ABOUT THIS REPORT AND DISCLAIMER
Agency decision
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
FISCAL YEAR 2026
Report on
Objectives
ABOUT THIS REPORT AND DISCLAIMER
Section 4(g)(6) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act), 15 U.S.C. § 78d(g)(6), requires the
Investor Advocate to file two reports per year with the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives.1 The two reports are
the mid-year Report on Objectives covering the forthcoming fiscal year (FY) and the end-of-year Report on
Activities covering the preceding fiscal year.
A Report on Objectives is due no later than June 30 of each year, and its purpose is to set forth the
objectives of the Investor Advocate for the following fiscal year.2 A Report on Activities is due no later than
December 31 of each year.3 The Report on Activities describes the activities of the Investor Advocate during
the immediately preceding fiscal year.
Disclaimer: Pursuant to Exchange Act section 4(g)(6)(B)(iii), 15 U.S.C. § 78d(g)(6)(B)(iii), this Report on
Objectives is provided directly to Congress without any prior review or comment from the Commission,
any Commissioner, any other officer or employee of the Commission outside of the Office of the Investor
Advocate (OIAD), or the Office of Management and Budget. This Report on Objectives expresses
solely the views of the Investor Advocate. It does not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission,
the Commissioners, or staff of the Commission, and the Commission disclaims responsibility for this
Report on Objectives and all analyses, findings, and conclusions contained herein.
CONTENTS
MESSAGE FROM THE INVESTOR ADVOCATE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
OBJECTIVES OF THE INVESTOR ADVOCATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
FISCAL YEAR 2026 OBJECTIVES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
SEC Policies and SRO Filings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Investor Engagement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7
Investor Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
MESSAGE FROM THE OMBUDS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
END NOTES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
REPORT ON OBJECTIVES: FISCAL YEAR 2026
|
iii
“
One of the most important ways in
which we fulfill our mission is through our
”
investor research and testing program.
MESSAGE FROM THE
INVESTOR ADVOCATE
THE OFFICE OF THE INVESTOR ADVOCATE
exists to serve the investing public. It is statutorily directed to perform specific enumerated
functions, which, if distilled into the most
essential components, could be summarized as
identifying, analyzing, and responding to the
concerns of investors. The Office of the Investor
Advocate (OIAD) satisfies these requirements, for
example, when we serve as a liaison between the
Commission and a retail investor who may have
a problem with the Commission, when we meet
with investors to listen to their concerns regarding
policies they believe may impede their investing
interests, or when we analyze the impact of new
policy proposals on the opportunities that could
become available to investors.
One of the most important ways in which we fulfill
our mission is through our investor research and
testing program. Our rigorous research augments
other efforts the office conducts to identify and
analyze investor experiences and behavior when
considering an investment. Through this research,
we are able to provide decision makers in the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
and Congress with timely insights regarding
investor preferences, capabilities, and trends
that can inform policymaking. As detailed in
our Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Report on Activities,
OIAD has the capacity to complete complex
research projects that include investor testing and
market data analysis. Our research on registered
index-linked annuities, which was initiated and
published in fiscal year 2023 at the direction of
Congress, was heavily cited by the Commission
in a proposed rulemaking. In addition, our FY
2024 Report on Activities announced the launch
of the Thoughtful Households Relating InVesting
Experiences (THRIVE)
Panel. THRIVE is a
longitudinal, quarterly,
and representative survey
of retail investors that
provides important
information about
current investors. We are
especially enthusiastic
to provide the public
and policymakers with
prompt, actionable
data about how retail
investors are choosing
to navigate recent periods of market volatility.
Through research initiatives like THRIVE and our
investor testing projects, OIAD stands ready to
serve the agency with evidence-based data relevant
to the emerging regulatory agenda.
Investment fraud continues to be a focus of
OIAD. Sadly, as the Office of the Ombuds Report
REPORT ON OBJECTIVES: FISCAL YEAR 2026
|
1
summarizes below, devastating complaints of
financial fraud, often initiated on social media,
have not abated. As the scale of monetary losses
and the impact on human lives continues to grow,
we are encouraged that the collected efforts to
address this investor tragedy are also expanding.
We are encouraged by the new Chairman's remarks
in recent Congressional testimony and during his
swearing in ceremony in which he included among
his priorities work to protect investors from fraud.
I am pleased to submit this Report on Objectives
for Fiscal Year 2026 on behalf of OIAD, and I
welcome any questions from Members of Congress.
