Government Accountability Office — B 106190 6

Agency decision

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

m

t

.-0

+J

m

s

>

0

c5

.-w

cn

I

.

0

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

Contents

Page

AUTOMATED DATA AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE

Opportunities

for improving

management of local

FEDERAL SUPPLY SERVICE

Opportunities

for savings

in the procurement

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDSSERVICE

Ways to improve records management practices

ernment

PUBLIC BUILDINGS SERVICE

Participation

certificates

obtainable

for long-term

telephone

125

125

service

126

126

of tab paper

in the Federal

sold at higher interest

Government bonds

rates

128

Gov-

128

130

than those

VARIOUS DEPARTMENTSAND AGENCIES

Opportunities

for reducing the cost of constructing

and operating

health facilities

Improvement needed in use of formal advertising

procedures

for

procurement

Need for Federal agencies to improve solid waste management

practices

Differences

in administration

of relocation

assistance

program

Revisions

needed in financial

management policies

of the Federal

Government's

Automatic Data Processing

Fund

130

193

199

_

205

213

215

GENERAL

SERVICES

ADMINISTRATION

AUTOMATED DATA AND

TELECOMMUNICATIONS

SERVICE

Opportunities

for

of local

telephone

improving

'service

management

The Federal

Telecommunications

System

(FTS),

which

is managed

by the

General

Services

Administration

(GSA), provides,

among its many services,

intercity

and local

telephone

service.

As part

of this

telephone

service

GSA manages

over 400 switchboards

in the United

States.

At 153 of these

switchboards

GSA manages

4,634

local

service

trunks,

costing

an estimated

$989,000

annually.

Periodic

traffic

studies

provide

a measure

of the traffic

volume,

in part,

determine

the number

of local

service

trunks

required

at

which,

a switchboard.

However,

limitations

of these

studies

restricted

their

usefullness

to GSA's management

for achieving

optimum

economical

and efficient

service

and providing

it on an equal

basis

to all

customers.

GSA and telephone

company studies

(1) were not performed

at all

switchboard

locations,

(2) had not included

all

local

trunks

managed

by GSA

at each location,

and (3) sampling

periods

were too limited

at some locations.

Also,

telephone

company studies

were not frequent

enough

to disclose

seasonal

changes

and growth

or decline

trends.

The different

methods

used to convert

traffic

volume

into

trunk

requirements

produced

dissimilar

results

when applied

to the same statistics.

GAO estimated

that

one method

would require

78 fewer trunks-For example,

costing

$25,400

annually-than those proposed

by telephone

companies

using

However,

telephone

company

another

method

at 10 selected

switchboards.

reports

did not include

sufficient

detailed

information

for GSA to independently

evaluate

or recompute

the information.

GAO proposed

that

the Administrator

methods

and procedures

for determining

with

telephone

companies

for improved

(3) instruct

regional

offices

on the

conversion

to trunk

traffic

studies,

changes,

and (4) expand and implement

of GSA (1) establish

standard

trunk

requirements,

(2) negotiate

traffic

studies

and statistics,

evaluation

and/or

performance

of

requirements,

and implementation

of

internal

control

procedures.

GSA's response

to material

included

in this

report

was in general

agreement

with

GAO's findings.

GSA is currently

preparing

a report

of

(B-146864,

Mar. 19, 1973.)

actions

taken

in response

to this

report.

125

GENERAL

FEDERAL

SUPPLY

Opportunities

the procurement

SERVICES

ADMINISTRATION

SERVICE

for

of

savings

in

tab paper

GAO examined

into

the procedures

for procuring

marginally

punched,

continuous

forms

(tab paper)

because

an estimated

$100 million

is spent

annually

by the Government

for tab paper for use with

over 6,700

computers

at 1,700

locations.

GSA is responsible

for procuring

the Government's

tab paper but has

delegated

authority

to the Government

Printing

Office

(GPO) to procure

most

GSA purchases

and stocks

six commonly

used tab paper

of the tab paper.

forms.

GPO annually

awards contracts

against

which installations

place

within

prescribed

dollar

limitations,

for tab paper not available

orders,

from GSA stock.

