Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Davenell L. Ash, Petitioner v. Minnesota, et al.

Supreme Court briefOct 13, 2021

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

— PETITIONER

(Your Name)

t&UL

atf /QOA'ti&i

— RESPONDENT(S)

ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO

.•

CjLM

U< 5«

C/l

(NAME OF COURT THAT LAST RULED ON MERITS OF YOUR CASE)

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

'(XXMs^xXSj

(Your Name)

itlnTi^ due

(Address)

t tot mm

(City, State, Zip Code)

•SrsS’

(Phone Number)

i <500*3*

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED

Question One

Did the United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit deny Ms. Ash of her 14ih

amendment right of due process when she/he has a conflict of interest with knowledge

of the severity of the crime in progress (see 18 U.S.C.242) Does the eleventh

amendment apply when officer of the court have violated 28 U.S.C 455 and the court

has refused to provide any declaratory relief when the courts have full knowledge of pro

se Ash's name being placed on the terrorist watchlist ( see 31.U.S.C 3729),

non-consensual research(seel6CFR1028.116) human trafficking (seel8U.S.C.1581)

harassment/gangstalking/retaliation efforts with intentions to kill, maim, intimidate and

silence the whistleblowing efforts attempted by Ms. Ash

Answer

Yes

Question Two

Did the United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit err in not granting Ms. Ash a

jury's prudential exception. (See U.S.C 1291, 1292) in order to avoid having to consider

the following which would require an alternative set of congressional hearings to address

the illegal placement on a terrorist watchlist (see 18 U.S.C 1001) with sole intention to

force non-consensual research of central intelligence programs (see 16 CFR 1028.116)

while utilizing military grade weaponry, toxins, torture techniques, human trafficking,

gangstalking, targeted kill training in partnership with united states military, intelligence

agencies, law enforcement, hospitals and civilian contract perpetrators whom are paid

for the harassment services.

Answer

Yes

Question Three

Did the United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit purposely dismiss responsibility

for the State of Minnesota for the implementation, facilitation, publication, perpetuation

of a central intelligence research experiment in hopes that Ms. Ash would not survive.

Answer

Yes

Question 4

Did the united States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit Court allow the State of Minnesota

To continue to violate the fair housing act (See Alexandria v Fairfax, 95 U.S. 774(1878))

by interfering with all housing efforts via phone and computer hacking (See stat

609.87-93), for both home and business, to then redirect Ms. Ash to extremely unsafe

living and operating environments to then facilitate the same electromagnetic torture,

audio and video harassment and gangstalking protocol.

Answer

Yes

Question 5

Is pro se Ash’s forced participation of electromagnetic torture and gangstalking

implemented to force submission to illegal research and psychological torture being

preformed to benefit the facilitators profit from the dark web. While in violation of the

fair housing act and the 4th Amendment which states, ”a person has a right to be safe in

their home or business.” These illegal programs are used to silence

WHISTLEBLOWERS and others our government sees as a threat.

Yes

Question 6

Did the United States Court of Appeals err in denial allowing the State of Minnesota to

continue to participate in the direct violation of pro se Ash’s civil rights (see 18 U.S.C

242) by interference and harassment at pro se Ash’s place of business, her car and her

home residence with weapons of electromagnetic tortue, illegal audio, video harassment

and electronic hacking of both phone and computer while utilizing the same participants

from partnering participating states while in violation of The VAWA Act to include WI,

NC, ND, CO, IA, MS, MO and IL to further perpetuate retaliation and inhumane

harassment/gangstalking while publicizing and recruiting civilian participation.

Yes

List of Parties

Duluth Police Force

Hibbing Police Force

Rich lee of Lee’s Investment Hibbing, Mn

Lee Ann Garbano

Troy A Loeb

Related Cases

Davenell L Ash

V. State of Minnesota

Case # 21-cv-l 143

Davenell L Ash & Unique Beauty & Hair Supply LLC

City od Duluth

Case# 17-cv-1461

Ash

v. '

Pulaski City State Patrol

Case # 3;21-cv-00781-dwd

Davenell L Ash

Oxford, MS Police Dept

Et al Desoto County State Patrol

Davenell L Ash

State of Wisconsin Case # 21 -cv-317-jdp

Table of Contents

Opinions Below

Jurisdiction

Constitutional and Statutory Provisions Involved.

Statement of the Case

Reasons for Granting the Writ

Conclusion

Index to Appendices

Appendix A

Davenell L Ash & Unique Beauty & Hair Supply

LLC

City of Duluth

Appendix B

United States District Court

District of Minnesota

Appendix C

Case # 17-cv-1461

Case #21-cv-1143

United States Court of Appeal Eighth Circuit

Petitioner’s Petition Case # 21-2232

Appendix D

Car Receipts

Appendix E

False Case Filed Against Pro Se Ash

Appendix F

Apartment Lease

Appendix G

Addresses of Occurrences

Appendix H

Police Report of Stalker Attack on Highway

Photos

Appendix I

Appendix J

Appendix K

False case filed against Pro Se Ash Case # 2021CM000291

Superior, WI case sealed to protect the informant.

District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin

Case # 21 -cv-317-j dp

Table of Authorities Cited

Cases

Kelsey Vs. United States

Jeffrey Alan Kantor Vs. Eric J Holder

case #3:18-cv-1009-j-32mcr 12-14-2018

case# l;13-cv-01493-cmh-tcb 12-04-2013

Kieth Labella Vs. FBI, US Dept of Justice case# 1 lcv00023(NGG)(LB)

Stan J Caterbone Vs. USA

case# 18-10134

District of Columbia Vs. Heller

Case No 07-290 478

F 370 affirmed

02-09-2012

10-05-2018

Terry u Ohio [392 U.S. 1,88 S.Ct. 1968, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968

United States Vs. Cress

243 U.S. 316

1917

Erickson v. Pardus. 551 U.S. 89 (2007)

Powell Vs Alabamaln Powell Vs. Alabama

1932

Table of Authorities Cited

Statutes and Rules

1.) CIVIL RIGHTS §1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following:

"The underlying purpose of the scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit

victims of constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution

of serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for

purpose of deterring violations and to strike a balance between protection of individual

rights from state infringement and protection from state and local government from

federal interference", 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 241, 242; U.S.C.A. - Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend.

13, 14, 5, 15, § 2: 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule

28, U.S.C.A. In Ascolese v. Southeastern Turnpike Authority, C 925 F. supp. 351, the

case supports the notion that "One of the principal purposes of § 1983 was to give

remedy to parties Davenell L Ash, Pro Se of Constitutional Rights, ileges, and

immunities by Officia buse of his or her position, that is to provide remedy against

individual officials who violate Constitutional Rights U.S.C.A. § 1983. 4.

2.) CIVIL CONSPIRACY

Rico §263 42 § 1985 (2) Persons Involved In Litigation To Be Free From Conspiracy In

the case of United States v. Hoick, 389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines

single or multiple conspiracies by the following: "Governments, without committing

variance between single conspiracy charges in an indictment and it's proof at trial may

establish existence at continuing core conspiracy which attracts different members at

different times and which involves different subgroups committing acts in furtherance of

an overall plan". Pro Se Ash continues to be harassed despite resistance to all civil

unrest.

3.) §1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: "The underlying

purpose of the scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of

constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of serious

constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for purpose of

deterring violations , and to strike a balance een protection of individual rights from

state infringement and protection from state and local government from federal

interference", 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 241,242; U.S.C.A. - Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14,

5, 15, §2:42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28,

U.S.C.A. .

4.) ANIT-TRUST The Following violations constitute a legitimate Anti-Trust violation

under Title 15 of the Federal Statutes. In private Anti-Trust actions, Plaintiff, in addition

to proving violations and an injury, must also show that a violation and an injury must

also prove that the violation was direct and material to the cause of injury suffered;

however, the Plaintiffs burden in causations issues is not as heavy as the Plaintiff only

needs to show a casual relation with reasonable probability to a fair degree of certainty

(Anderson Foreign Motors, Inc. v. New England Toyota Distributors, Inc., D.C. Mass

1979, 475. Supp.).

