Amicus Curiae Brief — Jane Doe, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court briefNov 30, 2020
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
No. 20-559
================================================================================================================
In The
Supreme Court of the United States
---------------------------------♦---------------------------------
JANE DOE, PETITIONER
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
---------------------------------♦--------------------------------ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
---------------------------------♦--------------------------------BRIEF FOR GRADUATES OF U.S.
SERVICE ACADEMIES AS AMICI CURIAE
SUPPORTING PETITIONER
---------------------------------♦--------------------------------JENNIFER K. BROWN
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
250 W. 55th St.
New York, N.Y. 10019
BRIAN R. MATSUI
Counsel of Record
ADAM L. SORENSEN
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
2000 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, D.C. 20006
(202) 887-8784
BMatsui@mofo.com
Counsel for Amici Curiae
NOVEMBER 30, 2020
================================================================================================================
COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964
WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE .........................
1
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ...............................................................
4
ARGUMENT ........................................................
5
PROPER APPLICATION OF THE FERES DOCTRINE TO SEXUAL ASSAULT IS A MATTER
OF PRESSING NATIONAL IMPORTANCE ....
5
A.
B.
C.
There Is An Unchecked Epidemic Of Sexual Assault And Sexual Harassment At
U.S. Service Academies ..............................
5
Service Academies Have Fostered An Environment That Tolerates And Sometimes
Encourages Sexual Violence Against
Women........................................................
9
The Feres Doctrine Should Not Stand As A
Barrier To Addressing This Vital Issue ....... 15
CONCLUSION..................................................... 19
ii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Page
CASES
Doe 1 v. Baylor Univ.,
240 F. Supp. 3d 646 (W.D. Tex. 2017)......................16
Doe v. Emerson Coll.,
153 F. Supp. 3d 506 (D. Mass. 2015) .......................17
Doe v. Hagenbeck,
98 F. Supp. 3d 672 (S.D.N.Y. 2015),
rev’d in part, 870 F.3d 36 (2d Cir. 2017) .................11
Facchetti v. Bridgewater Coll.,
175 F. Supp. 3d 627 (W.D. Va. 2016) .......................16
Feres v. United States,
340 U.S. 135 (1950) ....................................... 4, 15, 17
Ross v. Univ. of Tulsa,
180 F. Supp. 3d 951 (N.D. Okla. 2016) ....................16
Shank v. Carleton Coll.,
232 F. Supp. 3d 1100 (D. Minn. 2017).....................16
STATUTES
20 U.S.C. § 1681(a)(4) .................................................16
Federal Tort Claims Act .............................................15
OTHER AUTHORITIES
Bruce Keith, The Transformation of West Point
as a Liberal Arts College, 96 Liberal Education
(Spring 2010), https://www.aacu.org///west-pointliberal-arts-college ..................................................17
iii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued
Page
Craig Whitlock, McMaster Rebuked by Army in
2015 for His Handling of Sexual Assault
Case, WASH. POST (Mar. 2, 2017), https://www.
washingtonpost.com/investigations/mcmasterrebuked-by-army-in2015-for-his-handling-ofsexual-assault-case/2017/03/02/e8421a8e-fe8b11e6-8ebe-6e0dbe4f2bca_story.html .........................7
Defense Advisory Committee, Report On Investigative Case File Reviews For Military Adult
Penetrative Sexual Offense Cases Closed In
Fiscal Year 2017 (2020), https://dacipad.
