Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kenneth Eugene Smith, Petitioner v. John Q. Hamm, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al.

Supreme Court briefJan 25, 2024

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

No.

KENNETH EUGENE SMITH,

Petitioner,

v.

COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Respondent.

ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO

THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

PETITIONER’S APPENDIX—VOLUME II (APP’X F-J)

Andrew B. Johnson

BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP

1819 Fifth Avenue North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

(205) 521-8000

ajohnson@bradley.com

Robert M. Grass

Counsel of Record

Jeffrey H. Horowitz

David Kerschner

ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP

250 West 55th Street

New York, New York 10019

(212) 836-8000

robert.grass@arnoldporter.com

jeffrey.horowitz@arnoldporter.com

david.kerschner@arnoldporter.com

Counsel for Petitioner

TABLE OF CONTENTS

APPENDIX

Appendix A

Appendix B

Appendix C

Appendix D

Appendix E

Appendix F

Appendix G

Appendix H

DOCUMENT

Opinion of the United States Court of

Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Kenneth Eugene Smith v. Comm’r,

Ala. Dep’t of Corr., No. 24-10095, Doc.

58-1 (11th Cir. Jan. 24, 2024)

Memorandum Opinion and Order of

the District Court for the Middle

District of Alabama

Smith v. Hamm, No. 2:23-cv-00656,

DE 69 (M.D. Ala. Jan. 10, 2024)

Order of the United States Court of

Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Kenneth Eugene Smith v. Comm’r,

Ala. Dep’t of Corr., No. 24-10095, Doc.

44-2 (11th Cir. Jan. 20, 2024)

Order of the District Court for the

Middle District of Alabama

Smith v. Hamm, No. 2:23-cv-00656,

DE 88 (M.D. Ala. Jan. 24, 2024)

Plaintiff Kenneth Eugene Smith’s

Renewed Emergency Motion to

Supplement the Record (with exhibits)

Smith v. Hamm, No. 2:23-cv-00656,

DE 87 (M.D. Ala. Jan. 23, 2024)

Second Amended Complaint

Smith v. Hamm, No. 2:23-cv-00656,

DE 31 (M.D. Ala. Nov. 28, 2023)

Declaration of Dr. Robert Jason Yong,

MD, MBA, dated Nov. 17, 2023

Smith v. Hamm, No. 2:23-cv-00656,

DE 19-1 (M.D. Ala. Nov. 20, 2023)

Supplemental Declaration of Dr.

Robert Jason Yong, MD, MBA, dated

Dec. 18, 2023

ii

PAGE

1a

36a

84a

86a

90a

147a

184a

236a

Appendix I

Appendix J

Appendix K

Smith v. Hamm, No. 2:23-cv-00656,

DE 62-58 (M.D. Ala. Dec. 22, 2023)

Declaration of Dr. Katherine

Porterfield, Ph.D., dated Nov. 18, 2023

Smith v. Hamm, No. 2:23-cv-00656,

DE 19-3 (M.D. Ala. Nov. 20, 2023)

Supplemental Declaration of Dr.

Katherine Porterfield, Ph.D., dated

Dec. 15, 2023

Smith v. Hamm, No. 2:23-cv-00656,

DE 62-113 (M.D. Ala. Dec. 22, 2023)

Declaration of Dr. Jonathan I. Groner,

MD, dated Nov. 13, 2023

Smith v. Hamm, No. 2:23-cv-00656,

DE 19-1 (M.D. Ala. Nov. 20, 2023)

iii

238a

310a

374a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 1 of 37

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

KENNETH EUGENE SMITH,

)

)

Plaintiff,

)

)

v.

)

)

JOHN Q. HAMM, in his official capacity )

as Commissioner, Alabama Department of )

Corrections, and

)

)

TERRY RAYBON, in his official capacity )

as Warden, Holman Correctional Facility, )

)

Defendants.

)

Case No. 2:23-cv-00656-RAH

CAPITAL CASE

EXECUTION SCHEDULED FOR

JANUARY 25, 2024

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Kenneth Eugene Smith alleges as follows:

INTRODUCTION

1.

Plaintiff Kenneth Eugene Smith is in the custody of the Alabama Department of

Corrections (“ADOC”) at William C. Holman Correctional Facility (“Holman”) under a death

sentence imposed by the State of Alabama despite the jury’s recommendation by a vote of 11 to 1

that he be sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. As the Eleventh Circuit

has recognized, “if Smith’s trial had occurred today, he would not be eligible for execution

because, in 2017, Alabama amended its capital sentencing scheme” to repeal the authority of

elected circuit court judges to override a jury’s sentencing determination. See Smith v. Comm’r,

850 F. App’x 726, 726 n.1 (11th Cir. 2021). Because the amendment applied only prospectively,

Mr. Smith has been denied relief from his death sentence, even though that same sentence could

not be imposed today given his jury’s sentencing vote.

1

147a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 2 of 37

2.

Mr. Smith brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to enjoin an imminent

deprivation of his rights and privileges secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States.

3.

The State already has tried to execute Mr. Smith once. On November 17, 2022,

Mr. Smith survived ADOC’s attempt to execute him by lethal injection when ADOC personnel

were unable to place intravenous (“IV”) lines to administer lethal drugs to him. Mr. Smith’s was

the third consecutive execution that ADOC botched and/or failed for the same reason—its inability

to place IV lines in the condemned person. ADOC’s failed attempt to execute Mr. Smith caused

him severe and ongoing physical and psychological pain, including severe post-traumatic stress

disorder (“PTSD”). ADOC remained willfully blind to the risk of that outcome by failing to

investigate what happened and why during its immediate two previous botched and/or failed

executions to prevent a recurrence before it attempted to execute Mr. Smith.

4.

Now ADOC seeks to execute Mr. Smith by nitrogen hypoxia—an execution

method that has “never been used to carry out an execution and ha[s] no track record of successful

use.” Bucklew v. Precythe, 139 S. Ct. 1112, 1130 (2019) (internal quotation marks and citation

omitted).

5.

For years, and as recently as just a few months ago, ADOC had taken the position

that nitrogen hypoxia was not a feasible, alternative method of execution. Then, on the eve of

being required to disclose information regarding its failed attempt to execute Mr. Smith by lethal

injection, ADOC suddenly changed course, now claiming it is prepared to carry out executions

using nitrogen hypoxia.

6.

Mr. Smith’s execution by nitrogen hypoxia would violate his constitutional rights.

ADOC selected Mr. Smith for the first ever attempted execution by nitrogen hypoxia even though

he has an appeal pending in the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals from the dismissal of a non2

148a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 3 of 37

frivolous state postconviction petition that addresses the constitutional problem with attempting to

execute Mr. Smith for a second time, and even though other condemned people in Alabama who

elected to be executed by nitrogen hypoxia when that option was made available to them in 2018

have exhausted their appeals.

7.

ADOC’s selection of Mr. Smith as the test subject for this novel and experimental

method is arbitrary and capricious and inconsistent with its own stated “‘custom [to] wait[] to

move for an inmate’s execution until he has exhausted his conventional appeals: direct appeal,

state postconviction, and federal habeas.” Woods v. Comm’r, Ala. Dep’t of Corrs., 951 F.3d 1288,

1292 (11th Cir. 2020) (citation omitted in original). As such, moving Mr. Smith to the front of the

line for execution by nitrogen hypoxia violates his rights to due process and equal protection under

the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

8.

Moreover, the protocol by which ADOC intends to execute Mr. Smith is

constitutionally deficient. ADOC proposes to carry out Mr. Smith’s execution by nitrogen hypoxia

by following its recently released Execution Procedures as of August 2023 (the “Protocol”). Ex.

1.1

9.

When Mr. Smith challenged his execution by lethal injection in 2022 and proposed

nitrogen hypoxia as a feasible and available alternative, he did not agree to be executed without

knowing the protocol, much less by ADOC using a protocol that he had never seen and that was

hastily introduced as a means to moot Mr. Smith’s pending litigation about ADOC’s previous

failed attempt to execute him by lethal injection and forestall discovery into it.

1

Mr. Smith has filed a copy of the Protocol under seal. Mr. Smith has filed a copy of the “public

version,” which includes redactions, on the public docket.

3

149a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 4 of 37

10.

It is clear that the consequences of attempting an execution by nitrogen hypoxia

using ADOC’s deficient Protocol will be dire. If not performed correctly, execution by nitrogen

hypoxia can result in another botched execution that risks leaving Mr. Smith with permanent

injuries. For example, hypoxemia (low levels of oxygen in the blood), which can lead to hypoxia

(low levels of oxygen in organs), can cause severe and permanent injuries short of death, including

a persistent vegetative state, stroke, or the painful sensation of suffocation. Therefore, it is critical

that the procedures ADOC employs are designed to reduce those risks to the lowest possible levels.

11.

The Protocol, if used to attempt to execute Mr. Smith by nitrogen hypoxia, exposes

him to a severe risk of superadded pain during the execution process, including but not limited to

hypoxemia and hypoxia short of death, in violation of his right to be free from cruel and unusual

punishment under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. There are

several specific problems with the Protocol, which will exacerbate—rather than reduce—the risk

of the dire consequences that can result from nitrogen hypoxia for at least the following reasons.

12.

First, it appears that ADOC intends to deliver pure nitrogen to the condemned

person from a cannister through tubing that flows into a “one size fits all” mask that a member of

the Execution Team will place over the condemned person’s face and adjust. See Protocol

§ X.A.v.; Appendix C, § 2 ¶¶ 26–29. But the Protocol does not provide any information on the

type of mask that will be used, or how the mask will be secured so that it remains sealed and in

proper position over the condemned person’s face throughout the process. Indeed, the Protocol

contemplates that the condemned person will be permitted to make a statement after the mask is

placed over his face. The protocol therefore assumes the mask will be secured in such a way that

the inmate will be able to speak after it is in place, which can dislodge the mask and break the seal.

Id. § X.A.ix. If the mask is not sealed throughout the process, oxygen can leak inside the mask

4

150a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 5 of 37

and the condemned person can inhale it. If the condemned person can inhale oxygen, that likely

would prolong the time to reach unconsciousness and could lead to a persistent vegetative state,

stroke, or the painful sensation of suffocation.

13.

Second, the Protocol does not contemplate any mechanism to remove the carbon

dioxide under the mask as the condemned person exhales so that carbon dioxide does not build to

dangerous levels in the condemned person. If the condemned person inhales carbon dioxide after

the mask is placed on his face, he will experience the painful sensation of suffocating and other

dire consequences. This is particularly a problem given the provision in the Protocol that

contemplates that the condemned person will be permitted to make a statement after the mask is

placed over his face. Id.

14.

Third, the Protocol does not specify the purity of the nitrogen that will be used or

how the tanks will be stored when not in use, which is critical to prevent contamination. If ADOC

uses less than 100% pure nitrogen to execute a condemned person, that likely would prolong the

time to reach unconsciousness and could lead to the same dire consequences.

15.

Fourth, the Protocol does not contain any provisions both during the days leading

up to the execution and during the execution to address the unique situation of Mr. Smith who

survived a prior execution attempt and is experiencing PTSD as a result. People with PTSD, like

Mr. Smith, can experience nausea when they are re-exposed to the traumatizing event. A second

attempt to execute Mr. Smith undoubtedly is such an event. And the Protocol does not provide for

any procedures if a condemned person vomits into the mask in which case the condemned person

could choke on his own vomit. Nor does the Protocol make any accommodation for condemned

people with PTSD as a result of a previous attempted execution who may experience symptoms

5

151a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 6 of 37

such as intense psychological distress, extreme panic, or sleep disruption leading up to another

attempt.

16.

Fifth the Protocol unconstitutionally burdens Mr. Smith’s First Amendment rights

and violates his rights under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act

(“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc, et seq. and the Alabama Religious Freedom Amendment

(“ARFA”), Ala. Const. art. I, § 3.01(V). The Protocol provides that a mask will be placed over

the condemned person’s face before he is permitted to make a statement. In addition to the risk of

dislodging the mask, those provisions of the Protocol will interfere with Mr. Smith’s right to speak

audibly and to pray audibly with or without a spiritual advisor.

There is no compelling

governmental interest that justifies that burden on Mr. Smith’s rights and, in any event, there are

less restrictive alternatives to accomplish any purported compelling governmental interest.

17.

There are feasible and available alternatives, including amendments to the Protocol

to address its inadequacies. Absent such amendments, executing Mr. Smith by nitrogen hypoxia

according to the Protocol would violate his Eighth and First Amendment rights.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

18.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, and any other relief

available from the Court.

19.

The Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C.

§§ 1331, 1343(a)(3), 1367(a), and 2201(a).

20.

Venue is proper in the Middle District of Alabama under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

6

152a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 7 of 37

PARTIES

21.

Plaintiff Kenneth Eugene Smith, a citizen of the United States and of the State of

Alabama, is an inmate at Holman under Defendants’ supervision and subject to execution under a

state court judgment of conviction for capital murder.

22.

Defendant John Q. Hamm is sued in his official capacity as the Commissioner of

ADOC. ADOC is an administrative department of the State responsible for administering and

exercising the direct and effective control over penal and corrections institutions within the State.

At all relevant times, Defendant Hamm has been acting under color of state law and as the agent

and official representative of ADOC, pursuant to ADOC’s official policies and procedures.

23.

Defendant Hamm is responsible for procedures governing the execution of

condemned people in Alabama, including developing and implementing the Protocol, and

approving changes or amendments to it. See Protocol § I.A (“Approval authority for changes or

amendments to this protocol is the Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections”).

Additionally, he is statutorily charged with providing the materials necessary to execute

condemned people in Alabama. See Ala. Code § 15-18-82 (“It shall be the duty of the Department

of Corrections of this State to provide the necessary facilities, instruments, and accommodations

to carry out the execution.”).

24.

Defendant Hamm also is responsible for ensuring that all prisoners committed to

ADOC’s custody are treated in accordance with the U.S. and Alabama Constitutions.

25.

Defendant Terry Raybon is sued in his official capacity as the Warden of Holman.

At all relevant times, Defendant Raybon has been acting under color of state law and as the agent

and official representative of Holman and ADOC, pursuant to ADOC’s official policies and

procedures.

7

153a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 8 of 37

26.

Defendant Raybon is the statutory executioner of all condemned people in

Alabama. See Ala. Code § 15-18-82 (“The warden of the William C. Holman unit . . . shall be the

executioner.”). In that capacity, Defendant Raybon plays a direct role in each execution that takes

place at Holman. Defendant Raybon organizes the execution team. See Protocol § V. He is

responsible for implementing ADOC policies and procedures governing executions, managing the

preparations for an execution, and supervising the execution site during the execution. Defendant

Raybon has specific responsibilities to inventory, inspect, and activate the equipment used in

executions by nitrogen hypoxia and to ensure that the equipment is available and functioning

properly. See id. §§ V.D.ii, V.D.iv, V.D.v, IX.E.ii, IX.I.v, IX.I.vi, X.A.i, X.A.xii, X.A.xiv,

XI.A.iii, XI.A.v.

27.

Defendant Raybon also is responsible for ensuring that all prisoners incarcerated at

Holman are treated in accordance with the U.S. and Alabama Constitutions.

CASE OR CONTROVERSY

28.

There is a real and justiciable case or controversy between the parties. Defendants

intend to execute Mr. Smith by nitrogen hypoxia within a time frame set by the Governor.

Defendants intend to use the Protocol to attempt to accomplish that result, which will subject

Mr. Smith to an objectively intolerable risk of superadded pain.

EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

29.

Mr. Smith has no available administrative remedies because State law exempts

“[t]he policies and procedures of the Department of Corrections for executions of persons

sentenced to death . . . from the Alabama Administrative Procedure Act, Chapter 22 of Title 41.”

Ala. Code § 15-18-82.1(g).

8

154a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 9 of 37

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

A.

Mr. Smith Has PTSD Caused by ADOC’s Failed Attempt to Execute Him by

Lethal Injection with Deliberate Indifference to His Constitutional Rights

30.

In November 2022, ADOC tried and failed to execute Mr. Smith because it was

unable to place IV lines to deliver lethal drugs into his bloodstream. ADOC did so despite

experiencing the same problem in its two immediately preceding attempts to execute condemned

people and without doing any investigation about what happened and why to prevent a recurrence

before it attempted to execute Mr. Smith. Given that, ADOC’s attempts to establish intravenous

access went “‘so far beyond what [is] needed to carry out a death sentence that [it] could only be

explained as reflecting pain for pain’s sake.’” Smith v. Hamm, No. 2:22-cv-497, 2022 WL

4353143, at *7 (M.D. Ala. Jul. 5, 2023) (citation omitted). Among other things, ADOC’s actions

left Mr. Smith with PTSD. About one year later, ADOC seeks to make Mr. Smith the test case for

its novel and largely secret nitrogen hypoxia Protocol.

31.

On July 28, 2022, ADOC botched the execution of Joe Nathan James when it

strapped him to a gurney and poked, prodded, and cut him, attempting multiple times over three

hours to access a vein for IV injection of the lethal drugs. On September 22, 2022, ADOC

unsuccessfully attempted to execute Alan Eugene Miller because ADOC personnel were unable

to set IV lines to administer the lethal drugs after they “painfully punctured [him] with needles

over various parts of his body for approximately 90 minutes,” which caused “extreme physical

pain as well as psychological pain . . . .” Miller v. Hamm, 640 F. Supp.3d 1220, 1241 (M.D. Ala.

2022). After the botched execution of Mr. James and the failed attempt to execute Mr. Miller,

ADOC did nothing to investigate its lethal injection procedures to determine what happened and

why in an effort to prevent a recurrence.

9

155a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 10 of 37

32.

In August 2022, three weeks after Mr. James’s botched execution, Mr. Smith

commenced an action in this District against Defendant Hamm, alleging that his execution by

lethal injection would violate his right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment under the

Eighth Amendment and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to prohibit ADOC from

executing him by lethal injection. See Smith v. Hamm, No. 2:22-cv-497, Complaint (DE 1) (M.D.

