Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Darlene Schmidt, Petitioner v. Gary R. Herbert, Governor of Utah
Supreme Court briefSep 14, 2019
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
>s
No.
<i
i
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
i
!
V
e. g5e?L> tvD d ^
PETITION er
(Your Name)
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
SUPREME COURT. U.S.
VS.
G'&n/
[4^Aoev4~
FILED
SEP I h 2019
— RESPONDENT(S)
ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO
PivYc Uu ~1-
Cptor lr
^
eJ3—
fs
(NAME OF COURT THAT LAST RULED ON MERITS OF YOUR CASE)
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
(Your Name)
/iso
(Wk- \jjQA
(Address)
UT
5
(City, State, Zip Code)
c>
(Phone Number)
$409 3
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
1.Does appeals court’s dismissal finding 2 reliefs but no known cause show
the appeals court is misrepresenting the facts?
2.Did the appeals court establish jurisdiction over the subject matter when
claiming my complaint accurately makes “two vague requests for relief’
but fails to reference its following cause [“who then determines the owner’s
life style, pursuit ofhappiness, desired health status, elimination ofpain
and suffering, service safety, reasonable costs, contracting according to the
desires of the person ofinterest identified or (on) the property ownership
conveyance instrument1?
3.Do the 151 complaint words, show the appeals court failed to establish
jurisdiction over me by their bias and intent to refuse to search for any
cause of action?
4.Did the appeals court establish jurisdiction over corporate VP Herbert,
appellee, impersonating a state governor?
5.Did the replacement appeals judges have jurisdiction to strike the
original assigned judges’ order that I may argue my motion giving appellee
standing at the appeals level and without any opposition?
6.Did the replacement appeals judges have jurisdiction to strike the
original assigned judges’ order that I may argue my motion that judges
recuse who have ruled upon Utah’s Amendment 3 establishing a marriage
between a man and a woman, our equity court’s common law in Art 3.2?
7.Does the replacement appeals judge’s dismissal show failure to read my
briefs or become knowledgeable of the facts before adjudicating?
8.Did the replacement appeals judges copy district court’s adjudication
without reading any documents prior to ruling to follow the district
brethren, i.e., every priesthood leader is an island and no island interferes
with the law of another island?
9.Does the replacement appeals judges order come directly from district
court’s order instead of the briefs submitted at the appeals level?
10.Did district court’s order calling my complaint and motions a brief, as
done at the appeals level, trigger appeals shadow members to act as the
supreme court instead of an appeals court to deter appealing to the real
supreme court?
1 l.Does the district court’s dismissal show a predetermined decision had
been rendered instead of adjudication upon the subject matter when my
motions were mooted to not have to be read?
f
12. Does our ratified constitution reference her republic form of
government as a corporation?
13. Did Dartmouth v Woodward authorize application of “corporation” to
government?
14. Does the existence of a CORPORATE seat of government, Act of 1871,
instead of a republic form of government seat, show 2 governments, 2
constitutions, and 2 presidents govern America, where the shadow
government is calling more shots than the republic government?
15. Did the Act of 1871’s corporate seat of government recognize and
accommodate a foreign government operating upon American soil without
jurisdiction to do so making the corporate seat repugnant to the
constitution?
16. Did Amendment 17 inform states that “ratification is state consent to
give up her senate suffrage?”
17. Did A. 17 conquer all 50 states in 1913 by causing states to believe they
no longer have their senate suffrage given to a 2nd senate house elected by
the people?
18. Has there been any reference to- “We the people of the united
congress”?
19. Is A. 17 repugnant to our constitution?
20. Does the word “and” in the preamble’s secured blessings of liberty
inseparably connect the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity
so that what is done to one is automatically done to the other?
21. Does Roe V Wade contain a blanket presidential pardon to murder and
go unpunished?
22. Did Roe V Wade come from a different constitution instead of our
ratified US constitution?
23. Did the Roe court establish jurisdiction over the subject matter and
both parties prior to ruling?
24. Does Roe show a shadow corporate government’s is operating inside our
republic form of government whose priesthood revelation constitution
governs America?
25. Do the original assigned appeals judge’s recusal show a fight over
which government would rule upon my action which the shadow Corporate
Government judges won?
26. Does the explanation in the dismissal of my July 24, 2019 action show
the recusing appeals judges gave allegiance to the shadow corporate
'
1 f
ui>
government operating inside our republic government to allow braver
shadow judges to determine their own guilt?
27. Did the appeals shadow judges prevented exposure of their conquered
house, senate, and federal government when they dismissed my complaint
after appellee’s brief admitted guilt, page 10 line 16?
28. Did the shadow judges maintained their shadow government operating
within our republic government?
29. Did the shadow judges used their delusional revelation constitution
instead of our ratified constitution?
30. Did the shadow judges rejected reality to claim my complaint failed to
give a cause of action?
31. Did the shadow judges’ predetermined decision occur in a conquered
republic appeals court who was appointed and took an oath to the republic
who built the courthouse and pays their wages, instead of the shadow
government?
32. Does the use of republic buildings, employees and so forth show the
shadow government has agreed to submit to our constitution, supreme law
and republic form of government or they would have announced their
conquer of America?
33. Is protest in opposition to our ratified constitution, freedom of speech or
treason?
34. Does our Art 3.2 equity court and A. 7 common law court come from
British common law that referenced the Books of Moses?
35. Did Moses define marriage between a man & woman in Genesis 2:24
Therefore shall a map leave his lather and his mother, and shall cleave
wnte his wife1 and they shall be one flesh?
36. Is gay marriage forbidden by our constitution’s equity and A. 7 courts,
but not the shadow government’s revelation constitution?
