~~c\.",...;i~:m.i;¡\..~...
Agency decision
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
~~c\.",...;i~:m.i;¡\..~...
r~~a:.~r¡.~ ..~~ ;ß....l~'
.~
MAY 2 9 1997 ~.
~ ~ .- .~. .'. .' ./
REPONSE OF TI OFFCE OF CH COUNSEL
DIVSION OF INTM MAAGEM
. ~ -1" :.... "-.--"
..,,_.~~:..Wf":,.,;~~
Our Ref. No. 97-243-CC
Lap Technologies, Inc.
File No. 132-3
By letter dated May 6, 1997, you reuest assurace tht the st would not
remmend that the Commssion tae enforcment action if cert inormation concerng
pnvate investment companes is poste on a web site adstere by Lap Technologies,
Inc. ("Lap"), under the cirumstaces desnbe below. Speifcay, you reuest assurace
that the postig of inormation on the web' site wil not (i) involve any form of genera
solicitation or genera advertsing on behal of a parcipatig fund with the meag of rule
S02(c) of Regulation D under the Secunties Act of 1933
section 3
("Securities Act"), (ü) constitute a
of securities by a parcipatig fund with the meag of setion 3(c)(1) or
public offerig
(c)
(7) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 ("Investment Company Act"), or
(il) cause any investment adviser to a parcipatig fund to be deemed to be holding itself out
generay to the public as an investment adviser with the meag of section 203(b)(3) of
the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 ("Advisers Act").
. Facts
Lap is engaged in the business of data prossing, softar development and the
cretion and maitenance of web sites. Lap proposes to establish and adminster a web site
that wil conta inormation concerng funds excluded from regulation as investment
companes pursuant to section 3(c)(1) or section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act and
privately offered pursuant tü Regulation D under the Secuntie& Act ("pnvate funds"). 1/
You represent that neither Lap nor any of 'its. afiltes wil operate or provide investment
advisory services to any of the pnvate funds listed on the site. 2l The investment advisers
1/ Section 3(c)(1) excets from the derintion of investment company any issuer
(i) whose outstadig securities (other than short-term paper) ar beneficiay owned
by not more than 100 persons, and (ü) that is nót makg and does not presently
propose to make a public offerig of its secunties. Section 3(c)(7) excets from the
derintion of investment company any issuer, the outstadig seunties of which ar
owned exclusively by persons who, at the tie of acquisition of such seunties, ar
"qualed purchasers" (as dermed in setion 2(a)(Sl) of the Act), and which is not
makg and does not at that tie propose to make a public offerig of such seunties.
2l You also reresent that Lap is not a broker-deaer or afilte with a broker-deaer,
no employee of Lap is a registere rerentative of a broker-deaer, and Lap; .its
afilates and their employees wil not in connection with the web site be involved in
effectig trsactions in secunties or assistig parcipants by negotitig trsactions
in secunties. You ar not sekig assurace as to whether Lap is reuir to be
registere as an investment adviser or broker-deaer in relation to the site. Beuse
Lap's activities could rase issues concerng broker-deaer registrtion, the Division
of Market Regulation has asked us to inorm you that the reresentations made in
(contiued. . .)
of the pnvate funds listed on the web site may be regitere under the Advisers Act or they
may be exempt from registrtion pursuat to setion 203(b)(3) of the Advisrs Act. J/
You antiCipate that managers of the pnvat funds wil post both desnptive inormation (for
the funds on the web
exaple, offerig memorada) and performance inormation relatig to
site. You state that the web site is designed to stre and ecnomi the trsmission of
pnvate fund inormation among a selec grup of indust professionas tht in many cases
aldy may have accs to such inormation.
