Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jeffrey P. Corbin, Petitioner v. Federal Express, dba FedEx
Supreme Court briefJul 2, 2018
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
No.____
In the
6upreme Court at the Mufteb 6tate,4
Jeffrey P. Corbin,
Petitioner,
—v—
Federal Express, dfb/a/ FedEx,
Respondents.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the
United States Court Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
JEFFREY P. CORBIN
PETITIONER PRO SE
481 REDDECK ROAD
NEWPORT NEWS, VA 23608
(757)660-8337
HEYJPAUL@GMAIL.COM
JULY 2, 2018
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
Whether any of the district court's procedural and evidentiary rulings
constituted an abuse of discretion requiring reversal of a judgement.
Whether filing Title VII action to which the underlying EEOC charge failed
to assert retaliation, an amended complaint allegation asserting retaliation as the
motive for an employment termination was an alternative to the original complaint
allegation that the Termination! Constructive Discharge was a result of a
discriminatory motive affects federal-court subject matter jurisdiction in the action
or, instead, delineates a substantive ingredient of a Title VII claim for relief to be
resolve on the merits on this case.
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUESTIONSPRESENTED.......................................................................................
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .....................................................................................iii
OPINIONSBELOW ..................................................................................................1
JURISDICTION.........................................................................................................1
STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED................................................................1
STATEMENT OF THE CASE...................................................................................1
Summary of the Case......................................................................................1
Offer Letter History........................................................................................4
Case Details.....................................................................................................4
ARGUMENT............................................................................................................20
Summary of Argument .................................................................................20
Supporting Proof for Argument....................................................................22
CONCLUSION.......................................................................................................... 24
Appendix Table of Contents
Per Curiam Opinion of the Fourth Circuit (April 3, 2018) ............ App. 1
Order of the District Court Denying a New Trial and Denying
Awarding of Costs (June 4, 2018 ....................................................App.4
Jury Verdict (November 2, 2017) .................................................... App. 11
Evidence of Defendant Federal Express Perjury and Other
SupportingMaterial........................................................................App.12
Transcript Evidence ........................................................................App.56
11
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody,
422 U.S. 405 (1975)
Adickes v. SHKress & Co.,
398 Us 144 (1970)
Alexander v. Choate,
469 Us 287, 105 S. Ct. 712, 83 L. Ed. 2d 661 (1985)
Arba ugh v. Y& H Coip.,
546 Us 500, 126 S. Ct. 1235, 163 L. Ed. 2d 1097 (2006)
Atascadero State Hospital v. Scanlon,
473 Us 234, 105 S. Ct. 3142, 87 L. Ed. 2d 171 (1985)
Bercovitch v. Baldwin School,
964 F. Supp. 597 (D.P.R. 1997)
Bra gdon v. Abbott,
524 Us 624, 118 S. Ct. 2196, 141 L. Ed. 2d 540 (1998)
Brown v. GSA,
425 Us 820, 96 S. Ct. 1961, 48 L. Ed. 2d 402 (1976)
Calero -Cerezo v. US Dept. of Justice,
355 F.3d 6 (2004)
Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.,
526 Us 795, 119 S. Ct. 1597, 143 L. Ed. 2d 966 (1999)
Delaware State College v. Ricks,
449 Us 250, 101 S. Ct. 498, 66 L. Ed. 2d 43 1(1980)
Doe v. University ofMaryland Medical System Corp.,
50 F. 3d 1261 (1995)
Franks v. Bowman Transp. Co.,
424 US 747, 96 S. Ct. 1251, 47 L. Ed. 2d 444 (1976)
Griggs v. Duke Power Co.,
401 U 5 424, 849. 28. L. Ed. 2d 158 (197 1)
Henrietta D. v. Bloomberg,
331 F. 3d 261 2d (2003)
Lane v. Pena,
518 US 187, 116 S. Ct. 2092, 135 L. Ed. 2d 486 (1996)
Lovell v. Chandler,
303 F. 3d 1039 Court of Appeals (9th Cir. 2002)
McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transp. Co.,
427 US 273, 96 S. Ct. 2574, 49 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1976)
111
Northcross v. Memphis Board of Education,
412 U. S. 93, S Ct 2201 L.Ed. 2d 48 (1973)
Sylvia Connor v. Family Dollar Store,
36 So. 3d 339 (2010)
Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.,
519 US 337, 117 S. Ct. 843, 136 L. Ed. 2d 808 (1997)
United States v. Sla wik,
548 F. 2d 75 3rd Ct (1977)
'V
OPINIONS BELOW
The Opinion of the Fourth Circuit, dated April 3, 2018, is included below at
App.1. The order of the District Court Denying a New Trial and Denying the
Awarding of Costs is included below at App.4. Neither opinion is published.
JURISDICTION
The opinion of the Fourth Circuit was issued on April 3, 2018 (App.1). This
Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1254(a).
STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED
• 42 U.S.C. § 2000e
• 29U.S.C.211
• 29 U.S.C. § 626
• 42 U.S.C. § 12117
• 42 U.S.C. § 2000ff-6
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
A.
