UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Agency decision
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 95511 / August 17, 2022
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-17956
In the Matter of
MagnaChip Semiconductor
Corporation and Margaret HyeRyoung Sakai, CPA,
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
NOTICE OF PROPOSED PLAN OF
DISTRIBUTION AND
OPPORTUNITY FOR COMMENT
Respondents.
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 1103 of the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission’s (“Commission”) Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans
(“Commission’s Rules”), 17 C.F.R. § 201.1103, that the Division of Enforcement has submitted
to the Commission a proposed plan of distribution (the “Proposed Plan”) for the distribution of
monies paid in the above-captioned matter.
On May 1, 2017, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Public Administrative and
Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, Sections 4C
and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 102(e) of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and Cease-and-Desist Orders (the
“Order”)1 against MagnaChip Semiconductor Corporation and Margaret Hye-Ryoung Sakai,
CPA (collectively, the “Respondents”). In the Order, the Commission found that Respondents
violated the antifraud, books and records and internal control provisions of the federal securities
laws, when it began engaging in a variety of practices to inappropriately inflate its revenues and
meet the gross margin targets it previously had announced to the public. As a result,
MagnaChip’s financial statements and related disclosures were materially misstated in its
periodic, annual, and current reports filed with the Commission. MagnaChip also falsely stated
in an October 2013 press release that it had met its revenue and gross margin guidance for ten
consecutive quarters following its IPO. Following an internal investigation, MagnaChip selfreported the revenue issues and, as a result, MagnaChip restated its financial statements in early
2015, reducing its previously reported revenue for 2011 through 2013 by $121 million. The
Commission ordered the Respondents to pay a total of $3,135,000 in civil money penalties to the
Commission. The Commission also created a Fair Fund, pursuant to Section 308(a) of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, so the penalties paid can be distributed to harmed investors (the
“Fair Fund”).
1
Securities Act Rel. No. 10352 (May 1, 2017).
The Respondents have paid $3,134,999.99. The Fair Fund and has been deposited at the
United States Department of the Treasury’s Bureau of the Fiscal Service for investment, and any
accrued interest will be for the benefit of the Fair Fund.
OPPORTUNITY FOR COMMENT
Pursuant to this Notice, all interested persons are advised that they may obtain a copy of
the Plan from the Commission’s public website at http://www.sec.gov/litigation/fairfundlist.htm.
Interested persons may also obtain a written copy of the Proposed Plan by submitting a written
request to Allison Moon, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE,
Washington, DC 20549-5876. All persons who desire to comment on the Proposed Plan may
submit their comments, in writing, no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Notice:
1.
to the Office of the Secretary, United States Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090;
2.
by using the Commission’s Internet comment form
(http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin.shtml); or
3.
by sending an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov.
Comments submitted by email or via the Commission’s website should include “Administrative
Proceeding File No. 3-17956” in the subject line. Comments received will be publicly available.
Persons should submit only information they wish to make publicly available.
THE PROPOSED PLAN
The Net Available Fair Fund2 is comprised of the $3,134,999.99 in civil money penalties
paid by the Respondents, plus interest and income earned thereon, less taxes, fees, and expenses.
The Proposed Plan provides for the distribution of the Net Available Fair Fund to investors who
purchased Securities during the Relevant Period and suffered a Recognized Loss as calculated by
the methodology used in the Plan of Allocation in the Proposed Plan.
For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3
Vanessa A. Countryman
Secretary
2
All capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the same meanings ascribed to them in the Proposed
Plan.
3
17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(iii).
2
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.