Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

2.13s

  • Edwin I. Hatch v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

    654 F.2d 825 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 1981

    E. g., Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. Wichita Board of Trade, 412 U.S. 800, 806-17 , 93 S.Ct. 2367, 2374-79 , 37 L.Ed.2d 350 (1973) (citing inter alia SEC v. … Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. Wichita Board of Trade, 412 U.S. 800, 807 , 93 S.Ct. 2367, 2374 , 37 L.Ed.2d 350 (1973), and NLRB v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

    Cited 97 timesPublished
  • Harrison v. Boyd

    11 F. Cas. 647 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · May 15, 1832

    Cox, for the plaintiffs, also cited the case of Harrison v. Gales, special bail of Gilbert C. Russell, in this Court at December term, 1828, ( 3 Cranch, C. C. 376 ,) and Farrow v. … Brown, special bail of Russell, at thp same term; where the plaintiff was a resident of Virginia at the time of Russell’s discharge under the insolvent act of this district, and had then a suit against Russell, pending in

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

    824 F.2d 94 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 28, 1987

    See Intervenors’ Motion to Dismiss at 4-5; see also Midland Insurance Co. v. Adam, 781 F.2d 526 (6th Cir.1985); Freeman United Coal Mining Co. v. … Our sister circuits have rejected the position that Board orders remanding a case to an AU for a damages determination are appealable under Cohen. See National Steel & Shipbuilding Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lamb v. Patterson

    154 F.2d 319 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 25, 1946

    Davis v. Woodring, 72 App.D.C. 83 , 111 F.2d 523 . Arizona Grocery Co., v. Atchison T. & S. F. R. Co., 284 U.S. 370, 386 , 52 S.Ct. 183 , 76 L.Ed. 348 . Miguel v. … In Galliher v.

    Reversed by Patterson v. Lamb, 329 U.S. 539 (1947)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Gilvin, Ron v. Fire, Edward

    259 F.3d 749 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 21, 2001

    (quoting United Steelworkers v. Sadlowski, 457 U.S. 102, 112 (1982))). 12 See Petramale v. … See Carothers v. Presser, 818 F.2d 926, 931 (D.C.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • United States v. Balderas

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 15, 2024

    See id. § 3142(e)(3)(A); ECF No. 174 (operative indictment); United States v. Brown, 538 F. Supp. 3d 154, 165 (D.D.C. 2021) (RCL). … See Brown, 538 F. Supp. 3d at 168–69. Given the evidence to date, this factor weighs in favor of detention. See United States v. Brockhoff, 590 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carolyn Weaver v. United States Information Agency

    87 F.3d 1429 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 9, 1996

    Brown, 444 U.S. at 354, 355 , 100 S.Ct. at 599, 600 ; see also United States v. … Similarly, in Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States ex rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.

    37 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 6, 2014

    GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In this qui tarn case, Plaintiff-Relator Harry Barko moves for an order compelling Defendants Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., KBR Technical Services, Inc., Kellogg, Brown & Root Engineering … Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383, 389 , 101 S.Ct. 677 , 66 L.Ed.2d 584 (1981). . Id. . United States v. ISS Marine Servs., Inc., 905 F.Supp.2d 121, 127 (D.D.C.2012) (quoting United States v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brian A. Brown v. Lorton Maximum Security Facility

    948 F.2d 781 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 16, 1991

    BROWN, Appellant, v. LORTON MAXIMUM SECURITY FACILITY, et al. No. 89-5403. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Sept. 16, 1991. Before RUTH BADER GINSBURG, D.H. … See Brookens v. White, 795 F.2d 178, 179 (D.C.Cir.1986). 4 The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • American Foreign Service Association v. James A. Baker, Iii, Secretary of State

    895 F.2d 1460 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 16, 1990

    See Karahalios v. … See National Federation of Federal Employees v. Weinberger, 818 F.2d 935 , 941 n. 7 (D.C.Cir.1987); Randolph-Sheppard Vendors of Am. v. Weinberger, 795 F.2d 90, 105-07 (D.C.Cir.1986).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Mnyandu El v. Ramaphosa

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2020

    Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). … Lee v. United States Agency for Int'l Dev., 859 F.3d 74, 77 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (quoting Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 316 (1979); Cort v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ocania Chalk v. Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of Labor

    565 F.2d 764 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 27, 1977

    MERITS In Hackley v. … Board was in this category.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Capitol Hill Hospital v. Jones

    532 A.2d 89 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1987

    See, e.g., Dickerson v. Pritchard, 706 F.2d 256, 259 (8th Cir.1983); Belton v. … See, e.g., Davis v. Abbuhl, supra; Phillips v. District of Columbia, supra. 15 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Foster v. Mabus

    895 F. Supp. 2d 135 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2012

    On July 21, 2011, the plaintiff sent a letter to Department of the Navy in an attempt to appeal the NJROTC Instructor Certification Board’s decision, raising three grounds to set aside the Board’s decision: (1) the Board … (citing Baker v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • IN RE: Z.B.

    131 A.3d 351 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 2016

    United States v. … Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1020 (D.C. 1991). “[W]e will not disturb the trial judge’s findings of fact unless they lack evidentiary support in the record . . . .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures v. United States

    371 F. Supp. 1291 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 1974

    Co. v. Wichita Board of Trade, supra. … Co. v. Wichita Board of Trade, 412 U.S. 800 , 93 S.Ct. 2367 , 37 L.Ed.2d 350 (1973), the Court reviewed a Commission order that particular rates were just and reasonable.

    Reversed on other grounds by Aberdeen & Rockfish R. Co. v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP), 422 U.S. 289 (1975)Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Elcon Enterprises, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

    770 F. Supp. 667 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 31, 1991

    Delta Data Systems Corp. v. … Co. v. Shultz, 583 F.Supp. 184, 189 (D.D.C.1984).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hardrick v. Government of the District of Columbia

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 11, 2026

    Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 411 (1997)). Not so at all. … Board of Cnty. Comm’rs, 520 U.S. at 406.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mykonos v. Dc Government

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2026

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fulwood v. Clemmer

    206 F. Supp. 370 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 2, 1962

    Brown, a Muslim Minister of the District of Columbia, and he stated he would be willing to teach in Lorton Reformatory the beliefs of the Muslims. … Justice Murphy in Chaplinsky v.

    Cited 49 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.