Summary of the Case
I (Petitioner) began employment for Federal Express on April 20, 1992 in Denver
Colorado until my termination on Feb 5, 2014. I (Petitioner) worked 21 years 9
months and 16 days. Hello name is Jeffrey P Corbin, I am a 59 year old Petitioner in
this case and I am African American. I am a husband to Patricia Corbin of 28 years
and father to three, our oldest daughter Brandi is mother to our two grandchildren,
middle daughter is Janea and our son is Devin.
In 2001 we made the decision to move to Virginia after school was out in 2002 to
be closer to family, instead of using the flying benefits offered by Federal Express
1
that we used yearly before the destruction of World Trade Towers. This was an
opportunity to increase my chances of becoming a mechanic with Federal Express. In
June of 2002 after school was recessed for the
I (Petitioner) have applied for several positions in the 21 years of employment
with Federal Express. I've worked as a cargo handler to a Driver in four different
positions at three locations and my final position I've held three different positions at
three location of Offer Letters.
I (Petitioner) moved into the Norfolk position on March 18, 2013 as a SR.
Vehicle/GSE Technician DOT/CDL Vehicle Maintenance Dept. This location is a two
man shop of Petitioner and Tom Scott, the shop is locked by combination in order to
get inside the shop, one would had to have the combination. Within the first two
weeks, I had to work with coworker Tom Scott who is the Technician on the AM shift
so I could get familiar with the shop.
In the first week at Norfolk I (Petitioner) asked Scott to show me the ropes on
how the Norfolk Ramp works, Scott immediately replied "It would take someone like
you (Petitioner) thirty years to learn what's on the GSE". I took this comment as
discriminatory but I did not allow it to detour me from the mission at hand and that
was to do the job that I was hired to do. Scott wasn't interested in showing me
anything so I (Petitioner) left Scott and went about doing what needed to do.
March 25, 2013 was my second week of working with Scott. I (Petitioner) soon
began to see that Scott was checking behind me on the jobs that I was completing, he
(Scott) wasn't my manager, boss or supervisor and Scott action took me by surprise.
During the two weeks that Scott and I (Petitioner) worked in the same building (but
not together), Scott wanted nothing to do with me so I stayed out of his way. Scott
would ask me questions on how I repaired certain jobs, I (Petitioner) answered his
(Scott) question he (Scott) would reply "That's Bullshit", telling me his way was
better.
Within the third week I continue to see that my work was being check and I was
at this point getting frustrated so I made my first call on April 7, 2013, to Manager
Mark Clatterbuck which Clatterbuck never answered so I left a message and
Clatterbuck never returned my (Petitioner's) calls. I began to feel ostracism as if I did
not belong at the Norfolk Ramp and unwelcoming demeanor from Tom Scott
behavior.
Over the course of March 18, 2013 to Oct 7, 2013 and again Jan 6, 2014 to Jan
27, 2014, I (Petitioner) made a total of 61 calls totaling 148 minutes, 54 of the calls
were of me (Petitioner) calling Clatterbuck leaving message after message, and
Clatterbuck returned only 7 of those calls. I (Petitioner) also began contacting Human
Resource Representative Mary Davin on 8/23/2013 to Feb 5, 2014 which, she (Mary
Davin) advised me to "Go through my chain of command", Mary Davin too would not
return calls to me (Petitioner) after I left messages to her. I contacted other HR
Representative's, by phone, 16 calls totaling 210 minutes, all calls turned out to be a
dead end to me (Petitioner) getting any resolution.
3
Offer Letter History
Denver 1992-2002 CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #253 04/20/1992 Offer Letter
CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #247 06/06/1994 Offer Letter
CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #246 11/12/1994 Offer Letter
Dulles IADR AG&T 2002-2003
CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #237/238 06/24/02 Offer letter
Norfolk RTD, RT 2003-2005
CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #229 08/07/03 Offer letter
CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #244 06/10/04 Offer Letter
Connecticut BDLR 2005-2007
CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #242/224 06/15/05 Offer letter
Fredericksburg DGNA 2007-2013
CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #218/219 04/24/07 Offer letter
Norfolk ORFR 2013-2014
CD FDX/CORBIN HR #2183 03/01/13 Offer Letter
CD FDX/CORBIN STATION # 252-266 Employment
Application w/ New Hire Pamphlet
CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #939-942 Jeffrey P. Corbin
Resume
Case Details
I am a Disabled Veterans from the results of both knees being injured while
serving. I joined the Army Reserve in 1989. In Jan of 1990 I was deployed to Desert
Storm. I was released from the Military with an Honorable Discharge and 20%
disability on Dec 17, 1997. Manager Mark Clatterbuck has denied that he knew I was
a Disable Vet to the legal department on an email to Marseah Farmer. Mr.
