S E C U R I T I E S A N D EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Agency decision
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
\
UNITED S T A T E S
S E C U R I T I E S A N D EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
DIVISION OF
TRADING AND MARKETS
March 12,2008
Norman M. Reed
General Counsel
Omgeo LLC
55 Water Street
New York, NY
Re:
No-Action Request of Omgeo LLC
Dear Mr. Reed:
In your letter dated March 11,2008, on behalf of Omgeo LLC ("Omgeo"), you
request assurance that the staff of the Division of Trading and Markets would not
recommend enforcement action under Rule lob-10 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 ("Exchange Act") against Omgeo7s broker-dealer customers (the "Broker-Dealer
Participants) that rely on Omgeo's TradeSuite service ("TradeSuite") to satisfy their
confirmation delivery obligations to their institutional customers that are customers for
purposes of Rule lob- 10 (each, a "Customer"), if the disclosures Omgeo's BrokerDealer Participants customarily provide on the back of paper confirmations are provided
electronically, as discussed in your letter.
Response:
Based on the facts and representations set forth in your letter, the staff of the
Division of Trading and Markets will not recommend enforcement action to the
Commission under Exchange Act Rule lob- 10 against Omgeo's Broker-Dealer
Participants if they rely on TradeSuite to satisfy their confirmation delivery obligations to
Customers under Rule lob-10(a) where the disclosures customarily provided on the back
of paper confirmations are provided electronically, as discussed in your letter. In taking
this position, we note in particular that each electronic trade confirmation, including the
URL linkage, will contain all of the information required by Rule lob-10. We also note
that when a Customer to whom a confirmation must be given or sent is other than a
TradeSuite participant, Broker-Dealer Participants will continue to have a responsibility
to give or send trade confirmations to such Customers, pursuant to Rule lob-10.
This position concerns enforcement action under Rule lob-10 only and is based
solely upon the representations you have made and is limited strictly to the facts and
conditions described in your letter. Any different facts or circumstances, including any
change to the operation of TradeSuite, may require a different response. Finally, we
express no view with respect to other questions the proposed activities of Omgeo may
Noi-man M. Reed
March 12,2008
Page 2 of 2
raise, including the applicability of any other federal or state laws or the applicability of
self-regulatory organization rules conceining customer account coizfinnations.
Sincerely,
Deputy Chief Counsel
0
omgeo
Shaping S T P m
Norman M. Reed
General Counsel
March 11,2008
Omgeo
55 Water Street
22nd Floor
New York, NY 1004 1
Te 21 2.855.3244
Fax 212.855.32l5
-.orngeo.com
Ms. Paula R. Jenson
Deputy Chief Counsel
Division of Trading and Markets
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20549
Re:
Request for Relief Pursuant to Rule 1Ob-10(Q
Dear Ms. Jenson:
Omgeo LLC ("Omgeo") requests assurance that the staff of the Division of Trading and
Markets of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") would not
recommend enforcement action to the Commission under Rule 10b-10(a) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), against Omgeo's broker-dealer
customers (the "Broker-Dealer Participants"), which rely on Omgeo's TradeSuite service
("TradeSuite") to satisfy their confirmation delivery obligations to their institutional
customers that are customers for purposes of Rule 10b-10 (each, a "Customer"), if the
disclosures Omgeo's Broker-Dealer Participants customarily provide on the back of
paper confirmations are provided as discussed below. TradeSuite is the current name of
the ID System that was formerly operated by The Depository Trust Company ("DTC")
and which, pursuant to no-action relief from the staff, has since 1983 provided electronic
confirmations in satisfaction of Rule 10b-10 to the Customers of broker-dealers using that
system.' Omgeo is a Delaware limited liability company that is a joint venture between
The Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation ("DTcc")~ and certain subsidiaries of
The Thomson Corporation ("Thomson"). The Commission approved the joint venture in
2001, at which time DTCC transferred its TradeSuite service to ~ m ~ e o . ~
I
Letter re: The Depositow Trust Comuany (January 3 1, 1983). In 1983, DTC obtained relief to provide
confnnations to clients via (i) hard copy, (ii) microfilm, (iii) Participant Terminal System, (iv) Dial-upTeletype compatible Terminal, (v) Tape-to-Tape transmission, (vi) Facsimile Transmission, and (vii)
Computer Communication Facility. See also letter re: The Deuositorv Trust Company (October 29, 1974).