Ala.) (“Lethal Injection Action”)

33.

After the botched execution of Mr. James and the failed attempt to execute

Mr. Miller, ADOC remained willfully blind to the insufficiency of its lethal injection procedures

and forged ahead with Mr. Smith’s execution, which was scheduled for November 17 at 6 p.m.2

34.

Before it attempted to execute Mr. Smith, Defendants and ADOC knew or should

have known based on the difficulties that occurred during Mr. James’s execution and Mr. Miller’s

attempted execution that the IV Team would have great difficulty establishing intravenous access,

resulting in severe physical and psychological pain to Mr. Smith.

35.

They further knew or should have known that what they allegedly had done to

Mr. Miller—as described in a pleading that he filed in this District—stated a plausible claim for

violation of the Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. See Miller

v. Hamm, No. 2:22-cv-506, 2022 WL 16721093, at *13–15 (M.D. Ala. Nov. 4, 2022).

36.

Despite all that, Defendants and ADOC recklessly and knowingly charged ahead

with deliberate indifference to Mr. Smith’s Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and

unusual punishment.

37.

As Mr. Smith foresaw, and as happened in the previous two executions, ADOC was

unable to place IV lines for delivery of the lethal drugs to him and its repeated, unsuccessful

2

All times referenced in this Complaint are Central Time.

10

156a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 11 of 37

attempts to do so caused Mr. Smith severe and ongoing physical and psychological pain. See

Barber v. Gov. of Ala., 73 F.4th 1306, 1324 (11th Cir. 2023) (J. Pryor, J., dissenting) (“Mr. Smith’s

horrifying experience was not a singular event; it was just the latest incident in an uninterrupted

pattern of executions by Alabama’s Department of Corrections (‘ADOC’) that involved protracted,

severely painful, and grisly efforts to establish the intravenous lines necessary to carry the lethal

drugs into his body.”).

38.

A little before 8:00 p.m. on November 17, corrections officers handcuffed and put

leg irons on Mr. Smith, removed him from the holding cell where he was located, escorted him to

the execution chamber, and strapped him to a gurney with restraints around his arms, legs, and

feet. Mr. Smith remained strapped to the gurney unable to move for nearly four hours even though

a stay of the execution issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit was

in place until it was vacated by the U.S. Supreme Court at approximately 10:20 p.m. See Smith v.

Comm’r Ala. Dep’t of Corrs., No. 22-13846-P, 2022 WL 19831029 (11th Cir. Nov. 17, 2022),

vacated sub nom., Hamm v. Smith, 143 S. Ct. 440 (2022).

39.

Mr. Smith was not told that the Eleventh Circuit had stayed his execution. Nor was

Mr. Smith released from the gurney restraints and removed from the execution chamber while the

stay was in place. He believed that when he was taken into the execution chamber, all of his

appeals had been exhausted, and that he would be killed imminently.

40.

As a man of faith, Mr. Smith sought to maintain his dialogue with God. He thanked

God for the week he had just had with his family and quietly sang to himself the contemporary

hymn, “I’m not alone.”

41.

As time passed with no apparent steps to accomplish the execution and no

information from the three corrections officers who remained in the execution chamber with him,

11

157a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 12 of 37

Mr. Smith became increasingly distressed due to the lack of circulation caused by the restraints

and because his witnesses, including his wife, son, and daughter-in-law, had not arrived and he

feared he would be killed without the ability to address them and the victim’s family as he had

planned.

42.

At around 10:00 pm, three men wearing medical scrubs (the “IV Team”) who were

not identified to Mr. Smith, and have not been identified to him since, entered the execution

chamber. At the same time, two men and one woman dressed formally, one holding an accordion

folder and two holding a notepad and pen, also entered the execution chamber. Those people also

were not identified to Mr. Smith and have not been identified since. Nor has ADOC disclosed the

roles they served in the execution process or otherwise explained their presence in the execution

chamber, which was particularly distressing because some of them appeared to be taking pictures

or video with their cell phones.

43.

On information and belief, others, including Defendants, observed activities in the

execution chamber from an adjacent room.

44.

ADOC’s then-governing protocol for executing condemned people by lethal

injection authorized only two methods for establishing IV access: the “standard procedure” or, if

that was unavailable, “a central line procedure.”

45.

It should be a straightforward process to establish IV access by those procedures or

to determine that neither is achievable. According to the Emergency Nurses Association Clinical

Practice Guideline for Difficult Intravenous Access, “[t]he average time requirement for peripheral

IV cannulation is reported at 2.5 to 16 minutes, with difficult IV access requiring as much as 30

minutes.” ENA Clinical Practice Guideline: Difficult Intravenous Access (Revised Oct. 2015).

And “[p]atients experience increased and potentially significant pain in association with multiple

12

158a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 13 of 37

IV attempts.” J. Fields, et al., Association between multiple IV attempts and perceived pain levels

in the emergency department, 15 J. Vasc. Access 514, 518 (2014); A. Bahl, et al., Defining difficult

intravenous access (DIVA): A systematic review, J. Vasc. Access 1, 1 (Nov. 2021) (“multiple

venipuncture attempts sometimes required for successful [IV] insertion . . . can cause pain and

anxiety for the patient”).

46.

But, as it had with Messrs. James and Miller, ADOC took well in excess of 30

minutes attempting unsuccessfully to obtain IV access to administer the lethal drugs to Mr. Smith.

47.

In an unsuccessful attempt to establish two IV lines by the standard procedure, the

IV Team jabbed Mr. Smith repeatedly, sliding the catheter needle continuously in and out of his

arms and hands, while ignoring Mr. Smith’s complaints that they were penetrating his muscles and

causing severe pain.

48.

Having failed to establish IV access by the standard procedure, the IV Team next

tried to do so using a central line procedure. Toward that end, at the request of the IV Team, the

corrections officers tilted the gurney backwards so that Mr. Smith lay in a reverse crucifixion

position with his head below his feet. Neither the IV Team nor anyone else in the execution

chamber explained why they requested that or informed Mr. Smith about the procedure they were

about to attempt.

49.

After placing a blue surgical drape with a clear plastic shield in the face area over

Mr. Smith, one of the members of the IV Team, who was wearing a surgical gown, face mask, and

clear plastic shield over his face, made five or six needle jabs with a clear syringe in Mr. Smith’s

collarbone area, causing him severe pain. Then, the same IV Team member inserted a large gauge

needle into Mr. Smith’s collarbone area and made multiple jabs, which caused Mr. Smith so much

pain that he contorted against the restraints on the gurney injuring his right shoulder and had

13

159a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 14 of 37

difficulty breathing. After what seemed like an eternity to Mr. Smith, the needle jabs stopped. All

the while the IV Team, the corrections officers, and the three other people in the execution chamber

ignored Mr. Smith’s complaints about the severe pain he was experiencing and his pleas to contact

the court presiding over the Lethal Injection Action and/or his counsel.

50.

ADOC and the IV Team abandoned their efforts to obtain IV access shortly before

midnight, long after it should have been apparent that they would not succeed. Mr. Smith was

unable to stand, walk, or dress and undress himself without assistance when his ordeal concluded

and the corrections officers released him from the gurney restraints.

51.

Mr. Smith experienced and continues to experience a great deal of physical and

psychological pain from ADOC’s attempt to execute him. After the execution, he experienced

lingering pain in his arm from repeated needle jabs and in his collarbone from ADOC’s attempted

central line procedure. He also experienced back spasms from being restrained on the gurney for

nearly four hours.

52.

Mr. Smith also has had chronically severe psychological consequences, including

severe PTSD. In addition to difficulty sleeping, Mr. Smith’s symptoms include nightmares,

hypervigilance, hyperarousal, and disassociation (a defense mechanism to suppress threatening

thoughts).

B.

ADOC’s Decision to Make a Renewed Attempt to Execute Mr. Smith by

Nitrogen Hypoxia and to Put Him in the Front of the Line

53.

Even after its failed attempt to execute Mr. Smith by lethal injection in November

2022, ADOC insisted that it would attempt to do so again by that method. In late August 2023,

ADOC suddenly switched its position, on the eve of discovery deadlines in the Lethal Injection

Action, and announced that due to Mr. Smith’s unique circumstances lethal injection is not an

available method to execute him and that it would execute him instead by nitrogen hypoxia.

14

160a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 15 of 37

ADOC chose Mr. Smith as the first condemned person to be subject to execution by that novel and

untested method of execution even though he has an appeal pending in the Alabama Court of

Criminal Appeals from denial of a state postconviction petition and there are other condemned

people who chose to be elected by nitrogen hypoxia five years ago and whose appeals have

exhausted. In addition, ADOC’s actions had the effect of rendering the Lethal Injection Action

moot before ADOC was required to engage in discovery and disclose what happened during its

botched execution of Mr. James and its failed attempts to execute Mr. Miller and Mr. Smith.

1.

54.

ADOC Selected Mr. Smith for the First Ever Nitrogen Hypoxia

Execution Contrary to Its Custom of Waiting Until Condemned People

Have Exhausted Their Appeals to Execute Them

In May 2023, Mr. Smith timely filed a petition in the Circuit Court of Jefferson

County seeking an injunction preventing the State from attempting to execute him again by any

method (the “State Court Petition”).

55.

The State Court Petition arises from ADOC’s failed attempt to execute Mr. Smith

in November 2022. Mr. Smith contends that another attempt to execute him is constitutionally

prohibited because it would follow “a series of abortive attempts,” including ADOC’s “single,

cruelly willful attempt” to execute Mr. Smith, La. ex rel. Francis v. Resweber, 329 U.S. 459, 471

(1947) (Frankfurter, J., concurring), which “demonstrate[s] an ‘objectively intolerable risk of

harm’ that officials may not ignore.” Baze v. Rees, 553 U.S. 35, 50 (2008) (plurality op.) (quoting

Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 846 & n.9 (1994)).

56.

As the claim that Mr. Smith asserts in the State Court Petition did not arise until

ADOC’s failed attempt to execute him in November 2022, it could not have been asserted in any

previous state or federal postconviction proceeding.

15

161a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 16 of 37

57.

On August 11, the circuit court dismissed the State Court Petition. Mr. Smith’s

appeal from that dismissal is pending in the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.

58.

Defendants seek to execute Mr. Smith by nitrogen hypoxia despite Mr. Smith’s

pending appeal from the dismissal of the State Court Petition in the Alabama Court of Criminal

Appeals and contrary to ADOC’s own stated “‘custom [to] wait[] to move for an inmate’s

execution until he has exhausted his conventional appeals: direct appeal, state postconviction, and

federal habeas.” Woods v. Comm’r, Ala. Dep’t of Corrs., 951 F.3d 1288, 1292 (11th Cir. 2020)

(citation omitted in original).

59.

There are other condemned people in Alabama whose appeals have exhausted and

who elected to be executed by nitrogen hypoxia.

60.

In 2018, the State authorized nitrogen hypoxia as a method of execution and

permitted condemned people whose capital convictions were then final to elect to be executed by

that method instead of lethal injection. See Ala. Code § 15-18-82.1(b)(2). The authorizing

legislation served to moot litigation brought by condemned people in Alabama challenging the

constitutionality of execution by lethal injection. See In re: Alabama Execution Protocol Litig.,

No. 1:12-cv-316, Joint Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 427) (M.D. Ala.).

61.

Mr. Smith was not a party to that litigation and did not elect to be executed by

nitrogen hypoxia in 2018. But “[n]early 50 . . . death sentenced inmates in Alabama elected

nitrogen hypoxia during the election period,” including death-sentenced inmates “who have

exhausted their conventional appeals.” Woods, 951 F.3d at 1291–92. Those inmates have yet to

be executed because ADOC only recently finalized a protocol for doing so. See id.

62.

In addition, on information and belief, ADOC gave at least one condemned person

who it intends to execute by nitrogen hypoxia a grace period so that the condemned inmate and

16

162a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 17 of 37

his counsel could review the Protocol before the State moved for authority to execute him under

its procedures.

63.

ADOC did not provide Mr. Smith with any comparable grace period; the State

moved for authority to execute him by nitrogen hypoxia on the same day it released a heavily

redacted version of the Protocol.

64.

Even though Mr. Smith has an appeal pending in the Alabama Court of Criminal

Appeals and other condemned people who elected to be executed by nitrogen hypoxia five years

ago have exhausted their appeals, the State chose Mr. Smith to be the first condemned person to

be subject to execution pursuant to its experimental nitrogen hypoxia Protocol.

2.

65.

ADOC’S Selection of Mr. Smith for the First-Ever Nitrogen Hypoxia

Execution Served to Moot the Lethal Injection Action

Shortly after ADOC’s failed execution attempt, Mr. Smith amended his complaint

in the Lethal Injection Action to add allegations about that attempt and to add defendants who

participated in it. In his second amended complaint, Mr. Smith sought declaratory and injunctive

relief to prohibit ADOC from making another attempt to execute him by lethal injection. He also

served discovery requests on the defendants, seeking, among other things, the identities of the

people who participated in and observed ADOC’s attempt to execute him and documents

concerning ADOC’s attempt to execute him.

66.

For ten months after ADOC’s failed attempt to execute Mr. Smith by lethal

injection, ADOC threatened Mr. Smith with another attempt by the same method. It consistently

represented that it would do so and that nitrogen hypoxia was not a feasible, alternative method of

execution. For example:

In December 2022, Defendant Hamm filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the

U.S. Supreme Court challenging the Eleventh Circuit’s holding in the Lethal

17

163a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 18 of 37

Injection Action that Mr. Smith had plausibly alleged “that nitrogen hypoxia is an

available alternative method” of execution and “that nitrogen hypoxia will

significantly reduce his pain.” Smith v. Comm’r, Ala. Dep’t of Corrs., No. 2213781, 2022 WL 17069492, at *5 (11th Cir. Nov. 17, 2022).

In February 2023, the defendants in the Lethal Injection Action moved to dismiss

Mr. Smith’s Second Amended Complaint on the ground, among others, that

nitrogen hypoxia supposedly was not an available method of execution, as

Mr. Smith had alleged, despite the Eleventh Circuit’s prior contrary determination.

See Smith v. Hamm, No. 2:22-cv-497, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 78) at

24–25 (M.D. Ala.).

On July 28, 2023, the State relied on supposed changes in its lethal injection

procedures as a basis to seek dismissal of the State Court Petition. See Smith v.

State, No. CC-89-1149.61, State of Alabama’s Motion to Dismiss Smith’s

Successive Rule 32 Petition (Doc. 53) at 10–12 (Ala. Cir. Ct. Jefferson Cnty.)

67.

In May 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court denied Defendant Hamm’s petition for a writ

of certiorari. See Hamm v. Smith, 143 S. Ct. 1188 (2023). In July 2023, the district court denied

the defendants’ motion to dismiss Mr. Smith’s Eighth Amendment claim for declaratory and

injunctive relief in the Lethal Injection Action. See Smith v. Hamm, No. 2:22-cv-497, 2023 WL

4353143 (M.D. Ala. July 5, 2023). Thus, by July 2023, there were no more obstacles to discovery

after defendants had delayed it for nearly one year trying unsuccessfully in the District Court,

Court of Appeals, and U.S. Supreme Court to have Mr. Smith’s claims dismissed.

68.

Under the District Court’s scheduling order in the Lethal Injection Action, the

parties’ initial disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) were due on

18

164a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 19 of 37

August 29. And, by operation of Rule 26(d)(2)(B), the defendants’ responses to Mr. Smith’s then

nearly nine-month-old discovery requests were due by September 7.

69.

On August 25—the eve of its discovery obligations ripening in the Lethal Injection

Action—the State moved in the Alabama Supreme Court for an order authorizing ADOC to

execute Mr. Smith by nitrogen hypoxia.

70.

At the same time the State filed its motion, defendants reversed position and moved

to dismiss the Lethal Injection Action on the ground that “Defendant Hamm has determined that

nitrogen hypoxia is an available means of execution and will be used in the execution of”

Mr. Smith and “Defendant Hamm has determined that lethal injection is not available as to

Plaintiff and will not be used in any future execution attempt of” Mr. Smith. Smith v. Hamm, No.

2:22-cv-497, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure (Doc. 104) at ¶ 3 (M.D. Ala.). And, on August 29, the defendants moved to stay

discovery in the Lethal Injection Action.3

71.

Defendants’ efforts to avoid discovery in the Lethal Injection Action are consistent

with the historical lack of transparency into ADOC’s execution procedures. The State exercises

no greater power than when it executes condemned people. Consequently, the process by which

the State does so demands maximum transparency to ensure that it is consistent with the

Constitution and the values of the State’s citizens. ADOC’s execution processes, however, are

anything but transparent.

72.

ADOC conceals the identity of the participants in executions, what they do, and

what “pre-execution” procedures it performs on condemned people. The only witnesses to those

3

On September 20, the District Court entered a judgment enjoining Defendants “from executing

Kenneth Eugene Smith by lethal injection” and dismissed the Lethal Injection Action. Smith v.

Hamm, No. 2:22-cv-497, Final Judgment and Order (Doc. 112) at 3 (M.D. Ala.).

19

165a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 20 of 37

“pre-execution” procedures are ADOC personnel and the condemned person (who with the rare

exception of Mr. Miller and Mr. Smith) ordinarily do not live to describe it. And, as ADOC’s

statements after the botched execution of Mr. James and the failed attempts to execute Mr. Miller

and Mr. Smith indicate, ADOC cannot be relied on for a forthcoming and accurate explanation

about those events.

73.

On November 1, a slim majority of six justices of the Alabama Supreme Court

granted the motion for an order authorizing ADOC to execute Mr. Smith by nitrogen hypoxia, with

two justices dissenting. On November 8, the Governor scheduled Mr. Smith’s execution by

nitrogen hypoxia during “a thirty-hour time-frame . . . beginning at 12:00 a.m. on Thursday,

January 25, 2024, and expiring at 6:00 a.m. on Friday, January 26, 2024.