5.) RICO • The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly

referred to as RICO) is a United States federal law which provides for extended penalties

for criminal acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization. RICO was

enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, Pub. L. No.

91 -452, 84 Stat. 922 (Oct. 15, 1970). RICO is codified as Chapter 96 of Title 18 of the

United States Code, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 through 18 U.S.C. § 1968. • It has been speculated

that the name and acronym were selected in a sly reference to the movie Little Caesar,

which featured a notorious gangster named "Rico." The original drafter of the bill, G.

Robert Blakey, has refused to confirm or deny this.[l] Summary Under RICO, a person

or group who commits any two of 35 crimes-27 federal crimes and 8 state

crimes—within a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the US Attorney bringing the

case, has committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with

racketeering. Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or

sentenced to 20 years in prison. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains

and interest in any business gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." The act

also contains a civil component that allows plaintiffs to sue for triple damages. When the

U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone under RICO, he has the option of seeking a

pre-trial restraining order or injunction to prevent the transfer of potentially forfeitable

property, as well as require the defendant to put up a performance bond. This provision is

intended to force a defendant to plead guilty before indictment. There is also a provision

for private parties to sue. A "person damaged in his business or property" can sue one or

more "racketeers." There must also be an "enterprise.' The defendant(s) are not the

enterprise, in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not one and the same.

There must be one of four specified relationships between the defendant(s) and the

enterprise.

6.) § 3729. False claims

FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT

The Federal False Claims Act

TITLE 31. MONEY AND FINANCE SUBTITLE III.

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

CHAPTER 37. CLAIMS

SUBCHAPTER III. CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

31 USC § 3729-33

§ 3729. False claims

§ 3730. Civil actions for false claims

§ 3731. False claims procedure

§ 3732. False claims jurisdiction

§ 3733. Civil investigative demands

7.) THE RIGHT TO SUE FOR TORTURE

Case 1 ;07-cv-21783-A) Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/29/2008 Page 6 of

31 7need "to conduct and adhere to a strict choice of law analysis." Id. at 422-23. In

sum, the Tachiona court held that both federal law and international law apply to ATS

and TVPA claims. The Ninth Circuit also conducted an examination of the applicable

choice-of-law for damages in ATS cases, in Alvarez-Machain v. United States 331 F.3d

604, (9th Cir. 2003) rev'd on other grounds, Sosa v. Alvarez-Macham, 542 U.S. 692

(2004). After finding that federal common law applies to the choice-of-law

determination, the court held that it should first look to the Restatement (Second) of

Conflict of Laws, which states that choice of law principles in tort law are governed by

the "most significant relationship" test. Id. at 633-34. (citing Section 145 Restatement

§6). In order to determine what law has the most significant relationship to the tort, the

Restatement looks to the following factors: (a) the place where the injury occurred; (b)

the place where the conduct causing the injury occurred; (c) the domicile, residence,

nationali the relationship, if any, between the parties is centered. Id. At 634. The court

then articulated competing policy factors that should be considered in ATS cases. These

factors included: "(a) the needs of the interstate and international systems, (b) the

relevant policies of the forum, (c) the relevant policies of other interested states and the

relative interests of those states in the determination of the particular issue, (d) the

section of justified expectations, (e)ls basic policies underlying the particular field of

law, (1) certainty, predictability and uniformity of result, and (g) ease in the

determination and application of the law to be applied." Id. at 634 (citing Section 145

Restatement §6(2)). The Alvarez-Machain court held that the totality of the factors,

including the "policy of the United States, as expressed in the ATCA, to provide a

remedy for violations of the law of nations," weighed in favor of applying United States

law. Id. Case 1:07-cv-21783-A) Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/29/2008

Page 7 of 31 8 The federal common law analysis articulated in these precedents favors

the underlying trumped by federal law where the applicable law is inconsistent with

federal common law. As a practical matter, this means that federal courts typically apply

federal common law to damages under the ATS. Here, under Eighth Circuit precedent,

federal common law would apply to the determination of damages under the ATS.

Under the analysis articulated by the Tachiona court, the law of nations and federal

common law would apply to the damages inquiry under the ATS. Tachiona at 419-20.

Under the Alvarez-Machain standard, the "most significant relationship" test favors the

application of Peruvian law, but the relevant policy considerations articulated in the

decision favor the application of federal common law.

The totality of the case law, thus, weighs in favor of applying federal common law to the

determination of damages under the ATS. This Court should award Plaintiffs damages

under federal common law for their ATS and TVPA claims.

8.) JURISDICTION FOR COMPENSATORY DAMAGES AND REMEDIES

Federal Common Law on Damages Once it has been determined that federal common

law applies to the question of damages, it becomes necessary to determine how to

ascertain what the federal common law of damages is, as it relates to damages under the

ATS and the TVPA. In order to determine or to fashion federal common law remedies,

"courts may be guided by appropriate statutes without adopting any in their entirety."de

See Park v. Korean Air Lines Co., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16841,20 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)

(citing Moragne v. State Marine Lines, Inc., 398 U.S. 375, 406-408 (1970); 3 This is true

under both the ATS, which is simply a jurisdictional grant of that enables plaintiffs to

bring claims for violations of established international law, and under the TVPA, which

creates a specific cause of action for claims of torture and extrajudicial killing. In each

case, absent the federal statute, plaintiffs would have no ability to sue in federal court. 4

The application of federal common law to damages under ATS and TVPA cases is also

supported by legal commentators. International Human Rights Litig. in U.S. Courts

states that in ATS litigation M[t]he remedy however, is a 'purely domestic tort remedy'

governed by 'traditional, well-established concepts of federal common law." Beth

Stephens, International Human Rights Litigation in U.S. Courts (Brill Publishers 2008),

citing William R. Casto, The New Federal Common Law of Tort Remedies for

Violations of International Law, 37 Rutgers L.J. 635, 641 (2006). Wright & Miller states

that courts should look to a wide variety of sources, including "considerations of what

rule is best designed to implement the underlying federal policy or statute involved [and]

general considerations of equity jurisprudence." Wright & Miller, Federal Practice &

Procedure § 4518. Although some courts conceptualize this broad inquiry as a choice of

law analysis, they only follow choice of law principles to the extent those principles are

consistent with the federal common law policy objective - enforcing the intent of the

ATS. Most federal court decisions that perform any choice of law analysis do so in the

context of an inquiry over other aspects of ATS law, rather than damages. See e.g. In re

Estate of Ferdinand Marcos Human Rights Litigation (Hilao v. Marcos) 25 F.3d 1467,

1475 (9th Cir. 1994), cert, denied 513 U.S. 1126 (1995) (abatement); Estate of Cabello v.

Fernandez-Larios, 157 F.Supp.2d 1345 (S.D. FI. 2001 (standing). Many of these courts,

although notably not the Eleventh Circuit, cite to the Restatement 2nd of Conflicts or

refer to more traditional choice of law principles drawn from United States Supreme

Court holdings such as Lauritzen v. Larsen 345 U.S. 571 (1953). See e.g. Tachiona at

420 (reviewing pre-2002 case law on choice of law issues). One outlier court based the

choice of law analysis on the law of the U.S. state in which the federal court sits.

Presbyterian Church of Sudan v. Talisman Energy Inc., 453 F.Supp.2d 633 (S.D.N.Y.

2006) (appeal pending). But federal courts have consistently refused to be shackled by

any conventional choice of law principles in ATS cases and if they conduct a choice of

law analysis at all, they do so only within the larger context of the federal common law

which itself allows reference to a broad range flegal principles. See e.g. Filartiga IL

Many courts simply collapse the choice of law analysis into the federal common law

analysis of the appropriate source of law, as the District Court did in Filartiga II. Most

courts facing the issue in this case - assessment of ATS damages after a default —skip a

choice of law analysis altogether and instead rely on previously decided ATS cases that

awarded compensatory and punitive damages. See e.g. Paul v. Avril, 901 F.Supp. 330

(S.D. Fla. 1994).