In order to obta accss to the pnvate fund inormation avaible on the web site, a
potential subscnber wil be reuir to (i) complete a questionn designed to alow Lap
to form a resonable basis for determing that the subscriber is an "accreted investor"
withi the meag of Securities Act Regulation D who has at least a $2. mion investment
portolio, and (ü) pay a subscnption fee of approxiately $500 per month. You reresent
that Lap wil not be an agent of any subscnber to the web site. Subscribers who have pre
qualed as accreted investors and who have paid the subscnption fee wil reive a
password permttg them accss to the pnvate fund inormation posted on the web site. M
You also reresent tht Lap wil reuir subscnbers to agr not to invest in any posted
fund (other than funds in which the subscnber or its afiltes aldy invests, ha aldy
ben solicited for or is aldy actively considerig an investment in) for 30 days following
the subscnber's qualcation. You maita
that this waitig period, togeter with the
subscnption fee and the fact that most pnvate funds ar only avaible to tae subscnptions
on a quarerly or anual basis, ensure that subscribers do not join to invest in any paricular
fund and that the qualcation by Lap of the subscnber, therefore, is not deemed a
solicitation for any paricular fund.
2/(...contiued).
~
Venture Listig Services, Inc. (pub. avai. June 15, 1994) app to be relevant to the
propose activities.
J/ Section 203(b)(3), in relevant par, provides an exemption from registrtion for any
investment adviser who durig the preg 12 months had fewer th 15 clients,
and who neither holds hiself out generay to the public as an investment adviser nor
acts as an investment adviser to any registere investment company.
~I . You rerent that pnvate funds poste on the web site and their mangers wil not be
given automatic accss to the site by vire of being included in the database, but wil
be reuir to follow the normal subscnption proure and pay the subscnption fee.
Morever, subscnbers must agr not to.deliver pnvate fund inormation posted on
the web site to anyone other than the subscriber's authonz personnel and its
professional advisers. .
-2
Analysis
The Commission ha indicated tht the placement of pnvate offenng materi on a
web site, without suffcient proure to lit accs to accrete investors, would be
inconsistent with the prohibition agaist genera solicitation or adverting in role 502( c) of
Regulation D. s.1 In a no-action letr to IPet (pub. avai. July 26, 1996), however, the
sta of the Division of Corpration Fince state tht the postg of a notice of a private
offenng on a web site would not be deemed a n genera solicitation n or n genera advertsing"
withi the meag of Regulation D when pre-quacation and password-proieon
proures designed to -liit accss to the web site were in place. §/
You maita that the postig of pnvate fund inormation on the web site and the
accessing of such inormation by pre-qualed subscnbers on a password-protecte basis
by any parcipatig fund
would not constitute "genera solicitation" or "genera advertsing"
withi the meag of Regulation D. You furter maita tht the postig of pnvate fund
related inormation on the web site, subject to the sae proures, would not constitute a
public offerig of seunties of any parcipatig fund for purpses of setion 3(c)(1) or
section 3
(c)
(7) of the Investment Company Act. You note tht, as a genera mattr, if an
is public for purpses of the Secunties Act, it also would be public for purPses of
section 3(c)(1) and, presumably, section 3(c)(7). 11
offer'
In addition, you assert that an investment adviser exempt from registrtion under
section 203(b)(3) of the Advisers Act should not, by vire of postig p'nvate fund
inormation on the web site subject to the proures descnbe above, be deemed to be
5.1 See Use of Electrnic Med for Delivery Purpses, Securities Act Relea No. 7233
(Oct. 6, 1995). The Commsion ha reueste~mment wheter the genera
solicitation prohibitioqs should be relaed for cert Regulation D offenngs or saes
to quaed purchars: See Secunties Act Concets and Their Efec on Caita
Formation, Securities Act Release.No. 7314 (July 31, 1996) at text accmpanying
note 66. .
§/ You note that, to ensure tht the quacation of a: subscriber would not bè demed a
solicitation for a parcula offerig, the IPet letr reuir tht subscrirs not be
permtt to parcipate in an offerig tht was post on the web site prior to the
investor's quacation. You maita tht th proure is not practca in the ca
of pnvate fund offenngs, which ar made on a semi-cntiuous bais (quarly or
anuay). You therefore prose the 30-dy waitig period deribe abve to
ensure tht subscribers do not join to invest in any parcula private fund.
ir See, e.g., Gerad Riti (pub. avai. June 7, 1983).