whs.mil/images/Public/08-Reports/08_DACIPAD_
CaseReview_Report_20201019_Final_Web.pdf .........9
Dep’t of Def., Annual Report on Sexual Assault
in the Military Fiscal Year 2018 (2019),
https://www.sapr.mil/sites/default/files/DoD_
Annual_Report_on_Sexual_Assault_in_the_
Military.pdf ................................................................8
Dep’t of Def., Annual Report on Sexual Harassment and Violence at the Military Service
Academies Academic Program Year 2010–2011
(2011), https://sapr.mil/public/docs/reports/
FINAL_APY_10-11_MSA_Report.pdf ..................12
Dep’t of Def., Annual Report on Sexual Harassment and Violence at the Military Service
Academies Academic Program Year 2012-2013
(2014), https://www.sapr.mil/public/docs/reports/
FINAL_APY_12-13_MSA_Report.pdf ........................7
iv
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued
Page
Dep’t of Def., Annual Report on Sexual Harassment and Violence at the Military Service
Academies, Academic Program Year 2017-2018
(2019), https://evawintl.org/wp-content/uploads/
APY17-18_MSA_Report_FINAL.pdf.................. 5, 6, 7
Dep’t of Def., Annual Report on Sexual Harassment and Violence at the Military Service Academies, Academic Program Year 2018-2019
(2020), https://www.sapr.mil/sites/default/files/_
DoD_Annual_Report_on_Sexual_Harassment_
and_Violence_APY18-19.pdf ............................... 6, 10
Dep’t of Def., Directive 6495.01: Sexual Assault
Prevention and Response Program (2008) .............13
Dep’t of Def., Evaluation of the Separation of
Service Members Who Made a Report of Sexual
Assault (2016), https://media.defense.gov/
2016/May/09/2001714241/-1/-1/1/DODIG-2016088.pdf .......................................................................8
Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, Military Sexual Trauma
General Fact Sheet (2020) .........................................8
Derrick Bryson Taylor, West Point Cadet’s Rape
Conviction Is Overturned, Drawing Criticism,
N.Y. TIMES (June 9, 2019), https://www.ny
times.com/2019/06/09/nyregion/west-point-cadetrape-case.html ...........................................................9
Diane L. Rosenfeld, Uncomfortable Conversations: Confronting the Reality of Target Rape
on Campus, 128 HARV. L. REV. F. 359 (2015) .........17
v
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued
Page
Editorial Board, Charges against midshipmen
raise concern about Naval Academy’s commitment to addressing sexual assault, BALT. SUN
(Nov. 1, 2019), https://www.baltimoresun.com/
opinion/editorial/bs-ed-1103-assault-navalacademy-20191101-vxalielz4zbxnmma-.html........14
Elizabeth Aguilera et al., Roots of Sexual-Abuse
Problem at Air Force Academy Run Deep, DENVER POST, Aug. 17, 2003 ............................................8
Esther B. Fein, The Choice, N.Y. TIMES MAG.
(May 5, 1985), https://www.nytimes.com/1985/
05/05/magazine/the-choice.html ...............................7
Grace Lichtenstein, A Year Later, N.Y. TIMES
(Sept. 11, 1977), https://www.nytimes.com/1977/
09/11/archives/a-year-later-how-women-arefaring-at-the-air-academy.html ................................7
Greta Anderson, More Title IX Lawsuits by Accusers and Accused, INSIDE HIGHER ED (Oct. 3,
2019), https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/
10/03/students-look-federal-courts-challengetitle-ix-proceedings .................................................16
Inspector General, Dep’t of Def., Evaluation of
the Department of Defense’s Handling of Incidents of Sexual Assault Against (or Involving)
Cadets at the United States Military Academy
(March 24, 2020) .....................................................10
vi
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued
Page
Inspector General, Dep’t of Def., Evaluation of
the DoD’s Handling of Incidents of Sexual
Assault Against (or Involving) Cadets at the
United States Air Force Academy (Sept. 30,
2019) .................................................................. 10, 11
James LaPorta, Cadet Run Out of West Point
After Accusing Army’s Star Quarterback of
Rape, The Daily Beast (Dec. 8, 2017), https://
www.thedailybeast.com/cadet-run-out-of-westpoint-accusing-armys-star-quarterback-of-rape ........14
Jay Price, Battling Depression And Suicide
Among Female Veterans, National Public
Radio (May 29, 2018), https://www.npr.org/
2018/05/29/614011243/battling-depressionsuicide-among-female-veterans ..............................15
Michael L. Hansen & Shanthi Nataraj, RAND
Arroyo Center, Identifying Civilian Labor
Market Realities for Army Officers Making
Stay/Leave Decisions (2012), https://www.rand.