37. Is socialism a form of slavery and barred by our constitution?
38. Did A. 7 & Art 3.2 common law establish Christianity as our national
religion?
39. Do the foreign god’s operating within our boundaries violate our A. 14’s
citizenship they may not hold public office until 14 generations have
passed and silenced the 14 generations, 400 years later, that scientists
have found all carry around with them demanding their homeland law
replace American supreme law: Exodus 34:16 and when you take some of
their daughters as bridges for your sons, their daughters will prostitute
themselves to their gods and cause your sons to do the same?
( ' ' /
LLI&
LIST OF PARTIES
[ ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page.
[ ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of
all parties to the proceeding in the court whose judgment is the subject of this
petition is as follows:
[< Go (A
be.'rbe'i'f ,
eA AG»
Sfo-Ve.
ikil
BuAchp £m33c>
S>16 yX ^ U ^
&dJKYrvlkJr,
/H 60 & 'PlcxVcsU.V
UQ&Q
RELATED CASES
R0^
\]
(jO^Lcl ^
0oos+ iy\oolVK
*4id
v/
us |I3 c 19*1'3
LO00 (A U)0L-rd
i n us (*\ uA e.o
L
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OPINIONS BELOW
1
JURISDICTION
5
CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED
JO
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
.10?
REASONS FOR GRANTING THE WRIT
«2.\
CONCLUSION
INDEX TO APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
c
APPENDIX B
qC^ .
I F>
&T OeWw Dr',e4i
'i VK
\o<xVv orde-r
U)e^\s>
r<2>^Q^ ^
APPENDIX C
APPENDIX D
APPENDIX E
APPENDIX F
f c
f
(
ILUC
33 -5®eJkidriDrt
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below.
OPINIONS BELOW
[ ] For cases from federal courts:
to
The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at Appendix
the petition and is
J or,
[ ] reported at
[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,
^ is unpublished.
to
The opinion of the United States district court appears at Appendix
the petition and is
; or,
[ ] reported at
[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,
[ ] is unpublished.
[ ] For cases from state courts:
The opinion of the highest state court to review the merits appears at
Appendix_____ to the petition and is
; or,
[ ] reported at
[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,
[ ] is unpublished.
The opinion of the_
appears at Appendix
court
to the petition and is
; or,
[ ] reported at____
[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,
[ ] is unpublished.
1.
JURISDICTION
[ ] For cases from federal courts:
The date on which the United States Court of Appeals decided my case
M
A0(9
was
|j£] No petition for rehearing was timely filed in my case. i-£)S
^0\/
(jQOLxbL net cx^r (fe decuStOiA
[ ] A timely petition for rehearing was denied by the United States Court of
, and a copy of the
Appeals on the following date: ____________
order denying rehearing appears at Appendix
[ ] An extension of time to file the petition for a writ of certiorari was granted
(date)
to and including _
(date) on
in Application No.
A
The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U. S. C. § 1254(1).
(s
It'S Go
4 t-SSfteS, ,
[ ] For cases from state courts:
The date on which the highest state court decided my case was
A copy of that decision appears at Appendix_______
[ ] A timely petition for rehearing was thereafter denied on the following date:
______________________, and a copy of the order denying rehearing
appears at Appendix
[ ] An extension of time to file the petition for a writ of certiorari was granted
(date) in
to and including____
(date) on
Application No. ___.A
The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U. S. C. § 1257(a).
)
CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED
Preamble: We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more
perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for
the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the
Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and
establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Art 3.2: (The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity,
arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and
Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; to all Cases
affecting Ambassadors, other pubhc Ministers and Consuls; to all Cases of
admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; to Controversies to which the United
States shall be a Party! to Controversies between two or more States!
between a State and Citizens of another State! between Citizens of
different States! between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under
Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof,
and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.) (This section in parentheses is
modified by the 11th Amendment.)
Amendment 11 - Judicial Limits -- The judicial power of the United States
shall not vbe construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced
or prosecuted against one of the United States by citizens of another state,
or by citizens or subjects of any foreign state.
Note: a Roe judge or lawyer was a citizen/subject of the shadow
government operating inside our republic.
Art 4.2 The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and
Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
Art 4.4 The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a
Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against
Invasion! and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when
the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence
Art 5 - The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it
necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the
Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall
call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall
be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as part of this Constitution, when
ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by
Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of
Ratification may be proposed by the Congress! Provided that no
Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight
hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses
/O,
in the Ninth Section of the first Article! and that no State, without its
Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.
Art 6: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be
made in Pursuance thereof! and all Treaties made, or which shall be
made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law
of the Land! and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any
Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary
notwithstanding. Note; the shadow government’s constitution and law
were barred from producing my dismissal.
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of
the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both
of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or
Affirmation, to support this Constitution! but no religious Test shall ever
be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the
United States. Note•' shadow priesthood revelators cannot be identified
and barred from replacing supreme law with priesthood revelation’s law.
Amendment V Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom
of speech, or of the press! or the right of the people peaceably to assemble,
and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Note: no
religion shall make la w governing congress or citizens.
Amendment 7: In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy
shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved,
and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of
the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Amendment 8: Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines
imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Amendment 13: 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a
punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted,
shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their
jurisdiction.
Amendment 14.1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States,
and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States
and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any
law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States! nor shall any State deprive any person of fife, liberty, or
property, without due process of law! nor deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Note: this naturalized
U.
citizenship is linked to Amendment 5, not our preamble’s secured
blessings of bberty which my citizenship is linked to.
Amendment 5: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or
otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a
Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the
Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall
any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of
life nr limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness
against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due
process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without
just compensation.
