Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Linh Thi Minh Tran, Petitioner v. Stan the Hot Water Man
Supreme Court briefJul 16, 2019
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
No.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
LINH THI MINH TRAN
Petitioner on Writ of Certiorari,
Vs.
STAN THE HOT WATER MAN
Petitioner on Writ of Certiorari,
PETITIONER ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI LINH THI MINH TRAN’S
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI OF OREGON SUPREME COURT’S
DECISION ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION WAS ENTERED ON
04/18/2019 BY MARTHA L. WALTERS, CHIEF JUSTICE OREGON
SUPREME COURT.
/
PETITIONER ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI LINH THI MINH TRAN'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI OF
OREGON SUPREME COURT'S ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION WAS ENTERED ON 04/18/2019.
Oregon Supreme Court Case: S066380, Oregon Court of Appeals Case: A165790, Multnomah County
Circuit Court Case: 16CV19058| Linh Thi Minh Tran, Petitioner on writ of certiorari, 12542 SE Capella
court, Happy Valley, Oregon 970861 Tel: 503-558-08861 Email: minhlinhtrn@gmail.com | Page 39 of 40
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, Linh Thi Minh Tran, Petitioner on writ of certiorari, declares that on 07/16/2019, as
required by Supreme Court of the United Stated Rule 291 have served the enclosed MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND PETITION FOR A WRIT OF
CERTIORARI in the Case Name: Linh Thi Minh Tran vs. Stan The Hot Water Man. Oregon
Supreme Court Case Number: S066368, Oregon Court of Appeals Case Number: A165790,
Multnomah County Circuit Court Case Number: 16CV19058 on each party to the above-named
case proceeding or that party’s counsel, and on every other person required to be served, by
depositing an envelope containing the above documents in the United Stated mail properly
addressed to each of them with tracking number prepaid commercial carrier for delivery.
The names and addresses of those served are as follows:
Buckley Law, P.C.
Marjorie A. Elken OSB No. 073368
5300 Meadows Road, Ste. 200
Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035
Telephone: 503-620-8900
Email: mae@buckley-law.com
Attorney for Respondent on writ of certiorari Stan the Hot Water Man
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct
Executed on 07/16/2019
/ /. .j/t.j.
t
Linh Thi Minh Tran
Petitioner on writ of certiorari pro se
12542 SE Capella court
Happy Valley, Oregon 97086
Tel: 503-558-0886
Email: minhlinhtm@.gmail .com
PETITIONER ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI LINH THI MINH TRAN'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI OF
OREGON SUPREME COURT'S ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION WAS ENTERED ON 04/18/2019.
Oregon Supreme Court Case: S066380, Oregon Court of Appeals Case: A165790, Multnomah County
Circuit Court Case: 16CV19058| Linh Thi Minh Tran, Petitioner on writ of certiorari, 12542 SE Capella
court, Happy Valley, Oregon 970861 Tel: 503-558-0886 (Email: minhlinhtrn@gmail.com | Page 40 of 40
rv
*MH£E£RIPREME COURT OF THE
STATE OF OREGON
LINH THJ MINH TRAN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Petitioner on Review
v.
STAN THE HOT WATER MAN,
Defendant-Respondent,
Respondent on Review.
Court of Appeals
A165790
S066380
Upon consideration by the court.
ed. The court has
c: Marjorie A Elken
Linh Thi Tran
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON
LINH THI MINH TRAN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Petitioner on Review,
v.
STAN THE HOT WATER MAN,
Defendant-Respondent,
Respondent on Review.
Court of Appeals
A165790
S066380
ORDER DENYING REVIEW
Upon consideration by the court.
The court has considered the petition for review and orders that it be denied.
MARTHA L WALTERS
CHIEF JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT
2/22/2019 8:55 AM
c: Marjorie A Elken
Linh Thi Tran
jr
ORDER DENYING REVIEW
REPLIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO: State Court Administrator, Records Section,
Supreme Court Building, 1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563
Page 1 of 1
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
LINH THI MINH TRAN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STAN THE HOT WATER MAN,
Defendant-Respondent
Multnomah County Circuit Court No. 16CV19058
Court of Appeals No. A165790
ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION
Appellant petitions for reconsideration of the court’s decision dated October 10,
2018, pursuant to ORAP 6.25. The court has considered the petition and orders that
the petition is denied.