org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9653.html ..................18
Service Women’s Action Network, The Mental
Wellness Needs of Military Women: Community Driven Solutions (2018), https://www.service
women.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2018Annual-Summit-Report-Final.compressed.pdf .......15
U.S. Military Academy, Army Regulation 150–1,
United States Military Academy Organization, Administration, and Operation (2019),
https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/D
R_a/pdf/web/ARN5862_AR150-1_FINAL.pdf ........18
vii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued
Page
U.S. Military Academy at West Point, Academics: Majors and Minors, https://www.westpoint.edu/academics/majors-and-minors (last
visited Nov. 23, 2020) ..............................................17
Valerie A. Stander & Cynthia J. Thomsen, Sexual Harassment and Assault in the U.S. Military: A Review of Policy and Research Trends,
181 Military Medicine 20 (2016) (Supplement 1)........15
BRIEF FOR GRADUATES OF
U.S. SERVICE ACADEMIES
INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE1
Ashley Anderson is a graduate of the United
States Air Force Academy. She holds a Master’s degree
in philosophy from the University of Texas at Austin
and a J.D. from Yale Law School.
Jennifer Bower is a former U.S. Air Force captain
and a graduate of the United States Air Force Academy.
She has worked in financial crime investigations and
research and analysis roles in support of law enforcement, government, non-governmental organization,
commercial, and Department of Defense clients.
Kezziah Dale is a former U.S. Air Force captain
and a United States Air Force Academy graduate. She
holds a J.D. from Boyd School of Law at UNLV and
specializes in Federal Native American Law.
Allison Doerter is a former U.S. Air Force captain
and a graduate of the United States Air Force Academy.
She has held various project management positions
and is currently working in production agriculture.
No counsel for a party authored this brief in whole or in
part, and no person other than amicus or its counsel made a monetary contribution to its preparation or submission. The parties
received timely notice and have consented to the filing of this
brief.
1
2
Dr. Ellen Haring is a retired U.S. Army colonel and
West Point graduate, and is the Director of Research
and Programs at the Service Women’s Action Network
(SWAN) and a senior fellow at Women in International
Security (WIIS). She has a Master’s degree in Public
Policy and a Ph.D. in Conflict Analysis from George
Mason University. At WIIS, she directs the Combat
Integration Initiative project, and she is an adjunct
associate professor at Georgetown University where
she teaches courses on Human Security and Women,
Peace and Security.
Lindsey Kirchhoff is a former U.S. Air Force captain. She is a graduate and former faculty member of
the United States Air Force Academy. She holds a
Master’s degree in philosophy from Boston College
and is a J.D. candidate at Pepperdine Caruso School
of Law.
Caroline Jacobs is a former U.S. Army lieutenant
and a West Point graduate. She holds a Ph.D. from
Washington State University and is an Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner.
Sandra Limon is a retired U.S. Army lieutenant
colonel, who graduated from West Point in 1995. Since
retirement she has served in various volunteer leadership positions for her local chapter of Team Red, White
& Blue, a national nonprofit Veteran Support Organization, whose mission is to enrich the lives of America’s
Veterans by improving their physical and mental wellness.
3
Jeanette McMahon retired in 2009 as a U.S. Army
colonel who served 27 years. A West Point graduate of
the Class of 1983, she also earned a Master of Science
Degree in Operations Research and has worked in
various positions in that field for over a decade. She
was selected to stand up West Point’s first Sexual
Assault and Prevention Office, which she managed
from 2005-2009. She has maintained a relationship
with that office, attending its annual conference, and
providing guidance to successive program managers.
She currently teaches and coaches championship
teams at the high school level.
Michelle Olson is a former U.S. Army captain and
West Point graduate. She has worked in various leadership and project management roles for American
Standard, General Electric, Amazon, and Stanford
Health Care.
4
INTRODUCTION AND
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT
Petitioner persuasively argues that this case presents an ideal opportunity to clarify the bounds of the
Feres Doctrine. Amici support that position and wish
to further explain the ongoing crisis of sexual violence
at the nation’s military service academies. As graduates of those institutions, amici have unique insight
into the culture that has allowed sexual harassment
and assault to run rampant on campus, the lasting
harms it inflicts on students long after they leave or
graduate, and the urgent need to allow those like petitioner to seek relief in court.
Women enrolled in U.S. service academies are subjected to pervasive sexual violence. One in six is sexually assaulted each year. Half are sexually harassed.
