Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jeannette A. Suarez, Petitioner v. Anthem, Inc., fka WellPoint
Supreme Court briefDec 20, 2017
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
17-1073
CASE NOT MADE PUBLIC
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Ms. Jeannette A. Suarez-Pro se-Petitioner
V.
ANTHEM, Inc. -Respondent
Title 1-The Americans with Disabilities Act
Title 18- § 241 § 242
Color of Law & Conspiracy Against Rights
The Tenth Circuit Court Of Appeals
Courts and Respondent's Attorneys Intentionally Left Me Homeless
ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Pro se-Plaintiff
Ms. Jeannette Amelie Suarez
18695 Pony Express #2032
Parker, CO 80134
(719) 314-7857
Attorneys for the Defendant-Anthem,Inc
Mr. John Drury
Ms. Danielle Marie Kays
Mr. Christopher DeGroff
Seyfarth Shaw, LLP
233 S. Wacker Drive Suite 800
Chicago, IL 60606
(312) 460-4000
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
Whether under Color Of Law (Code § 242) should Conspire Against the Rights (Code §
241) of the plaintiff by denying her the privilege to a fair trial under the 14th
Amendment, and should the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals have dismissed this case on it
merits based of the of defendants fraudulent magistrates report and recommendation, and
are they exempt from following the "Rule of Law" and should the courts commit Fraud
Upon the Court (Kramer v. Kramer, 96 Nev. 759, 762, 616 P.2d 395, 397 (1980),and plot
with the defendant's attorneys by accepting the Perjured and Fraudulent Declarations
(Code § 1001) in order to grant motion for summary judgment based off of the Spoiled
Magistrate's Report and Recommendation in favor of the defendant fully aware the
plaintiff had Preponderance of Evidence, and could it be possible that "Some" or "All"
of these actors are Corrupt
Whether the Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) and the EEOC "Conspired
Against The Rights,
Whether the Instructor, Manager's and Human Resources at Anthem, Inc
"Conspired Against The Rights"
Whether there are others that the plaintiff in unaware of who"Conspired Against the
Rights" and possibly under "Color of Law."
Table of Context
Petition for Writ Of Certiorari
Questions PresentedRespondent's attorneys names appear on the cover page
Jurisdiction-------------------------------------------------------------------------A
Plaintiff's Motion for Status of Summary Judgment...............B.
Fraudulent Magistrate's Report and Recommendation--------------C
Plaintiffs Statement of Facts--------------------------------------------------D
Defendants Fraudulent and Perjured Declarations--------------------E
District Court Of Colorado Order & Judgment --------------------------F
Tenth Circuit Court Of Appeal Order & Judgement --------------- --- G
Court References ------------------------------------------------------------------- H
District Court of Colorado---------------------------------------------hi
Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals....................................h2
Petition for Rehearing Denied-------------------------------------------------I
Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA)...................................J.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission(EEOC)....................
Statement of the Case...........................................................K
Tenth Circuit- not published ----------------------------------------------- --- L
District Court of Colorado--not published -------------------------------Picture of Plaintiff ------------------------------------------------------------- MReason to Grant this Writ
Conclusion
JURISDICTION
[ ] For cases from federal courts:
The date on which the United States Court of Appeals decided my case
was e-p1er )11be4'
o7
NIA [I No petition for rehearing was timely filed in my case.
"
1AJ
A timely petition for rehearing was denied by the United States Court of
1 7 , and a copy of the
Appeals on the following date: ()CkO bEr I
order denying rehearing appears at Appendix
[1 An extension of time to 419 the petition for a writ of certiorari was granted
f'7 ft
t1/.fY
to and including
(date) on
(date)
in Application No.
The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U. S. C. § 1254(1).
[ ] For cases from state courts:
/0//~
The date on which the highest state court decided my case was
A copy of that decision appears at Appendix
[ ] A timely petition for rehearing was thereafter denied on the following date:
and a copy of the order denying rehearing
appears at Appendix
.
[I An extension of time to file the petition for a writ of certiorari was granted
to and including
(date) on
(date) in
Application No.
A_______
The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U. S. C. § 1257(a).
0.
No-r D
,Jrf
3
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
July 29th, 2013 first day when the class walked in there were pencils, paper,
an erasable whiteboard, stickies, index cards everything a person would need to
take notes. That morning the instructors wanted class to share a little about our
past work history and what we were happy about. I told the class "I am very
thankful to have to job because if I didn't I would be homeless." and after the
introductory meeting I walked over to the instructor to disclose that I have ADHD so
she would understand if I to repeated myself she wouldn't get upset. She told me
that she knew very well how to work with that disability since her son had it and is
on Ritalin.
On the 5th of August 2013 around August 6' on my desk and the entire class had
paper, pencils, highlighters everything needed to take notes.
Around the 71h of August when Ms. Whitehead was in front of the entire class
to and wanted to share that she and her boyfriend enjoyed eating at a restaurant
"Mi Cochina" (which means that your clothes are dirty, saying bad words are
cochina and other meanings) because she mispronounced the restaurant's name it's
"Mi Cocina" (Kitchen) an Hispanic gentleman and I both started laughing (and we
were NOT laughing at her) because Louis (I don't know his last name) and I
understand Spanish we told her the name was Cocina and then the entire class
started to laugh. In front of the class after the correction she had a full blown
childish temper tantrum.