-3
"holdig itslf out generay to the public as an investment advir. n fi.l You mata tht
the web site inormation wil not be "publicly avaible, n beuse accs to such iiormation
wil be lited to a select grup of accrete invesrs thugh the pre-quacation
proures and password-protetion system. You rerent th Lap wil reuir private
fund managers to agr to post only pnvat fund rela inormaton on the web site and to
not offer other service (such as advisry service) or prouct on the site. 2.1 You al
maita tht the use of the site by unrgire invesent advirs is consisnt with the
sae har creted by rule 203(b)(3)-1 under the Advisrs Act, beuse the inormation
listed on the site wil exclusively concern funds strcture as lite paerships tht ~
pnvately offere in complice with Regulation D. 10/ .
Based on the use of proures designed to lit accs to the web site inormation to
a select grup of accrete investors, we do not believe tht the propose postig of pnvate
fund inormation on the web site would constitute a public offerig of seurities by a
(7) of the Investment
parcipatig fund with the meag of seon 3(c)(I) or setion 3
(c)
Company Act. 11/ In addition, bas on the use of proure designed to lit accss
to the web site inormation to a select grup of accrete investors and your rerentation
that Lap wil reuir pnvate fund mangers to agr to post only pnvate fund related
inormation on the web site and to not offer other service or proucts on the site, we do not
believe that an investment adviser who posts only pnvate fund inormation on the web site
would be "holding itself out generay to the public" as an investment adviser with the
meag of section 203(b)(3) of the Advisers Act.
~I The Commission has stated tht an adviser who uses a publicly avaible ~lectrnic
medum such as a web site to provide inormation about its service would not quay
for the exemption from registrtion provided by section 203(b)(3) of the Advisers
Act. See Use of Electronic Med by Broker-Deers, Trasfer Agents, and
Investment Advisers for Delivery of Inormation, Securities Act Release No. 7288
(May 9, 1996), at text following note 32 (an investment adviser that advertses using
electronic media wil be deemed - to have offere .its service to the public).
9./ Cf. Munder Capita Mangement (pub. avai. May 17, 1996) (mutual fund related
documents avaible on a web site ar not advertments for the adviser's advisory
services unless they ar "designed to maita exig clients or solicit new clients
for the adviser"). .'.
10/ Rule 203(b)(3)-I(c) provides tht an investment advisr relying on the role sha not
be deemed to be holdig itslf out generay to the public, as an investment advisr,
with the meag of seon 203(b)(3), solely beuse it pacipates in a non-public
offerig of liite parership interests under the Secunties Act.
111 We note.
tht, whie accss to the web site would be liited to accreited investors,
section 3(c)(7) funds would be reuir to liit saes of seunties to "qualed .
purchasers," as dermed in section 2(a)(51) of the Act.
- 4
I
¡
!
We therefore would not remmend tht the Commsion tae enforcment action if
Lap posts inormation concerng pnvate funds ona web site tht is pasword-proteted
and accssible only to subscnbers who ar pre-detrmed by Lap to be accrete
investors. 121
The Division of Corpration Fince ha as us to inorm you tht the quacation
of accreted investors in the maner descnbe and the postig of a notice concerng a
pnvate fund on a web site tht is password-prote and accsible only to subscribers who
ar pre-determined by Lap to be accrete invesrs would not involve a n genera
solicitation" or "genera advertsing" withi the meag of role 502(c) of Secunties Act
Regulation D. In rechig this conclusion, the Division note tht (i) both the invitation to
complete the questionnai used to determine whether an investor is accreted and the
questionnai itself wil be generic in nature and wil not reference any spifc funds posted
or to be posted on the password-protected web site; (ü) the password-protete web site wil
ha made the detrmtion tht the
be avaible to a parcula investor only afer Lap
parcula potenti investor is accreted; and (il) a potenti investor may purcha
securities only afer the waitig period descnbe in your letr. In th regar, the"-Division
taes no position as to whether the inormation obtaed by Lap is suffcient to form a
resonable basis for believing an investor. to be accreted.
