UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Agency decision

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 103625 / August 1, 2025

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-21181

In the Matter of

Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank

PLC,

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPROVING

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

On September 29, 2022, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist

Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21C of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order (the

“Order”) 1 against Barclays PLC (“Barclays”) and Barclays Bank PLC (“Barclays Bank”)

(collectively, the “Respondents”). In the Order, the Commission found that Barclays Bank failed

to put into place any internal control around the real-time tracking of securities being offered or

sold off of its Commission-registered shelf registration statements. As a result of this failure,

between June 26, 2019, and March 9, 2022, Barclays Bank offered and sold an unprecedented

number of securities—cumulatively totaling approximately $17.7 billion—in excess of what it

had registered with the Commission, in violation of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act.

In connection with the over-issuances and internal control failure, Barclays and Barclays Bank

restated their year-end 2021 audited financial statements filed with the Commission.

The Commission ordered the Respondents to pay a $200,000,000 civil money penalty to

the Commission.2 The Commission ordered the funds paid pursuant to the Order be held in an

account at the United States Treasury pending a decision whether the Commission, in its

discretion, would seek to distribute the funds.

On March 30, 2023, the Commission issued an order 3 that created a Fair Fund, pursuant

to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, so the penalty collected can be distributed

to harmed investors (the “Fair Fund”).

Securities Act Rel. No. 11110 (Sept. 29, 2022).

The Commission also ordered Barclays Bank to pay disgorgement of $149,731,011 and prejudgment interest of

$11,463,229, the payment of which was deemed satisfied by Barclays Bank rescission offer.

3

Order Establishing a Fair Fund, Exchange Act Rel. No. 97221 (Mar. 30, 2023).

1

2

The Fair Fund includes the $200,000,000 collected from the Respondents. The assets of

the Fair Fund are subject to the continuing jurisdiction and control of the Commission. The Fair

Fund has been deposited in a Commission-designated account at the U.S. Department of the

Treasury, and any interest accrued will be added to the Fair Fund.

On January 22, 2025, the Commission published a Notice of Proposed Plan of

Distribution and Opportunity for Comment (“Notice”) 4 pursuant to Rule 1103 of the

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans (the “Commission’s Rules”) 5 and

simultaneously posted the Proposed Plan of Distribution (the “Proposed Plan”). The Notice

advised interested persons that they could obtain a copy of the Proposed Plan from the

Commission’s public website or by submitting a written request to Noel Gittens, United States

Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The Notice

also advised that all persons desiring to comment on the Proposed Plan could submit their

comments, in writing, within 30 days of the Notice. The Commission received two comments

during the comment period.

The Proposed Plan provides for the distribution of the Net Available Fair Fund 6 to

investors who purchased or acquired Barclays American Depository Receipts (“ADRs”) traded

on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol BCS and Barclays ordinary shares traded on

the London Stock Exchange under the symbol BARC between June 26, 2019, and March 27,

2022, both dates inclusive, and suffered a loss as calculated in accordance with the Plan of

Allocation attached as Exhibit A to the Proposed Plan.

After considering the two comments, the Commission staff recommends that the

Proposed Plan be approved without modification.

A.

Public Comments on the Proposed Plan

On February 20, 2025, an individual investor who purchased Barclays-issued VXX

exchange-traded notes (“Barclays VXX”), submitted a public comment on the Proposed Plan

stating that in November 2020, he purchased Barclays VXX, which are not included in the

eligible securities in the Proposed Plan. The investor did not demonstrate why the Barclays

VXX should be included as an eligible security in the Proposed Plan.

The Commission considered the investor’s comment and finds that Barclays VXX is not

an eligible security under the Proposed Plan. The Proposed Plan states that artificial inflation in

the price of Barclays ADRs and ordinary shares occurred during the Relevant Period as a result

of Respondents’ violative conduct and thus investors in the ADRs and the ordinary shares were

harmed. Consequently, Barclays ADRs and ordinary shares are the only securities eligible for

recovery under the Proposed Plan. Barclays VXX is neither a Barclays ADR nor an ordinary

share, and thus is not an eligible security under the Proposed Plan. Furthermore, trading or

market losses not tied to the violation are not recognized losses under the Proposed Plan.

Exchange Act Rel. No. 102254 (Jan. 22, 2025).

17 C.F.R. § 201.1103.

6

All capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the same meanings ascribed to them in the Proposed

Plan.

4

5

2

On February 18, 2025, Equilibrium Capital Limited, a U.K. firm that specializes in

providing advice to minority shareholders, submitted a public comment. While its comment

responded primarily to Commissioner Peirce’s public statement on the Proposed Plan and did not

address specific provisions of the Proposed Plan, its comment could be construed as objecting to

the Proposed Plan’s prioritization of investors who traded in the U.S. markets over investors who

invested in non-U.S. markets. Since the Proposed Plan does ultimately compensate investors in

the U.S. and non-U.S. markets, the Commission staff believes the Proposed Plan is fair and

reasonable and concludes no modification of the Proposed Plan is necessary.

B.

Approval of the Proposed Plan

For the reasons stated above, the Commission finds that the Proposed Plan is fair and

reasonable and should be approved without modification.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 1104 of the Commission’s

Rules, that the Proposed Plan is approved, and the approved Plan of Distribution shall be posted

simultaneously with this order on the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov.

7

By the Commission.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary

7

17 C.F.R. § 201.1104.

3

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.