The GPO contracts

are awarded

to all

responsive

suppliers

on a nationwide

basis.

GAO examined

fiscal

year 1971 tab paper purchases

of $6.5 million

that

The most favorable

prices

for tab paper were

were made by 45 installations.

obtained

by six installations

purchasing

their

tab paper

in volume

under

Prices

paid by the six installations

were about

competitive

contracts.

$500,000,

or 22 percent,

less than the lowest

prices

available

under

the

GPO contracts

for the same volume

of paper.

Most

year from

requirements

installations

procure

their

tab paper periodically

throughout

the

the GPO contracts

rather

than estimating

their

annual

tab paper

and purchasing

in volume

under competitive

contracts.

Although

installations

are required

to obtain

their

tab paper

from

the lowest

priced

supplier

under

the GPO contracts,

more than half

of the

installations

obtaining

tab paper under

the GPO contracts

had made purchases

from other

than the lowest

priced

supplier.

On total

orders

against

GPO

GAO found that

the prices

exceeded

those

of the

contracts

of $2.2 million,

If this

condition

is representative

lowest

priced

suppliers

by $54,000.

of all

reported

orders

against

GPO contracts

totaling

$11.8 million

for the

year ended November

1971,

the costs

of tab paper were $300,000

more than

if purchased

from the lowest

priced

sources.

In addition,

some installations

were purchasing

carbon

tab paper when narrow-carbon

paper may have

use.

Installations

used GPO contracts

to purchase

$600,000.

If narrow-carbon

paper had been adopted

$600,000

cost could

have been reduced

by $172,000,

To realize

the opportunities

for savings

in

Government's

tab paper

GAO suggested

that

GSA:

--Instruct

installations

to determine

and GSA or GPO use this

information

competitive

contracts

or authorize

contracts

directly.

126

higher

priced,

widebeen suitable

for their

wide-carbon

paper

costing

for use in all

cases,

the

or 28 percent.

the

procurement

of

the

their

annual

tab paper needs

to make volume

purchases

under

the installations

to award such

GENER4L SERVICES ADMINIST.RATION

FEDER4L SUPPLY SERVICE (continued)

in conjunction

with GPO, a more competitive

--Consider,

such as making awards of

awarding the GPO contracts,

used types of tab paper on a geographic

basis to the

offering

the lowest prices for each type of paper or

number of multiple

suppliers

to be awarded contracts

basis.

method of

the more commonly

single supplier

by limiting

the

on a nationwide

--Instruct

heads of departments

and agencies to establish

procedures

for systematic

monitoring

and internal

reviews of recent and ongoing

procurements

to identify

use of other than the lowest priced paper

suitable

for installations'

needs.

GSA agreed with our suggestions,

but GPO was concerned that the methods

GAO had proposed for awarding the GPO contracts

would not result

in more

competition

and lower prices.

GAO recognizes

that other alternatives

may

should be made to

be available.

GAO believes,

and GSA agrees, that efforts

develop a method of awarding the GPO contracts

under more competitive

conditions.

127

GENERAL

NATIONAL

ARCHIVES

Wavs to

uractices

imorove

records

in the Federal

SERVICES

ADMINISTRATION

AND RECORDS SERVICE

management

Government

GAO reviewed

the effectiveness

Service

(NARS) of GSA in improving

Government

because

of the substantial

preparation,

handling,

and storage.

costs

of paperwork

have increased

Similarly,

the Government's

record

cubic

feet

and now total

about

30

Records

Centers

are at an alltime

feet.

As a result,

storage

space

panded by 30 percent.

of the National

Archives

and Records

records

management

programs

throughout

the

increases

in the costs

of paperwork

GAO estimated

that,

since

1966,

Federal

from $8 billion

to $15 billion

a year.

holdings

have increased

by about

4 million

million

cubic

feet.

*Holdings

by Federal

high

and now total

over 11.5 million

cubic

has become critical

and may have to be ex-

NARS has had limited

success

in persuading

agencies

to correct

weaknesses

in their

records

management

programs.

