Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Akohomen Ighedoise, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court briefJun 18, 2024

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

APPENDIX A

USCA11 Case: 23-10

Document: 32-1

Date Filed: 01

2024

Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

Mnxhh States Court of Appeals

lor % Hututtl] (dtrcutf

No. 23-10270

Non-Argument Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

AKOHOMENIGHEDOISE,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00320-SDM-MRM-l

Date Filed: 01^^2024

USCA11 Case: 23-10270

Page: 2 of 2

Document: 32-1

Opinion of the Court

23-10270

Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Akohomen

Ighedoise in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw

from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the record reveals that counsel s assessment

of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ighedoise’s

conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

1 Ighedoise’s motions for appointment of counsel and to proceed in forma

pauperis are DENIED.

USCA11 Case: 23-10

Document: 37-2

i^p/2024

Date Filed: 0

Page: 1 of 2

3ln %

Mmhb JShttes dfourt of Appeals

Jfor

Httanilj Circuit

No. 23-10270

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

AKOHOMEN IGHEDOISE,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

DC. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00320-SDM-MRM-l

ON PETITION(S) FOR REHEARING AND PETITION(S) FOR

REHEARING EN BANC

USCA11 Case: 23-10

Document: 37-2

>^p

Date Filed: 0

/2024

Order of the Court

Page: 2 of 2

23-10270

Before Jordan, Newsom, and Anderson, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED, no judge in

regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court

be polled on rehearing en banc. FRAP 35. The Petition for Panel

Rehearing also is DENIED. FRAP 40.

APPENDIX B

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TAMPA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

)

vs.

AKOHOMEN IGHEDOISE,

Defendant.

(Call to Order of the Court at 9:25 a.m.)

THE COURT:

Perhaps counsel will step

forward to the clerk's table, along with the defendant, please.

Case No.:

Good morning.

We are together in Case

15-Criminal-320, United States of America vs. Akohomen

Ighedoise.

8:15-CR-320

:•

)

3SENTENCING PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE HONORABLE STEVEN D. MERRYDAY

January 18, 2023

9:25 a.m. to 10:40 a.m.

Who speaks for the United States?

MR. SCRUGGS:

Scruggs for the United States.

THE COURT:

And who speaks for the defense?

MR. TROMBLEY:

Good morning. Your Honor.

Patrick

Good morning, Mr. Scruggs.

Good morning, Your Honor.

Wes

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE PLAINTIFF:

FOR THE DEFENDANT:

ALSO PRESENT: =5

PATRICK SCRUGGS, ESQUIRE

Office of the United States Attorney

400 North Tampa Street

Suite 3200

Tampa, Florida 33602

WESLEY E. TROMBLEY, ESQUIRE

Trombley S Hanes

707 North Franklin Street

Tenth Floor

Tampa, Florida 33602

Trombley for Mr. Ighedoise.

THE COURT:

Good morning, Mr. Trombley.

You are Akohomen Ighedoise?

THE DEFENDANT:

Yes, Your Honor.

THE COURT:

Mr. Ighedoise, on September 13 of 2022, you pleaded

Good morning.

guilty to Count 1 of a superseding indictment.

you with conspiracy, in particular, a conspiracy to commit mail

and wire fraud, in violation of parts of Sections 1341, 1343,

and 1349 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

entered an order that accepts your plea of guilty, and that

adjudges you guilty of the conspiracy offense charged in

Count 1.

Count 1 charges

AKOHOMEN IGHEDOISE, DEFENDANT

(Proceedings recorded by mechanical stenography, transcript

produced by computer-aided transcription.)

REPORTED BY:

Rebekah M. Lockwood, RDR, CRR

Official Court Reporter

(813) 301-5380 I r.lockwoOduscr@gmail.com

P.0. Box 173496, Tampa, Florida 33672

I earlier

So as of the entry of that order, your guilt was

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

determined, and it remains this morning to determine your

THE DEFENDANT:

sentence.

THE COURT:

As I know Mr. Trombley has explained, I will

Yes, Your Honor.

First, Mr. Trombley, is there any

objection the factual content of the presentence report?

determine your sentence by first determining an advisory

MR. TROMBLEY:

sentence in accord -with the United States Sentencing

THE COURT:

Guidelines.

And by next inviting both the United States and

without objection for the purpose of the advisory Guideline

the defense to direct my attention to any matter, including

range, and, of course, before considering any other applicable

those at 18 U.S.C. 3553(a), that I should consider in arriving

factors, is there any objection to the offense level of 33 and

at a final and reasonable sentence in accord with applicable

a criminal history category I, as recommended by the probation

law.

office?

Then the factual content is adopted

I'll begin by asking Mr. Scruggs if he's had an

MR. TROMBLEY:

opportunity on behalf of the United States to review and

THE COURT:

evaluate the presentence report, and if so, whether the United

States objects either to the factual content of the presentence

report or to the application of the Sentencing Guidelines that

is recommended by the United States Probation Office

MR. SCRUGGS:

THE COURT:

MR. SCRUGGS:* Yes, Your Honor, I have.

And the

No, there's not.

No, Your Honor.

All right.

No objection.

Then, preliminarily, that is

adopted as the advisory Guideline calculation.

Mr. Scruggs, is there a motion on behalf of

Mr. Ighedoise under 5K1 or otherwise?

There is not, Your Honor.

Okay.

In that case, Mr. Trombley,* I'11

United States has no objections to either the factual portion

recognize you to advance any matter in mitigation, any matter

or the application of the Guidelines.

under 3553, after which I'll recognize Mr. Ighedoise to speak

on his own behalf, if he chooses to do so.

THE COURT:

Mr. Trombley, have you and Mr. Ighedoise

had an opportunity together to review and evaluate the

presentence report?

and the several attachments.

MR. TROMBLEY:

THE COURT:

Yes, Your Honor.

I note that I did receive your sentencing memorandum

I read the memorandum in which

you listed the several certificates.

Mr. Ighedoise, have you seen the

maybe that many — that the defendant has earned during his

presentence report and discussed it with your counsel?

detention in recent years.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT.

I think about 70 that —

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

And I read the other material, not all of it with the

approximately six years in this Toronto South Detention Centre,

which I knew nothing about until this case.

same precision, but I did review all the material that you

provided.

statement, but just to let you and Mr. Ighedoise know that I

investigative articles and so forth, as well as a investigative

did review all the material that was available to me.

report or analysis by the Ontario Department of Health, I

And I don't

believe it was.

I had hoped that Your Honor

THE COURT:

would have received the memo, as you did, and thank you for

MR. TROMBLEY:

going through that.

That's not to discourage you from making a complete

MR. TROMBLEY:

Understood, Your Honor.

intend to go through everything.

Then we supplied the Court a series of articles,

Yes.

That set forth a lot of very troubling

issues within the Toronto South Detention facility, and we

Just to restate, we did file on January 10th of this

brought that to the Court's attention with the argument that is

year a sentencing memorandum on Mr. Ighedoise's behalf, which

included in the memorandum that the time he spent there did

we've both been through a good length, at least at two

appear to be convincingly more difficult and harsh than the

meetings, and we feel comfortable with the arguments obtained

time he would have spent either in a better run facility in

within the memorandum.

Canada or here in the United States under our laws and our

that filing for the request for variance.

facilities.

So we will rely mostly on those — on

And, Judge, that, just very briefly is, as you

And, Judge, along those lines, sorry t}o back up, for

pointed out, is extraordinary educational and what I've called

his credit for the time while he was incarcerated, his good

rehabilitative efforts while incarcerated.

works, there was a letter from a sergeant at the facility.

3 I . 23

I haven't been

doing this that long, but I've been doing it long enough, it

THE COURT:

seems, that he is one of the only — he is the only defendant

MR. TROMBLEY:

where I've seen that, to the extent of certificates and ability

Again, I've never seen someone in a prison facility write a

to kind of broaden his horizons and expand his mind in

letter for an inmate anticipating sentencing.

education while incarcerated, which I thought was impressive

And then third. Your Honor, this is something I,

and worthy of note.

again, have never experienced, kind of this little bit of

difficulty determining how to apply credit for the time he has

The second. Your Honor, Mr. Ighedoise spent

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

■

Yes.

Which I thought was impressive.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-;V

served in Canadian custody, which appears to be about 74

months.

later, and then his federal custody date and arrest over to the

■would like to read.

United States reflects a much later date, November 17th of

THE COURT:

2021, when in fact his arrest was O'-i.-'ber 7th, 2015.

assignment of credit is initially within the domain of the

there's a very, very

Bureau of Prisons.

THE COURT:

when he is sentenced and remanded to the custody of the United

MR. TROMBLEY:

States Marshal, he'll remain in custody here for a brief time

in the memorandum, Your Honor —

while the Bureau of Prisons designates him to a facility and at

THE COURT:

that time determines a date of release from that facility and

MR. TROMBLEY:

So, Your Honor, my understanding and

from federal custody.

I've spoken with Mr. Scruggs and also had some correspondence

release, they will consider the extent to which he is entitled

with the agent in this case, that in conjunction with US —

to credit in their view.

with the US agent on this case, they, together, sharing

date that they convey to his designated facility, and it will

information and facts and information that was used in this

include credit for that, and he has an internal Bureau of

case later, used that to effect an arrest in Canada.

Prisons remedy available to contest that credit determination.

Because the extradition paperwork, I think, came much

Mr. Ighedoise did prepare a statement that 1 know he

His arrest in Canada?

Arrested in Canada, and as I outlined

What triggered that arrest?

Arrested

have for the Court.

Let me just say one thing.

The

So just so Mr. Ighedoise will know that

So in determining the date of that

And then they will adjust the release

him under Canadian purposes or reasons, but then later dropped'

that case in favor of the US indictment.

occasion to have someone come back here, which I think you have

the right to dc, ultimately, because it has to do with the

So there is an acknowledgment, I think, by the

During my term on the bench, I've never had an

government, and Mr. Scruggs certainly can clarify that that

legality of the tail end of your sentence, I've never had

arrest was really this case, and that was October 2015.

anybody come back here and lodge a habeas writ or its

equivalent based on that credit determination.

Your Honor, so for those reasons, and kind of that

odd amount of time where we're requesting this large variance

How to say this, the Bureau of Prisons is not

in Canada, we've asked for a sentence of 34 months, which would

interested in unduly detaining people at their expense.

be an actual time of incarceration of 108 months.

generally, they're — what I'm saying is, it's a very

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

That's all I

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

So,

straightforward and fair process of determination.

HR. TROMBLEY:

Understood, Your Honor.

This just

care about others, not taking into consideration the suffering

and heartaches my actions were causing the victims, and I

became a narcissistic human being.

struck me as one that perhaps was slightly different and

concerning for when they may begin the time.

Since my incarceration, I've taken a lot of time to

obviously hope that's not the case.

reflect and understand the gravity of my offense and I'm very

it very clear, either in the PSR or on the record or both,

ashamed of the person I became,

obviously, that's enormously important to Mr. Ighedoise.

my actions, and I'm truly sorry.

THE COURT:

We hope —

To the extent we can make

I think the recommendation of the United

T take full responsibility for

I also realize that my involvement in the criminal

States with respect to that credit is probably of some

justice system has been a source of pain and embarrassment to

significance as well.

my family, and they have expressed their complete repugnance by

presentation.

refusing to have anything to do with me going forward.

not enough apologies I can offer that will be at wording for

all that I have done, and I do not offer any excuse or defense

of any kind to minimize my responsibilities for the offenses to

You're not required to say anything, but

which I have pled guilty for.

if you'd like to say something, this is the time for you to do

During this several-plus years of my incarceration in

Canada, I cannot help but th:. b every day how my very seld-sh

and destructive ways have negatively impacted the life of my

daughter, who has to grow up without a father.

Anyway, so you had finished with your

And, Mr. Ighedoise, you do have an opportunity to

speak on your own behalf this morning.

