OF THE OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL
Agency decision
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
RESPONSE
DIVISION
OF THE OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL
OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
[Pub. Avail.: Oct. 8, 1996]
Our Ref No 96-259-CC
Pilgrim America Group Inc
File No 132-3
Your letter of May20 1996 requests 4ur assurance that we
would
to qhe Commission under
not recommend enforcement action
section
15a of the Investment Company Act of 1940 the
Act
if Pilgrim .Ameri4a Group Inc
pledges all of the outtanding voting
securities of its wholly owned subsidiary Pilgrim America
without obtaining approval of new
Investments Inc
contracts by the shareholders of the Pilgrim America
advisory
Group of Funds the
Investment
Company
Pilgrim AmericaTM
PAl
Funds
PAl serves as investment adviser to the Funds
Pilgrim
America and its affiliates have entered into
credit agreement
the Credit Agreement with First Bank Ntional Association
the
under which the Bank will loan funds to Pilgrim
America and its affiliates
for the loan
1/
As co11atexal
the Pledge
Pilgrim America will pursuant to
pledge agreement
Agreement pledge to the Bank all of the outstanding voting
with the Pledge
securities of PAl
You state that in accordance
Agreement the Bank would take possession of the certificates
PAls voting securities in order to perfect the
representing
Banks security interest in those securities You also state
however that Pilgrim America would retain all voting and other
rights with respect to the securities and the Pledge Agreement
would give the Bank no authority to take part in or influence
the management
of PAl or the Funds
Bank
Section 15a
of the Investment
Company Act states that
an investment advisory contract with
registred investment
for its automatic termination
company must provide in substance
in the event of its assignment
Section
of the
Investment
Company Act defines assignment to include
any
direct or indirect transfer or hypothecation
of
contract
or
chose in action by the assignor or of
controlling block of the
assignors outstanding voting securities by
security holder of
2a
The proceeds of the Credit Agreement will be used
other purposes
to finance the distribution of certain
shares of certain open-end Funds
You
2/
America
among
classes
state that the Pledge Agreement provides that Pilgrim
must not exercise or refrain from exercising any voting
rights if such action could reasonably be expected to have
material
adverse effect on the value of PAls securities
See
infra note
of
-2Rule 2a-6 under the Investment
the-assignor
Company Act
safe harbor from the definition of assignment for
provides
that does not result in
change of actual
any transaction
control or management
of the investment adviser to an investment
company
You maintain that Pilgrim Americas pledge of PAls
securities should not be considered
of
hypothecation
within
block of voting securities
the meaning of
controlling
result
in
section
and thus should not
an assignment
You also
triggering the application of section 15
maintain
if
the
is
considered
hypothecation
that even
pledge
of voting
the
is
not
securities
an assignment under rule
pledge
2a-6 because
it will not result
in any change
of actual
control
of PAl
or management
In enacting
the Investment
Company Act
Congress
found that the national public interest and the
specifically
interest of investors are adversely affected
when
control or
is
without
of investment companies
transferred
management
their
Section
was
the
consent of
15a
security holders 3/
intended to prevent such trafficking in investment advisory
contracts
Consistent with the purpose of section 15a
section
includes in the definition of assignment
transfers or hypothecations of
controlling block of the
transactions
that presumably would
assignors voting securities
transfer to another person the ability to control or manage an
investment adviser
2a
To
determine whether
there has been
transfer or
block
of
securities
for purposes
hypothecation
controlling
of section
it is necessary to look to section
of
the Investment
defines
the
control as
Company Act ./ which
ability to exercise
controlling influence over the management
or policies of
company and presumes such control when
person
owns more than 25s of
beneficially
companys voting securities
The definition of assignment in section
does not
include
in
however
fl changes
control but only those involving
the
transfer or hypothecation
of
controlling block of voting
of
2a
2a
2a
Section
./
declaration
1b
of
of
the
Investment
Company Act
findings
and
policy
3580 before
of the Senate Comm on
Hearings
on
Subcornm
and
76th
3d
Sess
253
Banking
1940 statement
Currency
Cong
of David
Schenker
4/
See
See Dean Witter
also Wiliheim
cert
denied
382