One reason

is that

NARS

identifies

needed

improvements

and recommends

rather

sweeping

changes

without showing

corresponding

savings,

a factor

of vital

concern

to agency

management.

Another

reason

for the limited

success

is that

NARS has never

exercised

the authority

contained

in Public

Law 90-620

to report

to the

President,

the Congress,

or the Office

of Management

and Budget

(OMB),

a

particular

agency's

poor records

management

program,

even though

the NARS

evaluation

teams consistently

have found serious

weaknesses

in agencies'

programs.

In addition,

NARS could be more effective

in minimizing

the time

that

records

are stored

in Federal

Records

Centers

by establishing

closer

surby developing

a better

method

veillance

of agency records

control

schedules,

of evaluating

the validity

of the record

retention

periods

specified

by agenand through

better

procedures

for removing

from storage

those records

cies,

that

are eligible

for disposal.

GAO suggested

that

NARS and GSA:

--Point

out how agencies

NARS recommendations.

could

save

money

if

--Develop

criteria

describing

circumstances

nesses

or deficiencies

in agency records

President,

the Congress,

or OMB.

-- If

an agency fails

after

a reasonable

time

nesses

in its records

program

on the basis

form the President,

the Congress,

or OMB.

--Monitor

schedule

agencies

showing

more closely

to see that

retention

periods

for all

they

implement

when NARS would report

management

programs

to

to

of

correct

serious

this

criteria,

they maintain

their

records.

--Develop,

a method

to evaluate

on a pilot

basis,

at centers

and to provide

agencies

with

feedback

lishing

more realistic

retention

periods.

128

would

weakthe

weakthen in-

an up-to-date

records

usage patterns

as a basis

for estab-

GENERAL SERVICES

NATIONAL

ARCHIVES

AND RECORDS SERVICE

--Revise

procedures

at centers

are destroyed

promptly.

GSA and NARS have

suggestions.

(B-146743,

initiated

Aug.

13,

ADPIINISTRATION

(continued)

so that

a program

1973.)

129

records

to

implement

eligible

all

for

of

destruction

the

GAO

GENERAL

PUBLIC

BUILDINGS

Participation

at higher

obtainable

SERVICES

AD~IINISTRATION

SERVICE

certificates

interest

rates

for long-term

sold

than those

Government

bonds

Section

5 of Public

Law 92-313,

dated

June 16, 1972,

authorized

GSA

for 3 years to enter

into

purchase

contracts

with private

developers

who

GSA

would finance

and construct

public

buildings

to GSA specifications.

would make periodic

installment

payments

during

the contract

period

to

amortize

construction

and financing

costs.

At the end of the contract

period--not

to exceed 30 years--title

to the building

would transfer

to

the Government.

In sponsoring

Public

Law 92-313,

GSA asked the Congress

in 1971 for

purchase

contract

authority

for 3 years

as a stop-gap

expedient

that

would

eliminate

the construction

backlog

of about

60 projects

estimated

to cost

about

$750 million.

These projects

had been authorized

by the Congress

for Federal

construction

but had not been funded.

In addition

to the 60

buildings

authorized

by Public

Law 92-313,

GSA requested

approval

in

January

1973 for construction

and funding,

under purchase

contract

arrangeof three

Social

Security

Administration

payment

centers

estimated

to

ment,

cost

$110 million,

GSA has been obtaining

most of its

financing

through

the sale of 30year participation

certificates

by the GSA trustee,

the First

National

City Bank of New York.

At the time

GAO first

wrote

to GSA on February

27,

1973,

about

its method

of financing,

GSA had sold

$396 million

of participation

certificates.

By the end of March 1973,

GSA had sold another

issue

of certificates.

All

together

GSA has sold three

issues

of participation

certificates

amounting

to $522.5

million.

The first,

amounting

to $196.5

million,

was

sold in increments

from October

30 through

November

3, 1972, and had

interest

rates

varying

from 7.125 to 7.4 percent;

the second,

amounting

to

$200 million,

was sold on December

13, 1972,

and had an interest

rate

of

7.15 percent;

and the third,

amounting

to $126 million,

was sold on

The issues

were

March 14, 1973,

and had an interest

rate

of 7.5 percent.

sold at a total

discount

of about

$4.6 million,

which resulted

in an overall

effective

interest

rate

of 7.25 percent

on the first

and second

issues

and 7.90 percent

on the third

issue.