These positions ar based on the facts and cirumstaces set fort in your letter. Any
~~s~.
diferent facts or circumstaces may,require a diferent conclusion. 131
Speia Counsel
~
12/ We note tht there may be other, equay effective, proure desigqed to rect
accss to web site inormation that would not cause a private fund to be unale to rely
(c)
(7) of the Investment Company Act or a pnvate fund
manager to be unable to rely on section 203(b )(3) of the Advisers Act.
on section 3(c)(1) or setion 3
13/ We tae ths opprtnity to express our view that we also would not object if similar
screnig proures were use by the publisher of a pnvate fund ditory
) distributed in paper, rather than electronic, format.
-5
~
PULIO l
9EenON
1933 Act - Rule 502(c)
1940 ICA - Section 3(c)(I)
1940 ICA - Section 3(c)(7)
1940 IAA - Section 203(b)(3)
AVATT.A'RTr.TY .J .. ;iQ-Q1
SIDLEY & AUSTIN
A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESIONAL CORPORATIONS
ONE FIRST NATio.NAL PLAZA
CHICAGO., ILLINo.iS 60603
Lo.S ANGELES
LONDo.N
TELEPHo.NE 312: 853-7000
NEW YORK
WASHINGTo.N, D.C.
TELEX 25-4364
SINGAPo.RE
FACSIMILE 312: 853-7036
TOKYO
FOUNDED 1866
WRITER'S DIRECT NUMBER
(312) 853-2140
May
6, 1997
John O'Hanlon, Esq.
Assistant Chief Counsel
Offce of the General Couns~l
Division of Investment Management
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Martin Dunn, Esq.
Chief Counsel
Division of Corporation Finance
Securities and Exchange Commssion
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549
~
Re: Lamp Technologies, Inc.
No-Action Request
Gentlemen:
On behalf of this firm's client, Lamp Technològies, Inc. ("Lamp"), we are writing
Division of Corporation Finance
to request that the Division of Investment Management and the'
co.nfirm to us that they will not recommend that the Securities and Exchange Commssion (the
"SEC") take any enforcement action against Lamp or any participating hedge fund manager or
investment adviser if certain information co.ncerning hedge funds is posted on a World Wide Web
site administered by Lamp, which site wil be password-protected and accessible only to
SIDLEY & AUSTIN
CHICAGO
John O'Hanlon, Esq.
Martin Dunn, Esq.
May 6, 1997
Page 2
subscribers who have been pre-qualified by Lamp as accredited investors as defined in SEC Rule
501(a) and qualified eligible participants as defined in Commodity Futures Trading Commission
("CFTC") Rule 4.7. We seek assurance that the proposed activity will not (a) involve
any form of
general solicitation or general advertising on behalf of any hedge fund within the meaning of Rule
502( c) under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act"), (b) constitute a public offering of
securities by any hedge fund within the meaning of
Section 3(c)(I) or Section 3(c)(7) of
the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "Company Act"), or (c) cause any investment adviser to a
participating hedge fund to be deemed to be holding itself out generally to the public within the
meaning of
Section 203(b)(3) of
the Investment Advisers Act of1940 (the "Advisers Act"),
Facts
Lamp is engaged in the businesses of data processing, software development and
the creation and maintenance of web sites. i Lamp proposes to establish and administer a home
page and other linked pages (collectively, the "Site") on the World Wide Web which will contain
regularly updated information concerning hedge funds. Neither Lamp nor any of its affliates will
operate or provide investment advisory services to any ofth~ hedge funds listed on the Site.
Further, Lamp will not be an agent of any posted hedge fund.or hedge fund manager, nor will
Lamp be àn agent of any subscriber to the Site: . Lamp anticipates that the Site wil be of value .
primarily to investment and financial professionals, such as fund-of-funds managers (including an'
affliate of
Lamp), hedge fund managers, broker-dealers, large family.
investment offces, fund
administrators and accounting firms. These investment and financial professionals currently
expend significant resources compiling and maintaining hedge fund information internally and the
Site is primarily intended to give such professionals an outside alternative that wil improve the
quality and timeliness of
hedge fund information in a cosb.effective manner. At the same time,
because of the centralizing function of the Site, the managers of the posted hedge funds will be
spared the ineffciency of
transmitting the same information to all such professionals individually.