Clatterbuck also withheld documents from EEOC that he knew of my military
background. Mr. Clatterbuck and I updated my Performance Review in Prism for 7
to 8 years and Clatterbuck thanked me for my services to the country, where my
veteran and disability status was located. FedEx withheld those documents by not
11
submitting them on the CD FDX/CORBIN that was issued on 6/6/2016. Withholding
of these documents only means that FedEx was covering up the truth on their failure
to accommodate Petitioner. FedEx also has a policy in the People's Manual Employee
Handbook for non-discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities that
also provides reasonable accommodation in the employment of the disabled upon
request where such accommodation does not cause undue hardship. Equal
Employment Opportunities were not available to me as it states in the People Manual
that FedEx Express extends equal employment opportunity to all qualified
individuals without regards to race, color, religion, national origin, citizenship,.... etc.,
• Dkt. 1-6 12/18/15 Page 2 Of 12 PagelD# 116 *535 Disabled
Individuals/Reasonable Accommodation.
• Dkt. 1-4 12/18/15 Page 3 Of 4 PagelD# 109 *455 Equal Employment
Opportunity Policy; and
• Dkt 1-4 12/18/15 Page 4 of 4 PagelD# 110 continued from 4-55 Equal Employ.
Opport.
• CD FDX/CORBIN HR #2048-2051 Emails to/from Farmer, Davin and
Clatterbuck
• CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #269, Letter of Commendation.
• CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #270, DD214 Certificate of Release or Discharge
from Active Duty.
• CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #1069, #1105-07, Medical documents from
Military Examination.
• Dkt. 1-2 12/18/15 Page 38 of 67 PagelD#42 Dept. of Veterans Affairs Summary
of Benefits.
• Dkt. 1-2 12/18/15 Page 39 of 67 Page ID#43 VA Benefits Details.
• Dkt. 1-2 12/18/15 Page 40 of 67 Page ID#44 Honorable Discharge Certificate.
• CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #214-215 Employee Information Screen.
Verification of the employees Prism On File screen information is up to date (d)
9/23/09.
5
On March 13, 1992, while serving in the Army as a Reservist, I applied for
employment with Federal Express. I was hired on April 20, 1992 as a material
handler. When I came to work for Federal Express I had previous experience as a
DOT! Driver of Tractor Trailer.
• CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #252-266 Employment Application w/ New Hire
Pamphlet
• CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #939-942 Jeffrey P. Corbin Resume
• CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #317-320, FMCSA/DOT- Covered Employment!
Application History and Agreement to release controlled Substance and
Alcohol
• CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #198 Colorado's 1999 Commercial Driver's
License Copied Listed above Offer Letter Nov. 12, 1994, for the position of a
Tractor Trailer Driver
• CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #349 Virginia's 2014 Commercial Driver's License
Copied
In 1998 I attended DADC Denver Automotive and Diesel College where I
earned my Associated Degree in Automotive. I earned certificates from school as well
as FedEx as I received training required by the job regularly. After graduating in
2001, my wife and I decided to move the family closer to our families living on the
East Coast, after the World Trade Towers we destroyed.
• CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #341 Heavy Duty Electrical ProClinic Certificate
from Interstate Batteries.
• CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #380 ASE Refrigerant Recovery & Recycling
Ronald H. Weiner Pres. ASE
• CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #383 Cummins Diesel Engine Diagnostics Training
Certificate from FedEx
• CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #384 W-Series Diesel Keyless Entry Training
Certificate from FedEx
• CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #390 Vehicle Maintenance Tire Program Certificate
• CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #392 Intro to Electronics Course Certificate from
FedEx
• CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #393 Hydraulic Theory and Applications Course
Certificate from FedEx
• CD FDX/CORBIN STATION #949 Certificates from DADC
In June 2002, after graduating from DADC, my wife and I decided to move to
the East Coast to be closer to our family.
On March 1, 2013, I received an Offer Letter for the position as a Sr.
Vehicle/GSE Technician DOT/CDL in the Maintenance Department at a salary equal
to my current salary. My pay however was not equal because I was receiving less
money after I moved to the Norfolk Ramp. This is where I believed the harassment
truly began. This CD probably should not have come to me with all that is has but I
believe things happen for a reason and for that I will count my blessing to it. I wanted
that Technician job and I did everything correctly to get that job, it's what I went to
school for and I worked my way through the system the right way to get there
sacrificing what I felt I need to do to get that Technician job less than 30 minutes
from my home after all those years of being away from home finally came an
opportunity.
March 18, 2013 I began working at the Norfolk location. Norfolk had different
types of trucks than Fredericksburg where I worked previously. During Tom and
myself two weeks of working together I experience unnecessary behavior that I did
not like. Tom Scott made what I felt were racial comments of "someone like you". The
only thing that separated Tom Scott and I was color. The harassment I was receiving
from Tom Scott began to take a toll on me causing my blood pressure to escalate.
7
Tom's behavior was unnecessary so I began emailing Mark Clatterbuck and I finally
had about all I could take and I threaten to go to HR. I also made phone calls but I
felt Mark was avoiding my calls by not answering or returning my calls. I began to
see more problems with Tom Scott harassing mode swings. I felt his comments were
confrontational during those times when we work together. Scott made it his business
to check my work, testing me with questions on how I would make repairs on certain
jobs. Scott would response with "that's bullshit" after I answered his question. When
it appeared to me that management was not doing anything to resolve my issues I
began to contact Mary Davin but after several calls to her she seem unconcern and
suggested that I go through my chain of command. My management, was my chain
of command and why I was calling to complaining about so I contact another Human
Resources Representatives. I would talk sometime for minutes and after making
several calls there appeared to be no resolution to resolving my issues with Tom,
Mark or Mary. Now my blood pressure is extremely high.