Discover
Co
pub avail Feb
Murchison
342
F.2d
U.S
840
1965
33
37-39
2d
1993
Cir
-3securities
in determining
The relevant inquiry then
6/
is
there has been such
transfer or hypothecation
the
result of the
transferee or pledgee has as
sufficient voting
interest to enable
transaction assumed
or
person to exercise the ability to direct the management
policies of the adviser 1/
whether
whether
In
the
transactiondescribed
letter
in your
the
pledge
the
of
PAls securities is not accompanied by the right to vote those
shares 8/
transfer of voting
In the absence of
rights
pledge of securities ordinarily cannot be
within the meaning of section
assignment
considered
2a
an
Based on the facts
and representations in your letter
particularly your representations that Pilgrim America would
retain all voting and other rights with respect to the
securities and that the Pledge Agreement would give the Bank no
of PAl or
the management
authority to take part in or influence
the
Funds we would not recommend that the Commission take any
enforcement
action under section 15a if Pilgrim America pledges
Wiliheim
Murchison
342
F.2d at
40
This analysis is consistent with the legislative history of
the transfer or
the Investment
Company Act because without
of such
hypothecation
voting interest the abuses Congress
cannot occur
sought to prevent through section 15a
that the provision of the Pledge Agreement
right
Pilgrim America must not exercise any voting
manner as to have
material adverse effect on the
PAls voting securities will not limit significantly
Pilgrim Americas voting rights because it generally will be in
Pilgrim Americas best interests not to take any actions that
You also
would
adversely affect the value of PAls securities
state that although under the Pledge Agreement the Bank has the
default to cause the
right at any time even in the absence of
certificates
PAls voting securities to be
representing
transferred
of record into the name of the Bank or its nominee
this would not affect any of the rights retained by Pilgrim
America with respect to those securities
../
You
assert
providi.ig
in such
value
of
that
the Bank would have
the
In the
event of
default however
right under the Pledge Agreement to sell the securities of PAT
that the Bank holds as collateral
and could exercise all voting
The default would result
rights with respect to the securities
therefore in an assignment of PAls investment advisory
contracts
within the meaning of section
9/
-4PAI..s
securities without obtaining shareholder approval
You should note that different facts or representations might
different conclusion
require
Aot JaM
Sarah
WagntÆn
Attorney
10/
See
Management
Funds
Inc
Corporation
pub avail Aug 12
pub avail Sept
Because
we do not consider the pledge
within the meaning of section
assignment
it necessary
to analyze your request under
1976 Wall
1974
to
Street
constitute
we
rule
2a-6
do
an
not
find
LAW OFFICES
477
MADISON
OF
DECHERT PRICE
AVENUE
RHOADS
TEN
NEW YORK NY 10022-5891
212
1500
AUANTIC TOWER
ARCH STREET
4000 BELL
1717
PA
P1-IILAEELPHIA
POST
N.W
STREET
617
DC 20005-1208
WASHINGTON
90
19103-2793
TELEPHONE
202
626-3300
PRINCETON
PA
STATE
FAX 202
17101-1603
HOUSE
SQUARE
LOUISE
BELGIUM
32-2 S35-5411
1050
BRUSSELS
626-3334
237-2000
TITMUSS
SAINER
DECHERT
SERJEANTS INN
LONDON EC4Y 1LT ENGLAND
CORPORATE
CENTER
P.O BOX 5218
PRINCETON
NJ 08543-5218
609 520-3200
PIKE
583-5353
44-171
151
BOULEVARD
HAU5SMMN
PARIS FRANCE
33-1 53 83 84 70
75008
2a4 and 15a
Sections
of the
Investment
Company Act
1940 and Rule
May 20
Jack
Associate
Murphy
of
2a-6 thereunder
1996
Director and
Chief Counsel
Division
of
450
Investment
and Exchange
Securities
D.C
Re
Dear
Management
Commission
N.W
Fifth Street
Washington
20549
Advisory Contracts
of Investment
Assignment
Mr Murphy
On behalf
Investments
America
Inc
Group
of
America
Pilgrim
Investment
the
Funds the
of
Group
Manager
Inc
Pilgrim
and the
America
investment
Pilgrim
companies
in
America
the
Funds we are writing to seek assurance that the
Pilgrim
staff
of
The open-end
Funds currently consist of Pilgrim America MagnaCap Fund Pilgrim
America High Yield Fund Pilgrim Government Securities Income Fund Inc Pilgrim
America Masters Asia-Pacific Equity Fund Pilgrim America Masters MidCap Value
Fund
and
as the
Open-End
Pilgrim
MagnaCap
Pilgrim
Value
SOIffl-f
728-7100
AVENUE
65
NORTH THIJW SflEEf
HARRISBURG
717
SQUARE
HARTFORD Cr 06103-3702
860 524-3999
215 994-4000
il-IIRTY
OFFICE
BOSTON MA 02109-4603
326-3500
Fund
America Masters
Funds
are
each
America Masters
Fund
and
Pilgrim
LargeCap Value Fund collectively referred to
Pilgrim America High Yield Fund and Pilgrim America
series
of
Asia-Pacific
Pilgrim
Equity
America Masters
America
Investment
Funds
Inc and
Fund Pilgrim America Masters MidCap
LargeCap Value
Fund
are
each
series
of
continued..