But few feel comfortable filing complaints. For good
reason: despite efforts at reform, school leaders have
failed these women at nearly every turn. Some faculty
openly tolerate misogyny. Female students are told
that aggressive sexual advances are inevitable, and
that avoiding rape is their responsibility. Sexual violence is treated like a joke, the subject of marching
songs. Meanwhile, women are advised that reporting
sexual assault—or even seeking counseling for sexual
assault—will ruin their careers. Victims often do not
receive appropriate treatment or counseling. And
when they file formal complaints, victims face the prospect of being hounded out of the academy by fellow
students. Many women leave military service soon
after being assaulted.
5
Jane Doe is a victim of this broken system. She
was raped by a fellow student, after hours, during recreational activity. She did not receive appropriate
treatment. And while her assailant faced no consequences, Doe resigned, forfeiting her hard-won educational opportunities. West Point is a college that, like
any other, is obligated to protect its students. Doe’s
injuries—and the systematic culture of sexual violence
that permitted them to occur—should not be beyond
legal remedy. The petition should be granted.
ARGUMENT
PROPER APPLICATION OF THE FERES DOCTRINE TO SEXUAL ASSAULT IS A MATTER OF
PRESSING NATIONAL IMPORTANCE
A. There Is An Unchecked Epidemic Of Sexual
Assault And Sexual Harassment At U.S. Service Academies
Data from the Department of Defense show an
entrenched pattern of sexual violence against women
at the United States Military, Naval, and Air Force
academies. The figures are stark. About one in six
enrolled women indicated they were sexually assaulted during the 2017-2018 academic term. Dep’t of
Def., Annual Report on Sexual Harassment and Violence at the Military Service Academies, Academic Program Year 2017-2018 18 (2019).2 These numbers have
only worsened: the number of all sexual assaults has
surged by nearly 50 percent in recent years—from
https://evawintl.org/wp-content/uploads/APY17-18_MSA_
Report_FINAL.pdf.
2
6
about 507 assaults in the 2015-2016 academic year
to about 747 during the 2017-2018 academic year.3
Despite those figures, which are based on Defense
Department anonymous surveys, the academies combined received just over 100 reports of such incidents
annually during that period. Id. at 25. And while the
Defense Department only publishes prevalence numbers every other year, there are strong indications that
the incidence of sexual assault has continued to climb:
reported sexual assaults, which comprise only a fraction
of all assaults, rose by a third during the 2018-2019
term. Dep’t of Def., Annual Report on Sexual Harassment and Violence at the Military Service Academies,
Academic Program Year 2018-2019 5 (2020).4
Outright assault is not the only form of sexual
aggression. Sexual harassment is commonplace and
even less frequently reported at the service academies.
Amici can attest that almost every woman is harassed
during her four years at an academy. Official records
bear that out. Among those anonymously surveyed,
half of all women enrolled in the service academies
experienced sexual harassment just during the
2017-2018 academic year. Dep’t of Def. 2017-2018
Report, supra, at 22 (2019). But despite the staggering
prevalence of harassment across all three schools, not
While sexual assault is far less prevalent among men
enrolled in service academies, they have also experienced an
increase in incidents: 3.4 percent of anonymously surveyed male
students experienced sexual assault in 2017-2018, up from 1.4
percent in 2015-2016. Ibid.
4
https://www.sapr.mil/sites/default/files/_DoD_Annual_
Report_on_Sexual_Harassment_and_Violence_APY18-19.pdf.
3
7
one student felt comfortable filing a formal complaint
during the 2017-2018 term. Id. at 5. And informal
complaints of sexual harassment actually dropped
from sixteen complaints in 2016-2017 to just seven in
2017-2018. Ibid.
Victims’ reticence to report reflects an absence of
accountability. Stories of severe harassment frequently appear in the news. Male students have
groped female students and shared sexually explicit
emails referencing them, while school administrators
have done little to punish this inappropriate behavior.
See Dep’t of Def., Annual Report on Sexual Harassment
and Violence at the Military Service Academies Academic Program Year 2012-2013 45, 58 (2014);5 see also
Craig Whitlock, McMaster Rebuked by Army in 2015
for His Handling of Sexual Assault Case, WASH. POST
(Mar. 2, 2017).6
Inadequately deterred, these problems have long
persisted. Women enrolled in service academies have
been subjected to misogynistic degradation and sexual
assault since those institutions first began admitting
women in 1976. See Esther B. Fein, The Choice, N.Y.