The petition for reconsideration is denied.
i
REX ARMSTRONG
TOESIDING JUDGE, COURT OF APPEALS
H/14/2018 9:09 AM
c: Linh Thi Tran
Marjorie A Elken
ei
ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION
REPLIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO: State Court Administrator, Records Section,
Supreme Court Building, 1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563
Page 1 of 1
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
LINH THI MINH TRAN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STAN THE HOT WATER MAN,
Defendant-Respondent.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
16CV19058
A165790
APPELLATE JUDGMENT and SUPPLEMENTAL JUDGMENT
James D Huegli, Judge pro tempore.
Submitted on September 07, 2018.
Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge; Tookey, Judge; and Shorr, Judge.
Attorney for Appellant: Linh Thi Minh Tran, pro se.
Attorney for Respondent: Marjorie A. Elken.
AFFIRMED WITHOUT OPINION
DESIGNATION OF PREVAILING PARTY AND AWARD OF COSTS
Prevailing party:
Respondent
[X] Costs allowed, payable by Appellant.
APPELLATE JUDGMENT and SUPPLEMENTAL JUDGMENT
REPLIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO: State Court Administrator, Records Section
Supreme Court Building, 1163 State St, Salem OR 97301-2563
Page 1 of 2
MONEY AWARD
Attorney:
Stan the Hot Water Man
Marjorie A. Elken, 5300 Meadows Rd Ste 200, Lake Oswego OR 97035
Debtor:
Linh Thi Minh Tran, pro se
Creditor:
Attorney Fees:
Costs:
$10,246.50
$473.00
'
$10,719.50
Total Amount:
Interest: Simple, 9% per annum, from the date of this appellate judgment.
Appellate Judgment
Effective Date: July 15, 2019
Court of Appeals
(seal)
els
APPELLATE JUDGMENT and SUPPLEMENTAL JUDGMENT_________ ________ ___
REPLIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO: State Court Administrator, Records Section,
Supreme Court Building, 1163 State St, Salem OR 97301-2563
Page 2 of 2
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
LINH THI MINH TRAN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STAN THE HOT WATER MAN,
Defendant-Respondent.
Multnomah County Circuit Court No. 16CV19058
Court of Appeals No. A165790
ORDER STRIKING EXCERPT OF RECORD
Appellant has tendered for filing a brief containing a voluminous excerpt of record
that includes parts of the transcript, photographs, copies of motions and memoranda,
and one or more compact discs. ORAP 5.50(6) in material part provides:
****
If a self-represented party files an excerpt of record * * * it must
contain only those documents specified in ORAP 5.50(2)(a) and (b), must
contain no other documents, and must otherwise comply with this rule.4
Footnote 4 states:
Under ORAP 6.05(2), cases in which a self-represented party files a
brief are submitted without oral argument by any party. For that reason,
any excerpt of record * * * submitted by a self-represented party shall not
contain any of the documents otherwise required by ORAP 5.50(2)(c) to
. (f) to assist the appellate court in preparing for oral argument.
The court on its own motion strikes appellant’s excerpt on the ground that it does
not comply with ORAP 5.50(6). Appellant shall have 14 days from the date of this order
to file an amended excerpt of record containing only the judgment or order on appeal
and any written or oral rulings by the trial court addressing the issues presented by the
assignment of error, as provided in ORAP 5.50(2)(a) and (b).
The court directs the Appellate Court Administrator to return to appellant the
materials making up the excerpt of record part of appellant’s brief filed on April 14,
L>, TZ&4JL
JAMES W. NASS
APPELLATE COMMISSIONER
5/3/2018 10:44 AM
c: Linh Thi Tran
Marjorie A Elken
km
ORDER STRIKING EXCERPT OF RECORD
REPLIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO: State Court Administrator, Records Section,
Supreme Court Building, 1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563
Page 1 of 1
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
LINH THIMINH TRAN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STAN THE HOT WATER MAN,
Defendant-Respondent.
i
Multnomah County Circuit Court
16CV19058
A165790
ORDER ALLOWING ATTORNEY FEES IN PART
Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge.
*
In this tort action assigning error to the trial court's grant of respondent’s motion
for summary judgment, respondent, who prevailed on review, seeks attorney fees in the
amount of $17,670. Respondent relies on ORS 20.105 and requests findings under
ORAP 13.10(7). Appellant objects. For the reasons explained below, we allow attorney
fees in the amount of $10,246.50.