Jack
Murphy Esq
May 20
1996
Page2
the
of Investment
Division
Commission under Section
if
in
America pledges
Pilgrim
connection
National
Credit
in
credit
enforcement
action
to the
15a of the Investment Company Act of 1940 the 1940 Act
of the
all
securities
outstanding voting
agreement and
certain
of the Investment
agreements between
related
Manager
Bank
First
the Bank and Pilgrim America dated as of April 28 1995 the
Agreement The proieeds of the Credit Agreement will be used among other
Association
to
finance
the
distribution
of
certain
the
Pilgrim
America Group
of
Funds the
purposes
funds
with
not recommend
would
Management
classes
of
shares
each
of
of
the
open-end
organized
as
Delaware
Funds
Open-End
Introduction
America
Pilgrim
and
corporations
investment
Investment
the
The Investment
Manager
Manager
are
as investment
serves
each
of the Funds
to each
manager
the Investment
Management
The Investment Management Agreements for Pilgrim America MagnaCap
Agreements
Fund Pilgrim America High Yield Fund and Pilgrim Government Securities Income Fund
to
pursuant
management
agreements
Inc
the Elite Series were approved
by shareholders of each of the Elite Series funds at
held
1995
The
Investment
on April
meetings
Management
Agreement for Pilgrim
America Masters
and
Pilgrim
Asia-Pacific
th Masters
of
America Masters MidCap Value Fund
Fund the Masters Series was approved
Pilgrim
LargeCap Value
sole shareholder of each
by the
Fund
Equity
America Masters
funds by written
Series
on June
consent
27
1995
The Investment
turn
owned
the
company
services
business
Investment
of
the
America
of
Pilgrim
Distributor
Pilgrim
Group
Management
of
of which
Through
primarily
Manager
close
wholly owned
is
subsidiary
shares
Express America
as
Manager
wholly owned
is
began
the
management
serving
America
the
Investment
Distributor
to
Inc
affiliates
Corporation
1995
the
and distribution
the
subsidiary
in
Manager
and
Corporation
of investment
with
Funds of certain
Acquisition
of Pilgrim
the
Pilgrim
Prior
publicly
the
in
in
System
financial
companies
The
of the Elite Series
funds
acquisition
America
of the
to
which
National Market
for each
connection
Manager
Open-End
NASDAQ
America
Express America engages
as Investment
on April
its
traded on the
subsidiaries
its
business
and
Express
are
of Pilgrim
subsidiary
America Holdings
Securities
Inc
of the
former
Acquisition
Pilgrim
as investment
adviser
assets
the
Group Inc served
by Express
...continued
America Masters
Pilgrim
Pilgrim
Series Inc
America Group of Funds are
Bank and Thrift Fund Inc
America
Funds
The
closed-end
investment
companies in the
Pilgrim America Prime Rate Trust and Pilgrim
collectively
referred
to
as
the
Closed-End
Jack
Murphy Esq
20
May
1996
Page3
Funds
to the
not
each
and
6c-10
Fund has implemented
Bank whereby the Bank
sale of certain
the
America
Pilgrim
Investment
and
Management
no-action
and
the
the
that
purpose
to cause
default
nominee
although
the
would
not
Pilgrim
Manager
respect
refrain
from exercising
any voting
adverse
on the
Under
offered
sold
the
subject
front-end
In
that
security
Open-end
Class
to
the
agreement
this
right at
Pilgrim
15a
Section
this
voting
would
to the
Bank
for the
for purposes
of the
any
time
even in the absence
name of the Bank
voting
could
reasonably
systems
America
must
three
sales charge
and Class
also
not
have
to
with
or
to have
material
shares are
of
shares are
Class
shares
on Class
or
rights
or any
classes
of
exercise
be expected
securities
Manager
imposed
respect
other consensual
America
that
with
rights
but Pilgrim
front-end
and
by
with
securities
all
pricing
than
Agreements
Board of
the
securities
and
multi-class
less
the
under
the
Pilgrim Americas
sold
is
of
America would submit
of
action
with
Manager
Management
of the
of record into the
Investment
of the
America
securities
an assignment
Agreements
Manager
deferred sales charge
that
Bank
if
rights
are
any
retain
securities
value
contingent
sales charge
regard
will
Funds
shares
affect
agreement
Bank would merely hold the
loan
Pilgrim America
interest in
the
lending
for the
to be transferred
Investment
effect
the
collateral
has
the
issue
this
security
the
the Investment
that Pilgrim
the
of the Credit
of
pledge
accordance
the
financing
terms for Pilgrim
Investment
Management
Fund in
Investment
the
The Bank
to
material
as
Banks
America
securities
the
Pledge Agreement
certificates
compliance
pledge of all of the
to
pursuant
Funds and
the
views on
staffs
the
this
regarding
structure
each
of
Manager
Uniform Commercial Code.3
the
negotiation
the
might be deemed
this
between
Investment
representing
of perfecting
the
has not yet pledged
Pilgrim America agreed
Investment
certificates
Agreement with
favorable
most
Bank
of the
shareholders
terms of the
the
of the
Credit