2
DTCC was created in 1999 as a holding company for DTC and the National Securities Clearing
Corporation, each of which is registered as a clearing agency pursuant to Section 17A of the Exchange Act.
3
Exchange Act Release Nos. 44188 (April 17,2001) and 44891 (April 17,2001). The Commission has
also granted an exemption from registration as a clearing agency to Omgeo Matching Services - US, LLC
(formerly named GJV Matching Services - US, LLC), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Omgeo.
Omgeo provides through Omgeo Matching Services - US, LLC specified services that would require
registration with the Commission as a clearing agency, absent an exemption from such registration, or
designation as a "Qualified Vendor" as defined in New York Stock Exchange Rule 387(a)(5) and NASD
Rule 11860. See also letter re: The Deoositorv Trust Company (April 17, 2001) (stating that the transfer of
A DTCWhomson Financial Company
Ms. Paula R. Jenson
Page 2 of 7
March 11,2008
Omgeo's Request
Omgeo proposes to make available to its Broker-Dealer Participants a new service that
will permit those Broker-Dealer Participants to satisfy the confirmation delivery
requirements of Rule lob-10(a) electronically through an enhancement to TradeSuite and
thereby completely eliminate the need for paper confirmation^.^ As you know, many
broker-dealers continue to send paper confirmations to their institutional customers.
They do this because these broker-dealers have historically placed many of the
disclosures that Rule lob-10 requires, particularly with regard to fixed income
transactions, on the back of paper confirmation^.^ We understand that the costs to the
securities industry of continuing to provide paper confirmations are quite high -according to our estimate, in excess of $273 million annually.' In calculating this
TradeSuite to Omgeo will not affect the Rule lob-10 relief previously granted to DTC with respect to
TradeSuite).
4
Omgeo would like to point out to the staff that TradeSuite currently discloses the key, transaction specific
information that Rule lob-10 requires. TradeSuite currently has dedicated fields disclosing the following
items, where applicable: (1) trade date; (2) identity of the security; (3) price; (4) shares, units or principal
amount; (5) capacity; (6) commission; (7) reported price; (8) debt security subject to redemption prior to
maturity; (9) dollar price (where debt security transaction effected on basis of yield; (10) non-governmental
debt security not rated by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization; (1 1) market maker status;
(12) uon-SIPC membership; and (13) time of transaction. Omgeo will also add to TradeSuite dedicated
fields disclosing the following items by the end of the first quarter of 2009: (1) "mixed capacity," and
"principal, agent and agent for another" will be added to the existing capacity field; (2) third-party
remuneration received; (3) markupimarkdown; (4) current yield; (5) yield to maturity; and (6) yield to call.
Free form text fields are currently available on the TradeSuite confirmations, which broker-dealers may use
to disclose the information to be added by the end of the first quarter of 2009. After the first quarter of
2009, we understand that Broker-Dealer Participants will be required to use the dedicated fields to provide
the Rule lob-10 disclosures stated above where such dedicated fields are available.
' In addition to Rule lob-10 disclosures, broker-dealers have also placed many of the disclosures required
by Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board ('MSRB") Rule G-15 and boilerplate contractual provisions
particular to their individual firms on the back of these paperhard copy confirmations.
