SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20549

DIVISION OF

INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT

January 18,2008

David J. Harris

Dechert LLP

1774 I Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20006-2401

Re:

HSBC Investor Funds-HSBC

Investor Money Market Fund (File No. 8 11-04782)

Dear Mr. Harris:

Your letter of January 9,2008 requests our assurance that we would not recommend that

the Commission take any enforcement action under Sections 17(a)', 17(d12and 12(d)(3): of the

Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "Act") if HSBC Investor Funds (the "Trust"), of which

HSBC Investor Money Market Fund (the "Fund") is a series, and HSBC Group Investment

Businesses Limited ("ISGB") enter into the arrangement summarized below and more fully

described in the letter. ISGB is under common control with the Fund's investment adviser,

HSBC Investments USA, Inc. ("ISUS"), because both are controlled by the same parent, HSBC

Holdings plc.

The Fund is a series of an open-end management investment company that is registered

with the Commission under the Act. The Fund is a money market fund that seeks to maintain a

stable net asset value per share of $1.OO and uses the amortized cost method of valuation in

1

Section 17(a)(l) generally makes it unlawful for any affiliated person of a registered investment

company, or an affiliated person of such person, acting as principal, to knowingly sell any

security or other property to the registered investment company.

2

Section 17(d) generally makes it unlawful for any affiliated person of a registered investment

company, or any affiliated person of such a person, acting as principal to effect any transaction in

which the registered investment company is a joint or joint and several participant with such

person in contravention of rules and regulations adopted by the Commission.

3

Section 12(d)(3) generally makes it unlawful for any registered investment company to acquire

any security issued by, or any interest in the business of, any broker-dealer, any person engaged

in the business of underwriting, or an investment adviser of an investment company, or an

investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

valuing its portfolio securities as permitted by rule 2a-7 under the Act. You state that the Fund

holds notes (the "Notes") issued by structured investment vehicles identified in Appendix A to

your letter. You state that one of the Notes is no longer an Eligible Security as defined in rule 2a7 under the Act. You state further that ISUS is concerned that, due to current conditions in the

credit markets with respect to structured investment vehicles, one or more of the other Notes may

be downgraded and cease to qualify as an Eligible Security or may otherwise decline in value.

You state that in order to mitigate any negative impact on the Fund's shareholders, ISGB

and the Trust, on behalf of the Fund, seek to enter into an Indemnification Agreement (the

"Agreement"), a form of which was provided to the staff. You represent that:

(i)

ISBG would be obligated to provide a capital contribution to the Fund if, as a

result of losses realized on the Notes (whether fi-om a sale or failure by an issuer

to make payment when due), the market-based per share net asset value ("NAV")

of the Fund would drop below $0.9975;

(ii)

the amount of any capital contribution would be that necessary to maintain the

Fund's NAV at $0.9975, subject to an aggregate maximum specified in the

Agreement;

(iii)

the Agreement would be entered into at no cost to the Fund, and ISGB would not

obtain any shares fi-om the Fund for its contribution;

(iv)

the Board of Trustees of the Fund (the "Board"), including a majority of the

trustees who are not "interested persons" as that term is defined in section

2(a)(19) of the Act, has determined that ISGB's commitment under the

Agreement is of comparable quality to a First Tier Security under rule 2a-7 of the

Act and that the Agreement presents minimal credit risks;

(v)

the Agreement would terminate earlier than the specified termination date if the

Board determines that ISGB's commitment under the Agreement is no longer of

comparable quality to a First Tier Security, unless ISGB obtains a letter of credit

or other credit enhancement of comparable quality to a First Tier Security within

five days;

(vi)

if ISGB is unable to obtain a letter of credit or other credit enhancement or if on

the termination date the Fund holds any Notes the sale of which at that time at the

value determined without regard to the Agreement would trigger a capital

contribution under the Agreement, the Fund would sell the Notes and ISGB would

be obligated to make any capital contributions required under the Agreement as a

result of such sale; and

(vii)

the Board has approved the Agreement and determined that entering into the

Agreement is in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders.

On the basis of the facts and representations in your letter, we will not recommend

enforcement action under Sections 17(a)(l), 17(d) and 12(d)(3) of the Act if ISGB and the Trust,

on behalf of the Fund, enter into the arrangement summarized above and more hlly described in

your letter.4 You should note that any different facts or representations might require a different

conclusion. Moreover, this response expresses the Division's position on enforcement action

only and does not express any legal conclusions on the issues presented.5

We have considered your request for confidential treatment of your letter and ow

response for a period of 120 days from the date of our response. We have determined that your

request is reasonable and appropriate under 17 CFR 200.81(b). Accordingly, your letter and our

response will not be made public until May 16,2008.

Very truly yours,

Dalia Osman Blass

Senior Counsel

4

This letter confirms oral no-action relief provided by the undersigned to David J. Harris on

January 10,2008.

