Case law

Juffer v. Caldera

138 F. Supp. 2d 22 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 2001

consideration by a special selection board; or (2) to grant any relief on such a claim unless the officer or former officer has been selected for promotion by a special selection board convened under this section to consider … Coit Independence Joint Venture v. FSLIC, 489 U.S. 561, 587 , 109 S.Ct. 1361 , 103 L.Ed.2d 602 (1989). B.

Powell v. Davis

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 30, 2018

Public Employee Relations Board (“PERB”). Id. at 186-87. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

United Transportation Union v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Norfolk and Western Railway Company, Intervenor

43 F.3d 697 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 10, 1995

Workers v. ICC, 862 F.2d 330 , 335-38 (D.C.Cir.1988) (IBEW); Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees v. ICC, 920 F.2d 40, 44-45 (D.C.Cir.1990); Railway Labor Executives’ Ass’n v. … The Agreement does not incorporate RLA standards or provide for creation of an RLA Public Law Board to resolve labor disputes. In United Transp. Union v. Norfolk & W. Ry.

Fox v. Johnson & Wimsatt

31 F. Supp. 64 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 24, 1940

The condemnation proceeding was discontinued and abandoned by the District of Columbia December 10th, 1931, and their right to so discontinue and abandon was upheld by the Court of Appeals in Johnson & Wimsatt, Inc. v. … That this report was adopted by the board of directors.

Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon v. Jewell

830 F.3d 754 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 29, 2016

Appellants believe four things in particular prove their point: 1) a 1976 Department decision regarding the Stillaguamish Tribe; 2) a 1980 decision in Brown v. … The Brown v. Commissioner of Indian Affairs decision is of no greater help to Appellants. 8 IBIA 183 (1980).

United States v. Balderas

District Court, District of Columbia · May 15, 2024

See id. § 3142(e)(3)(A); ECF No. 174 (operative indictment); United States v. Brown, 538 F. Supp. 3d 154, 165 (D.D.C. 2021) (RCL). … See Brown, 538 F. Supp. 3d at 168–69. Given the evidence to date, this factor weighs in favor of detention. See United States v. Brockhoff, 590 F.

City of Abilene v. Federal Communications Commission

164 F.3d 49 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 5, 1999

See Sailors v. Board of Educ., 387 U.S. 105, 107-08 (1967); see also Wisconsin Pub. Intervenor v. Morti- er, 501 U.S. 597, 607-08 (1991). … Communi- cations Comm. v. FCC, 131 F.3d 1066 (D.C. Cir. 1997).

In re Haupt

801 A.2d 27 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 2002

See Montgomery County Bar Ass’n, Inc. v. Haupt, 277 Md. 326 , 353 A.2d 629 (1976) (per curiam) (Haupt I); Atty Grievance Comm’n of Md. v. … The Board denied petitioner’s first petition for failure of proof.

National Railroad Passenger v. Veolia Transportation Services, Inc.

592 F. Supp. 2d 86 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 8, 2009

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Walters v. Blankenship, 931 So.2d 137, 139 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2006); Smith v. … Brown, 395 A.2d 79, 84 (D.C.1978), that is “commercially reasonable to anticipate,” Whelan v. Abell, 953 F.2d 663, 673 (D.C.Cir.1992) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

Brian A. Brown v. Lorton Maximum Security Facility

948 F.2d 781 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 16, 1991

BROWN, Appellant, v. LORTON MAXIMUM SECURITY FACILITY, et al. No. 89-5403. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Sept. 16, 1991. Before RUTH BADER GINSBURG, D.H. … See Brookens v. White, 795 F.2d 178, 179 (D.C.Cir.1986). 4 The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.

Ewell v. United States

72 A.3d 127 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 2013

Latham”; 8 and (2) as required by the standard set forth in Brown v. … See Douglas v.

MacKay v. Quigg

641 F. Supp. 567 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 7, 1986

Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip Corp., 713 F.2d 1530, 1538 (Fed.Cir.1983). See Simmons Fastener Corp. v. … Fregeau v.

Toumazou v. Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus

71 F. Supp. 3d 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 9, 2014

Daimler AG v. Bauman, 134 S. Ct. 746, 761 (2014); see also Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, SA v. Brown, 131 S. Ct. 2846 (2011). … Daimler AG v. Bauman, 134 S. Ct. at 758 n.11 (emphasis added) (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, SA v. Brown, 131 S. Ct. at 2851) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Royal v. D.C. Metropolitan Police Dep't & D.C. Office of Employee Appeals

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 2, 2024

v. … Works v.

Lemus v. Grover Montano Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2026

Whiting v. AARP, 701 F. Supp. 2d 21, 29 (D.D.C. 2010) (quoting Pearson v. Chung, 961 A.2d 1067, 1075 (D.C. 2008)); see also Krukas v. AARP, Inc., 376 F. … See Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1024 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (“To prevail on a claim of breach of contract, a party must establish ... damages caused by breach.”) (cleaned up). The Court disagrees.

Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Local Union No. 6-418, Afl-Cio Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Local Union No. 6-75, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., Intervenor. International Chemical Workers Union, Local No. 733, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Borden Chemical, a Division of Borden, Inc., Intervenor. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, Kansas City, Local No. 5- 114, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Colgate Palmolive Company, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Local Union No. 6-418, Afl-Cio, Intervenors. Borden Chemical, a Division of Borden, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, International Chemical Workers Union, Local No. 733, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. Colgate-Palmolive Company v. National Labor Relations Board, and Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, Kansas City, Kansas Local No. 5-114, Afl-Cio, Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, Kansas City, Local 5-114, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

694 F.2d 1289 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 17, 1982

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Colgate Palmolive Company, Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … See NLRB v.

Gilvin, Ron v. Fire, Edward

259 F.3d 749 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 21, 2001

(quoting United Steelworkers v. Sadlowski, 457 U.S. 102, 112 (1982))). 12 See Petramale v. … See Carothers v. Presser, 818 F.2d 926, 931 (D.C.

Capitol Hill Hospital v. Jones

532 A.2d 89 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1987

See, e.g., Dickerson v. Pritchard, 706 F.2d 256, 259 (8th Cir.1983); Belton v. … See, e.g., Davis v. Abbuhl, supra; Phillips v. District of Columbia, supra. 15 .

Keh Tong Chen v. Attorney General of the United States

546 F. Supp. 1060 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 25, 1982

In Prapavat v. … Acosta v.

Elcon Enterprises, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

770 F. Supp. 667 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 31, 1991

Delta Data Systems Corp. v. … Co. v. Shultz, 583 F.Supp. 184, 189 (D.D.C.1984).