TIMES MAG. (May 5, 1985);7 Grace Lichtenstein, A Year
https://www.sapr.mil/public/docs/reports/FINAL_APY_1213_MSA_Report.pdf.
6
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/mcmasterrebuked-by-army-in-2015-for-his-handling-of-sexual-assault-case/
2017/03/02/e8421a8e-fe8b-11e6-8ebe-6e0dbe4f2bca_story.html.
7
https://www.nytimes.com/1985/05/05/magazine/the-choice.
html.
5
8
Later, N.Y. TIMES (Sept. 11, 1977);8 Elizabeth Aguilera
et al., Roots of Sexual-Abuse Problem at Air Force
Academy Run Deep, DENVER POST, Aug. 17, 2003. Amici,
who all graduated from service academies, have witnessed much of this behavior firsthand.
Similar problems await those women who graduate from service academies under these conditions.
Overall, one in three women in service have experienced military sexual trauma. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, Military Sexual Trauma General Fact Sheet 1
(2020).9 About 6.2 percent of active-duty women in the
U.S. military were sexually assaulted in the year leading up to a 2019 Defense Department study, up from
4.3 percent of women surveyed in 2016. Dep’t of Def.,
Annual Report on Sexual Assault in the Military Fiscal
Year 2018 3 (2019).10 And 40 percent of women who
report sexual assault are separated from service soon
after, many within a year of being attacked. Inspector
General, Dep’t of Def., Evaluation of the Separation of
Service Members Who Made a Report of Sexual Assault
4, 36-38 (2016).11
Meanwhile, the military has failed to adequately
investigate and prosecute assailants among its ranks.
https://www.nytimes.com/1977/09/11/archives/a-year-laterhow-women-are-faring-at-the-air-academy.html.
9
https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/mst_general_fact
sheet.pdf.
10
https://www.sapr.mil/sites/default/files/DoD_Annual_Report_
on_Sexual_Assault_in_the_Military.pdf.
11
https://media.defense.gov/2016/May/09/2001714241/-1/-1/1/
DODIG-2016-088.pdf.
8
9
Of 1,904 cases of alleged penetrative sexual assault by
active duty service members reviewed in a recent
Defense Department report, more than 70 percent
resulted in no administrative, nonjudicial, or judicial
action against the accused. Defense Advisory Committee, Report On Investigative Case File Reviews For Military Adult Penetrative Sexual Offense Cases Closed
In Fiscal Year 2017 11 (2020).12 And even among those
235 cases that went to trial, most (144) ended in
acquittal. Ibid. In one recent case, a West Point cadet
sentenced to 21 years in prison for raping a fellow student in her sleeping bag had his conviction overturned
because the victim did not scream to alert nearby
cadets to the assault. Derrick Bryson Taylor, West
Point Cadet’s Rape Conviction Is Overturned, Drawing
Criticism, N.Y. TIMES (June 9, 2019).13 The accused
returned to West Point. Ibid.
B. Service Academies Have Fostered An Environment That Tolerates And Sometimes Encourages Sexual Violence Against Women
Rampant sexual assault and harassment at the
service academies is no accident. It is the product of a
toxic culture of misogyny, permitted and sometimes
even encouraged by school administrators and faculty,
and in violation of Defense Department policies. By
the Defense Department’s own account, some leaders
have “endors[ed] toxic behaviors” and display “apath[y]
https://dacipad.whs.mil/images/Public/08-Reports/08_
DACIPAD_CaseReview_Report_20201019_Final_Web.pdf.
13
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/09/nyregion/west-pointcadet-rape-case.html.
12
10
to sexual assault and harassment.” Dep’t of Def.
2018-2019 Report, supra, at 5 (2020). Those attitudes
have created a “stereotypical male culture” characterized by an “inability or unwillingness to recognize disrespectful experiences as ‘unacceptable,’ ” where “sexually
harassing behaviors are perceived as lacking severity
or seen as ‘normal,’ ” and where students are deterred
“from seeking assistance, reporting, or intervening
with sexual harassment.” Ibid. Likewise, “[p]erceived
stigma about sexual assault reporting” deters students
from seeking help from academy staff. Id. at 7.