6
We derived this value by using the staffs own estimate of the cost of generating and sending a paper
confirmation - which is 91 cents. See 72 FR 6013 (February 8,2007) (Notice in the Federal Register
Soliciting Comment Regarding an Extension of Rule lob-10 Pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)). TradeSuite generates approximately 300 million confirmations a year. We
assumed that according to current practices in the securities industry that each TradeSuite confirmation sent
would generate a corresponding paper confirmation. We then multiplied 300 million by 91 cents to obtain
the sum of $273 million.
This estimate of the costs imposed by paper confirmation on the securities industry is supported by the
cost-benefit section of the recent release in which the Commission adopted amendments to the proxy rules
under the Exchange Act. In that release, the Commission estimated that soliciting parties spent in
aggregate $481.2 million in postage and printing fees alone to distribute paper proxy materials to beneficial
Ms. Paula R. Jenson
Page 3 of 7
March 11,2008
estimate, Omgeo did not take into account the costs that Customers incur in receiving,
reconciling and storing paper confirmations, which costs likely would add considerably
to this a m ~ u n t .A~ reduction in these costs could ultimately benefit our Broker-Dealer
Participants and their Customers.
Omgeo proposes to implement an enhancement to the TradeSuite electronic confirmation
message that will eliminate the need for Broker-Dealer Participants to send paper
confirmations. Specifically, Omgeo intends to enable each Broker-Dealer Participant to
enter into an Omgeo database the Rule 10b-10 information that it currently includes on
the back of its paper confirmations ("backside information") so these disclosures can be
~ Broker-Dealer Participant
quickly and efficiently communicated to ~ u s t o m e r s .Each
will be permitted to enter multiple disclosures in this database so that our Broker-Dealer
Participants may easily provide different disclosures for different types of securities
transactions - e.g., transactions involving equity securities or fixed income sec~rities.~
After the Broker-Dealer Participants have entered their disclosures into Omgeo's
database, Omgeo will provide each and every TradeSuite confirmation with the
appropriate backside information provided to us by the particular Broker-Dealer
Participant that is applicable to the specific transaction. Each TradeSuite confirmation
will be stamped with a URL so that Customers can enable the URL and view the
backside information; i.e., the appropriate TradeSuite confirmation message will be
linked to the appropriate disclosures for particular trades.'' In addition to viewing the
owners during the 2006 proxy season. See Exchange Act Release No. 56135 (July 26,2007) at Section
VI(C)(2).
'Significantly, the staff recognized the cost imposed on customers by paper confirmations when it first
addressed this issue in its 1974 letter granting relief to the DTC. See letter re: The Deuositorv Trust
Comuany (October 29, 1974) ("You indicate that eliminating the need for an additional confirmation,
which is now provided by participating ID broker-dealers, will reduce the costs not only of such ID brokerdealers but also of ID institutions.").
Omgeo intends to charge a fee for providing this service. However, the amount of this fee will be much
less than the amount its Broker-~ealkrparticipants cumently pay to print and send paper confirmations. As
a result, Customers who elect to use this service will be lowering their operating costs and be able to pass
these savings on to investors
Omgeo intends to allow Broker-Dealer Participants to provide disclosures in satisfaction of MSRB rule
(3-15 also. Omgeo will work with the MSRB to obtain appropriate relief, as necessaty, to allow Broker-
Dealer Participants to satisfy MSRB rule (3-15 by use of this service.
LO
The TradeSuite confirmations sent to Customers will disclose to the Customers the information in the
dedicated fields enumerated in footnote 4, supra. Those confirmations will also disclose the availability of
additional information relating to the transaction, which may be accessed by the Customer through the
URL link. The information that is made available through the URL link will be provided in a single,
contiguous form. Each TradeSuite confirmation, including the URL linkage, will contain all of the
information required by Rule lob-10.