THE DEFENDANT:

THE COURT:

Yes, Your Honor.

that.

Yes, you may go get your notes if you've made them.

THE DEFENDANT:

Your Honor, I would like to read

something to the Court.

Your Honor, first I would like to thank you for the

opportunity to address this Court.

I would like to say I

apologize to the victims of my crime.

I was — I am very sorry

There's

I know my actions have caused irreparable harm and

loss to the victims of my offense and to my family,

promise this Court from this day forward, I will continuously

But I

for the pain my actions have brought upon all of you and your

find ways to fix all that I have done, and I wish there are

loved ones.

other means available to me that I wish I could show to this

done.

Court how very regretful I am.

No day passes by that I do not regret what I've

I was thinking about myself only.

■ -

Failing to think and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Your Honor, I know you must be familiar with this

pidgin?

kind of voice in your courtroom.

THE DEFENDANT:

does not amount to anything, but throughout the several-plus

THE COURT:

years of my incarceration, all I have done is to find ways to

positively apply myself seeking out avenues where I cen make

THE DEFENDANT:

amends.

THE COURT:

And most times, it probably

In conclusion. Your Honor, I accept whatever sentence

Yes, Your Honor.

Is that what you would call your second

language?

this in the PSR.

Yes, Your Honor.

Okay.

I'd like to amend — I noticed

And with all due respect, it doesn't make

you would impose on me, but I pray for mercy, and I ask this

sense the way it is.

Court to be lenient as possible, taking into consideration my

defendant's primary language is Nigerian pidgin.

remorsefulness and my effort to better myself, please and

term like Creole or dialect or vernacular that describes the

thank you.

state of a spoken or almost surely a spoken language.

THE COURT:

All right.

Thank you.

Just an aside,

So in Paragraph 100, that should say the

Pidgin is a

And the other term is patois, p-a-t-o-i-s, that you

which has nothing to do with what you just said, it says in the

see occasionally.

presentence report, I just wanted to check, your primary

for it to make sense.

language is what?

isn't certainly a widespread phenomenon in Nigerian, the

official language of which is English.

THE DEFENDANT:

in regular English.

THE COURT:

Well, English is the national language of

That should be Nigerian pidgin which

I thought so.

Thank you.

Mr. Scruggs, what says the United States, should I

It's the official language of Nigeria.

say in closing, with respect to a reasonable sentence?

THE DEFENDANT:

think that Mr. Trombley draws a fair question is what to make

THE COURT:, Nigeria is, of course, remarkable because

of this 108 months, I think it was, that he spent in Canada.

it has several hundred distinct dialects that are identifiable.

You don't think of Canada as a place that houses — or that

Some of them, like Hausa and Igbo, and those are more dominant.

supports particularly onerous prison facilities.

Sometimes the generic phrase Nigeria pidgin is mentioned by

you don't like to think of the United States as that.

English speakers.

events suggests that there are some — confirms that there are

Nigeria.

Pidgin English, but I'm also fluent

But you need some word in front of pidgin

Yes, Your Honor.

Is that 3 term that you recognize, Nigerian

. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

And I

Then, again,

Recent

some facilities in the United States, even maintained by the

Canada.

United States that are substandard, to say the least.

and oozed over into Canada.

MR. SCRUGGS:

So what do you say with respect to a reasonable

That was something that originated in the northwest

Is that correct?

I believe that's right, Your Honor.

Although the Canadians did identify, I believe, certain

let me

Canadian victims.

address, if I can, the second question first about the credit.

elderly victims from Canada.

I agree with what Mr. Trombley raid, which is that

THE COURT:

Oozed, ty the way.

is a technical legal

Mr. Ighedoise was arrested in, I believe, October of 2015 on

the Canadian charges.

MR. SCRUGGS:

Yes, Your Honor.

But, ultimately, I

THE COURT:

MR. SCRUGGS:

THE COURT:

MR. SCRUGGS:

sentence here?

MR. SCRUGGS:

Thank you, Your Honor.

Yes.

Those are distinct charges.

Yes .

In terms of a legal analysis, they're

separate sovereigns.

wasn't centered principally on our evidence.

collected their own evidence.

can'': say with a straight face to the Court that

Mr. Ighedoise's arrest at that time was not brought about

because of the United States' investigation.

In other words, we, along with the Toronto police

arrested a number of people in the United States, including

Ms. Ellis, Mr. Cortese, and then we were able to arrest

of events in Canada?

Mr. Ighedoise.

That was in Canada.

Canadians were effectively pursuing this charge to get him in

custody or to have some sort of release conditions if he was

authorities had collected was evidence of events in — that

released in Canada in anticipation of him being extradited to

occurred in Canada?

the United States.

officer of the Court, Your Honor, I think it's fair to say that

the Canadians acted really at our request to push those

My recollection is there was only one

charges.

isolated event in the evidence in this case that occurred in

evidence, that was really at the United States' request, and it

The Canadians had

(

MR. SCRUGGS:

THE COURT:

term.

But I can't —

service and the FBI here, coordinated a joint takedown whe:e we

THE COURT:

We did not bring that prosecution.

I want to say these were these romance-scam.

I'll

MR. SCRUGGS:

Excuse me, the evidence that the Canadian

Correct.

Mostly events in Canada.

There was an international impact as well, but —

THE COURT:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

And w-r understood at the time that che

Again, I think in all candor and being an

Even though they had a separate case arc separate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

was in furtherance of our ultimate extradition.

1 .

before when he was — when he was in detention, but before the

•filing of the extradition?

For reasons beyond our control, meaning the United

States Attorney's Office's control, the extradition process

took several months just to get the paperwork completed.

does not have an objection to noting that in the judgment and

Canada, to my surprise, is a very, I think, onerous - • it's a

for Mr. Ighedoise to receive credit for that,

very — there's a lot.of due process that's afforded to

time, we believe effectively under our process or our

defendants in Canada.

investigation, so we're not opposed to him getting credit for

completed.

that.

So it took some time to get that package

MR. SCRUGGS:

Correct, Your Honor.

The United States

He's served that

I don't know what the best mechanism of doing that, if

Ultimately, from the documentation I received from

it's noted in the judgment, if that is sufficient for BOP.

the Bureau of Prisons, and from the Office of International

as you noted previously, Your Honor, this may be an issue where

Affairs at the Department of Justice, which I sent to

we just have to see how BOP calculates it, and if there's an

Mr. Trombley, they do not right now appear to give

error, then the parties can pursue some sort of correction or

Mr. Ighedoise credit from before when the ex —

remedy after that.

THE COURT:

second.

• 17

Hold on just one

Who is "they"?

MR. SCRUGGS:

Too many pronouns.

Canadians.

I'm sorry.

The Canadians — not the

The. Department of Justice, based on their"

THE COURT:

I think that's right.

But

But I think it's

also right that where there's a colorable basis to credit him

with something, they tend to do it.

e ■ .

So I expect that that will

come out well for him.

calculation, starts the calculation at the filing of the

extradition paperwork in Canada.

Mr. Trombley was gently suggesting, was that a day-for-day

months or so before that, he was — Mr. Ighedoise was in

credit might not be quite equal to the conditions that he —

custody, but there was no extradition paperwork filed, so as of

and they won't do that,

now, it doesn't appear that he is guaranteed to receive credit

but they're not going to say, well, this was unusually harsh

for that time.

and therefore we're going to give him 120 months or 130 months

not —

So for the year, about 18

We do not have the — the United States does

THE COURT:

"Thv;; time" be^ng the 3 8 months or so

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

What they won't do, and which I think maybe

They'll make a one-to-one deduction,

credit for 108 months served.

do that; I've never known them to do that.

I've never — I say they won't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MR. SCRUGGS:

Yes, Your Honor.

«y

I agree.

I think

intimately involved in the money laundering and some of the

And I can't speak to the conditions.

I was

fraud activity, but Mr. Ighedoise was the tie to the criminal

that's right.

surprised.

But I was frankly

organization that was orchestrating all of this.

surprised to see what Mr. Trombley pointed out about the

affiliated, full-fledged member of that group.

conditions in Canada, because I think the general assumption is

that the Canadians, in some respects, have a different

evidence of what Mr. Ighedoise's involvement is, we didn't get

incarceration system than the United States, and perhaps they

as much of a — I thin., a complete picture of exactly what his

have more resources for that.

role was in this investigation.

the documentation of the conditions in Toronto.

We know he helped coordinate where the money was going to,

States isn't disputing that.

helped coordinate some of the fraud.

that beyond what Mr. Trombley has already pointed out.

I'm not contesting them.

And so I was surprised to see

So the United

I just have nothing to add to

He was the

Having said that, Your Honor, in terms of our

We know he worked with Amadi.

But we don't have as many communications from

Mr. Ighedoise that we did for — as we did for Mr. Amadi.

Honor, I think it's fair just to note sort of the two sides of

don't have a sense, I think, of the full scope of his

the balance here.

On the one hand, we have Mr. Ighedoise, who

activities.

I think in some respects, and I don't say this in a derogatory

title.

term, but I think it's fitting, he was sort of the bogeyman of

significant player in this scheme, and I think it's appropriate

to hold him accountable for that.

In terms of a reasonable sentence, though, Your

this case for many years.

Part of that was because he wasn't here.

last defendant who was extradited.

He was the

Mr. Ighedoise was the one member, the actual member of this

did not —

treasurer of this North American chapter in Toronto,

a fairly significant position within this group.

So he had

Mr. Amadi, who is his codefendant, was, I think, more

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

THE COURT:

guilty.

Stop just a second.

He agreed to plead

You say he agreed to cooperate?

MR. SCRUGGS:

Not cooperate.

But he did ultimately come to the United States.

agreed to cooperate and plead guilty relatively quickly.

was, from what we understand, the Ihaza, I-h-a-z-a, or

He was a

He was certainly part of the Black Axe.

He has this

Part of that was because

transnational organized crime group, the Black Axe group.

And that's in a way to his benefit.

He agreed to — well, I

suppose he's been cooperative in a sense, but he hasn't

specifically agreed to —

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

THE COURT:

Well, he gets credit for that with the

acceptance points.

MR. SCRUGGS:

THE COURT:

Yes, Your Honor.

You didn't mean cooperation in the 5K1. /

You didn't meat .substantial assistance.

MR. SCRUGGS:

Correct, Your Honor.

In this case.

information, because by the time he got here, the investigation /

was really over.

pursuing in the United States.

opportunity.

There weren't any more targets that we were

So he didn't really have an

But he, I think, has shown remorse.

He has not put

the government to its burden of proof at trial, and that's a

significant factor here.

Because that's why one of the defendants f

some, I think, very convincing victims who testified, not only

has such a low sentence compared to some others is because of '

in this trial, in the trial of Ms. Ellis and Mr. Cortese and

his — I think he got a total of — maybe the United States

Ms. Johnson, which was before Your Honor.

wound up asking for a total of seven levels for Naji, if I

codefendants here.

remember correctly.

it's so old now.

THE COURT:

MR. SCRUGGS:

THE COURT:

Yes, Your Honor.

Or his sentence would have been much

worse.

MR. SCRUGGS:

That's correct.

It's probably — I

As I think the Court is aware, we had

Those are the

But there was the separate trial of Okechukwu Amadi

who is Ikechukwu Amadi's brother.

working with Ikechukwu Amadi in the United States to help move

the funds.

trial as well, some different victims from Ellis, et al. trial.

And I think, hands down, these victims, it was devastating for

He was also money launderer

And we had a number of victims testify in that

think it's fair to say he was our most significant cooperating

i 17

witness in the case, as well as our venue tie to Tampa, because

most of them.

he was doing the activity here for the group.

But the vast majority of the victims suffered quite a bit.

THE COURT:

There were some other factors in that

reduction that we don't need to repeat here this morning.

just in addition to those — those what amounted to seven

formal levels.

MR. SCRUGGS:

Yes, Your Honor.

And

Mr. Ighedoise didn't r

Some of them were fine.