Respectfully Submitted,
CRISTINA BEGOÑA MARTIN FIRVIDA
Investor Advocate
2
|
O F F I C E O F T H E I N V E S T O R A D V O C AT E
OBJECTIVES OF THE
INVESTOR ADVOCATE
ASSISTING RETAIL INVESTORS
IDENTIFYING PROBLEMS WITH
FINANCIAL SERVICE PROVIDERS
AND INVESTMENT PRODUCTS
The Investor Advocate is statutorily responsible
for assisting retail investors in resolving significant problems that investors may have with the
Commission or with self-regulatory organizations (SROs).4
To accomplish this objective, and pursuant
to Exchange Act section 4(g)(8), the Investor
Advocate has appointed an Ombuds to act as the
primary liaison between the Commission and retail
investors in resolving problems that retail investors
may have with the Commission or with SROs.5
The Ombuds’ Report is included within this Report
on Objectives.6
IDENTIFYING AREAS IN WHICH
INVESTORS WOULD BENEFIT FROM
REGULATORY CHANGES
The Investor Advocate is statutorily responsible for
identifying areas in which investors would benefit
from changes in the regulations of the Commission
or the rules of SROs.7 This function is met through
direct engagement with investors; investor research
and testing; and legal research and analysis. In
addition, the Investor Advocate also consults
with the Chairman and Commissioners, as well
as Commission staff, and solicits feedback from
other stakeholders who may provide insights into
potential changes to regulations of the Commission
or the rules of SROs for the benefit of investors.
The Investor Advocate is statutorily responsible
for identifying problems that investors have
with financial service providers and investment
products.8 This function is met through direct
engagement with investors; investor research and
testing; and legal research and analysis. In addition,
the Investor Advocate monitors investor inquiries
and complaints, SEC and SRO staff reports,
enforcement actions, and other data to determine
which financial service providers and investment
products may be problematic. The Investor
Advocate identifies these problems in the Report
on Activities filed every December.
ANALYZING THE POTENTIAL IMPACT
ON INVESTORS OF PROPOSED RULES
AND REGULATIONS
The Investor Advocate is statutorily responsible
for analyzing the potential impact on investors
of proposed regulations of the Commission
and proposed rules of SROs on an ongoing
basis.9 In FY 2026, OIAD will review significant
rulemakings of the Commission and SROs
and will communicate with investors and their
representatives to determine the potential impact
of proposed rules. The Investor Advocate may
also direct OIAD’s Office of Investor Research
(OIR) to analyze the potential impact of proposed
REPORT ON OBJECTIVES: FISCAL YEAR 2026
|
3
regulations using investor testing, a role assigned
to the Investor Advocate by the Commission under
the authority provided by section 19(e) of the
Exchange Act.
Commission and/or to Congress changes that will
promote the interests of investors.
PROPOSING APPROPRIATE
CHANGES TO THE COMMISSION
AND TO CONGRESS
Exchange Act section 39 establishes the Investor
Advisory Committee (IAC).11 The purpose of
the Committee is to advise and consult with
the Commission on regulatory priorities, issues
impacting investors, initiatives to protect investors,
and related matters. The Investor Advocate is a
statutory member of the IAC,12 and the office will
continue to provide staff and operational support
to the IAC during FY 2026, as we have been doing
so since 2014.
The Investor Advocate may propose to the
Commission changes in the regulations or orders
of the Commission and to Congress any legislative,
administrative, or personnel changes that may be
appropriate to mitigate problems identified and to
promote the interests of investors.10 As we study
the issues in our SEC Policies and SRO Filings,
as set forth below, we may recommend to the
4
|
O F F I C E O F T H E I N V E S T O R A D V O C AT E
SUPPORTING THE INVESTOR
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
FISCAL YEAR
2026 OBJECTIVES
SEC POLICIES AND SRO FILINGS
As described in the previous section, the
objectives of the Investor Advocate are specifically
prescribed by statute. Among the activities that
the Investor Advocate and the staff of OIAD
undertake to satisfy those objectives, we evaluate
Commission rulemakings and SRO filings.
We communicate regularly with investors and
their representatives and seek their feedback on
investor-focused concerns with proposed and
existing policies and filings. We also research and
test investor behavior and trends in relation to
proposed and existing policies.
In accordance with the statutory functions set
forth in Exchange Act section 4(g)(4), and after
consultation with critical stakeholders, both inside
and outside the Commission, the Investor Advocate
will focus on the following policy objectives during
FY 2026:
Enhancing the Accessibility of Disclosures
for Investors
Disclosure and Investor Testing
China-Based Variable Interest Entities
Private Market Investments in Retirement
Accounts
Evaluating the Potential Impact of SRO Rule
Proposals on Investors
§ Crypto Task Force Requests for Information
Enhancing the Accessibility of
Disclosures for Investors
Many commentators have noted the increasing
length and complexity of the disclosures being
provided under the Commission’s rules and have
raised concerns as to whether material information
is communicated to investors under these rules in
the most effective manner.13 During the upcoming
fiscal year, the Investor Advocate will continue to
advocate for ways to enhance the accessibility to
retail investors of disclosures by public companies,
investment companies, and other regulated entities.