• Dkt 1-3 12/18/15 Page 23 of 35 PagelD# 94 Section #2 Unit 302741 VIR Sept
20, 2013 5:56pm
Mark responded in an email with "We're all adults" just made me mad. Not,
everyone was acting like adults. I knew I had to keep calling Human Resource.
• Dkt 1-3 12/18/15 Page 23 of 35 PagelD# 94 Section #3 Unit 302741 VIR Sept 20,
2013 3:24p m
• Dkt. 1-3 12/18/15 Page 13 of 35 PagelD# 84 7/26/2013, July 29, 2013 3:25 am,
July 29, 2013 1:44 pm
• Dkt. 1-5 filed 12/18/2015 Page 3 of 4 Page ID# 113 555 Anti-Harassment Section:
Complaints
• Dkt. 1-2 filed 12-18-2015 Page 49 of 67 Page ID# 53 Bullet #4 Rebuttal Response
2/10/15 to EEOC
• Dkt. 1-8 filed 12/18/2015 Page 2-4 PagelD# 136 The People Manual Internal
EEO Complaint Process
• Dkt. 1-3 filed 12/18/2015 Page 16 of 35 PagelD# 87 Email: Personal Package Aug
22, 2013 4:33p m
• Dkt. 1-3 filed 12/18/2015 Page 18 of 35 Page ID# 89 Email: Missing item in box
Aug 21, 2013 7:29pm
• Dkt. 1-3 filed 12/18/2015 Page 23 of 35 Page ID# 94 Email: Unit 302741 VIR
Sept 20, 2013 5:56p m
Tom and I worked together more than the two week from March 18, 2013 to
April 5, 2013. We also worked other days as well.
• See Id #321 Email May 20, 2013 9:58 am Subject Tom Scott Vacation
I requested training from Mark Clatterbuck, which was done by computer and
was available at management control. I felt my requested for training were denied,
because Clatterbuck never uploaded the training to my email address. Since the walk
through with Tom Scott did not go well, I felt that I needed that training to be refresh
on the different types of truck at Norfolk compared to the types of trucks at
Fredericksburg. The training I requested was important for me to do my new job as
a Technician and so was the clutch jack tool. The many certificates I have achieved
was only accomplished with the help of management providing that training. Tom
Scott returned from vacation on 7/11 causing problem, making sarcastic comments
just unnecessary remarks.
• See Id #322-323 Email May 28, 2013AM Help
• Dkt. 1-3 filed 12/18/2015 Page 1-35 PagelD# 72 EEOC Initial Complaint Page
2 Question # 4
In Aug, Sept and again in Oct of 2013 I requested a tool (clutch jack) that would
have allowed me without a second person to do my job without reinjuring my right
knee that had already been repaired in July 2012, and prevent the left knee from
more pain that I was already dealing with. I never received the tool and I felt that I
was discriminated against because of my disability and my race. I explained to my
manager that I needed this tool (which could help me in not having to lift a 100 lbs.
clutch from the vehicle) to do my job which is why I requested this tool in the first
place. I felt that I was denied the opportunity to advance at the job when management
failed to provide the tool during Aug- Oct 2013 and Jan 2014 of my employment as a
Mechanic at the Norfolk location. On one hand FedEx has always been about saving
money and when I made the requests for the tool so that I could do the work in house
to save money then someone sends Asset 301876 to a vendor and blame me Petitioner
for that unauthorized repair.
• Dkt. 1-2 filed 12/18/15 Page 51 of 67 Page ID #55. Rebuttal Response page 3 of
8 bullet #3.
• Dkt. 1-25 12/18/15 Page 2-4 PagelD# 202. Chapter 10: Tools 10-1 Tool Guidelines.
• CD FDX/CORBIN STATION # 330-339 Technician Personal Tool Inventory
Jeffs Sheet 1-11 3/2013
I was dealing with a lot of stress and anxiety daily as I came to work knowing
that there would be something else that I would likely have to deal with from Mark
Clatterbuck and Tom Scott. There are several emails between Manager Mark
Clatterbuck sent as a group, myself (Corbin), Scott and others within the work group.
I felt that Tom Scott was gunning for me within the two weeks that I had started and
it continued until I went out on Surgery and when I returned on Jan 6, 2014. I was
10
working really hard to get Clatterbuck to speak with Tom Scott on these matters
because the emails we becoming a bit of bullying, intimidating harassing, and often
times hostile. I felt that the harassment was getting out of hand and I began to feel
threaten by his antagonizing emails listed below.
Extreme Weather: Due to snow coming, Management delivered this email to
the work group.