Some of them recovered.

And on the one hand, you can look at that and say,

well, Mr. Ighedoise should be punished appropriately for the

scale of the crime and the effect it had on the victims, and I

don't deny that.

United States was faced with a dilemma of if we do not offer a

plea agreement, if we do not resolve this case, we're going to

But at the same time, we were faced — the

have really an cuoortunitv Co cooperate mush or provice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

)

have to being those victims back for a trial.

And I can tell you, I still speak to these victims

The United States recognizes that.

So I think balancing it, the equation. Your Honor, if

after seven years, some of them still contact me about the

you look at Mr. Ikechukwu Amadi, who received a slightly longer

restitution process, which, unfortunately, has been delayed by

sentence than what the government would be recommending here,

the codefendants’ appeals in this case.

which is the low end' of 135 months, Mr. Ighedoise and Ikeur.ukwu

want to testify. Your Honor.

were similarly situated, I think, in terms of their

THE COURT:

culpability.

MR. SCRUGGS:

had, I think, more c; a hands-un role i.u managing these money

want to put them through that.

mules who were opening the bank accounts, in terms of

through that.

coordinating the fraud.

evi ience of Mr. Amadi’s involvement.

THE COURT:

MR. SCRUGGS:

And X — they don't

That's the bottom line.

I understand.

I don't

They don't want to come back.

I did not want to put them

I understand.

Our evidence indicates, however, that Ike Amadi

’

We have just much more extensive

Again, some of them have testified

And although Mr. Ighedoise has the title of treasurer

twice in federal court, and these are people, as Your Honor

and he was part of the Black Axe, I don't know that we can say

knows, some of the romance victims in particular never told

with confidence exactly what his role was throughout the

their families, or until they were subpoenaed, had not told

conspiracy.

them.

he doesn't seem to have been as directly involved in a lot of

of them.

the activity.

Ms. Sparks, who testified in the Ellis case.

to bring the victims back if we didn't have to.

They kept it as a secret.

It was a big shame for a lot

And one of the victims passed away since the trial,

So we didn’t want

We know he was giving direction to Ike Amadi, but

I think it'*, appropriate if Mr. Ighedoise receive

something of a lesser sentence than what Mr. Amadi receive, Ike

Amadi, and taking into account the conditions of his

appreciate we could resolve this case by plea agreement so we

incarceration in Canada and the decision to — to plead guilty

didn't have to relive that and have the victims relive it in/

and resolve his case short of trial.

court and bring them here.

To that extent, Your Honor, the government does

discussion about a trial.

And Mr. Trombley was timely with reaching out to

resolve the case before we got to any advanced preparations or

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

THE COURT:

When you say Ike Amadi, you mean

Okechukwu?

MR. SCRUGGS:

Ikechukwu Amadi.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

■?£‘

■ n-

THE COURT:

Ah, yeah.

from the United States?

MR. SCRUGGS:

THE COURT:

MR. SCRUGGS:

THE COURT:

All right.

Anything further

No, thank you. Your Honor.

Any reason not to proceed with sentence?

No, Your Honor.

Mr. Trombley, anything further from the

defense?

the district co"rt, a judge must consider a number of factors.

including, for example, the policies and Guidelines of the

United States Sentencing Commission, the advisory Guideline

range, which was determined earlier, the applicable statutory

penalties.

a maximum of 20 years, 240 months.

MR. TROMBLEY:

Nothing further, other than certainly

take no issue with the facts.

has lived this case much longer than I have.

THE COURT:

MR. TROMBLEY:

He has lived this, as Your Honor

Yes, sir.

The only — again, I know you've

I believe the applicable statutory penalty here is

I consider the written and oral submissions of

counsel, including, of course, the sentencing memorandum and

exhibits that Mr. Trombley filed on your behalf.

consider your statement on your own behalf in allocution, as

the lawyers say, and also the factors at 18 U.S.C. 3553(a).

Generally, none of us address them all, but we address the ones

And I

explained the position with BOP is if the Department of

we think.are most salient in a particular case, as your counsel

Justice, we have documents that's giving him credit for 2017

did ably in his sentencing memorandum on your behalf.

rather than 20:5, there is still mat concern there from our

will discuss those in a bit.

end.

I don't know if there's any more we can do to clarify it.

And I

People tend to phrase these things differently, and I

And I don't know if the other defendants in their — the DOJ

can't quote the statute, but, generally, the first statutory

It-

reflection for the credit of their time was accurate, and

factor is the nature and characteristics of the offense.

that's the date that probation and BOP used.

But if there is

this was — although, unfortunately, not a perfectly singular

kind of that missing link, it's unique to his case, that does

offense, it was in the upper echelon of the category of

cause me still some concern.

offenses, which it is rightly described.

it today.

diversity in the sense that there were a number of different

concepts, fraudulent concepts that were deployed in a number of :

different ways. ■ They’re described very ably, I thought, in the

presentence report.

THE COURT:

MR. TROMBLEY:

THE COURT:

I don't know what we can do about

Any reason not to proceed to sentence?

No, Your Honor.

Mr. Ighedoisa, in imposing a sentence in

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

And

It was unusual in its

It’s difficult to summarize so much

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

evidence in so many cases with reasonable brevity.

But the

probation officer made a heroic effort.

But unlike you, Mr. Ighedoise, I had an opportunity

people go flatline and die in front of them.

So in that same sense that an emergency room

physician needs to maintain their balance, it's necessary for

prosecutors and judges and defense lawyers to do the same, but

/■

to sit right here in this courtroom and listen to some- of your/

victims and some of your lieutenants, some operatives in this /

we still see and experience the pain and suffering that's seen

organization, some with leadership roles, and some, the

caused by the crimes that are tried in our courts.

reasonably conclude that something definitive needs to be done

in response lo those ugregiour nsrms if :ue opportunity in che

law permits.

ultimate end-of-the-line operatives, doing the dirty work,

actually walking into the bank and opening the accounts that

would be used to funnel money and things like that.

And we can

And I'll have to say that I'm a crusty, old veteran

I've seen people testify about their broken dreams

rea.'onable person who observed the consequences of the schemes

But even that,

that you and your colleagues deployed would come precisely to

And I think it's a fair statement to say that any

of trials.

and their broken lives and their broken hearts.

some of these stories were painful to hear,

Watching the jury^

that conclusion.

respond in shock, occasionally, in — with the obvious emotion f

or another who were vulnerable, having some person whose

controlled, witnesses crying on the witness stand, humiliated,

expertise is spotting vulnerability and exploiting it for ..nair

embarrassed, broke, couple of street-level drug addicts that

own gain, well, that's a cold-blooded business.

had been hired for little or nothing to open bank accounts as

calculated business.

ha’-e any rear: .n to th \ . k that v-.u hated any of those people

that were the victims of these scams.

what do we say these days, collateral damage, to enrich you and

emergency room physician can't afford to scream in horror at

your friends.

some of the things that are brought before them in the

if they had any money to put in them and such.

was pathetic.

It was sad.

It was painful.

And as professionals, as much as, I suppose, an

People, for one reason another — one reason

It'§ a

It's probably not emotional.

I don’t

Their agony is just,

You know, if I had a jury sitting right there in that

emergency room, because they have work to do and need to it do

box right now, make it as big a jury as you want, make it a

well and need to do it under control, still, they see them,

hundred, make it a thousand, make it the members of Congress

they see the agony, and they sea the blood, and they see the

that enacted this law, and we put the facts of tils case t

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

. «:>-

n—-

them, say just go back there in that room and deliberate a

while and come back and tell me what the sentence should be.

Do you have any doubt what the sentence would be that they

have committed fraud.

would arrive at?

have committed large-scale fraud are fraudsters.

smart, like you.

persuasive statements.

I don't think any of us does

They would probably think that I should, with a

certain amount of detachment, assess these facts, call them

exactly as they are. no more and no less, and design a

proportionate sentence, -which is what I'll do, to the best of

(,t-

inventors and propounders of the scheme made money.

So I've had a lot of people stand in front of me who

And I think it's fair to say people who

Most or them

Most of them — many of them able to make

But because they are who they are, and because

they've done what they've done, and because things have worked

my ability, without undue — without any sense of vengeance,

for them the way they have worked for them, it's difficult to

because that has no place in the law, but also without any lack

believe a thing they say.

of determination or like to see to it that these types of scams

are deterred, if possible, suppressed where possible, and

truth.

I know that some of them probably are telling me the

I'm certain that many of them aren't.

I have no

rightly punished where possible, because there's the tears and

100-percent reliable way to tell one from the other, but I will

heartbreak and misery all over between every <-.-ro lines in this

tell you this.

presentence report.

polished fraudster, as any experienced jurist would be, as any

the facts.

experienced law enforcement officer or investigator would be,

- ■

as any experienced defense lawyer would be, "more suspicious of

It just oozes out to those of us who know

Again, oozing being a technical term.

-And

I want to say something else to you,

I am much more suspicious of a statement from a

: b

Mr. Jghedoise.

a polished and savvy fraudster who understands human emotions

I've sentenced a lot of cases that involved using the term in

and vulnerabilities enough to exploit them successfully time

its broadest, most generic sense, fraud, some of it generated

after time after time.

by organized crime, some of it generated by a couple people who

think they have a bright idea, sometimes economically proves

this, I will say that I have seen — although I’ve seen

successful for a while.

examples of every, I think, form of conduct after arrest, I

successful and I don't know about them.

would say there's a discernible tendency for defendants who are/

that prove successful for a while, if success means chat the

crafty to understand exactly what they should do during their

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

I've been doing this a good, long time, and

I assume there are ones that prove

But I know about a lot

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT.

Again, without making any finding with respect to

;

who are both criminals and drug addicts, certainly abusers,

Again, I can't tell — I know there are some who — I 'f

sometimes it's difficult to know whether the stress and strain

incarceration to prepare not for a life, but for sentencing,

know there are legitimate examples of persons who experienced

of a criminal life created a need to medicate the stress with

remorse and a sort of self-actuated rehabilitation, and I know 'f

the drugs, or whether these drugs clouded the judgment and

created a need for money and induced crime,

very tight relationship,

one, cases of the other, often very difficult to tell which is

starling before you.

there are people who are seemingly incorrigible fraudsters and

manipulators.

Again, I — even though I know there are

examples of both, I don't have any ironclad way to tell the

difference between one and the other.

And basing that decision on using the term, again, in

It's certain!

I'm sure there are, again, cases of

And difficult to know, even that, how much difference

its sort of generalized sense, personality, is dangerous,

it makes how an offender got to be an offender, if that

especially with fraudsters, because they're very persuasive

offender is an offender and if released into the community is

generally.

It's how they came to be — how they came to be

likely to offend.

successful.

They've been recruiting cohorts and targeting

victims.

So I consider, as I was saying, the nature and

Victims tend not to care about the details of why

someone broke their life, broke their heart, stole their money.

ended their dreams, for instance, devastated their child.

They

characteristics of the offense and the nature and

tend not to care

characteristics of the offender, I'll just say summarily that

sitting right there, none of them will care either.

having a difficult childhood, upbringing, environment, as a

society to be placid, l:,»ful, an I safe.

While it can

to be told, we're not doing a very good job of accomplishing

be said that many offenders have difficult backgrounds and were

that.

handed a difficult lot in life, by far, the most people who

So, yes, I have considered the nature and

ware handed difficult lot in life are not offenders.

characteristics of the offense, and I've read carefully your

youth, is certainly not uncommon among offenders.

Probably if I had 535 members of Congress

They want

And lest anybody no

And establishing an element of causation between a

background that is before me in the writings and in the

circumstance and a crime is not an easy thing to do at all.

statements made this morning on your behalf.

