Opinion

Brian A. Brown v. Lorton Maximum Security Facility

  • 948 F.2d 781
  • 1991 WL 207101
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Sep 16, 1991
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 18.7%

The opinion

948 F.2d 781

292 U.S.App.D.C. 189

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.

Brian A. BROWN, Appellant,

v.

LORTON MAXIMUM SECURITY FACILITY, et al.

No. 89-5403.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Sept. 16, 1991.

Before RUTH BADER GINSBURG, D.H. GINSBURG and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

1

Upon consideration of the order to show cause filed April 24, 1991, and the lack of any response thereto, it is

2

ORDERED that the show cause order be discharged. It is

3

FURTHER ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed. Claims in this civil action remain pending before the district court, and that court has not entered final judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). Therefore, the district court's order filed August 18, 1989, "[does] not terminate the action as to any of the claims or parties," Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), and hence is not reviewable on appeal at this juncture. See Brookens v. White, 795 F.2d 178, 179 (D.C.Cir.1986).

4

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.