Public

Law 92-313

and its

legislative

history

are silent

concerning

the

The Comptroller

General

has

financing

with participation

certificates.

Also,

ruled,

however,

that

this

method

is within

the framework

of the law.

the Attorney

General

has advised

GSA that

the certificates

are general

obligations

of the United

States,

backed

by its

full

faith

and credit.

On the basis

of market

conditions

at the time

GSA participation

certificates

were issued,

GAO estimated

that

the Treasury

could

have issued

longterm Government

bonds for about

3/4 of 1 percent

less than the effective

interest

rate

for the certificates.

The additional

interest

costs

associated

with

the $522.5

million

of participation

certificates

is about

$3.92 million

a year,

which amounts

to $117.6

million

for the 30-year

term.

130

VARIOUS

DEPARTMENTS

AND AGENCIES

(Department

of Commerce;

Department

of

General

Services

Administration;

Department

Educat ion,

and Welfare;

Department

of

and Veterans

Administration)

Opportunities

constructing

for

reducing

and operating

Defense;

of Health,

Labor;

the cost

of

health

facilities

GAO undertook

a comprehensive

Pursuant

to a law enacted

by Congress,

study

of the costs

of constructing

and operating

health

facilities

and reported

to the Congress

on ways

to reduce

these

costs

for

facilities

built

GAO also

with

assistance

provided

under

the Public

Health

Service

Act.

examined

ways

in which

the demand for

facilities

could

be reduced

or

eliminated.

Constructing

operating

In

tunities

cilities,

fication

different

and

health

facilities

a November

1972 report

to the Congress,

GAO identified

many opporand operation

of health

fafor

improved

planning,

construction,

including

advance

analysis

of specific

health

care

needs,

identiof alternative

sources

of funds,

reuse

of building

designs,

and

construction

techniques.

Hospital

planners

generally

do not evaluate

on a life-cycle

basis

alternative

construction

techniques,

material,

designs,

and operating

systems.

Many hospital

administrators

and architects,

in efforts

to curb

the rising

cost

of hospital

construction,

search

for

obvious

savings

in

initial

construction.

These

initial

savings

often

preclude

later

savings

in operations

and maintenance

that

exceed

the initial

cost

savings.

initial

hospital

To demonstrate

construction

for

detailed

--Initial

as much

built.

--Life-cycle

incorporating

hospital.

the impact

that

certain

alternatives

and life-cycle

costs,

GAO selected

study.

The demonstration

showed

construction

as 8.6 percent

costs

the

costs

of the

lower

than

of as much

improvement

as

redesigned

those

of

$10.4

million

alternatives

the

would

have on

a recently

opened

that:

facility

facility

would

have

that

was

could

have been

into

the redesigned

saved

been

by

GAO recommended

that

the Secretary

of HEW (1) compile

and publish

information

on the essential

factors

to be considered

in project

planning,

(2) explore

the feasibility

of reusing

hospital

designs,

(3)

adopt

a common

set

of construction

requirements

for

HEW-administered

programs,

(4) develop

and disseminate

a scientific

base

of knowledge

on construction

requirements,

and (5) require

that

the fast-track

and total

concept

approaches

be considered

for

health

facility

projects

assisted

under

the Public

Health

Service

Act.

193

VARIOUS

DEPARTMENTS

AND AGENCIES

(Department

of Commerce;

Department

of

Administration;

Department

Gene ral Services

and Welfare;

Department

of

Education,

and Veterans

Administration)

Defense;

of Health,

Labor;

GAO also recommended

that

HEW establish

the capacity

to provide

lifecycle

cost data to health

facility

planners

and require

that

applicants

for

Federal

funding

justify

the use of construction

techniques,

materials,

designs,

and operating

systems

which differ

from those

recommended

by HEW.