the
During
Manager
the
provide
of concern
new
Bank and
the
Under
these
options
Investment
the
Agreements
request seeking
securities
its
various
consent
of
approval
require
Consequently
sole
the
into
entered
2a4 An assignment would terminate
Directors/Trustees
deliver
of
because
Manager
Investment
Section
with
system
among other things that Pilgrim Americas
would
Agreement
Pledge
have
Funds shares
Open-End
securities
voting
in
pricing
funds to be used for among other purposes
considered
and concluded
arrangements
outstanding
parties
multiple-class
1940 Act.2
the
affiliates
its
lend
will
classes of the
the
Agreement
under
18f-3
America and
Pilgrim
are
Corporation
other
Each Open-End
with Rules
and Pilgrim Management
Inc
America Investments
Pilgrim
with
affiliated
are
sold
with
shares
entered
into
related
Jack
Murphy Esq
May 20
1996
Page4
The Pledge Agreement
thereof
part
solely to protect
does
Agreement
interest in the
its
not
Investment
Manager
Managers
voting
to exercise
any other
In the
and
therefore
securities
event
Bank
the
grant
influence
of
authority
of the
Funds
to take
of default and does
the
the
certain
are
The Pledge
of the
management
Investment
the
in
rights
not grant
Bank any
the
of the Investment
or control
Bank would have
Bank
securities
in
part
no voting
confers
over the management
default
conferred on the
Manager
any
absence
the
in
the powers
states that
collateral
rights as specified
right
Manager
Credit
the
in
Agreement and the Pledge Agreement including the right to sell the Investment Manager
seurities
and to exercise all voting rights with respect to these securities
Our request for
no-action
default
of title
relief
Investment
Investment
Manager
securities
Act and
in
the
event
any
from
particular
Funds
or interpretive
However
the
promulgated
staff
of the
Commissions
multiple
class pricing
the
to issue guidance
recent
adoption
it
structures
with
below we believe
its
no-response
policy
of
Rules
and
would
c-1O
that
no longer
of Rule 2a-6
will
it
this
and
the
be extremely useful to the mutual
is
not the
that
in
type
light
proliferation
of
fund industry
for
issue
to this specific
respect
securities
We also believe
18f-3
the
Bank
Managers
regarding the application
requests
as discussed
1940
the
received
Presumably
of policy
matter
as
that
position
Fund
the
Investment
of shareholders of the
be deemed
2a4 of
each
unless
upon
rights
by the Bank
would
presumably
Agreements
Board and shareholders
its
its
or retention
Agreements under Section
to the
no-action
transaction
default
respect
its
exercises
securities
these
with
rights
announced
has
staff
of issue for which
staff
terminate
voting
prior approval
to routine
respond
would
after
Bank
the
Manager
Management
of this assignment
exercise
The
to
this
approval
would not
Investment
of the
which
prior to
period
sale of the
to the
without
the
to
In addition any
an assignment
prior
limited
is
Discussion
15a sets
Section
contract
advisory
investment
event
advisory
of its
assignment
of the
assignors
Pilgrim
Manager
the
registered
contract
could
is
contract
for
defined
in
Section
in
action
securities
by
its
in
automatic
2a4
by the
every investment
15a4 states that an
Section
company
substance
in
or chose
outstanding voting
Manager
Nevertheless
we believe
for purposes
of Section
in
investment
must be included
as
termination in the
any direct or indirect
assignor or of
controlling
holder of the
assignor
security
Americas pledge of all of the outstanding voting securities of the Investment
be deemed
of
block of the voting
securities of
hypothecation
controlling
Investment
not result
of
that
provisions
must provide
Assignment
or hypothecation
transfer
block
with
forth certain
any
change
and
that
thus
the
could
proposed
15a4 Since
of actual
result
in
an assignment
transaction
should
pledging the stock
control
or
management
under
Section
15a4
not be deemed an assignment
of the
of the
Investment
Investment
Manager
would
Manager
this
Jack
Murphy Esq
May 20
1996
Page5
pledge
would fall
Finally
the
proposed
Rule 2a-6 provides
of actual
control
not an assignment
time
certain
such
2a-6
not
investment
to
staff
engage
indicates
control
of corporate
statement
the
the
Pledge
block
within
investment
in
company
recognition
of voting
in
engage
which
--
of the adviser.4
management
the
structure
in
could
company
controlling
an assignment
as
in
the
may be
securities
Rule
Absent
the
meaning
advisory
contract
2a-6
of Section
with
the
that
the
Manager
Manager
as
controlling
the
the
structure
could
adviser
structure
--
Rule be Jimited solely to modifications
the
would
Rule
Rule
the
in
adcpting
constitute
was designed
to
release
that
an assignment
would be read
the
is
influence
not
to
include
this
encompass
more
terms
in
change
of actual
control
Under
would