The hedge funds listed on the Site will be exempt from registration as investment
the Company Act and will be
privately offered pursuant to SEC Regulation D under the' Securities Act. The participating hedge
funds wil include funds closed to new capital and funds currently accepting new capitaL. The
investment
advisers of the listed hedge funds may be either registered as investment advisers
companies pursuant to Section 3(c)(I) or Section 3(c)(7) of
i Lamp currently is not registered with the SEC or CFTC in any capacity. Lamp is not a brokerdealer or affliated with a broker-dealer, no Lamp employee is a registered representative of a
broker-dealer, and Lamp, its affliates and their employees wil not in connection with the Site be
involved in effecting transactions in securities or. assisting participants by negotiating transactions
in securities. We are not seeking assurance
from the SEe as to whether Lamp needs to be
registered as an investment adviser or broker-dealer .in relation to the Site.
SIDLEY & AUSTIN
CHICAGO
John O'Hanlon, Esq.
Martin Dunn, Esq.
May 6, 1997
Page 3
the Advisers
under the Advisers Act or exempt from registration pursuant to Section 203(b)(3) of
Act. Each hedge fund (or its manager or adviser) will pay Lamp a nominal fee to administer the
Site, primarily for the convenience of providing a central clearing point for information which the
hedge fund managers would otherwise send individually
to numerous entities, The fee paid by a
hedge fund wil be unrelated to whether a fund is open or closed to new investment or to the
performance of or sales of interests by a fund. Each hedge fund manager wil have exclusive
control over the content of information regarding its hedge fund downloaded to the Site, although
hedge fund managers may delegate the mechanical data entry function to Lamp or another service
provider. Lamp anticipates that hedge fund managers wil post both descriptive information
(possibly including the fund's offering memorandum) and performance-related information. Lamp
will require participating hedge fund managers to agree to post only hedge fund related
information on the Site and not to offer other services or products on the Site. The Site is not
generally intended as a mechanism for distributing required documents (e'.g., Form ADV Part II)
and notices under the Advisers Act, but each hedge fund manager wil undertake to make any
- deliveries of such required documents in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-7289, dated May
9, 1996. The Site wil also have an interactive capability designed to allow subscribers to conduct
searches of
the hedge fund data using user-selected criteria (e.g., all equity managers with over
$100 millon under management and a five-year record). To facilitate user searches, Lamp wil
organize the posted data in logical form and will perform certain mathematical functions, such as
computing return and volatility statistics, for all hedge funds.
Because the hedge fund managers themselves will be responsible for all posted
information concerning the hedge funds, a legend substantially as follows wil also be prominently
displayed:
~
THE INORMTION INCLUDED IN TilS REPOSITORY is THE RESPONSffILITY OF
THE RESPECTIVE HEDGE FUN MAAGERS. LAM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. HAS
NOT TAKN AN STEPS TO VERIY THE ADEQUACY, ACCURCY OR
INORMTION. NEITHER LAM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
ITS AFFILIATES NOR THEIR RESPECTIVE OFFICERS, DIRCTORS, AGENTS AN
COMPLETENESS OF AN
EMPLOYEES MAS AN WARY, EXPRESS OR IMLIED, OF AN KI
WHATSOEVER, AN NONE OF THESE PARTIES SHAL BE LIABLE FOR.AN
LOSSES, DAMGES, COSTS OR EXPENSES, OF EVERY KI AN DESCRITION,
RELATING TO THE ADEQUAC.Y, ACCURCY OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY
INORMATION ON THIS REPOSITORY OR THE USE OF INORMATION ON TilS
REPOSITORY.
The entities Lamp intends to solicit to become subscribers to the Site primarily
constitute a select group of financially sophisticated investment and financial professionals which
may already monitor and gather information from a wide range of
hedge
funds. Each subscriber
SIDLEY & AUSTIN
CHICAGO
John O'Hanlon, Esq.
Martin Dunn, Esq.
May 6, i 997
Page 4
will be pre-qualified by Lamp as an "accredited investor" under SEC Rule 501(a) and a "qualified
eligible participant" ("QEP") under CFTC Rule 4.7 (essentially an accredited investor which has at
least a $2 millon investment portfolio). In order to be pre-qualified, a potential subscriber must
complete a questionnaire designed to enable Lamp to form a reasonable basis for believing that .
such potential subscriber is both an accredited
investor and a QEP. The questionnaire wil be
generic in nature (i.e., it wil not reference any of
the particular hedge funds included on the Site).