GAO recommended

further

that,

until

HEW establishes

the capacity

to provide

life-cycle

cost data to health

facility

planners,

HEW should

encourage

planners

to consider

the information

presented

in this

report,

along

with

in identifying

the alternatives

for

local

operating

conditions

and costs,

life-cycle

analysis

that

are likely

to be the most appropriate

for inclusion

in the facility.

Demand

facility

for

health

construction

GAO also

identified

and studied

ways in which health

facility

construction

could

be avoided

by either

reducing

the demand for such facilities

or

increasing

the productivity

of existing

facilities.

The study

showed that

the demand for hospitals

and, to a lesser

extent,

other

health

care facilities

could

be reduced

and that,

by more efficiently

using

existing

facilities,

millions

of dollars

in construction

costs would not need to be spent.

These results

could

be attained

by (1) placing

greater

emphasis

on preventive

medicine,

(2) making

more appropriate

use of various

types of health

care facilities,

(3) increasing

the use of more efficient

and economical

medical

care delivery

systems,

(4) using

more effective

utilization

review

techniques,

(5) changing

health

insurance

incentives

that

emphasize

inpatient

care,

(6) sharing

more hospital

services,

(7) organizing

more efficient

and economical

health

care systems,

and (8) strengthening

the role

and

increasing

the capabilities

of areawide

health

planning

agencies.

GAO made a number

of recommendations

to the Secretary

of HEW calling

for these

changes.

In implementing

these

changes,

GAO recommended

that HEW

solicit

the cooperation

of other

Government

agencies,

private

health

organizations,

and medical

professionals

and assume leadership

in these

areas.

Some health

care providers

have changed

traditional

health

care demand

and utilization

patterns,

decreasing

the need to construct

acute

care and

other

types of health

facilities.

The economic

benefits

emanating

from

these

changes

and the means by which such changes

have been effected,

as

discussed

in GAO’s report,

should

be of particular

interest

to the Congress.

Accordingly,

GAO recommended

that

the Congress

consider

these matters

when

it considers

legislative

health

care proposals,

such as those providing

for

the reorganization

of the existing

health

care delivery

system

and for

programs

on national

health

insurance.

194

VARIOUS

DEPARTMENTS

(Department

Administration,

Improvement

advertising

needed

in

procedures

AND AGENCIES

of Defense,

General

Services

and Tennessee

Valley

Authority)

use of formal

for procurement

GAO reviewed

DOD, GSA, and the Tennessee

Valley

Authority

(TVA)

procedures

and practices

in using

formal

advertising

for bids

in order

to (1)

identify

problems

limiting

competition

and increasing

Government

costs

and

(2) offer

suggestions

to the agencies

for more effective

and less

costly

use

of this

method

of procurement.

GAO examined

138 contracts

by 8 procurement

offices

of

been solicited

but that

only

three

contracts

were

awarded

the low response

follow.

--Bidders

veal

lists

were

relatively

the

--Previous

bidders

--Advertising

lished

elicit

in

description

bids.

awarded

under

formal

advertising

procedures

these

agencies

and found

that

8,956

suppliers

8 percent

of them had submitted

bids.

Fiftyon the basis

of three

or fewer

bids.

Causes

based

on broad

categories

few sources

capable

of

were

the

not

regularly

for

the low

for

future

number

of

procurements.

--Restrictive

repeatedly.

specifications

or

--The

complexity

--Bidders

--Bids

were

were

Administrative

lists

of bidders;

ing,

and analyzing

because

:

--41

percent

tion

than

--About

visions

of

not

bids

were

purchase

reitem.

was not

required

pub-

not

given

time

to

minor

discrepancies.

rejected

because

of

suppliers

for

more

than

two

copies

bid

(IFBs)

the

one

IFBs were

solictitation

of

199

to

to

increase

were

used

from

bidding.

bid.

costs

of formal

advertising

include

preparing

and mailing

invitations;

bids.

Opportunities

for

reducing

more invitations

were

used.

timely

and the

was insufficient

evaluated

descriptions

discouraged

50 percent

of the pages

in

which

were

repeated

from

--Furnishing

unnecessary.

of items

and did not

bidding

for

a specific

invitations

enough

of

solicited.

