked into the Hyatt Regency Hotel
located in Reston, VA and attempted to request an
extended stay from a Front Desk Agent but was
quoted some very high daily rates and dates of the
2
Hyatt Regency Hotel being sold-out for an event, so
Petitioner paid for only Friday, March 29, 2024, and
for Saturday, March 30, 2024, with plans to check-out
on Sunday, March 31, 2024. (Appendix 1, 4, Petition
for Rehearing).
Petitioner after staying at the Embassy Suites
Hotel, located in Springfield, VA for 13-days and
nights without Heat and/or 20-degrees below inside
the Guest Room #726 and coming in contact with a
deadly chemical of fumes (to the Petitioner) followed
by living outdoors for eight-days and nights
desperately needed to wash Petitioner’s hair.
(Appendix 5-9, Petition for Rehearing). When
Petitioner arrived to Guest Room #1558, a
Housekeeper’s Cart was in the hallways and/or just in
front of Guest Room #1558. Petitioner asked the
Housekeeper for a new bottle of Shampoo and
Conditioner but was informed by the Housekeeper
that there were no new bottles because the Shampoo,
Conditioner, and Shower Gel were refilled by
Housekeepers. The Housekeeper nervously offered the
Petitioner some Shampoo and Conditioner from the
large containers that were manually labeled and used
to refill the Shampoo, Conditioner, and Shower Gel
containers placed inside the Guest Rooms. Petitioner
allege nervousness from the Housekeeper who almost
provided the Shower Gel for Shampoo. Petitioner
knows from experience from staying in a hotel from
19-Years of being Homeless, to not use anything in any
Guest Room SOLD to Petitioner for allegedly it is with
great possibility of contamination. Petitioner was
shocked to learn from the Housekeeper on March 29,
2024, that the containers of Shampoo, Conditioner,
and Shower Gel were not new containers because
3
since the Hotel Brands such as with Hilton, Hyatt, and
Marriott for the pass four-years switched from small
individual Shampoo, Conditioner, and Shower Gel
provided to Guests to large mounted containers of
Shampoo, Conditioner and Shower Gel in the Bath
Room shower of the Guest Rooms for shared use by all
Guests; Petitioner upon Petitioner’s request at checkin was provided the three containers as being brand
new containers. (Appendix 1-4, Petition for
Rehearing).
Petitioner after switching out EVERYTHING
in Guest Room #1558 as it related to the Bed Linens,
Petitioner took a shower and washed Petitioner’s hair
using the Shampoo and Conditioner poured into two
separate empty paper coffee cups by the Housekeeper.
The Petitioner got ready for bed and noted the
air/heating vents appeared to be extremely dusty on
the outside of the air/heating vents, so Petitioner
quickly turned off the Heat and/or any sort of blowing
fan in fear that the air quality inside Guest Room
#1558 was contaminated. (Appendix 1, 4, Petition for
Rehearing).
On Saturday, March 30, 2024, Petitioner
awoken with an EXCRUCIATING, DEBILITATING,
and EXTREME Migraine Headache as Petitioner first
thought and immediately took two Excedrin for
Migraines which normally takes Petitioner’s Migraine
Headaches away immediately. The Petitioner began
getting SICK inside Guest Room #1558 and
immediately got dressed and went to the Front Desk
of the Hyatt Regency Hotel to get the GM’s contact
information. Feeling extremely SICK, the Petitioner
had to wait for the Front Desk Agent to get off the
4
telephone and once the Front Desk Agent was off the
telephone, the Front Desk Agent clearly through
verbal and non-verbal communication did not want to
assist the Petitioner regarding the GM’s contact
information. Babin Shrestha, Assistant Director of
Operations came out to the Petitioner and Petitioner
was happy to see Babin because Babin checked the
Petitioner into the Hyatt Regency Hotel located in
Reston, VA for an extended stay for almost 2-months
appropriately 6-7 Years prior when Babin was a Front
Desk Manager. The Petitioner asked Babin for the
GM's name and email address, and Babin provided the
information for Keith Spinden, GM and Troy Holt,
Sales Manager's information because it had been
passed on to Babin that Petitioner was looking for a
set rate for an extended stay. Petitioner did not let
Babin know that Petitioner was EXTREMELY SICK,
but asked Babin if Babin could provide a small bag of
mini chocolate chip cookies to coat Petitioner’s
stomach for something Petitioner had just taken, and
Babin agreed and stated the mini chocolate chip
cookies were on Babin. (Appendix 1-4, Petition for
Rehearing).
