UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Agency decision
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 104963 / March 10, 2026
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-22236
In the Matter of
Rimar Capital USA, Inc., Rimar
Capital, LLC, Itai Royi Liptz, and
Clifford Todd Boro,
Respondents.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
NOTICE OF PROPOSED PLAN OF
DISTRIBUTION AND OPPORTUNITY
FOR COMMENT
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 1103 of the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission’s (the “Commission”) Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans (the
“Commission’s Rules”), 17 C.F.R. § 201.1103, that the Division of Enforcement has submitted
to the Commission a proposed plan of distribution (the “Proposed Plan”) for the distribution of
monies paid in the above-captioned matter.
On October 10, 2024, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Administrative and
Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section
21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Sections 203(e), 203(f) and 203(k) of the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and Section 9(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940,
Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (the
“Order”) 1 against Rimar Capital USA, Inc., Rimar Capital, LLC, Itai Royi Liptz, and Clifford
Todd Boro (collectively, the “Respondents”). In the Order, the Commission found that
Respondents engaged in fraudulent conduct related to an offering of Simple Agreements for
Future Equity (“SAFEs”) in a holding company, Rimar USA, controlled by Liptz. The
Commission also found that Respondents made false and misleading statements about stateregistered investment adviser Rimar LLC, which Liptz also controlled. According to the Order,
between May 2022 and April 2023, Liptz, through Rimar USA, and with the help of Rimar USA
board member Boro, raised nearly $4 million from 45 investors for the development of Rimar
LLC, an adviser that purported to use artificial intelligence to perform automated trading for
advisory client accounts in a range of products including equities, futures, and crypto assets
through a series of misrepresentations about the platform’s features, its assets under
management, its performance, and its supposed artificial intelligence-powered application.
1
Securities Act Rel. No. 11316 (Oct. 10, 2024).
According to the Order, these same misrepresentations were also made to obtain advisory clients,
many of whom became clients after investing in the SAFEs. In addition, the Commission found
that Liptz improperly used some of the SAFE proceeds for personal purposes.
As a result of this conduct, the Commission found that Rimar USA violated Section 17(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; Rimar LLC willfully violated Sections
206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”); Liptz willfully
violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10-b
thereunder, and Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Advisers Act; and Boro violated Sections
17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act. The Commission ordered Liptz to pay $202,604 in
disgorgement and prejudgment interest of $11,007.25 for a total of $213,611.25, with such
payment being deemed satisfied by offsets recorded in July 2024 against capital advances Liptz
previously made to Rimar USA and Rimar LLC. The Commission further ordered Liptz and
Boro to pay a collective total of $310,000 in civil money penalties to the Commission. The
Commission also created a Fair Fund, pursuant to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, so the penalties collected can be distributed to harmed investors (the “Fair Fund”).
The Fair Fu/ nd includes the $310,000 in civil money penalties collected from Liptz and
Boro. The assets of the Fair Fund are subject to the continuing jurisdiction and control of the
Commission. The Fair Fund has been deposited in a Commission-designated account at the U.S.
Department of the Treasury, and any accrued interest will be added to the Fair Fund.
OPPORTUNITY FOR COMMENT
Pursuant to this Notice, all interested persons are advised that they may obtain a copy of
the Plan from the Commission’s public website at
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/fairfundlist.htm. Interested persons may also obtain a written
copy of the Proposed Plan by submitting a written request to Allison J.P. Moon, United States
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-5876. All
persons who desire to comment on the Proposed Plan may submit their comments, in writing, no
later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Notice:
1.
2.
3.
to the Office of the Secretary, United States Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090;
by using the Commission’s Internet comment form
(https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin.shtml); or
by sending an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov.
Comments submitted by email or via the Commission’s website should include “Administrative
Proceeding File No. 3-22236” in the subject line. Comments received will be publicly available.
Persons should submit only information they wish to make publicly available.
2
THE PROPOSED PLAN
The Net Available Fair Fund 2 is comprised of the $310,000 in civil money penalties
collected from the Respondents, plus any interest and income earned thereon, less taxes, fees,
and expenses. The Proposed Plan provides for the distribution of the Net Available Fair Fund to
investors based on their out-of-pocket losses on Simple Agreements for Future Equity of Rimar
USA (“SAFEs” or the “Security”) purchased between May 1, 2022, and April 30, 2023 (the
“Relevant Period”).
For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority. 3
Vanessa A. Countryman
Secretary
All capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the same meanings ascribed to them in the Proposed
Plan.
3
17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(iii).
2
3
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.