SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Agency decision
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHING~ P r '¥I'AQ .
"'.. 4"'.~
l : .'. 'r:"Ultj:" :.....:."t"'....: .""",
(Aot àeWV'1fies
'Act
ot iq33
bect10n ~
..rll ..-..1-..
Febniar 15, 1996
i
!
11~11o
I'"",¡.'f'
,
r¡.'ubl1("
Deçir Registrant:
~YHlr.b1l1ty
\:..d:Ce
FebMrY. i ~r-I .iij tiL~'!t-'~'t""""M
Ths letter is intended to assist investment company registrats in preparg disclosure
filngs. These comments represent the views of the staf of the Division of Investment
Management and are not necessariy those of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
comments in this letter apply to filgs made with the Division, including filgs on Forms
N-IA, N-2, N-14 and S-6.
This letter covers disclosure and procedura developments since February 3, 1995
when the staf issued its last letter to registrats. Accounting-related matters of interest to
registrats and their independent public accountants can be found in a letter dated Novem
ber 2, 1995 from Lawrence A. Friend, Chief Accountant of the Division, addressed to Chief
Financial Officers. Genera guidance to varable anuity, variable lie, and other insurace
company investment contract registrats can be found in a letter dated November 3, 1995
from Brenda D. Snee, Assistat Director, Offce of Insurance Products.
i. PROSPECTUS IMROVENT
In past letters to registrats, the staf has urged registrants to improve fund
prospectuses by makg disclosure more concise, direct, and understandable. Some have
responded by producing prospectuses that are signicantly more user-friendly and readable.
We continue to encourage registrants to review their prospectuses with the goal of
eliinating unnecessary legal terms, jargon, and verbose disclosure. In this regard, the staff
directs registrats' attention to General Instruction G to Form N-1A and Genera Instruction
for Part A: The Prospectus of Form N-2. The inormation in the prospectus should be
clear, concise, and understadable; avoid the use of techncal or legal teriS, complex
language, or excessive deta.
The staf has assisted, and wil continue to assist, registrats who tae the intiative
to review, rewrite, and improve fund prospectuses. Registrants are encouraged to submit
dras of revised prototype prospectuses for review by the staff priOl: to filg.
II. DISCLOSUR COMMNTS
A. Multiple Class Funds
The Commission has adopted Rule 18f-3 under the Investment Company Act of 1940
(the "1940 Act") which permits open-end investment companies to issue multiple classes of
voting stock representing interests in the same portfolio. See Investment Company Act
Release No. 20915 (Februar 23, 1995). In connection with Rule 18f-3, the Commission
adopted amendments to Form N-1A designed to improve disclosure for multiple class funds.
The staff has observed, however, that the disclosure of mutual funds offerig multiple
classes in the same prospectus is, in some cases, neelessly long and complex, makg the
2
differences.
between classes difcult to-understad. Registrts are encouraged to simpli
the de&CfptiQn..of mllltip,le çlas~~~~ements,
')
In addition, Item 24(6) of Form N-1A requires copies of any plan entere into by the
registrat under Rule 18f-3, .
pla amendments, to
includig any implementing agreement and
be filed as' exhbits to the registration statement. A post-effective amendment for the
filg exhbits and agrements pertg to the Rule 18f-3 plan may be filed
Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act"). 1/
purpose of
under Rule 485(b) under the Securities
B. Registration Statements Fied on Form N-14
Form
an
Item 16(12) of Form N-14 requires registrats filg registrtion statements on
N-14 to file as an exhbit to the registrtion statement, or incorporate by reference,
opinon of counselor a copy of an Internal Revenue Service ("
IR ") rulig supportg the
ta matters discussed in the registration st"atement. Opinons or ruligs may be filed either
in the original filg or at effectiveness of the registration statement. .
The sta recognies, however, that the closing of a reorgantion.
usualy is
contingent on the registrat receiving the ta opinon or IR rulig; therefore, the dosing of
the trasaction itself is satisfactory evidence that the ta opinon or rulig wãsobtaed.In
such a circumstace, the sta wil not object if a registrat files the ta opinon or IR
rulig afer the reorganation, if the registrat includes
statement to file, by post-effective amendment, an opinon of counselor a copy of
an undertg in the registration
an
IR
rulig supportg the ta consequences of the proposed reorgantion withi a reasonable
time afer receipt of such opinon or rulig. Such post-effective amendment may be filed
under Rule 485(b) under the 1933 Act.