The Petitioner returned to Guest Room #1558
and quickly got back into bed even though resting
Petitioner’s Head on a pillow was extremely painful
which proves just how much pain the Petitioner was
suffering. Petitioner had been praying to GOD and
continued with the ritual of prayer to GOD because
Petitioner knew Petitioner’s writ for certiorari had
been conferenced before the Justices for the United
States Supreme Court on Thursday, March 28, 2024,
and the decision would be posted on April 1, 2024.
Petitioner witness is Babin Shrestha because Babin
5
telephoned the Petitioner inside Guest Room #1558 on
Saturday, March 30, 2024, at 4:00 p.m., to inform the
Petitioner Babin could assist Petitioner with the rate
for the extended stay. Petitioner in a dying state
remembered the telephone call but was unable to
communicate while going in and out of consciousness.
Petitioner met Babin at the Front Desk on Sunday,
March 31, 2024, and Petitioner still did not let Babin
know what was happening and apologized to Babin for
sounding out-of-it and in a state of not being able to
communicate on the telephone. (Appendix 1-4,
Petition for Rehearing).
The Petitioner presented in a dying state and
was unable to get out of the Hyatt Regency Hotel for
food and/or just leave the Hyatt Regency Hotel.
Petitioner had been in a dying state before in Adkins
v. Davidson Hotel Company, LLC., Record No.
Alexandria Circuit Court; Judgment entered 2022;
from septic chemical poisoning inhalation inside the
Hilton Alexandria Mark Center Hotel located in
Alexandria, VA; and in Adkins v. The Ritz Carlton
Hotel Company, L.L.C., in 2014; from septic chemical
poisoning inhalation inside The Ritz Carlton Hotel,
which resulted in DEATH of the Petitioner. (Appendix
1-4, Petition for Rehearing).
On April 2, 2024, GOD took all the excruciating,
debilitating and extreme pain from Petitioner’s Head
and/or a Brain Injury away and safely guided
Petitioner out of the Hyatt Regency Hotel. GOD let
Petitioner know for 100% that an attempted
premeditated murder of the Petitioner by use of
chemicals on the Petitioner had taken place along with
air inside Guest Room #1558 from very dusty
6
draperies, and furniture that has been left with
accumulated dust also contributed to Petitioner’s
dying state for three-days. (Appendix 1-4, Petition for
Rehearing).
Petitioner provided a factual detailed Email
regarding the attempted premeditated murder to
Keith Spinden, GM for the Hyatt Regency Hotel,
located in Reston, VA on the early morning of April 3,
2024. (Appendix 1-4, Petition for Rehearing).
ARGUMENT
SUPREME COURT’S GVR PRACTICE
“Even after the denial of a petition for
certiorari, one could still obtain a GVR via a petition
for rehearing based on a new development that
followed the denial of certiorari. The catch is that the
rules provide a window of only twenty-five days
following the denial of certiorari in which to seek
rehearing. (In rare and extraordinary circumstances,
the Court might entertain an untimely petition for
rehearing, but you should not count on such an act of
grace.) What types of new developments could
warrant filing a petition for rehearing following the
denial of certiorari? The most pertinent here is a new
Supreme Court ruling that casts doubt on the
judgment in your case and the grant of certiorari in a
case that could turn out to do so. The Court has
granted rehearing and GVR’d in such circumstances
on a number of occasions.”