C.

ADOC’s Nitrogen Hypoxia Protocol Poses an Intolerable Risk of Superadded

Pain to Mr. Smith

74.

ADOC has never attempted to execute a condemned person by nitrogen hypoxia.

Nor has any other state or the federal government.

75.

When it moved for authorization to execute Mr. Smith by that method, ADOC

released a heavily redacted copy of the Protocol, which includes procedures for executing

condemned people by nitrogen hypoxia. Despite his requests through counsel, neither Mr. Smith

nor his counsel were provided with an unredacted copy of the Protocol or any other information

about the process by which ADOC intends to execute Mr. Smith until November 22, 2023 after

this Court ordered Defendants to produce an unredacted copy of the Protocol. See Ex. 2.

76.

As one commentator has described it, ADOC’s nitrogen hypoxia Protocol is “‘a

vague, sloppy, dangerous and unjustifiably deficient protocol . . . .’” Ed Pilkington, ‘Astonishingly

cruel’: Alabama seeks to test execution method on death row ‘guinea pig’ (The Guardian Sept. 2,

20

166a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 21 of 37

2023),

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/sep/02/alabama-execution-nitrogen-kenneth-

smith.

77.

Despite its vagueness, it is apparent that the Protocol is wholly inadequate to protect

Mr. Smith from violation of his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual

punishment.

78.

There is sparse research on how long a human must be exposed to 100% pure

nitrogen to cause death, what happens if a human is exposed to less than 100% pure nitrogen for a

prolonged period of time, or on the pain or sensations that a human exposed to nitrogen might

experience. The American Veterinary Medical Association has advised that nitrogen hypoxia is

an acceptable method of euthanasia for pigs but “is unacceptable for other mammals” because

nitrogen “create[s] an anoxic environment that is distressing for some species.”4

79.

If it does not cause death, nitrogen hypoxemia can cause dire consequences,

including a persistent vegetative state, a stroke, or the painful sensation of suffocation.

80.

A persistent vegetative state is characterized by a profound and long-lasting loss of

consciousness and cognitive function, including awareness, reasoning, and memory, and is often

considered a long-term or permanent condition.

81.

A stroke is a serious medical condition involving brain damage that can cause

failure of speech, paralysis of limbs, and other serious effects.

82.

The Protocol fails to account for and instead exacerbates the risks of those dire

consequences.

4

American Veterinary Medical Association, AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals:

2020 Edition.

21

167a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 22 of 37

83.

It appears that the Protocol provides for nitrogen gas to be delivered through tubing

into a mask placed and adjusted over the condemned person’s face by a member of the execution

team:

The mask will be placed and adjusted on the condemned inmate’s face. One

Execution Team member will monitor the pulse oximeter while the Execution

Team Captain verifies that the mask has been properly placed. The Execution

Team Members responsible for secondary posts will be dismissed from the

execution chamber after the mask has been properly placed.

Protocol § X.A.v; see also id. Appendix C, § 2 ¶¶ 26–29.

84.

The Protocol does not contain any guidance on the type of mask that will be used,

how it will be placed and adjusted and by whom, what training the person(s) placing and adjusting

the mask will receive on how to do that and who will provide the training, how and under what

criteria it will be determined whether the mask has been “properly placed,” or what will happen if

the mask becomes displaced during the procedure.

85.

It is critical that the mask be properly secured and sealed throughout the process.

An acknowledgement form that ADOC intends to require spiritual advisors who serve condemned

people being executed by nitrogen hypoxia expressly warns of the possibility that nitrogen can

leak outside the mask. If nitrogen can escape outside the mask, it follows that oxygen can infiltrate

inside the mask. In that event, the time to unconsciousness will increase, posing a severe risk of

dire consequences to the condemned inmate, including being left in a persistent vegetative state,

experiencing a stroke, or experiencing the painful sensation of suffocating.

86.

Many variables affect proper placement and securing of a mask. Variations in nose

structure, facial hair, obesity, and other anatomic characteristics can increase the difficulty of mask

ventilation. The Protocol does not account for those variations among condemned people to ensure

22

168a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 23 of 37

that a mask is fitted securely to each condemned person that ADOC intends to execute by nitrogen

hypoxia.

87.

In addition, movement of the face or head can dislodge a mask and break the seal,

which is more likely in an execution setting than, for example, in a medical setting. The protocol

exacerbates that possibility because it affords the condemned person an opportunity to speak after

the mask is placed over his face:

[After mask is placed,] [t]he Warden will enter the execution chamber [redacted –

filed under seal] and read the execution warrant. The condemned inmate will be

given the opportunity to make a final statement (no more than two minutes).

Id. § X.A.ix.

88.

Speaking or attempting to speak may dislodge or otherwise alter the placement of

the mask, which may result in an imperfect seal and leaking. Although the Protocol contemplates

that, after the condemned person speaks, “[t]he team members inside the execution chamber will

make a final inspection of the mask,” id. § X.A.xiii, there is nothing in the Protocol to explain how

that inspection will be completed and what it will entail to ensure that the mask remains sealed

after the condemned person speaks and, if not, adjusting the mask appropriately. Nor are there

any procedures for what happens if the mask is dislodged thereafter.

89.

The Protocol is constitutionally deficient because it does not specify any criteria for

inspecting the mask. There are no provisions identifying how the “team members” will determine

if the mask is secure and will prevent oxygen from leaking inside the mask. Furthermore, there

are no provisions detailing the training the “team members” will receive, their level of experience

with the masks being used, or the metrics that will be used to ensure that the mask is “properly

placed” and passes the “final inspection.”

23

169a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 24 of 37

90.

Moreover, while it is important to ensure that oxygen is not present under the mask

for the condemned person to inhale, it is equally important to ensure that the carbon dioxide that

the condemned person exhales does not remain under the mask for the condemned person to inhale.

91.

The theory underlying the novel method of execution by nitrogen hypoxia is that

because nitrogen is odorless and colorless, a human inhaling it will continue to breathe normally

and continue to exhale carbon dioxide. In theory, that would avoid a buildup of excess carbon

dioxide, which is what causes the sensation and pain of suffocation when a human is deprived of

oxygen by other means.

92.

If carbon dioxide that the condemned person exhales is trapped under the mask for

the condemned person to inhale, carbon dioxide will build up in the condemned person’s body,

causing him to experience the sensation and pain of suffocation. The Protocol contemplates that

“breathing air” will be supplied to the condemned person after the mask is placed and before

nitrogen is pumped into the mask. Id. §§ X.A.ii, X.A.iv. That means that carbon dioxide can be

trapped under the mask even before nitrogen flows into the mask. There is nothing in the Protocol

to indicate that there is any mechanism to remove the carbon dioxide that the condemned person

exhales that otherwise will be trapped under the mask and can cause suffocation and other dire

consequences. Absent such a mechanism, the theory on which execution by nitrogen hypoxia is

based collapses.

93.

The Protocol also is constitutionally deficient because it does not specify the purity

of the nitrogen gas that will be used or any procedures to test or otherwise determine whether it

has been contaminated. If ADOC uses less than 100% pure nitrogen for a prolonged period of

time, that entails a severe risk of the dire consequences from nitrogen hypoxia. Moreover, even if

ADOC has obtained 100% pure nitrogen for use in executions, the Protocol lacks any information

24

170a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 25 of 37

about testing to ensure the purity, the source of the nitrogen, how it is transported or stored.

Without that information, it is impossible to assess whether there is a risk that the nitrogen has

been contaminated in the process of manufacture, transportation, or storage.

94.

The Protocol also provides that when the condemned person is escorted to the

execution chamber and placed on a gurney a “pulse oximeter will be placed and secured on the

condemned inmate.” Id. § X.A.iii. A pulse oximeter measures the level of oxygen in the blood.

Under the Protocol, an execution team member is responsible for monitoring the pulse oximeter

while the mask is placed and adjusted on the condemned person’s face and for two minutes

thereafter. Id. §§ X.A.v, vi. There are no procedures for monitoring the pulse oximeter after pure

nitrogen is introduced, which could reveal that the execution should be halted because oxygen is

infiltrating the mask and raising the risk of dire consequences short of death.

95.

The Protocol is constitutionally deficient in other respects. It fails to provide

procedures for the unique circumstance of Mr. Smith who survived an attempted execution, has

PTSD, and may experience nausea if he is re-exposed to the traumatizing experience. The Protocol

fails to provide procedures for a condemned person who vomits inside the mask, which might

cause the condemned person to choke.

96.

In addition, the Protocol provides for procedures in the lead up to an execution,

including for notifying the condemned person, providing the condemned person a schedule for the

week of the execution, the “Death Watch observation period,” the placement of the condemned

person in a holding/observation cell, and visitation during the execution week. Id. §§ IV–VIII.

But the Protocol fails to provide procedures and basic safeguards for condemned people like

Mr. Smith who have survived an attempted execution, have PTSD, and may experience

exacerbating symptoms—such as intense psychological distress, extreme panic, or sleep

25

171a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 26 of 37

disruption—as they are forced to re-experience the days and weeks leading up to another execution

attempt.

97.

Instead, ADOC’s procedures exacerbate Mr. Smith’s PTSD. Since November 8,

when the Governor scheduled his planned execution, Mr. Smith has been on “single walk” status,

which means that he cannot share the same space with other Holman inmates—some of whom he

has developed familial relationships with over decades. Ex. 3. Although nothing in the Protocol

addresses “single walk” status, Defendants intend to maintain Mr. Smith isolated from his brothers

on that status for 78 days through his planned execution.

98.

“Single walk” status deprives Mr. Smith of the fellowship of his brother inmates

when he needs their friendship most. It also deprives him of the companionship of his family

during this critical period. Holman has a common visiting space. While Mr. Smith is on “single

walk” status, Mr. Smith’s family cannot schedule a visit with him when any other Holman inmate

has a scheduled visit. Mr. Smith’s “single walk” status also interferes with his relationship with

his counsel when he needs their advice most because their visits are constrained for the same

reason. And while Defendants recently permitted Mr. Smith to select one religious service that he

will be permitted to attend each week accompanied by two corrections officers, his “single walk”

status also burdens the exercise of his religion. Ex. 4.

99.

Finally, the Protocol burdens Mr. Smith’s rights to free speech and to free exercise

of his religion under the First Amendment and violates his rights under RLUIPA. Under the

Protocol, Mr. Smith will be masked as soon as he enters the execution chamber and remain masked

thereafter. Id. § X.A.v. In addition to the other deficiencies associated with the mask, it will

prevent or substantially interfere with Mr. Smith’s ability to make a statement as permitted by the

Protocol, id. § X.A.ix, and to pray audibly as to which “there is a rich history . . . at the time of a

26

172a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 27 of 37

prisoner’s execution, dating back well before the founding of our Nation.” Ramirez v. Collier, 595

U.S. 411, 427 (2022). Any such statement or prayer may not be audible and may risk consequences

associated with dislodging the mask and/or building the level of carbon dioxide under the mask.

100.

Significantly, there may be other problems with the Protocol that are shielded

beneath redactions. But based only on what is disclosed, execution by nitrogen hypoxia using the

procedures in the Protocol poses a severe risk of superadded pain to Mr. Smith.

D

There are Feasible and Available Alternatives to the Protocol

101.

Feasible and available alternative methods of execution exist that would reduce the

risk to Mr. Smith from the Protocol.

102.

ADOC can amend the Protocol to cure its deficiencies by including provisions to:

Measure each condemned person subject to execution by nitrogen hypoxia for a

custom fit mask to reduce the risk that oxygen leaks under the mask or,

alternatively, use a closed space or a hood;

Provide a condemned person an opportunity to speak and to audibly pray without

being masked.

Disclose the training “team members” will receive in placing and adjusting the

mask over the condemned person’s face, their level of experience with the masks

being used, and the metrics that will be used to ensure the mask is “properly placed”

and passes the “final inspection.”

Add a mechanism to remove carbon dioxide that the condemned person exhales

from under the mask.

Disclose the source of the nitrogen to be used, and information about its

transportation and storage to avoid contamination.

27

173a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 28 of 37

Require testing of the nitrogen gas before use to ensure purity of the nitrogen gas.

Add procedures to monitor the pulse oximeter throughout the process.

Add procedures to halt the execution if the condemned person vomits into the mask;

Add procedures for attempting to execute condemned people who have survived a

previous attempt and are experiencing PTSD as a result.

Employ a third-party licensed medical provider who will be permitted (1) to

observe the execution process from the time the condemned person is taken into

the execution chamber until completed, and (2) has the authority to call off or

postpone the execution if, in his or her judgment, the condemned person is at risk

of serious injury short of death.

103.

Alternatively, if Defendants are unwilling or unable to amend the Protocol so that

it complies with constitutional requirements, the firing squad is an available and feasible

alternative that will substantially reduce the risk to Mr. Smith of superadded pain posed by the

Protocol. Utah has a protocol for using a firing squad to carry out executions, which “is

‘sufficiently detailed to permit a finding that the State could carry it out relatively easily and

reasonably quickly.’” Nance v. Comm’r, Ga. Dep’t of Corrs., 59 F.4th 1149, 1155 (11th Cir. 2023)

(quoting Bucklew v. Precythe, 139 S. Ct. 1112, 1129 (2019)); see also Deborah W. Denno, The

Firing Squad as “A Known and Available Alternative Method of Execution” Post-Glossip, 49 U.

Mich. J.L. Reform 749, 778–92 (2016).

28

174a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 29 of 37

CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

First Claim for Relief

Violation of Mr. Smith’s Right to Due Process and to Equal Protection Under the Laws

Under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

104.

Mr. Smith incorporates paragraphs 1 through 101.

105.

At all relevant times, Defendants have been acting under color of state law.

106.

The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides, in relevant part, that

“No State shall . . . deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor

deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” U.S. Const. amend.

XIV, § 1.

107.

It is Defendants’ “‘custom [to] wait[] to move for an inmate’s execution until he

has exhausted his conventional appeals: direct appeal, state postconviction, and federal habeas.”

Woods, 951 F.3d at 1292 (citation omitted in original).

108.

Mr. Smith has not exhausted his appeals.

109.

The State Court Petition is a state postconviction proceeding.

110.

Mr. Smith’s appeal from the dismissal of the State Court Petition is pending in the

Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.

111.

Other condemned people in Alabama who elected to be executed by nitrogen

hypoxia five years ago have exhausted their appeals. See id. at 1291–92.

112.

Defendants sought and obtained authority to execute Mr. Smith by nitrogen

hypoxia even though he has not exhausted his appeals and even though other condemned people

who elected to be executed by nitrogen hypoxia have exhausted their appeals.

113.

Defendants’ actions toward Mr. Smith are arbitrary and capricious and violate its

own stated custom regarding selecting condemned people for execution.

29

175a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 30 of 37

114.

Defendants’ disparate treatment of Mr. Smith is not rationally related to a legitimate

government interest.

115.

Mr. Smith has the right to be treated the same as all other condemned people in

Alabama.

116.

Mr. Smith will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction.

Second Claim for Relief

Violation of Mr. Smith’s Right to be Free from Cruel and Unusual Punishment Under the

Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution

117.

Mr. Smith incorporates paragraphs 1 through 101.

118.

At all relevant times, Defendants have been acting under color of state law.

119.

The Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as applicable to the State through

incorporation into the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, prohibits “cruel and

unusual punishments.” U.S. Const. amend. VIII.

120.

A method of execution violates the Eighth Amendment if “the risk of pain

associated with the State’s method is substantial when compared to a known and available

alternative.” Bucklew, 139 S. Ct. at 1125 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).

121.

The U.S. Supreme Court has described punishments as unconstitutionally cruel

“when they involve torture or a lingering death,” In re Kemmler, 136 U.S. 436, 447 (1890), or

when they “involve the unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain, Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S.

337, 346 (1981). The Eighth Amendment forbids “forms of punishment that intensified the

sentence of death with a (cruel) superadd[ition] of terror, pain, or disgrace.” Bucklew, 139 S. Ct.

at 1124 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted, alterations in original).

30

176a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 31 of 37

122.

Defendants intend to execute Mr. Smith by nitrogen hypoxia using the Protocol,

which would expose Mr. Smith to a severe risk of a persistent vegetative state, a stroke, or the

painful sensation of suffocation, i.e., superadded pain.

123.

There are feasible and available alternatives that would reduce the risk to Mr. Smith

from executing him by nitrogen hypoxia using the Protocol, including amending the Protocol as

indicated in paragraph 100 and execution by firing squad.

124.

Mr. Smith will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction.

Third Claim for Relief

Violation of Mr. Smith’s Right to Freedom of Speech and Free Exercise of His

Religion Under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

125.

Mr. Smith incorporates paragraphs 1 through 101.

126.

At all relevant times, Defendants have been acting under color of state law.

127.

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as applicable to the State through

incorporation into the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, provides, in relevant part,

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free

exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech.”

128.

Defendants’ Protocol provides for Mr. Smith to be masked when he enters the

execution chamber and to remain masked throughout the procedure.

129.

Masking will interfere with Mr. Smith’s right to make an audible statement and to

pray audibly. Any statement or prayer may not be audible and may risk consequences associated

with dislodging the mask and/or building the level of carbon dioxide under the mask.

130.

Mr. Smith will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction.

31

177a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 32 of 37

Fourth Claim for Relief

Violation of Mr. Smith’s Rights Under RLUIPA

131.

Mr. Smith incorporates paragraphs 1 through 101.

132.

At all relevant times, Defendants have been acting under color of state law.

133.

RLUIPA provides: “No government shall impose a substantial burden on the

religious exercise of a person residing in or confined to an institution . . . even if the burden results

from a general applicability, unless the government demonstrates that imposition of the burden on

that person—(1) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and (2) is the least

restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1(a).