• Dkt. 1-2 12/18/15 Page 32 of 67 PagelD# 36, this email address starts on the
previous page of
• Dkt. 1-2 12/18/15 Page 30 of 67 PagelD# 34, Jan 22, 2014 @4:49am TScott to
JCorbin
Water Pump: This email I originally started on Aug 30, 2013 2:33 pm and again
on Oct 4, 2013 Tom responded on Oct 7, 2013 2:50 am more than 30 days after I sent
him an email asking him about ordering a water pump and hose or if he wanted me
to order it.
• Dkt. 1-2 12/18/15 Page 43 of 67 PagelD# 47 and
• Dkt. 1-2 12/18/15 Page 42 of 67 PagelD# 46
• Dkt. 1-3 12/18/15 Page 19 of 35 PagelD# 90 Aug 30, 2013 2:33 pm, Oct 4, 2013
2:10 pm
APU Needed AC Maintenance: This unit was sitting in the back by the door
for two weeks with no power. When I contacted TScott had made the repairs and
instead of letting the AC Maintenance know that the repairs we done to the Unit it
sat for two weeks repaired in the same spot it was broken down in.
• Dkt. 1-3 12/18/15 Page 4 of 35 PagelD# 75 4/22/13, 4/23/13 346 am and 5:30
pm
11
Fwd: Computer wireless access: This email was left in view for me to see so I
copied it, but this is how TScott talked to the manager. Insubordinate at best. This is
why I think TScott talked to me the way he did. Tom Scott (he) showed no respect in
the way he talked to Manager Mark Clatterbuck then there is a guarantee that I was
not going to get any respect from (him) TScott either.
• Dkt. 1-2 12/18/15 Page 44 of 67 PageID# 48 Oct 3, 2013 8:56 am
• Dkt. 1-2 12/18/15 Page 46 of 67 PagelD# 50 Oct 3, 2013 2:45 am, Jeff wrote:
Scrap Can: This email(s): I cleaned up the area I was assigned per TScott
showed me as my work area so I cleaned up the area throwing away things that I
thought could be trashed and out of my way. I toss a scrap can and TScott began
emailing to me asking about the location the can and the scrap that was in the can.
Tom gives the recycle parts to Nanci for recycling.
Keep looking for the other email DKT Green C
• Dkt. 1-2 12/18/15 Page 5 of 35 PagelD# 764/25/13 12:21pm, 4/25/14 Jeff wrote:,
April 26, 3:38 am, April 26, 2013 2:14 pm.
5th Wheel What Unit It Goes On? This email(s): I was instructed by Tom Scott
to put the 5th wheel on a unit, I received an emailed from TScott that the part was
wrong so I was unable to make the repairs. I then saw that the repairs TScott had
asked me to complete had already been repaired by TScott.
• Dkt. 1-3 12/18/15 Page 13 of 35 PagelD# 84 7/26/2013, July 29, 2013 3:25 am,July 29, 2013 1:44 pm
On 6/06/14 FedEx released a CD to Plaintiff (me) of my 21 plus years as an
employee. The CD does not include all of my information that was reported to
Management over those years.
12
Mark Clatterbuck deliberately incorrectly completed my paper work by stating
that I had NO PREVIOUS DOT EXPERIENCE. I have enclosed a copy of my resume
as proof of my experience in the DOT field.
C.
Areas That Show Falsification of Documents
Manager Mark Clatterbuck intentionally falsified this document to read: NO
PREVIOUS DOT EXPERIENCE
• CD FDX/CORBIN STATION # 317-320, FMCSAJDOT- Covered Employment!
Application History and Agreement to release controlled Substance and Alcohol.
Jan 2, 2014, I called Mark Clatterbuck to ask for more time because my knee
was still bothering me but Clatterbuck denied me more time so on Jan 6, 2014 I
returned back to work and the same harassment, intimidation, hostile working
environment started up again. I was denied the extension because another coworker
was still out on his FMLA and he Manager Mark Clatterbuck explained to me that
the company was in need of my return.
On Jan 28, 2014, I arrived at work to find Clatterbuck there waiting for me he
explained that his boss have some question that need to be answered as we walked
into the shop. I did not understand his questioning so I followed him to the computer,
Clatterbuck sign into the computer and would not allow me to punch in now would
he allow me to look at my time card so that I could follow along and answer his
question by looking at my time card as a reference guide. I was giving a suspension
letter I was told to turn over my ID badge, and fuel card because I was being put on
suspension for failure to open and RO. Manager Mark Clatter said that he needed to
13
investigate some more, I was told that I had to be escorted off the property as Mark
walked me to my car I got in and left the property.
• CD FDX/CORBIN UNEMPLOY #2207 I. 0. M. Investigative Suspension with
Pay
• CD FDX/CORBIN UNEMPLOY #2208 Plaintiff Corbin hand written statement
on Jan 28, 2014
On Jan 31, 2014, Mark Clatterbuck Pre-Decision letter to Chris Riley cc Mary
Davin: I will comment the same comment that I have been commenting and that is,
I did not ask James Jimmy Lassiter to make repairs on the seat belt speaker, marker
lights and clutch. I did not falsify my time card and I did not bully James Jimmy
Lassiter to change his story, they all fabricated their statements.