Amendment 9: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights,
shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Note: A. 5 already existed. No need to repeat it in 14, unless naturalized
citizenship excludes the blessings ofliberty to run for office, hold
government employment, protest blessings ofliberty, and other.
Naturalized citizens have 14 generations in their genes causing this
citizen to demand his homeland government replace our republic.
/a,
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CITED
PAGE NUMBER
CASES
ROE V WADE, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)
*no case has reviewed Roe pursuant to our preamble’s secured blessings of
liberty, original citizenship compared to A. 14’s citizenship bnked to Art. 5
blessings, not our blessings of liberty; jurisdiction over the subject matter
and over a lawyer representing a ghost or who wrote the Texas penal code
or how the code enforcer is liable for the penal code. No one has addressed
the missing title of murder nobility to go unpunished or the missing
blanket presidential pardon for murder. No one has addressed the Texas
penal code’s submission to our constitution’s secured blessings of liberty or
Blackmun seeking council from Sally, her sister and mom instead of the
constitution or the mental health of Blackmun over Sally’s pregnancy out
of wedlock and the need to punish society for Sally pushing him over the
edge or the reality of the contents of Roe v. Wade or removal from equal
citizen with rights that only can be removed after information,
representation, trial, conviction and sentencing or that the unborn’s
secured blessings of liberty determine the blessings of liberty for
ourselves, the born or who is liable for the issuance of Roe or Roe putting
60,000,000 murderers on death row without their knowledge or the
demands of those on death row to conclude judges or governors
prosecuting abortionists for murder and on and on. I have given these
queries to governors rebelling against Roe or the spread of using Roe to
abort the secured blessings of liberty to ourselves as Herbert, district court
and the appeals court did to me to issue a revelation law I must die. These
issues will likely come before this court or the president or congress or
states or other sooner than wanted.
DARTMOUTH V WOODWARD, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 518 (1819) —......
*no case has reviewed Dartmouth pursuant to having jurisdiction over the
state of New Hampshire, the subject matter, power of attorney for the
king of England, the dates involved or other.
STATUTES AND RULES
Ut Code Ann. 54-3-1: Charges must be just; service adequate! rules
reasonable.
All charges made, demanded or received by any public utility, or by any
two or more public utilities, for any product or commodity furnished or to
be furnished, or for any service rendered or to be rendered, shall be just
and reasonable. Every unjust or unreasonable charge made, demanded or
received for such product or commodity or service is hereby prohibited and
declared unlawful. Every public utility shall furnish, provide and maintain
13,
such service, instrumentalities, equipment and facilities as will promote
the safety, health, comfort and convenience of its patrons, employees and
the public, and as will be in all respects adequate, efficient, just and
reasonable. All rules and regulations made by a public utility affecting or
pertaining to its charges or service to the public shall be just and
reasonable. The scope of definition "just and reasonable" may include, but
shall not be limited to, the cost of providing service to each category of
customer, economic impact of charges on each category of customer, and
on the well-being of the state of Utah; methods of reducing wide periodic
variations in demand of such products, commodities or services, and
means of encouraging conservation of resources and energy.
UT Code Ann. 57-1-1(3) "Real property" or "real estate" means any right,
title, estate, or interest in land, including all nonextracted minerals
located in, on, or under the land, all buildings, fixtures and improvements
on the land, and all water rights, rights-ofiway, easements, rents, issues,
profits, income, tenements, hereditaments, possessory rights, claims,
including mining claims, privileges, and appurtenances belonging to, used,
or enjoyed with the land or any part of the land.
OTHER
Rocky Mountain Power, RMP, ELECTRIC SERVICE REGULATION 7,
METERING- 1. INSTALLATION: All meter locations and provisions for
connecting metering equipment are subject to approval by the
company... The company will install, own and maintain all meters and
other metering devices (excluding the meter base’s cabinets) necessary for
measuring the electric power and energy used by the customer.
2. NON-STANDARD METERING ACCOMMODATION
A customer owning a premise and receiving service from the company,
who requests an accommodation from the company’s standard meter
installations, may choose from the following accommodations:
A. Relocation of the company’s meter (standard or non-standard) from its
current location to a different company approved location
B. Exchange of a standard meter for an approved non-standard meter; or
C. Relocation of the metering and the exchange of a standard meter for an
approved non-standard meter.
...Only non-standard meters approved, obtained, installed and owned by
the company will be allowed. The customer’s request for a non-standard
meter cannot be accommodated until an approved meter can be obtained
by the company. The customer shall pay the installation charge given in
Schedule 300 prior to the company installing the non-standard meter.
The customer choosing the meter exchange accommodating shall also pay
the monthly manual meter reading fee in schedule 300 charge which will
be included in the customer’s monthly service billing. These Schedule 300
charges are in addition to any relocation expense.
The company may revoke the meter exchange accommodation of a non
standard meter by reinstalling a standard meter for any of the following
conditions:
A. Meter tampering
B. Impeding company access to meter to obtain monly meter readings,
perform maintenance or to disconnect meter for non-payment of electric
service, or
C. Service has been disconnected for non-payment of electric service twice
within a 12-month period.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
After stopping daily 2 am heart attacks in 2016 by wrapping my 4G RF
house eclectic meter with aluminum screen to lower its 4 G intensity, I asked
the governor’s utilities to remove the 4G RF meter and replace it with the no
heart attacking analog meter that Rocky mountain power (RMP) had secretly
removed and replaced with the 4G RF meter in violation of my analog contact
with UT Light & Power for an analog meter. RMP’s electric service regulation 7
and schedule 300 of its tariff allows an alternative metering system. RMP
claims to own the RF meter, violation of UT Code 54-3-1 and 57-1-1(3). I told
RMP to take the 4G RF meter. I had purchased my own safe analog meter that
did not cause daily heart attacks. Both meters measure electricity equally.