Among other things, the Investor Advocate will
explore different approaches to making required
disclosures more user-friendly and comprehensible
to investors, particularly retail investors, while also
considering the extent to which this may add to the
costs and burdens on issuers and other providers of
disclosure. For example, investors may benefit from
highlighting or simplifying certain information,
streamlining disclosure requirements, and/or
reducing or eliminating repetitive disclosures.
A central aspect of this effort will be ongoing
engagements by the Investor Advocate with retail
investors and other relevant parties to develop a
more thorough understanding of how investors
use this information and to solicit a range of views
on how to improve the effectiveness of the current
disclosure system.
Disclosure and Investor Testing
The Investor Advocate will also continue to
encourage investor research and testing on existing
and proposed disclosures to retail investors. Such
REPORT ON OBJECTIVES: FISCAL YEAR 2026
|
5
testing can help ensure that investors not only
understand the information presented to them
but also help ensure that firms are not required
to provide costly disclosures (or implement costly
disclosure changes) without a corresponding,
quantifiable benefit to investors. Additionally,
investor research and testing data can help ensure
that mandated disclosures present the appropriate
mix of material information to investors at an
optimal point in the decision-making process. The
Commission’s Division of Investment Management,
in particular, has worked closely with the Investor
Advocate to utilize investor research and testing
data in some of their policy deliberations.
China-based Variable Interest Entities
Over the years, the variable interest entity (VIE)
structure has been utilized in a variety of business
contexts, including as a means of facilitating
foreign investment in various countries with
regulatory restrictions. During FY 2026, the
Investor Advocate will focus on the heightened
risks to investors posed by certain VIEs,
particularly U.S.-listed companies based in the
People’s Republic of China (PRC or China) that
utilize the VIE structure.
A number of operating companies in the PRC
that are subject to foreign ownership restrictions
imposed by the PRC government have used the
VIE structure as a workaround to raise capital
from U.S. investors through separate U.S.-listed
companies that have entered into contracts
that provide economic rights, but not equity
ownership, in these operating companies. The
emergence and proliferation of these U.S.-listed
companies implicate a range of investor protection
issues, including concerns over the reliability
of their financial reporting, the quality of their
disclosures, the enforceability of their contractual
arrangements, limitations on shareholder rights,
and the extent of intervention or control by the
PRC government over the Chinese operating
6
|
O F F I C E O F T H E I N V E S T O R A D V O C AT E
companies. In light of the increasing exposure of
U.S. investors to China-based VIEs through these
U.S.-listed companies, the Investor Advocate will
explore and study the investor protection issues
surrounding VIEs during the upcoming fiscal year.
In doing so, the Investor Advocate will endeavor
to elevate concerns regarding China-based VIEs
to the attention of the Commission and relevant
SEC staff.
Private Market Investments in
Retirement Accounts
As part of an ongoing focus on the growth and
evolution of the private markets, the Investor
Advocate will explore some of the issues
surrounding the inclusion of alternative investments, such as private equity and private credit,
in retirement savings plans and their implications
for retail investors. For instance, if more plan
sponsors offer plan participants exposure to private
market investments through target date funds or
managed accounts under defined contribution
plans, there may be risks, as well as benefits,
for retirement savers that include alternative
investments as a component of their retirement
accounts. In our prior reports, we have noted that
the private markets have become an important
avenue for investors seeking greater access to
investment opportunities and an expanded menu
of investment products for portfolio diversification.
At the same time, we have also expressed concerns
about the heightened risks of investing in the
private markets, such as reduced, incomplete, or
unreliable disclosure, limited liquidity, and greater
risk of fraud and/or investment loss. The Investor
Advocate will consider, among other things, the
interplay between the investor protection issues in
this area and the often-complex issues that arise
under the Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974, such as fiduciary duties, when defined
contribution plans offer these investment products.