Under ORS 20.105(1), in determining whether a party had an objectively
reasonable basis for asserting a particular claim, the primary issue is whether there is
evidence in the record to support the claim - that is, whether the party’s claim is
“entirely devoid of legal or factual support at the time it was made” or, “in light of
additional evidence or changes in the law, as litigation proceeds.” Williams v Salem
Women's Clinic, 245 Or App 476,482,263 P3d 1072 (2011); Lena v. Bottem, 221 Or
. App 241,248,190 P3d 399, rev den, 345 Or 503 (2008). to facilitate adequate,
meaningful review, a "court must enter findings when it either grants or denies a motion
forattomey fees under ORS 20.105." Statenv. Steel, 22 Or Aop 17 42 191 P3d778
(2008), rev den, 345 Or 61£ (2009).
'
...
Here, respondent argues that an award i> proper pursuant to ORS 20.105(1) on
the grounds that respondent is the prevailing party, there is no objectively reasonable
basis fbr appellant’s claims on appeal, and appellant acted in bad faith. Appellant
objects and contends that her appeal was objectively reasonable. She does this by
listing the individual reasons why her complaints were justified. We agree with
respondent and find that appellant’s objections are not well-founded given the totality of
the facts and claims on appeal. Therefore, we award fees to respondent
ORDER ALLOWING ATTORNEY FEES UN PART
REPLIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO: Slate Court Administrator. Records Section.
Supreme Court Building, 1163 Stale Street. Salem. OR 97301-2563
Page 1 of 2
PLAINTIFF-APPELANT LINH THI MINH TRAN'S PETITION FOR REVIEW TO OREGON SUPREME COURT
of order denying reconsideration was issued on 01/11/2019 from Oregon court of
appeal , Robyn Ridler Aoyagi, Judge Court of Appeals.
Linh Thi Minh Tran, Plaintiff-Appellant pro se, 12542 SE Capella court, Happy Valley, Oregon 97086.
Email: minhlinhtrn@gmail.com I Page 15 of 19
We have considered the factors set out in 20.075(1} and (2) to determine the
amount of the fee award. The amount requested award is unreasonably high,
particularly given the time and labor required, the nature of the issues, and the results
obtained in this appeal. ORS '20.075(2){a), (d). Accordingly, we award fees in the
amount of $10,246.50.
Respondent is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $10,246.50.
i
I
BRONSON D. JAMte
JUDGE, COURT OF APPEALS
12/17/2018 8:13 AM
c: Linh Thi Tran
Marjorie A Elken
bl
/
*
V
ORDER ALLOWING ATTORNEY FEES IN PART
REPLIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO: State Court Administrator. Records Section,
Supreme.Court Building. 1163 State Street. Salenx OR 97301-2563
Page 2 of2
PLAINTIFF-APPELANT LINH THI MINH TRAN'S PETITION FOR REVIEW TO OREGON SUPREME COURT
of order denying reconsideration was issued on 01/11/2019 from Oregon court of
appeal , Robyn Ridler Aoyagi, Judge Court of Appeals.
Linh Thi Minh Tran, Plaintiff-Appellant pro se, 12542 SE Capella court, Happy Valley, Oregon 97086.
Email: minhlinhtrn(5)gmail.com I Page 16 of 19
k'
1
2
%
c
§
s
2
*c>.
i 3
1
c 4
I: 5
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON
1 6
FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH
d
'o
49
if'
S'
a
3
s
>
7
LINH THI MINH TRAN,
8
9
t
Plaintiff,
v.
10
11
12
STAN THE HOT WATER MAN,
Defendant.”
) Case No.: 16CV19058
)
) GENERAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
) OF PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS
)
)
)
)
)
13
14
15
16
On August 3, 2017, the Court entered an Order granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment and dismissing all of Plaintiffs claims.
On August 28, 2017, the Court entered a Judgment - Limited Dismissal in the court register
17 which dismissed, without prejudice and without an award of any fees, costs or disbursement to any
18 party, Defendant’s counterclaims.
19
Based on the foregoing, IT IS ADJUDGED that Defendant have judgment on all of Plaintiffs
20 claims against Defendant, and that Defendant is awarded its costs and disbursements in an amount to
21 be determined by supplemental judgment in accordance with ORCP 68.