Meters are an appurtenance, UT Code 57-1-1(3), giving ownership to the owner.
Once the 4G RF meter was attached, I owned it and I can remove it. I want to
live. The analog meter grants me my liberty blessing to live. Herbert’s
revelation law says I die.
RMP refused to switch the safe analog meter, the only alternative
metering system known. I told my electrician, costing $4,000 to repair the 4G
damage to my house wires, to put it on. RMP said if he did, I could not buy
electricity. My electrician refused. Herbert’s revelation law I die governed to
take my home, wealth, through his loan-shark Medicaid scam is outrageous for
a secondary insurance plan. I could have purchased cheaper secondary
insurance and would have had I known I was making an ins. Loan. I realized in
2016 I had been denied Medicaid and was given a UT loan-shark loan without
/ (o,
truth in lending and asked the district court who the person of interest is in 571-1(3). Mag. Wells said the private property owner is.
RMP would not comply with 54-3-1 nor 57-1-1(3) nor allow an alternative
metering system from her electric service regulation 7 and schedule 300 of her
tariff, an alternative metering system. I refuse to die from 4G RF radiation
poisoning. Defendant’s departments signed RMP’s tariff rewriting 54-3-1 which
does not allow service providers to own anything on my property or make any
decision for enjoyment of it or render unsafe service. I could take off the
broadcasting 4G RF meter putting 4G on my wall wires, but not my safe analog
meter that does not put me instantly into heart attack like 4G EKG proves
happens. Taking off a 4G RF meter and putting on another 4G RF meter is not
an alternative metering system. It is the same system. Utah Public Utilities
refused to obey RMP’s tariff of an alternative analog metering system. Utah
Public commission refused to obey RMP’s tariff, listed in its order of continued
4G RF meter causing radar poisoning. A commissioner was an RMP consultant.
The UPC order claims I would not allow RMP to put on an alternative
system, not true. I asked to trade the 4G RF meter for an analog meter. RMP
refused to do so. I have died twice from 4G RF meter radar. Thousands die from
4 G caused heart attacks who have no history of heart disease. I want to live.
Tortured to death is unbearable. Utah state courts refused to order RMP to
obey its tariff law and give an alternative analog meter system. Defendant
refused to order RMP to obey its tariff law. The Northern Dist. Ct of UT refused
to order Herbert to obey RMP’s tariff allowing me to choose a safe fair metering
system pursuant to UT Code 54-3-1 and 57-1-1(3), I own the 4G RF meter,
1%
appurtenance, attached to my property. Once a revelation is issued, no one will
address, change or cancel it. It is set in stone. The LDS judges at the appeals
upheld Herbert’s revelation I am to die so he can take my wealth after death.
The LDS judges removed the assigned judges to my action, Kmykovich, chief
judge, and Barharach, circuit judge. I did not know this had been done until I
received their dismissal or I would have come to the Sup Ct to stop removal to
allow LDS to rule on their guilt.
The district court LDS judges, implemented their shadow constitution in
place of the US constitution and dismissed with prejudice. Rehearing’s failed to
alter defendant’s revelation law I am to die to take my wealth from Herbert’s
Medicaid loan-shark shocking $322,900.00 scam. The shadow government has a
law- exterminate nonmembers to get their wealth.
I qualified for Medicaid, but was secretly denied Medicaid. The UT Medicaid
loan-shark sold me a secondary insurance loan-plan costing $322,900.00.1
would never have agreed to this outrageous fee violating truth in lending and
violating A. 8’s barring excessive fees.
The 4G RF meter turns my home into a microwave oven with radiation
coming from wall wires causing heart attack, Alzheimer, tumor (left breast),
cancer, heart disease and death by torture. See National Toxicology report,
2019. RMP said they cannot get analog meters. I purchased one online. The RF
4G meter destroyed a 3 yr. old dish washer, washer, dryer, garbage disposal,
my range, frig and caused unknown other appliance damages. I try to save
money in home repairs but food, clothing, transportation and other steal it. The
subcontractor said my analog meter and sending monthly photos by email
l3 t
would work. Later he recanted. RMP owned my meter and refused to remove it.
RMP can determine if I live or die from 4G radar in violation of my secured
blessings of liberty. The 4G FR meter, appurtenance, is mine, not RMP, who
appears to be planning a massive land grab having their meters.
I filed a Tenth Circuit appeal to regain control over my land. I showed the
shadow government’s birth in 1871 and its 4th declaration of war on the US
establishing a corporate seat of government, instead of a republic seat in the
Act of 1871. The senate, house and federal government enforce shadow
government revelations instead of our US constitution. I showed Dartmouth did
not authorize application of corporation to New Hampshire. Young’s application
of corporation to Greater Salt Lake City in 1851 was done without Dartmouth
authority to do so. The corporate shadow government operating inside our
republic is repugnant to our US constitution. Smith’s law: fight till all LDS are
dead or all nonmembers are dead has resulted in hundreds of battle fronts
designed to murder nonmembers: heavy micro sized metals put into our air
thru jet exhaust, fluoride water, hormone & drug meats, having eaten grains
soaked in cancer causing roundup, chemicals in our clothing, bedding,
furniture, carpets... LDS cannot rest until all nonmembers are dead. Our hands
are tied. We must destroy all shadow citizens who have never given up for 170+
years. No one knew!