Evaluating the Potential Impact of
SRO Rule Proposals on Investors
As noted above, the Investor Advocate evaluates
the potential impact on investors of proposed rules
of SROs. Self-regulation of market intermediaries
is a core element of the securities law framework
concerning national exchanges, broker-dealers,
and clearing agencies. These SROs are primarily
responsible for establishing the standards under
which their members conduct business and for
monitoring that conduct; and can do so in ways
that are innovative and fast moving. Due to
potential conflicts of interest in their business
models, however, SEC oversight of the SROs
is an important component—both to instill
public confidence in the securities industry and
to ultimately protect investors. As required by
the statutory mandate, in FY 2026, the Investor
Advocate will continue to communicate with
investors and their representatives to determine
the potential impact of proposed rules of SROs
on investors and consider areas in which investors
could benefit from changes in the proposals.
issuance of two requests for information.15 The
feedback sought by the requests for information
ranges from crypto-lending and staking to custody
solutions to the threshold issue of whether a
particular crypto asset is a security.16 We encourage
investors to take the opportunity to respond to
these requests for information by providing their
feedback on crypto assets to the CTF. We look
forward to considering the insights that investors
have shared with the CTF and the initiatives that
the CTF will undertake based on the feedback it
receives from its requests for information.
INVESTOR ENGAGEMENT
OIAD is statutorily mandated to identify problems
that investors may have, analyze the potential
impacts on investors of rules or regulations, and
make proposals to the Commission to promote
the interests of investors.17 The office performs
engagement functions directly with the American
public, obtaining input from investors required to
fulfill the directives in section 4(g)(4) (B)-(D) of the
Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. 78d(g).
Crypto Task Force Requests
for Information
On January 21, 2025, then Acting Chairman Mark
Uyeda announced the formation of a Crypto Task
Force (CTF) led by Commissioner Hester Peirce.14
The CTF is soliciting public comment with the
One of the primary ways in which OIAD
collects this information and sustains a focus on
investors is through ongoing investor engagement
activities.18 This includes investor-focused
meetings, events, and activities that are designed
FIGURE 1. Phases of Investor Engagement
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
Active listening
Research and
data analysis
Collaboration and
partnerships
Successful results
REPORT ON OBJECTIVES: FISCAL YEAR 2026
|
7
primarily to engage directly with investors and
receive feedback about policy questions, investing
challenges, regulatory policy and rulemaking,
investment products and services, investor issues,
and/or potential misconduct.
The office actively seeks input from a broad range
and variety of investors—including individual
retail investors, smaller and regional investor
groups, non-profits, researchers, public and
private pension funds, and other small and large
money managers—as well as regulatory and law
enforcement counterparts.
Retail investors, and their unique perspectives, are
particularly important to the work of OIAD. We
place special emphasis on individuals and groups
whose views and needs may be less frequently
heard, including those who do not routinely travel
to Washington, DC, to lobby government leaders,
or who do not regularly submit comment letters
to the Commission. The office also solicits and
encourages input from stakeholders with a range of
epistemological perspectives and values.
The goals for our investor engagement are twofold:
Understand investor experiences and
perspectives regarding products, practices,
regulations, rulemakings, and the markets, and
communicate them in a decision-useful context
for Commission leaders and staff; and
§ Advocate for investors’ interests in the
regulatory and rulemaking environments
in a manner consistent with the office’s
statutory mission.
In the coming fiscal year, we plan to sustain
the number of virtual events, which allows the
Commission to hear from more investors, more
often, and will enhance the geographic area
of those we are able to reach. While in-person
events offer unique opportunities to build
8
|
O F F I C E O F T H E I N V E S T O R A D V O C AT E
connections with investors, we feel the benefits
outweigh the downside when conducting virtual
events. Our intention is to expand the opportunities for investors to share their perspectives
while also engaging in good stewardship of the
taxpayer resources with which we are entrusted
to produce meaningful results aligned with our
statutory directives.
Interagency Securities Council
The Interagency Securities Council (ISC)19 is a joint
task force that includes federal, state, and local
regulatory and law enforcement professionals who
meet quarterly to discuss the latest in scams, trends,
frauds, and mitigation strategies, and provides
briefings on emerging and complex topics.
The ISC’s objective is to strengthen the cohesion
between federal, state, and local agencies, enhance
opportunities to collaborate on cases to protect
investors, provide insight and guidance across the
ecosystem for investigators who may not frequently
operate in the securities space, and creates a
forum for unified efforts in combatting financial
fraud. Chaired by the director of the Division of
Enforcement, the OIAD Investor Engagement
Manager envisioned, developed, and leads the
SEC’s efforts on the ISC.
The ISC is limited to law enforcement and
regulatory agencies and includes over 2,000
representatives from more than 250 departments and agencies,20 including federal financial
and law enforcement agencies, state offices of
attorneys general and state police, state securities
regulators, and local police departments and
sheriff’s offices. Members participate in discussions with experts on emerging threats, hear
from investigators conducting and supervising
investigations, and explore case study examples
of agencies employing innovative approaches to
combat financial fraud. The ISC also serves as
an opportunity to connect and share information
with the larger law enforcement community that
less frequently deals with securities law violations,
such as police/sheriff departments and tribal and
military community law enforcement. The ISC
does not make policy recommendations.