9.) U.S. law provides a wide range of civil remedies for seeking redress in cases of

torture. These include injunctions, compensatory damages, punitive damages, and

declaratory relief. In addition, the U.S. Congress has authorized the federal

government to bring civil actions to enjoin acts or patterns of conduct that violate

constitutional rights, including those that would amount to torture. At the federal

level, the principal avenues of individual redress are administrative tort claims and

civil litigation. Common law tort actions for assault, battery, wrongful death, civil

actions for violations of federally protected civil rights, suits based on federal

constitutional rights. On the state level, all of our states provide for civil tort suits

to be brought against state officials and many permit damages for violations of

state constitutional rights.

10.) This formal litany of effectively unavailable rights to tortured Guantanamo Bay

detainees and others operates as a secondary layer of Convention violation.

Namely, the violation of the right to an effective remedy for torture. Words in fact,

may be cheap. As Gabor Rona has noted here, there is little new about the

acknowledgement of extraterritoriality official by this US delegation, despite the

hype. Harold K.oh, among other commentators here, has applauded the honesty

and increased transparency of the acknowledgments made before the Committee

(a cheer for the "unequivocal yes"). On that matter, 1 am less persuaded. There is a

grave danger that acknowledgment may blur the ongoing, daily violations of

detainees' human rights. It may also cloud and allow us to forget that there are a

host of other obligations that follow from naming the fact that torture has taken

place. Lest we forget, the United States has a direct obligation to each individual

tortured and subject to cruel treatment at Guantanamo Bay, and that obligation is

one of repair, remedy and restitution.

13.) JUSTICE FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE AND TERRORISM ACT [House

Report 110-844] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] 110th Congress

Report HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 110-844 September 15,

2008.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on State of the Union

and ordered to be printed Mr. Conyers, from the Committee on the Judiciary,

submitted the following REPORT [To accompany H.R. 5167] [Including cost

estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] The Committee on the Judiciary, to

whom was referred the bill (H.R. 5167) to amend the National Defense

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 to remove the authority of the President

to waive certain provisions, having considered the same, reports favorably

thereon with amendments and recommends that the bill as amended do pass.

Other

Richard Lighthouse

T.I. Diagram

The Judiciary Report

FBI Harassed Innocence Scientist

April 17,2018

U. S Government Harassment

September 2, 2010

Stillinthestorm,com

5 Targeted Individuals Expose Shocking

Electronic Harassment and Torture

Tech Times

US Air Force hires civilian drone operators to

control surveillance drones

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below.

OPINIONS BELOW

For cases from federal courts:

The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at Appendix

the petition and is

[X^reported at pA AlA,

; or,

[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,

[ ] is unpublished.

The opinion of the United States district court appears at Appendix

the petition and is

[ ] reported at

; or,

[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,

[ ] is unpublished.

For cases from state courts:

The opinion of the highest state court to review the merits appears at

Appendix"?_!__to the petition and is

[Cp^eported at

or,

[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,

[ ] is unpublished.

The opinion of the _

appears at Appendix

court

to the petition and is

[ ] reported at____

; or,

[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,

[ ] is unpublished.

JURISDICTION

For cases from federal courts:

The date on which the United States Court of Appeals decided my case

was

______

[ ] No petition for rehearing was timely filed in my case.

A timely petition for rehearing was denied by the United States Court of

Appeals on the following date:

&I__________ , and a copy of the

order denying rehearing appears at Appendix_____

[ ] An extension of time to file the petition for a writ of certiorari was granted

to and including __

(date) on

(date)

in Application No.

The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U. S. C. § 1254(1).

For cases from state courts:

The date on which the highest state court decided my case was

A copy of that decision appears at Appendix S

/Afr/&/

[ ] A timely petition for rehearing was thereafter denied on the following date:

---------------------------------, and a copy of the order denying rehearing

appears at Appendix

[ ] An extension of time to file the petition for a writ of certiorari was granted

to and including

(date) on

(date) in

Application No.

The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U. S. C. § 1257(a).

Constitutional And Statutory Provisions Involved

Amendment II (2)

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the

people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Pro Se Ash’s 2nd Amendment

rights were violated as a direct result of false reporting done by the State of Minnesota

though Pro Se Ash holds a conceal and carry in the State of Minnesota and has been a

responsible firearm carrier since 2015.

Amendment IV (4) The right to be safe in his/her home. Pro Se Ash has endured most of

all of the electromagnetic, audio and video harassment in her home(s) being followed

from each address and each state with the same harassment protocol.

Amendment V (5):

Rights in criminal cases No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise

infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases

arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War

or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in

jeopardy of life or limb, nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness

against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;

nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation. Pro Se

Ash’s right to live a productive life has been denied by way of torture, human trafficking

and harassment of an inhumane nature.

Amendment VI (6):

Rights to a fair trial In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a

speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime

shall have been committed; which district shall have been previously ascertained by law,

and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the

witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in her favor,

and to have the assistance of counsel for her defence. The United States Court of Appeal

Eighth Circuit Davenell L ash v. State of Minnesota Case No 21-2232 denied the hearing

without offering any relief from the ongoing harassment allowing the harassment of pro

se Ash to continue to perpetuate.

Amendment VII (7):

Rights in civil cases In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall

exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a

jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to

the rules of the common law. Amendment VIII (8): Bails, fines, and punishments

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual

punishments inflicted. As a direct result of the over policing inflicted upon Pro Se Ash

other law enforcement agencies were able to capitalize on the harassment protocol

violating Pro Se Ash’s civil rights.

Amendment VIII(8)

“Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual

punishments inflicted.” In Pro Se Ash’s arrest and seizure in Ullin, Illinois Pro Se Ash

suffered financial, emotional and physical harm due to the false placement on the

terrorist watch list.

Amendment XIV(14):

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction

thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No

State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities

of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life,

liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its

jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Pro Se Ash’s placement of her name on

a watchlist has greatly compromised her quality of life and pro se never had the

protection of these laws.

VAWA Act

Violence against women act makes it a federal felony to cross state lines to stalk ,

harass, threaten a victim or his/her immediate family. Pro Se Ash’s harassment has

crossed 10 different states and is still actively taking place in Duluth/Superior.

Section 233 of the patriot act prevents the government from claiming sovereign

immunity.

False Imprisonment

False imprisonment is not a lesser included offense of the crime of kidnapping.

Geitner v. State, 59 Wis. 2d 128, 207 N.W.2d 837.

A victim need only take advantage of reasonable means of escape; a victim need not

expose himself or herself or others to danger in attempt to escape. State v. C.V.C.

153 Wis. 2d 145, 450 N.W.2d 463 (Ct. App. 1989).

False imprisonment, or confinement, is the intentional, unlawful, and uncontested

restraint by one person of the physical liberty of another. State v. Burroughs, 2002

WI App 18, 250 Wis. 2d 180, 640 N.W.2d 190, 01-0738.

In the context of false imprisonment, consent means words or overt actions by a

person who is competent to give informed consent indicating a freely given

agreement to be confined or restrained. Under the circumstances of the case, even if

the jury did not believe that the victim said no, a reasonable jury could have

determined beyond a reasonable doubt that she did not consent to the restraint.

State v. Long, 2009 WI 36, 317 Wis. 2d 92, 765 N.W.2d 557, 07-2307.

22 U.S.C CHAPTER 78—TRAFFICKING VICTIMS PROTECTION

Sec.

7101. Purposes and findings.

7102. Definitions.

7103. Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking.

7103a. Creating, building, and strengthening partnerships against significant trafficking in persons.

7104. Prevention of trafficking.

7104a Compliance plan and certification requirement.

7104b.Monitoring and investigation of trafficking in persons.

7104c.Notification to Inspectors General and cooperation with government.

7104d.Rules of construction; effective date.