Commerce

Business

Daily

of supplies

or services

--The

causes

competition

had

the

IFB

costs

of maintaining

and receiving,

recordthese

costs

were

evident

were

to

prepared

for

distribu-

standard

contract

to another.

pro-

the

was

firms

solicited

VARIOUS DEPARTMENTSAND AGENCIES

(Department

Administration,

--92

percent

of Defense, General Services

and Tennessee Valley Authority)

of the solicitations

mailed

GAO believes

that, if DOD and the civil

they could

for correcting

these conditions,

annually.

to firms

did not result

in bids.

agencies adopt its suggestions

save several million

dollars

GAO recommended that DOD and GSA, the major

instruct

procurement

offices

procurement

policy,

agencies responsible

and agencies to:

--Establish

a program in each procurement

office

to selectively

the extent of competition

achieved under formal advertising

aggressive

action to stimulate

competition

where it appears

restricted.

for

review

and take

to be

--Establish

a work simplification

program in each procurement

agency to

(1) solicit

only previous

bidders or suppliers

and firms that request

the requireIFBs, (2) simplify

and shorten IFBs, and (3) reevaluate

ments for distributing

IFBs.

Comments on GAO’s recommendations

and suggestions

were obtained

GSA, TVA, and the Small Business Administration

(SBA).

from DOD,

DOD and GSA agreed in general with GAO on the problems found but did not

‘Both agencies.were

concerned about

always agree with the recommendations.

the additional

regulation

and control

that GAO seemed to be suggesting.

GSA

said that these problems could be solved by educating

personnel

at the operating levels of procurement.

DOD said many of the suggestions

had been considered previously,

would be costly,

would add to procurement

time, and would

create additional

paperwork.

TVA said it did not have the problems discussed in this report.

SBA

officials

agreed with GAO on the problems and solutions

suggested.

They

wanted it clearly

stated that GAO’s suggestions

should not be construed to

mean the discontinuance

of various

programs to assist small business participation in Government procurement,

a point in which GAO concurred.

GAO agreed with GSA that educating personnel

is necessary to implement

sound administration.

But GAO believes

the agencies should achieve more

genuine competition

in formal bidding

at lower administrative

costs and

reiterated

its recommendation

to establish

programs within

each major procurement agency to increase competition

and simplify

formal advertising.

(B-176418, Aug. 14, 1973.)

VARIOUS

DEPARTMENTS

AND AGENCIES

(Department

of the Interior,

Department

of

Agriculture,

Department

of Defense,

and

the General

Services

Administration)

Need

solid

for

Federal

agencies

to improve

waste

management

practices

Federal

legislation

and Executive

orders

have stressed

the importance

of proper

solid

waste

disposal,

resource

recovery,

waste

reduction,

and the

Federal

agencies’

responsibilities

for providing

leadership

in the nationwide effort

to protect

and enhance

the quality

of the environment.

To

determine

how well

Federal

agencies

were

fulfilling

their

responsibilities,

GAO reviewed

disposal

policies

and practices

of those

agencies--Bureau

of

Land Management,

Forest

Service,

National

Park

Service,

and the Department

of the Army--that

managed

the bulk

of the Federal

land having

disposal

sites.

Federal

regulations

generally

prohibit

Federal

agencies

from

burning

but GAO reported

widespread

wastes

in open fires

and from using

open dumps,

open burning

and open dumping

on Federal

lands

administered

by the Bureau

of Land Management,

the Forest

Service,

and the National

Park

Service.

The Army generally

was satisfactorily

disposing

of its

unsalvageable

wastes.

The agencies

generally

lacked

a systematic

GAO recommended

solve

waste

disposal

problems.

Agriculture

and the Interior

direct

the Forest

and National

Park

Service

to:

agement,

--Establish,

ters

for

at

solid

the various

organizational

waste

matters.