In FY 2026, the ISC plans to continue to support
the needs of regulators and law enforcement,
enhancing the SEC’s enforcement capabilities, and
leveraging resources to support the investigation
and prosecution of financial fraud across the
government. Additionally, the ISC will continue
to coordinate with the intelligence and homeland
security communities to protect Americans from
financial fraud originating overseas from transnational organized crime and foreign state actors.
INVESTOR RESEARCH
The Exchange Act directs the Investor Advocate
to, among other things, identify potential
changes to Commission regulations and SRO
rules that would benefit investors, and problems
with financial service providers and investment
products. Pursuant to section 4(g)(3) of the
Exchange Act, the Investor Advocate created
OIR to accomplish these goals.
OIR is a multidisciplinary group of scientists
that use investor testing, surveys, qualitative
interviews, and statistical modeling to study
investment behavior and provide the Commission
and the public with insight into how investors and
other stakeholders interact with the investment
marketplace. OIR provides research support to
Commission offices and divisions seeking objective
information about investors and responds to
Congressional mandates for investor testing.21 OIR
utilizes section 19(e) and (f) of the Securities Act of
1933 to conduct investor testing programs that the
Commission determines to be in the public interest
or that would protect investors. OIAD summarizes
OIR’s activities annually pursuant to section 4(g) (6)
of the Exchange Act in its Report on Activities for
the fiscal year.22
OIR directs and maintains a nationally representative survey panel of U.S. retail investors known
as THRIVE. THRIVE consists of quarterly longitudinal surveys (inviting the same people over time)
and custom testing projects that are the agency’s
primary research tool for understanding retail
investors. Longitudinal surveys are a cost-effective
and efficient method for evaluating key investor
developments and identifying emerging investor
issues. THRIVE surveys can reveal changes in
individual behavior over time, information that
is critical to understanding investor activity and
promoting policy efficacy. THRIVE provides
infrastructure that allows OIAD to quickly respond
to policymakers’ needs by reducing the cost
and time required to collect data to inform the
Commission and Congress. In the upcoming fiscal
year, OIR intends to continue to manage THRIVE,
and to publish research on investor preferences
around electronic disclosures. In addition to the
publication of THRIVE data, OIR’s research has
been published in journals including the Journal
of Economic Behavior & Organization and the
Financial Services Review and has been cited by
rulemaking divisions in their work.
REPORT ON OBJECTIVES: FISCAL YEAR 2026
|
9
“
As the SEC and other federal agencies work
toward the goals of the new Administration,
our dedication to protecting American retail
investors remains unwavering.
”
MESSAGE FROM
THE OMBUDS
IN JANUARY OF THIS YEAR, I was honored to
accept a temporary appointment to the position
of Acting Ombuds. In this role, my primary
objective is to continue enhancing the services
offered to investors, building upon the efforts of
my predecessor, Stacy Puente. As the SEC and
other federal agencies work toward the goals of the
new Administration, our dedication to protecting
American retail investors remains unwavering.
Each day, the attorneys in the Office of the
Ombuds have the privilege of addressing the
concerns of America’s investors. We are here to
address concerns related to SEC and SRO actions,
regulations, and policies, but our work often goes
beyond the abstract. The issues that reach the
Office of the Ombuds are frequently deeply
personal, involving the loss of life savings due to
fraud or the impact on a financial professional’s
career following an SEC enforcement action.
Although we may not always be able to fully
resolve the issues brought to our office due to
constraints on disclosing nonpublic information or
providing legal opinions, our respect and
appreciation for the individuals who take the time
to speak with us cannot be overstated. These
conversations form the foundation of our
recommendations to the Investor Advocate, which
are then shared with the Commission. They also
enable us to identify, address, and resolve problems
within the SEC and its SROs.
Reflecting on the work of the Office of the
Ombuds during the Reporting Period, it is evident
that the American public continues to have faith
in the potential of our
capital markets to
enhance our lives and
secure our futures. Each
dollar invested symbolizes
the American Dream
of a brighter tomorrow
for ourselves and our
loved ones. Regardless
of market fluctuations,
investors rely on and
expect the SEC to
safeguard the markets
and their investments.
However, it is also apparent that bad actors
are increasingly exploiting the complexity
of our markets to deceive and manipulate
nonprofessional investors. A particularly
concerning trend in the complaints reported
to the Office of the Ombuds involves cases
where investors made decisions based on
public information that had been intentionally
REPORT ON OBJECTIVES: FISCAL YEAR 2026
|
11
misrepresented by these bad actors. In addressing
these complaints, the Office of the Ombuds has
prioritized educating investors on how to access
and comprehend the essential information needed
for informed investment decisions. We have
also collaborated closely with colleagues across
the SEC to elevate reports of potential fraud or
misconduct, exchange questions, and oversee
efforts to improve the presentation and delivery
of information.