5

"The Division of Investment Management generally permits third parties to rely on no-action or

interpretive letters to the extent that the third party's facts and circumstances are substantially

similar to those described in the underlying request for a no-action or interpretive letter."

Investment Company Act Release No. 22587 (Mar. 27,1997) n. 20. In light of the very factspecific nature of the Fund's request, however, the position expressed in this letter applies only

to the entities seeking relief, and no other entity may rely on this position. Other funds facing

similar legal issues should contact the staff of the Division about the availability of no-action

relief.

1775 1 Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20006-2401

+ I 202 261 3300 Main

+ I 202 261 3333 Fax

www.dechert.com

Dechert

LL P

DAVID J. HARRIS

david.harris@dechert.com

+I

202 261 3385 Direct

+ I 202 261 3085 Fax

January 9,2008

FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED

By Email and Overnight Delivery

Robert E. Plaze, Esq.

Associate Director

Division of Investment Management

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:

Request for No-Action Assurance under Section 17(a), 17(d) and 12(d)(3) of the

Investment Company Act of 1940

Dear Mr. Plaze:

We are writing on behalf of HSBC Investor Funds ("Trust"), an investment company

registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended ("1940 Act"), of which

HSBC Investor Money Market Fund (the "Fund) is a series, to seek your assurance that the staff

of the Division of Investment Management ("Staff7) will not recommend enforcement action

under Section 17(a), 17(d) or 12(d)(3) of the 1940 Act and the rules thereunder if the Trust, on

behalf of the Fund, enters into an Indemnification Agreement (in the form provided to you), in the

circumstances described below, with HSBC Group Investment Businesses Limited ("ISGB").

ISGB is under common control with the Fund's investment adviser, HSBC Investments USA,

Inc. ("ISUS") because both are controlled by the same parent, HSBC Holdings plc.

The Fund is a money market fund that seeks to maintain a stable net asset value per share

of $1 .OO and uses the amortized cost method of valuing its portfolio securities pursuant to Rule

2a-7 under the 1940 Act. The Fund currently holds in its portfolio notes issued by certain

structured investment vehicles ("SIVs") in the amounts listed in Appendix A ("~otes")'. The

I

The term Notes as used herein shall also include any securities or other instruments

received in exchange for, or as a replacement for, the assets specified in Appendix A

Austin Boston Charlotte Hartford New York Newport Beach Philadelphia Princeton San Francisco Silicon Valley Washington DC

Brussels London Luxembourg Munich Paris

Dechert

LLP

credit rating of one of the SIVs, Stanfield Victoria, was recently downgraded by Moody's, and

accordingly, the Stanfield Victoria Notes are no longer Eligible Securities under Rule 2a-7. The

Board of Trustees of the Fund, including a majority of the trustees that are not interested persons

of the Fund ("Independent Trustees"), has determined that it is in the best interests of the Fund

and its shareholders not to dispose of the Stanfield Victoria Notes at t h s time. ISUS is also

concerned that, due to current conditions in the credit markets with respect to SIVs, one or more

of the other Notes may be downgraded and cease to qualify as Eligible Securities or may

otherwise decline in value.

In order to mitigate any negative impact such events may have on shareholders of the

Fund, although under no obligation to do so, ISGB and the Trust, on behalf of the Fund, have

determined to enter into the Indemnification Agreement. Under the Indemnification Agreement,

ISGB would be obligated to provide a capital contribution to the Fund if, as a result of losses

realized on the Notes (whether from a sale or failure by an issuer to make payment when due), the

market-based per share net asset value of the Fund would otherwise drop below $0.9975. The

amount of any such capital contribution will be that necessary to maintain the Fund's marketbased net asset value per share at $0.9975, subject to an aggregate maximum set forth in the

Indemnification Agreement. ISGB will not receive any compensation from the Fund for entering

into the Indemnification Agreement or any Fund shares for its capital contribution. ISGB does

not have its own credit rating, but the Board of Trustees of the Fund has determined that ISGB's

commitment under the Indemnification Agreement is of comparable quality to a First Tier Rated

Security under Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act and that the Indemnification Agreement presents

minimal credit risks.

The Indemnification Agreement is expected to remain in place until June 24, 2008, but

would be terminated earlier if the Board of Trustees determines that ISGB's commitment under

the Indemnity Agreement is no longer of comparable quality to a First Tier Rated Security. In

such event, unless ISGB were to obtain a letter of credit or other credit enhancement of

comparable quality to a First Tier Rated Security within five days, the Fund would sell the Notes

and ISGB would be obligated to make any capital contributions required under the

Indemnification Agreement as a result of such sale. Similarly, if, on June 24, 2008, the Fund

holds any Notes the sale of which at that time at the value determined without regard to the

Indemnification Agreement would trigger a capital contribution under the Indemnification

Agreement, the Fund will sell such Notes prior to termination of the Indemnification Agreement.

hereto as a result of an exchange offer, debt restructuring, reorganization or similar

transaction pursuant to which such assets are exchanged for, or replaced with, new

securities of the issuer or a third party.