C. Closed-End Funds' Tender Offers
Closed-end funds often trade at a discount from net asset value. Some closed-end
funds disclose in their prospectuses that, in order to minize or eliinate the discount, they
wil offer to purchase their shares through tender offers or propose to shareholders at a later
date conversions to open-end status.
. Fund boards typicaly have the discretion to decide whether funds should purchase
their shares or propose conversions, and the decisions generay are based on circumstaces
existing at the time the decisions are made. Nevertheless, some prospectuses highlght the
corporate actions to be taen
but tend to minize their conditional nature. For example, a
number of prospectus summaries state the funds' intention to conduct tender offers or
propose conversions without mentionig any conditions or qualying circumslaces. Often,
language appearg much later in the prospectuses quales these commitments and states
that they may be subject to a varety of conditions.
1/ When the Commission adopted amendments to Rule 485 in 1994, it delegated authority to the
Division to determine appropriate uses of Rule 485(b) in contexts other than those
specifically enumerated in the rule. This comment and Comment H.B dealing with Form
. N -14 filings authorize registrants to fie post-effective amendments under Rule 485(b) in
accordance with that authority. See Investment Company Act Release No. 20486 (Aug. 17,
that their post1994). Registrants availng themselves of this procedure should ensure
effective amendments otherwise meet the conditions for filing under Rule 485(b).
?
3
In describing the commitments to conduct tender offers or propose conversions,
registrats nee to convey the possibilty that the corporate actions may not occur.
Discussions of conditions or qualing circumstaces should not be lengthy or overly
techncal. Funds should also review any advertsing or sales literature referrg to
commitments to determine if they ma~ be misleadig to potential investors.
il. PROXIS
A. Proxy .Disclosure Requirements
The. staf has responded to a number of interpretive questions and reviewed proxy
statements filed under the revised disclosure reuirements for fund proxy statements ("the
revised rules"), which became effective in Januar, 1995. Generay, the qualty of
disclosure under the new rules has been good and substatialy improves disclosure that
would have been required under the old rules. We believe, however, that the following
disclosure issues require clarcation.
1. Material Factors Discussion
(4) (approval of
Rule 12b-l plan) of Schedule 14A require a discussion of the materi factors on which the
Items 22(c)(1l) (approval of investment advisory contract) and 22
(d)
board of ditors has based its decision to recommend an investment advisory contrct or
Rule 12b-1 plan for shareholder approval. Whe the revised rules do not dictate the form
or content of the material factors' discussion, the instrctions to the Items state that a mere
list of the factors considered by the board of directors is' not sufficient disclosure. The staf
has given, and wil continue to give, comments on material factors discussions that do not
include a clea, concise explanation of the bases for the directors' recommendation to
shareholders (whether for a new contract or the renewal of an existig contrct). The
discussion should include the material factors underlying the recommendation, the relative
importce or weight of each factor, and how each factor relates to the board's
recommendation. The discussion also is required to reference, if appropriate, whether there
are soft dollar argements that benefit the investment adviser. Registrats should avoid
generaed discussions of brokerage argements that do npt directly address the specifc
soft dollar argements that benefit their investment advisers.
2. Compensation Disclosure
Item 22(b)(6) in Schedule 14A requires proxy statements to include a table disclosing
the amount of compensation paid to fund directors by a fund and, if applicable, the fund
complex. The same compensation disclosure is required in registration statements. The
staf's review of proxy statements (and registration statements) filed under the revised rules
indicates that:
. In some cases, varation from the prescribed format may be necessar to
present the inormation in an understadable maner. Funds may present
inormation in a diferent tabular format if it wil make the compensation
inormation clearer. For example, a fund may var the format of the
compensation table to accommodate a proxy statement that solicits votes from
shareholders of more than one fund. However, al compensation inormation
be provided in the table (or the footnotes to the table) in the section of
the proxy statement discussing the election of directors.
must
4
. No entry'is reuired in the compensation table if a diector did not recive
compensation for service as a diector durig the most recnt fiscal period. In
addition, if there is no reortble inormation for a parcula requir
category (for example, pension or retiement benefits accrued), funds may
omit that column from the compensation table.