22
t
23
24
Submitted by:
25 Bv: /s/ Mariorie A. Elken________
Maijorie A. Elken, OSB No.: 073368
26 Attorneyfor Defendants
n
I/'17-/7
Page 1 - GENERAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS
Buckley Law, P.C
5300 Meadows Road. Ste 200
Lake Oswego. OR 97035
. Tel: 503-620-8900Fax: 503*620.48?$
CERTIFICATE OF READINESS
k'
5
g 2
c
i:
p
§:
5J
C
UTCR 5.100(1)
1 hereby certify that on November 17,2017,1 served the foregoing GENERAL JUDGMENT
OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS AND MONEY AWARD on the following
I 6 individual by First Class Mail and email as indicated below:
o
-8 7
s
> 8
Linh Thi Minh Tran
12542 S.E. Capella Court
Happy Valley, Oregon 97086
Email: minhlinhlrn(a)zmail.com
Phone: 503-558-0886
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
PlaintiffPro Se
The PLEADING is ready for judicial signature because:
1.
{" ]
Each opposing party affected by this order or judgment has stipulated to the
order or judgment, as shown by each opposing party’s signature on the document being submitted.
2.
[ ]
Each opposing party affected by this order or judgment has approved the order
or judgment as shown by signature on the document being submitted or by written confirmation of
approval sent to me.
3.
[ X ] On November 17, 2017,1 have served a copy of this order or judgment on all
parties entitled to service and:
a. [ ] No objection has been served on me.
b. [ ] I received objections that 1 could not resolve with the opposing party despite
reasonable efforts to ho so., 1 have filed a copy of the objections I received and indicated
which objections remain unresolved.
/•
c. [ X ] After conferring about objections, PlaintiffPro Se Linh Thi Minh Tran objects
to the form ofjudgment and has submitted her own proposed form ofjudgment.
26
Page 1 - CERTIFICATE OF READINESS
Buckley Law, P.C.
5300 Meadows Road. Ste. 200
Lake Oswego. OR 97035
Tel: 503-620-8900 Fax: 503-620-4878
1
4.
[ ]
The relief sought is against an opposing party who has been found in default.
I 2
'5.
[ ]
An order of default is being requested with this proposed judgment.
I 3
6.
t ]
Service is not required pursuant to subsection (3) of this rule, or by statute,
s'
2
'
P ^ rule, or otherwise.
&a s
7.
[ ]
This is a proposed judgment that includes an award of punitive damages and
o
s'
H
1
2
7 subsection (4) of this rule.
g 6
notice has been served on the Director of the Crime Victims’ Assistance section as required by
DATED this 17th day of November, 2017.
8
9 BUCKLEY LAW P.C.
10
11
12
13
14
By:
/s/ Marjorie A. Elken_______ __
Marjorie A. Elken, OSB No. 073368
5300 Meadows Road, Suite 200
Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035
Phone: 503-620-8900
Email: mae@buckley-law.com
15
16
Attorneyfor Defendants
17
18
19
20
21
22
t
.ft
23
24
25
26
Page 2 - CERTIFICATE OF READINESS
Buckley Law, P.C
5300 Meadows Hoad, Sle. 200
Lake Oswego. OP 97035
Tel: 503-620-8900 Fax: 503-620-4878
k'
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
§ 2
I hereby certify that I served this GENERAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL OF
c;
f 3 PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS certified by me as such, on the following person by mailing, with postage
6 4
'o
paid, and deposited in the post office, addressed to said persons, with a courtesy copy by email, as
S 5 follows:
5
6
y
,1 7
1
9
Linh Thi Minh Tran
12542 S.E. Capella Court
Happy Valley, Oregon 97086
Email: minhlinhlrn(a)email. com
Phone Se: 503-558-0886
10
Plaintiff Pro Se
11
12
DATED this 17th day of November, 2017.
13
14
BUCKLEY LAW, P.C.
15
16
By:
Is/ Marjorie A. Elken_____________
Marjorie A. Elken, OSB No. 073368
mae@buckley-law.com
Samuel V. Rayburn, OSB No. 144115
svr@buckley-law.com
5300 Meadows Rd., Suite 200
Lake Oswego, OR 97035
Tel: (503) 620-8200/Fax: (503) 620-4878
Of Attorneys for Defendant
17
18
19
20
21
f
22
r-
23
24
25
26
Page 1 - CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Buckley Law, P.C.
5300 Meadows Road, Sle. 200
Lake Oswego, OR 97015
Tel: 503-620-8900 Fax• 503-620-4878
\
Additional material
from this filing is
available in the
Clerk's Office.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.