7104e.Preventing future trafficking in the United States through receipt of complaints abroad.

7105.Protection and assistance for victims of trafficking.

7105a.Increasing effectiveness of anti-trafficking programs.

7105b.Improving domestic victim screening procedures.

7106.Minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking.

7107. Actions against governments failing to meet minimum standards.

7108. Actions against significant traffickers in persons.

7109.Strengthening prosecution and punishment of traffickers.

7109a.Research on domestic and international trafficking in persons.

7109b.Presidential Award for Extraordinary Efforts To Combat Trafficking in Persons.

7110.Authorizations of appropriations.

7111.Report by Secretary of State.

7112. Additional activities to monitor and combat forced labor and child labor.

7113.Accountability.

7114.Efforts to end modern slavery

18 U.S CODE 1001 Statement and entries generally

18 U.S. CODE 2511 Interception and disclosure of wire, oral or electronic

communications prohibited

18 U.S. CODE 2261A Stalking

18 U. S. CODE 1113 Attempt to commit murder

18 U,S, CODE 241 Conspiracy against rights

18 U.S. CODE 2340A Torture

50 U.S, CODE 1520 Use of human subjects for testing of chemical and biological

agents

18 U.S. CODE 1581 Federal crime of human trafficking

609.795 Letter, Telegram, or package tampering opening harassment

609.7495 Physical Interference with safe access to healthcare

609.713 Threats of death

609.714 Crimes committed in furtherance of terrorism

609.687 Adulteration

609.05 Liability for crimes of another

609.495 Aiding and abetting an offender

609.4975 Warning subject of surveillance or search

609.605 Trespassing

609.891 Unauthorized computer access

609.748(1)(A) Harassment

609.765 Defamation

609.749 Harassment and stalking

609.229 Crimes committed for benefit of a gang

609.546 Motor vehicle tampering

169.A78 Aiding and abetting

626A.02 Interception and disclosure of wire, electronic or

oral communications prohibited.

Fair Housing Act

■

• j1

***£&-■ 'f-fi-t, > 4 t />tit 4 f« «/> o

. y /, ■ , ,

*&■<■*&

*£• iuu- /& j^bfrfek

)

4£k±L

^ v4^ Ayddj£.

&444*te

-1 d+Jlt* . 4r sUJ>,iu[

57a

/^,£m jjf f.y,.

if At 4 t<irn,T ^4*^

Jf*

<44^0. * ^A /^.V V

4££2

P^'" ZZt>n flip fU' /UA j j^Ar^ ,JJMjt

-^UJ2ui&ua^(JULt,

t-fJ\Zn,,. , X

—jLddJ^Miu.

—ALdA^iaju 6/h*

NJiflf-hf,*

&JZfL

lx SJ*“tr

4jj6-/Kt

«■

{*zLi^uaaj.

. T/,d

(jA4a fifty ftV

g&^l rfttouji *y . i

J/)t <? -J- ± * i ^

tr r

J&dL. \

-jJuiAAMJ’JLd Ul/j>

{

l*f*A*&

f[-Tl

///o a/m

Jkta. £i

ouJuM

PAJtf , Q-4-Od r An\Aj. [ '.fifthtjj

(itt-Hcd. ajl AM~r Jpf I

lf4Vt*A

. AaaamJ .< iL j.'~j?!v

-±1

k' ^i^yrfta,

U. •'

'\V•r i

|Cj

sw**-lmm

■*

■X

■■

— JIM.

&U4IZ

;

».

/vtj J^yW-M^d^LJZ^ajL

Jjfi/Z^ALL^LteO? flip U •:

;

J/h 6t dd.

JmtjL!

i■

yfJ-A

suAsXJlt £?r f

8SfciSyg^g

pc 14*> Uaa„* /?,|/f .41.

■

f jflr " / ^

lr.

feffef:<** tiwaMArU ihU&UUoouti. jLjf/l

fie^4^dl^cu4<^

• *'

-—4

i^‘L+ffi

fif ‘<-<>-t

vMj> Ir, rtA

tit

1^. A*^/lt ^/>l (

f)J ft. iA It , hjLdiaAm

kjk^LAaln.JJ^’ 4&-^JuA\<K*t <\ fuAJtM.^kAUL___\_

■4

‘ Pp&JSjl AaJ, JJ. .

U t/J A !,D,

t^4UuUAim

if:

'a 5iD

-• 9.

-y*-— ■'*•*-—'

*4 tiuJddu //Jrtm

fSd&taJLdAjd,i----I flif'n

'----- "j- ^^T.1 jJ/^i

) A4

^ A H f H\---....................................... .... .......‘

■<

-r

±,

yf-

■»

./••i

<ct

£|

+%3*x*u=-&4*SiA

Ui^lA

aa^-t

?.!•.

»,

■>

Jl^TvA^

■•

&vpisz

;

ddMAii

;

A/idtj UtfiUbf

/y^.f

^///^>J /hJiloA^L

Md w fUA utJsrJ>J aiMru AJdiLiMj»M £#stfl

UlL>

fldfad&S.

/dA4U&hfjL«£. Pa* *TMi£

- fijtidL)ha ft? MAMk&Qkj AmmMdjjLS^dA

, hr

hfouiffloJ. /t&> Lu^ ^^JitrjliJ'\L

Kn,

ksLMm/j>

AJFMUjifd 1

aL JdUU-M bfyftte wtj

astoMsjj/r Pm sl A

. ^

m4L fflt-. 5meM*j<cK

£#.

’u&

%lA

WIT

iP-rfAAT/tyffl&mL t^tl£p data

uaIi

S&d

M*~U

Wut

__ MS-i

Iuzaa* i /LnJ. A MAttkuCf'

ULflAJULt^^lfolfit

M-ktfi# AA Muf f4 YLaA . QAq Sf ^/.. sJiAfIt ;

dtnjfokJf ittiK* din mCUjAj aj\tJ h\

x 'J UAjf4ej6-M

UJM

mMim

u/J «h jQjfi,§L $oZm

V •

&L..j/*Jfa.A

mmJ£

’Jtibjrfurn

wjm Mj & >

\ GAr .

AM*

’/

''idf/Utdi

Stiffly

' *41

f::.

•:/L.

i -. •'.

. •v

EftBr •,■

•••-

Y\r '' ‘4 j

jjgfo,

■c

;

n'i

•

u/wni 1U*Vu <■TJrLA

A^AAd '2$£

dut<uk

/ ?y .

ud4

15£0$Mm™

—juju mt$SMc y ix*wm*ik

__Ibuifi vfu-l 'hinUt, cgAxrtx* tfi 4k• ..

- ^-'-w

'frldM, LudM iI

At* stdLtih

m StdtkL \.

■2

‘ .-••

. ~v .

-y >

..(

■*

6fyfc** "j

kbeit/M

— 2pw ie StAU4J>. A ^jSMjJa/u

-1 >:

/IjfttA. 'Jlufl/iuQqttM. faA 5* d*L MJOftffl.|

Aa Se tfyfijaeafyjn

Q+J fhb'My'%4k‘ U>/UMM—W2^(d^ Ct\. jLU'j

— tdh ■.

fite___ A ‘

‘

_ jju.

A oWfi-eAf- QIaJ—, i{lu#afjjM 4o M)JmmJL 4&-dbu)&6s 5s Jf*

— jbiti.Jm 5t

/£' tw ■ tifuto*kc

— l/n.$lM4&i ifo£4> JiL dAjud^f &—+—

MaJk*

umfa U&i—L

- Dim Sjj, 4tMdidmJJh*Ljatw&-fc------_ JaJLsk. 4c^mia'&jmH

Sf Ui fast: |jp

_ hMfWJ^MS[ M

1 dk^Lj^

lljAjmjh (<mhbjtty

& dd, _—

d^4pd

frki jt, (UK. .

■ TjLk. djftUtofshttdd l/.dAiJudU AUd, iTt&L-pJUA**____

JMj, ik*!