There is not going to be a new Supreme Court
Ruling that casts doubt on the judgment in the
Petition of Dora L. Adkins v. The Ritz Carlton Hotel
Company, L.L.C., because the Complaints and
7
Petitions set precedence because it is included in the
forty-five food and chemical poisoning of the Petitioner
which caused 18-DEATHS are one of its kind in the
History of the United States Supreme Court. (See,
Petition).
“The Supreme Court’s rules require that an
attorney seeking rehearing certify that the request is
based on the grounds listed in the rule and is not being
used for purposes of delay. (See, Petition Rule 44(2)).
But it does have its place. In any event, setting aside
the matter of rehearing, appellate counsel should
certainly be familiar with the Court’s ordinary GVR
practice, which offers a fairly reliable way to take
advantage of helpful new developments that postdate
the judgment of a court of appeals.”
The attempted premeditated murder of the
Petitioner by use of chemicals on the Petitioner’s Head
and/or Brain that caused Petitioner to be in a state of
dying occurred between March 29, 2024, and April 2,
2024, which postdate the judgment of the Fourth
Circuit Court of Appeals on November 28, 2023.
“A GVR order is further warranted in this case
under the general standard set forth in Lawrence
that the Court can discern a “reasonable probability”
that such order may result in different outcome below,
“py flagging a particular issue that ... does not appear
to have been fully considered” below.”
The particular issue that “appeared to have not
been fully considered,” is that the Petitioner, Dora L.
Adkins would be targeted through a new development
of attempted premeditated murder of the Petitioner by
use of chemicals on the Petitioner's Head and/or
8
Brain. There were approximately 10-different
attempted premeditated murders of the Petitioner
during the stays of 45-days but none of the attempted
premeditated murders were successful; except, to
cause EXTREME and DEBILITATING physical and
emotional injuries to the Petitioner which forced the
Petitioner to live outdoors 1-Year and 6-months and/or
554 days and nights almost consecutively WITHOUT
a restroom/bathroom, shower, food, or a bed to sleep
in, to list the main essentials to living. The
approximately 45-days were used by Petitioner to
respond to Court documents to the 4* Circuit Court of
Appeals and to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The particular issue worded differently is that
the Petitioner AFTER Dora L. Adkins v. The Ritz
Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C., feared to stay in a
Hotel again and that fear became a reality when
Petitioner was placed into a dying-state as the facts,
proof & evidence describes.
I. JUSTICE FOR THE PETITIONER IS DUE
TO RIGHT THE WRONGS
Facts presented in this Petition for Rehearing
shows just another attempted premeditated murder to
the 45 such lawsuits previously filed by the Petitioner
alleging chemical and food poisoning in the Petition
for Writ of Certiorari; and in this case for the use of
chemicals on the Petitioner’s Head and/or Brain; that
could aid in ending the nightmare for the Petitioner by
the granting of the rehearing and by vacating the
denial of the writ of certiorari in the Petition of Dora
L. Adkins v. The Ritz Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C.,
Record No. 23-912.
SY)
Petitioner filed the following lawsuits as
directed by GOD as Emergency Complaints: Adkins v.
Tysons Lodging LLC., Docket Number 1:22-cv-00553-
AJT-WEF, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
of Virginia, Alexandria Division; Judgment entered
2022; Adkins v. Fitness International, LLC., Docket
Number 1:22-cv-00577, U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division;
Judgment entered 2022. Adkins v. _ Fitness
International, LLC., Docket Number 1:22-cv-00749,
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia,
Alexandria Division; Judgment entered 2022. Adkins
v. Ashford TRS, Alexandria LLC., Docket Number 22-
2298, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Virginia, Alexandria Division; Judgment entered
2022. Adkins v. American Service Center Associates of
Alexandria, LLC., Docket Number 22-2126, US.