For instance, just to take an obvious example, how many people

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

I also consider other matters, including the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

imposition of a judgment that enhances respect for the law.

deterrence might have a greater effect is where people plan,

Just a word about that.

where people assess the means by which they will proceed, place

means different things to different people.

that they will proceed, targets that they will approach, the

things I thin'-, it rightly means '.s that the sentence should not

type of personnel they need to recruit in order to effect their

be so great as to be viewed as unnecessarily punitive without

means, and in which it is possible to calculate a probable

reason, nor should it be, as I said a few minutes ago, so

range of monetary return so that a reasonable person, such as

lenient or indy ".gent as to sugges4- that the severity of the

yourself, who's literate and can assess risk and reward, and,

crime has not been recognized, that the injury to the victims

of course, probability of apprehension, which is important,

has not been recognized, or that society is not sincere in

might decide, yes, given X, risk of apprehension, and Y,

enforcing its prohibitions.

vulnerability to incarceration, and, Z, reward, that equation

works for me and I'll commit the crime.

It means — that concept probably

But one of the

I also consider protection for the community.

think it — strike the I think part.

the community is a principal consideration in every criminal

case.

Manifestly protection for

changing one of those variables.

incarceration variable is changeable right here, right now in a

particular case is one that randomly targeted the community,

way that will make this equation not work for others.

and in this case and in related cases, did so broadly

That is especially so if the offense of conviction in a

fancy way of expressing the common-sense notion that people

have committed about the same offense, have about the same

criminal background, have caused about the same damage, should

extent, and if so, in which categories of cases, assuming that.

get about the same sentence.

perhaps it is more effective.

and generalized it a little bit too much, but that's

component of sentencing in some categories of cases than

essentially what it means.

others.

I also consider deterrence.

That is a statutory

factor.

it is an effective aspect of sentencing.

I also consider the unwarranted — the avoidance of

unwarranted disparity, an the lawyers tend to say.

i 23

And, of course, that

Well, you know, you can change that equation by

throughout the United States, and I1t think we know in Canada.

.. 21

There are always arguments about deterrence, whether

If so, to what

Deterrence is a more effective

I think it's fair to say that one area in which

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

It's "a

Yeah, I've simplified it a bit

One need not look too far, whether it's the

Sentencing Commission's aggregated data or elsewhere in this

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

case and in related cases to see that the range of sentences

courtroom who is a victim and wants to be heard, I'll — if

that we are talking about here is not excessive.

I actually

you'll make your presence known, I'll give you that opportunity

had occasion to review all the sentences and all the related

now.

cases before coming here this morning, and I think the judges

in the Middle District of Florida have together sentenced these

cases in an admirably consistent and moderate manner.

So anyway, Mr. Ighedoise, I've considered all of

that, which is not an easy thing to do, nor is it an exact

thing to do.

matters that have been brought to my attention.

other hand, I don't want to forget other matters that have —

Some of these sentences are lengthy.

One is

There's no response to that, so I just want to make

sure I dotted that I _nd crossed that T, as the

tantamount to a life sentence.

be a life sentence.

who provided the earliest, most useful substantial assistance

to the United States has a sentence, which if that fact were

that I mentioned.

not known, would appear to be disparate.

deserve to be thought of as we do what we do.

is adjusted for a decision that the United States Congress and

the Sentencing Commission made, which is to reward, as a matter *

One might or might not prove to -

Several others are lengthy.

The person

But whr.-. the sentence ,

were.

I want to, in sentencing you, recognize the

But on the

There are people who are not here who

So I have, pursuant to 18 — well, to the Sentencing

Reform Act of 1984, to the extent applicable, after the United

of United States policy, substantial assistance, that sentence /

States v. Booker and pursuant to 18 U.S.C

fits perfectly in line with the others.

that Akohomen Ighedoise be committed to the Bureau of Prisons

factors out, and it all works.

for 210 months.

Just adjust those

So, actually, not that it's my place to do this, but

3553, determined

I have varied upwards slightly because of the

reasons I have stated earlier.

I was pleased with the results from a sentencing standpoint

this series of crimes, the startling breadth and reach of the

of — in the matter of consistency and balance.

crime, and the other factors that I discussed and need not

limit but summarized them now.

I should note that I did not ask if there were any

victims present in the courtroom.

that is self-evidently no.

didn't make that invitation.

think that's not possible, if there's any person in the

The rampant injury caused by

I believe that tne answer to

So I did not exercise in that — I

necessary to establish — to advance the statutory purpose of

But if I'm wrong about that and I

sentencing and in context of this offense is altogether

reasonable.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

I am confident that that sentence is not greater than

I have no objection, and I ttink justi'e would

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

*•

served, given the sentence that I have announced, that

Mr. Ighedoise receive full credit from the time of his initial

in the United States courts, people who violate the terras of

detention in Canada on related charges.

supervision, it's not ignored.

Mr. Trombley, that would be 108 months.

They often are brought back into court and are subject to being

returned to incarceration for a term, sometimes amounting to

I — the date is October 7th, 2015.

years.

THE COURT:

MR. TROMBLEY:

THE COURT:

18 months that we discussed.

receiving credit for that.

receive credit for that as I calculated this sentence.

MR. TROMBLEY:

correct.

And if I'm correct,

Your Honor, I don't think that's

All right.

I'm not sure what —

Anyway, the full measure, including the

I have no objection to his

And my expectation is that he will

And just so you will not be surprised, Mr. Ighedoise,

It's not considered trivial.

As a qualifying felon, the defendant must cooperate

in the collection of his DNA as directed by the probation

officer.

Madam officer, has that been accomplished?

THE PROBATION OFFICER:

I have not verified, Your

Honor, but —

THE COURT:

Upon release, the defendant must serve a three-year

14 ■

term of supervision in which he must comply with the standard

confirm that that DNA has been taken, and if not, to take it

conditions adopted in the Court — by the Court in the Middle

yourself.

District of Florida and as well the following special

make sure that gets done.

cond'' irons:

you know, in cases involving persons from outside the United

States.

With all due respect, you are directed to

I suggest you take it yourself anyway, but let's

That's particularly important, as

First, he must not incur new credit charges, open

lines of credit, or obligating himself for a major purchase

without advanced approval by the probation officer.

.21

Second, he must provide the probation officer access

to any requested financial information.

And, third, if he's deported, and I think that is a

Mandatory drug testing requirements of the Violent

Crime Control Act are suspended.

The defendant must pay restitution in the amount of

$4,389,340.97 to the victims as provided — as delineated by

;

the government, by the United States,

near eventuality, he must not reenter the United States without

payable to the clerk of the United States District Court for

the express permission of the United States.

the Middle District of Florida for distribution to the victims.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

;

■ Zi

. .. .’ 23

;

This restitution is.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Restitution shall be paid jointly and severally with

ccdefendants, Ikechukwu — that's Amadi, isn’t it?

job.

Upon release from custody, the defendant must pay

MR. SCRUGGS:

Yes, sir.

restitution at the rate of $200 a month at any time after his

THE COURT:

Derek Amadi?

release, of course.

MR. SCRUGGS:

his ability to pay, that monthly payment rate is changeable

the Court.

interest, and I will waive the interest payment for the

restitution.

THE COURT:

Yes.

Priscilla Ann Ellis/ Perry Don Cortese,n>°J

Stacey Merritt, and Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson.

Further restitution is jointly and severally payable

with coconspirators Muhammad Naji in Case 15-Criminal-126.

me restate that.

Middle District of Florida.

Let

And in the event of a material change in

I find the defendant lacks the ability to pay

I'll also waive — well, does the United States want

to be heard on a fine?

MR. SCRUGGS:

No, Your Honor.

8:16-Criminal-149 in the Middle District of Florida, Michele

THE COURT:

Seems superfluous.

Ann Scalley in Case 8:16-Criminal-259 in the Middle District of

MR. SCRUGGS:

Yes, Your Honor.

Florida, Tampa Division.

THE COURT:

Dean Morgan in Case 8:17-Criminal-254 in the Middle District of

MR. SCRUGGS:

Florida, Frederick Miscoe in Cas(e 8:18-Criminal-13 in the

Middle District of Florida, and Okechukwu Desmond Amadi in case

8:17-Criminal-447.

preliminary order of forfeiture ar. Document 1141 of the docket.

While in the Bureau of Prisons, the defendant must

Tnat preliminary order is made permanent and will be

either pay at least $25 quarterly, if he has a UNICOR job or

incorporated into the judgment and commitment.

50 percent of his monthly earnings — I got that exactly

backwards.

in the Bureau of Prisons' custody, the defendant must pay

For the reasons that I have already stated, I find

either, one, $25 quarterly if he has a nonUNICOR job, pay at

the sentence to be entirely reasonable in the circumstances.

least 50 percent of his monthly earnings if he has a UNICOR

In Case Number 8:15-Criminal-126 in the

Dana Marie Jewesak in Case Number

All these are Tampa Division cases.

Sorry, Mr. [sic] Reporter.

I'll begin with while

And otherwise we probably go 250.

Correct, Your Honor.

for the fine.

THE COURT:

Seems superfluous.

There is a

I levied a special assessment of $100, which is due

immediately.

Count 2 of the superseding indictment is dismissed \ .

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

rA !(C

'fUj Cud’l- (1

'-'T'

C'+

-KJ< ,^r i.u''

vJW

■

a;:-11'"'

... (.,/<

We're ,ot asking

vd io)

accord with the plea agreement and the underlying indictment.

MR. SCRUGGS:

original indictment.

THE COURT:

difference.

■

Yes, he was not included in the

That's correct.

Doesn't make any

All right.

Does counsel for the United States or the defense

MR. TROMBLEY:

THE COURT:

That, I think, is where he —

All right.

I'll recommend that he be

housed at Fort Dix, New Jersey or another facility where he can

engage in gainful employment.

In your plea agreement, you have largely waived your

right to appeal from this judgment and sentence except in three

obje.t to.the sentence or the manner of its announcement?

circumstances, one of which has occurred here, which is I

Mr. Scruggs?

sentenced you above the applicable Guideline range,

have a right of appeal.

MR. SCRUGGS:

THE COURT:

MR. TROMBLEY:

No, Your Honor.

Mr. Trombley?

Nothing more, other

than what's in our memorandum and what's been said here today.

THE COURT:

No, Your Honor.

So you do

So with respect to that appeal, there are two things

I need to tell you.

Number one, you — in a direct appeal you always have

The defendant is remanded to the custody

a right to counsel.

of the United States Marshal to await designation by the Bureau

appoint one for you at public expense.

of Prisons.

Mr. Trombley must preserve and pursue any appeal unless other

Was there a request with respect to his residence?

counsel is substituted for him by an order of the Court.

If you can't afford counsel, I would

As it stands now.

The thing that occurs 4o me first, does he want to make sure

he's either with or away from any of the codefendants?

written notice of appeal that is filed within 14 days, and that

a factor here?

is accompanied by a filing fee.

fee, Mr. Trombley can ask the Court to waive the fee, and if

that’s granted, he can appeal without payment.

. 20

MR. SCRUGGS:

Is that

No, Your Honor, it should not be at

this point from the government's perspective.

MR. TROMBLEY:

Your Honor, we've — he's pretty open

to different facilities.

I've suggested a lot of people have

found success ’working at Fort Di.x in New Jersey.

THE COURT:

That's right.

Number two, to begin an appeal, you must file a"

If you cannot afford a filing

Mr. Trombley, I think it would be advisable here for

you to file a notice of appeal and —

MR. TROMBLEY:

Your Honor, with all due respect,

we've — he's inquired about what would happen in the event of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5 .jL

\ OVN

'V<t

V -

■fi •

(

ry"

I think that's

being outside and over the Guideline range.

probably likely that he is going to want to file an appeal.

STATE OF FLORIDA

had planned on asking and moving the Court to appoint an

COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH

appellate —

COURT:

Please do the same.

the

to waive the filing fee.

Just make a motion

I guess he can't pay it.

Is that

right?

MR. TROMBLEY:

THE COURT:

Correct.

So make a motion co waive the filing fee

and to — for substitution of appellate counsel.

MR. TROMBLEY:

THE COURT:

CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER

Okay.