--Establish

procedures

so that

communicated

effectively

to

adequate

policy

guidance

to

officials

effectively

carry

--Require

periodic

(1) agency-operated

on Federal

land

vate

land.

approach

to identify

that

the Secretaries

Service,

Bureau

of

levels,

and

of

Land Man-

responsihility

cen-

(1) solid

waste

management

policies

are

all

officials,

(2) headquarters

provides

regional

personnel,

and (3) regional

out agency

policies.

inspections

and reporting

of inspection

results

of

and lesseeand permittee-operated

disposal

sites

and (2) disposal

sites

used by the agencies

on pri-

GAO reviewed

also

GSA’s

and the Army’s

procurement,

resource

recovery,

and recycling

policies

and practices

and reported

that

both

agencies

had

recovered

some wastes

for

reuse

or recycling

but could

recover

many more.

Generally

the Army was recovering

wastes

only

when it was economically

it gave little

consideration

to salvaging

and recycling

priadvantageous;

marily

for

environmental

benefits.

should

GAO recommended

be aware

of,

that

GSA and the Army,

and should

emphasize

to

205

in their

procurement

their

suppliers,

the

activities,

VARIOUS DEPARTMENTSAND AGENCIES

(Department

of the Interior,

Department of

Agriculture,

Department of Defense, and

the General Services Administration)

environmental

or recyclable

benefits

materials,

that could be obtained through

containers,

and packaging.

using

more reusable

The agencies generally

agreed with GAO's findings

and recommendations

and specified

steps they were taking to implement the recommendations.

(B-166506, Oct. 26, 1972.)

4

206

VARIOUS

DEPARTMENTS

(Office

of Management

and Budget,

of Housing

and Urban Development,

Differences

relocation

in administration

assistance

program

AND AGENCIES

Corps of Engineers,

Department

and Department

of Transportation)

of

The Uniform

Relocation

Assistance

and Real Property

Acquisition

Policies

Act of 1970 provides

for uniform

and equitable

treatment

of persons

displaced

from their

homes,

businesses,

or farms by Federal

and federally

It also established

uniform

and equitable

land acquisiass isted

programs.

tion

policies

for such programs.

At the request

of the Chairman,

Subcommittee on Intergovernmental

Relations,

Senate

Committee

on Government

Operations,

GAO reviewed

Federal,

State,

and local

agencies’

progress

in implementing

the act in Missouri,

California,

Wisconsin,

and Pennsylvania.

GAO reported

that

OMB; the Corps of Engineers;

the Department

of Housing and Urban Development;

and the Federal

Highway

Administration,

Department of Transportation,

had (1) assisted

the States

in enacting

legislation

authorizing

their

participation

in federally

assisted

programs

causing

relocation

and (2) made progress

in identifying

and resolving

agencies’

differences

in the way relocation

payments

and services

were being

provided;

but the relocation

program

could

be better

administered

and payments

could

be made more uniform.

In January

1971 the President

directed

OMB to establish

and head an

interagency

task force

to develop

guidelines

for all

agencies

in preparing

procedures

covering

each agency’s

specific

programs.

OMB also was directed

to establish

and head a relocation

assistance

advisory

committee

to continually

review

agencies’

relocation

programs

to recommend

improvements

and, if

needed,

proposals

for legislation.

The task force

issued

interim

guidelines

in February

1971 and revised

guidelines

in May 1972.

As of January

1973,

the advisory

committee

had identified

12 major

differences

in agency guidelines

and obtained

agreement

from the agencies

to resolve

the majority

of

them.

GAO noted

instances

information

on relocation

--delays

in

enacting

--a

of

timely

lack

in which

benefits

displaced

available

persons

under

State

legislation

and/or

actions

by local

displacing

did not receive

timely

the new act because

of

offices.

Relocation

payments

generally

were computed

according

lines;

however,

because

more than one method

was permitted

method was not used by local

displacing

offices

in a given

with

similar

housing

needs did not receive

similar

payments.

the agencies

differed

in determining:

to OMB guideand the same

area,

displacees

For example,

--Differential

housing

payments

for homeowners,

Local

displacing

offices

in the same area used different

methods

to establish

the

reasonable

cost of a replacement

house comparable

to the one being

acquired

by the Government.