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia;
Alexandria Division, Judgment entered 2022. Adkins
v. The Ritz Carlton Hotel Company, LLC., Docket
Number 1:22-00934-CMH-WEF, U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria
Division; Judgment entered 2022. Adkins v. Hilton
Worldwide Holdings, Inc., Docket Number 1:22-
00109-AJT-IDD, U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, Alexandria Division; Judgment
entered 2022. Adkins v. SP Hotel, Docket Number
1:22-00399- AJT-IDD, U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division;
Judgment entered 2022. Adkins v. Driftwood Special
Servicing, LLC., Docket Number 1:22-cv-00109-AJT-
IDD, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Virginia, Alexandria Division; Judgment entered
2022. Adkins v. Merrifield Hotel Associates, L.P.,
10
Docket Number 1:22-cv-01017-CMH-WEF, U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia,
Alexandria Division; Judgment entered 2022. Adkins
v. American Service Center Associates, LLC., Docket
Number 1:22-00956, U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division;
Judgment entered 2022. Adkins v._ Fitness
International, LLC., Docket Number 1:22-cv-01130,
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia,
Alexandria Division; Judgment entered 2022. Adkins
v. American Service Center Associates, LLC., et al.,
Docket Number 1:22-cv-01114-LMB-IDD, U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia,
Alexandria Division; Judgment entered 2022.
In addition, there were approximately five
lawsuits filed in the Year 2022, as EMERGENCY
COMPLAINTS with the Circuit Court for Fairfax
County that were all DENIED, and _ one
EMERGENCY COMPLAINT filed with the Circuit
Court for the City of Alexandria in Adkins v. Davidson
Hotel Company, LLC., that was DENIED and
appealed to the Supreme Court of Virginia.
II. RE-VISIT OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
COURT OF APPEALS OPINION
In the following Fourth Circuit Court of
Appeals Opinion, Petitioner asks that this Honorable
Court re-examine the fact that the Opinion
AFFIRMED the district court’s and magistrate judge’s
orders and not a mix-up of the Supplemental Opening
Brief which was GRANTED to the Petitioner:
“Accordingly, we grant Adkins’ motions
to supplement her informal brief and
11
for leave to file an informal reply brief,
grant her motion and her amended
motion to withdraw her supplemental
informal brief, and affirm the district
court's and magistrate judge’s orders.
Adkins v. Ritz-Carlion Hotel Co., LLC,
No. 1:22-cv-00934-CMH-WEF (E.D.
Va. July 11, Aug. 14, Aug. 29, Sept. 7,
Sept. 11 & Sept. 25, 2023). We deny
Adkins’ motions to reverse and remand
and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional
process.” “AFFIRMED.” (See, Appendix
2-3, Petition).
III. GOD’S DEVINE INTERVENTIONS AND
MIRACLES INTO THE PETITIONER’S
LIFE ARE PROVEN REPEATEDLY
This is an appropriate case for rehearing. GOD
and Petitioner were able to present all the facts, proof,
evidence even through Petitioner being in a state of
dying and through and after DEATH of the Petitioner.
Petitioner does not know what Petitioner has done in
LIFE to deserve GOD’s Devine Interventions and
GOD’s Miracles, but Petitioner is grateful beyond
words for GOD’s GLORY, bestowed upon the
Petitioner. How was it possible for GOD to know that
Petitioner needed to stay at the Hyatt Regency Hotel,
located in Reston, VA until April 2, 2024, to meet the
criteria of GVR and/or one day after the Writ of
Certiorari in the Petition of Dora L. Adkins v. The Ritz
12
Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C., was denied on April 1,
2024, but not a day longer to prevent further suffering
of excruciating, debilitating, and extreme pain from
Petitioner's Head and/or a Brain Injury.
Without GOD’s direct involvement Petitioner
would not have the memory to author the Complaints
and Petitions. GOD supplies EVERY detail.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, and those stated in
the petition for a writ of certiorari, the Court should
grant rehearing, vacate the denied petition for writ of
certiorari, and review the judgment below.
Respectfully submitted,
Dora L. Adkins, Pro Se
P.O. Box 3825
Merrifield, Virginia 22116
DoraAdkins7@aol.com
13
RULE 44(2) CERTIFICATE
I hereby certify that this petition for rehearing
is restricted to the grounds specified in Rule 44.2 and
presented in good faith and not for delay.