And the magistrate judge will take care

of that.

MR. TROMBLEY:

THE COURT:

MR. SCRUGGS:

THE COURT:

MR. TROMBLEY:

THE COURT:

Understood, Your Honor.

Anything further from the United States?

No, Your Honor.

Thank you.

Anything further from the defense?

Nothing, Your Honor.

We are in adjournment.

(Proceedings adjourned at 10:40 a.m.)

Thank you.

that I was authorized to and did stenographically report thc

foregoing proceedings; and that the foregoing pages constitute

a true and complete computer-aided transcription of my original

stenographic notes to the best of my knowledge, skill, and

ability.

I further certify that I am not a relative, employee,

attorney, or counsel of any of the parties, nor am I a relative

or employee of any of the parties' attorneys or counsel

connected with the action, nor am I financially interested in

the action.

Hillsborough County, Florida, this 13th day of March 2023.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto rat my hand at Tampr.

I, Rebekah M. Lockwood, RDR, CRR, do hereby certify

REBEKAH M. LOCKWOOD, RDR, CRR

Official Court Reporter

United States District Court

Middle District of Florida

APPENDIX C

L'.

USCA11 Case: 23-10

Document: 37-2

Date Filed: 0

2024

Page: 1 of 2

3ln tFjc

Mntfefr States Court of Appeals

lor % HEtontl} (Etmni

No. 23-10270

UNITED STATES OF AMERIC A,

Plain tiff-Appellee,

versus

AKOi lOMEN IGHEDOISE,

D efendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00320-SDM-MRM-l

ON PETITION(S) FOR REHEARING AND PETITION(S) FOR

REHEARING EN BANC

USCA11 Case: 23-10

Document: 37-2

Date Filed: 0

2024

Order of the Court

Page: 2 of 2

23-10270

Before Jordan, Newsom, and Anderson, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED, no judge in

regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court

be polled on rehearing en banc. FRAP 35. The Petition for Panel

Rehearing also is DENIED. FRAP 40.

USCA11 Case: 23-10

Document: 38-2

Date Filed: 0

Page: 1 of 2

Iln tfye

Mrntefr

fflnurt nf iVppBafe

3for fyfi lElElicntfi (Etrnrif

No. 23-10270

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

AKOHOMENIGHEDOISE,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00320-SDM-MRM-l

JUDGMENT

USCA11 Case: 23-10

Document: 38-2

Date Filed: 0

2024

Page: 2 of 2

23-10270

It is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the opinion is

sued on this date in this appeal is entered as the judgment of this

Court.

Entered: January 29, 2024

For the Court: David J. Smith, Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS MANDATE: April 15, 2024

a XIQNSdtdV

No. 23-10270

3dn tfje 33niteb States Court of Appeals

for tlje Clcbcntf) Circuit

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Document

Tab

Docket sheet

Superseding indictment

Plea agreement

1121

Minute entry

1126

Consent to plea before magistrate judge

1127

Consent to PSR.

1128

Report and recommendation.

1129

Acceptance of plea

1132

Sentencing memorandum

1144

Minute entry

1149

Judgment

1150

Notice of appeal

1153

Plea transcript

1165

Sentencing transcript.

1167

AKOHOMEN IGHEDOISE,

Defendant-Appellant.

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division

Case No. 8:15-cr-320, Hon. Steven D. Merryday

APPENDIX ON APPEAL OF AKOHOMEN IGHEDOISE

VOLUME ONE OF ONE

Thomas A. Burns

BURNS, P.A.

301 West Platt Street, Suite 137

Tampa, FL 33606

(813) 642-6350

tburns@burnslawpa.com

Court-appointed counsel for

Akohomen Ighedoise

Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Court - Middle District of Florida

6/29/23, 4:59 PM

APPEAL, CLOSED, CUSTODY, SL DOC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I filed the original and lwo copies of this

U.S. District Court

Middle District of Florida (Tampa)

CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE#: 8:15-cr-00320-SDM-MRM-l

appendix with the Clerk of Court via CM/ECF and regular mail on this

Case title: USA v. Ighedoise et al

5th day of July, 2023, to:

Date Filed: 08/20/2015

Date Terminated: 01/20/2023

David J. Smith, Clerk of Court

U.S. Court of Appeals for the

Eleventh Circuit

56 Forsyth Street N.W.

Atlanta, GA 30303

Assigned to: Judge Steven D. Merryday

Referred to: Magistrate Judge Mac R.

McCoy

Appeals court case number: 23-I0270-D

11th Circuit

I FURTHER CERTIFY that I served a true and correct copy of the

Defendant CD

foregoing brief via CM/ECF on this 5th day of July, 2023, to:

United States

Akohomen Ighedoise

TERMINATED: 01/20/2023

AUSA Holly Gershow

represented by Thomas A. Burns

Burns, PA

301 W Platt St Ste 137

Tampa, FL 33606-2292

813/642-6350

Fax: 813/642-6350

Email: tburns@burnslawpa.com

I FURTHER CERTIFY that I served a true and correct copy of the

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Designation: CJA Appointment

foregoing brief via electronic mail on this 5th day of July, 2023, to:

Wesley E. Trombley

Trombley & Hanes

707 N. Franklin Street, 10th Floor

Tampa, FL 33602

813/229-7918

Fax: 813/223-5204

Email:

wtrombley@trombleyhaneslaw.com

TERMINATED: 01/18/2023

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Designation: CJA Appointment

Akohomen Ighedoise (74906-509)

USP Atlanta

601 McDonough Boulevard, S.E.

Atlanta, GA 30315

July 5, 2023

/s/ Thomas Burns

Thomas A. Burns

Pending Counts

Disposition

18:1349.F ATTEMPT AND

CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MAIL

Imprisonment: 210 months; Supervised

Release: 3 years; Fine: Waived; Special

https://ecf.Mmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl7en833574770776-L_1_0-1

Page 1 of 17

6/29/23, 4:59 PM

Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Court - Middle District of Florida

FRAUD

(1)

Orlando, FL 32804-6400

407-898-5151

Fax: 407-S98-2468

Email; mark@markomaralaw.com

LEAD ATTORNEY

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Designation: Retained

Assessment: $100;

Restitution^,389,340.97

Highest Offense Level (Opening)

Felony

Terminated Counts

Disposition

18:1956-7477.F LAUNDERING OF

MONETARY INSTRUMENTS

Dismissed on motion by the United States

(2)

Movant

Preston Leonard Schofield

Hiphest Offense Level (Terminated!

Felony

Complaints

None

Plaintiff

Claimant

represented by Victoria Ellis

3418 Castleton Drive

Killeen, TX 76542

PROSE

Claimant

State of Texas County of Bell

represented by Harvey M. Allen

McCreary. Veselka, Bragg & Allen, P.C.

P.O.Box 1269

Round Rock, TX 78680

512-323-3200

LEAD ATTORNEY

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Designation: Retained

https://ecf.flmd.uscoufts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl7811833574770776-L_1_0-1

represented by Matthew Jackson

US Attorney's Office - FLM

Suite 3200

400 N Tampa St

Tampa, FL 33602

813/301-3083

Fax: 813/274-6125

Email: matt.jackson@usdoj.gov

TERMINATED: 11/10/2015

LEAD ATTORNEY

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Designation: Retained

Patrick Scruggs

US Attorney's Office - FLM

Suite 3200

400 N Tampa St

Tampa, FL 33602

813-274-6034

Email: patrick.scruggs@usdoj.gov

LEAD ATTORNEY

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Designation: Retained

Movant

Mark M. O'Mara

represented by Preston Leonard Schofield

1703 South Roy Reynolds Drive

Killeen, TX 76543

PROSE

Disposition

USA

Victoria Ellis

TERMINATED: 0711712018

6/29/23, 4:59 PM

Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Court - Middle District of Florida

Amanda C. Kaiser

US Attorney's Office - FLM

Suite 3200

400 N Tampa St

represented by Mark M. O'Mara

O'Mara Law Group

Ste 200

221 NE Ivanhoe Blvd

Page 2 of 17

https://ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl7811833574770776-L_1_0-1

Page 3 of 17

Electronic Casu Filing | U.S. District Court - Middle District ol Florida

6/29/23, 4:59 PM

Tampa, FL 33602-4798

813/274-6000

Fax: 813/274-6103

Emai I: TPA DOCKET.Mai 1 box @ usdoj. aov

TERMINATED: 09/2912016

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Eric Gerard

US Attorney's Office - FLM

Suite 3200

400 N Tampa St'

Tampa, FL 33602-4798

813-301-3083

Email: TPADOCKET.Mailbox@usdoj.gov

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Holly L. Gershow

US Attorney's Office - FLM

Suite 3200

400 N Tampa St

Tampa, FL 33602

813/274-6000

Email: holly.gershow@usdoj.gov

TERMINATED: 07/01/2016

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Julie A. Simonsen

United States Attorney s Office

400 N. Tampa Street., Suite 3200

Tampa, FL 33602

813-301-3067

Email: julie.simonsen@usdoj.gov

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Suzanne C. Nebesky

US Attorney's Office - FLM

Suite 3200

400 N Tampa St

'I ampa.FL 33602-4798

6/29/23, 4:59 PM

813/274-6000

Emai I: suzanne .nebesky @ usdoj .gov

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date F iled

It-

09/24/2015

22 ♦♦♦UNSEALED PER ORDER 1016*** SEALED MOTION to Seal by USA as to

Docket Text

Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek Amadi, Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don

Cortese, Stacey Merritt, Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson. (AMD) Modified on 7/29/2021

(CTR). (Entered: 09/28/2015)

09/24/2015

♦♦♦UNSEALED PER ORDER 1016***ORDER SEALED granting 23 Sealed

Motion as to Akohomen Ighedoise (1), Ikechukwu Derek Amadi (2), Priscilla

Ann Ellis (3), Perry Don Cortese (4), Stacey Merritt (5), Kenietta Rayshawn

Johnson (6). Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on 9/24/2015. (AMD)

Modified on 7/29/2021 (CTR). (Entered: 09/28/2015)

09/24/2015

SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT returned in open court as to Akohomen Ighedoise

(1) count(s) 1,2, Ikechukwu Derek Amadi (2) count(s) 1,2. Priscilla Ann Ellis (3)

count(s) Is. 2s, Perry Don Cortese (4) count(s) Is. 2s, Stacey Merritt (5) count(s) I,

2, Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson (6) count(s) 1,2. (AMD) (Entered: 09/28/2015)

09/24/2015

♦♦♦UNSEALED PER ORDER 1016*** Arrest Warrant Issued as to Akohomen

Ighedoise. (AMD) Modified on 7/29/2021 (CTR). (Entered: 09/28/2015)

09/28/2015

Jillian M. Jewell

US Attorney's Office - FLM

Suite 3200

400 N Tampa St

Tampa, FL 33602-4798

Email: jillian.jewell@usdoj.gov

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

https:/,-4cl.Nmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pi78l1833574770776-C_1_0-1

Electronic Cere Filing | U.S. District Court - Middle District of Florida

Sealed Documents S-23 to S-28. (AMD) (Entered: 09/28/2015)

10/14/2015

BILL of particulars as to Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Akohomen

Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek Amadi, Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson, Stacey Merritt.

(Gershow, Holly) (Entered: 10/14/2015)

10/15/2015

STATUS REPORT for October 2015 by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu

Derek Amadi, Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Stacey Merritt, Kenietta

Rayshawn Johnson (Jackson, Matthew) (Entered: 10/15/2015)

11/03/2015

NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Patrick Scruggs appearing for USA.

(Scruggs, Patrick) (Entered: 11/03/2015)

11/10/2015

Notice of substitution of AUSA. Patrick Scruggs substituting for Matthew Jackson.