. tubkjjvjM fi\A &*,d&L /i+ffj<t K ----- 4jr& tlL>iA^44ju tfhu ,

Cj44rfl0#*K-----------&k> St, ^LdA,

^JZrrutg: sjedk_____

oQaa ^i.AaL id <u£id /L /j)fl.J>

‘‘

‘

Mjvf

jlkbfo//J<t\fjA/

tyt fhc.t(tf&WaiJLitntJd. ju>'p

nyHc2Lr>v

Awf., Jl\c Si. dUL <j4u4^d4Tuku^Lcd fj-thhiNa—L

&dJL- lLtMl fnti~frY4< yS *j.

.<a^L.nAdl- ^U.-0^fi&u

1*1 fLt,

I usAn, (ixir*^ Aji\t\)tf fzJ-jj)

/L&4^

// afkjL, 4 rht.qAlfY\ Aau{, (tdUruxirf> '

4JiKLa dj 4dMo 4/L*-' AaSl. &3 Laa T

■4

La^U

fius^d&L----

AmjL AaMvL JLls,.

------•f iWL /^Al-A/>v •

l/:,h J *Jt~ /Uu/L jin M'? <&y*1*^ fa***p4>4Ui4/lu>JLt

■A iJjuAjIiju ,jj/Li hutU*^ .32lJ&l . •:

B->

/UA.

jhjLfi

J<piKjkk

&JUu.tfA

'^rtd'dL^JkO 2u,Mtk>-fcA£*ii

Ll>l fj&tJhi

f r tA/taJlU^/. >0

Y)/>/tot ItJffte'd.

h*«e!» fa ■ jtAA. isJePjMdMAl

<4>

jto. 4^,

/!aa

JUft hjjuJi

,$7Wu/M& &jL>

/•

a i}

<^M ¥>

cn&A4*e^ Mi

§ETfrM*y—

...

yyve .w^. -4^

ji,

'Asfjtfa {J <-$£*>.

/fjts& /M-fU&rf

fteAuist, djiaL- ds1C4Slt&* 4*U±.-- _i—

(t <3#- fa*

dfa-i’vLiA

JMUtd- '

>na & a

flj-n f /f

iuM

dLndL A/£ bt> £*u&(, :

_____^ 'ijh^Atj •-$ryKe'> fito

v_ i

MhA.J 41l ajLuju mJj^u

flAYHj.—

fU %-fU- £&

ftAui. UisLdishAjuiL ^JiiA- wuj—■_

(UeuJbi rJV~&du 4L

/Us) St /IA

tjJj

4p 'Aju

&&&L -UJ*uf UifLi

{LJlhjU&\- ■ O'/uL' fittAJAlA/ap ~cfUsKs d^VtoxOA^f J_

{

ftM if if<M "lutpA

^4 ■fl^ruJAt, J flit* * 4c &

n/iJifitrku, tyvtuAJL UtitL *<\

fan

w 44^M <%&**->

do b/ttyf..—

M-tuwJ/* ■***> J —

4^uAisy900. m /n Hj. <h>f*** -ffi-----&•

JLlj

f.^jt <4Je. /jjLa^jA^sLifi 0uaAamLaa----JfQ.

h/A, Xj</aA^l£_

UtAdJZtxMC'M fu/tV dMJti

*fh^ 5* \/LL. km

/lAuf

f M ¥ /^W>, Q^U ji

pio it*. /Id.

UJU.

”

&& -I

/ <k

*•

jekuhA

. 4U. $u. 4M

/tCAnip^JfoJ amJ' UfC*. . U^i

A*4&- fyk dM frj/Uixtst.. ■ . iu

/^V

'bv.U'H ,MU >

“ & b>Mtyy,

T^/a uJhVpPAHjt. r*> fits fit 44*

---4------

j^i>e (fjijlJit/rA {f J/L/l

n <l

(LiurtJhj

^ift^cAwK/t pM $k

rA : *

ffie. J

UsU> fip

a/ dk'-

;

2*.yry^

4' Lh-m f4ihn^y

/>$£* /.{/. ajU pxiljsi ua-BA* 'i*jfn/$.t—;

fwtytflrA r

njLaa «.., As* faf rXuf

N l-$Jl4Lf ZlM*f'/i^i'f4 ff f*AO .^j

^*^ti4rr\ - *j

Pa* Sr M

, AK^r-^^yu

;

-f

!./•

i , *.

:•

(

/xdi/ifkiut 'fiAfa* dd Jjn

fi/U> $t-

Wt UAAUtVLtsct, SikMuv!,

JAA

tispjjudu SmvjA

(}&> IkhAAJanfrMk

• ■:

vm$r**•***’

4ki

’i

AfA. -£U-&W<' ■»

1. fLbJIfy

fumA&

• •!

ifa/LUta €40« /

fsiAt t>P. $fj\ mMi{ d i;j(UDrfja&T£&t.

;iMfe*

'■ _

mf AthM

;

i/±

/■

r:*TT •?

£ Ajd. ^ j ViA*wwtt

li,

§st

AIL

7ns

r??~.

PJZT***

'■JQfiXtoJU*

m±- • .*': W

[<.

Z-ji

f,'-.

MIMA

ftU)fAuh^ Hfl*>.daAA.hA#A AamA^/wmj

Adi

4p}&

dpt>t'A&u. */l)Lj AX/,

St/ia'’*^**/i5

& Mm

gftf 'F tbnK/U^ /)iii> ■ -^Ue

•,

i Ife

----■■•—

LaaaUjU h*f Ml MMM?

M^ytdujf^Lc.^ 1 fahr-jJU^tlc/h/U^iAA^jVLtt^

f^*

-r,, /ty/r, A/i Se.tfMk /IJ^JVdL/*aJlXL }

J3U4UL

ft hn .4"zl £{U*fJb. Pjo ^JLL-jpt^M^

* ’

1«./ij^ri/>

iffir-tf </ die- Aetinn /ti'it d&f

‘

f4\. ujJu. r

A-i&JiS-

ld4nhJ/Min.>if

.M«*Zf"'-******5,

1 ~

/a^.S . rlj. J!aMl£lsh . (4u 4Lt- kiVU,

./Arn^LuX

%£nh*A$ML iuiJLiktLr*-.

......... ........

Cufw\ 44ut^(Liul£hi£K-±

............... vy

• -4

•;

.-.•1

PU UdeJLth* ojiio fUL/i

£4 SHI 4JU^

\M. ~

'* ‘ "*

yuam

_ .

____ .

^ *5 tAUv^jmi .^'U/Ai.

Aub/if'

j)nfu6

Lkdi^Piutieay'fih. A

, MtMjtj M jlm /IoM u4td. '%h-£La4ilt«txj2A sk .Jt& <M~

- Ht. $qu* Lu <y .&aA/d&m*

■& &A- jxe%h^t^Ji.----t

■

4 .JA,,) ijt A* mAdjh . 4AjL AM-jf.. Im&AMJX-

___

l*JSaX

T4i

iijAiklUutUiM-,

iiL /J '■ ’^.

■

: v

i-Ju

i*v^fcfcrJ

Jh/LidjiMfU'

ffi-;

dU jaus aJUt*pL vJjiA._ t±* Jnjuttyct

(AMUtu>

At-4/llc6u^&i£ /yt/L/tit,.

AJk£t*s>'i: sJa

<Ujiy-4U2tA^

yAuiu*.0* MmA-Q ’^ sk/tt. iiut M UmL

A«4*t> m*mm, ijt

m t&fi

**■

't,i4A

3fc

wic

JbM

ifaAkfcQMAnu+Jt fl/ia Se- dtA. U'J**-

-1

M 4? lAM&tdtL 0Li &ua iibi-hih^t

/W 5/ d*A AMidiar/ti/-aMt£^4—^—

’~*v& tvJLtA UaM~^

\:a. 1

uru/mj! /fop $t AUM _—

LttJLrnt- i£tA±.j&£a ££(f M tfU' ’ktYtf/jA*<ud£eAM££L

faf hu£uS ,MlJ Po

JJIA-*

frl 4^- :-Ujisj4gtffr<#tedi£L-

ui&6 ^.-{Urtj dvffcuaA' {i/XcaA AJgirtrisat

-I '

)

...