I look forward to continuing to serve the retail
investing public in this role, and I express my
gratitude to my colleagues across the SEC for their
openness and enthusiasm in addressing matters
brought to their attention by the Office of the
Ombuds. Above all, I extend my heartfelt thanks to
the staff of the Office of the Ombuds, the Investor
Advocate, and the rest of my colleagues in the
Office of the Investor Advocate for their steadfast
dedication to our nation’s investors.
In conclusion, I am pleased to observe that the
American Dream remains vibrant. However, as this
report highlights, too many Americans have been
ensnared in the nightmare of fraud.
Respectfully Submitted,
LISA A. SKRZYCKI
Acting Ombuds
12
|
O F F I C E O F T H E I N V E S T O R A D V O C AT E
WHO WE ARE
The Exchange Act requires the Investor Advocate
to appoint an Ombudsman (Ombuds)23 to act as
a liaison for retail investors to relay their concerns
and questions about the Commission and the
SROs the Commission oversees.24 The staff of the
Office of the Ombuds consists of an experienced
team of lawyers, each with differing subject matter
expertise, all dedicated to providing personalized,
tailored assistance to the retail investors that
contact the Ombuds for help. Through direct
engagement with investors, relevant parties within
the Commission, and external stakeholders
committed to investor protection issues, the
Office of the Ombuds fulfills its statutory duty to
help retail investors resolve issues relating to the
Commission or SROs.
Among other statutory duties, the Ombuds must
submit biannual reports to Congress describing
the work of the Office of the Ombuds and its
effectiveness in assisting retail investors.25 This
Ombuds’ Report provides a look back on the
Ombuds’ activities for the six-month period
of October 1, 2024, through March 31, 2025
(Reporting Period), and discusses the Ombuds’
objectives and outlook for FY 2026.
investors to present questions to the Investor
Advocate regarding compliance with the
securities laws; and
§ establish safeguards to maintain the
confidentiality of communications between
retail investors and the Ombuds.26
HOW WE HELP
Our overarching responsibility is to assist retail
investors by resolving concerns, questions, and
complaints about the SEC and the SROs subject
to SEC oversight. We accomplish this in several
ways—most commonly by conducting research,
providing information, making referrals, and
collaborating with other divisions, offices, and
SROs about complaints that impact investor
interests. We submit credible allegations of
securities violations to the Division of Examinations and the Division of Enforcement for potential
examination or investigation, sometimes thwarting
fraud before it occurs. We study and report on
issues of widespread impact to retail investors.
Last, we inform the Investor Advocate and other
interested parties within the Commission about
trending investor protection concerns and areas of
potential reform.
WHAT WE DO
Figure 2 illustrates the process by which we receive
and assist investors with their requests.
As noted above, the Ombuds is required by
statute to:
HOW TO CONTACT US
act as a liaison between the Commission and
any retail investor in resolving problems that
retail investors may have with the Commission
or with self-regulatory organizations;
review and make recommendations regarding
policies and procedures that encourage
Our primary means of communication with
the public is through the Ombudsman Matter
Management System (OMMS), an online portal
for receiving, responding to, and managing data
submitted to the Ombuds. The public can also
contact us by email, telephone, and regular mail.
REPORT ON OBJECTIVES: FISCAL YEAR 2026
|
13
FIGURE 2. Ombuds Process: Review, Research, Resolve
Review
The Ombuds team reviews
all incoming investor
correspondence to determine if
and how we may assist.
Research
The Ombuds team identifies the nature of
the issue, conducts tailored research, and
engages with appropriate personnel within
the Commission or SROs to gather relevant
information.
Resolve
The Ombuds team works to
resolve investor questions and
complaints by providing investors
with requested information and
access to additional resources, by
escalating certain matters through
appropriate channels, when necessary,
and by monitoring outcomes.
INVESTOR VOICES, BY THE NUMBERS
The Office of the Ombuds maintains
records in OMMS of all submissions
and responses handled by our staff.
Matters are assigned a label or
“Primary Issue Category,” reflecting the nature of
the issues raised in the submission. The 12 Primary
Issue Categories can be defined as follows:
1. Allegations of Securities Law Violations:
Investor alleges that an individual, firm, or
entity has violated or is violating the U.S.
securities laws.
14
|
O F F I C E O F T H E I N V E S T O R A D V O C AT E
2. Atypical Matters: Matters of undetermined or
harassing nature.
3. FINRA Complaints/Questions/Procedures:
Questions or complaints relating to the
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(FINRA), a FINRA employee, or about FINRA
rules, policies, or procedures.