The assigned judges to my appeal recused and were replaced by judges
from the shadow government to rule upon their own guilty. Shadow
government’s priesthood revelation constitution and I say so law dismissed my
case for failure of a cause of action but found two reliefs, bur refused
) Q-t /
defendant’s brie’s admission of guilt, page 10 line 16: Schmidt vaguely alleges
interference with her rights to pursue “happiness” or to secure the “blessings of
liberty to ourselves and our posterity” and asks for an order stopping the
Governor from interfering with those rights. But the complaint does not
identify any conduct of the Governor that violates those rights. R 5-6.” My
action was dismissed for failure to state a cause. One must know the cause to
recognize a relief. All parties told the appeals court my cause and relief. They
refused to receive it. I won my appeal, yet it was dismissed with prejudice!
I had challenged appeals court standing to corporate VP Hebert, citizen of a
foreign conquering government, who was impersonating a republic governor.
Corporate VP Herbert’s shadow government operating inside our republic is an
unauthorized application of corporation to government and is repugnant to our
constitution. Justice is not valued in the corporate shadow government. I sent
Pres. Trump my analysis of the appeals dismissal and asked him to implement
Schmidt’s Amendment 10 Law and create a second A. 7 judicial system. I have
heard nothing. I believe Fate wants this supreme court to address using Roe to
abort my secured blessings of liberty and the existence of the LDS corporate
shadow government operating inside our republic. This court has a chance to
alter the Art. 3 system. I request this court hear this matter, examine Roe, a
shadow government in a government and so forth. See the constitutional quotes
for damages done to me.
10,
REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION
* 1. The appeals court’s dismissal proves a shadow government, born 1838, is
operating inside our republic that controls the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.
This shadow government uses opposite meaning law, written in her 1871
corporate seat of government, is repugnant to our US constitution and supreme
law.
* 2. The appeals court implemented a predetermined decision to dismiss
resulting in meritless findings and reasons for dismissing.
* 3. The appeals court barred me from being part of their final adjudication
and held an exparte hearing with their predetermined decision and
predetermined findings coming from defendant’s brief only, no due process.
* 4. The appeals court rejected my reply brief showing defendant’s brief admits
his guilt, on page 10 line 16, which my brief accepted-T win, not lose.
*
5. The partiality of the appeals court is found in its dismissal.
* 6. The appeals court vacated the equity court coming from British
magistrates who referenced Mosaic law. The equity court allows the defendant to
determine his own punishment by the punishment he gave me. The appeals
court heard defendant’s shadow government cry to save him, right or wrong, and
wrongly saved him.
* 7. The appeals court upheld defendant’s revelation law that 4 G radiation
will be maintained and not removed from my home according to UT Code 54-3-1,
57-1-1(3) and Rocky Mt. Power’s tariff. Shadow government law exterminates
nonmembers to get their wealth. Defendant secretly caused me to believe I had
Medicaid when I had a UT loan-shark loan costing over $230,000.00.1 could
have gotten very cheap insurance for what Medicare did not pay elsewhere. The
4G RF meter caused over 300 heart attacks which ceased after I diminished its
intensity. There was no manual given with the 4G RF meter like cell phones
give. I still have heart disease and cannot control it until the source of radiation
poisoning is removed. I cannot heal other diseases till the meter is removed and I
have punitive damages to pay for medical treatments used in Europe.
* 8. The appeals court is bound to our US constitution and supreme law
because she is housed in a state.
* 9. Roe v Wade was used by the appeals court to abort my original citizenship
and secured blessings of liberty.
* 10. The shadow government controlled appeals court declared war upon our
constitution and her supreme law by dismissing my action asking they strip
defendant of court standing and UT of statehood with her falsified enabling act.
UT would have been removed from controlling her corporate seat of government
and the federal government. UT has never submitted to our constitution and
2.1,
supreme law. UT uses her revelation law to govern America politically. Amend 1
forbids congress to write law governing religion and Amend 1 forbids rebgion to
write revelation law governing America. Religions that write law governing
America are not religions but governments operating on American soil.
* 11. The appeals court saved the shadow government from exposure and being
over thrown without flying bullets by giving corporate VP defendant standing to
win and me court standing to lose. Understanding the shadow government is
necessary to identify the law used in this appeal and separate our republic from
the shadow government.
* 12. The assigned judges ordered oral argument on my judicial recusal motion
filed late in the filing process showing a fight occurred over whether the shadow
or republic presided. The no shadow judges stepped aside and allowed biased
shadow judges to continue declaring war on America. Roe v Wade was created
for the purpose of dismantling our US constitution with revelation law and mind
controlling the masses.
* 13. The appeals court denied ordered oral argument on my motion requesting
corporate VP Herbert, impersonating a republic governor, be denied court
standing at the appeals level for being a foreign government official determined
to maintain the shadow government’s 1871 overthrow of the senate, house and
federal departments, their 1913 conquered states and their 1973 nullifying our
constitution.
* 14. The appeals court aborted every court liberty afforded by our constitution
as was done in district court and in Roe v Wade on unborn alive citizens. The
appeals court denied me my defenses, trial, and conviction based on truth and
reality. They stripped me of equal protection of the law and refused to protect my
life, liberty, and property without due process. The appeals court and her
dismissal are repugnant to our US constitution.
* 15. The appeals court upheld defendant using Roe to strike my citizenship’s
secured blessings of liberty like Roe does to unborn alive citizen’s blessings of
liberty, who are executed without information, defense, trial and conviction--due
process. I asked defendants’ utility departments, UT courts, US district court
and the Tenth circuit court for help, but all refused to submit to our US
constitution and her supreme law and give me help. They submitted to the
shadow governments constitution and I say so [sharia] law that I die.