. _ .

Got

fkcJk<t u

■i‘

. /

■

;

y, lUAejjudl m puycfajteAh

-. 1

• .•*

W: '

}

uadtrf

*JM.

y/msl

i j

9?&4Ludtil

•! .•

xjki&AJjJ/ bij bjbit)

$far Msta* dwt~ 4t

•:

< i

■JM

fy-

:;v •

v£uj

Vi'S

vTT

r.;

t •

JL AvIj

: li'\'r •

hfi S MM. wMade^dj -tjt/jji .juji-U &MM

:-il

,'.s

EM 5l ^ pjM ptMMra^ , ^

' /J

fcMuo XjtiuM.ft Jte&iifajg .3fef ^

}

:■

;

-;.

->.2

'oft

*v&

+•

».**.>?.

»/i

> i'

Jfr

'i .

<4**

Htft

liX

f/ iit

■

.'::

;

#,/.

‘V

;

kind.

—:

ifd-mMt'&ptfMaL ■ rtf $ Mai

, i4 idtiJhn&tt, /ImJL A'Muj dtbieJ.

fl&L lud41

_ I^AJUtidlji fat UM#LjtytaHfthM%JiM wJl ttyfoE ^ik

/tyi0. $e. ddl Iced&t a jhmS.

V•

- ftcd ufLtn otjiMf/isiy jAji luyrU. hfddaxs,

. uJjjb^Uau^UjfiiA^amU M/jptA\wg

. f»bmash hJLtijfhMs . fi*? f>J Aj> A. L>^ ^ jnr»m> . j

^Mji-IoiMkUmlK U#dll UuMu 0Ju0uM-}U&,

IpKL-jatu Q*i}aAjk} kuf. Vldiitjbe.e.-6't4&£fl 4-.

___ , Qjr/fj/)-LgAOM**/Mtstii- £&,

jAiJlt^ furrn. '/•liobi^, JLlKi (rt&Ms). i>)du loicki

!.•

umtA-r^ ^^M^-a^d-gUrji^U^-sUt. cUa?. p&A^nupfitibi

. i

ftjju dhstJ $ LitjLfi$ A/ /VjjrrtfL.

- fy&n&Le&d,

& &$fik

j b-Li f^jtui U<x*m MdyM,MS.Jwi&i$ 'U&ttu

- rdmj M&S-U 4, jMWii< OHM*

, tjmjj

OjJ/jAauM C^,k.aAk/Jj

&jk*jm

•3

as thd yr

>F*»j

—

mMMAdt

mMbm

. . . Mt w&um*

' $su.£

3|,J.

, » •;«

■

iaiCm.

wcfaLAml

oMm.

*>S!V'

\’

M4iU*m

m^-

•: -I'-

its *.'

•V

• fi

uvufo &4fStu* fofUdp > Jk

At*0.4

W .it feJw-----

r»s4m q/Ul a. y A/uiua. fit__ __ ____

_ __

QdMjlun

d-Sf

% dU J^dc-St

—ItAd

i&tun&dsiOl hd4AU#u*ir* & Mtdts j------ml&JhuLlq4k.uua.il.. j____

;^WAo 5^

foftLluutf <!4i (UtnJPuM j —_

OuAi—_

sU^ fad- AU

td.9tiL£.

tu AlMdy/j,Ub'k& tskJH*'

#rtiic mati&tis

j iAJ-L^^Mlgaitt^-A. ziaffLs^-fU/faAhtui. JjAiji—

U&qiu

luM./at «djus\3uft

7Tir h *- '

H4jl ObMUb iaAj’ZWi

i •

]•

{xMbd „•JUffl u

\'i

$,(,<&jfcu* • tyJk. dJl&fn^b'h

■ i

/tfUdtQ&ttt

^4=

iik

iAth

■A

^Ux4U

!)A ,

mfU^y

A^44lUj-sfa

%0 Stj d$P> Umt^JU}J^

tit

—

- 5.

f;-J

YHh

d« '■fyr/t^i dJQaMsL

la dlt>. tSAtiftniuh* ^(tkMkAAMm^ &n JmA. fumte .

V-)xj> sit,

^Mifr[Lf A ilSLi- fi/M&iji.. Ajj^Lcm^

, ^u-fej/lL> ;j|^> ftjfcff/ l J*\dseA fa At . aA Jjg> (Ijlri[ •

(

^21, . ^ riA jg,

%tyA

s Wt/

■

VU 77

. M \£$p

tj(<

/yl#~

ft*)*- m c>dt*hA*ik'.Lito

il/51

Alikirsfaif&i fra \Uk/ \-4fr v>JftA

Mlt&jLtk ,pb£. $idL

jhJti

foitoJj' /htJp

•f1

- .,

............

-itot

’frfol/Vv .XtH-f>L)>/H » nl

P?d &£, UsdK.

U>7>\}^ ,Jj\tjL\J) P )lftluhS \jj ^AJl d$ ■£) I^JthjfiJi^,!

flhJkA tr* (\iX <sk(Luf cu£ de>}jfb*\°^-hno^Ad

iX jf i/tLA h>Jn^Jr La a^rf'j

.QA-LJXuAtO

[il/lA > Jm uJj PpA nwiA PCO^iP /2^JL (l&ldd K&&J

-A

\ I fr? hJ/£&\ ILd^Kg- iofrrt^O-^ (UXLj(LnQ 4-£g_

-4^vy>

fLA //I

^ /ifli

rt^\.j)A(\/?iJ>.. £L*A V\JlO(Im . \A*i\cnli*x^

•i

,(lfe^ Q$u\^ ltll-. {ryiJL-kij out, >___

. rA.

\S?

pAi

d/> j\M\ty 1 0£&i,

- JUdA-ikb

akfcfru.

/Li

rim JUS , MaA$

jjL

h&foX^UCAL

3krt?^J

ut 3K

i mM

M4m

U&a

■:i

.mAoL

<j—ii—t——- ok±L~pmA t

te/LjUXjUUUd'Lj M<,

;f y/^

C^LSC/ida y/)thi)a*-&4 UiJ)jj,*~.<\b*_ (\Lthu

ujK&'5r.-*}t fi'pri.Jlrl

ltrf*d2Lau£&JLu&*

Jf?]

Q^JU^^mcLAA

OiMJki sUf

►'

». Ju»

-i

,+A

£P

■Mco. r>j (kk tJ\/u ahihJrt*

A~'n •“*'“■ SJk /ft>

(1)AA KjlAJlA

—

m*-

Jrlsrh* iJL ,J . _ x ®

vMd

;-ii

X lA-lrf ^^Ovt yQ Qj-fcjeJcj

dJuw , 11 m y *yitrt 1 h trA-Uf ,\ / a ^ at

t t!•

L^hi-Se^AdA 9-O^Li-Jzi/ bp7.

— $&L CL&lO-W~ l AjTM fi t

— toJl^n^lUu^ -i^ t,

7*>

•^■Ad^^gal

......

-M^a4k

-Uetp tfr> .ATU^rl.^ruo-f-; /T*i>

...-f ^ -]

—

-fLufi*j-^n* c££xdl )xdhJA*,. A u>j^

IUi^

OtfeoA,

■£

..... .

UM^aik.

-ii

;

J/^*T

„...

\}tJm

.fiMt**,/! /A«!£^iAg,

pffy„-**&*/„

{

^pj^ejC cs^S i^t2&L

jjjj (jf{A 4

—

’Jte£t=L

*22ti

\...-

\&/*/Ldj&tt*to}A( 1

y S iU£&5L t3^

*<ujt4 >!W

' ,vr:-'

4 ^sgA

g4g|g^ ^^M^pJLdo^ Mq/Jj

-7.

*T?

-V.