/s/ Dora L. Adkins
Dora L. Adkins, Pro Se
P.O. Box 3825
Merrifield, Virginia 22116
DoraAdkins7@aol.com
APPENDIX
i
APPENDIX
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Appendix 1 Reproduction of Emails Sent to
Various Hotels ............... App. 1
Appendix2 Copy of Receipts for Petitioner’s Stays,
Fold-Out Exhibits............ App. 23
App. 1
APPENDIX 1
Reproduction of Emails Sent to Various Hotels
EXHIBIT #1: HYATT REGENCY, RESTON, VA
doraadkins7@aol.com
From:doraadkins7@aol.com
To:Keith.Spinden@Hyatt.com
Ce:doraadkins7@aol.com
Wed, Apr 3 at 12:33 AM
CONFIDENTIAL EMAIL: FOR MY PROTECTION
AGAINST RETALIATION
April 2, 2024
Dear Mr. Spinden:
I checked into the Hyatt Regency located in Reston, VA
on Friday, March 29, 2024, and attempted to request
an extended stay from a Front Desk Agent but was
quoted some very high daily rates and dates of being
sold-out, so I paid for only Friday, March 29, 2024, and
Saturday, March 30, 2024, and had planned to checkout on Sunday, March 31, 2024.
When I arrived to Guest Room #1558, a Housekeeping
Cart was parked at a Guest Room adjacent to Guest
Room #1558. I took some Housekeeping items from the
Housekeeper’s Cart such as sheets, bath towels and
sought other needed items from a Housekeeper
cleaning the Guest Room beside Guest Room #1558. I
asked the Housekeeper for some pillowcases, wash
App. 2
clothes, hand towels and some new containers of
shampoo and conditioner. The Housekeeper claimed
that there were no new bottles of shampoo and
conditioner and that the containers already inside the
Guest Rooms were refilled from the large containers on
her Cart.
Upon my request from the Housekeeper on the 15th
Floor, she poured some shampoo and conditioner into
two different coffee cups, but almost poured some
shower gel instead for shampoo. I quickly washed my
hair. When J awakened on Saturday, March 30, 2024,
Texperienced the WORST MIGRAINE HEADACHE, so
I thought. I took two Excedrin for an extreme and
debilitating Migraine Headache, but the Headache did
not go away.
Still very SICK with a Brain and/or Head injury at
approximately 11:30 a.m., I went to the Front Desk of
the Hyatt Regency Hotel and waited for the Front Desk
Agent to get off the telephone. I asked Ekram, Front
Desk Agent for your Business Card. Ekram asked if
she could help me and I stated, “No.” Ekram stated
there was no GM presently for the Hyatt Regency Hotel
and she wrote the following to my request: Resto-front
office, Static@hyatt.com When I believed Ekram did not
understand English, I wrote the following on an
envelope: “Please provide me with the GM Name for
the Hyatt Regency and Business Card.” I was feeling
very Sick that I requested from Ekram to finish up
with my request before waiting on the next Guest in
line and Ekram COMPLETELY ignored me and went
on to wait on the next person. I then requested to speak
to a Manager and Ekram stated no one was in yet and
App. 3
one other person was busy. I asked that the busy
person be contacted, and Ekram did, but not before
waiting on two other Guests.
Babin came out and I was happy to see him because he
checked me into the Hyatt Regency, Reston for an
extended stay appropriately 6-7 Years prior. I asked
him for the GM’s name and email address, and he
provided your information and Troy Holt, Sales
Manager’s information because it had been passed on
to him that I was looking for a set rate for an extended
stay.
I asked Babin for a bag of cookies and told him that I
needed to coat, my stomach for something I was taking,
still not letting Babin know I was SICK. I did not let
Babin know that I was extremely SICK and that I was
requesting your email address to report a chemical may
have gotten on my head and/or brain from the shampoo
and conditioner I used on Friday, March 29, 2024. I
could not get out of bed except to use the bathroom for
the entire day of Saturday, March 29, 2024. I WENT
INTO A DYING STATE.