4. Inquiries about Corporate Disclosure/
Registration: Questions about SEC filings and
other matters relating to corporate disclosure.
5. Investment Products—Questions/Complaints:
Questions or complaints about a specific type
of investment product.
6. Investor Account Matters: Questions or
complaints relating to a retail investor’s
personal investments or finances.
During the Reporting Period (October 1, 2024 –
March 31, 2025), the Office of the Ombuds
received and processed 1,240 matters submitted
by U.S. and foreign investors, market participants,
and other interested members of the public. These
numbers reflect a slight decrease in the number
of novel submissions received in the first half of
7. Non-SEC/Other Matters: Questions or
complaints about issues that do not fall
within the SEC’s jurisdiction.
FIGURE 3. Matters by Primary Issue Category,
October 1, 2024 – March 31, 2025
8. Other SEC Questions/Complaints: Questions
or complaints about the SEC, including its
policies, procedures, rules, and employees.
9. Other SRO Complaints/Questions/
Procedures: Questions or complaints relating
to the policies, procedures, or rules of an SRO
other than FINRA.
12%
15%
10%
7%
17%
6%
10. Potential Organized Campaign: Submission
appears to be part of a coordinated effort by
multiple individuals to contact the Office of the
Ombuds about the same issue.
11. SEC Investigations/Litigation/Enforcement
Actions: Questions or complaints about SEC
investigations, litigation, or other related issues,
such as distributions.
4%
22%
2%
0.48%
3%
1.5%
Allegations of Securities Law Violations (213)
Atypical Matters (121)
Inquiries about Corporate Disclosure/
Registration (19)
FINRA Complaints/Questions/Procedures (37)
12. SEC/Other Impersonators: Complaints
about SEC or SRO impersonators, and
complaints involving fraudulent use of the
SEC or SRO seal.
Investor Account Matters (274)
Investment Products—Questions/Complaints (70)
Non-SEC/Other Matters (143)
SEC Investigations/Litigation/Enforcement
Actions (89)
SEC/Other Impersonators (53)
In tracking investor submissions by volume and
by Primary Issue Category, OMMS may serve as
an early warning system, identifying existing or
potential concerns for retail investors.
Other SEC Questions/Complaints (192)
Other SRO Complaints/Questions/Procedures (23)
Potential Organized Campaign (6)
Total 1,240
REPORT ON OBJECTIVES: FISCAL YEAR 2026
|
15
FY 2025 as compared to the figures reported in
FY 2024. Matters counted in prior reports and
reopened during the Reporting Period are not
reflected in these figures. Figure 3 illustrates the
number of matters divided into 12 Primary Issue
Categories, which are used to classify the nature of
the submission.
While the number of novel submissions decreased
in this Reporting Period, the Office of the Ombuds
made approximately 1,920 follow-up emails,
phone calls, and other forms of correspondence
to resolve the 1,240 matters received during the
Reporting Period and reopened matters identified
in prior reports. This results in a combined total
of 3,160 contacts with or on behalf of submitters
from October 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025.
FIGURE 4. Contacts by Primary Issue Category,
October 1, 2024 – March 31, 2024
16%
9%
8%
20%
7%
5%
3%
26%
2%
2%
2%
0.3%
0.1%
Figure 4 details the number of follow-up contacts
with the public, separated by Primary Issue
Category. The data shows the reported number of
fraud schemes involving securities and digital assets
continues to increase, continuing a trend identified
in prior reports. Strikingly, our data shows a
142 percent increase in reports primarily involving
allegations of securities fraud violations, which
may be a result of increased public awareness of
the Office of the Ombuds. The increase in fraud
generally comports with recent data released by the
U.S. Federal Trade Commission, which found that
consumers reported losing more than $5.7 billion
in investment scams in 2024—reflecting a
24 percent increase over the collective amount lost
to investment scams in 2023.27 The data also shows
a 51 percent increase in the number of matters
primarily reporting SEC and other impersonators
targeting investors. The Office of the Ombuds
found these submitters were generally targeted
in connection with previous investment scams;
accordingly, this figure likely underreports the
prevalence of impersonators where securities fraud
is the primary complaint.
16
|
O F F I C E O F T H E I N V E S T O R A D V O C AT E
Allegations of Securities Law Violations (387)
Atypical Matters (39)
Inquiries about Corporate Disclosure/
Registration (36)
FINRA Complaints/Questions/Procedures (60)
Investor Account Matters (497)
Investment Products—Questions/Complaints (90)
Non-SEC/Other Matters (179)
SEC Investigations/Litigation/Enforcement
Actions (159)
SEC/Other Impersonators (126)
Other SEC Questions/Complaints (305)
Other SRO Complaints/Questions/Procedures (34)
Potential Organized Campaign (6)
SEC Questions/Complaints (2)
Total 1,920
Endnotes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Exchange Act § 4(g)(6), 15 U.S.C. § 78d(g)(6).