merely
hold
voting
securities
result
Bank
for the
defined
loan and would
in
over the
Section
the
not have
2a9 of
management
the
Company Act Rel No
10809
Aug
1979
Re No
11005
Jan
1980
Company Act
of
of
company
proposing Rule
at
the
the
any control over the
1940 Act as the power
or policies
Id
Investment
would
structure
collateral
Control
investment
Commissions statement
the
demonstrating that
pledge would
Agreement
of corporate
of corporate
modifications
particularly
intend
an
that
and therefore
Manager
modifications
release
would not result in any
Rule 2a-6 primarily was intended
Although
addressed
that
securities
InvestmenL
of the
proposing
--
Moreover
further
the
Investment
pledge of the voting
management
of corporate
Investment
exercise
2a-6 was adopted
corporate
receiver
Investment
to
or
control
to
or management
Commission was concerned
that
modifications
the
or
proposed
Commission did not
actual
that
Further
of
control
automatically
transactions
type of transaction
than
of
positions
structure
transferring
indicates
indirect transfer
safe harbor of Rule
the
certain
that
the
no-action
Commissions
in
of
might be viewed
that
squarely within
codify
modifications
actual
to an investment
adviser
Rule
to an investment
adviser
not result
company.5
actual
in
the
terminating
We believe
fall
direct or
affect
15a4
of Section
particularly
transaction
2a4 thereby
change
--
to involve
would
but which
Of
For Purposes
does
that
transaction
investment
of the
or management
that
things
time an investment
transactions
considered
other
among
for purposes
to
An Assignment
15a4
Section
that
15a
Section
that
concerns
policy
Not Be Deemed
of Stock Should
The Pledge
is
of the
not raise any
would
pledge
Act
1940
the
by Rule 2a-6 under
provided
to address
was designed
change
the safe harbor
within
squarely
The
2a-6
Murphy Esq
Jack
1996
20
May
Page6
most important aspect of determining corporate control is the ability to elect
Since the Bank will have no voting rights with respect to the Investment
Manager
to
prior
and
default
shareholder approval
Investment
refrain
in
adverse
This
meaningful
any
Manager
way
would
is
it
voting
best
on
the
default
the
Bank
material
adverse
in
absence
of
respect
to
value
does
not limit
Investment
the
America not
of the
or
to haye
any material
or
provision
interests of Pilgrim
effect
have
securities
and
with
rights
any contrQl
be expected
reasonably
Manager
loan documentation
also in the
without
over the
America must not exercise
Pilgrim
Investment
of the
Americas
Pilgrim
since
securities
that
rights
as having
securities
default
after
rights
Bank
could
action
this
if
standard
is
generally
Agreement
the Pledge
on the value
effect
voting
to regard the
difficult
from exercising any voting
thereof
actions
Under
Manager.7
material
part
would be
exercise
not
will
generally
it
directors
to take
Investment
any
Manager
securities
In
Pledge
addition
stated
to
to
Agreement
Investment
in
would
The
owns
person generally
beneficially
share
the
shares
secured
party
collateral
that
official
10
of
right
control
under
is
the
Commission
the
or management
2a9 supports
this
view
to control
securities
company
of the
if
of directors
Thus
apparent
Under
that
company
2a42 of the 1940 Act as
person
Voting
that
security
as Congress
recognized
not sufficient to presume the existence
of control
to vote
for the
from
election
of directors
ownership of voting
of the Uniform Commercial Code
has
the
the
secured
to dispose
the
of
this
the voting
election
under
policies
with
presumed
the
of the
Unif
obligations
see Unif
Comm Code
collateral
becomes
Unif
security
debtors
of the
right to dispose
U.LA 61 1992
pledge of the
Section
or
consistent
is
is
comment
the
control
transferring
Our request
of
satisfy
right
above
actual
in
collateral to
The
Funds
indicated
that
results
Article
pledged to it but
1992
upon
ownership
carry the
presumption
management
As
Section
in
for the
to vote
right
significant
unless
defined
is
generally
provides the
the
found
control
ability
the
an assignment.6
more than 25%
security
even
2a-6
2a9
Section
in
of
of the
for Rule
constitute
presumption
any
no
have
will
over
influence
therefore
release
adopting
receiver
exercise
and
Manager
the
the
Furthermore
securities
does
not
ownership
own
interest
Comm Code
9-101
3B
U.LA
9-5011
effective
Comm Code
upon default not
9-5011 3B U.L.A 10
1992
note
not
to
advisers
and accompanying
recommend
and/or
agreements
the
principal
without
investment
text
enforcement
action
underwriters
further
advisers
above
to
the
one instance however
Commission if certain
staff
the
continued
interestholder
and principal
In
vote
to perform
even
underwriters
though
under
the
was subject
agreed
investment
their respective
parent company
to
state
of
insurance
continued..
