Case law

Marin Tv Services Partners, Ltd. v. Federal Communications Commission, North Bay Television, Inc., Intervenor

936 F.2d 1304 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 25, 1991

In any event, we must read the Commission’s final decision to mean what it says, see SEC v. … See Greater Boston Television Corp. v. FCC.

Ohio Valley Rock Asphalt Co. v. Helvering

95 F.2d 87 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 27, 1937

Helvering v. Taylor, 293 U.S. 507 , 55 S.Ct. 287 , 79 L.Ed. 623 . … And if it be said that the estimates would be only rough approximations it may be replied, as the Supreme Court said in United States v.

United States ex rel. Athanasopoulos v. Reid

110 F. Supp. 200 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 13, 1953

Bartsch v. Watkins, 2 Cir., 1949, 175 F.2d 245 ; United States ex rel. Castro-Louzan v. Zimmerman, D.C.Pa.1950, 94 F.Supp. 22 . … Trinler v. Carusi, 3 Cir., 1948, 166 F.2d 457 , vacated on other grounds, 3 Cir., 1948, 168 F.2d 1014 ; De Koning v. Zimmerman, D.C.Pa.1950, 89 F.Supp. 891 . Cf. United States ex rel. Zdunic v.

Colvin v. Syrian Arab Republic

363 F. Supp. 3d 141 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 1, 2019

Mem. at 4; Brown Rpt. ¶¶ 44-45. … Brown Rpt. ¶¶ 173-77.

Arch Coal, Inc. v. R. Alexander Acosta

888 F.3d 493 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 27, 2018

See, e.g., Elgin v. Dep’t of Treasury, 567 U.S. 1, 10 (2012); Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich, 510 U.S. 200, 207–09 (1994); Jarkesy v. SEC, 803 F.3d 9, 16–17 (D.C. Cir. 2015). … James V. Hurson Assocs., Inc. v. Glickman, 229 F.3d 277, 280 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (quoting JEM Broad. Co. v. FCC, 22 F.3d 320, 326 (D.C.

Donald K. Belsinger v. District of Columbia

436 F.2d 214 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 29, 1970

The point was conceded by the Electrical Board at oral argument. . This ease is thus to be distinguished from Am-Chi Restaurant, Inc. v. … In Mantzoros v.

Commonwealth Commercial State Bank v. Lucas

41 F.2d 111 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 5, 1930

Appeal from a decision by the Board of Tax Appeals involving income taxes for the *112 calendar year 1921 in the amount of $3,358.08. … In January, 1928, the Board of Tax Appeals, in the case of First National Bank of St. Paul v. Commissioner, 10 B. T.

Lamb v. Patterson

154 F.2d 319 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 25, 1946

Davis v. Woodring, 72 App.D.C. 83 , 111 F.2d 523 . Arizona Grocery Co., v. Atchison T. & S. F. R. Co., 284 U.S. 370, 386 , 52 S.Ct. 183 , 76 L.Ed. 348 . Miguel v. … In Galliher v.

District of Columbia v. Gandy

450 A.2d 896 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 22, 1982

Officer Gaydovchik testified that the lookout was for “a Negro male in a brown suit or tan suit, ... running through the alley in the rear of the 1700 block of I Street, N.W.” … Officer George McCann testified that the lookout described the suspected robber as “a Negro male in his twenties, approximately five-eight to five-nine, wearing a brown jacket and brown pants.

United States v. Balderas

District Court, District of Columbia · May 15, 2024

See id. § 3142(e)(3)(A); ECF No. 174 (operative indictment); United States v. Brown, 538 F. Supp. 3d 154, 165 (D.D.C. 2021) (RCL). … See Brown, 538 F. Supp. 3d at 168–69. Given the evidence to date, this factor weighs in favor of detention. See United States v. Brockhoff, 590 F.

Smoot Sand & Gravel Corp. v. Britton

152 F.2d 17 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 26, 1945

In the absence of an express prohibition by the employer against riding on the running board, the circumstances could reasonably imply consent. 7 In Smith v. … of risk which was involved in Monahan v.

Loumiet v. Office of the Comptroller of Currency

650 F.3d 796 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 12, 2011

Denson, Attorney.  2 Before: HENDERSON, BROWN and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … See Taucher v. Brown-Hruska, 396 F.3d 1168, 1173 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (requiring “a reasonable basis both in law and fact” to satisfy the EAJA’s substantial justification  11 standard).

Brian A. Brown v. Lorton Maximum Security Facility

948 F.2d 781 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 16, 1991

BROWN, Appellant, v. LORTON MAXIMUM SECURITY FACILITY, et al. No. 89-5403. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Sept. 16, 1991. Before RUTH BADER GINSBURG, D.H. … See Brookens v. White, 795 F.2d 178, 179 (D.C.Cir.1986). 4 The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.

American Foreign Service Association v. James A. Baker, Iii, Secretary of State

895 F.2d 1460 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 16, 1990

See Karahalios v. … See National Federation of Federal Employees v. Weinberger, 818 F.2d 935 , 941 n. 7 (D.C.Cir.1987); Randolph-Sheppard Vendors of Am. v. Weinberger, 795 F.2d 90, 105-07 (D.C.Cir.1986).

Walters v. Secretary of Defense

533 F. Supp. 1068 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 1982

In United States v. … In United States v.

Powell v. Davis

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 30, 2018

Public Employee Relations Board (“PERB”). Id. at 186-87. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

IN RE: Z.B.

131 A.3d 351 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 2016

United States v. … Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1020 (D.C. 1991). “[W]e will not disturb the trial judge’s findings of fact unless they lack evidentiary support in the record . . . .

Fox v. Johnson & Wimsatt

31 F. Supp. 64 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 24, 1940

The condemnation proceeding was discontinued and abandoned by the District of Columbia December 10th, 1931, and their right to so discontinue and abandon was upheld by the Court of Appeals in Johnson & Wimsatt, Inc. v. … That this report was adopted by the board of directors.

Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures v. United States

371 F. Supp. 1291 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 1974

Co. v. Wichita Board of Trade, supra. … Co. v. Wichita Board of Trade, 412 U.S. 800 , 93 S.Ct. 2367 , 37 L.Ed.2d 350 (1973), the Court reviewed a Commission order that particular rates were just and reasonable.

Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon v. Jewell

830 F.3d 754 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 29, 2016

Appellants believe four things in particular prove their point: 1) a 1976 Department decision regarding the Stillaguamish Tribe; 2) a 1980 decision in Brown v. … The Brown v. Commissioner of Indian Affairs decision is of no greater help to Appellants. 8 IBIA 183 (1980).