Opinion

Brown v. Brown

  • 362 S.W.3d 508
  • 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 406
  • 2012 WL 1032964
Court
Missouri Court of Appeals
Filed
Mar 27, 2012
Status
Published
On the bench
Ahrens, Richter, Gaertner
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 73.4%

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony T. Brown appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting his Family Access Motion and motions for contempt and to modify child support, but denying his motion to modify child custody. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the trial court’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and does not erroneously declare

*509

the law,

Murphy v. Carron,

536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976), and is not an abuse of discretion,

Andrews v. Andrews,

344 S.W.3d 749, 749 (Mo.App. E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2011).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.