* 16. The appeals court striped me of all due process to keep their shadow
government incognito and to refuse evidence UT’s enabling act is false, fraud,
and deceit to get statehood and rule over her corporate seat of government
created 20 years prior to statehood. Statehood allowed the corporate shadow
government to instantly operate inside our republic.
1L.
* 17. The appeals court knows their shadow government is easily separated
from our republic government after the existence of the shadow government is
known.
* 18. The appeals court is aware that knowledge of the shadow government
will show Roe had absolutely no jurisdiction to have issued from the shadow
government’s control of the US Sup. Ct. The Roe court had no idea they were in
an unconstitutional repugnant court because they did not know of the shadow
governments existence. Defendant’s brief has 3 stages of astonishing written
mind control--the same control used to get a hostile congress to create the
shadow’s corporate seat.
& 19. The appeals court upheld their shadow government’s revelation law
allowing defendant to murder and go unpunished that Blackmun put in Row V
Wade. Defendant was not found guilty of using the 4G RF meter’s microwave
radiation to murder me twice after entrance into the IHC ER.. I was very sick
from radiation poisoning.
* 20. The appeals court is aware their shadow government’s application of
Dartmouth v Woodward’s corporation was not granted to New Hampshire.
Dartmouth did not authorize application of corporation to government. The
shadow government stock piles her revelation laws in case law which they use in
place of our constitution and supreme law. The shadow government rejects
constitutional supreme law and mandates only the use of case law which can
prove anything while constitutional law cannot.
* 21. The appeals court is aware their shadow government’s corporate seat of
government was how the shadow government conquered the house, senate, and
federal government,. The appeals court knows their shadow government is fragile
and can be easily toppled. It can be defeated merely by President Trump moving
the house and senate to camp David until a republic seat of government is
created elsewhere. The public instantly identifies the source of lost liberties and
rights, depending upon which citizenship they have.
* 22. The appeals court is aware no member of congress wifi reveal their
allegiance to a foreign government operating upon American soil and risk
indefensible charges of treason. Pres. Trump calls the shadow government the
Deep State yet has begun attacks against the shadow government. The shadow
government knows the government that controls the law and economy, controls
America. Shadow congressional members chose the court and finance
committees.
* 23. The appeals court is aware that both Roe and Dartmouth are repugnant
to our US constitution and must be stricken from being referenced in any court.
Both cases are protected to maintain governing revelation law.
* 24. The appeals court is aware UT code 54-3-1 protects Utahans from the
bodily harm done by 4 G RF meter microwave frequencies and radiation
a
f
poisoning and that the UT shadow government allowed Rocky Mt. Power’s
priesthood brethren to rewrite this code in her tariff for a future land grab. No
one supervises RMP who is granted whatever law demanded--testimony of Ms.
Wright, UT Pub. Utilities.
* 25. Testimonies are replacing science in decision making. The 5G summit
revealed the FCC bore testimony it is safe. Therefore, no scientific studies will be
considered to allow 5G to proceed when we the people want fast private safe fiber
glass, not disease causing 5G.
* 26. The appeals court is aware the National Toxicology Report shows 2G and
3G must be barred from operating in America. They cause tumors, cancer, heart
disease and death by torture. 4G is premeditated murder and going unpunished
found in Roe, until Pres. Trump, governors and prosecutors admit there is no
presidential pardon in Roe v Wade who puts all abortionists on death row. I sent
my findings on Roe’s subject matter and party jurisdictions to some state
governors showing Roe had no jurisdiction to issue. I believe Pres. Trump also
has this info. Now the Supreme Ct. has it.
* 27. The appeals court is aware the 4G intensity is designed to exterminate
nonmembers. A shadow government revelation mandates all shadow citizens to
fight till they are all dead or all nonmember citizens are dead. After 170 years of
the shadow government murdering nonmembers for their wealth, we must admit
all shadow members must die—they will never stop fighting to kill and rule over
us. Russia wants nonmember’s dead, too. Putin has bragged he will take over
America when her citizens are crazy (from radiation brain damage and inability
to defend America). I don’t want to learn Russian.
* 28. The appeals court is aware that allowing RMP’s electric regulation
schedule to alter UT codes 54-3-1 and 57-1-1(3) is unconstitutional premeditated
murder in preparation for their tariff putting RMP’s name on my deed. The
shadow already enforced a revelation law that the wealth of nonmembers
belongs to the shadow government who owns the original deed to all everyone
owns. Defendant knows the original deed gives him ownership of my property
wealth without having to burn me out or drive me off my property as was done in
the 1838 Missouri war. I read a Roe decision in 1973 telling of LDS persecutions
and extortion on Texass that is used upon me in UT by shadow members today.
Roe has been cleaned, yet I cannot remove this memory nor deny it.
* 29. The appeals court is aware the preamble’s secured blessings of liberty
have been aborted by the corporate shadow government’s Roe v Wade.
* 30. The appeals court is aware Article 3.1’s judicial system can no longer be
trusted. It must be replaced by Amendment 7’s judicial system.
* 31. The appeals court is aware I seized Amendment 10 pre-ratified people
power to convene and determine the proceedings of the amendment 7 common
law court.
* 32. The appeals court is aware knows I have asked Pres. Trump and
governors to provide access to this seized amendment 7 court system power. UT
refuses to recognize Amend. 10’s pre-ratified powers.
* 33. The appeals court is aware Amendment 11 bars my action to be heard by
citizens of a foreign state which the judges who dismissed are members of.
Patriotic judges do not write dismissals on the grounds used to dismiss my action
at the Tenth Circuit court.