134.

“In RLUIPA, in an obvious effort to effect a complete separation from the First

Amendment case law, Congress deleted reference to the First Amendment and defined the

‘exercise of religion’ to include ‘any exercise of religion, whether or not compelled by, or central

to, a system of religious belief.’” Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, 573 U.S. 682, 696 (2014)

(quoting 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-5(7)(A)). RLUIPA thus provides more “expansive protection” for

religious liberty than the United States Supreme Court case law. Holt v. Hobbs, 574 U.S. 352, 358

(2015).

135.

The Protocol that Defendants intend to use to execute Mr. Smith substantially

burdens Mr. Smith’s religious exercise to pray audibly because he will be masked as soon as he

enters the execution chamber which may prevent Mr. Smith’s prayers from being audible.

136.

The Protocol further substantially burdens Mr. Smith’s religious exercise to pray

audibly by forcing Mr. Smith to choose between abstaining from his religious practice of audible

prayer at the end of his life or face the dangerous consequences of dislodging the mask while

32

178a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 33 of 37

praying. See id. at 361 (policy that forced inmate to comply with policy in violation of his religious

beliefs or face disciplinary action substantially burdened inmate’s religious exercise).

137.

Defendants cannot establish that the burden on Mr. Smith’s religious exercise is

justified by a compelling governmental interest and, even if they could, cannot establish that the

burden on Mr. Smith’s religious exercise is the least restrictive means to further any purported

compelling governmental interest. See id. at 362.

138.

Mr. Smith will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction.

Fifth Claim for Relief

Violation of Mr. Smith’s Rights Under ARFA

139.

Mr. Smith incorporates paragraphs 1 through 101.

140.

At all relevant times, Defendants have been acting under color.

141.

ARFA provides: “Government shall not burden a person’s freedom of religion even

if the burden results from a general rule of applicability, except . . . if it demonstrates that

application of the burden to the person (1) Is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest;

and (2) Is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest.” Ala.

Const. art. I, § 3.01(V).

142.

The Protocol that Defendants intend to use to execute Mr. Smith burdens

Mr. Smith’s religious exercise to pray audibly because he will be masked as soon as he enters the

execution chamber which may prevent Mr. Smith’s prayers from being audible.

143.

The Protocol further burdens Mr. Smith’s religious exercise to pray audibly by

forcing Mr. Smith to choose between abstaining from his religious practice of audible prayer at

the end of his life or face the dangerous consequences of dislodging the mask while praying. See

33

179a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 34 of 37

id. at 361 (policy that forced inmate to comply with policy in violation of his religious beliefs or

face disciplinary action substantially burdened inmate’s religious exercise).

144.

Defendants cannot establish that the burden on Mr. Smith’s religious exercise is

justified by a compelling governmental interest and, even if they could, cannot establish that the

burden on Mr. Smith’s religious exercise is the least restrictive means to further any purported

compelling governmental interest. See id. at 362.

145.

Mr. Smith will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Mr. Smith respectfully requests that this Court grant the following relief:

1. With respect to the First Claim for Relief,

a. A declaration that attempting to execute Mr. Smith by nitrogen hypoxia before

he has exhausted his pending appeals would violate his right to equal protection

under the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

b. A preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting Defendants from executing

Mr. Smith by nitrogen hypoxia until he has exhausted his pending appeals or,

alternatively, a stay of execution pending completion of Mr. Smith’s appeals.

2.

With respect to the Second Claim for Relief,

a. A declaration that attempting to execute Mr. Smith by nitrogen hypoxia using

the procedures outlined in the Protocol would violate his right to be free from

cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to

the U.S. Constitution.

b. A preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting Defendants from executing

Mr. Smith by nitrogen hypoxia using the procedures outlined in the Protocol.

34

180a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 35 of 37

3. With respect to the Third Claim for Relief,

a. A declaration that attempting to execute Mr. Smith by nitrogen hypoxia using

the Protocol would violate his right to freedom of speech and free exercise of

his religion under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

b. A preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting Defendants from

attempting to execute Mr. Smith by nitrogen hypoxia using the Protocol.

4. With respect to the Fourth Claim for Relief,

a. A declaration that attempting to execute Mr. Smith by nitrogen hypoxia under

the current Protocol would substantially burden his right to religious exercise

under RLUIPA.

b. A preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting Defendants from

attempting to execute Mr. Smith by nitrogen hypoxia using the Protocol.

5. With respect to the Fifth Claim for Relief,

a. A declaration that attempting to execute Mr. Smith by nitrogen hypoxia under

the current Protocol would burden his right to religious exercise under ARFA.

b. A preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting Defendants from

attempting to execute Mr. Smith by nitrogen hypoxia using the Protocol.

6. Such other relief as this Court deems just and proper.

Respectfully submitted, this 20th day of November, 2023.

__/s/ Andrew B. Johnson_______________

Andrew B. Johnson

BRADLEY ARANT BOULT

CUMMINGS LLP

1819 Fifth Avenue North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

35

181a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 36 of 37

(205) 521-8000

ajohnson@bradley.com

Jeffrey H. Horowitz*

David A. Kerschner*

Robert M. Grass*

ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE

SCHOLER LLP

250 West 55th Street

New York, New York 10019-9710

(212) 836-8000

jeffrey.horowitz@arnoldporter.com

david.kerschner@arnoldporter.com

robert.grass@arnoldporter.com

Ashley Burkett*

Angelique Ciliberti (ASB: 1504-T44C)

ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE

SCHOLER LLP

601 Massachusetts Ave., NW

Washington, DC 20001-3743

(202) 942-5000

ashley.burkett@arnoldporter.com

angelique.ciliberti@arnoldporter.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff Kenneth Eugene Smith

*admitted pro hac vice

36

182a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 31 Filed 11/28/23 Page 37 of 37

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on November 28, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of

the Court using the Pacer system, which will send notification to the following:

Richard D. Anderson

Assistant Attorney General

Office of the Attorney General

Capital Litigation Division

501 Washington Avenue

Montgomery, AL 36130

Richard.Anderson@AlabamaAG.gov

Attorney for Defendants

__/s/ Andrew B. Johnson_______________

Of Counsel

37

183a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 1 of 52

EXHIBIT A

184a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 2 of 52

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

KENNETH EUGENE SMITH

)

)

Plaintiff,

)

)

v.

)

)

JOHN Q. HAMM, Commissioner, Alabama )

Department of Corrections, and

)

)

TERRY RAYBON, in his official

)

Capacity as Warden, Holman

)

Correctional Facility,

)

)

Case No. 2:23-cv-00656-RAH

CAPITAL CASE

EXECUTION SCHEDULED FOR

JANUARY 25, 2024

DECLARATION OF ROBERT JASON YONG, M.D. IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I, Robert Jason Yong, declare under penalty of perjury as follows:

I have been asked by Arnold & Porter to provide an expert review on nitrogen hypoxia.

Specifically, in preparing this report, I have referenced textbooks, journal articles, guidelines, and

the Alabama Department of Corrections’ Execution Protocol for Nitrogen Hypoxia dated August

2023 (the Protocol).

I also rely on my medical training and clinical experience as an

anesthesiologist. My expert opinions on the subject are set forth below. All the opinions stated in

this medical report are stated to a reasonable degree of medical certainty.

I.

Qualifications

I am the Chief of Pain Medicine and serve as the Medical Director of the Pain Management

Center at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, which is affiliated with

Harvard Medical School. I am on the faculty of Harvard Medical School, where I am an Assistant

Professor in Anesthesia. In 2014, 2015, 2016, 2018, 2020, 2021, and 2023, I was awarded the

Pain Attending of the Year Award for the Department of Anesthesiology at Brigham and Women’s

1

185a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 3 of 52

Hospital. Prior to this, I was an Assistant Professor at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore,

Maryland, where I was awarded Outstanding Teacher of the Year, Department of Anesthesiology

in 2013.

I obtained my Medical Degree from Baylor College of Medicine. I completed my

residency in anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, and pain medicine at Brigham and Women’s

Hospital, Harvard Medical School. As a resident at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, I received

recognition as the Distinguished Resident of the Year and was selected as a Foundation for

Anesthesia Education and Research (FAER) Practice Management Scholar. During my last year

of residency, I was elected as a Chief Resident of the Anesthesiology Department. Following

residency, I completed a fellowship in Pain Medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard

Medical School. I am licensed to practice medicine in Massachusetts and double-board certified

in Anesthesiology and Pain Management.

I have significant expertise with the subject matter of this case. I have substantial

knowledge, training, and experience in the physiology and pathophysiology of the respiratory

system and ventilation. I have over 10 years of experience managing the airways of patients while

monitoring and managing their ventilation. As an anesthesiologist managing adequate oxygen

levels around the time of surgery is paramount, and I have developed substantial experience

monitoring and maintaining oxygen levels. I have a deep understanding of physiology and

pharmacology with board certification in Anesthesiology.

Attached as Exhibit 1 is a list of references considered in preparing my report. My CV is

attached hereto as Exhibit 2.

I reserve the right to supplement or amend my opinions based upon any new information

or medical literature that subsequently becomes available to me. I further reserve the right to

2

186a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 4 of 52

comment on any opinions offered by defendants’ experts submitted in briefing, or at deposition or

hearings.

In addition, I reserve the right to discuss general concepts within the field of

Anesthesiology to provide context for any of the opinions discussed in this report. Finally, I

reserve the right to use graphics or demonstratives at hearings to illustrate the concepts discussed

in my report.

I submit this Declaration in support of Kenneth Eugene Smith’s Motion for Preliminary

Injunction.

II.

Background

A.

Anatomy and Physiology

The human circulatory system or cardiovascular system allows the flow of blood

throughout the body. The blood transports nutrients and oxygen to the tissues and carries carbon

dioxide and waste products away to be metabolized or excreted. The heart serves as the main

pump moving blood to the vital organs, including the heart, lungs, kidneys, liver, and brain 1.

The human respiratory system allows the exchange of vital gasses via the lungs into the

bloodstream2. The gasses enter the respiratory system via the nose or mouth and pass through the

trachea before branching into the bronchi then bronchioles and finally the alveoli. The blood from

the right side of the heart pumps into the lungs and back to the left side of the heart before

circulating through the rest of the body. As blood flows from the heart to the lungs, the blood

vessels branch into smaller and smaller vessels ending as capillaries that surround the alveoli. It

is at the level of the alveoli that gasses are exchanged from the air to the blood stream.

1

InformedHealth.org [Internet]. Cologne, Germany: Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG);

2006-. How does the blood circulatory system work? 2010 Mar 12 [Updated 2019 Jan 31]. Available from:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279250/

2

Patwa A, Shah A. Anatomy and physiology of respiratory system relevant to anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2015

Sep;59(9):533-41. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.165849. PMID: 26556911; PMCID: PMC4613399.

3

187a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 5 of 52

Inspired room air is comprised of nitrogen (~78%), oxygen (~21%), argon (~0.9%), carbon

dioxide (0.035%), and other gasses. The gradient of particular gasses in the alveoli compared to

the bloodstream allows for gasses to be exchanged from the air to the blood. In normal states,

oxygen is delivered to the blood and carbon dioxide is taken out of the blood.

The cells in humans require the oxygen for normal physiologic functioning 3. Hypoxemia

describes a condition in which there is a lower-than-normal level of oxygen in the blood. It occurs

when the oxygen saturation in the bloodstream is below the expected or necessary levels for the

body to function correctly. Hypoxia describes a state in which the cells have insufficient oxygen

to maintain normal functioning, while hypoxemia refers specifically to low oxygen levels in the

blood. An individual experiencing hypoxemia or hypoxia is still capable of exhaling carbon

dioxide. By contrast, asphyxia describes the inability to inhale oxygen and the inability to exhale

carbon dioxide. Being unable to exhale excess carbon dioxide leads to a higher-than-normal level

of carbon dioxide in the blood, a state known as hypercarbia. Asphyxia, and resulting hypercarbia,

can lead to the distressing physical sensation of suffocation.

B.

Nitrogen hypoxemia

Nitrogen hypoxemia is a condition that can occur when a person is exposed to very highor very low-pressure environments, such as deep-sea diving or high-altitude locations. Nitrogen

hypoxemia occurs when the increased pressure causes the body to take in more nitrogen than usual,

which can dilute the amount of oxygen available for the body's tissues and cells. This can lead to

a decrease in the body's oxygen levels, resulting in symptoms like dizziness, confusion, shortness

of breath, and, in severe cases, even loss of consciousness.

3

Ortiz-Prado E, Dunn JF, Vasconez J, Castillo D, Viscor G. Partial pressure of oxygen in the human body: a general

review. Am J Blood Res. 2019 Feb 15;9(1):1-14. PMID: 30899601; PMCID: PMC6420699.

4

188a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 6 of 52

Insufficient blood oxygen (hypoxemia) leads to tissue damage and catastrophic damage to

vital organs4. There are many causes of hypoxemia including anemia, acute respiratory distress

syndrome, heart failure, etc. The brain has substantial energy demands, making it particularly

susceptible to the effects of low oxygen in its cells (hypoxia). Despite its small size relative to the

entire body, the brain consumes a significant portion of the oxygen supply (approximately 20%).

Normally, when the brain requires more oxygen, the body responds by increasing blood flow to

meet this demand. However, both hypoxemia and reduced blood supply (ischemia) can result in

damage to the brain. The longer the brain is deprived of adequate oxygen or blood flow, the more

extensive and widespread the resulting damage becomes. Specific regions of the brain, including

the brainstem, hippocampus, and cerebral cortex, are particularly vulnerable to this type of injury.

This damage can become permanent unless oxygen levels are promptly restored. When oxygen

levels are insufficient, brain cells can undergo cell death, primarily through a process called

necrosis, and delayed cell death known as apoptosis may also occur 5. Environments deficient in

oxygen can result in nausea, vomiting, dizziness, confusion, and impaired judgement 6.

Breathing in 100% nitrogen gas would result in hypoxemia, eventual end-organ damage,

and ultimately death. However, there is a lack of data regarding exactly how long a person must

be exposed to 100% nitrogen to lead to death, or what happens at exposures to slightly less than

100% nitrogen for prolonged periods of time. As noted below, if a person is exposed to less than

100% nitrogen, there is a risk that the person could transition to a persistent vegetative state, have

a stroke, or experience the painful sensation of suffocation instead of dying.

4

Michiels C. Physiological and pathological responses to hypoxia. Am J Pathol. 2004 Jun;164(6):1875-82. doi:

10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63747-9. PMID: 15161623; PMCID: PMC1615763.

5

Michiels C. Physiological and pathological responses to hypoxia. Am J Pathol. 2004 Jun;164(6):1875-82. doi:

10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63747-9. PMID: 15161623; PMCID: PMC1615763.

6

Harding BE, Wolf BC. Case report of suicide by inhalation of nitrogen gas. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2008

Sep;29(3):235-7. doi: 10.1097/PAF.0b013e318183240c. PMID: 18725778.

5

189a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 7 of 52

C.

Challenges with nitrogen hypoxemia

a.

Challenges With Using Masks To Administer Gas

During administration of anesthetics in the operating room, the anesthesiologist's job is to

reduce the risk that a patient experiences hypoxemia before the anesthesia becomes fully effective.

In a clinical setting, patients are typically "pre-oxygenated" before receiving anesthesia: The mask

is filled with 100% oxygen to flood the body's cells with oxygen. After pre-oxygenation, the

patient can be delivered anesthesia via the mask or intravenously. Once the patient is no longer

able to breathe independently, the anesthesiologist mask-ventilates the patient for the duration of

the anesthesia.

When pre-oxygenating a patient, the priority is on ensuring the mask has a tight fit to make

sure there is no leakage and that the maximum amount of oxygen is delivered to the patient. Masks

generally come in a few sizes. Oftentimes, mask ventilation can be difficult if the mask does not

appropriately fit7. Variations in nose structure, facial hair, obesity, and other anatomic variability

can increase the difficulty of mask ventilation.

While mask ventilating a patient during anesthesia, the most common set-up places the

anesthesiologist’s left hand on the mask securing it to the patient’s face and the right hand on the

ventilation bag. The left hand is positioned such that the thumb is on the upper portion of the mask

placing downward pressure on the nasal bridge, the pointer and middle fingers are placed on the

lower portion of the mask placing downward pressure on the chin, and the ring finger and pinky

are positioned on the patient’s jaw or mentum applying upward pressure against the mask to create

a tight seal. In a clinical setting, the anesthesiologist is close to the patient, holding the mask in

7

Kapoor MC, Rana S, Singh AK, Vishal V, Sikdar I. Nasal mask ventilation is better than face mask ventilation in

edentulous patients. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jul-Sep;32(3):314-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.168262.

PMID: 27625477; PMCID: PMC5009835.

6

190a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 8 of 52

position and, at times, manually squeezing the ventilation bag. If there is a poor mask seal, the

anesthesiologist would be in a position to feel air leaking out around the mask.

An alternative set-up utilizes straps around the back of the patient’s head that attach to the

mask and secure it to the patient’s face without the anesthesiologist needing to hold the mask in

place manually. Straps can be used if the patient is cooperative and has normal anatomy.

However, if a patient resists or turns their head the mask can be dislodged or the seal broken.

Because of these limitations with straps, the preferred practice is to have the anesthesiologist hold

the mask.

In addition to pre-oxygenating a patient, masks are sometimes used in clinical practice to

apply anesthesia directly. The mask is fitted to a person while they are conscious (whether by

straps or otherwise), and then the person loses consciousness, which causes changes to the face as

the facial muscles relax. These facial changes can cause the mask to dislodge or the seal to be

broken. In a clinical setting, an anesthesiologist will be able to adjust their hand position or adjust

the mask as the patient loses consciousness to ensure the seal is not broken. Additionally, when

administering anesthesia, a broken seal that allows for the incursion of some oxygen entering the

patient’s mask is acceptable because the goal is not to completely limit the patient’s oxygen levels.