Despite some recent efforts at reform, the Defense
Department has “found little evidence of change in
long-standing attitudes that deter reporting and helpseeking,” and students continue to fear “that reporting
will negatively impact their academic and military
careers.” Id. at 6. The Defense Department’s Office of
Inspector General has repeatedly found that service
academies have failed to follow appropriate practices
relating to sexual assault, including lacking procedures to document informal reports of sexual assault
or referrals to victim support services, and failing to
report incidents of sexual assault to Congress as
required by law. Evaluation of the Department of
Defense’s Handling of Incidents of Sexual Assault
Against (or Involving) Cadets at the United States
Military Academy (March 24, 2020);14 Evaluation of the
DoD’s Handling of Incidents of Sexual Assault Against
https://media.defense.gov/2020/Mar/26/2002270146/-1/-1/1/
DODIG-2020-073.pdf.
14
11
(or Involving) Cadets at the United States Air Force
Academy (Sept. 30, 2019).15
Petitioner’s experience at West Point was the
direct result of these failings. Male cadets felt empowered to be sexually aggressive toward women because
West Point faculty and administrators ignored abusive
behavior and discussed sex in ways that degraded
women. School “faculty openly joked with male cadets
about having sex with female cadets, lament[ed] the
lack of ‘sexual opportunities’ at West Point, and
advis[ed] male cadets to ‘seize any chance to have
sex.’ ” Pet. App. 72a. Students marched through campus singing “team building” songs with violent lyrics
that objectified women. Pet. App. 72a-73a. These
songs included lines such as “I wish that all the ladies
were holes in the road/and I was a dump truck/I’d fill
‘em with my load” and “I wish that all the ladies/were
statues of Venus/and I was a sculptor/I’d break ‘em
with my penis.” Ibid.
While male students were allowed or encouraged
to demean women, female students were informally
advised that reporting sexual assault would destroy
their military careers. Pet. App. 73a. They were
“taught that the prevention of sexual assault was ‘a
woman’s responsibility’ and it was the women’s job to
say ‘no’ when faced with inevitable advances from their
male colleagues.” Doe v. Hagenbeck, 98 F. Supp. 3d 672,
https://media.defense.gov/2019/Oct/02/2002189371/-1/-1/1/
DODIG-2019-125.pdf.
15
12
678 (S.D.N.Y. 2015), rev’d in part, 870 F.3d 36 (2d Cir.
2017); Pet. App. 112a.
Formal guidance was not much better. Minimal
sexual assault training offered by West Point put the
onus on women to say “no,” rather than on men to not
rape, because advances from male colleagues were
“inevitable.” Pet. App. 47a. First and second year
cadets received approximately four hours of “Respect
training” per academic year, only a fraction of which
discussed sexual assault. Pet. App. 111a-112a. In
2011, the Defense Department found that West Point
was “not in compliance” with sexual assault training
policies and was employing a “deficient” prevention
program that failed to meet “the Department’s minimum standard.” Annual Report on Sexual Harassment
and Violence at the Military Service Academies Academic Program Year 2010–2011 at 24, 28 (2011).16
West Point continued to fail petitioner after she
was raped and sought medical attention. She feared
that if she named her assailant, fellow students would
retaliate against her and that the school would punish
her without imposing consequences on her attacker.
Pet. App. 22a; 117a. Her fears were well founded. The
school did not provide appropriate medical treatment
or psychological counseling. She received no offer of
support until two weeks after the rape, when she
received a single email from a counselor. Pet. App.
118a. And despite making two visits to a campus
https://sapr.mil/public/docs/reports/FINAL_APY_10-11_
MSA_Report.pdf.
16
13
health clinic, she never received a forensic examination as required by mandatory regulations. Pet. App.
62a; Dep’t of Def., Directive 6495.01: Sexual Assault
Prevention and Response Program 2, 13 (2008). Fearing retaliation and punishment, Doe chose not to name
her rapist, who faced no consequences for his actions.
Pet. App. 76a.