* 34. The appeals court is aware Article 4.2 mandates all American citizens
have the same privileges and immunities given citizens in other states, The
appeals court refused to allow me to access cannabis for my radiation tumor and
pain. Defendant rewrote the law we US citizens in UT passed. He claimed to
make the law better when he convened the legislature to rewrite the law to be
what corporate president Nelson wanted.
* 35. The appeals court is aware Art 4.2 mandates a republic form of
government and bars their corporate shadow government from operating inside
our republic.
* 36. The appeals court is aware Art. 4.2 mandates a republic seat of
government, not a foreign enemy corporate shadow government seat.
* 37. The appeals court is aware A. 17 does not notice states they consent to
give up their senate suffrage, when they ratified A. 17.
* 38. The appeals court is aware A. 17 did not transfer state suffrage to the
senate. A 17 is repugnant to our US constitution for failing to give the elected by
the people senators any power, authority or jurisdiction to write and pass law.
* 39. The appeals court is aware A. 17 created unconstitutional senators
usurping state senate suffrage to pass unconstitutional unbinding law since
1913.
* 40. The appeals court is aware their tenth circuit dismissal refused to be
bound to Art 6.
* 41. The appeals court is aware religious tests must be given to identify spies
from the corporate shadow government hiding behind a false religious front.
* 42. The appeals court is aware Amendment 1 does not allow their shadow
governments religious revelations to govern our republic.
* 43. The appeals court is aware the supreme court may be held liable for the
consequences of Roe v Wade along with all shadow government judges who have
upheld Roe.
* 44. The appeals court is aware the newly appointed supreme court may come
to her senses and bar authorities from governing in any American court to deny
51
a party of being faced with witnesses against and remove shadow government
law.
* 45. The appeals court is aware Amendment 7’s common law court is cheaper,
quicker, and more accurate when used according to Schmidt’s Amendment 10
pre-ratified constitutional mandates.
* 46. The appeals court is aware their shadow governments scam to take the
wealth of nonmembers without cause are excessive fees and crimes which must
be stopped and reversed.
The appeals court is aware Roe prepares all citizens to accept mass murder of
those the shadow corporate government must murder to preserve her existence.
* 47. The appeals court is aware irreparable damage is done to my appliances
yet denied forcing defendant’s implemented 4 G be liable for these damages. I am
left holding the bag. This is cruel and unusual punishment of this poor
American.
* 48. The appeals court is aware irreparable damage has been done to my body
from radiation poisoning, yet denied any compensation to find doctors in Russia
or Europe who dealt with radiation poisoning after WWII. This is cruel unusual
punishment.
* 49. The appeals court is aware it is better for this supreme court to identify
and uphold the 2 citizenships in America--we the original citizens of the US
linked to secured blessings of liberty and Amendment 14’s naturalized
citizenship rights linked to Amendment 5’s rights.
* 50. The appeals court is aware it is better for the supreme court to limit the
naturalized citizenship from holding public office or government employment
until 14 generations or 400 + years have passed.
* 51. The appeals court is aware the House of Israel slaves led out of Egypt
could not understand or accept the freedoms given them in the desert. The
appeals court knows God slay them to prevent God’s laws from governing the
New Promised land. Each slave had 14 slave ancestor generations locked in their
genes. It would take 400 + years to silence these ancestor demands for
implementing Egyptian slavery and idol worship in the new promised land.
Illegals have the same gene problem. They can never understand our American
culture for over 400 years. Omar proves this. Our founding fathers 2 citizenships
take into account the 14 ancestor generations when giving black Americans
citizenship in A. 14.
* 52. The appeals court is aware both citizenships are linked to 14 generations
demanding their homeland laws govern America instead of America’s homeland
laws. Original citizenship demands America’s homeland law governs here.
3-lp.
* 53. The appeals court is aware it is better for this supreme court to restore
the judges as at the beginning of our nation than for President Trump to do it or
revolting American Christians to do it.
* 54. The appeals court is aware it is better for this supreme court to
overthrow the corporate shadow government than for Trump or the people to do
it.
The shadow government has come up with a new plan to govern America
without unconquered presidential input- That’s because the GND, [Green New
Deal], introduced in the US House and senate in February, isn’t a law or a bill or
a policy. Its a non-binding resolution. Congress will vote on it, but it won’t be
signed into law by the president. Non-binding resolutions are viewed as a
commitment by congress to a general goal, or in the case of the GND, a set of
goals. Hogwash! It’s law. Roe is law and no one voted on it. The shadow
government knows how to get what it wants! The president must issue an
executive order striking all congressional nonTaws, non-bills, and non-policies,
on the grounds Art. 1.1 creates a congress that only writes legislative laws, not
goals for organizations to endorse- The Organic Consumers Association (OCA)
and our sister nonprofit, Regeneration International, fully endorse the Green
New Deal (GND) as the most promising policy-level vehicle for achieving the
large-scale transition to an organic, regenerative food and farming system, while
at the same time cleaning up the environment, advancing social justice,
restoring urban and rural food and economic security, and destabilizing the
climate. httpsV/www.organicconsumers.org/essavs/why-we-endorsegreennewdeahand-how-we-plan-supportit?utm medium=email&utm source=engagingnetworks&utm campaign=OB+63
5&utm content=OB+635+Saturdav+
https V/redirect.viglink.com/?u=http%3A%2F%2Forganicconsumers.org&key=fb3
da3418dae370da3c415cf613a8b86
* 55. The appeals court is aware Americans no longer have their voice in
government or I would have had oral argument as ordered by the judges
assigned to my appeal and my briefs and evidence would have convicted
defendant along with his briefs admission of guilt.