Anesthesiology breathing circuits that have inspiratory and expiratory elements contain a

“scrubber,” an apparatus to eliminate carbon dioxide from the mask when the patient exhales (see

Figure 1 below). Regardless of what mix of gasses a person inhales through a breathing circuit,

normal physiological processes mean that a person will always continue to exhale carbon dioxide.

Scrubbing carbon dioxide from the patient’s air is essential to avoid re-breathing exhaled carbon

dioxide, which could cause asphyxiation, hypercarbia, and the sensation of suffocation. The

scrubber removes carbon dioxide from the mask by absorbing and storing it; a common carbon

7

191a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 9 of 52

dioxide-specific absorber is soda lime, a combination of sodium hydroxide and calcium hydroxide.

Without a mechanism to remove carbon dioxide, a person may experience asphyxiation and the

sensation of suffocation.

Figure 1: Example of carbon dioxide “scrubber” in a mechanical ventilation system with

inspiratory and expiratory elements8.

If a patient vomits into a mask during the administration of anesthesia, anesthesiologists

use suction to remove any vomit from inside the mask. Often this requires removing the mask in

order to properly suction out all material, to ensure the patient does not inhale and choke on their

own vomit. The mask would then be cleaned or exchanged for a new mask.

b.

Alabama Department of Corrections’ Execution Protocol for

Nitrogen Hypoxia

I have reviewed a redacted copy of the Protocol and the accompanying spiritual advisor

waiver form. While the Protocol is heavily redacted, making it difficult to assess the complete

8

George Mychaskiw II, Scott C. Carriker, Richard G. Cipolli, Measurement of Expiratory Limb Circuit Pressure: A

Potential Anesthesia Machine Safety Issue, 25 Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation Newsletter 2 (Summer 2010),

https://www.apsf.org/article/measurement-of-expiratory-limb-circuit-pressure-a-potential-anesthesia-machinesafety-issue/.

8

192a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 10 of 52

process, based on the information provided I have identified several areas of concern. Each

concern could result in the condemned person being transitioned to a persistent vegetative state,

having a stroke, experiencing the painful sensation of suffocation, choking on aspirated vomit, or

other complications if not properly rectified.

First, the Protocol does not provide adequate detail on the mechanism of delivery of the

nitrogen or how a mask would be maintained in position throughout the process. If protocols are

designed based on normal, standard operating procedures for the delivery of gasses, then there is

likely an assumption of patient compliance and minimal movement. Without patient compliance

and minimal movement, it is difficult to ensure that a mask will remain sealed and in the correct

position.

Delivery of nitrogen gas would require a closed chamber or a tightly sealed mask. The

Protocol provides little information on what is being done to secure the mask and confirm a tight

seal. The Protocol notes that a mask will be placed and adjusted on the condemned person’s face

and that there will be a final inspection of the mask, but there is no information on how this will

be done, the training of the persons(s) performing the inspection, what the inspection is looking

for, and what (if anything) will be done if the team determines there is not a closed seal. The

movement of the condemned person while speaking or otherwise moving their head, including

small mouth movements such as quiet but audible prayer, along with changes to the facial muscles

when they lose consciousness, may result in an imperfect seal resulting in leaking. The Protocol

calls for the condemned person to give his final statement after the mask has been placed on him.

Following the final statement, the Protocol indicates that team members will conduct a final

inspection of the mask to verify proper placement. However, there is no information about how

the team will monitor the seal of the mask once the nitrogen hypoxia system is activated.

9

193a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 11 of 52

If a mask does not fit or the chamber is not completely closed, entrainment of room air can

occur allowing for some oxygen to be inspired. A mandatory waiver for spiritual providers

remaining in the room highlights the possibility that nitrogen could leak into the room during the

execution. If nitrogen can leak out of the mask, that would inversely mean that room air containing

oxygen could be entrained into the mask. In the hospital setting, small amount of oxygen entering

the patient’s mask is acceptable because the patient is receiving breathable air. In contrast, in an

execution by nitrogen hypoxia setting, breathing oxygen would likely prolong the time to reach

unconsciousness which could lead to a persistent vegetative state or other complications.

In addition to a tight seal, a mask system must include a scrubber to remove carbon dioxide

from the air the condemned person exhales. The Protocol does not specify whether the mask

includes a carbon dioxide scrubber or any other mechanism to remove excess carbon dioxide. If

the mask does not include a scrubber, the condemned person could re-breathe carbon dioxide and

experience hypercarbia, asphyxiation, and the painful sensation of suffocation.

Second, the Protocol does not take into account what will happen if the condemned person

vomits into the mask or has a seizure. As noted above, environments deficient in oxygen can result

in nausea and vomiting. If vomit is not cleared from the mask, the condemned person could inhale

the vomit and asphyxiate, resulting in painful physical sensations of choking and suffocation. The

Protocol provides no instructions for clearing vomit out of the mask.

The Protocol also does not specify what should be done in the event of a seizure, either to

ensure the mask remains secured to the condemned person’s face despite the rapid movements

associated with seizures or to identify criteria to stop the process of nitrogen administration if there

is a risk the condemned person will not die but rather enter a persistent vegetative state or other

damage short of death. Given the lack of data on nitrogen hypoxemia, the risk of vomiting or

10

194a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 12 of 52

seizure is unknown. However, the fact that the Protocol does not account for any risk of vomiting

or seizure further indicates that the current Protocol is insufficient for humane administration of

nitrogen hypoxia.

Third, the Protocol does not specify the purity of the nitrogen gas to be used. To the extent,

the Protocol calls for anything less than 100% nitrogen gas then the condemned may transition to

a persistent vegetative state, have a stroke, experience the painful sensation of suffocation or suffer

other complications. Likewise, there is no discussion on what testing is performed to ensure purity

of the gas being used, nor is there any information on where the nitrogen is sourced and how it is

transported or stored. In a clinical setting, when we provide oxygen or any other type of gas to a

patient, there are procedures in place to confirm the quality of the product and make sure it is

transported and stored in an appropriate manner to avoid problems such as possible contamination.

Fourth, the Protocol does not provide for continued monitoring of blood oxygen levels or

the condemned person’s heart rate as the nitrogen is being administered, in order to assess whether

the blood oxygen levels are reducing as planned. The Protocol states that a pulse oximeter, which

reads blood oxygen levels, will be affixed to the condemned person before administration of

nitrogen and will be monitored for two minutes. However, the Protocol provides no information

on how blood oxygen levels or the condemned person’s heart rate will be monitored after

administration of nitrogen begins. Nor does the Protocol establish criteria for shutting down the

nitrogen hypoxia system if the condemned person’s blood oxygen or pulse gets low but not low

enough to cause death. Given the lack of scientific data about blood oxygen levels necessary to

cause death, the Protocol’s failure to monitor blood oxygen levels and heart rate after nitrogen

administration puts the condemned person at risk of entering a permanent vegetative state or

experiencing other physiological damage short of death.

11

195a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 13 of 52

Lastly, there is a dearth of research regarding pain or sensations felt during nitrogen

hypoxemia, and major questions remain for how long to administer 100% nitrogen before death

occurs. The American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) has determined nitrogen hypoxia

is acceptable for euthanasia of pigs but “is unacceptable for other mammals.” 9 According to the

AVMA euthanasia guidelines, nitrogen “create[s] an anoxic environment that is distressing for

some species.”10 If incomplete or unsuccessful, one potential outcome is a transition to a persistent

vegetative state.

D.

Sensation of Suffocation

Suffocation refers to the state or process of dying as a result of being asphyxiated, which

occurs when a person can neither inhale oxygen nor exhale carbon dioxide. An inability to rid the

body of excess carbon dioxide leads to an accumulation of carbon dioxide in the blood

(hypercarbia). When blood carbon dioxide levels rise too high, the blood pH levels become more

acidic in a process called respiratory acidosis. The physical sensations associated with respiratory

acidosis include anxiety, confusion, headache, drowsiness, and stupor 11.

E.

Persistent Vegetative State

A persistent vegetative state (PVS) is a medical condition characterized by a profound and

long-lasting loss of consciousness and cognitive function 12. In PVS, individuals appear to be awake

but lack awareness of themselves or their surroundings. They may have cycles of sleep and

9

American Veterinary Medical Association, AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2020 Edition, at 28.

American Veterinary Medical Association, AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2020 Edition, at 28.

11

James L. Lewis III. Respiratory Acidosis. Merck Manual: Professional Version (Jul. 2023),

https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/endocrine-and-metabolic-disorders/acid-base-regulation-anddisorders/respiratory-acidosis.

12

Zeman A. Persistent vegetative state. Lancet. 1997 Sep 13;350(9080):795-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)064477. PMID: 9298013.

10

12

196a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 14 of 52

wakefulness but do not exhibit purposeful responses to their environment or communicate in

meaningful ways.

People in a persistent vegetative state experience significant damage to the cerebral cortex,

the part of the brain responsible for conscious thought, perception, and decision-making. This

damage results in the loss of cognitive functions like awareness, reasoning, and memory. Despite

the loss of higher brain functions, individuals in a PVS may retain some basic bodily functions

such as breathing, digestion, and reflexes. They may appear to move, make noises, or even open

their eyes, but these actions are typically involuntary and not indicative of consciousness. The

prognosis for individuals in a persistent vegetative state is generally poor. While some may

recover partially or regain minimal awareness, many do not show significant improvement over

time. PVS is often considered a long-term or permanent condition. The care of patients in PVS

requires feeding, bathing, housing, and the personnel required to carry out those tasks. Costs of

caring for individuals in a persistent vegetative state are estimated to be >$90,000 per year 13.

F.

Stroke

If the patient does not develop PVS, an alternative scenario would be the development of

a stroke where part of the brain is damaged. Depending on the area damaged, the residual effect

could be failure of speech, movement of limbs, alterations of any of the senses, and much more.

On average, the lifetime cost of stroke per person is estimated to be >$100,000 14.

13

Fields AI, Coble DH, Pollack MM, Cuerdon TT, Kaufman J. Outcomes of children in a persistent vegetative state.

Crit Care Med. 1993 Dec;21(12):1890-4. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199312000-00016. PMID: 8252894.

14

Taylor TN, Davis PH, Torner JC, Holmes J, Meyer JW, Jacobson MF. Lifetime cost of stroke in the United States.

Stroke. 1996;27:1459–1466. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.27.9.1459. See also Johnson BH, Bonafede MM,

Watson C. Short- and longer-term health-care resource utilization and costs associated with acute ischemic stroke.

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016; 8:53-61. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S95662. PMCID: PMC4770080. PMID: 26966382.

(estimating $140,048 lifetime cost for ischemic strokes).

13

197a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 15 of 52

My engagement is ongoing, and should any additional material information become

available to me, I reserve the right to modify or supplement my conclusions and opinions. The

opinions expressed in this Declaration are my own and are made to a reasonable degree of medical

certainty. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1746.

Executed on this 17th day of November 2023,

R. Jason Yong, MD MBA

14

198a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 16 of 52

EXHIBIT 1

US 175044333v1

199a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 17 of 52

Exhibit 1: Materials Considered List

Alabama Department of Corrections, Execution Protocol for Nitrogen Hypoxia (Aug. 2023).

American Veterinary Medical Association, AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2020

Edition, at 28.

Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters, Standards for Basic Anesthetic Monitoring,

American Society of Anesthesiologists (Dec. 13, 2020), https://www.asahq.org/standards-andpractice-parameters/standards-for-basic-anesthetic-monitoring.

Fields AI, Coble DH, Pollack MM, Cuerdon TT, Kaufman J. Outcomes of children in a persistent

vegetative state. Crit Care Med. 1993 Dec;21(12):1890-4. doi: 10.1097/00003246-19931200000016. PMID: 8252894.

George Mychaskiw II, Scott C. Carriker, Richard G. Cipolli, Measurement of Expiratory Limb

Circuit Pressure: A Potential Anesthesia Machine Safety Issue, 25 Anesthesia Patient Safety

Foundation Newsletter 2 (Summer 2010), https://www.apsf.org/article/measurement-of-expiratorylimb-circuit-pressure-a-potential-anesthesia-machine-safety-issue/.

Harding BE, Wolf BC. Case report of suicide by inhalation of nitrogen gas. Am J Forensic Med

Pathol. 2008 Sep;29(3):235-7. doi: 10.1097/PAF.0b013e318183240c. PMID: 18725778.

InformedHealth.org [Internet]. Cologne, Germany: Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health

Care (IQWiG); 2006-. How does the blood circulatory system work? 2010 Mar 12 [Updated 2019

Jan 31]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279250/

James L. Lewis III, Respiratory Acidosis, Merck Manual: Professional Version (Jul. 2023),

https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/endocrine-and-metabolic-disorders/acid-baseregulation-and-disorders/respiratory-acidosis.

Johnson BH, Bonafede MM, Watson C. Short- and longer-term health-care resource utilization and

costs associated with acute ischemic stroke. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016; 8:53-61. doi:

10.2147/CEOR.S95662. PMCID: PMC4770080. PMID: 26966382. (estimating $140,048 lifetime

cost for ischemic strokes).

Kapoor MC, Rana S, Singh AK, Vishal V, Sikdar I. Nasal mask ventilation is better than face mask

ventilation in edentulous patients. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jul-Sep;32(3):314-8. doi:

10.4103/0970-9185.168262. PMID: 27625477; PMCID: PMC5009835.

Michiels C. Physiological and pathological responses to hypoxia. Am J Pathol. 2004

Jun;164(6):1875-82. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63747-9. PMID: 15161623; PMCID:

PMC1615763.

Morgan & Mikhail's Clinical Anesthesiology (John F. Butterworth IV, et al., eds., 7th ed. 2022).

15

200a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 18 of 52

Ortiz-Prado E, Dunn JF, Vasconez J, Castillo D, Viscor G. Partial pressure of oxygen in the human

body: a general review. Am J Blood Res. 2019 Feb 15;9(1):1-14. PMID: 30899601; PMCID:

PMC6420699.

Patwa A, Shah A. Anatomy and physiology of respiratory system relevant to anaesthesia. Indian J

Anaesth. 2015 Sep;59(9):533-41. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.165849. PMID: 26556911; PMCID:

PMC4613399.

Stoelting's Anesthesia and Co-Existing Disease (Roberta L. Hines & Stephanie B. Jones, eds., 8th

ed. 2022).

Taylor TN, Davis PH, Torner JC, Holmes J, Meyer JW, Jacobson MF. Lifetime cost of stroke in the

United States. Stroke. 1996;27:1459–1466. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.27.9.1459.

Zeman A. Persistent vegetative state. Lancet. 1997 Sep 13;350(9080):795-9. doi: 10.1016/S01406736(97)06447-7. PMID: 9298013.

16

201a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 19 of 52

EXHIBIT 2

US 175044333v1

202a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 20 of 52

203a

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 21 of 52

2012-2013

Assistant Professor

Anesthesia

Johns Hopkins Medical

School, Baltimore, MD

2013-2019

Instructor

Anaesthesia

Harvard Medical School,

Boston, MA

2019-

Assistant Professor

Anaesthesia

Harvard Medical School,

Boston, MA

Appointments at Hospitals/Affiliated Institutions:

2012-2013

Attending

Anesthesia

Johns Hopkins Hospital

2013-

Attending

Anesthesia

Brigham & Women's

Hospital

Other Professional Positions:

2016-2020

Scientific Advisory

Board

axialHealthcare

12 days per year

2016-

Consultant

Medtronic

2 days per year

2017-

Consultant

Nevro

2 days per year

2019-2021

Consultant

Endo Pharmaceuticals

12 days per year

2019-

Consultant

Abbott

2 days per year

Major Administrative Leadership Positions:

Local

2013-2017

Founding Medical Director of Pain

Management

Brigham and Women’s Faulkner

Hospital

2013-

Founding Co-Director, Spine Center

Brigham and Women’s Faulkner

Hospital

2014-2021

Associate Program Director of Pain

Management

Brigham and Women’s Hospital

2014-

Co-founder and Facilitator: Fellow

Lecture Series

Brigham and Women’s Faulkner

204a

2

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 22 of 52

2017-

Medical Director of Pain Management

Center

Brigham and Women’s Hospital

2020-2021

Associate Chief of Pain Medicine

Division

Brigham and Women’s Hospital

2021-2023

Chief of Pain Medicine Division

Brigham and Women’s Hospital

2023-

Associate Chief of Pain Medicine

Division

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Committee Service:

Local

2010-2011

Residency Admissions Interview

Committee

Department Anesthesiology, Brigham

and Women’s Hospital

2012-2013

Residency Admissions Interview

Committee

Department Anesthesiology, Johns

Hopkins Hospital

2013-2015

Medical Executive Committee

Brigham and Women’s Faulkner

2013-

Fellowship Admissions Interview

Committee

Brigham and Women’s Hospital

2014-

Ambulatory Advisory Council

Brigham and Women’s Faulkner

2014-

Pain Fellowship Clinical Competency

Committee

Brigham and Women’s Hospital

2014-

Program Evaluation Committee

Brigham and Women’s Hospital

2015-2018

Opioid Management Subcommittee

Brigham and Women’s Faulkner

2015-2019

Opiate Ad Hoc Committee

Harvard Medical School

2016-2020

Office for Multicultural Careers Advisory

Committee

Brigham and Women’s Hospital

2016-

B CORE Standards Committee

Brigham and Women’s Faulkner

2017-

Residency Admissions Committee

Brigham and Women’s Hospital

205a

3

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 23 of 52

2017-

Residency Clinical Competency

Committee

Brigham and Women’s Hospital

2019-

Faculty Board, Department of

Anesthesiology

Brigham and Women’s Hospital

2014-

Program Director Committee,

Representing BWH Pain Medicine

Fellowship

American Board of Anesthesiology

2016-

MOCA Minute: Pain Medicine

Subcommittee

American Board of Anesthesiology

2022-2022

Program and Evaluation Committee,

Summer 2022 Meeting

Eastern Pain Association

2023-2023

Program and Evaluation Committee

Chair, Annual Meeting

Eastern Pain Association

National

Professional Societies:

2007-2012

American Medical Association

2007-

American Society of Anesthesiologists

2007-

Massachusetts Medical Association

2007-

Massachusetts Society of

Anesthesiologists

2011-2019

American Pain Society

2014-2016

International Spine Intervention Society

2014-

American Academy of Pain Medicine

2014-

American Society of Interventional Pain

Physicians

2016

American Society of Regional

Anesthesia

206a

4

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 24 of 52

2016-

North American Neuromodulation

Society

2018-

Boston Pain Society

2018-

Board of Directors

2023-2025

Co-Director of Fundraising and Industry

Relations

Eastern Pain Association

2021-

Editorial Activities:

Ad hoc Reviewer

Headache Journal

The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation

Pain Practice

Spine Journal

Other Editorial Roles

2017

Editor in Chief

2020

Pain Medicine: An Essential Review, 1st

Ed. Springer International

Editor

Honors and Prizes:

1998

Texas Valedictorian

Scholarship, Texas

Interventional Management of Chronic

Visceral Pain Syndromes, 1st Ed.