Jack
Murphy Esq
May 20
1996
Page7
of securities
transfer
that
powers
would have
able
Commission to
by the
attempt
are
that
well
within
Granting
the
requested
this
area
enforcement
action
if
collateral
connection
in
in
On
shares
owner
of the shares
shares
As in our case
interest
in
also
two
occasions
the
the
the
retained
adviser
rights
were transferred
certificates
borrower
not
--
adviser.9
vested
in
lender as
to
each
In
the
recommend
to
were pledged
of the
right to possession
not
agreed
investment
all
is
but merely
with the staffs prior
generally
has
staff
an
with
Commission
consistent
the
acquisition
securities
except
share
by the
default
Bank
the
our case
the
receiver
Manager
of an investment
of
situation
event
of
Bank
the
not provide
In
Here
2a-6
of the Investment
by the
would be
relief
of stock
with
the
noted
limit
does
company
or business
of Rule
scope
an insolvency
in
of
in
the
loan
receiver
inierests
outer
the
instances the party pledging
as the
collateralize
of
assets
Banks
the
is
positions
to
those
to
over the
control
ready to protect
situation
Bank
the
to
limit
over the assets and business
control
to exercise
stands
to
equivalent
an outer
define
these
securities
pledged
certificates
of
representing the
lenders
to perfect
the
equivalent
of being
security
stock
the
8...continued
commissioner
rehabilitation
receivership
Mutual
Benefit
The
rehabilitation
possession
and
control
of
causes
securities
other
or
Fund
and
pub
al
to
bank
and
business
all
of the
in
Mutual
exclusive
contracts
assets
of deposit
of any
real or personal
property
all
1991
immediate
certificates
accounts
placed
Aug 23
avail
commissioner
the
the
title
records
funds
functional
et
order granted
of and
books
action
the
order
Benefit
funds
nature of Mutual
Benefit
pub avail Aug 12 1976 Wall
Funds
Inc
Sep
1974
In
each
of
investment
of the
these
advisory
on
of the
was
of Rule
adoption
Rule
change
should
be
about
the
it
of
is
of actual
control
that
that
the
these
that
under
connection
be
pledge
letters
the pledge
the
itself
were
in
avail
new
of
approval
with
disclosed
agreements and
advisory
Further
acquisition
the
proxy
was not treated
only
the
issued
falls within
acquisition
prior
the
as
to
the
provisions
Pledge Agreement would result in
and management and would result in an assignment
It
foreclosure
contrast
pledge
clear
2a-6 and here we believe
In
noted
would
treated
so
shareholder
that
to termination
rise
advisers
that
in
the
Corp pub
Management
would be sought
However
vote
stated
parties
and
adviser
this
an event giving
the
agreements
investment
statements
of that
letters
Street
the
time
of
the
the
approval
of the
Investment
and
Pledge Agreement
Management
Agreement for the Masters Series negotiations with the bank were well underway
and the sole shareholder of the Series the Investment Manager was fully informed
terms of the
at
Credit
Agreement
the
Jack
Murphy Esq
May 20
1996
Page8
In addition the requested
The
statutory
As David
contracts.11
advisory
Study described
the
discuss
situation
where
other peoples
However
assign
is
someone
else
management
advisory
not
result
since
of the
the
Investment
opinion
Cong
which
that
says
someone
to
the
the
hand
management
continue
will
turn
implies
over
is
selling ones
transferable
as
not
in
any transfer
Investment
of other
asset
sale for these
not result
of the
pledge
management
the
else.2
contract
other
of
home
to go
they have
the
pledge should
the
Further
of the
253 statement
of
all
peoples
Manager
money
to be solely responsible
to
for the
David
person
15
1940
the
General
passage
Counsel
of the
1940
Schenker Chief Counsel
clear
trafficking
in
investment
advisory
adviser
from
every
is
investment
provide
for
its
Company Act Rel
transferring
advisory
automatic
No 354 1942
Congressional
contracts
his
by the
contract
and
fiduciary
of the stockholders
effectuated
assignment
Commission
the
Act
manifests
That intention
must
of
15
over the management
15a that
Section
Investment
Comm on Banking and
Senate
of Section
investment
by turning
different
by
history
an
prevent
March
Subcomm
after the
to prevent
obligations
in
Trust
have
manager
