Rescission of ClimateRelated Disclosure
Agency decision
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
FACT SHEET
Rescission of ClimateRelated Disclosure
Rules
On May 29, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed the rescission of
amendments to its rules under the Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange Act of 1934
that require registrants to provide certain climate-related information in their registration
statements and annual reports.
Background
The Commission approved the amendments to its rules by a 3-2 vote on March 6, 2024. The
rule amendments mandate highly specific and granular disclosure about climate-related
matters such as greenhouse gas emissions, management of climate-related risks, and the
financial statement effects of severe weather events. These climate disclosure rules apply
to virtually all public companies.
•
Within 60 days of the Commission’s adoption of the rule amendments, various parties
petitioned for judicial review in multiple federal courts of appeals. On March 21, 2024,
these petitions were consolidated for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth
Circuit.
•
On April 4, 2024, the Commission entered a stay of the climate disclosure rules pending
completion of judicial review of the consolidated Eighth Circuit petitions.
•
On March 27, 2025, the Commission voted to end its defense of the climate disclosure
rules.
•
On September 12, 2025, the Eighth Circuit issued an order holding the consolidated
petitions for review in abeyance until such time as the Commission reconsiders the
climate disclosure rules by notice-and-comment rulemaking or renews its defense of
them.
Highlights of the Proposing Release
The Commission has proposed to rescind the climate disclosure rules in their entirety
because they were a dramatic overreach of the Commission’s statutory authority and,
independently, unsound as a matter of policy.
More specifically, the proposing release discusses the scope of the Commission’s
disclosure authority and explains the Commission’s views that the climate disclosure rules
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FACT SHEET | Rescission of Climate-Related Disclosure Rules
should be rescinded because they exceed the statutory limits on the Commission’s
disclosure authority.
The proposing release also explains the Commission’s views that even if the Commission
had authority to adopt the climate disclosure rules, several independent policy reasons
support their rescission:
•
They are unnecessary and inconsistent with a registrant-specific, materiality-based
approach to disclosure.
•
They stray well beyond the policy concerns of the federal securities laws.
•
They impose substantial costs that are not justified by the informational benefits they
may provide to some investors.
•
They are at odds with the Commission’s policy objectives of facilitating capital formation
and promoting public company status.
What’s Next
The public comment period will remain open until 60 days after publication of the proposing
release in the Federal Register.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Page 2 of 2
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.