Elsevier, 2020

University of Texas, Austin,

TX

2002

Baylor College of

Medicine Community

Service Scholarship

Baylor College of Medicine,

Houston, Texas

2005

Rice University’s

Jones Graduate

School of

Rice University, Jones

Graduate School of

Management,, Houston, TX

207a

5

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 25 of 52

Management

Academic Scholarship

2011

Distinguished

Resident of the Year

Anesthesia Department,

Brigham & Women’s

Hospital, Boston, MA

2011

Foundation for

Anesthesia Education

and Research (FAER)

Practice Management

Resident Scholar Program,

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

2011

Grant Finalist, Center

for Integration of

Medicine and

Innovative

Technology (CIMIT)

Research

CIMIT, Boston, MA

2011

National Collegiate

Inventors and

Innovators Alliance

Award for

participation in the

Ventures Lab

Venture Lab, Cambridge, MA

2011

Young Innovator

Award

Harvard School of

Engineering & Applied

Science, Boston, MA

2013

Distinguished

Intraoperative

Teaching and Clinical

Mentorship

Department of

Anesthesiology, Johns

Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore,

MD

2013

Outstanding Teacher

of the Year

Department of

Anesthesiology, Johns

Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore,

MD

2014, 2015,

2016, 2020,

2021

Pain Attending of the

Year Award

Department of

Anesthesiology, Brigham and

208a

6

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 26 of 52

Women’s Hospital, Boston,

MA

2014, 2018

Partners in Excellence

Award for Leadership

and Innovation

Brigham and Women’s

Hospital, Boston, MA

2018

Outstanding

Mentoring Award

Department of

Anesthesiology, Brigham and

Women’s Hospital, Boston,

MA

2018

Pain Attending of the

Year Award,

Department of

Anesthesiology, Brigham and

Women’s Hospital, Boston,

MA

2023

Pain Attending of the

Year Award

Anesthesia Department,

Brigham & Women's Hospital,

Boston, MA

Report of Funded and Unfunded Projects

Past

2015-2019

Prediction of

Persistent PostMastectomy Pain

Prediction of Persistent Post-Mastectomy Pain

NIH (NIGMS); K23 GM110540

Co-Investigator (PI: K. Schreiber)

This project investigates the ability of preoperatively assessed variables

including psychosocial evaluation and QST to predict risk of chronic pain

after surgery, and allow development of a study enrichment tool to

investigate existing and novel perioperative preventive therapies

2016-2018

ReActiv8-B trial

Mainstay Medical Limited

Co-Investigator (PI: Christopher Gilligan)

An international, multi-center, prospective randomized sham-controlled IDE

trial at up to 40 clinical trial sites and for 128 randomized subjects to be

implanted with an innovative implantable neurostimulation system

(Reactiv8). Device is intended to reduce the pain and disability of Chronic

Lower Back Pain (CLBP) by helping to restore control to the muscles that

dynamically stabilize the lumbar spine

209a

7

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 27 of 52

2018-2019

Algovita Post-Market Clinical Study: Spinal Cord Stimulation to Treat

Chronic Pain

Nuvectra Medical

PI

Multi-center, prospective post market study following patients implanted

with Nuvectra’s Algovita spinal cord stimulator ($1800 per patient with 10

estimated patients)

2018-2019

Pilot Study to Examine the Feasibility of the DISCSS (Dynamic

Interferential Spinal Cord Stimulation System)

Meagan Medical Inc

PI

Multi-center, prospective pilot study following patients using a spinal cord

stimulator trial with a novel dynamic interferential system and measuring

outcomes compared to traditional stimulation ($4490 per patient with 10

estimated patients).

2018-2019

Algovita Ultra High Pulse Width Clinical Study: Spinal Cord Stimulation to

Treat Chronic Pain

Nuvectra Medical

PI

Multi-center, prospective study following patients implanted with Nuvectra’s

Algovita spinal cord stimulator utilizing ultra high pulse width settings

($1800 per patient with 10 estimated patients).

2019-2020

Clonidine Micropellet Clinical Study for Radiculopathy

Sollis Therapeutics, Inc.

PI

Prospective, multi-center, randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled

study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of clonidine micropellets for the

treatment of pain associated with lumbosacral radiculopathy in adults ($9,633

per patient with 20 estimated patients).

2019-2022

PROLONG Neuromodulation Study for Post Laminectomy Syndrome

Abbott

PI

prospective, multi-center, open-label, post-market study following patients

who have failed stimulation previously and are now using BurstDR

waveforms or Dorsal Root Ganglion stimulation with restored efficacy ($ per

patient with 10 estimated patients).

2021

RELIEF

Boston Scientific

210a

8

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 28 of 52

PI ($25,941)

The primary objective of this study is to compile characteristics of real-world

clinical outcomes for Boston Scientific commercially approved

neurostimulation systems for pain in routine clinical practice, when used

according to the applicable Directions for Use. The secondary objective of

this study is to evaluate the economic value and technical performance of

Boston Scientific commercially approved neurostimulation systems for pain

in routine clinical practice

Current

2020-

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double Blinded, Active Controlled, Multicenter

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of EXPAREL

admixed with Bupivacaine vs Bupivacaine only administered as Combined

Sciatic (in popliteal fossa) and Adductor Canal Nerve Block for Postsurgical

Analgesia in Subjects Undergoing Lower Extremity Surgeries

Co-Investigator (PI: Srdjan Nedeljkovic)

This study will evaluate the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine when given as

a Sciatic (in popliteal fossa) and Adductor Canal nerve block following foot

and ankle surgery compared to plain bupivacaine

2020-

SCOPE Superion Study for Neurogenic Claudication

Boston Scientific

PI ($40,159.00)

Multi-center, propective, observational, single-arm, post-approval study to

evaluate the Superion interspinous process spacer outcomes in patients with

lumbar spinal stenosis resulting in neurogenic claudication

2020-

SKOAP Sequenced strategy for improving outcomes in people with knee

osteoarthritis pain

Co-Investigator (PI: Christopher Gilligan)

There is an urgent public health need to reduce our reliance on opioids for

effective long-term pain management, particularly in knee osteoarthritis

(KOA). This effectiveness trial will compare recommended treatments to

reduce pain and functional limitations in KOA and identify clinical and

patient-level factors associated with treatment response. These results will

lead to improved patient selection for treatment and inform evidence-based

guidelines by offering well-tested, effective, non-opioid alternatives.

2020-

Dorsal spInal cord STImulatioN vs mediCal management for the Treatment

of low back pain (DISTINCT)

Abbott BioResearch

211a

9

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 29 of 52

Co-Investigator (PI: Christopher Gilligan)

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of BurstDRTM spinal

cord stimulation, compared with conventional medical management, in

improving pain and back pain-related physical function in patients suffering

with chronic, refractory axial low back pain, who have not had lumbar spine

surgery and for whom surgery is not an option.

2022-

From Nerve to Brain: Toward a Mechanistic Understanding of Spinal Cord

Stimulation in Human Subjects

NIH - HEAL; NCT05661903; RM1ActNS128741

Co-Investigator (PI: Brian Wainger)

This is a multicenter prospective study of patients who currently have stably

implanted spinal cord simulators. The fundamental hypothesis for this study

is that spinal cord stimulators modulate the excitability of primary afferent

neurons to reduce pain, and that these changes can be detected by

measurement of axonal excitability. This study will use robust, reproducible

techniques to define the peripheral, central, and systemic effects of spinal

cord stimulators.

2022-

A Phase 3, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study,

to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SB-01 for injection for the treatment of

lumbar degenerative disc disease

Spine BioPharma

PI ($35,180)

Confirm the safety and effectiveness of SB-01 For Injection in adult patients

with chronic low back pain and related disability due to Lumbar

Degenerative Disc Disease.

2022-

A Phase 3, Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Shamcontrolled Study on the Efficacy and Safety of STX-015 in the Treatment of

Pain Associated with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy

Sollis Therapeutics, Inc.

Co-Investigator (PI: Srdjan Nedeljkovic)

To compare the efficacy of STX-015 in treating pain at the location

associated with the worst lumbar and lumbosacral radiculopathy at Week 12

(3 months) after a single injection of STX-015 into the targeted lumbar or

lumbosacral epidural space, compared to that from a blinded, control group

of subjects who will undergo a sham injection designed to mimic the actual

epidural injection of STX-015.

2023-

Delivery for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)

Medronic Inc.

212a

10

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 30 of 52

Co-Investigator (PI: Aaron Waxman)

The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety profile of the

Medronic Model 10642 and Model 8201 Implantable Intravascular Catheter,

a component of the PAH Implantable Vasodilator Therapy (PIVoT) system.

Unfunded Current Projects

2019-

IRB pending Case Series Evaluating the Compliance and Efficacy of Smart

Pill-bottles

PI

Single-center, prospective cohort evaluating patient compliance of Bluetooth

enabled smart pill dispensers for opioid medication and efficacy of reducing

opioid misuse and abuse

2020-

IRB pending Utilizing a Cadaver-Training Simulator to Teach Interventional

Spine Procedures

PI

Single-center, analyzing an innovative approach to educating fellows and

residents on interventional spine procedures measuring accuracy, comfort,

radiation exposure, and time

2022-

Prospective Analysis of Health State Utility After Chronic Migraines by

Patients Who Experienced This Diagnosis

PI

The primary aim of this study is to quantify the health utility states of people

who experienced chronic migraines. Assessing patients’ perception of

chronic migraine pain will allow us to compare directly with layperson

assessment of chronic migraine pain.

2023-

Prospective Analysis of Health State Utility After Chronic Lower Back Pain

by Patients Who Experienced This Diagnosis

PI

The primary aim of this study is to quantify the health utility states of people

who experienced chronic low back pain. Assessing patients’ perception of

chronic low back pain will allow us to improve the understanding of the

significance of the diagnosis and provide a quantitative significance to better

inform the medical community of the value that should be assigned to

efficacious treatments

Report of Local Teaching and Training

Teaching of Students in Courses:

213a

11

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 31 of 52

2011

BUS 2107 Commercializing Science

Class

Clinical advisor to graduate students

Harvard Business School, Cambridge,

MA

1 hour / year

2011

ES227 Medical Device Design Class

graduate students

Harvard Graduate School of

Engineering, Cambridge, MA

1 hour / year

2011

Introduction to Anesthesia: What does a

career in anesthesia look like?

medical students

Harvard Medical School

1 hour / week

Formal Teaching of Residents, Clinical Fellows and Research Fellows (post-docs):

2010

Interpretation of an Arterial Blood Gas

Critical Care residents, fellows and staff

SICU Lecture Series, BWH Dept.

Anesthesia, Perioperative and Pain

Medicine

1 hour / year

2010

Malignant Hyperthermia.

Residents/fellows

Sunrise Lecture Series, BWH Dept.

Anesthesia, Perioperative and Pain

Medicine

1 hour / year

2011

Hypertension in Pregnancy,

OB anesthesia residents

OB Lecture Series, BWH Dept.

Anesthesia, Perioperative and Pain

Medicine

1 hour / week

2011-2012

High Yield Board Topics

Anesthesia residents

Sunrise Lecture Series, BWH Dept.

Anesthesia, Perioperative and Pain

Medicine

1 hour / year 30 minute lecture annually

2012

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

Anesthesia residents, fellows

Sunrise Lecture Series, BWH Dept.

Anesthesia, Perioperative and Pain

Medicine

1 hour / week

2012

Complications of Back Surgery

Anesthesia fellows

Fellow’s Curriculum Series, BWH

Dept. Anesthesia, Perioperative and

Pain Medicine

1 hour / week

214a

12

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 32 of 52

2012

Methadone

Anesthesia residents, fellows

Sunrise Lecture Series, BWH Dept.

Anesthesia, Perioperative and Pain

Medicine

1 hour / week

2012-2013

Acute Pain Management

medical students

College Day Lecture Series, Johns

Hopkins Hospital, Dept of Anesthesia

and Perioperative Medicine

1 hour / year

2012-2013

Cancer Pain

medical students

College Day Lecture Series, Johns

Hopkins Hospital, Dept of Anesthesia

and Perioperative Medicine

1 hour / year

2013

Minimally Invasive Lumbar

Decompression,

residents, fellows

Pain Management Lecture Series, BWH

Dept. Anesthesia, Perioperative and

Pain Medicine

1 hour / week

2013-

Advanced Pain Medicine

Department CA-2/3 Residents

BWH Dept. Anesthesia, Perioperative

and Pain Medicine

3 hours / year

2013-

Basics of Pain Medicine

Department CA-1 Residents

Residency Didactic Lecture Series,

BWH Dept. Anesthesia, Perioperative

and Pain Medicine

3 hours / year

2013-

Cancer Pain Medicine

Department CA-2/3 Residents (

Residency Didactic Lecture Series,

BWH Dept. Anesthesia, Perioperative

and Pain Medicine

3 hours / year

2015-

Interventional Pain Management Coding Faulkner Pain Management Center

and Billing,

Lecture Series, Brigham and Women’s

residents, fellows

Faulkner Hospital, Department of

Anesthesia

1 hour / year

Clinical Supervisory and Training Responsibilities:

215a

13

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 33 of 52

2012-2013

Supervision

Residents and CRNA's

Johns Hopkins Hospital, Department of

Anesthesiology

8 hours / week

2013-

Supervision

Residents, Fellows, Nurse Practitioners,

and Physician Assistants

BWH APPM, Division of Pain

Medicine

6 hours / week

2013-

Supervision

Residents and CRNA’s

BWH APPM, Department of

Anesthesiology

2 hours / week

Other Mentored Trainees and Faculty:

2012-2013

Liang Shen, MD / Instructor, Weill Cornell Medical College

Career stage: Resident.

Mentoring role: Clinical guidance and performance evaluation.

Accomplishments: multiple first authored scholarship; Fellowship in Critical

Care

2013-2014

Ehren Nelson, MD / Instructor, Brigham and Women’s Hospital

Career stage: Resident and Fellow.

Mentoring role: Clinical guidance, performance evaluation, and academic

mentoring.

Accomplishments: Multiple national and international invited lectures;

Fellowship in Pain Medicine

2014-2015

Isaac Tong, MD / Pain Medicine Attending, San Antonio

Career stage: Resident and fellow, Brigham and Women’s Hospital.

Mentoring role: Faculty mentor during Residency and Pain Fellowship with

guidance and performance evaluation

Established a strong reputation as a key opinion leader and expert in pain

medicine and practice development.

2014-2017

Jessica Hellums, MD / Pain Medicine Fellow, Brigham and Women’s

Hospital

Career stage: Resident.

Mentoring role: Faculty mentor during CA-1/2/3 year with guidance and

performance evaluation

Established a strong reputation as a key opinion leader and expert in pain

medicine and practice development.

216a

14

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 34 of 52

2015-2016

Jeffrey McLaren, MD / Pain Medicine Fellow, Virginia Mason

Career stage: Resident, Brigham and Women’s Hospital.

Mentoring Role: Faculty mentor during CA-3 year with guidance and

performance evaluation

Established a strong reputation as a key opinion leader and expert in pain

medicine.

2015-2016

Mona Patel, MD / Pain Medicine Attending, Irvine, California

Career stage: Fellow, Brigham and Women’s Hospital.

Mentoring role: Faculty mentor during Pain Fellowship with guidance and

performance evaluation

Established a strong reputation as a key opinion leader and expert in pain

medicine and academic publications.

2015-2018

Brandon Napstad, MD / Anesthesiology Resident, Brigham and Women’s

Hospital

Career stage: Resident.

Mentoring role: Faculty mentor during CA-1-3 year with guidance and

performance evaluation

Established a strong reputation as a clinical anesthesiologist.

2016-2017

Victor Wang, MD / Instructor, Brigham and Women’s Hospital

Career stage: Fellow.

Mentoring role: Faculty mentor during Pain Fellowship with guidance and

performance evaluation.

Accomplishments: Multiple first authored scholarship

2016-2019

Andrew Pisansky, MD / Anesthesiology Resident, Brigham and Women’s

Hospital

Career stage: Resident.

Mentoring role: Faculty mentor during CA-1-3 year with guidance and

performance evaluation

Completed a pain fellowship and is now director of acute pain at Vanderbilt

with significant academic productivity.

2016-2019

David Buric, MD / Anesthesiology Resident, Brigham and Women’s Hospital

Career stage: Resident.

Mentoring role: Faculty mentor during CA-1-3 year with guidance and

performance evaluation

Completed cardiac and ICU fellowships with significant academic

productivity.

217a

15

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 35 of 52

2017-2018

Fang Fang Xing, MD / Pain Management Fellow, Brigham and Women’s

Hospital

Career stage: Fellow.