and that you cannot
on the
Manager
3d Sess
shortly
legislative
intention
to
Investment
you
the
is
job he ought
contracts
an advisory
treating
over
was echoed
rendered
to
15a
Study
theme
The
he
not defined the term generally
3580 before
Trust
That
is
securities
Investment
on
76th
Currency
the
10-year
money
Here
obligation
with
course of business
turning
Commissions
the
This provision
relationships
in
Section
underlying
Funds
Hearings
12
else
generally
ordinary
policy
point
cannot be assigned
of voting
pledge
the
in
investment
will
and
this
through
is
the term trafficking
since
securities
it
to
fiduciary
other peoples
of
for gain
office
at
they take these
personal that
to sale
purposes
of the
he
someone
to
the
15a4
assumes
If
of that
management
Although
subject
money
contract
fiduciary
person
with
counsel
15a4
instead
right to
the
Schenker
of Section
purpose
me
Let
consistent
is
15a were designed to inhibit trafficking in investment
Sections
in
provisions
relief
money
requirement
made
termination
after
upon
in
an
Jack
Murphy Esq
May 20
1996
Page9
The
type
or some or
adviser
closed-end
funds
of
all
assumed
Manager
to which
of transaction
the
in
its
Section
1b6
intended
Section
15a4 to protect
companies
is
of
into the
Investment
not
is
this
Moreover
Elite Series
which
and
of
and
addressed by treating
adviser
or
exercise
the
by
We believe therefore
that
securities
the
entry
be deemed
assignment
affiliates
disclosure
connection
in
with
respect
Section
15a
rights
under
with
in
the
that
such
also
would
convening
of an investment
would
the
as
securities
not involve
assignments
prohibiting
about
15a would be more
to such
pledge arrangement
It
with
pledgee on the securities
by
the
If
Agreements
time
at
Series
year
last
Management
The purposes of Section
proposed
Congress was concerned
the
proxy statement
in
its
shareholders
of voting
the
and
Manager
foreclosure
that
disclosure
Management
Masters
of the
within
Investment
necessary for prospectus
proxies
pledgee
prohibited
triggers
of the
detailed
Fund
upon
soliciting
directly
abuses
including
Investment
the
their shares
purchased
Investment
the
expenses
shareholder meeting
of the
funds
otherwise considered
additional
event that
Funds
and shareholders of each
an assignment
be burdened with
arrangements
information is not
the
Congress
investmnt
We note that the
holders
Manager
Funds approved
Closed-End
new
Investment
of the
one year ago
deemed
is
shareholders would
impose
As set
Management Agreements and requires Fund
would serve no useful purpose
Shareholders
of
agreements
the
relatively
Pledge Agreement
credit
that
the
Investment
the
new
of
funds
are
Funds
or management
funds and Closed-End
the pledge
that
Agreements approximately
funds
type
control
and
funds
of transaction
of their security
consent
the
the
is
when
against
Elite Series
terminates
shareholder approval
the
Act
this
Investment
the
of transaction
type
requiring
that
an assignment
which
Elite Series
of the
of an
acquisition
Management Agreements was approved
by shareholders of those Funds
on April
1995 Pilgrim Americas pledge of the Investment
Manager
held
meeting
securities
of the
management
1940
the
without
transferred
transfer
at
of
the
is
to
pursuant
to each
manager
directed
America Group of Funds the Closed-End
Pilgrim
in
forth
is
transaction
the
assets
role as investment
its
15a4
Section
any
of investment
contracts
advisory
The Request
Staff
The
or
202a1-1
particular
Novel
And
Potentially
To Warrant
Beneficial
Response
has
that as
interpretive
requests
under
the
transaction.3
Nikko
Sufficiently
stated
staff
no-action
Is
Investment
The
International
staff
Capital
matter of policy
regarding
the
Advisers Act
of
promulgated
this
Management
it
will
no longer respond
of
application
Rule
2a-6
corollary
to Rule
no-response
policy
because
Company pub
avail
June
1940
the
to
routine
and
Rule
2a-6
to
it
did
1987
not
Jack
Murphy Esq
May 20
1996
Page
10
want
to be in
internal
management
in
actual
or
control
the
staff
in
the
or
verify
This however
the
Investment
advice
as to the
to
or
change
of
that
is
Commission and
addition the
the
control
inquiry
to
necessary