Afer review of the questionnaire by Lamp, an eligible entity will receive the opportunity to
become a subscriber to the Site ata substantial fee (currently anticipated at approximately $500
per month). Each subscriber wil receive a password permitting such subscriber continuous
access to the hedge fund information contained on the Site. Access to the non-generic
information posted on the Site, including the names of
the posted hedge funds and their advisers,
wil be restricted to such subscribers.2 Each subscriber will agree not to deliver hedge fund
information posted on the Site to anyone other than the subscriber's authorized personnel and its
professional advisers.
Legal Analysis
Rule 502(c) under the Securities Act
We believe that the posting of hedge fund information on the Site and the
accessing of such information by qualified subscribers on a password-protected basis wil not'.
constitute "any form of general solicitation or general advertising" by any participating hedge fund
under SEC Rule 502(c). This conclusion follows from the primary purpose of
the Site (i.e.,
effcient information transmission rather than marketing), the pre-qualification of all subscribers
and the limited number and type of subscribers (i.e., thos. market professionals wiling to pay the
substantial fee).
In reaching this conclusion, we have also relied upon the IPONET no-action letter
(pub. avaiL. July 26, i 996) ("IPONET"), in which the Division of Corporation Finance expressed
its opinion that the operation ofa World Wide Web site which posted private offerings for a fee
. would not be deemed a general solicitation or general advertising. The Site, as proposed by
Lamp, wil operate in a manner similar to the site proposed
in IPONET, as investors will be prequalified prior to gaining access to a password-protected page on which information conceming
privately-offered hedge funds wil be posted. In the present instance, as in IPONET, (i) both the
invitation to complete the pre-qualifying questionnaire and the questionnaire itself wil be generic
in nature and wil not reference any specific funds posted or to be posted, (ii) the password
2 Posted hedge funds and their managers wil not be given access to the Site by virtue of such
posting, Instead, they must follow the normal subscription procedure and pay the subscription
fee.
SIDLEY & AUSTIN
CHICAGO
John O'HanIon, Esq.
Martin Dunn, Esq.
May 6, 1997
Page 5
protected pages containing non-generic information will be available to a prospective subscriber
be a..
waiting period prior to the time that a new subscriber may purchase securities of a posted hedge
fund, On the last point, IPONET investors Vlere only granted access to. transactions posted after
the investor's qualification. That procedure is' not practical here given the open-ended (i.e.,
continuous quarterly or annual sales) nature of many hedge funds, so instead Lamp will require
subscribers to agree not to invest in any posted hedge fund (othèr than funds the subscriber or its
affliates already invests in, has already been solicited for or is already actively considering an
investment in) for thirty days after the subscriber's qualification. This waiting period (together
with the substantial fee and the fact that most hedge funds are only available to take subscriptions
on a quarterly or annual basis) should be suffcient to insure that subscribers do not join to invest
only after Lamp has determined that the prospective investor is qualified and (iii) there will"
in any particular hedge fund (and thus that the qualification by Lamp of such subscriber is not
deemed a solicitation for any particular hedge fund).
Section 3(c)(1) and Section 3(c)(7) of
the Company Act
We further believe that the posting of certain hedge funci information on the Site,
as described above, will not constitute a public offering for any participating hedge fund for
purposes of
Section 3(c)(I) or Section 3(c)(7) of
the Company Act. The basis of
this belief
is the
same as that set forth above for Securities Act purposes, and we note that the Division of
Investment Management has generally interpreted the non-public offering requirement of Section
3(c)(I) as consistent with the "private offering" restrictions of
Regulation D (see, e,g., C. Evans
Patterson no-action letter (pub. avaiL. May 8, 1988)).