Mentoring role: Faculty mentor during Pain Fellowship with guidance and

evaluation.

Accomplishments: multiple first authored scholarship

2017-2020

Shafiq Boyaji, MD / Anesthesiology Resident, Brigham and Women’s

Hospital

Career stage: Resident.

Mentoring role: Faculty mentor during CA-1-3 year with guidance and

performance evaluation

Established a strong reputation as a key opinion leader and expert in pain

medicine and practice development with academic productivity.

2018-2019

Michael Lubrano, MD / Pain Management Fellow, Brigham and Women’s

Hospital

Career Stage: Fellow.

Mentoring role: Faculty mentor during Pain Fellowship with guidance and

evaluation.

Accomplishments: multiple first authored scholarship

2019-2020

Bilal Dar, MD / Pain Management Fellow, Brigham and Women’s Hospital.

Career Stage: Fellow

Mentoring role: Faculty mentor during Pain Fellowship with guidance and

evaluation.

Accomplishments: case reports

2019-2022

Kunal Mandavawala, MD – Anesthesiology Resident, Brigham and Women’s

Hospital.

Career Stage: Resident.

Mentoring role: Faculty mentor during CA 1-3 year with guidance and

performance evaluation

Will be completing cardiac and ICU fellowships with significant academic

productivity.

2020-2023

Michael Fiore, MD, pharmD – Anesthesiology Resident, Brigham and

Women’s Hospital.

Career Stage: Resident.

Mentoring role: Faculty mentor during CA 1-3 year with guidance and

performance evaluation

218a

16

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 36 of 52

Will be applying for pain with significant research involving medical

education.

Formal Teaching of Peers (e.g., CME and other continuing education courses):

No presentations below were sponsored by 3rd parties/outside entities

2015

Chronic Venous Insufficiency, Comprehensive

Review of Pain Medicine, [Directed by Dr. Edgar

Ross. Recorded CME video lecture]

sponsored by Oakstone

single presentation

Boston

Local Invited Presentations:

No presentations below were sponsored by 3rd parties/outside entities

2014

Pain Treatment Modalities and Palliative Care for Cognitively Impaired

and Terminally Ill Patients / Invited Lecture

2nd Annual Pain Management Lecture, Brigham and Women’s

Hospital

2014

Spine Views for Interventional Pain Procedures / Invited Lecture

Massachusetts Society of Radiologic Technologists, Brigham and

Women’s Hospital

2016-

Pain Medicine Billing Primer / Invited Lecture

Pain Medicine Lecture Series, Brigham and Women's Hospital

2018

Post-operative Pain and the Chronic Pain Patient / Invited Lecture

PACU Lecture Series. Brigham and Women’s Faulkner Hospital

2022-2022

Peri-operative Pain Management & Chronic Opioid Therapy / Grand

Rounds

Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital, Department of

Anesthesiology

2023

Final Words of Wisdom / Invited Lecture

BWH Pain Fellow Lecture SEries

Report of Regional, National and International Invited Teaching and Presentations

Those presentations below sponsored by outside entities are so noted and the sponsor(s) is (are)

identified.

219a

17

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 37 of 52

Regional

2015

Advances in Chronic Pain Management / Grand Rounds

Tufts University, Anesthesiology, Boston, MA

2021

Opioid Management / Invited Speaker

New Hampshire Medical Society, Conway, NH

2023

Spine Interventions: MILD, Spacers, and Stimulation / Invited Lecture

Combined MGH, BWH, BI Ortho Spine Attending Lecture Series

National

2013

Perioperative Pain Management, Optimal Anesthesia Management / Invited

Lecture

Johns Hopkins Anesthesia Continuing Education, Baltimore, MD

2013

Pharmacology of Anesthetics / Invited Lecture

Johns Hopkins Regional Live Meeting Series, Boston

2013

Preoperative Patient Assessment / Invited Lecture

Johns Hopkins Regional Live Meeting Series, Boston

2015

Cutting Edge Chronic Pain / Grand Rounds

George Washington University, Anesthesiology, Washington, DC

2016

Innovation: Treatment and Prescribing Panelist and Moderator, Tennessee

Pain Opioids Problems Solutions Forum / Symposium

Nashville, TN

2017

Current Topics in Pain Medicine / Grand Rounds

Kaiser Permanente, Department of Anesthesiology, San Diego, CA

2017

Novel Therapies in Pain Medicine / Grand Rounds

Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Anesthesiology,

Charleston, SC

2018

On and Off Label Applications for Pain Control / Invited Lecture

NYC Neuromodulation Conference and NANS Summer Series, New York,

NY

220a

18

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 38 of 52

2019

Interpretation of Spinal Diagnostic Imaging Studies: Learning a Structured

Approach / Invited Speaker

American Society of Anesthesiology, Orlando, FL

2020

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Novel Therapies / Invited Speaker

Multi-institution COVID-19 Lecture Series, Sponsored by University of

Washington

2020

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation / Invited Speaker

American Society of Neuro Radiologists, Las Vegas, NV

2020

Waveform Innovation in Spinal Cord Stimulation / Invited Speaker

Multi-institution COVID-19 Lecture Series, Sponsored by University of

Washington

2021

Pain Medicine: Practice Management and Billing Compliance

University of Miami

2022

Pain Management and Opioid Stewardship

OhioHealth

2022

Spinal Cord Stimulation: New Devices and Advances / Invited Lecture

Brown University, Medical School, Department of Anesthesiology

2022-2022

Keynote: CDC Opioid Prescribing Guidelines Update – Thoughts, Impacts &

Where do we go from here / Keynote Lecture

Eastern Pain Association Annual Meeting

2022-2022

Pathophysiology of Pain - A 2022 Update / Invited Lecture

Harvard Medical School, Evaluating & Treating Pain Conference

Lecture and Panel

2022-2022

Neuromodulation: From Bench to Bedside / Grand Rounds

Cedar Sinai, Department of Anesthesiology, Department Grand Rounds

2022-2022

The Digital Transformation of Medicine / Invited Lecture

New York City, New York

2023

Neuromodulation Advances / Invited Lecture

Brown University, Medical School, Department of Anesthesiology

2023

Invasive Pain Management Techniques / Invited Lecture

Medical & Life Care Consulting's 2023 INJURY INSIGHT webinar series

This four-part webinar series is designed to educate and inform adjusters,

221a

19

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 39 of 52

employers, risk managers, and industry stakeholders of the rehabilitation and

recovery process of injuries, illnesses, diagnoses, and treatments, both

common and uncommon, within workers' compensation claims.

International

2017

Difficult Airway Management / Anesthesiology Grand Rounds

Kanombe Military Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda

2017

Nerve Blocks for Facial Surgery / Anesthesiology Grand Rounds

Santa Casa Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil

2019

Perioperative Pain Management and Alternatives to Opioids / Invited Speaker

Korean American Spine Society Annual Meeting, Vancouver, CA

2019

State of the Art in Interventional Pain Procedures / Invited Speaker

Korean American Spine Society Annual Meeting, Vancouver, CA

2023

Prospective Survey of Health Utility State of Chronic Migraine Patients to Assess

Quality - Adjusted Life-Years / Platform Presentation

European Society of Regional Anesthesiology, Paris, France

Report of Clinical Activities and Innovations

Past and Current Licensure and Certification:

2005-

American Heart Association, Basic and Advanced Cardiac Life Support

2008-

Permanent Licensee, State of Massachusetts

2012-2014

Permanent Licensee, State of Maryland

2012-

Diplomate, American Board of Anesthesiology

2012-

Diplomate, American Board of Anesthesiology Pain Medicine

Practice Activities:

2012-2013

General and regional

anesthesia

Johns Hopkins Hospital,

Baltimore, MD

40 hours / week

2013

Pain Medicine

Physician

Brigham and Women’s

Hospital, Boston, MA

30 hours / week

222a

20

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 40 of 52

2013-

General and regional

anesthesia

Clinical Innovations:

Cofounder of

multidisciplinary

spine center / BWF

(2014)

Brigham and Women’s

Hospital, Boston, MA

10 hours / week

As founding medical director of Brigham and Women’s Faulkner Hospital’s

Pain Management Center, a high priority was increased collaboration with

the other services in the hospital. After our initial collaboration with the

Graham Headache Center proved to be successful, we decided to build a

spine center with operative and non-operative services focused on

comprehensive spine care. We used a wing of the newly built Orthopedic

center at Faulkner to carve out 6 exam rooms and a multi-use work area to

build a center where Orthopedics or Neurosurgery was collocated with

Physiatry or Pain Medicine. Serving on the governance committee since the

inception, I have actively been involved with the creation of workflows,

marketing, and management of the spine center. The multi-disciplinary

collaboration with physical therapy, pain psychology, rheumatology,

neurology, and spine surgery has allowed a focus on developing non-opioid

strategies to managing patients suffering with pain.

Implemented

changes for practice

efficiency / BWH

Pain Ctr

(2017)

Because of the significant clinical and financial growth of the Brigham and

Women’s Faulkner Hospitals Pain Management Center, I was selected to be

the Medical Director of Brigham and Women’s main Pain Management

Center. In this position, I created several processes and work flow changes

to improve efficiency. First, I changed the schedule to split out procedures

and evaluations into separate sessions. Doing this provided each attending

physician dedicated geography and resources to see more patients in less

time while reducing wasted footsteps. Next, I worked with Epic to create

several shortcuts and orders so providers could quickly enter an order for a

procedure which would then automatically enter the work queue for

managed care services to obtain prior authorization. The new orders have

helped to minimize denials while ensuring the proper time and location are

allocated for the desired procedure. I also helped create the new order

system providers use to refer patients to our multiple locations of Pain

Medicine.

Creator of new

reporting for Pain

Management Center

/ BWH pain Ctr

(2017)

Also in my role as Medical Director of Brigham and Women’s Pain

Management Center, I created two new reports the administration and staff

use monthly. The first report is a gaps analysis to determine sessions where

we have inadequate provider coverage. The second report is a productivity

report that marries our billing database with the scheduling system to

provide the physicians aggregate productivity data that can then be drilled

down into individual days. The report is now used by attending physicians

223a

21

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 41 of 52

to track their productivity and by the finance division to cross verify their

reporting measures.

Introduction of

Radiofrequency

Identification to

measure time driven

activity based

costing /

(2018)

In collaboration with MIT and Harvard Business School I am coordinating

the implementation of radiofrequency identification (RFID) tags and readers

to more accurately and robustly calculate costs of a given activity using time

driven activity based costing (TDABC). The current models utilizing

TDABC in healthcare rely on manual recordings of each step in an activity.

Utilizing RFID would minimize the measurement bias and allow for a larger

sample size.

Report of Teaching and Education Innovations

Co-founder for the

I co-created a lecture series for the Pain Medicine fellows. In the lecture

Faulkner Lecture

series, we invite lecturers from other specialties including orthopedics,

Series

radiology, psychiatry, and law to discuss practical concepts in Pain

(2014)

Management to prepare them for their early careers. The feedback from the

fellows is superb and an integral part of their education.

Creator and manager

of Faulkner Hospital

Pain rotation

(2016)

Since founding the Brigham and Women’s Faulkner Hospital’s Pain

Management Center in 2013, we have been asked to host rotation for interns,

residents, and fellows. Each year we have a growing number of residents

requesting the rotation for the CA-3’s pain medicine elective – even for

residents not specializing in Pain Medicine. Additionally, we now host

Neurology Headache fellows, Regional Anesthesia fellows, and categorical

anesthesia interns. I coordinate and evaluate all rotating trainees through the

Pain Center.

Introduction of pain

simulation

(2018-)

Simulation in anesthesiology is now a standard for resident education,

however, within Pain Medicine simulation has not gained traction. I worked

with a company called Biotras to bring a spine simulator with cadaveric

bone and ballistic gel to the Pain Management Center at Brigham and

Women’s Hospital. We organized two sessions for the 2018-2019 fellow

class to practice obtaining the correct views and directing the needle for four

of our most common procedures. The feedback was so overwhelmingly

positive from the fellows that we curated an entire curriculum based on

simulation. We have published on our findings demonstrating improvements

in fellow comfort, accuracy, radiation exposure, and time for each

procedure. Every year we have incrementally added new ad-hoc session in

the second half of each fellowship year.

224a

22

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 42 of 52

Report of Education of Patients and Service to the Community

No presentations below were sponsored by 3rd parties/outside entities

Activities

1999

Medical Mission

Medical mission to Guatemala with Sending Out Servants

2000-2002

Big Brothers Big Sisters

Over 500 hours spent as a mentor in Austin, TX

2000-2002

Habitat for Humanity

Habitat for Humanity via Texas Blazers

2010

Global Smile Foundation

Medical Mission to Cote D’Ivoire, Global Smile Foundation (Anesthesiologist)

2011

Global Smile Foundation

Medical Mission, Ecuador with the Global Smile Foundation (Anesthesiologist)

2012, 2015

Global Smile Foundation

Medical Mission, Guatemala with the Global Smile Foundation

(Anesthesiologist)

2017

Face the Future Foundation

Medical Mission, Rwanda with Face the Future (Anesthesiologist)

2017

Global Smile Foundation

Medical Mission, Brazil with Global Smile Foundation (Anesthesiologist)

2018, 2019

Face the Future Foundation

Medical Mission, Rwanda with Face the Future Foundation (Anesthesiologist)

Educational Material for Patients and the Lay Community:

Patient educational material

2015

Managing with Low

Back

BWF, Community Lecture

Series

2016

Novel Techniques for

Treating Low Back

Pain

BWF, Community Lecture

Series

225a

23

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 43 of 52

Recognition:

2010

Featured in Brigham and Women’s

Hospital Bulletin

12/13/2010 article: Driving Clinical

Innovations at BWH

2011

Featured in the Harvard Gazette

(September 20, 2011)

Surgical Precision at SEAS

9/20/2011 article: Innovation and Medical

Device Design

2016

Featured in Tennessean (April 5,

2016)

4/5/2016 article: Health care leaders urge

action on opioid abuse

2016

Highlighted in educational marketing

video for Brigham and Women’s

Hospital

5/6/2016 video: Managing Back Pain

2016

Highlighted in marketing video for

Faulkner Hospital Pain Management

Center

5/12/2016 video: Pain Management

Center at BWFH

Report of Scholarship

ORCID: 0000-0001-6960-9621

Peer-Reviewed Scholarship in print or other media:

Research Investigations

1.

Brattain LJ, Floryan C, Hauser OP, Nguyen M, Yong RJ, Kesner SB, Corn SB, Walsh

CJ. Simple and effective ultrasound needle guidance system. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng

Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:8090-8093. PMID: 22256219,

https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091995

2.

Yong RJ, Nelson ER, Urman RD, Kaye AD. A primer for billing in interventional pain

management. J Med Pract Manage. 2015;30(6 Spec No):51-54. PMID: 26062319

3.

Imran TF, Malapero R, Qavi AH, Hasan Z, de la Torre B, Patel YR, Yong RJ, Djousse

L, Gaziano JM, Gerhard-Herman MD. Efficacy of spinal cord stimulation as an adjunct

therapy for chronic refractory angina pectoris. Int J Cardiol. 2017 Jan 15;227:535-542.

PMID: 27836302, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.10.105

4.

Kim AJ, Yong RJ, Urman RD. The Role of Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks in

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathways for Open and Laparoscopic Colorectal

Surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Sep;27(9):909-914. PMID: 28742435,

https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2017.0337

226a

24

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 44 of 52

5.

Pak DJ, Yong RJ, Kaye AD, Urman RD. Chronification of Pain: Mechanisms, Current

Understanding, and Clinical Implications. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018 Feb 5;22(2):9.

PMID: 29404791, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-018-0666-8

6.

Xing F, Yong RJ, Kaye AD, Urman RD. Intrathecal Drug Delivery and Spinal Cord

Stimulation for the Treatment of Cancer Pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018 Feb

5;22(2):11. PMID: 29404792, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-018-0662-z

7.

Aman, M.M., Jason Yong, R., Kaye, A.D.et al.Evidence-Based Non-Pharmacological

Therapies for Fibromyalgia.Curr Pain Headache Rep22, 33 (2018).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-018-0688-2

8.

Simopoulos T, Yong RJ, Gill JS. Treatment of Chronic Refractory Neuropathic Pelvic

Pain with High-Frequency 10-kilohertz Spinal Cord Stimulation. Pain Pract. 2018

Jul;18(6):805-809. PMID: 29106051, https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12656

9.

Wang VC, Preston MA, Kibel AS, Xu X, Gosnell J, Yong RJ, Urman RD. A

Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate

Intravenous Acetaminophen Versus Placebo in Patients Undergoing Robotic-Assisted

Laparoscopic Prostatectomy. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2018;32(2-3):82-89.

PMID: 30645153, https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2018.1513436

10.

Novak CJ, Khimani N, Kaye AD, Jason Yong R, Urman RD. Current Therapeutic

Interventions in Lower Extremity Venous Insufficiency: a Comprehensive Review. Curr

Pain Headache Rep. 2019 Mar 4;23(3):16. doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0759-z. PMID:

30830460

11.

Valimahomed AK, Haffey PR, Urman RD, Kaye AD, Yong RJ. Regenerative

Techniques for Neuraxial Back Pain: a Systematic Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep.

2019 Mar 11;23(3):20. PMID: 30854599, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-019-0758-0

12.

Morales A, Yong RJ, Kaye AD, Urman RD. Spinal Cord Stimulation: Comparing

Traditional Low-frequency Tonic Waveforms to Novel High Frequency and Burst

Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep.

2019 Mar 14;23(4):25. PMID: 30868285, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-019-0763-3

13.

Atkinson TJ, Pisansky AJB, Miller KL, Yong RJ. Common elements in opioid use

disorder guidelines for buprenorphine prescribing. Am J Manag Care. 2019 Mar

1;25(3):e88-e97. PMID: 30875177

14.