Still in a DYING STATE, Babin telephoned me to let
me know that he could possibly work out an extended
rate plan for me because he saw that I was checking
out on Sunday, March 31, 2024, and that the GM would
not be returning until Monday, April 1, 2024. I
informed Babin, that I would think about it because I
WAS TOO SICK TO LEAVE THE HYATT REGENCY
HOTEL.
App. 4
Sunday, March 31, 2024, I extended my stay through
Babin for Sunday, because J was still in a DYING
STATE AND TOO SICK TO LEAVE THE HYATT
REGENCY HOTEL. I went without any food to eat
because I was too SICK TO LEAVE THE HOTEL. I
went to the Front Desk and got three food items of junk
food just to coat my stomach to take Excedrin for
Migraines and REALIZED THE MIGRAINE
HEADACHE WAS NOT GOING AWAY AND THAT I
HAD A HEAD AND/OR BRAIN INJURY BECAUSE
THE EXCEDRIN FOR MIGRAINE HEADACHES
AFTER TAKEN GOES AWAY IN LESS THAN A
COUPLE OF MINUTES.
The outside of the vents in Guest Room #1558
appeared dusty so I was afraid to use the Heat, in fear
J would inhale some bad air.
NOTE: WHEN ASKED HOW WAS MY STAY BY
MUMPHIE, HOUSEKEEPING MANAGER WHO
PHYSICALLY CHECKED ME OUT OF GUEST
ROOM #1558 ON APRIL 2, 2024, AND ANOTHER
EMPLOYEE FROM MANAGMENT WHO CHECKED
ME OUT AT THE FRONT DESK ON APRIL 2, 2024,
I STATED THE STAY WAS OKAY. I WOULD HAVE
SENT THE EMAIL TO THE GM ON SATURDAY,
MARCH 30, 2024, AND/OR EARLIER BUT WAS TOO
SICK TO DO SO AND BECAUSE I WAS TOO SICK
TO LEAVE THE HYATT REGENCY HOTEL.
App. 5
EXHIBIT #2: EMBASSY SUITES,
SPRINFIELD, VA
On Wednesday, March 138, 2024 at 12:31:27 AM EDT,
<doraadkins7@aol.com> wrote:
CONFIDENTIAL EMAIL: THE EMAIL WAS
MARKED CONFIDENTIAL TO PREVENT
RETAILATION FROM EMPLOYEES INVOLVED IN
SELLING ME A GUEST ROOM WITH NO HEAT
AND AN OUT-OF ORDER GUEST ROOM #726: THE
PILLOWS ON THE BED SHOULD HAVE BEEN
THROWN OUT FIVE YEARS AGO. THE TOILET
WAS LEFT UNCLEANED WITHA POOL OF DRIED-
UP URINE LEFT WHERE THE LID HAD BEEN
PARTIALLY NOT FASTENED DOWN.
Dear Mr. Ahmed,
This email is to let you know that on Tuesday,
March 12, 2024, someone using a Key Card entered
Guest Room #726 with a Do Not Disturb sign hanging
on the outside of the door to Guest Room #726.
I am guesting the un-authorized entrance was to turn
the HEAT on. So, I opened the electric panel and found
that there were two switches an off and on.
I left the Embassy Suites Hotel for a meeting on
March 12, 2024, and when I returned, the thermostat
was set at 72 degrees; whereby, I had turned the
thermostat to 85 degrees because I was freezing from
NO HEAT on Monday, March 11, 2024. I WENT FIVE
DAYS AND NIGHTS WITH NO HEAT; BUT A
BLOWING OF EXTREMELY COLD AIR THAT MADE
ME SICK WITH AN EXTREME AND DIBILATATING
App. 6
MIGRAINE HEADACHE. Guest Room #726 was warm
with HEAT for the first time.
After returning, I went directly to the Guest Laundry
Room, and placed my clothes in the tallest washer to
learn that it no longer excepts coins. I immediately
telephoned the Front Desk and was told by the Front
Desk Agent someone would be sent right away. I
wasted approximately IHOUR and 1/2 in the Guest
laundry Room to be met by a very unprofessional
engineer who pretended he was called for the dryer
when my clothes could be visibly seen in the washer.