The next day I think it was the 81of August 2013 when she came into the
class all the pencils, paper everything we had to write with had been taken off the
desk and the first words that came out of her mouth as she pointed her hand up in
the air was something like we were no longer allowed to take notes because we were
now the class was now going to learn by listening and she was looking right at me
when she said this. I immediately told her I can't learn that way, I needed to take
notes her response was "well, you are now going to learn a different way and
because I am bipolar I immediately started to cry because I can't learn that way and
I needed my job.
I made the following requests and all were denied —by Ms. Whitehead, Linen,
Artzer
• Printed screenshots-Ms. Linen wanted to give me one the size of an
envelope.
• HIPPA manual to look at-Denied
• Everything I asked for denied and because I am bipolar when I am not
supported I cry and of course since I was never supported I cried every
day causing me to be embarrassed in front of the class because they
didn't know what was going on.
They did nothing but pick on me, I felt sick every day, didn't want to go to
work because I had so much emotional distress, couldn't concentrate; felt helpless,
because I knew that if Ms. Linen was in on this when I got out of training Ms. Linen
would only continue harassing me. Actually it would be Ms. Artzer because the first
week before all of the commotion Ms. Artzer needed two of the people in the new
class to go to her team and I was one of the two she chose, so that right there said
something about me that I had the experience she was looking for and then she got
mean along with the other two. If she had been a good manager she would have put
a stop to what they were doing but she didn't.
Since Ms. Whitehead wouldn't allow the class to take notes, she would write
on an easel pad and then put that paper on the wall, which didn't do me any good
because none of what she wrote made sense. The class was instructed that if they
needed an answer to look at the piece of paper on the wall. One day (again) I was
the only one that didn't pass test and had to stay to make it up. About 20 minutes
before she wanted to leave she stood up and said "Oh, Jeannette, I'm sorry but the
wrong answers are up on the wall" then she got another two sheets she wrote on,
slapped them on the wall cricked so I couldn't read them and didn't give me time to
finish because the 20-minutes were up and she needed to go. Another day I wanted
to retake a test she came back with a sarcastic tone of voice and said "Why you're
not going to pass anyway?" Another day, I wanted to look at a test I had retaken, I
could tell she hadn't even looked at it because there were no marks or grade on it.
I needed a hard copy for Adderall (we got off at 4:30PM) I asked Ms.
Whitehead if I could leave at 4 she said it would be an incident. I just wanted to get
my prescription before my doctors office closed at 5. I was written up the next day
since I missed 4 hours of work because I had to go get my medication
-
Break time I wanted to let Ms. Whitehead know I was going to see Ms. Linen
if I was late coming back. I was walking to see Ms. Linen I turned around and Ms.
Whitehead was following me. I feel in this case she stalked me because it was my
break; she had no right to follow me because it was my time and none of her
business. I was going to beg Ms. Linen to take notes and there is Ms. Whitehead
standing next to me. Ms. Linen threw in that dumping the sugar on me wasn't
funny. And that Ms. Whitehead is a professional trainer if she doesn't want you to
take notes then you can't.
Wanted to retake a test Ms. Whiteheads remarks was "Why you're not going
to pass anyway?" I immediately started crying, I just couldn't understand why she
was so hateful.
Louis (DOE) the other gentleman that corrected Ms. Whitehead she didn't pick on
him or cause him problems
If someone in the class asked her a question she was very kind, and if I did she
looked at me like I was stupid and had a very sarcastic tone in her voice and I got to
the point I didn't ask anything.
A young man in class would bring in free coffee from Starbucks nothing said. I
bring in Donuts (my last day) on the 16" of August and she lied, told management
that in the middle of class I stood up and "announced that I had brought in donuts
using my Food Stamps."
One day I wanted water the room was a bit dark, I saw that there was a Starbucks
cup by the coffee maker. I only wanted to make sure it hadn't been used. I turned it
upside down to check it out sugar fell all over my face, hair, down my shirt and the
entire class laughed. Since there was just a little bit left in the cup I went ahead
and dumped the rest which made the class laugh. So a young man can bring in
coffee nothing said, I bring in donuts and it's a major production.
Another day a young man spilled his coffee or whatever was wet in his cup because
he didn't have a lid on it. The liquid went on the keyboard, surge protector, desk etc,
and Ms. Whitehead jumps up to help him clean the mess and she didn't help me.
I did not see one other person in that class treated like I was being treated. When
we had test, I was the only one that failed (I am only assuming this) but I believe
the rest of the class some had failed but she let them go just to make me look bad.
What happened because of this I lost everything I owned and became homeless,
moved into my car on the 3rd of December 2013 and this past December 3, 2017 I
have been living in my car and still wouldn't be if the District Court of Colorado
would have granted me motion for summary judgment instead granted it to
ANTHEM, Inc
Jeannette Suarez
S
i
I Ve4v4v
-r1Th Cir cvi+ Cori op
wred
A
REASONS FOR GRANTING THIS WRIT
I would like my questions to be answered
CONCLUSION
Since my allegations turned from civil to criminal I would really appreciate it if this court
would be kind enough to provide me an attorney or two.
What has been done to me is a crime against humanity, and sickening.
Respectfully submitted,
its. 9ie~~ Saa&
Ms. Jea ne
Pro-se Plaintiff
elie Suarez
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.