“ ^-X&kjSmd L/£a*m J

%&J&eL

*. i

(

-----^

/t 1 rf A

;

fouM&.QpiAAMj AmA Lulaj Uv

, At /LfttiJL c1651 fhM Si <UJL

Q*M*1. (aJT ,

JuX

•.

'xzuu*e.

'/LL

'Aa?k)

jJl^iA^ad-rnjLrrt

. Uju£j^Jk ■ ~f£h#i i!

/£ .

Mi 7

<^_4_—•

rfdL.4/ rJhjjjA^JaufrU-' Mr&tSUts jj, £yt\Ml^>le

±<£^+ju£Ld^j!L^ lusLchUi? /hh£siJk>r

. V

hjfaTAJCtcstVX pH^rm

■hObA-+^l—^ ^tLa'£

<d/i ,

yuulne^t.wnvu~ ft

. *J7dA\/A

•.

AJM

JlAdi/tstufn 4^ l/hflAJjMUtP 7^> fcrt^Ju tjfiXjU).

„.faULtXciri( uUz hzA pAufrjA

‘

£3=i

•_

4£**tJb6U

•>%.

>^L /LL

£Ctar ^/u3PL

;•

fikLsJUUfi

yuj

yp^.

Jt&ukJ-

%k-jUj±Ha „ fr.

H biouttu* Xo

/4n Q'fatju \uM~

\^tLjifju&>', uJ£a^L

d£Ui

±Jl&A AA.<vyuij<yuL4i i flfijjuL- "th iftel

QAdauhk

jjtv. ^hix

6jl/Q

Qjha' Juu) I

cf OkAxtd V7ij*nJ/i. Dtl id>

tL OuttLt’^uj(l$'

S I&UaAo^-.lPUm

/MJU ^ Jf\

1 SM^LKJL -Jt^f (tMj-£J>Lir$ IXLOA jXuJJUlj

’brUx^U txxxAjc s((JU&UuZ'dtL. (\Wh

/2J^

>c %jlkujLaJpSiMju^ &Mh. olfjJ, <& 'tMbjtylQ A TfEtsiLO$X\

tr»

a r«-L-l.|f j/\j\ca

^ Ofiyxljxct& /),/.____

JhAjUi fiJlih. '^f^O Su.

~CK£) * !

flmmuP u\b> Jhk l^ikPt /aXjfcf

hfbiXXJpCtuT^t> 0*^1 Lstjrfrx /I

X ^XL>i\ll fitl ~pl/>

—1— 5~«,/2aIv^[Lu> ^hjfrUurf Q/H ’b*/yu£t/fr\, b&lLb t&Ahi/’f<Lt.

________\isW\njMj '

-1"

MAx.

\A%SUa~ ^[(Jksu uk^7j. rtLiy'Kjt jonux

Ji&nvfaLejcl £L*xA ~t$JL La^uitmv^ (iJ)cA, // xl^b Jau&a

' y^C,

flaJ? Lm£W)

cK,Am^a/

bfiuuUhS

JHLUr^ ftsfxA jAJLAVYLL*\, \

:R«

phtftd &aJ? hjuka r*fcKAwbfj}j>4AdP

ytx&t&un (Jiaml.

. ... - -

uj&a

___ ________________________________________ ’

U^i

&tfy£tA&J! ^ OAvbu^xly.,

•

lAi

Jv/Ll ix

'XnA-

%a&baijCi

4r-&^d^

L'J

laMtflf *n)

ybajL.h I±*ujJ <h

Tti fj'/*

/I */)

——L

<i4p

* -

^ -riL-. -*;i

ZMgi

f /ftruoA.■~ag-tAij Md'.'ZHf d*__

ig^Eua^v^LaJ^L t

,Jnu^n 77^?/

» '

4±dLt%&__

}

(ZLiuj

;

-K

;

Lj3utxd*A

jU/J

'V-

flAX fjy/lA L *

,LKJ '

** ^

*h?h

(tidt

0*^

■

K&U&-

’

;

41A

~^)x/') v\i_ /Li-A . ZAjiA^JUja

•

ruw A M d /MMt i

£214.

y^^AlujJ^x

JZU^Z^4*4juJL-

)-dhiJkh^

«*

j$jl^mJLu^L

zL j’^rm ',dL#vif. i

Ukl

uTdZ

oAnZm DutyU f/'iUnd; M’S 4#cM.

\J uv. /llJ? {$AjtyuL Wsbtfr4jU>, ^Huj

jtv\ dsfm on o&+ic

'UtitsSVLi&.JUk I

AhfaA. /Uul- 4 ^ ^ i

l^hjuiZ

h \fi1hj)v\, /l fJ'l \fc

44 fZ^lUS-rl^AhMd^nf^ct.

dt Ji^ukx^ £

/frf ? /LUl plfijtpnPj U%^l^L^^dAdj2LA^lSA^ ;

Aulup, tlJ’&n-' LAAjaA^ rf/p A -mi. d^^fc^l/^L&t-C'

fL>

T^XT^T^ **T*Mh*bh to ^

/A'lhslo /^

Vt*

l^tX /V

zkju/ z£

■«*'

•J

■{?

flakcL

ct’yULMs

;jUa/

•4

lsS&Msk~*jtl

2SC.

dYctyu* fa/jts

M(L

MjLih

SSL

trj

--(

Reasons for Granting the Certiorari

In May of 2009 1 opened my first business with very little money and very little support. 8 years later I

had grown the business into a self-supporting very much needed ethnic beauty supply that served all

races, preferences and all income levels. At that time my business was located in Duluth, Mn and I

resided in Superior, Wi, we are connected by a bridge. Law enforcement Duluth, Mn falsified my

name on a watchlist in 2017 with the sole intention to murder me after placing mevin the research

program/humantrafficking/gangstalking harassment program. Illegal surveillance, constant audio, video

and radiation harassment have all played a part in this community reality harassment show with open

displays of unified involvement. Cameras have been moved in my space to capture my facial

expressions as they use radiation and emf to my feet and ankles. The average civilian would not have

access to the many different forms of military weaponry that is being used in my harassment. With our

expanding technology field we can now operate drones, place fake news and fake videos on the

internet, cause irreparable financial damage to unsuspecting citizens and hack phones and computers

from the comfort of home. I have exhausted all levels of the government from Mayor, Senator,

Secretary of State, Attorney General, DOJ, ACLU, FBI, city counsel men and women and attempted to

reach out to battered women shelter only to find harassment worse than were I left from. Since

approaching the courts for relief the harassment has quadrupled and it is only by the grace of GOD that

I am here to ask for the Writ of Certiorari and the Writ of Extraordinary Relief due to the severity of my

harassment. I have been forced to deal with harassment 24/7 seven days a week. These agencies are

literally hosting live radiation burnings and 1 am the unwilling participant. The audio in my home, car

and business is constant and they do not lower the volume during shift change. 1 literally hear the night

shift brief the day shift and then the insults and slander start with a new energy no matter what shape 1

am in. If I attempt to stay in my home and sleep direct energy and radiation are ran under my bed from

head to toe in a attempt to cook me alive. I then go to my car where drones are waiting to do what

didn't happen inside my home. This is every home and hotel 1 have occupied in MN and WI since 2017

every single day and night. I am stalked, harassed and attacked with military weapons for no reason.

The powers that be made decisions on my life without my consent and when the direct energy failed to

do the intended job they then moved to radiation at inhumane levels to produce disease and kill. The

number of participants can easily be in the thousands with more and more people stepping up. The law

enforcement in my area watches the onslaught from a distance only to intervene to support a

gangstalker. My business has been illegally entered at least 3 times and we have only been open 2 1/2

months. If I am in the business alone I am attacked by radiation all day with emf in my feet and upper

mid back. The audio is constantly going with the same participants from Hibbing, Mn and the State of

Mississippi drone operators literally taking the lead in commentating all the verbal and radiation

attacks. It is not unusual to hear 6 to 10 people insulting, defaming, threatening and agreeing with one

another, chiding, laughing. My business, home and car all have cameras and drones out side and inside

at all times in a attempt to isolate, record illegal video and to assassinate with multiple participants.