Boyaji S, Merkow J, Elman RNM, Kaye AD, Yong RJ, Urman RD. The Role of

Cannabidiol (CBD) in Chronic Pain Management: An Assessment of Current Evidence.

227a

25

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 45 of 52

Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020 Jan 24;24(2):4. PMID: 31980957,

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-020-0835-4

15.

Coppes OJM, Yong RJ, Kaye AD, Urman RD. Patient and Surgery-Related Predictors

of Acute Postoperative Pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020 Feb 18;24(4):12. PMID:

32072315, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-020-0844-3

16.

Costelloe C, Burns S, Yong RJ, Kaye AD, Urman RD. An Analysis of Predictors of

Persistent Postoperative Pain in Spine Surgery. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020 Feb

18;24(4):11. PMID: 32072357, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-020-0842-5

17.

Merkow J, Varhabhatla N, Manchikanti L, Kaye AD, Urman RD, Yong RJ. Minimally

Invasive Lumbar Decompression and Interspinous Process Device for the Management

of Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: a Literature Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep.

2020 Feb 18;24(4):13. PMID: 32072362, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-020-0845-2

18.

Blevins Peratikos M, Weeks HL, Pisansky AJB, Yong RJ, Stringer EA. Effect of

Preoperative Opioid Use on Adverse Outcomes, Medical Spending, and Persistent

Opioid Use Following Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty in the United States: A Large

Retrospective Cohort Study of Administrative Claims Data. Pain Med. 2020 Mar

1;21(3):521-531. PMID: 31120529, PMCID: PMC7060398,

https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz083

19.

Li L, Yong RJ, Kaye AD, Urman RD. Perioperative Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS)

for Anesthesiologists: an Overview. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020 Mar 21;24(5):20.

PMID: 32200432, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-020-0847-0

20.

Morales ME, Yong RJ. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Treatment of Chronic Pain.

Pain Med. 2021 Feb 4;22(1):75-90. PMID: 33367911,

https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaa427

Cited 63 time as of 5/2023

21.

Henson JV, Varhabhatla NC, Bebic Z, Kaye AD, Yong RJ, Urman RD, Merkow JS.

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic

Review. Pain Ther. 2021 Dec;10(2):895-908. PMID: 34244979, PMCID: PMC8586096,

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00282-9

22.

Yong RJ, Mullins PM, Bhattacharyya N. Prevalence of chronic pain among adults in the

United States. Pain. 2022 Feb 1;163(2):e328-e332. PMID: 33990113,

https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002291

Cited 162 times as of 5/2023

228a

26

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 46 of 52

23.

Mullins, Peter M.; Yong, Robert J.; Bhattacharyya, Neil.Impact of demographic factors

on chronic pain among adults in the United States. PAIN Reports 7(4):p e1009,

July/August 2022. | DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001009

24.

Sarno D, Yong RJ, Fields KG, Lim SM, Gilligan CJ, Khan L, Nelson, E. "A Novel

Interventional Pain Simulation-Based Education Curriculum: Implementation to

Enhance Procedural Training" Interventional Pain Medicine Volume 1, Issue 4, Dec

2022

25.

Mullins PM, Yong RJ, Bhattacharyya N. Associations between chronic pain, anxiety,

and depression among adults in the United States. Pain Pract. 2023 Mar 7. doi:

10.1111/papr.13220. PMID: 36881021.

26.

Gilligan C, Burnside D, Grant L, Yong RJ, Mullins PM, Schwab F, Mekhail N.

ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs. Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized

Controlled Trial for the Treatment of Intractable Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain

(RESTORE Trial Protocol). Pain Ther. 2023 Apr;12(2):607-620. PMID: 36787013,

PMCID: PMC10036695, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-023-00475-4

27.

"Fluoroscopic MBBs and RFA for Facet-Mediated Low Back Pain" New England

Journal of Medicine In Press.

Other peer-reviewed scholarship

1.

Rohan Jotwani, Michael Fiore, Robert Jason Yong, David Hao;

Virtual reality for procedural education: Lumbar medial branch radiofrequency

neurotomy,

Interventional Pain Medicine,

Volume 1, Issue 1,

2022,

100088,

ISSN 2772-5944,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100088.

(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594422000796)

Non-peer reviewed scholarship in print or other media:

Reviews, chapters, and editorials

1. Yong RJ, Nedeljkovic S. Assessment of pain: Patient evaluation. In: Pocket Pain

Medicine, Urman RD, Vadivelu N (eds), Philadelphia: Lippincott

229a

27

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 47 of 52

2.

Tong I,Yong RJ. Pain Emergencies: Averting catastrophe through diagnosis and

treatment. In: Fundamentals of Pain Care. Oxford University Press, 2015

3.

Smith J, Yong RJ, Nedeljkovic S. “Minimally Invasive Treatments for Spinal Stenosis:

Percutaneous Lumbar Decompression.” Surgical Pain Management. Oxford University

Press, 2016

4.

Yazdi C, Yong RJ, Nguyen, M. “Endovenous Ablation.” Surgical Pain Management.

Oxford University Press, 2016

5.

Lockhart B, Yong RJ. Pharmacology of Pain Transmission and Modulation. In: Pain

Medicine: An Essential Review, RJ Yong, Nguyen M, Nelson E, Urman RD (eds), 1st

Ed. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2017; p.147-148.

6.

Patel M, Yong RJ. Corticosteroids. In: Pain Medicine: An Essential Review, RJ Yong,

Nguyen M, Nelson E, Urman RD (eds), 1st Ed. Switzerland: Springer International

Publishing, 2017; p.181-184

7.

Tong I, Yong RJ. “Sacroiliac Joint Pain.L5 Dorsal Ramus and S1-S3 Lateral Branch

Radiofrequency Ablation. In: Pain Medicine: An Essential Review, RJ Yong, Nguyen

M, Nelson E, Urman RD (eds), 1st Ed. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing,

2017; p.245-248

8.

Tong YCI, Yong RJ. Cervical Facet Injections/Medial Branch Block. In: Pain

Medicine: An Essential Review, RJ Yong, Nguyen M, Nelson E, Urman RD (eds), 1st

Ed. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2017; p.227-230

9.

Tong YCI, Yong RJ. Lumbar Medial Branch Radiofrequency Lesioning. In: Pain

Medicine: An Essential Review, RJ Yong, Nguyen M, Nelson E, Urman RD (eds), 1st

Ed. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2017; p.237-240

10.

Tong YCI, Yong RJ. Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection. In: Pain

Medicine: An Essential Review, RJ Yong, Nguyen M, Nelson E, Urman RD (eds), 1st

Ed. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2017; p.223-226

11.

Tong YCI, Yong RJ. Sacroiliac Joint Injection. In: Pain Medicine: An Essential Review,

RJ Yong, Nguyen M, Nelson E, Urman RD (eds), 1st Ed. Switzerland: Springer

International Publishing, 2017; p.241-244

12.

Yong RJ, Nelson E. “Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection: Cervical and Lumbar. In:

Pain Medicine: An Essential Review, RJ Yong, Nguyen M, Nelson E, Urman RD (eds),

1st Ed. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2017; p.219-222

230a

28

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 48 of 52

13.

Yong RJ. Issa M. Thoracic facet pain/medial branch blocks.. In: Pain Medicine: An

Essential Review, RJ Yong, Nguyen M, Nelson E, Urman RD (eds), 1st Ed. Switzerland:

Springer International Publishing, 2017; p.231-232

14.

Yong RJ. Issa M. Tricyclic antidepressants. In: Pain Medicine: An Essential Review, RJ

Yong, Nguyen M, Nelson E, Urman RD (eds), 1st Ed. Switzerland: Springer

International Publishing, 2017; p.165-166

15.

Saba R, Yong RJ, Gilligan C, Rathmell J. Emergencies in the Pain Clinic. In: Bonica’s

Management of Pain, Ballantyne JC, Fishman SM, Rathmell JP (eds), 5th Ed.

Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2018

16.

Tong YC, Yong RJ, Hogans BB, Booker SQ, Herr KA. Pain in Older Patients. Pain

Care Essentials. Oxford University Press. 11/01/2019; DOI:

10.1093/med/9780199768912.003.0020

17.

Lubrano M, Costelloe C, Yong RJ. Local Anesthetics and Scalp Blocks. In: Hair

Transplant Surgery and Platelet Rich Plasma: Evidence-based Essentials, Lee LN (ed),

1st Ed. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2020, chap 8

18.

Tong I, Yong RJ, Hogans BB. Pain Emergencies and Life-threatening Complications of

Pain Treatments. In: Pain Care Essentials, 1st Ed. Oxford University Press, 2020, chap

13

19.

Lubrano, M.C., Costelloe, C.C., Yong, R.J. (2020). Local Anesthesia and Scalp Blocks.

In: Lee, L.N. (eds) Hair Transplant Surgery and Platelet Rich Plasma. Springer, Cham.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54648-9_8

20.

Boyaji, S., Gilligan, C.J., Hirsch, J.A., Yong, R.J. (2020). Evidentiary Basis of

Percutaneous Discectomy. In: Manfrè, L., Van Goethem, J. (eds) The Disc and

Degenerative Disc Disease. New Procedures in Spinal Interventional Neuroradiology.

Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03715-4_8

21.

Brook, A.L., Boyaji, S., Gilligan, C.J., Hirsch, J.A., Yong, R.J. (2020). Epidural Steroid

Injections: Are They Still Useful?. In: Manfrè, L., Van Goethem, J. (eds) The Disc and

Degenerative Disc Disease. New Procedures in Spinal Interventional Neuroradiology.

Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03715-4_7

22.

He C, Yong RJ. Chronic Postsurgical Pain. Interventional Management of Chronic

Visceral Pain Syndromes, Pak DJ, Yong RJ, Shah KB (eds), Elsevier, 2021.

23.

Mehta AD, Yong RJ. Chronic Pancreatitis. Interventional Management of Chronic

Visceral Pain Syndromes, Pak DJ, Yong RJ, Shah KB (eds), Elsevier, 2021.

231a

29

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 49 of 52

24.

Zerriny S, Yong RJ. Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia. Interventional Management of

Chronic Visceral Pain Syndromes, Pak DJ, Yong RJ, Shah KB (eds), Elsevier, 2021.

Books/textbooks for the medical or scientific community

1. RJ Yong, Nguyen M, Nelson E, Urman RD. Pain Medicine: An Essential Review, 1st

Ed. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2017

2.

Pak D, Yong J, Shah K. Interventional management of chronic visceral pain syndromes.

1st edition, Missouri: Elsevier, 2021

Professional educational materials or reports, in print or other media:

1.

Yong R. Brigham and Women’s Anesthesia Residency Wiki. BWHAnesthesia.org,

2011

2.

Yong R. Brigham and Women’s Pain Fellow’s Wiki. BWHAnesthesia.org, 2011

3.

Yong, RJ www.TheAnswerPage.Com, A web-based daily educational resource for

medical professionals. A web-based daily educational resource for medical

professionals. Eleventh Annual Medical Education Day, Harvard Medical School,

Boston, MA, 2012

4.

Yong, RJ. TheAnswerPage.com. Pain, Palliative Care, Opioid Prescribing and Risk

Management: The Answer Page, Inc; 2012

5.

Yong RJ. Cancer Pain: in Pain, Palliative Care, Opioid Prescribing & Risk

Management: The Answer Page, Inc. 2015.

6.

Yong RJ. Cannabidiol Therapy in Cancer Pain and Management: Florida Physicians

Low -THC Cannabis Course: Florida Medical Association, Inc 2015

Abstracts, Poster Presentations, and Exhibits Presented at Professional Meetings:

1.

Yong RJ, Sarno D, Velez M. Resolution of Chronic Debilitating Headaches and Lumbar

Radicular Pain Following Spinal Cord Stimulation and Interspinous Process

Decompression: A Case Report. North American Neuromodulation Society, 2020.

2.

Fiore M, Galanti G, Park B, Lim S, Yong RJ, Gilligan C, Nelson E. Virtual Reality

Augmentation to a Pain Medicine Simulation Curriculum. American Academy of Pain

Medicine, 2021.

232a

30

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 50 of 52

3.

Mukherjee V, Yong RJ, Janardhanan D, Nelson ER, Zhao E, Gilligan CJ. Interventional

Management of Thoracic Pain Secondary to Malignant Pleural Effusion: A Case Report.

American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2021 Annual Assembly –

Pain and Spine Medicine. Annual Meeting; Nashville, TN

4.

Vu K, Pappy A, Berlin E, Yang A, Sarno D, Nelson E, Yong RJ. Comprehensive

Simulation Sessions for Interventional Spine Procedure: Preliminary Prospective

Results. Spine Intervention Society Annual Meeting, 2022. Poster Session

5.

Burns S, Majdak P, Yong RJ, Barreveld A. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation For

Patients with Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Retrospective Case Series. American Academy of

Pain Medicine Annual Meeting, 2023.

6.

Mullins P, Regenhardt S, Yong RJ. Acute Unscheduled Care Use Among Adults with

Chronic Pain: Results from the National Health Interview Survey. American Academy

of Pain Medicine Annual Meeting, 2023.

7.

Eckley MJ, Vu K, Yih ET, Yong RJ, Nelson ER, Pappy AL, Scott B, Hunter T, Gureck

A, Reilly AC, Burns SL, Sarno DL. (poster) Simulation-based education: a novel

grading rubric to assess performance of interventional pain procedures. AAPM Annual

Meeting, Fort Lauderdale, FL, March 2023.

8.

Mallett B, Ogletree S, Yong RJ. A Stim Without a Rose: Neurologic Recovery postSCS Explant. ASIPP Annual Conference, 2023. Poster Session.

9.

Gureck A, Vu K, Eckley MJ, Hunter T, Yih ET, Yong RJ, Nelson ER, Pappy AL, Scott

B, Reilly AC, Burns SL, Lee KW, Sarno DL. Simulation-based education to improve

procedural skills in spinal cord stimulation and dorsal root ganglion stimulation. Poster

presentation at the 2023 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain

MedicineMeeting in New Orleans, LA.

* Co-author, ** Mentee

Narrative Report

As an academic anesthesiologist specializing in pain medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, my

efforts are focused on developing clinical expertise, innovating pain medicine through novel implantable

devices and opioid management strategies, and educating fellows and residents. My major supporting

activity involves administrative and institutional service with leadership roles and committee service.

Approximately half of my time is devoted to direct patient care within pain medicine including time

spent evaluating patients in clinic, performing office-based procedures, and surgically implanting

devices to help manage pain. I spend twenty percent of my time as an anesthesiologist supervising

233a

31

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 51 of 52

residents and nurse anesthetists with a focus on regional anesthesia and acute post-operative pain

management. The remainder of my time is divided among administrative duties including institutional

committee service and serving as the Associate Chief of Pain Medicine and Medical Director of the Pain

Management Center.

Clinically, I have developed expertise in surgically implantable technologies for the treatment of chronic

pain and opioid management strategies. Since fellowship, I have been fascinated by neuromodulation

using spinal cord and peripheral stimulators to modulate pain signals. Using this passion, I have taught

fellows and residents extensively on the technology, and introduced the Nevro high frequency stimulator

to Brigham and Women’s Hospital becoming the first implanting physician in New England. Since then

I have continued as the major pioneering physician for other minimally invasive procedures in New

England, such as Vertiflex Superion spacer implantation, Relievant Intracept, Saluda neuromodulation,

Mainstay Reactiv8, Vertos MILD. I have tried to maintain an academic focus with new technology, and I

am currently the Principal Investigator in several prospective case-series examining the efficacy of novel

neuromodulation technologies. With my focus on neuromodulation, I have been fortunate enough to

become the top implanter of spinal cord stimulators in the Northeast.

I am continuing to develop my career in research and have several active funded clinical studies

involving neuromodulation and novel therapeutics. The unfunded project involve evaluating the health

utility of different pain states, medical education utilization a novel pain simulator, and analyzing

epidemiology of pain. In response to my personal struggles and those of fellows starting their careers, I

conceptualized and was first editor for Pain Medicine: An Essential Review which focuses on relevant

clinical pearls. I have published on several different topics within pain medicine and have a current Hindex of 16 with a first authored paper titled Prevalence of chronic pain among adults in the United

States cited over 300 times since publication in 2022. On a national level, I have been invited to give 5

grand rounds and was invited to serve on the American Board of Anesthesiology MOCA Minute for Pain

Medicine question writing committee. Internationally, I participate in 1-2 medical missions per year

providing anesthesia and have been invited to give multiple international presentations.

As the founding medical director of the Pain Management Center at Brigham and Women’s Faulkner

Hospital, I helped grow the pain medicine services at the hospital focusing on the integration of high

quality pain management to all areas of the hospital. Our volume tripled to over 400 pain patients per

month in the span of 3 years. Due in part to that success, in 2017, I was selected as the Medical Director

of the Pain Management Center at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. In this role, I am focused on

operational efficiency and financial viability. With the early changes I helped manage and develop, our

productivity has increased with an improvement in patient satisfaction. The rapid turnaround then led to

the appointment as Associate Chief of the Division of Pain Medicine. I was also elected to serve on the

Faculty Board in the Department of Anesthesiology. I serve as an active member on the Faculty

Recruitment Committee and the Anesthesiology Social Committee.

In my current role and as the previous Associate Program Director for the Pain Management Center at

Brigham and Women’s Hospital, I am involved with recruitment, curriculum development, and overall

management of the 10 fellows per year. My involvement in this role extends to committee service on a

hospital and national level with the American Board of Anesthesiology. As a product of our own

234a

32

Case 2:23-cv-00656-RAH Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 52 of 52

residency and fellowship, I am appreciative of the extensive curriculum and mentorship by the world

renown experts at our institution. I have strived to reciprocate using innovative teaching methods such as

This text is long and has been trimmed here. Open the source document for the complete record.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kenneth Eugene Smith, Petitioner v. John Q. Hamm, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al. | Frix