• Dkt. 1-22 12/18/15 Page 3 of 4 PagelD# 193 Inter Office Memo to EEOC Page 1
• Dkt. 1-22 12/18/15 Page 4 of 4 PagelD# 194 Inter Office Memo to EEOC Page 2
• Dkt. 1-22 12/18/15 Page 2 Of 4 PagelD# 192 Inter Office Memo to EEOC Page 3
Feb 5, 2014 Inter-Office Memorandum Termination
Day/Constructive/Discharge
• Dkt. 1-24 12/18/15 Page 2 of 2 PagelD# 200 Mark Clatterbuck statement of
2/05/2014
• Dkt. 1-23 12/18/15 Page 2 of 4 PagelD# 196 Forced resignation Written by
Jeffrey Corbin
• Dkt. 1-23 12/18/15 Page 3 Of 4 PagelD# 197 Termination/06-31-T Falsification
Co.
• Dkt. 67 03/01/17 page 1 of 4 PagelD# 936 Corbin Statement of 2/5/2014
On July 31, 2014 my Initial Complaint in this case with EEOC involved Forced
Resignation, Harassment, Defamation, Intimidation, Hostile working Environment,
Workplace Bullying.
14
• Dkt. 1-2 12/18/15 Page 67-67 PagelD# 71 Intake Questionnaire with EEOC on
7/31/2014
• Dkt. 1-3 12/18/15 Page 1-35 PagelD# 72 Questions with Answers #5A, #513, #6
and #7 Forced Resignation or be terminated, harassment, slander, conflicts,
bullying and sarcastic comments.
On August 6, 2014 EEOC presented a filed document of my charge of
Discrimination based on Disability and Race. Disability Discrimination violation of
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended; and the Virginia Human Rights
Act, VA code 2.20-3900B et seq., and Racial Discrimination violation of Title VII of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended.
• Dkt. 1-2 12/18/15 Page 21 of 67 PagelD# 25, EEOC Charge of Discrimination
filed Aug 6, 2014
Manager Mark Clatterbuck made several different statement as to how he
discovered that Corbin had sent FedEx Truck # 301876 to a vendor......listed below.
Mark Clatterbuck did not discover that I had sent Asset 301876 to Truck
Refrigeration for repairs it was Tom Scott's email that lead Mark Clatterbuck to
pursue why it was at the repair shop. Asset 301876 was sent to the Repair shop to
have the fairing and body work repaired with an approved Retirement and Repair
email from Manager Mark Clatterbuck.
On September 19, 2015 I received a document from EEOC issuing me a Notice
of Right to Sue that was dated September 16, 2015.
• Dkt. 1-2 flied 12/28/15 Page 17 of 67 PagelD# 21 EEOC Sept 16, 2015 Notice of
Right to Sue
• Dkt. 1-2 filed 12/18/15 Page 13 of 67 PagelD# 17 EEOC Case Log Records
• Dkt. 57-1 filed 01/13/17 Page 40 of 59 PagelD# 836 Envelope from EEOC dated
Sept 16, 2015 arrived on Sept 19, 2015
On September 30, 2014 FedEx's statement to/EEOC forward this to Plaintiff
15
• Dkt. 1-3 flied 12/18/15 Page 34 of 35 Page ID# 105 Section: Termination of
Corbin's Employment
Para. 2 "In late January 2014, Manager Clatterbuck discovered that an outside
vendor was repairing FedEx Truck # 301876...."
• Dkt. 50-2 flied 01/10/17 Page 2 Of 13 PagelD# 688.
Declaration of Mark Clatterbuck answer # 7, On Jan 24, 2014, I discovered
that Plaintiff sent Asset No. 301876 to Truck Refrigeration Repair, one of FedEx's
outside vendors, for repairs without opening a repair order or obtaining my approval.
See Id #802 Clatterbuck never discovered that asset 301876 was at Truck
Refrigeration it was Tom Scott Jan 24, 2014 email that lead Clatterbuck to the shop
having unauthorized repairs done different from what Petitioner Retirement and
Repair request approved by Clatterbuck.
• Dkt. 59 filed 2/16/17 Page 3-19 PagelD# 859. Defendant Reply In Support.
SOF No. 10.
On Jan 24, 2014 Mark Clatterbuck Manager of Fleet Maintenance and
Plaintiffs Supervisor, discovered that Plaintiff sent Asset No. 301876 to Truck
Refrigeration Repair...
• Dkt. 1-22 filed 12/18/15 Page3 of 4 PagelD# 193 Inter-Office Memo Jan 31, 2014.
Para. 1. Mark Clatterbuck admitting that he was notified by Tom Scott EE#
18464 on Friday 1/24/2014 via email (Item 1) regarding a concern with asset 301876.