The facts of this case echo the lived experiences of
many women who have attended the service academies both before and after petitioner. Amici can attest
that the entrenched culture of sexual violence is, again,
nothing new. Since women were first admitted to service academies in 1976, school leaders have proved illequipped to investigate and remedy pervasive sexual
harassment and assault. And at times they have
actively fostered the toxic environment that leads to
harassment and assault. Even good-faith efforts at
reform have fallen short.
When West Point cadet Madeline Lewis accused
the school’s star quarterback of raping her in 2014, the
academy treated her like “a vial of poison,” punishing
her when it concluded that the incident was consensual, while providing the accused with mentoring.
James LaPorta, Cadet Run Out of West Point After
Accusing Army’s Star Quarterback of Rape, The Daily
Beast (Dec. 8, 2017).17 Fellow students began calling
Lewis “the whore of the corps” and told Lewis “she
should be ‘taken out back’ and shot ‘like Old Yeller.’ ”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/cadet-run-out-of-west-pointafter-accusing-armys-star-quarterback-of-rape.
17
14
Ibid. The abuse continued even after Lewis complained to school leadership, and like petitioner, she
eventually left West Point. Ibid.
In another disturbing recent incident, a male student at the Naval Academy broke into dormitories on
four separate occasions, sexually assaulting three fellow students. Editorial Board, Charges against midshipmen raise concern about Naval Academy’s
commitment to addressing sexual assault, BALT. SUN
(Nov. 1, 2019).18 Despite the fact that the incidents
occurred over a 15-month period, the school failed to
prevent the repeated attacks. Ibid.
The academies’ failings have inflicted significant
damage on the victims of sexual violence. Many, like
petitioner, have been forced to abandon their career
aspirations after investing the considerable mental,
academic, and physical labor necessary to gain
entrance to a service academy. What is more, many
victims suffer lasting physical, psychological, and
social harm from sexual assault. “Evidence shows
that long-term effects” of sexual victimization “can be
serious and wide ranging, including physical (e.g.,
chronic health problems, pain, obesity), mental (e.g.,
post-traumatic stress, depression), and behavioral
(e.g., substance abuse, eating disorders, employment
difficulties, relationship problems) consequences.”
Valerie A. Stander & Cynthia J. Thomsen, Sexual
https://www.baltimoresun.com/opinion/editorial/bs-ed-1103sexual-assault-naval-academy-20191101-vxalielz4zbxnm7pwvjc
mia3ma-story.html.
18
15
Harassment and Assault in the U.S. Military: A Review
of Policy and Research Trends, 181 Military Medicine
20, 22 (2016) (Supplement 1). For those who manage
to stay in the military despite such experiences, “operational stressors such as combat exposure may further
add to these cumulative effects.” Ibid. Sexual trauma
and abuse is the aspect of military service most likely
to affect women’s mental health. Service Women’s
Action Network, The Mental Wellness Needs of Military
Women: Community Driven Solutions 13 (2018).19 And
female veterans are almost “250 percent more likely
to kill themselves than civilian women.” Jay Price,
Battling Depression And Suicide Among Female Veterans, National Public Radio (May 29, 2018).20
C. The Feres Doctrine Should Not Stand As A
Barrier To Addressing This Vital Issue
In Feres v. United States, this Court held that the
Federal Tort Claims Act did not waive sovereign
immunity for injuries to service members that “arise
out of or are in the course of activity incident to [military] service.” 340 U.S. 135, 146 (1950). As petitioner
ably explains, that reading is contrary to the text of
the statute, lacks a coherent rationale, and has generated inconsistent results in the courts of appeals. But
even putting those points aside, petitioner’s injury is
far afield from “activity incident to service.” She was
raped by a fellow student while engaging in
https://www.servicewomen.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/
02/2018-Annual-Summit-Report-Final.compressed.pdf.
20
https://www.npr.org/2018/05/29/614011243/battlingdepression-and-suicide-among-female-veterans.
19
16
recreational activity unrelated to any school event or
military service. In this respect, petitioner is similarly
situated to thousands of women across the country.
Faced with inadequate protections, indifferent
administrators, unsuccessful criminal prosecutions,
and under-deterrence, victims of sexual assault on college campuses have increasingly turned to civil litigation against the institutions that have failed to protect
them. Much of that litigation falls under Title IX, from
which the service academies are exempt. See Greta
Anderson, More Title IX Lawsuits by Accusers and
Accused, INSIDE HIGHER ED (Oct. 3, 2019);21 20 U.S.C.