WHY IS HE ANGRY WITH ME FOR NOT HAVING
ANY HEAT IN GUEST ROOM #726 AND
REPORTING SUCH. I HAVE NEVER BEEN MET
WITH SUCH RUDENESS!!! He unplugged the washer
and placed AN OUT-OF ORDER SIGN ON THE
WASHER. The second man pushed a card with tools on
it and he didn’t say a word. They both left and shortly
afterward an employee came and took the sign off the
door that indicated photo shoots would be taking place
between 11:00 a.m. and 1:30 p.m. He didn’t speak to
me nor asked if EVERYTHING was okay.
The employee from the Front Desk took her time in
returning the $4.50 as I requested and had feed the
Washer hoping to see a START indicator. The Front
Desk Agent demanded I return with her to the laundry
room to get the $4.50 for a signature, and I stated I
could sign on my tablet. There were no apologies from
ANYONE.
THERE WAS NO SPELL CHECK AVAILABLE ON
THIS COMPUTER.
App. 7
Sincerely,
Dora Adkins
On Sunday, March 10, 2024 at 09:19:17 AM EDT,
doraadkins7@aol.com <doraadkins7@aol.com> wrote:
AAhmed@ih-corp.com
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: doraadkins7@aol.com <doraadkins7@aol.com>
To: [Ahmed@ih-corp.com <iahmed@ih-corp.com>
Ce: doraadkins7@aol.com <doraadkins7@aol.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2024 at 09:17:05 AM EDT
Subject: CONFIDENTIAL EMAIL - PLEASE
CORRECT THE RATE OF THE GUEST ROOM
CONFIDENTIAL EMAIL - PLEASE CORRECT THE
RATE OF THE GUEST ROOM AND PLEASE
RESPOND TO THIS EMAIL:
March 10, 2024
Dear Mr. Ahmed:
I am a guest at the Embassy Suites, Springfield, who
checked into the Embassy Suites Hotel on March 7,
2024. I extended my stay on Friday, March 8, 2024,
with a black male Front Desk Agent until March 11,
2024,
I had checked the rate with Zohal, Supervisor for
March 7, 2024, and Zohal QUOTED ME $270.00 for
March 7, 2024; $157.00 for March 8, 2024; and
March 9, 2024, for $185.00 as the Hilton Honors Rate.
I don’t have funds to PAY $270.00 for a RATE FOR
THE ENTIRESTAY. I had requested to speak with the
App. 8
employee for sales for Embassy Suites to get a better
rate for an extended stay, the employee was off on
March 7,2024. I HAD PLANNED TO STAY BEYOND
MARCH 11, 2024, BUT THE VERY COLD GUEST
ROOM #726 HAS MADE ME SICK ALL THREE DAYS
AND NIGHTS.
Guest Room #726 was SOLD to me OUT-OF-
ORDER.
1. Guest Room #726 has NO HEAT.
2. I asked two Housekeepers who did not understand
the question, one instead provided me a Do Not Disturb
sign.
3. The mattress covering had two specks of blood on it
when I stripped the bed, in fear of coming into contact
with such.
4. I ordered some items for Guest Room #726 and was
provided sheets for a Queen bed.
5. When I attempted to correct the wrong size sheets
and forgotten requested housekeeping items for Guest
Room #726, the Housekeeper then delivered the items
on top of a laundry bag and placed the items on the
floor on the outside of Guest Room #726. What living
person does not know one should not place linens and
towels on the dirty floor where people walk.
WHO WANTS TO BE SOLD A GUEST ROOM WITH
NO HEAT AND ONE THAT IS OUT-OF-ORDER AND
ALLEGEDLY RIPPED-OFF WITH A HIGH RATE OF
$270.00.
App. 9
On March 10,2024, I went to the Front Desk and asked
Zohal, Supervisor for your Business Card and she
claimed that you did not have a Business Card nor
could she lookup the email address.