Even as I write these perpetrators are commenting on the content in this writ while they attempt to use

electromagnetic radiation in my upper back behind my heart. I literally had to purchase 4 industrial

blowers to keep the high amounts of radiation from overwhelming me. During the entire legal

preparation from the beginning until this point the radiation harassment has been non-stop only getting

worse as well as every other area of harassment. 1 can't place orders from my business or make phone

calls. Calls are literally dropped and blocked from my phone. My email sends a message stating no

such address. My Sba loan has been sabotaged so severely I feel it is unrepairable. My gmail account

has been stolen and used for financial sabotage. My computer has crashed 20 times since preparing this

Writ though it is brand new and dozens more times while preparing my other court cases. My car has

been my only refuge and it has been out fitted with cameras, audio and electromagnetic radiation as

well. The neighbors gather at night to host viewing gatherings and to participate. The key fob to my car

has been duplicated and at whom evers will I have been purposely stranded at gas stations and remote

places only to have gangstalkers arrive to complete the harassment protocol. They use the audio

harassment to alert me as to there doings while it is taking place. The audio and video in my bathroom

space has the most importance to these people so much so I bathe in a swimsuit. Upon entering the

bathroom they do a camera check and a white man responds, “Yep” from there if I attempt to clean

private areas of my body a white female will shout out in mocking laughter as if to say “we got you

shaving”. This is also where the attempted dehumanization takes place for them while being studied for

injury from the radiation harassment. These people monitor my bathroom toilet habits closely being

that runny stool is a direct side effect of radiation exposure along with dizziness and kidney problems.

Coughing is also a side effect of direct energy being aimed at your chest area so my gangstalking

consist of many people following me laughing and coughing. For some reason I stopped coughing

when attacked. These people quickly moved to a gas which immediately produced coughing fits.

Yesterday while at the gas station the need was so great that the attendant did so over the loud speaker

prompting everyone to turn around. By cameras being placed in my business 1 have had to file reports

on illegal entries the most recent was a personal purchase of a high end make up which was

contaminated causing massive burning to my skin. My eating habits are non existence due to the fact

that most if not all food at home has been contaminated. I left my family over 20 years ago, they

haven't been much of a supporting factor and I have become self sufficient because of that fact. I was

studied and chosen for this harassment because of my distant family relations. I have never been

suicidal or violently aggressive. 1 believe in the Almighty and I take all major decisions to him first. I

am not a saint by far but I can carry my own weight. The level of harassment I have endured would

break the average person. I can’t begin to explain all the body health issues I am experiencing because

of this harassment. We have authorities in place to do their jobs with integrity instead we now have an

overwhelming amount of bigotry and cowardism ready to perpetuate any inhumane practice while

he/she hides in the background while others do his/her ill will. By listening to the audio harassment I

know there are ten people from law enforcement/military that operate the electromagnetic radiation

harassment. 3 white women , 3 white men and 3 black women. During my time in Hibbing, Mn when

the audio harassment was amplified there was one black woman participating. I later ran into that

woman unexpectedly and the bank. Soon after the encounter I didn’t hear her voice in the audio.

Hibbing, Mn is predominately white, there are no black people to participate. Upon moving to Oxford,

Mississippi the program was transposed in that state where there is no shortage of black people. The

black female from Hibbing, MN has been replaced by 3 black females from Mississippi one of which

repeats the exact same thing the other black woman did. One of the women from Mississippi was

responsible for all of the drone attacks in that state. This woman is very aggressive, angry and abusive,

she along with the white male drone operator from Hibbing, MN commentate all of the radiation

attacks for the other viewers. This is literally being played out as a live snuff show every night.

Neighbors are gathering to watch and participate in these attacks every night (I Have video) while the

participants make threats, insults, laughter, hillbilly hollars, etc. This entire area is aware that this is

taking place both Superior, Wi and Duluth, Mn and no one has tried to intervene. This is truly out of

control and from the comments I hear these people make they are confident that they will not be

charged for the multiple crimes they have committed. Last night and every night since preparing this

writ I have been attacked by drones in my car with full audio harassment. Upon leaving that area to go t

o the store I am met by 6 to 10 gangstalkers to further the attack and then to my home to dress for the

day where emf is used in my feet and ankles, DEW if I stand in one place long enough, radiation if 1 sit

or attempt to lay down, As I prepare for my shower the audio becomes more insulting while being in t

he shower camera and drone checks are done. If I take a bath the drones are then surrounding the under

side of the tub aiming for my head neck area or my feet. The audio then turns to the removal of my

bathing suit as they attempt to capture naked photos, insults are then hurdled again by the same people

since inception plus the addition from MS. Once I am dressed and have moved to hair and make up

then the insults start again , radiation from above and below begin, the white men then begin to

verbalize their disapproval by allowing me to hear “Yuk”, “Ugh”, “Ugly”, etc. Then I am off to work

where audio, video, radiation and emf are used all day long in the same fashion. If I sit or stand to long

radiation is used, if I am in the shop alone audio harassment is done all day long, if customers come in

they watch the interaction and make subtle negative sounds like, “ unn unph” as if to suggest no, “Uhh

Huh” as if to agree, and then the others are “ick”, “yuk”, “ughh. Most of the handlers do not verbalize

they make noises to confirm or deny. If they do verbalize the audio is turn way down so you can't hear

the conversation. Most if not all of the audio is used to scare, and intimidate. I literally listen to this

younger black female say “I'm dead” all day long. This was an expression used by my roomate as if to

say “I'm dieing laughing” , they recorded this and play it at least 25 times a day, especially as I am

preparing this Writ. At the shop I am forced to listen to white women, black women and white men

sling insult and agree with one another, they also instigate all attacks made by the female drone

operator from MS to keep that going, the Hibbing, Mn drone operator is always agreeing, defending

and supporting the MS drone operator in every conversation they allow me to hear. I'm not sure why

these people allowed this much to transpire but it is truly out of control. Everything they are doing to

me at this point rely on the soul operation of drones, radiation, DEW. A Few nights ago I heard Rich

Lee verbalize on the audio harassment and told the harassment crew, “I want her dead”, after that

drones were sent to my location at a much higher capacity and I am being attacked by these drones

every night since. These drones have the capability to move thru any object with little interference and

no doubt damaging any living organism in it's path. I assume to allow me to hear him verbalize his

intention that would some how deter me from writing this Writ but truth be told if you use any form of

radiation on a person, is it not your intention to harm? The extremes of my harassment and attempted

murder are literally being publicized with full community agreement. I feel I was chosen to exploit for

a larger reason. When the Duluth Police force came to my business to tow my car it was a customer

whom told me they were towing a car and were outside laughing about it, she had no idea that it was

my car. The news of that happening spread in Duluth/Superior via facebook within 15 minutes of its

happening. These displays of unity are open displays of white privilege and white power. To know that

you can violate a person's civil rights in the open with complete confidence and other white people will

support you good or bad. This is the same process only on a much larger scale. Blacks don’t fair well in

The justice system and these people have been operating in a self sustaining system that allows for

crimes against humanity to be committed and concealed at the same time. I have a good amount of

evidence substantiating my claim that 1 will submit upon request. I am also open to taking a lie detector

test if the courts deem it necessary. I ask for the courts to allow this Writ of Cetiorari to be heard for the

simple reason that my daughter’s name is also on this terrorist watch list. We cannot allow the

cowadism of a few to undermine the entire law enforcement system for the sole purpose of feeding an

elevated sense of self pride. Just to hear these people justify their actions and their displays of unity one

can only ascertain that this is truly without guidance and we should do our best to expose and eliminate

all such vigilante behavior. 1 am asking the courts for damages in both compensatory and punitive as

these agencies willingly knew the level of harassment their were inflicting was illegal and torturous on

all levels.

CONCLUSION

The petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted.

Respectfully submitted,

Date:

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.