B. Electronic Proxy Voting
Rule 14a-4(b)(1) of the proxy rules requires registrts to provide to sharholders, in
the form of proxy, a meas of conferrg authority to vote on specifc matters. The sta
has not objected to proxy solicitation material contag a supplementa method for
shareholders to vote electronicaly by using a telephonic or other electronic voting system, if
specifcàly permitted by applicable state law. In these cases, the registrat:
a) adopted a reasonable meas of veriying the authenticity of proxies trasmitted by
telephone or otherwise (such as including a personal identifcation number on the proxy
cad) ;
b) provided the shareholder an opportnity to valdate an electronic vote to ensure
that the vote was received correctly;
c) determined that the supplementa electronic voting procedures provided for in the
proxy are permissible under applicable state law; and
d) retaed voting records, including the date of receipt of voting instructions and
the name of the recipient.
C. Voting Results
Registrats are remided that the results of a vote of shareholders must be furnshed
in the next annual or semi-annual shareholder report following a shareholder meeting or
other shareholder vote. See Rule 30d-1(b) under the 1940 Act.
IV. FIING PROCEDURS
A. EDGAR Implementation and Fig Procedures
Investment company registrats must fie electronicaly via EDGAR (i) al
registration statements, including amendments, under the 1933 Act and/or the 1940 Act;
(ü) al proxy materials required to be filed with the Commission (except those for which
confidential tr~atment is requested); (il) al reports, includig reports on Form N-SAR and
annual and semi-anual reports to shareholders required to be filed with the Commission
under Section 30 of the 1940 Act; and (iv) al other reports, forms, and schedules required
to be filed by or with respect to investment companes under the Securities Exchange Act of
5
1934 (excet Form 13F). 21 Al correspondence related to electronic filgs also must be
submitted electronicay.
1. Fiancial Data Schedules
Registrts are required to furnsh Financial Data Schedules as exhbits to electronic
filgs, including registrtion statements on Forms S-6, N-1, N-1A, N-2, N-3, N-4, and
N-5; Form N-SAR; and cert proxy materials (as specifed in Item 22(a)(4) of Schedule
14A). 3./ The specifc EDGAR taggig requirements for investment company Financial Data
Schedules are set forth in Appendi E of the EDGAR Filer Manual. M Appendi E should
be read in conjunction with specifc investment company form requirements and Rule 483(e)
under the 1933 Act which set forth the reuirements for the schedules.
2. Paper Copies
Registrats are reminded that Rule 902(g) of Regulation S- T requires electronic filers
to provide a paper copy of their first electronic filg. Ths paper copy is not an offcial
filg, and the legend required by Rule 902(g) should
be placed on the cover page to
indicate that fact. No signatures ar required. A computer pritout of an EDGAR filg is
acceptable, but the confdential access codes must be removed or blaned out. The copy
should be reeived by the Commission no later than six business days afer the electronic
filg and may be maied to the address set forth in Rule 902
(g) .
3. Cover Letters
Where approprite, cover letters relating to a filg should be included as par of the
electronic submission of the relevant filg. Cover letters provide inormation helpful to the
review of the filg, including reuests for selective review. 5./ Cover letters always should
include a typed letterhead, since letters that are "EDGARed" wil not include the letterhead
prited on' firm or company stationery. Also, if they are not included in the letterhead, the
name, address, and telephone number of the registrat's contact person(s) should be
provided in the text of the letter. See Comment I.A of the Februar 22, 1993 Letter to
2/ See Rules 101, 902, and 903 of Regulation S-T (17 CFR Par 232.101, 902 and 903) and
Release 4.40 of the EDGAR Filer Manual (December 1995) and the Appendix thereto (the
"EDGAR FilerManual").
'J/ For circumstances under which this requirement would not be applicable, see Comment I.D
of the Letter to Registrants dated Februar 3, 1995.
1/ See, in paricular, pages E-2 and E-3 ("Filings Processed by the Division of Investment
Management: Investment Company Forms ") and pages E-43 through E-48 ("Investment
Companies, Artcle 6 of Regulation S-X"). The EDGAR document header tag for a document
containing a Financial Data Schedule wil always begin with the characters "EX-27"
regardless of the item number of this exhibit within the relevant registration statement. See
pages C-8 and C-9 of Appendix C of the EDGAR Filer Manual.
S-/ Registrants should note that cover letters submitted under document tye "COVER" and
correspondence submitted under submission and/or document tye "CORRSP" are treated as
non-public and are not disseminated. See the EDGAR Filer Manual, Section E, paragraph
4.12 ("Non-Public and Confidential Informtion ").
