Case law

Jubilee Housing, Inc. v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority

774 A.2d 281 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 2001

See District of Columbia v. Gallagher, 734 A.2d 1087, 1090 (D.C.1999). II. We begin with the applicable legal principles. We look first to the plain meaning of the statute. As we said in J. Parreco & Son v. Rental Hous. … See Duke City Lumber Co. v. Butz, 382 F.Supp. 362, 372 (D.D.C.1974), 9 aff'd on other grounds, 176 U.S.App. D.C. 218, 539 F.2d 220 (1976), cert. denied sub nom, Duke City Lumber Co. v.

United States v. Smithen

738 F. Supp. 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 25, 1990

See United States v. Winston, 892 F.2d 112, 117 (D.C.Cir.1989); United States v. Baskin, 886 F.2d 383, 386-87 (D.C.Cir.1989). … In Schneckloth v.

United States Institute of Peace v. Kenneth Jackson

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 2025

Seila Law LLC v. CFPB, 140 S. Ct. 2183, 2206 (2020). … That harm outweighs any harm the removed board members may face. Trump v. Wilcox, 145 S.

Farley v. United States

694 A.2d 887 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 1997

Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 441 , 115 S.Ct. 1555, 1569 , 131 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995). In this context, “[a] ‘reasonable probability’ is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” United States v. … Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). .

Johnson v. United States

562 A.2d 603 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1989

U.S. v. McIlwain, 427 F.Supp. 358 (D.D.C.1977). … See also U.S. v. Liddy, 397 F.Supp. 947, 949 (D.D.C.1975), aff'd, 530 F.2d 1094 (D.C.Cir.1976).

District of Columbia v. Jones

38 App. D.C. 560 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 22, 1912

Knox County v. Ninth Nat. Bank, 147 U. S. 91 — 97, 37 L. ed. 93—95, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 267; Nofire v. United States, 164 U. S. 657 -660, 41 L. ed. 588-590, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 212; Guthrie Nat. Bamk v. Guthrie, 173 U. … Pillsbury v. Brown, 82 Me. 453 , 9 L.R.A. 94 , 19 Atl. 858 ; Thomas v. Ford, 63 Md. 346 , 52 Am. Rep. 513 ; Blossom v. Cannon, 14 Mass. 177 ; Langdon v. State, 23 Neb. 509 , 37 N. W. 79 . In Nealy v.

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. FDA

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 24, 2012

For this reason, the court’s invocation of noncommercial compelled speech cases like Wooley v. Maynard, 430 U.S. 705 (1977), West Virginia State Board of Education v. … Brown v. Entm’t Merchs. Ass’n, 131 S. Ct. 2729, 2733 (2011) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

Washington Area Carpenters' Welfare Fund v. Overhead Door Co.

488 F. Supp. 816 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 22, 1980

See Lewis v. Benedict Coal Corp., 361 U.S. 459 , 80 S.Ct. 489 , 4 L.Ed.2d 442 (1960) (union breached contract by striking); Huge v. … Huge v. Long’s Hauling Co., at 465.

Mallgren v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 9, 2025

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668- 71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Here, Plaintiff’s ambiguous allegations fall well short of providing notice of any claim or establishing this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction.

Alphonso Marcus v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U. S. Department of Labor

548 F.2d 1044 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 28, 1976

The findings of fact in the decision under review by the Board shall be conclusive if supported by substantial evidence in the record considered as a whole. 33 U.S.C. § 921 (b)(3) (Supp. V, 1975). … See also Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp. Programs, 542 F.2d 602, 605-06 (3d Cir. 1976); Offshore Food Service, Inc. v. Benefits Review Board, 524 F.2d 967, 968 (5th Cir. 1975). 17 .

Davis v. D.C. Department of Corrections

623 F. Supp. 2d 77 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 2009

See Johnson v. … V 8c. 5 .

Potomac Iron Works v. Love

673 F.2d 537 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 19, 1982

Likewise, in the case of a formal hearing, appeal is to the Board. Id. The Board, in either circumstance, has jurisdiction in cases raising “a substantial question of law or fact.” Id. … Bradshaw v. McCarthy, Inc., 3 B.R.B.S. 195, B.R.B. Nos. 75-209 and 75-209A (January 26, 1976). The instant case is not a case in which attorney’s fees were awarded.

Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co. v. Order of Railway Conductors & Brakemen

265 F. Supp. 892 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 4, 1967

of Locomotive Engineers v. … until the Board acts.

Yvonne C. Edwards v. Nathan Habib

397 F.2d 687 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 11, 1968

’ ban of Brown was in reprisal for his participation in the voter registration drive. … See United States v. Beaty, supra Note 5; United States v. Bruce, supra Note 5. See also United States v. Board of Education of Greene County, Miss., 5 Cir., 332 F.2d 40 (1964); L’Orange v.

In Re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation

725 F.3d 244 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 9, 2013

Before: GARLAND, Chief Judge, BROWN, Circuit Judge, and SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judge. … BROWN, Circuit Judge: Over the last decade, the four major freight railroads imposed rate-based fuel surcharges on shipments over their tracks.

Weems v. Cushwa

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 17, 2021

Parole Board (“Board”) conducted parole hearings for individuals sentenced under the D.C. Code. Bailey v. Fulwood, 793 F.3d 127, 130 (D.C. Cir. 2015). … Price v. Barry, 53 F.3d 369, 370 (D.C. Cir. 1995). And under the 1987 Regulations, “parole is never ‘required after the Board determines that the necessary prerequisites exist.’” Ellis v.

Qualls v. Rumsfeld

357 F. Supp. 2d 274 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 7, 2005

Cinciarelli v. Carter, 662 F.2d 73, 78 (D.C.Cir.1981); Woodrick v. Hungerford, 800 F.2d 1413, 1416 (5th Cir.1986); Pence v. Brown, 627 F.2d 872, 874 (8th Cir.1980); Castle v. … Caldera, 74 F.Supp.2d 4, 8-9 (D.D.C.1999) (citing numerous cases); Brown v.

Crews v. United States

369 A.2d 1063 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1977

See Brown v. Illinois, supra, 422 U.S. at 608-12 , 95 S.C.t. 2254 (Powell, J., concurring in part); see also Clemons v. … See Brown v. Illinois, supra note 4, 422 U.S. at 600 n. 5, 95 S.Ct. 2254 . In Stone v.

Beedy v. District of Columbia

126 F.2d 647 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 1942

Prior to the Board’s decision in this case we had decided Sweeney v. … See cases cited in footnote 6 in the Murphy case, and see also Anderson v. Watt, 138 U.S. 694, 706 , 11 S.Ct. 449 , 34 L.Ed. 1078 ; Gilbert v. David, 235 U. S. 561, 569 , 35 S.Ct. 164 , 59 L.Ed. 360 ; Williamson v.

JOSEPHINE REYES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES

150 A.3d 1277 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 2016

Fluellyn v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 54 A.3d 1156, 1159 (D.C. 2012) (quoting Mills v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 838 A.2d 325, 328 (D.C. 2003)); D.C. … Code § 1-623.24 (b)(1). 3 See generally MorphoTrust USA, Inc. v.