• Dkt. 57-1 flied 1/13/17 Page 7 of 59 PagelD# 803 Email: Tom Scott emailed
Manager Mark Clatterbuck on Jan 24, 2014 @ 11:09 am to inform Manager Mark
Clatterbuck that Truck # 301876
On Jan 9, 2015, I received an email from Shelia Chesson pertaining to a
Response from Federal Express and in that email Shelia Chesson stated that she was
16
not allowed to send me a copy of this document. I can, however, share their response
with you by phone if you agree not to make it public in any way (i.e. not share it with
any former or current employee; not make it a part of any social media like facebook,
twitter, instagram; not share it with any news media, etc.) You can share it with your
attorney should you acquire one. If you are in agreement with these terms, I can
contact you on Tuesday, January 13, 2015 at 7:00 am at (757) 369-0333, If there is
another number you prefer that I call on that date and time please let me know.
• Dkt.1-2 12/18/15 Page 48 of 67 PagelD# 52 Email from Shelia Chesson Jan 9,
2015 11:27 am
On March 2013 to Oct 2013 and upon my return on Jan 6, 2014 to Jan 28, 2014,
I felt that TScott and MClatterbuck was gunning for me by working together to build
a fake case that would get me termination/constructive discharge by resigning from
my position. Scott and Clatterbuck even went so far as to coerce James Jimmy
Lassiter to fabricate by lying that I had asked him to make repairs on a vehicle, James
'Jimmy' Lassiter even wrote a letter stating that I had bullying and threaten him into
changing his story to say that I had made the repairs on the vehicle when I did not
ask him to change his story nor did I bully or threaten him. The call was simply about
a warranty on the vehicle.
I was more than qualified for this job, I feel that Tom Scott didn't see me as a
capable candidate.
My equal rights were violated and FedEx failed to protect me as disabled black
man. Do I feel that had I been a white man that this would have never happen, "yes
iVI
I do", to the point where I was always having conflicts with Tom Scott from March
18, 2013 to Oct 7, 2013 then after I returned from FMLA knee surgery.
I feel that Scott and Clatterbuck were gunning together along with coercing
James (Jimmy) Lassiter to write a false statement alleging that I had asked him
(Lassiter) to make repairs without a work order. I did not ask James (Jimmy) Lassiter
to repair the clutch, speaker, seat belt and marker lights. I never sent Manager Mark
Clatterbuck a request for the repairs because I was going to make those repairs
myself. My job as a mechanic was to diagnose and troubleshoot in finding problems
and submit to management a Retirement and Repair Request, informing him of the
repairs cost, requesting his approval to have those repairs done. Truck Unit 301876
was in need for a repair in August when I first found that the clutch was going out
and my first request was put in for the tool. I requested this tool again in Sept again
no word from Clatterbuck that I would be getting the tool, by now I realized that my
request for the tool I was asking for was not going to happen, yet I asked again in Oct
before I was, set to go out on FMLA foe knee surgery. I did not inform Manager
Clatterbuck of my intention of having the surgery until after I had talk with I had
requested the tool and got frustrated that Clatterbuck was not supplying me with the
tool I needed yet he wanted all repairs to be one in house and that if not in house that
it was to stay below not the normal by had now been decreased to $500.00 and my
last day of working was the Jan 27, 2014 which is the day the email was sent out Jan
28, 2014 I arrived at work and Manager Mark Clatterbuck was there waiting for me
in the parking lot.
In
My work was checked by co-worker Tom Scott, it is also what lead Clatterbuck
to investigate what Tom Scott so called discovery of truck Unit 301876 was at Truck
Refrigeration without a work order/repair order different from what the initial work
order/repair order sent with unit 301876 Jan 17, 2014 Truck Refrigeration for repairs
that had already been approved by Manager Mark Clatterbuck on Jan 16, 2014. This
same email that Scott sent to Manager Mark Clatterbuck is what lead Clatterbuck
to the investigation, resulting in the Jam 28, 2014 Suspension within a week I was
called to a meeting to which I was told after a thorough investigation I was being
Terminated with an option to resignation, so to save my good name I cowardly
resigned. After I received the information from FOIA on December 4, 2015 and I was
able to view my time card that I had in fact open an RO and that document was
misrepresented to EEOC and Court as work completed when the work done was
diagnosing and troubleshooting.
During the two week together and other especially schedule days were I was
asked to come in because Tom Scott needed a second persons help. Those times
Scott would ask me question on how I would repair certain jobs and he (Tom Scott)
would respond "that's bullshit" to my answers. Nothing was ever to his liking, Mr.
Scott act as if he was my supervisor. I tried to contact my manager thru phone calls
and emails and Human Resources Representatives Mary Davin and other thru
phone calls to make my complaints known but all my contacts were ignored and I
was not taken serious of my complaint so I filed a complaint with EEOC on July 31,
2014.
19
March 18, 2013-Oct 7, 2013 I worked at the Federal Express Norfolk location
shortly after I started working there I felt I was being.
Oct 8, 2013- Jan 3, 2014, I went out to have surgery on my left knee from an
injury I sustained while in the Army in 1990.