Ms. Paula R. Jenson
Page 4 of 7
March 11,2008
applicable backside information for every trade executed on their behalf, Customers will
also have the ability to easily print such disclosure^.^^ Customers will not be required to
execute or re-execute a Mailed Confirmation Elimination Agreement as a condition to
employing the proposed services.12 Where a Customer to whom a confirmation must be
given or sent is other than a TradeSuite participant, Broker-Dealer Participants will
continue to have a responsibility to give or send trade confirmations to such Customers,
pursuant to Rule lob-10.
In addition to the cost savings, Omgeo's proposal provides other advantages to its
Broker-Dealer Participants and the Customers on the TradeSuite system. For example,
Omgeo's proposal will easily and quickly permit Broker-Dealer Participants to change
the required regulatory disclosures and the other disclosures that now appear on the back
of paper confirmations. This will permit broker-dealers to quickly and economically
come into compliance with applicable regulatory or legal changes, e.g.,rulemaking by
the Commission or a self-regulatory
an important enforcement action or
. organization,
settlement, or a decision by court regarding commercial contracts. It will also permit
them to efficiently correct any errors or deficiencies they discover in their current
regulatory disclosures or standard contract provisions, unlike changes to paper
confirmations which can require significant investments of time and money.
a
Prior Commission Action
Omgeo believes that its request to provide confirmations to Customers on behalf of its
Broker-Dealer Participants is similar to past no-action relief provided by the
Commission. l 3 As indicated above, the staff has permitted TradeSuite (through its
predecessor, DTC ID) to confirm securities transactions on behalf of DTC's brokerdealer participants since 1974 (including by wire transmission). l4 This relief was
I' Customers will have the ability to view, download and print confirmations. SEC and self-regulatory
organization examiners will be able to identify the disclosures provided by TradeSuite confirmations in
connection with specific transactions by referring to the URL linkage indicated on the confirmation for
each such transaction. Omgeo will retain copies of all such URL linkages and make them available to SEC
and self-regulatory organization examiners and Omgeo's Broker-Dealer Participants upon request for not
less than the time periods required for broker-dealers under Exchange Act Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4.
l 2 Customers that have not previously executed a Mailed Confirmation Elimination Agreement have
agreed to rely on the TradeSuite system for confirmations, which solely sends confirmations electronically.
Customers are able to download and print copies of the TradeSuite confirmations that have been sent
electronically.
l3
14
See e.g., letter re: Suneard Institutional Brokeraee Inc. (July 3,2007)
Letter re: The Deuositorv Trust Comoanv (October 29, 1974). In the original relief, the staff permitted
DTC to send the institutional customers solely the information customarily appearing on the front of the
confirmation (including the broker-dealer's capacity as principal or agent), while allowing the brokerdealers to agree with their institutional customers to incorporate by reference the information customarily
Ms. Paula R. Jenson
Page 5 of 7
March 11,2008
expanded nine years later, to explicitly permit DTC to send confirmations on behalf of its
broker-dealer participants through a variety of electronic means in satisfaction of Rule
lob-10, through its ID service.15 Omgeo now requests relief permitting it to send all of
the information required by Rule lob-10 to Customers electronically, by providing the
standardized information customarily appearing on the back of the paper confirmation
through an electronic linkage appearing on the electronic TradeSuite confirmation to
Omgeo's Internet website.
Omgeo's proposal is consistent with prior Commission interpretations on the electronic
delivery of confirmations to customers by broker-dealers generally. In 1996, the
Commission stated, in its electronic delivery release, that broker-dealers may deliver
confirmations electronically, with the informed consent of the customer, provided they
meet the basic requirements of notice, access and evidence of delivery.16 Under
Omgeo's proposal, the Customers, will consent to receiving confirmations electronically
through TradeSuite upon initially accepting the TradeSuite confirmations providing the
URL linkage. The Customers will receive electronic notice of the availability of
additional information through an electronic linkage to Omgeo's website when they view
their TradeSuite confirmations." They will have access to the information through an
Internet linkage on the electronic confirmation. Evidence of delivery may be reasonably
inferred because the confirmations will be sent to the address specified in writing by the
Customer. l8
Recent letters from the staff are consistent with Omgeo's proposal. First, in late 2006,
the staff issued a no-action letter to Omgeo that permitted certain trade information
provided by Omgeo's Central Trade Manager ("CTM") system to investment managers
to satisfy the confirmation requirements of Rule 10b-10.19in that letter the staff
appearing on the back of a paper confirmation by agreement, when transmitting confirmations by wire
transmission.