investigation
information regarding
does
not turn on the application
issue that
that
issue lends
this
come
general
important
Further
18f-39 and the
in
light
within
these
policy
of the
Commissions
fund
industry
large
block
of an investment
if
Nikko
the
staff
the
respecting
of multiple
to the
staff
recent
class pricing
corporate
International
though
provide
under
the
staff
specific
interpretive
general
applicability
Rule
adoption
of Rules
structures
it
in
Farrell Inc
the
pub
pub avail
18 1985
and Heine
Capital
Management
useful
of all or
of
financing
pub avail
Jan
avail
pledge
with the
Company
Jan 21 1986
Securities
6c-1O and
connection
Investment
2a-6.18
would be extremely
as to whether
Templeton
Benzak Salomon
March
corollary
issue presented
Capital
avail
no-action
of
Management
Counsel
Ltd pub
1987
the
whether
to
of course
detailed
the
securities
voting
as
of
We believe
determination
issued
advisers
in
the
that even
inquiries
will
202a1-1J.7
issues
proliferation
to
response
of
applicability
to resolution
202a1-1
Rule
Commission stated
Rule the
that
well
itself
in adopting
in
opinion
any
express
would
here goes
factual
is
factual
Advisers Act to Rule 2a-6 the
not
will
transaction
In
make
to
position
we note that
In that regard
context
ordinarily
transactions
letter
no-action
in
discrete
is
Thus we believe
of facts
letter
of
not
th requisite
evaluate
Determining
these
in
in
change
whether
transactions
reorganization
set
are
understandably
ascertain
has occurred
context
of
guess the significance
reorganizations.4
corporate
management
to address
difficult
of having to second
position
June
1986
Spears
Scudder Stevens
Clark
Corporation
22
pub avail Feb 25
1985
15
16
18
Nikko
Jnternational
Advisers Act Rel
Investment
Advisers Act
Rel
No 1034 Sep
We note that the staff has issued several
non-response
Investment
24
1995
implement
obtain
proposing Rule
202a1-1
no-action
letters
in this
Dean
area since
it
adopted
Co
Discover
Witter
1993
Company Act Rel Nos
Collectively
multiple
individual
1987
June
avail
1986
Mutual Benefit
policy
pub avail Feb
19
No 1013 Feb 20 1986
Investment
its
Company pub
these
class
exemptive
20915
Rules
pricing
relief
Rule 18f-3
permit
systems
and 20916
open-end
without
the
Rule 6c-10
investment
need
for
each
Feb
companies
to
company
to
Jack
Murphy Esq
May 20
1996
11
Page
distribution
multiple
class
Sections
15a4
the
obvious
that
these
arrangements
innovations
structure
been
used
two
securities
in
also would
positions
financing
costly
has issued
the
favorable
Finally
in
staff
advisers
Although
an investment
of
pledge
the
amount
would
arrangements
for financing
the
no-action
favorable
connection
with
of multiple
to
could
response
sale of
this
of mutual
mutual
request
shares
of
addressing
it
is
not
distribution
class
the
for
way
simpler and
pave
and provide
funds
fund
letters
an acquisition
apply to the financing
sale of shares
for purposes
an assignment
to
have
that
than arrangements
less
to date
Conclusion
We believe
is
consistent
policy
that
that
non-fact
novel
sufficiently
consideration
by the
15a
if
Pilgrim
under
Manager
Credit
Karen
staffs prior no-action
15a
and
intensive
seek
not
the
Further
beneficial
of the
all
circumstances
the
enforcement
of
staff
action
the
of Rule 2a-6
to
of the
raise any
we believe
warrant
this
issue
review
outstanding voting
described
above
in
Division
of
is
and
Investment
Commission under
to the
securities
connection
accordance
copies
with Securities
of this no-action
Anderberg
at
No 6269 Dec
Please contact
request
202
Rel
Act
626-3384
if
you have
the
with
any
James
Pilgrim
Thomas
Dorsey
Hennessy Esq
America Investments
Kelly
III
Whitney
Esq
Inc
1980
undersigned
questions
matter
cc
language
and does not
positions
to address
potentially
that
assurance
recommend
America pledges
the
designed
is
within
squarely
of
the
Section
Investment
entering
into
the
we have
enclosed
Agreement
In
seven
would
falls
staff
we
Therefore
Management
Section
relief
requested
with the
generally
concerns
the
Sincerely
yours
Jeffrey
Puretz
at
or
202 626-3358
comments
on
or
this
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.