Jan 6, 2014-Jan 28, 2014 I returned to work and the same problems I was
having with Tom Scott back in March to Oct of 2013 continued where it left off. Made
every attempt to contact Mark Clatterbuck my manager and Representative Mary
Davin and other from Human Resources over the course of time even including the
time I was out for surgery with 34 calls to Manager Mark Clatterbuck of 148 minutes
and Human Resources of 210 minutes of calls, on one call Mary Davin informed me
that I needed to go through my "chain of command".
March 18, 2013-April 4, 2013 I worked with a coworker name Tom Scott who
made the comment
-.
"it would take someone like you (me) thirty years to learn this stuff"
ARGUMENT
A.
Summary of Argument
I Petitioner lost my job because two men who hated me a black man. Cathy
Walsh made a statement in court out of Texas: Prism and HCMP contains disability
Mark Clatterbuck whether he has work for FedEx since 1997 testimony in court or
Declaration ¶ 3 Clatterbuck never expected to get caught and had no compassion for
his action, Clatterbuck knew what he was doing when he terminated me. Clatterbuck
made a Personal decision not a business decision. Petitioner argument is this case
20
with all the Preponderance of Evidence that Petitioner's Civil Right was violated. The
repair order to this case clearly show that Mark Clatterbuck abused his Managerial
power by siding with Tom Scott to make Petitioner feel Ostracism, which lead to
Petitioner being terminated.
Petitioner demands request that FedEx be held accountable for the perjury
testimony that their witness's fraud up on the Court with information that disability
was not a part of PRISM. See Tiffany Teal v. Federal Express Case #316 cv 02161D. Cathy Walsh made a statement in Court in Texas: Prism and HCMP contains
disability.
Mark Clatterbuck withheld the Repair Order, the information that Clatterbuck
for 6 to 7 years thanked Petitioner for his serviced to this Country, documents that
Clatterbuck knew Petitioner was a Disable Veteran. Clatterbuck fabricated
information he wrote on his Declaration of employment with FedEx since 1977. See
Id #687 ¶ 3. The Transcript Page 268 line 2-4, Transcript Page 295, line 19-25,
Transcript Page 296 line 1-6.
Petitioner before Oct 31 to Nov. 1, 2017 have never seen or heard of a David
Huffer that he can recall. The fact remains that Huffer and FedEx act as though this
Huffer was someone Petitioner could depend on to accommodate his need for the job
is absolutely mind blowing. Each of FedEx witnesses have sat on the witness stand
and out right told the jury lie after lie after lie is an unethical violation of Federal
Law. Huffer testimony is a crime he went all around with the fabrication, then stated
the truth about the PRISM.
21
B.
Supporting Proof for Argument
FedEx Attorney were lied to about Petitioner and with all the other lies that
has been found out in this case, Petitioner has questions of what is truth and what is
a lie. Petitioner was requested to this meeting on the same day that the Termination
Letter was dated because Petitioner was terminated. FedEx filed documents on
8/11/2017 with the Court admitting FedEx TERMINATED Petitioner in February
2014, See Id #1039,
Manager Mark Clatterbuck knew what he was doing when he didn't allow
Petitioner to view his time card on Jan 28, 2014, because Clatterbuck did not want to
be shown the repair order that he accused Petitioner of not opening when Petitioner
time card would have shown that a Repair Order was opened and did exist See Id
#945
Manager Mark Clatterbuck stated in his Declaration that he has been
employed with FedEx since 1977, and he testified on the witness stand that he has
work for FedEx for 19 years, one of these statement is a not true, if Clatterbuck had
worked for FedEx since 1977 to Jan 2017 his retirement, that would put Clatterbuck
at about forty (40) years of employment not 19 years? Somewhere there is perjury
here.
Manager Mark Clatterbuck suspended Petitioner for failure to open an RO
Repair Order on Jan 28, 2014
a. See Id #945 This is the Repair Order Petitioner was accused by FedEx of
not opening. FedEx withheld this document from EEOC during their
22
investigation and withheld from Petitioner until Feb 24, 2014 Telephone
Conference, Judge Krask DIRECTED FedEx to produce the work order also
known as a repair order it was withheld from the case for one thousand one
hundred and eighteen (1,118) days.
5. Feb 5, 2014 Eight days later Petitioner received a phone call of the PreDecision Call results. Petitioner was terminated and a Termination Letter was issued
and when Petitioner asked for other options, Clatterbuck informed Petitioner that
his options were Resign or be Terminated. Clatterbuck also stated that if you
Petitioner fight this you will lose.
6.Petitioner asked for resolutions from the harassment that Petitioner was
receiving from coworker Tom Scott over the period of March 18, until Oct 7, 2013.
The harassment began again when Petitioner returned from FMLA on Jan 6, 2014.
The Suspension was a result of Tom Scott email and coercing Jimmy at Truck
Refrigeration to lie and say that Petitioner had asked him (Jimmy) to make repairs
that Petitioner had not requested for approval.
23
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, the Petition for Writ of Certiorari should be
granted.
+q
JEFFREY P. CORBIN
PETITIONER PRO SE
481 REDDECK ROAD
NEWPORT NEWS, VA 23608
(757) 660-8337
HEYJPAUL@GMAIL.COM
24
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.