§ 1681(a)(4). But victims of campus sexual assault
have also relied on precisely the kind of claims at issue
here: negligence and contract claims against educational institutions that have fostered an environment
of pervasive sexual violence. See Doe 1 v. Baylor Univ.,
240 F. Supp. 3d 646, 653 (W.D. Tex. 2017) (suit by 10
victims of sexual assault at Baylor University alleging
violations of Title IX, state tort law, and state contract
law in perpetuating “a widespread pattern of discriminatory responses to female students’ reports of sexual
assault”); see also Shank v. Carleton Coll., 232 F. Supp.
3d 1100 (D. Minn. 2017) (Title IX, tort, and contract
claims); Ross v. Univ. of Tulsa, 180 F. Supp. 3d 951
(N.D. Okla. 2016) (Title IX and tort claims); Facchetti
v. Bridgewater Coll., 175 F. Supp. 3d 627 (W.D. Va.
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/10/03/studentslook-federal-courts-challenge-title-ix-proceedings.
21
17
2016) (same); Doe v. Emerson Coll., 153 F. Supp. 3d 506
(D. Mass. 2015) (same).
Those suits are necessary to address the epidemic
of campus sexual assault. Indeed, “the most effective
way to stop campus sexual assault is to confront the
reality of its perpetration, identify the cultural components that enable its normalization, and build the
institutional capacity of schools to prevent and address
it.” Diane L. Rosenfeld, Uncomfortable Conversations:
Confronting the Reality of Target Rape on Campus,
128 HARV. L. REV. F. 359, 359 (2015). When educational institutions prove unable or unwilling to do so
by other means, victims have no choice but to seek
redress in court.
U.S. service academies should not be immune from
that reckoning. They are first and foremost institutions
of higher learning. See, e.g., Bruce Keith, The Transformation of West Point as a Liberal Arts College,
96 Liberal Education (Spring 2010) (“West Point is,
first and foremost, a liberal arts college.”).22 They offer
a wide variety of academic majors, from English to
Environmental Science, and the vast majority of their
curricula is unrelated to military matters. U.S. Military Academy at West Point, Academics: Majors and
Minors.23 They often compete with and compare themselves to the Ivy League schools. They participate in a
https://www.aacu.org/publications-research/periodicals/
transformation-west-point-liberal-arts-college.
23
https://www.westpoint.edu/academics/majors-and-minors.
(last visited Nov. 23, 2020).
22
18
broad range of NCAA Division I and Division II sports,
from golf to volleyball. While they of course provide
military training, students effectively do not incur
binding military service obligations until the beginning of their third year. See U.S. Military Academy,
Army Regulation 150–1, United States Military Academy Organization, Administration, and Operation 25
(2019) (waiving service obligations if students withdraw before beginning their third year of academic
classes).24 And even among those who graduate, many
leave the military as soon as their service obligations
expire. See Michael L. Hansen & Shanthi Nataraj,
RAND Arroyo Center, Identifying Civilian Labor Market Realities for Army Officers Making Stay/Leave
Decisions (2012) (noting that only 44 percent of West
Point commissioned officers stay past their required
eight years of service).25
When combined with the exemption from Title IX,
overbroad application of Feres has left students at
these schools without any way to access the same avenues of judicial relief open to their civilian peers.
Women enrolled in U.S. service academies have been
subject to severe sex discrimination. After more than a
decade of attempted self-correction, the problem has
only gotten worse. And the brightest aspiring officers
have been condemned to an impossible choice: endure
years of sexual aggression or abandon their careers.
https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/
ARN5862_AR150-1_FINAL.pdf.
25
https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9653.html.
24
19
This case presents an opportunity to correct that manifest injustice.
CONCLUSION
The petition for a writ of certiorari should be
granted.
Respectfully submitted,
JENNIFER K. BROWN
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
250 W. 55th St.
New York, N.Y. 10019
BRIAN R. MATSUI
Counsel of Record
ADAM L. SORENSEN
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
2000 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, D.C. 20006
(202) 887-8784
BMatsui@mofo.com
Counsel for Amici Curiae
NOVEMBER 30, 2020
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.