Exchange Act § 4(g)(6)(A)(i), 15 U.S.C. § 78d(g)(6)(A)
(i).
Exchange Act § 4(g)(6)(B)(i), 15 U.S.C. § 78d(g)(6)(B)
(i).
Exchange Act § 4(g)(4)(A), 15 U.S.C. § 78d(g)(4)(A).
Exchange Act § 4(g)(8)(A), 15 U.S.C. § 78d(g)(8)(A).
Exchange Act § 4(g)(8)(D), 15 U.S.C. § 78d(g)(8)(D).
Exchange Act § 4(g)(4)(B), 15 U.S.C. § 78d(g)(4)(B).
Exchange Act § 4(g)(4)(C), 15 U.S.C. § 78d(g)(4)(C).
Exchange Act § 4(g)(4)(D), 15 U.S.C. § 78d(g)(4)(D).
Exchange Act § 4(g)(4)(E), 15 U.S.C. § 78d(g)(4)(E).
Exchange Act § 39, 15 U.S.C. § 78pp.
Exchange Act § 39(b)(1)(A), 15 U.S.C. § 78pp(b)(1)
(A).
See, e.g., SEC, Report on Review of Disclosure
Requirements in Regulation S-K (Dec. 20, 2013),
https://www.sec.gov/news/studies/2013/reg-skdisclosure-requirements-review.pdf (discussion of public
commenters’ views); SEC, Concept Release on Business
and Financial Disclosure Required by Regulation S-K,
Release No. 33-10064 (Apr. 13, 2016), 81 Fed. Reg.
23915 (Apr. 22, 2016), https://www.sec.gov/files/
rules/concept/2016/33-10064.pdf; SEC, Report on
Modernization and Simplification of Regulation S-K
(Nov. 23, 2016), https://www.sec.gov/reportspubs/
sec-fast-act-report-2016.pdf.
Press Release, SEC, SEC Crypto 2.0: Acting Chairman
Uyeda Announces Formation of New Crypto Task
Force (Jan. 21, 2025), https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/
press-releases/2025-30.
Hester Peirce, Commissioner, SEC, Statement, The
Journey Begins (Feb. 4, 2025), https://www.sec.
gov/newsroom/speeches-statements/peirce-journeybegins-020425; Hester Peirce, Commissioner, SEC,
Statement, There Must Be Some Way Out of Here (Feb.
21, 2025), https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/speechesstatements/peirce-statement-rfi-022125.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Id.
Exchange Act § 4(g)(4), 15 U.S.C. § 78d(g)(4).
Securities and Exchange Commission’s Fiscal Year
2024 Congressional Budget Justification, https://www.
sec.gov/files/fy-2024-congressional-budget-justification_
final-3-10.pdf#page=117 (last visited May 1, 2025).
See Press Release, SEC, SEC Launches Interagency
Securities Council to Coordinate Enforcement Efforts
Across Federal, State, and Local Agencies (July
19, 2024), https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/2024-86.
As of May 31, 2025.
See, e.g., U.S. House of Representatives, Consolidated
Appropriations Act, H.R. 2617, Pub. L. No. 117-328,
136 Stat. 5529 (2022), https://www.congress.gov/
bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2617 (Sec. 101(b)(2)(B)
directing the Commission to conduct investor testing
on registered index linked annuities).
See, e.g., SEC Office of the Investor Advocate, Report
on Activities, Fiscal Year 2024 (Dec. 12, 2024), https://
www.sec.gov/files/fy24-oiad-sar-activities-report.pdf.
Exchange Act Section 4(g)(8)(A), 15 U.S.C. § 78d(g)(8)
(A)
Exchange Act Section 4(g)(8)(B)(i), 15 U.S.C. § 78d(g)
(8)(B)(i).
Exchange Act Section 4(g)(8)(D), 15 U.S.C. § 78d(g)(8)
(D).
Exchange Act Section 4(g)(8)(B), 15 U.S.C. § 78d(g)
(8)(B).
Federal Trade Commission, New FTC Data Show
a Big Jump in Reported Losses to Fraud to $12.5
Billion in 2024 (Mar. 10, 2025), https://www.ftc.gov/
news-events/news/press-releases/2025/03/new-ftcdata-show-big-jump-reported-losses-fraud-125billion-2024.
REPORT ON OBJECTIVES: FISCAL YEAR 2026
|
17
This page intentionally left blank.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.