* 56.1 attended the online 5 G summit. No one wants 5G. All want safe fiber
that does not cause tumors, cancer, heart disease and death by torture found by
the National Toxicology Program report on 2G and 3G cell phones using
maximum of 3.8 volts. The 4 G RF meters maximum is 120-200 volts depending
upon the voltage the meter’s internal switches add to the house wires. This is
more than 32 cell phones or 32+ more bodily harm done by the 4G RF microwave
meter. No one uses their cell 24/7. The 4 G RF meter never turns off.
NTP conducted toxicology studies in rates and mice to help clarify potential
health hazards, including cancer risk from exposure to RFR like that used in 2G
A7,
and 3 G cell phones operating within a rage offrequencies from about 700-2700
megahertz (MHz). The NTPstudies found that high exposure to RFR (900MHz)
used by cell phones was associated with•'
•
•
•
Clear evidence of tumors in the hearts ofmale rats. The tumors were
malignant schwannomas.
Some evidence of tumors in the brains ofmale rats. The tumors were
malignant gliomas.
Some evidence of tumors in the adrenal glands ofmale rats. The tumors
were benign, malignant, or complex combinedpheochromocytoma.
It was unclear if tumors observed in the studies were associated with exposure to
RFR in female rats (900 MHz) and male and female mice (1900MHz). This is also
known as equivocal evidence.
The final conclusions represent the consensus between NTP and a panel of
external scientific experts who thoroughly reviewed the draft NTP technical
reports at a public meeting in March 2018.
The results are based on NTP’s four categories of evidence that a substance may
cause cancer- clear evidence (highest), some evidence, equivocal evidence, no
evidence (lowest). ...Additionally, concern has been raised because the 5G
network will also use higher frequencies, up to 60,000 MHz, thereby exposing
wireless consumers to a much broader spectrum offrequencies. The higher
frequencies, known as millimeter waves, can rapidly transmit enormous
amounts of data with increased network capacity compared to current
technologies. Millimeter waves do not travel as far and do not penetrate the body
as deep as the wavelengths from the lower frequencies. Millimeter waves are
likely to penetrate no deeper than the skin, as opposed to the lower frequencies
that have been shown to penetrate at least three to four inches into the human
bo<iy.https://ntp. niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/cellphones/index.html
Scientist Martin Pall, PhD, has analyzed how the radar goes 20 times deeper
into the body than admitted. It breaks DNA strands causing mutations, changes
and cancer. It affects reproduction, increases abortions, causes emf oxidative and
free radical damages. Low doses do not kill cells like large doses eliminating the
damage. The damaged cell changes and affects the organ or body. Emfs activate
blocked calcium channels exploding cells with more calcium than it can use.
Heart patients taking calcium blocking drugs are greatly affected. Scientist Pall
has spent time educating all who will listen to emf radiation poison effects,
https V/w ww.researchgate. net/profi.le/Martin_P all,
“Look at the summits political organization^ We have amazing news! 20,312
elected reps have been notified by summit participants through our call to action
form that WE do not consent to the 5G rollout! Thanks to YOU the summit is not
at
only raising awareness, but generating a critical mass of positive action as well.
Please help us spread this information far and wide.
This weekend, we learned that two separate, planned installations of 5G
equipment WERE HALTED by telcos after local elected officials received emails
from our summit! You’ve now sent more than 80,000 “instant action'’ email
notices•
•
•
•
In the USA, 55,794 emails to 18,982 officials
In Canada, 11,044 emails to 583 officials
In Australia, 12,788 emails to 559 officials
And more in other parts of the world!
we want to thank you for making The 5G Crisis Summit the most-attended
online summit in the 6-year history of Health Talks Online's events!”
* 57. The appeals court is aware of the shadow governments revelation their
“missionary’s mercenary recruiters” will be sent home. Mercenaries think they
joined a church instead of a shadow government operating inside our republic
and they are replacing dead shadow government soldiers.
* 58. The shadow government is losing control. God will not allow the shadow
government, to control America much longer. The presidency has not been
conquered: WASHINGTON -As an answer to the government shutdown crisis,
The Church of Jesus Christ ofLatter-day Saints has announced that Church
President Thomas S. Monson met with President Obama today with one single
proposal•' “The LDS Church [shadow government operating inside our republic]
will run the government during the shutdown. ”
http://www.thebunvion.com/2Q13/10/01/lds-church-runs-government-duringshutdown/
This request from Obama proves the shadow government is not a religion but a
government hiding behind a religious front which bars politicians from
challenging their revelation laws because they are religious beliefs. This has
worked for over 170 years. The shadow government has governed America’s
federal, state and constitution for over 170 years! Obama would never have
gotten his presidency back and would have faced a firing squad.
* 59.1 grew up a member of the shadow government. I was taught the above
shadow revelations were religious revelations. I realized the shadow government
is operating inside our republic. I terminated my shadow citizenship.
* 60. I fell in love with our constitution when in the 2nd grade. I am an eye
witness to the above shadow hatreds for her own people and nonmembers. I had
not been taught of early revelations to exterminate the gentiles for their
possessions. I now know God would not give the fruits of the worker to the idler.
I had puzzle pieces until I read the act of 1971 creating a corporate seat of
government.
^9
i
* 61.1 was taught to recognize, seek and revere truth at the age of 11. Most
shadow youth lost their shadow church testimonies creating an inner war till
now. The puzzle pieces came together in a terrifying terrorist puzzle showing I
had been a devil worshiper.
* 62. This supreme court will never bow to Corporate Pres. Monson and will be
executed for treason.
* 63. This case must be heard to preserve America lives, prevent revolt, and
restore America’s republic government.
CONCLUSION
The petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted.
Respectfully submitted,
September 13, 2019.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.