Petition for Writ of Certiorari — John L. Williams, Petitioner v. Jackson County, Missouri
Supreme Court briefAug 9, 2019
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
■s
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No: 17-1742
John L. Williams
Plaintiff - Appellant
Edward H. Pennington, Jr.; Anthony L. Nevels
Plaintiffs
v.
Jackie Robinson, JCDC Manager; Ken Conlee, JCDC Director; Gary Morrow, JCDC Mailroom
Supervisor; Baldree, Lieutenant; Bowden, JCDC Mailroom Employee
Defendants
MO Jackson County
Defendant - Appellee
Paul Smith, Sergeant; County Executive Mike Sanders, Jackson County Executive
Defendants
Appeal from U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
(4:13-cv-00866-BCW)
JUDGMENT
Before SHEPHERD, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
This appeal from the United States District Court was submitted on the record of the
district court and briefs of the parties.
After consideration, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the district
court in this cause is affirmed in accordance with the opinion of this Court.
May 14, 2019
Appellate Case: 17-1742
Page: 1
Date Filed: 05/14/2019 Entry ID: 4787239
*
'J
t
;
i
;
©
it'
V,'
Order Entered in Accordance with Opinion:
Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
/s/ Michael E. Gans
i...
Appellate Case; 17-1742
Page: 2
Date Filed: 05/14/2019 Entry ID: 4787239
■*»
-
s i' '
M
s
fs
■f
fji;'-::
"r
*.*
X
}\
?
5;
*
W J
UA
\
'X' y n'ii'1
1. '.Uvlrc- \
£\
i
11
y
H
?..'i
\.
•■o
(
-*
■
i
$
:K ' 1 • •
V
-'.tit.
t
r
*
-V
•• i
If
;.
<■
f
r-
! i.
/
V1
>:
i-;
'r
i.
■i
€?•
Q
*
®ntteb States; Court of Appeals
Jfor tl)t Cigljtl) Circuit
No. 17-1742
John L. Williams
Plaintiff - Appellant
Edward H. Pennington, Jr.; Anthony L. Nevels
Plaintiffs
v.
Jackie Robinson, JCDC Manager; Ken Conlee, JCDC Director; Gary Morrow,
JCDC Mailroom Supervisor; Baldree, Lieutenant; Bowden, JCDC Mailroom Employee
Defendants
MO Jackson County
Defendant - Appellee
Paul Smith, Sergeant; County Executive Mike Sanders, Jackson County Executive
Defendants
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
Submitted: April 12, 2019
Filed: May 14, 2019
[Unpublished]
Appellate Case: 17-1742
Page: 1
Date Filed: 05/14/2019 Entry ID: 4787232
9
*
>
'1 -
r
-4. Ai l'*1"'
;•
*
’
fa •,
•%
V ' 1
' *
T;
;
s.
‘
,.j,
l-V
-5
■
V; .
‘ r
V
‘.i
*
ri
v
y-
;•*
Jl-Jv
i
- :'-‘l"
sm: ! .S>>r..y>
:■
•J
r.-i...
3
t
:-r 3 *
f1.:
h
....
*1
ij
V;
i; ,
V:.
•T
;.
r-r
hi/-
v
V*
: i
r*
■>
■-7
3.
i; ;
-n
1
r
i
••» m:.
•c'
»
L'.
V
i
V ;-
j
* .•
\
r
j
1'!?
!,
:• i
v
£
^4.
»
'i
.?.
•
i
r
rj
<■
r
)•
J r
.
' «•
(
5
f-
.v
i.';ii' i.; ■ }■
1
■\
.«
•
ft
• I
<*
4 •'
V
f.
f-
/
Before SHEPHERD, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
John Williams, an inmate formerly confined in the Jackson County Detention
Center in Kansas City, Missouri, appeals the adverse judgment entered by the district
court1 following a jury trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action challenging the prison’s
mail policy. Having carefully reviewed the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no
basis for reversal. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by
submitting the issues to the jury, see PFS Distrib. Co. v. Raduechel, 574 F.3d 580,
596 (8th Cir. 2009) (jury instructions are reviewed for abuse of discretion);
Henderson v. Terhune, 379 F.3d 709, 712 (9th Cir. 2004) (whether regulation
impermissibly restricts First Amendment rights under Turner v. Saflev, 482 U.S. 78
(1987) is mixed question of law and fact; legitimacy of asserted penological interest
is a finding of fact); or by admitting evidence of Williams’s prior convictions, see
United States v. Has No Horse, 11 F.3d 104, 106 (8th Cir. 1993) (admissibility of
evidence is reviewed for abuse of discretion). We further conclude that Williams
failed to preserve his sufficiency-of-the-evidence argument at trial, see Unitherm
Food Sys. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc., 546 U.S. 394, 400-01 (2006) (in absence of
post-verdict motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b), appellate court lacks power to direct
district court to enter judgment contrary to that permitted to stand); and we reject his
argument that Jackson County presented inconsistent arguments about its mail policy.
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and the pending motion
is denied.
'The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
-2-
Appellate Case: 17-1742
Page: 2
Date Filed: 05/14/2019 Entry ID: 4787232
e)
:
;
'S
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
„ WESTERN DIVISION
JOHN L. WILLIAMS,
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
) Case No. 13-000866-CV-W-BCW
)
)
)
)
)
)
JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI,
Defendant.
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
X
Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that JUDGMENT is entered in accordance with the
jury verdict (Doc. #170) filed March 22, 2017.
AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COURT
March 23. 2017
Dated
/s/Paige Wvmore-Wvnn
Court Executive
March 22. 2017
Entered
By: Joella Baldwin
Deputy Clerk
Case 4:13-cv-00866-BCW Document 171 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 1
Ch
VERDICT FORM
Note:
Complete this form by writing in the names required by your
verdict.
On Plaintiff John Williams’ claim against Defendant Jackson
County,
Missouri, as submitted in Instruction 14, we find in favor of:
(Plaintiff John Williams)
or
(Defendant Jackson County, Missouri)
On Plaintiff John Williams’ claim against Defendant Jackson County,
Missouri, as submitted in Instruction 15, we find in favor of:
0 ? "Cf /"A
(Plaintiff John Williams)
Note:
or
J
(^6
___ y
(Defendant Jackson County, Missouri)
Complete the following paragraphs only if either of the above
findings is in favor of the Plaintiff.
We find Plaintiff John Williams’ damages to be:
$
.(state the nominal amount of $1.00).
I
i
i
i
)
ForejDer8t5n
Dated:
n
Case 4:13-cv-00866-BCW Document 170 Filed 03/22/17 Page 1 of 1
i
!
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.