(Scruggs, Patrick) (Entered: 11/10/2015)

11/12/2015

STATUS REPORT November by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek

Amadi, Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Stacey Merritt, Kenietta Rayshawn

Johnson (Scruggs, Patrick! (Entered: 11/12/2015)

11/13/2015

■ 19

US Marshal 285 form for Execution of SW/Check Deposit. Remarks: $130,692.08

USC deposited on 10/9/15. (AMD) (Entered: 11/16/2015)

11/13/2015

S2 US Marshal 285 form for Execution of SW/Check Deposit. Remarks: $64,584.25

11/13/2015

Si US Marshal 285 form for Execution of SW/Check Deposit. Remarks: $7,083.08 USC

USC deposited on 10/9/15. (AMD) (Entered: 11/16/2015)

Page 4 of 17

https://ecf.flmd_.uscourt5.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpi.pl7611833574770776-L_1_0-l

;

Page 5 of 17

Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Court - Middle District of Florida

6/29/23, 4:59 PM

Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Court - Midale District of Flor. j

Amadi, Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Stacey Merritt, Kenietta Rayshawn

Johnson (Scruggs, Patrick) (Entered: 04/08/2016)

deposited on 10/9/15. (AMD) (Entered: 11/16/2015)

11/13/2015

US Marshal 285 form for Execution of SW/Check Deposit. Remarks: $21,837.89

USC deposited on 10/9/15. (AMD) (Entered: 11/16/2015)

04/29/2016

US Marshal 285 form for Execution of SW/Check Deposit. Remarks: $207,583.45

USC was deposited on 10/9/15. (AMD) (Entered: 11/16/2015)

21.7. MOTION for immediate Monsanto Hearing by Victoria Ellis.(AMD) Motions

referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. (Entered: 04/29/2016)

05/10/2016

234

06/09/2016

276 STATUS REPORT June 2016 by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek

Amadi, Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Stacey Merritt, Kenietta Rayshawn

Johnson (Scruggs, Patrick) (Entered: 06/09/2016)

06/10/2016

277

SUPPLEMENT re 276 Status Report June by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoi.

Ikechukwu Derek Amadi, Priscilla Ann Ellis. Perry Don Cortese, Stacey Me

Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson (Attachments: # I Exhibit Monthly Update from

Priscilla Ellis and Mailing envelope)(Scruggs, Patrick) (Entered: 06/10/2016)

11/13/2015

US Marshal 285 form for Execution of SW/Check Deposit. Remarks: $19,985.00

USC deposited on 10/9/15. (AMD) (Entered: 11/16/2015)

11/13/2015

US Marshal 285 form for Execution of SW/Check Deposit. Remarks: $55,797.69

USC deposited on 10/9/15. (AMD) (Entered: 11/16/2015)

12/11/2015

STATUS REPORT December by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek

Amadi, Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Stacey Merritt, kenietta Rayshawn

Johnson (Scruggs, Patrick) (Entered: 12/11/2015)

01/04/2016

100 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Eric Gerard appearing for USA. CoCounsel (Gerard, Eric) (Entered: 01/04/2016)

01/08/2016

101

01/08/2016

01/14/2016

102

107

o/29/23, 4:59 PM

STATUS REPORT May 2016 by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek

Amadi, Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Stacey Merritt, Kenietta Rayshawn

Johnson (Scruggs, Patrick) (Entered: 05/10/2016)

06/30/2016

295

Joint MOTION to continue trial by Perry Don Cortese as to Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry

Don Cortese, Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek Amadi, Kenietta Rayshawn

Johnson, Stacey Merritt. (Maddux, Michael) (Entered: 01/08/2016)

Notice of substitution of AUSA. Amanda C. Kaiser substituting for Holly L.

Gershow. (Kaiser, Amanda) (Entered: 06/30/2016)

07/08/2016

300

STATUS REPORT by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek Amadi,

Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Stacey Merritt, Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson

(Scruggs, Patrick) (Entered: 01/08/2016)

STATUS REPORT and Exhibit A by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu

Derek Amadi, Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Stacey Merritt, Kenietta

Rayshawn Johnson (Scruggs, Patrick) (Entered: 07/08/2016)

08/09/2016

339 STATUS REPORT August 2016 by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu

Derek Amadi, Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Stacey Merritt, Kenietta

Rayshawn Johnson (Scruggs, Patrick) (Entered: 08/09/2016)

08/18/2016

342

NOTICE OF TRIAL as to Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Akohomen

Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek Amadi, Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson, and Stacey

Merritt: Jury Trial set for 10/3/2016 at 01:30 PM in Tampa Courtroom 15A before

Judge Steven D. Merryday. (LAM) (Entered: 08/18/2016)

ORDER granting J01 motion to continue trial as to Akohomen Ighedoise,

Ikechukwu Derek Amadi, Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Stacey

Merritt, and Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson. Jury Trial continued to the October

2016 trial calendar in Tampa Courtroom 15A before Judge Steven D. Merryday.

Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 1/14/2016. (LAM) (Entered: 01/14/2016)

02/09/2016

123

STATUS REPORT by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek Amadi,

Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Stacey Merritt, Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson

(Scruggs, Patrick) (Entered: 02/09/2016)

09/12/2016

373

STATUS REPORT Joint, September 2016 by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise,

Ikechukwu Derek Amadi, Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Stacey Merritt,

Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson (Scrugg', Patrick) (Entered: 09/12/2016)

03/10/2016

143

STATUS REPORT by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek Amadi,

Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Stacey Merritt, Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson

(Scruggs, Patrick) (Entered: 03/10/2016)

09/14/2016

377

03/16/2016

146 NOTICE of Similar Cases by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek

Amadi, Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Stacey Merritt, Kenietta Rayshawn

Johnson (Scruggs, Patrick) (Entered: 03/16/2016)

MOTION to allow electronic equipment, specifically iPad tablet computer

comparable by USA as to Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Akohomen^^^P

Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek Amadi, Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson, Stacey Me^^n

(Scruggs, Patrick) (Entered: 09/14/2016)

09/15/2016

390 ENDORSED ORDER denying 343 the motion by Perry Don Cortese (4) to

continue the trial. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 9/15/2016. (Entered:

09/15/2016)

09/16/2016

394 NOTICE of Filing Declaration of Authentication of Business Records by USA as to

Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek Amadi, Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don

Cortese, Stacey Merritt. Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)

(Scruggs, Patrick) (Entered: 09/16/2016)

03/28/2016

04/08/2016

161

ENDORSED ORDER denying 153 the motion to dismiss by Priscilla Ann Ellis

(3) for, among other reasons, the several good and sufficient reasons explained in

the response (Doc. 155) of the United States. Signed by Judge Steven D.

Merryday on 3/28/2016. (Entered: 03/28/2016)

190 | STATUS REPORT April 2016 by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek

hitps://ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bln/Dktftpt.pl?811833S74770776-L_1_0-1

Page 6 of 17

https://ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?8n83357il770776-L_l_0-1

Page 7 of 17

Electronic Case Filing j U.S. District Court - Middle District of Florida

09/16/2016

6/29/lo, 4:59 PM

396 ORDER granting 377-motion by the United States to allow Ms. Jennifer Brown

to bring an iPad into the courthouse beginning 10/3/2016 until the final day of

trial. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 9/16/2016. (BK) (Entered:

09/16/2016)

09/192016

402

09/22/20 !'j

419 bUPPLEMF.N‘1 re 394 Nor, ce of Filing Declaration of Authentication of Business

Records by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek Amadi, Priscilla Ann

Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Stacey Merritt, Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson (Attachments:

# 1 Exhibit l)(Scruggs, Patrick) Modified link & text on 9/22/2016 (AMD). (Entered:

09/22/2016)

450

Notice of substitution of AUSA. Suzanne C. Nebesky substituting for Amanda C.

Kaiser. (Nebesky, Suzanne) (Entered: 09/29/2016)

458 ENDORSED ORDER denying 429 the motion by Priscilla Ann Ellis (3) for

severance and other relief from allegedly "prejudicial joinder." Signed by Judge

Steven D. Merryday on 10/2/2016. (Entered: 10/02/2016)

10/03/2016

471

10/03/2016

10/01

472

473

474

10/03/2016

♦“UNSEALED PER ORDER 1024*“F,XPARTE MOTION to Seal by USA as to

Priscilla Anr Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek

Amadi. Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson, Stacey Merritt. (AMD). Modified on 8/23/2021

(CTRJ. (Entered: 10/03/2016)

“♦UNSEALED PER ORDER 1024*“ ORDER granting 471 Expartc motion

for miscellaneous relief as to Akohomen Jghedoise (1), Ikechukwu Derek Amadi

(-J, Priscilla Ann Ellis (?\ l-’erry Don Cortese (4), Stacey Merritt. (5), Kenietta

Rayshawn Johnson (6). Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 10/2/2016.

(AMD) Modified on 8/23/2021 (CTR). (Entered: 10/03/2016)

♦“UNSEALED PER ORDER 1024“*EXPARTE MOTION to Compel Testimony

by USA as to Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Akohomen Ighedoise,

Ikechukwu Derek Amadi, Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson, Stacey Merritt. (AMD)

Modified on 8/23/2021 (CTR). (Entered: 10/03/2016)

♦♦♦UNSEALED PER ORDER 1024“* ORDER granting 473 Exparte motion

for miscellaneous relief as to Akohomen Ighedoise (1), Ikechukwu Derek Amadi

(2), Priscilla Ann Ellis (3), Perry Don Cortese (4), Stacey Merritt (5), Kenietta

Rayshawn Johnson (6). Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 10/2/2016.

(AMD) Modified on 8/23/2.021 (CTR). 'Filtered: 10'O3/2016)

490 ORAL ORDER denying 4S1 motion to suppress as to Priscilla Ann Ellis. Signed

by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 10/3/2016. (LAM) (Entered: 10/03/2016)

10/03/2016

491

10/03/2016

492 ORAL ORDER denying 452 motion to for relief, specifically to "Include Witness

List" as to Priscilla Ann Ellis as a motion; accepting 452 as a witness list. Signed

by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 10/3/2016. (LAM) (Entered: 10/03/2016)

10/03/2016

493

ORAL ORDER denying without prejudice 412 motion in limine "to Suppress"

as to Priscilla Ann Ellis. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 10/3/2016.

(LAM) (Entered: 10/03/2016)

10/12/2016

50/

“♦TERMED - incorrectly filed as defendant not movant & should only be filed

under defendant Ellis.'hMOTION to adopt re 107 Order on motion to continue

trial , First MOTION to Quash Trial Subpoena by Mark M. O'Mara. Esquire by

Priscilla Ann Ellis as to Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Akohomen

Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek Amadi, Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson, Stacey Merritt.

tO'Mara, Mark) Modified on 10/12/2016 (AMD). (Entered: 10/12/2016)

10/17/2016

517 Proof of Service of subpoena as to Michelle Williams on 10/5/16. (AMD) (Entered10/17/2016)

10/18/2016

529 TRIAL BRIEF by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek Amadi,

Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Stacey Merritt, Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson

(Scruggs, Patrick) (Entered: 10/18/2016)

12/21/2016

590 ENDORSED ORDER granting 579 the motion by the United States to continue

the sentencing of Priscilla Ann Ellis (3), Perry Don Cortese (4), and Kenietta

Rayshawn Johnson (6). A separate order will re-schedule each sentencing.

Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 12/21/2016. (Entered: 12/21/2016)

12/21/2016

592 ENDORSED ORDER denying 587 the motion by stand-by counsel to Priscilla

Ann Ellis (3) for "calendar protection." Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on

12/21/2016. (Entered: 12/21/2016)

03/17/2017

625

03/17/2017

626 ENDORSED ORDER: For the reasons, among others, stated by the United

States in the response (Doc. 567), the 562 motion by Perry Don Cortese (4) for a

new trial is DENIED. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 3/17/2017.