' I Letter re: The De~ositow
Trust Company (January 31, 1983). Moreover, in 1993 the staff issued no
action relief to a Thomson subsidiary, Thomson Financial Services, so that broker-dealers could rely on
electronic messages sent through the OASYS Global service to institutional clients to satisfy their
obligations under Rule lob-10. Letter re: Thomson Financial Services (October 8, 1993).
l6
Exchange Act Release No. 37182 (May 9, 1996)
" Omgeo sends TradeSuite confirmations to Customers at the location designated by the Customer),
through one of the media that Omgeo offers h.,
computer-to-computer, workstation). Confirmations are
sent to the Customers real-time, upon receipt of input by broker-dealer participants, throughout the trading
day. The Customers rehieve them as appropriate to review their trade executions and status.
'' See Letter re: Omgeo LLC (December 14, 2006).
Ms. Paula R. Jenson
Page 6 of 7
March 11.2008
determined, among other things, that broker-dealers could comply with Rule lob-10 by
inputting data into the CTM system, and that investment managers using this service
would obtain all of the information required for compliance with Rule lob-10 by
accessing CTM and downloading this data into their computer systems.20 Broker-dealers
using CTM were not required to send Rule lob-10 required information directly to
investment managers but instead were essentially allowed to post or load their Rule lob10 information onto the CTM database where investment managers would retrieve it.
In a second letter, the staff recently granted no-action relief to SunGard Institutional
Brokerage, permitting broker-dealers using the SunGard Transaction Network ("STN) to
provide electronic trade confirmations to users of STN for purposes of Rule lob-10.~'
SunGard's request for relief clearly stated that the STN would provide the information
that currently appears on the back of paper confirmations via electronic transrnissi~n.~~
Finally, the Commission has recognized that as technology drives change in the securities
industry it is obligated to adapt its regulations and interpretations to this ev~lution.~'
As
the staff recognized in the SunGard letter, communications technology has evolved to the
point where paper confirmations are no longer necessary, at least not for the institutions
that make up Omgeo's client base. The securities indusm and ultimately investors will
benefit if the staff provides assurances under Rule lob-10 because of the increased
operating efficiencies and costs savings our proposal will generate. We therefore
respectfully request that the staff grant our request.
We welcome the opportunity to discuss this request with you. If you have any questions
regarding this request, please call me at 212.855.3244 or our outside counsel, Jack
20
See id.
21
Letter re: SunGard Institutional Brokeras, Inc. (July 3,2007)
22
Id. Sungard stated that, among other things, the STN will do the following. "All of the information that
would normally appear on the back of a paper confirmation, including any additional disclosures that the
Dealer Participant broker-dealer user of STN] may wish to provide that are not required by Rule 1Oh-10,
will be provided with each confirmation." See also letter re: TradeWeb LLC (July 22,2003) (permitting
TradeWeb to send electronic confirmations for fixed-income securities transactions on behalf of brokerdealers).
2' Exchange Act Release No. 42728 (April 28,2000) at Section 2(D).
"We will continue to examine and
consider the removal of regulations that pose unnecessaty bai~iersto electronic commerce and maintain
those regulations that are essential to protect investors."
Ms. Paula R. Jenson
Page 7 of 7
March 11,2008
Drogin of Morgan, Lewis and Bockius at 202.739.5380. On behalf of Omgeo, we
appreciate the staffs consideration of this request.
Very trul yours,
A
General Counsel
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.