Case law

State Ex Rel. Brown v. Board of Education of St. Louis

294 Mo. 106 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 22, 1922

[State v. Eckhart, 232 Mo. 49, 53 .] … Moreland, 256 Mo. 683, 692 ; State ex rel. v. Knott, 207 Mo. 167 ; State ex rel. v. Johnson, 138 Mo. App. 306, 313-314 ; 11 C. J. p. 134, par. 96.] The judgment is reversed and tbe cause remanded.

Brown v. Board of Adjustment

469 S.W.2d 844 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1971

v. … In effect, this overruled a previous yardstick of measure set forth in Brown v.

State Ex Rel. Brown v. Board of Education

299 Mo. 465 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 2, 1923

Louis, praying for a writ of certiorari commanding the members of the Board of Education and the Superintendent of Instruction of that city to certify the record of Section 1, Rule 47, of the Board of Education of the city … Examination for appointment shall be conducted by the superintendent, under regulations to be made by the board.”

Brown v. Personnel Advisory Board of the State

879 S.W.2d 581 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 1994

On August 14, 1987, Brown made application for appeal to the Missouri Personnel Advisory Board (PAB). The PAB held an evidentiary hearing to determine if it had jurisdiction to hear the appeal. … Id. at 76-77 (citing; Morris v. Division of Probation and Parole, 651 S.W.2d 545, 546 (Mo.App.1983)).

Richard Brown v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole

517 S.W.3d 24 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 2016

The Board determined that Brown's minimum term for second-degree assault is twenty months. Pursuant to the Board's calculation, Brown would become parole eligible in October 2020. … Indeed, the provisions of Section 217.690 give the Board "'almost unlimited discretion.'" Cole v. Mo. Bd. of Prob. & Parole, 947 S.W.2d 124, 125 (Mo. App. 1997) (quoting State ex rel. Cavallaro v.

Brown v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City

698 S.W.2d 554 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 1985

Appeal from summary judgment in favor of Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Kansas City, Missouri, and Codes Administration Division of the Public Works Department of Kansas City, Missouri, and against Arthur Brown

Brown v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

782 S.W.2d 655 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 1989

Appellant, Arthur Brown, appeals from a decision of the Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, Missouri (BZA). … Stickelber v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 442 S.W.2d 134, 137 (Mo.App.1969).

Chryl Brown v. State Board of Accountancy, Respondent/Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 2019

Gott v. Dir. of Revenue, 5 S.W.3d 155, 157 (Mo. banc 1999). … Wasem v. Mo. Dental Bd., 405 S.W.2d 492, 497 (Mo. App. St.L. 1966).

State v. Brown

840 S.W.2d 247 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1992

Ralls County Mutual Insurance Co. v. RCS Bank

314 S.W.3d 792 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 2010

Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). Technically, constructive trusts are not trusts at all, but equitable devices employed by courts of equity. Brown v. Brown, 152 S.W.3d 911, 916 (Mo.App. W.D.2005). … (quoting Schultz v.

Harrison v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.

607 S.W.2d 137 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 9, 1980

V, § 10. … Under the rule of statutory construction that “the express mention of one thing implies the exclusion of another”, Brown v.

Brown v. Brown

423 S.W.3d 784 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 11, 2014

Brown v. Brown, 362 S.W.3d 508 (Mo.App.2012). In February 2012, Ms. Hendrix filed a motion with the trial court asking the court to order payment of fees to the guardian ad litem for services rendered on appeal. … Niederkorn v.

Brown v. Brown

530 S.W.3d 35 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 2017

Pearson v. Koster, 367 S.W.3d 36, 44 (Mo.banc 2012) (citing White v. Dir. of Revenue, 321 S.W.3d 298, 308-9 (Mo. banc 2010)). … Anderson v. State, 402 S.W.3d 86, 92 (Mo.banc 2013) (citing Worthington v. State, 166 S.W.3d 566, 579 (Mo. banc 2005)).

Thompson v. Committee on Legislative Research

932 S.W.2d 392 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 18, 1996

Buechner v. Bond, 650 S.W.2d 611, 612 (Mo. banc 1983). Every word in a constitutional provision is assumed to have effect and meaning; their use is not meaningless surplusage. Id. at 613 . 5 . Brown v. … See Bohrer v.

Brown v. Brown

362 S.W.3d 508 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 2012

Brown appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting his Family Access Motion and motions for contempt and to modify child support, but denying his motion to modify child custody. … Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976), and is not an abuse of discretion, Andrews v. Andrews, 344 S.W.3d 749, 749 (Mo.App. E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value.

Brown v. Brown

45 Mo. 412 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1870

Brown, under a purchase from the latter’s administrator in October, 1855, for the consideration of $2,025. … Ev., § 307; Adams on Eject., by Tillinghast, p. 248; Merchants’ Bank v. Harrison, 39 Mo. 433 .)

Brown v. Brown

537 S.W.2d 434 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 18, 1976

Anderson v. Robertson, 402 S.W.2d 589, 593 [3, 4] (Mo.App.1966); Biggs v. Biggs, supra. … Franklin v. Franklin, 283 S.W.2d 483, 485 [6] (Mo. banc 1955); Fawkes v. Fawkes, 204 S.W.2d 132, 134 (Mo.App.1947).

Benoit v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission

33 S.W.3d 663 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2000

Brown v. Hamilton Ins. Co., 956 S.W.2d 417, 419 (Mo.App.1997). … See Wilmer v. Board of County Comm’rs, 916 F.Supp. 1079, 1080-81 (D.Kan.1996); State Highway Admin, v. Kim, 358 Md. 313 , 726 A.2d 238, 246 (1999); Lienhard v.

Brown v. Brown

209 Mo. App. 416 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1922

as to the allowance of alimony and maintenance, as may be proper. ... ” This court has heretofore directly ruled that the judgment awarding alimony is in a manner an interlocutory judgment changeable at any time (Francis v. … [Wald v. Wald, 168 Mo. App. 377 , 151 S. W. 786 .] In Meyers v. Meyers, 91 Mo.

Brown v. Brown

152 S.W.3d 911 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 18, 2005

Brown and Pamela K. Heitman (“John” and “Pam” or “Respondents”). 1 Appellant raises three points of trial court error. … , John Brown and Pam K.