213

VARIOUS

of

DEPARTMENTS

(Office

of Management

and Budget,

Housing

and Urban Development,

AND AGENCIES

Corps of Engineers,

Department

and Department

of Transportation)

--Differential

rental

payments.

Local

displacing

offices

how much,

if any, of a displaced

person's

income

should

in computing

the payment

and whether

the payment

should

actual

rent paid

for the replacement

house or the rental

comparable

replacement

housing.

--Downpayments.

Some local

displacing

offices

limited

amount

needed

for a conventional

loan on a comparable

other

offices

paid

the amount needed

for a conventional

house purchased.

differed

in

be considered

be based on

amount

for

payments

to the

house while

loan on the

OMB generally

concurred

with GAO's findings

and conclusions

and said

the agencies

agreed,

in principle,

with

the major

differences

reported

and

were developing

detailed

instructions

to correct

them.

In addition,

OMB

said

that

the interagency

task force

responsible

for resolving

agencies'

legal

and procedural

differences

was making

excellent

progress

in identifying and resolving

differences.

After

transferred

this

to

report

was issued,

OMB's relocation

GSA.

(B-148044,

June 7, 1973.)

214

responsibilities

were

VARIOUS

DEPARTMENTS

AND AGENCIES

(Office

of Management

and Budget

General

Services

Administration)

Revisions

needed

in financial

management

policies

of the Federal

Government's

Automatic

Data Processing

and

Fund

GAO examined

the management

policies

(ADP) Fund's

equipment

lease program

to

administered

as intended

by the law and

ing economies

in acquiring

ADP equipment.

of the Automatic

Data Processing

determine

whether

the fund is being

is effectively

assisting

in achiev-

The Fund is an important

tool

for acquiring

the Government's

ADP equipment economically

and leasing

it to agencies.

However,

certain

Fund policies

should

be revised

to comply

with

the intent

of Public

Law 89-306

and with

the accounting

principles

prescribed

by the Comptroller

General

for use by

Federal

agencies.

will

lion.

ized

Equipment

purchased

by the Fund for $19.1 million,

as of March 31, 1972,

enable

the Government

to avoid

commercial

rent payments

of $38.7 milThe equipment

which the Fund purchased

for $19.1 million

was capitalat $22.7 million.

GAO believes

that:

--Augmenting

the Fund with the $3.6

ization

of purchased

equipment

in

with a provision

that

Fund capital

the value

of equipment

transferred

million

attributable

to the capitalexcess of costs

is not in accordance

be composed

of appropriations

and

to the Fund.

--Revaluing

trary

to

agencies.

amounts

greater

than

prescribed

for use

purchased

equipment

at

the accounting

principles

--Since

the amounts

capitalized

are recovered

through

the capitalization

policies

for purchased

equipment

in charges

to users

that

are contrary

to a requirement

89-306

that

charges

approximate

the cost met by the

cost is conby Federal

lease

charges,

have resulted

of Public

Law

Fund.

Agencies

have also been required

to pay an additional

10 percent

of the

equipment's

capitalized

value

to provide

for anticipated

losses

due to the

The effect

of this

charge

and its

early

termination

of equipment

leases.

accounting

treatment

has been to recognize

losses

before

they are incurred

and to unnecessarily

increase

user charges.

GAO suggested

that

OMB and GSA revise

the Fund's

equipment

capitalization

policies

to insure

compliance

with

Public

Law 89-306

and improve

the

to the extent

practicable,

those policies

which

Fund's

image by revising,

are objectionable

to the agencies.

OMB and GSA were receptive

OMB nor GSA favored

elimination

to

of

most of GAO's

the 10 percent

215

suggestions,

charge

for

but neither

anticipated

VARIOUS DEPARTMENTSAND AGENCIES

(Office

of Management and Budget and

General Services Administration)

However, OMB and GSA have reduced

losses due to early lease terminations.

the charge from 10 percent to 3 percent and are considering

alternative

(B-115369, Apr. 17, 1973.:

accounting

approaches for recovery

of such losses.

216

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.