Dechert

LLP

The Board of Trustees, including a majority of the Independent Trustees has approved the

terms of the Indemnification Agreement, including the aggregate maximum capital contribution

amount under the Indemnification Agreement, and determined that entering into the

Indemnification Agreement is in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders.

Analysis

ISGB is an "affiliated person of an affiliated person" under Section 2(a)(3) of the 1940

Act because it and ISUS, the Fund's investment adviser, are both ultimately controlled by the

same parent, HSBC Holdings plc.

The Indemnification Agreement may be subject to Section 17(a)(l) of the 1940 Act,

which makes it unlawful for any affiliated person of a registered investment company (or any

affiliated person of such person) acting as principal knowingly to sell any security or other

property to the investment company. While Rule 17a-9 provides an exemption for the purchase

of certain securities from a money market fund by an affiliate, this exemption is only available if

the security at issue is no longer an "eligible security" as defined under Rule 2a-7. Currently, the

Notes are classified as "eligible securities" for purposes of Rule 2a-7.

The proposed Indemnification Agreement may also fall within Section 17(d) of the 1940

Act, which makes it unlawful for any affiliated person (or any affiliated person of such person) of

a registered investment company to effect any transaction in which such registered investment

company is a joint, or joint and several participant, with such person in contravention of rules

adopted by the Commission.

Entering into the proposed Indemnification Agreement also may be subject to Section

12(d)(3) of the 1940 Act, which makes it unlawful for a registered investment company to

purchase or otherwise acquire any security issued by or any other interest in the business of any

person who acts as a broker, dealer or registered investment adviser. The Fund could not rely

upon the exemption provided under Rule 12d3-1 because the exemption does not extend to

affiliated persons of the Fund's investment adviser.

By entering into the proposed Indemnification Agreement, ISGB may be considered to

have violated Section 17(a)(l), 17(d) or 12(d)(3).

We submit that, notwithstanding the potential violations, entering the Indemnification

Agreement is in the best interest of the Fund and its shareholders. The Indemnification

Agreement effectively insulates the Fund and its shareholders from the risk that losses arising

Dechert

LLP

from the Fund's current exposure to the SIVs might cause the Fund to "break the buck." The

Staff has previously recognized that entering into a capital support agreement with an affiliate

may be appropriate in certain situations to avoid potential loss to shareholders. See, e.g., SEI

Daily Income Trust-Prime Obligation Fund (November 9, 2007). The capital support

agreement in SEI Daily Income Trust-Prime Obligation Fund operates in essentially the same

fashon as the Indemnification Agreement. In SEI Daily Income Trust-Prime Obligation Fund,

the fund and its affiliate entered into capital support agreement that would prevent any losses

realized on the notes from causing the fund's market based net asset value per share to fall below

$0.995. The capital support agreement obligated the affiliate to make a contribution to the fund

up to the maximum specified in the capital support agreement. Furthermore, the affiliate would

not obtain any shares or other consideration from the fund for its contribution.

Similarly, the Indemnification Agreement will be entered into by the Trust, on behalf of

the Fund, and ISGB in an effort to prevent any losses realized on the Notes from causing the

Fund's market-based net asset value per share to fall below $0.9975. The Indemnification

Agreement obligates ISGB to make a contribution to the Fund up to the maximum specified in

the Indemnification Agreement. ISGB would not obtain any shares or other consideration from

the Fund for its contribution.

Based upon the foregoing, we would appreciate your confirming to us that the Staff will

not recommend enforcement action if the Trust enters into the Indemnification Agreement with

ISGB.

Please be advised that, in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act and Section

200.81(b) of the SEC7srules, we respectfully request that this letter, the related materials and the

Commission's response be granted confidential treatment for up to 120 days from the date of the

response. The information about the proposed Indemnification Agreement is not yet public and

premature disclosure may harm the Fund and ISGB.

Please contact the undersigned at 202.261.3385 should you have any questions or

comments regarding this request.

Sincerely,

LL),~

[ (

David J. harris

Dechert

LLP

Appendix A to No-Action Request

Issuer

Maturity

Principal Amount

Stanfield Victoria

01/25/08

$21,000,000

Whistlejacket

01/28/08

100,000,000

Stanfield Victoria

03/03/08

40,000,000

Whistlejacket

05115/08

50,000,000

K2 USA LLC

06113/08

80,000,000

Links

06/20/08

100,000,000

K2 USA LLC

06/20/08

50,000,000

Whistlejacket

06/23/08

75,000,000

Stanfield Victoria

07115/08

42,000,000

Total

Total percent of Fund

Net Assets as of

December 3 1,2007

$558,000,000

7.3%