(Entered: 03/17/2017)

Sealed Documents S-471 to S-474. (AMD) (Entered: 10/03/2U16)

485

ENDORSED ORDER: Priscilla Ann Ellis (3) moves to dismiss for improper

venue and for lack of jurisdiction. The motion 475 is DENIED. Signed by Judge

Steien D. Merryday on 10/3/2016. (Entered: 10/03/2016)

https://ecf.Mmd.uscourls.gov/cgi-bin/Dktftpt.pl28VI833574770776-lJ_0-1

Page 8 of 17

6/29/23, 4:59 PM

10/03/2016

NOTICE OF FILING DECLARATION OF AUTHENTICATION OF BUSINESS

RECORDS by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek Amadi, Priscilla

Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Stacey Merritt, Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson

(Attachments: #1 Exhibit l)(Scruggs, Patrick) (Entered: 09/19/2016)

10/02/2016

10/03/2016

Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Court - Middle District of Florida

ORAL ORDER denying as moot 426 motion for miscellaneous relief,

specifically to provide overhead projector to present trial exhibits" as to

Priscilla Ann Ellis. Doc.426 is construed as compliance with the exhibit list

requirement; to the extent that Doc. 426 requests the right to present trial'

exhibits, Doc. 426 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on

10/3/2016. (LAM) (Entered: 10/03/2016)

ENDORSED ORDER: Because a diligent reading and a thorough analysis of the

motion reveals no meritorious (or even plausible) argument for any of the

requested relief, the 557 motion by Priscilla Ann Ellis (3) for a new trial, a

directed verdict, or a judgment of acquittal is DENIED. Signed by Judge Steven

D. Merryday on 3/17/2017. (Entered: 03/17/2017)

https://ecf.Mmd.uscouris.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl2811833574770776-LJ_0-1

Page 9 of 17

Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Court - Middle District of Florida

04/04/2017

634

6/29/23, 4:59 PM

ENDORSED ORDER: Cortese's objection (Doc. 628) to a loss hearing before

the magistrate judge is construed as a motion to cancel the hearing. The United

States responds (Doc. 629). The construed 628 motion is GRANTED, and the

hearing is CANCELED. A separate order will schedule the hearing before the

district judge. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 4/4/2017. (Entered:

04/04/2017)

05/22/2017

664

NOTICE OF SIMILAR CASE by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek

Amadi, Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Stacey Merritt, Kenietta Rayshawn

Johnson (Scruggs, Patrick) (Entered: 05/22/2017)

09/21/2017

723

ENDORSED ORDER: Convicted on October 20,2016, Perry Don Cortese 717

moves based on a possible conflict with a civil trial to continue his sentencing,

scheduled for October 16,2017. The motion is DENIED. Signed by Judge Steven

D. Merryday on 9/21/2017. (Entered: 09/21/2017)

10/19/2017

760 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re order of compliance to Local Rule as to

Akohomen Ighedoise. Ikechukwu Derek Amadi, Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don

Cortese, Stacey Merritt, Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson by USA. Related case(s): yes

(Scruggs, Patrick) (Entered: 10/19/2017)

11/18/2017

785 ENDORSED ORDER: A 776 paper purportedly signed and filed pro se by

Victoria Ellis (but remarkably similar in tone, content, and appearance to many

frivolous and repetitive papers filed by the convicted defendant Priscilla Ellis)

requests the release of certain property subject to forfeiture. The United States

responds (Doc. 780) in a thorough and comprehensive opposition. For each

reason cited by the United States in opposition, the motion (Doc. 776) is

DENIED. (Entered: 11/18/2017)

01/05/2018

12/03/2020

01/11/2021

804

989 ORDER as to Akohomen Ighedoise: Pursuant to the Due Process Protections

Act, the Court confirms the United States' obligation to produce all exculpatory

evidence to the defendant pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963),

and its progeny and orders the United States to do so. Failing to do so in a

timely manner may result in consequences, including exclusion of evidence,

adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, and

sanctions. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 12/1/2020. (TDC) (Entered:

12/03/2020)

991

11/17/2021

11/18/2021

NOTICE of pendency of related cases re order of compliance to Local Rule as to

Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek Amadi, Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don

Cortese, Stacey Merritt, Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson by USA. Related case(s): yes

(Scruggs, Patrick) (Entered: 01/05/2018)

1055

Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Court - Middle District of Florida

ci/29/23, 4:59 PM

11/18/2021

1056 ORAL MOTION to Appoint Counsel, ORAL MOTION for Discovery, ORAL

MOTION for Medical Order by Akohomen Ighedoise. (KR) (Entered: 11/18/2021)

11/18/2021

1057

ORAL MOTION for Reciprocal Discovery, ORAL MOTION for Detention by USA

as to Akohomen Ighedoise. (KR) (Entered: 11/18/2021)

11/18/2021

1058

ORAL ORDER as to Akohomen Ighedoise: Pursuant to the Due Process

Protections Act, the Court confirms the United States' obligation to produce all

exculpatory evidence to the defendant pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S.

83 (1963), and its progeny and orders the United States to do so. Failing to do so

in a timely manner may result in consequences, including exclusion of evidence,

adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, and

sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Jenkins on ll/18/20^flKR )

(Entered: 11/18/2021)

___________________ ~________________

11/18/2021

1059 Minute Entry for in-person proceedings held before Magistrate Judge ElizabetlfA.

Jenkins: Oral Order granting 1056 Oral Motion to Appoint Counsel; Oral Order

granting 1056 Oral Motion for Discovery; Oral Order granting 1056 Oral Motion for

Medical Order; Oral Order granting 1057 Oral Motion for Reciprocal Discovery;

Oral Order granting 1057 Oral Motion for Detention by USA. Arraignment, Initial

Appearance, and Detention Hearing as to Akohomen Ighedoise held on 11/18/2021.

Defendant pled not guilty to all counts. (DIGITAL) (KR) (Entered: 11/18/2021)

11/18/2021

1060 Medical Order as to Akohomen Ighedoise (1). Signed by Magistrate Judge

Elizabeth A. Jenkins on 11/18/2021. (KR) (Entered:'! 1/18/2021)

11/19/2021

1062 ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL as to Akohomen Ighedoise.

Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Jenkins on 11/19/2021. (KR) (Entered:

11/19/2021)

11/19/2021

1063

ORAL ORDER of Appointment of CJA Counsel as to Akohomen Ighedoise:

Appointment of Attorney Wesley Trombley. Signed by Magistrate Judge

Elizabeth A. Jenkins on 11/18/2021. (KR) (Entered: 11/19/2021)

11/19/2021

1064

PRETRIAL discovery order and notice as to Akohomen Ighedoise. Jury Trial

set for trial term commencing 1/3/2022 before Judge Steven D. Merryday. Joint

status report due on or before the tenth of each month. Signed by Magisti^te

Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 11/18/2021. (DMS) (Entered: 11/19/2021)

11/19/2021

1065 Arrest Warrant Returned Executed on 11/17/2021 as to Akohomen Ighedoise^^^R)

(Entered: 11/19/2021)

12/09/2021

1069

ORDER as to Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Akohomen Ighedoise,

Ikechukwu Derek Amadi, Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson, Stacey Merritt;

NOTICE: COMPLIANCE WITH NEW LOCAL RULE 1.08. Signed by Judge

Steven D. Merryday on 1/11/2021. (BK) (Entered: 01/11/2021)

Unopposed MOTION to Continue trial by Akohomen Ighedoise. (Trombley, Wesley)

(Entered: 12/09/2021)

12/10/2021

1070

STATUS REPORT for December 2021 by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise (Scruggs,

Patrick) (Entered: 12/10/2021)

Arrest of Akohomen Ighedoise on 11/17/2021. (KR) (Entered: 11/18/2021)

12/14/2021

1071

ORDER granting 1069 Motion to Continue as to Akohomen Ighedoise (1) Jury

Trial set for February Trial Term before Judge Steven D. Merryday. Signed by

***CJA23 Financial Affidavit by Akohomen Ighedoise. (KR) (Entered: 11/18/2021)

https://ecf.fimd.uscoufts.gov/cgi-bin/OktRpt.pl7811833574770776-L_1_0-1

Page 10 of 17

https://ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgl-bin/OklRpt.pl78n833574770776-L_1_0-1

Page 11 of 17

Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Court - Middle District of Florida

6/29/23, d:S9 PM

Electronic C3se Filing | U.S. l.z net Court - Middle District of Florida

06/10/2022

1110

STATUS REPORT for June 2022 by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise (Scruggs,

Patrick) (Entered: 06/10/2022)

07/01/2022

1113

Case as to Priscilla Ann Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu

Derek Amadi, Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson, Stacey Merritt Reassigned to Magistrate

Judge Mac R. McCoy. New case number: 8:15-cr-320-SDM-MRM. Magistrate Judge

Thomas G. Wilson no longer assigned to the case. (JNB) (Entered: 07/01/2022)

01/10/2022

1078

STATUS REPORT for January 2022 by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise (Scruggs,

Patrick) (Entered: 01/10/2022)

01/12/2(^2

1080

Second MC> 1TON to Continue trial b. Akohomen Ighedoise. (Trombley, Wcsiey)

(Entered: 01/12/2022)

01/13/2022

1081

ORDER granting 1080 Motion to Continue as to Akohomen Ighedoise (1) Jury

IVial set for April 2022 Trial Term before Judge Steven D. Merryday. Signed by

Judge Steven D. Merryday nu 1/13/2072, iDAY) (Entered: 01/13/2022)

07/08/2022

1114 STATUS REPORT for July 2022 by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise (Scruggs

Patrick) (Entered: 07/08/2022)

IOSli STATUS REPORT for February 2022 by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise (Scruggs

07/14/2022

JLLL5 Unopposed MOTION to Continue trial by Akohomen Ighedoise. (Trombley Wesley)

02/10 'lull

(Entered: 07/14/2022)

Patrick) (Entered: 02/10/2022)

03/1

12S2 Unopposed MOTION to Continue trial by Akohomen Ighedoise. (Trombley Wesley)

07/18/2022

1117 ORDER granting U15 Motion to Continue as to Akohomen Ighedoise (1) Jury

Trial set September 2022 trial calendar.. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday

on 7/18/2022. (DAY) (Entered: 07/18/2022)

08/10/2022

1119 STATUS REPORT for August 2022 by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise (Scruggs,

Patrick) (Entered: 08/10/2022)

08/24/2022

1120 TRIAL CALENDAR for trial term September 2022 Signed by Judge Steven D.

Merryday on 8/24/2022. (DAY) (Entered: 08/24/2022)

08/30/2022

1121

I'LEA AGREEMENT re: cuunl(s) One of due Superseding Indictment as lo

Akohomen Ighedoise (Scruggs. Patrick) (Entered: 08/30/2022)

08/30/2022

1122

NOTICE OF HEARING as to Akohomen Ighedoise: Change of Plea Hearing set for

9/13/2022 at 01:30 PM in Tampa Courtroom 11 B before Magistrate Judge Mac R

McCoy. (FN) (Entered: 08/30/2022)

(Entered: 03/10/2022)

03/10/2022

1Q2Q STATUS RF.PORTfor March 2022 by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise (Scruggs

Patrick) (Entered: 03/10/2022)

03/10/2022

1091

STATUS REPORT/or March 2022 by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise (Scruggs,

Patrick) (Entered: 03/10/2022)

03/14/2022

1095

ORDER granting 1089 Motion to Continue as to Akohomen Ighedoise (1) Jury

Trial set for June 2022 Trial term before Judge Steven D. Merryday. Signed by

Judge Sloven D. Merryday on 3/14/2022. (DAY) (Entered: 03/14/2022)

04/07/2022

NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Jillian M. Jewell appearing for USA.

(Jewell, Ji11 ian) (Entered: 04/07/2022)

04/07/2022

1100

MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically to Substitute the Victim by USA as

to Priscilla ,\nn Ellis, Perry Don Cortese, Akohomen Ighedoise, Ikechukwu Derek

Amadi, Kenietta Rayshawn Johnson, Stacey Merritt. (Jewell, Jillian) (Entered04/07/2022)

08/31/2022

1123

Unopposed MOTION to Continue trial by Akohomen Ighedoise. (Trombley, Wesley)

(Entered: 08/31/2022)

09/06/2022

1125

ORDER granting 1100-motion to substitute victim; substituting B.S., N.L., and

K.N for Lorene Mae Sparks. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 4/7/2022.