6
Registrats for other tyes of inormation that may be appropritely included in cover
letters.
,4. Exendi Effeciveness of Rule 48S(a) Figs
Registrts filg post-effective amendments under Rule 485(b) under the 1933 Act to
extend the. effective date of a post-effective amendment filed pursuat to Rule 485(a) should
485B24E, II or
(i) submit such filgs under EDGAR submission tye "485BPOS, II II
II
485B24F , II as appropriate; and (ü) following accetace of the submission, noti the sta
the Rule 485(b) filg. These proedre
wil be superseded when new EDGAR submission tys designed spifcay for ths
purpose become avaible.
by correspondence ("CORRP" submission) of
s. Avoidig Common Problems
Registrats can avoid many common problems associated with the process of makg
electronic filgs with the Commssion by (i) including the corrt "CIK" number when
makg check or wire payment of filg fees through Mellon Ban, in accordace with
Rule 3a of the Commission's Informal and Other Procedures, and (ü) establishig and using
a CompuServe maibox to receive and carefully review Commssion notices of filg
acceptace or suspension. These notices provide inormation about the type of filg (live,
test, or confirming copy), the date and time of receipt, error messages for suspnde filgs,
and the official filg dates assigned to accepted live filgs.
6. Facing Sheets
Registrats are remided to check the approprite box( es) on the facing sheet of
amendments filed under Rule 485 and to make sure that al submission and document header
tags correspondig to those boxes are prepared correctly.
7. EDGAR Contacts
Apar from questions in the specifc areas enumerated below, registrts generay
should direct their EDGAR questions to their regular processing braches or reviewers, who,
wil provide the answers or, in appropriate cases, refer them to the EDGAR Brach.
Registrats new to the EDGAR filg process, however, should dit their questions to the
EDGAR Brach at 202-942-0591. In addition, questions concerng Regulation S-T and
related EDGAR rules provisions may be directed to either Anthony A. Vertno at 202~942
0591 or Ruth A. Sanders at 202-942-0633.
Financial Data
Schedules
Anthony Evangelista
Asst. Chief Accountat
202-942-0636
Rule 24f-2
Notices
Carolyn Miler
202-942-0510
Form N-SAR
N-SAR Inquir Line
Senior Financial Analyst
202-942-0513
B. Registering Additional Shares under Rule 24f-2
The Commission recntly amended Rule 24f-2 under the 1940 Act to provide that a
Rule 24f-2 Notice is deemed timely filed if the fund establishes that it trsmitted the notice
,,,'
7
to a thid par company or governenta entity that guarte delivery no later than the
filg deadle. QI By providing a meas for funds to ensure that they are not penaled for
the faiure of a thid pary to timely file their Rule 24f-2 Notices, the Commssion expected
the amendments to eliate the nee for funds to seek exemptions from the reuirements of
Rule 24f-2.
Registrats are remided that they must use new Form 24F-2 for fig Rule 24f-2
Notices for periods endig on or afer October 10, 1995. Also, as provided in amended
Rule 24f-2 and new Form 24F-2, registrts caculatig the registration fee due by deducting
the amount of shares reeemed durig the fisca yea from the amount of shars sold durig
the period must include shares issued in connection with dividend reinvestment plans when
determing the amount of shares sold and redeemed.
C. De-Registerig Funds
The staff has noted a number of cases in which funds that have trsferred al of
their assets in a reorgantion subsequently faied to de-register. A registrt whose assets
have been trsferred to another fund and which ceases operations as. an investment
company must file an application pursuant to Section 8(t) and Rule 8f-1 for an order
declarg that the company has ceased to be an investment company. Applications should be
filed on Form N-8F withi a resonable time afer the reorgantion. Registrats also are
reminded to provide, by establishig a reserve accunt or otherwise, for the payment of
costs of the Form N-8F application proceeings and for the prepartion and filg of a fmal
N-SAR on behal of a fund that has ceased operations.
*
*
*
Ths letter is intended to assist registrats in preparg filgs in 1996; it is not
intended to replace the disclosure comment process. You should direct any questions about
specifc company filgs to the sta member responsible for reviewing that company's
documents.
Sincerely,
¡/j lji
. Ii
\(jyw ~ . ~
')
'êAArl(e
¿arolyn B. Lewis
Bar Dl. Miler
Assistat Director
Assistat Director
fl/ Investment Company Act Release No. 21332 (Sept. 1, 1995).
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.