Section 203(b)(3) of
the Advisers Act ,
Certain of the investment advisers to hedge funds that utilize the Site will be
registered with the SEC under the Advisers Act. However, Lamp would prefer to also allow
participation by unregistered advisers relying ~n the exemption
provided by Section 203(b)(3) of
the Advisers Act. In that regard, we believe that such aì 'adviser should not be deemed to be
"holding itself out generally to the public as an investment adviser" by virtue of posting hedge
fund information on the Site. "
We believe this conclusion follows from the primary purpose of the Site and the
potential subscribers. We understand that an
business cards or telephone
listings. We are also aware that the SEC has recently declared in Release No. 33-7288 that "ifan
adviser uses a publicly available electronic medium such as a World Wide Web site to provide
nature, limited number and pre-qualification of
adviser holds ~iself out to the public through the indiscriminate use of
information about its servces, the adviser would not qualify for the exemption from registration in
section 203(b )(3) of the Advisers Act." The Site information, however, wil not be "publicly
SIDLEY & AUSTIN
CHICAGO
John O'Hanlon, Esq.
Martin Dunn, Esq.
May 6, 1997
Page 6
available." Access to the Site will be strictly limited through a password.;protection system to
financially sophisticated subscribers who have been pre-qualified by Lamp as accredited investors
and QEPs. Lamp anticipates that the subscribers to the Site will be investment and financial
professionals such as fund-of-funds managers, hedge fund managers, broker-dealers, large family
investment offces," fund administrators and accountants which may already have access to most, if
not all, of the hedge funds listed on the Site. The Site is simply designed to streamline and
economize the transmission of information among a select group of industry professionals which
may already have access to such information. Furthermore, the managers/investment advisers of
the hedge funds posted on the Site wil generally manage only one or a few hedge funds and wil
generally not be seeking new investment advisory clients.
'.
We also believe that the use of the Site by an unregistered investment adviser is
within the safe harbor created by SEC Rule 203(b)(3)-I, which provides, in relevant part, that
"any person relying on this rule shall not be deemed to be holding itself out generally to the public
as an investment adviser, within the meaning of section 203(b )(3), solely because it participates in
a non-public offering of limited partnership interests under the Securities Act of 1933." The
information listed an the Site will exclusively concern hedge funds, which ar~ .structured as limited
partnerships or other \:ollective investment vehicles. Each hedge fund manager will be required to
represent to Lamp that the fund will be privately offered in strict compliance with SEC Regulation
D. The subscribers to the Site wil all be'accredited investors eligible to participate in Regulation
D private placements. Finally, as discussed above, the subscriber qualification process and the
password-protection feature will be designed to satisfy Regulation D requirements (as ilustrated
that the unregistered advisers which post hedge fund
information on the Site are covered by Rule 203(b)(3)-I, and thus will not be deemed to be
holding themselves out generally to the public as investmant advisers solely by virtue of such
in IPONET). Consequently, it is our belief
activity.
Conclusion
Because access to the Site will be restricted"to it select group of
subscribers who
have been pre-qualified through the use of a generic questionnaire as accredited investors and
QEPs, we believe that the posting of information concerning hedge funds on the Site will not (a)
involve any form of general solicitation or general advertising within ttie meaning of Rule S02( c)
under the Securities Act, (b) constitute a public offering of securities within the meaning of
Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of
the Company Act, or (c) cause any unregistered investment
adviser to hold itself
out generally to the public within the meaning of
Section 203(b)(3) of
the
Advisers Act. We respectfully request your confirmation that yàu wil not recommend that the
SEe take any enforcement action on the foregoing basis if
the Site is established and operated as
described above.
SIDLEY & AUSTIN
CHICAGO
John O'Hanlon, Esq.
Martin Dunn, Esq.
May 6, 1997
"Page 7
Pursuant to SEe Release No. 33-6269, we herewith enclose seven copies of
this
no-action request.
Please contact the undersigned at (312) 853-2140 with any. comments or questions
you may have.
Sincerely,
1l~fl~
Wiliam D. Kerr
WDK/dc
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Aladin Abughazaleh
Lamp Technologies, Inc.
Mr. Arhur F. Bell, Jr.
Arhur F. Bell, Jr. & Associates
::ODMAIPCDOSICHICAG01374716\1 May 6, 1997 (4:S8pm)
~
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.