I ASKED ZOHAL TWICE ON SUNDAY, MARCH 10,
2024, HOW TO TURN THE HEAT ON AND ZOHAL
CLAIMED THE HEAT IN THE GUEST ROOM IS
CENSORED BY THE PERSON IN THE GUEST
ROOM.
NO, I DO NOT WANT AN ENGINEER INSIDE OF
THE PAID FOR GUEST ROOM WHEN THE
HOUSEKEEPER WHO CLEANED GUEST ROOM
#726 AND THE SUPERVISOR OR MANAGER WHO
WAS REQUIRED TO CHECK THE QUEST ROOM
BEFORE RELEASING THE GUEST ROOM BACK TO
BE SOLD TO GUESTS HAD TO HAVE KNOWN
THERE WAS NO HEAT INSIDE GUEST ROOM #726.
Sincerely,
Dora Adkins
App. 10
EXHIBIT #3: HILTON
FAIR LAKES, FAIRFAX, VA
doraadkins7@aol.com
From:doraadkins7@aol.com
To:Johnesainko@hilton.com
Ce:doraadkins7@aol.com
Wed, Mar 6 at 8:48 PM
March 6, 2024
CONFIDENTIAL EMAIL
Starting from the Latest to Other Incidents During my
Stay at the Hilton, Fair Lakes that Started on
Thursday, February 29, 2024:
SECURITY ISSUE:
On March 5, 2024, when I returned from my vehicle
parked in the parking lot to reenter the Hilton Hotel,
Fair Lakes, there was a white or foreign male (didn’t
take to close of a look) standing inside the door of the
Hilton, Hotel and asked me how he could get into the
Hilton without his Key Card. He stated out loud, “She
is not going to answer.” I did not answer the staged
person holding only a few items of clothing and
QUICKLY took off and walked to the front entrance of
the Hilton Hotel. Since I was somewhat running and/or
walking very fast, I looked back to see the same person
following me, but in the distance.
I used my Key Card to reenter the Hilton Hotel and
found not aSINGLE PERSON AT THE FRONT DESK
AND/OR ANYWHERE IN THE HILTON HOTEL. I
HAVE STAYED AT EVERY HILTON HOTEL IN
NORTHERN VA AND IN RICHMOND VA, AND
NEVER FOUND A LACK OF SECURITY AS AT THIS
App. 11
HOTEL. THERE IS A CAMERA INSIDE THE
HALLWAY AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE HOTEL BY
THE ELEVATORS
I TELEPHONED YOU AT APPROXIMATELY
4:20 P.M. ON 3/6/2024 BUT YOU HAD LEFT FOR
THE DAY AND THE OTHER PERSON IN
MANAGEMENT WAS OFF; TWAS ALSO INFORMED
THERE IS NO SECURITY FOR THE HILTON
HOTEL.
ENTRANCE INTO GUEST ROOM #912 WITH A
DO NOT DISTURB SIGN HANGING ON THE
OUTSIDE OF THE DOOR TO #912:
On Thursday, February 29, 2024, I ordered some items
from Housekeeping and requested the items be placed
into a plastic bag and left on the outside of Guest Room
#912. The Housekeeping male came with the bath
towels draped over his shoulders and the rest up
against his body, who banged on the Guest Room Door
#912 numerous times even after I reported the problem
to the Front Desk Agent. The same Housekeeper male
employee does not allegedly understand that towels
etc., should not be handled with the same plastic gloves
that handled the trash from the Ice Room located on
the 9th floor. THAT IS ONE OF THE REASON I
USED NOTHING INSIDE OF A GUEST ROOM AND
HAVE TO SWITCH EVERYTHING OUT.
On March 1, 2024, I stopped by the Front Desk and
extended my stay until Tuesday, March 5, 2024. When
I returned to the Hilton Hotel, the Guest Room #912
had not been cleaned and/or at least the floor NOT
vacuumed, but the bed linens had been changed out.
[OCR skipped on page(s) 31-60]
[Read from a scan; the first 30 pages.]
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.