UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Agency decision

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 97854 / July 7, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-19831

In the Matter of

VEREIT, INC.,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPROVING PLAN

OF DISTRIBUTION AND

AUTHORIZING TRANSFER

OF FAIR FUND

On June 23, 2020, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the

“Commission”) issued an Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceeding Pursuant to Section 8A

of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making

Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order (the “Order”)1 against VEREIT, Inc. formerly

known as American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. (“ARCP” or “Respondent”), a real estate

investment trust (“REIT”), primarily engaged in the business of acquiring, owning, and

managing single-tenant commercial real estate properties. By February 2014 ARCP had grown

to be the nation’s largest publicly-traded net lease REIT. This proceeding arose from ARCP’s

violations of the antifraud and books and records provisions of the federal securities laws.

ARCP —acting through its then Chief Financial Officer, Brian S. Block ( “Block”), and its then

Chief Accounting Officer, Lisa McAlister (the “CAO”) —falsified its reported results and

manipulated the Company’s “Adjusted Funds from Operations” or “AFFO,” a key non-GAAP

performance metric relied on by ARCP management, investors, and analysts to assess ARCP’s

financial performance from at least May 2014 until the Company’s initial disclosure of their

misconduct on October 29, 2014. In addition to announcing the preliminary results of its internal

investigation which found intentional misconduct, ARCP also announced the resignations of

Block and the CAO at the request of the audit committee, and that the Company investigation

was ongoing and had been expanded to include fiscal year 2013 because Block and the CAO had

key roles in the preparation of such filings. The closing price of ARCP’s stock on the day of this

announcement, declined by approximately 19 percent from the prior day’s close.

The Commission ordered the Respondent to pay an $8,000,000 civil money penalty to the

Commission. The Commission also created a Fair Fund pursuant to Section 308(a) of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, so the penalty paid can be distributed to investors harmed by the

Respondent’s conduct described in the Order (the “Vereit Fair Fund”). Respondent ARCP has

1

Securities Act Rel. No. 10793 (June 23, 2020).

paid in full. The Fair Fund, comprised of the $8,000,000 paid by the Respondent, has been

deposited in a Commission-designed account at the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

Previously, on July 16, 2019, the Commission filed a complaint (the “Complaint”)

against AR Capital, LLC (“AR Capital”), Nicholas S. Schorsch (“Schorsch”), and Block

(collectively, the “Civil Action Defendants”). As alleged in the Complaint, AR Capital

sponsored and externally managed REITs, including ARCP and two publicly held, non-traded

REITs: American Realty Capital Trust III, Inc. (“T3”) and American Realty Capital Trust IV,

Inc. (“T4”). ARCP completed a merger with T3 in February 2013 and with T4 in January 2014.

The Complaint further alleged that contrary to shareholder disclosures, AR Capital, acting

through Block and Schorsch, inflated several aspects of incentive fees “that enriched the

Defendants at the expense of the REITs and their shareholders, and that Defendants made

additional related misstatements in subsequent ARCP public filings with the Commission,

including in quarterly and annual reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q. The Complaint also alleged

that Civil Action Defendants’ misleading presentation of agreements—purportedly for

purchasing furniture, fixtures, and equipment necessary for the respective T3 or T4-related postmerger operations and reimbursing AR Capital for certain “unreimbursed expenses”— in public

filings with the Commission, resulted in the Civil Action Defendants wrongfully obtaining at

least $7.27 million in unsupported compensation. The Complaint alleged the Civil Action

Defendants’ actions relating to these agreements also resulted in recording false entries on

ARCP’s books and records.

The Division of Enforcement (the “Division”) has concluded that the allegations in the

Civil Action’s Complaint and in this Administrative Proceeding both involve an underlying,

overarching fraudulent scheme by ARCP acting through Block. Importantly, the initial

disclosure of the AFFO fraud (the subject of the Administrative Proceeding settlement) is the

same date, October 29, 2014, used in the distribution plan approved by the Court in the Civil

Action (the “AR Capital Plan”). This disclosure related to a variety of matters impacted by

ARCP’s fraud. Given this confluence of violative conduct, it was not possible to disaggregate

the amount of inflation in ARCP’s market price based on each of the impacted matters. Thus, it

could not be determined with certainty or specificity what harm each investor incurred. As a

result of this uncertainty, the AR Capital Plan seeks to compensate all holders of ARCP

securities at the time of the disclosure who purchased or acquired shares at the time of the T3

merger or later, which would include those investors who purchased during the time of the

AFFO fraud. Because of this same uncertainty, it is fair and reasonable for the funds collected in

the Administrative Proceeding to be distributed through the Civil Action for distribution in

accordance with the Court’s approved AR Capital Plan.2 Further, a single distribution process is

a more efficient use of resources and allows the harmed investors to recover a greater portion of

their losses, than would two separate distribution processes.

This distribution should not be understood to compensate “holders” of securities, which the Commission has

traditionally not done. While this plan will result in distributions to investors who purchased ARCP securities

before the beginning of the AFFO fraud, it is the Commission staff’s belief that there was one overarching scheme

that encompassed both the AR Capital fraud and the AFFO fraud and these funds will be used to compensate victims

of that overall scheme, just as the Civil Action funds are currently being used.

2

2

On May 31, 2023, the Commission published a Notice of Proposed Plan of Distribution

and Opportunity for Comment (the “Notice”)3 pursuant to Rule 1103 of the Commission’s Rules

on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plan (the “Commission’s Rules”).4 The Notice advised

interested persons that they could obtain a copy of the proposed plan of distribution (“Proposed

Plan”) from the Commission’s public website at http://www.sec.gov/litigation/fairfundlist.htm or

by submitting a written request to Nancy Chase Burton, United States Securities and Exchange

Commission, 100 F. St. NE, Washington, D.C. 20549-5876.

The Notice also advised that all persons desiring to comment on the Proposed Plan could

submit their comments, in writing, no later than thirty (30) days from the date of the Notice (1) to

the Office of the Secretary, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street

NE, Washington, D.C. 20549-1090; (2) by using the Commission’s Internet comment form

(https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin.htm); or by sending an email to rule-comments@sec.gov.

The Commission received no negative comments on the Proposed Plan during the comment

period.

The Proposed Plan provides for the transfer of the Vereit Fair Fund, plus any accrued

interest, less any taxes and fees, to the Civil Action for distribution to harmed investors in

accordance with the AR Capital Plan approved by the Court.

The Division, therefore, now requests that the Commission approve the Proposed Plan as

published and authorize the transfer of the Vereit Fair Fund, less any taxes and expenses, to the

Civil Action for distribution to harmed investors in accordance with the AR Capital Plan

approved by the Court.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

A.

Pursuant to Rule 1104 of the Commission’s Rules, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1104, the

Proposed Plan is approved, and the approved Plan of Distribution shall be posted

simultaneously with this order on the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov; and

B.

In accordance with Rule 1102(a) of the Commission’s Rules, 17 C.F.R.

§ 201.1102(a), the Commission staff shall transfer the Vereit Fair Fund, plus any

accrued interest, less any taxes and fees, to the Civil Action for distribution to

harmed investors in accordance with the AR Capital Plan approved by Court.

By the Commission.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary

3

4

Exchange Act Rel. No. 97625 (May 31, 2023).

17 C.F.R. § 201.1103.

3

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.