(DAS) (Entered: 04/07/2022)

ORDER granting 1123 Motion to Continue as to Akohomen Ighedoise. Jury

Trial set for October 2022 trial term. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on

9/6/2022. (DAY) (Entered: 09/06/2022)

09/13/2022

1126

Minute Entry for In Person proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Mac R.

McCoy: Change of Plea Hearing as to Akohomen Ighedoise held on 9/13/2022

(Digital) (FN) (Entered: 09/13/2022)

04/07/2022

1101

04/11

1102 STATUS REPORT/or April 2022 by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise (Scruggs,

Patrick) (Entered: 04/11/2022)

05/10/^M

1107

STATUS REPORT/or May 2022 by USA as to Akohomen Ighedoise (Scruggs,

Patrick) (Entered: 05/10/2022)

09/13/2022

1127

CONSENT regarding entry of a plea of guilty as to Akohomen Ighedoise. (FN)

(Entered: 09/13/2022)

05/18/2022

1108

Unopposed MOTION to Continue trial oy Akohomen Ighedoise. ( Trombley. Wesley)

(Entered: 05/18/2022)

09/13/2022

1128

CONSENT to institute presentence investigation report as to Akohomen Ighedoise

(FN) (Entered: 09/13/2022)

05/20/2022

J1Q2 ORDER granting 1108 Motion to Continue as to Akohomen Ighedoise (1) Jury

09/13/2022

1129

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Concerning Plea of Guilty re: count

One of the Superseding Indictment as to Akohomen Ighedoise. Signed by

Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy on 9/13/2022. (FN) (Entered: 09/13/2022)

10/04/2022

1132

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA of guilty and adjudication of guilt re: Count One of the

Trial set August 2022 trial term before Judge Steven D. Merryday. Signed by

Judge Steven D. Merryday nu 5/20/2022. (DAY) (Entered: 05/20/2022)

6/29/23, d:59 PM

Judge Steven D. Merryday on 12/10/2021. (DAY) (Entered: 12/14/2021)

http'.://ec{.(lmd.uscourts.gov/egi-bln/DktRpt.pl?811833 5747707 76-L_1_0-1

Page 12 of 17

https://ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl781183357d770776-L_1_0-1

Page 13 of 17

Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Court - Middle District of Florida

6/29/23, 4:59 PM

Superseding Indictment as to Akohomen Ighedoise. Signed by Judge Steven D.

Merryday on 10/4/2022 .(DAY) (Entered: 10/04/2022)

Electronic Case Filing | U.S. Di'Vict Court - Middle District of Florida

C/23/23, 4:59 PM

Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy on 1/18/2023. (FN) (Entered: 01/18/2023)

01/18/2023

1149

Minute Entry for In Person proceedings held before Judge Steven D. Merryday:

SENTENCING held on 1/18/2023 for Akohomen Ighedoise, Count 1, Imprisonment:

210 months; Supervised Release: 3 years; Fine: Waived; Special Assessment: $100;

Restitution^,389,340.97; Count 2, Dismissed on motion by the United States. Court

Reporter: Rebekah Lockwood (DAY) (Entered: 01/20/2023)

01/20/2023

1150

JUDGMENT as to Akohomen Ighedoise, Count 1, Imprisonment: 210 months;

Supervised Release: 3 years; Fine: Waived; Special Assessment: $100;

Restitution:$4,389,340.97; Count 2, Dismissed on motion by the United States

Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 1/20/2023. (DAY) (Entered: 01/20/2023)

11/01/2022

1134

RULE 32(e)(2) INITIAL PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT as to

Akohomen Ighedoise. E-copies made available to selected parties.(KT) (Entered:

11/01/2022)

11/07/2022

1135

MOTION for Forfeiture of an Order of Forfeiture by USA as to Akohomen

Ighedoise. (Nebesky, Suzanne) (Entered: 11/07/2022)

11/29/2022

1136

RULE 32(g) FINAL PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT as to Akohomen

Ighedoise. E-copies made available to selected parties.(SR) (Entered: 11/29/2022)

11/29/2022

1138

Unopposed MOTION to Continue Sentencing by Akohomen Ighedoise. (Trombley,

Wesley) (Entered: 11/29/2022)

01/20/2023

1151

STATEMENT OF REASONS as to Akohomen Ighedoise. E-copies made avad^le

to selected parties. (DAY) (Entered: 01/20/2023)

12/02/2022

1139

ENDORSED ORDER granting 1138 Motion to Continue as to Akohomen

Ighedoise. A separate notice will reschedule the sentencing date. Signed by

Judge Steven D. Merryday on 12/2/2022. (DAY) (Entered: 12/02/2022)

01/25/2023

1153

NOTICE OF APPEAL by Akohomen Ighedoise re J_L50 Judgment,. Filing fe

paid (Bums. Thomas) (Entered: 01/25/2023)

1154

1140

NOTICE OF RESCHEDULING HEARING: The sentencing hearing previously

scheduled for 12/06/2022 is rescheduled as to Akohomen Ighedoise. New hearing

date and time:sentencing set for 1/18/2023 at 09:00 AM in Tampa Courtroom 15 A

before Judge Steven D. Merryday. (DAY) (Entered: 12/02/2022)

01/26/2023

12/02/2022

1141

ORDER granting 1135-motion for order of forfeiture as to Akohomen

Ighedoise. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 12/2/2022. (KRM) Modified

on 12/2/2022 (KRM). (Entered: 12/02/2022)

TRANSMITTAL of initial appeal package as to Akohomen Ighedoise to USCA

consisting of copies of notice of appeal, docket sheet, order/judgment being

appealed, and motion, if applicable to USCA re 1153 Notice of Appeal. Eleventh

Circuit Transcript information form forwarded to pro se litigants and available to

counsel at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under Forms and Publications/General. (CTR)

(Entered: 01/26/2023)

USCA Case Number as to Akohomen Ighedoise. USCA Number: 23-10270-D for

1153 Notice of Appeal filed by Akohomen Ighedoise. (JNB) (Entered: 01/30/2023)

01/30/2023

12/02/2022

1142

ENDORSED ORDER: This is NOTICE, although not required by law, to the

United States and to Ighedoise that at the sentencing the judge will consider

imposing a sentence that varies upward from the applicable guidelines range.

Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 12/2/2022. (Entered: 12/02/2022)

01/30/2023

1155

TRANSCRIPT information form filed by Akohomen Ighedoise for proceedings held

on 11/18/21 before Judge Jenkins re 1153 Notice of Appeal. USCA number: 2310270. Electronic notification sent to Court Reporter Sharon Miller (Burns, Thomas)

(Entered: 01/30/2023)

01/05/2023

1143

PRESENTENCE REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM/ATTACHMENTS

as to Akohomen Ighedoise. E-copies made available to selected parties.(KT)

(Entered: 01/05/2023)

01/30/2023

1156

01/10/2023

I 144

SENTENCING MEMORANDUM by Akohomen Ighedoise (Attachments: # i

Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Trombley,

Wesley) (Entered: 01/10/2023)

TRANSCRIPT information form filed by Akohomen Ighedoise for proceedings held

on 9/13/22 before Judge McCoy re 1153 Notice of Appeal. USCA number: 2310270. Electronic notification sent to Court Reporter Sharon Miller (Burns, Thomas)

(Entered: 01/30/2023)

01/30/2023

1157

TRANSCRIPT information form filed by Akohomen Ighedoise for proceedi

on 1/18/23 before Judge Merryday re 1153 Notice of Appeal. USCA numbe

10270. Electronic notification sent to Court Reporter Rebekah Lockwood (Burns)

Thomas) (Entered: 01/30/2023)

02/13/2023

JJ60 COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT by SHARON A. MILLER re JJ53

01/18/2023

1145

MOTION to Appoint Counsel For Appeal by Akohomen Ighedoise. (Trombley,

Wesley) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy. (Entered: 01/18/2023)

01/18/2023

1146

ENDORSED ORDER granting 1145 Motion to Appoint Counsel For Appeal as

to Akohomen Ighedoise (1). Attorney Wesley E. Trombley is withdraw n as

counsel of record and has no further responsibility in the case. Signed by

Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy on 1/18/2023. (FN) (Entered: 01/18/2023)

01/18/2023

1147

ORDER of Appointment of CJA Counsel as to Akohomen Ighedoise:

Appointment of Attorney Thomas A. Burns for Akohomen Ighedoise. Signed by

https://ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-biri/DktRpt.pl7811833574770776-LJ_0-1

Page 14 of 17

Notice of Appeal as to Akohomen Ighedoise. Estimated transcript filing date: 30 days

from CJA-24 authorization. USCA number: 23-10270. (SAM) (Entered: 02/13/2023)

02/13/2023

1161

COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT by SHARON A. MILLER re 1153

Notice of Appeal as to Akohomen Ighedoise. Estimated transcript filing date: 30 days

from receipt of CJA authorization. USCA number: 23-10270. (SAM) (Entered:

https://ec Ulmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl7811S33574770776-L_1_0-1

Page 15 of 17

Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Court - Middle District of Florida

6/2S/23, 4:59 PM

Electronic Case Filing | U.S. district Court - Middle District of Florida

6/29/23, 4:59 PM

02/13/2023)

02/21/2023

1162

COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT by Rebekah Lockwood re 1153

Notice of Appeal as to Akohomen Ighedoise. Estimated transcript filing date:

03/13/2023. USCA number: 23-10270. (RML) (Entered: 02/21/2023)

03/07/2023

1163

TRANSCRIPT of INITIAL APPRANCE/BOND/DETENTJON HEARING for dates

of NOVEMBER 18,2021 held before Judge ELIZABETH A. JENKINS, re: 1153

Notice of Appeal as to Akohomen Ighedoise. Court Reporter/Transcriber: SHARON

A. MILLER. Email address: Sharon_miller@fimd.uscourts.gov. Telephone number

813301504).

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with

the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such notice

is filed, the transcript may be made remotely available to the public without redaction

after ninety (90) calendar days. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal

or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release

ofTranscript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER or

purchased through the Court Reporter. Redaction Request due 3/28/2023. Redacted

Transcript Deadline set for 4/7/2023. Release ofTranscript Restriction set for

6/5/2023. (SAM) (Entered: 03/07/2023)

03/07/2023

1164

NOTIFICATION that transcript has been filed by SHARON A. MILLER re: 1153

Notice of Appeal as to Akohomen Ighedoise. USCA number: 23-10270. (SAM)

(Entered: 03/07/2023)

Jim TRANSCRIPT of CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING for dates of SEPTEMBER 13,

2022 held before Judge MAC R. McCOY, re: JJ53 Notice of Appeal as to

Akohomen Ighedoise. Court Reporter/Transcriber: SHARON A. MILLER. Email

address: Sharon_miller@flmd.uscourts.gov. Telephone number: 8133015041.

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with

the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such notice

is filed, the transcript may be made remotely available to the public without redaction

after ninety (90) calendar days. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal

or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release

of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER or

purchased through the Court Reporter. Redaction Request due 4/3/2023. Redacted

Transcript Deadline set for 4/13/2023. Release ofTranscript Restriction set for

6/J 2/2023. (RML) (Entered: 03/13/2023)

03/13/2023

i 168

NOTIFICATION that transcript has been filed by Rebekah Lockwood re: 1133

Notice of Appeal as to Akohomen Ighedoise. USCA number: 23-10270. (RML)

(Entered: 03/13/2023)

PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt

06/29/2023 16:59:07

PA CUR

iburnsOO 12535 Client Code:

003-053

Description:

Docket Report

Criteria:

8: !5-cr-00320-SDMMRM

Billable

Pages:

Cost:

1.30

Exempt Rag:

Exempt

reason:

Exempt CJA