Case law

Ocania Chalk v. Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of Labor

565 F.2d 764 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 27, 1977

MERITS In Hackley v. … Board was in this category.

In re T.C.

999 A.2d 72 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 2010

The Witness: And brown skin[ned]. The Court: He’s light skinned and brown skinned? The Witness: No, he’s brown skinned. The Court: You just said he was light skinned. The Witness: I meant to say he was brown skinned. … Perry v.

Phillips v. a & C ADJUSTERS, INC.

213 A.2d 586 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1965

To paraphase the words of the late Judge Clagett in Creighton v. … Brown, D.C.Mun.App., 77 A.2d 559, 561 (1950), we think it an anchronism that the statutory limitation is here multiplied fourfold simply because appellant signed her name on a line in which the word seal had already been

United States v. Philip Morris USA

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2022

_______________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Reynolds Tobacco Company (individually, as successor in interest to Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, and as successor to Lorillard Tobacco Company) (collectively, “defendants”); and ITG Brands, LLC, Commonwealth Brands

Idrogo v. Foxx

990 F. Supp. 2d 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 25, 2013

S(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff is a Texas resident. He purports to sue U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx, certain members of Congress, and other individuals. See Compl.

Noha v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 11, 2025

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).  The Court dismisses the complaint for the simple reasons that there are no factual allegations.

Sorrell v. Paige Industrial Services, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · May 27, 2021

White v. Vilsack, 888 F. Supp. 2d 93, 98 (D.D.C. 2012) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999)). … and it chose to settle with him,” Brown Tr. at 43:16–18.

American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

785 F.2d 333 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 11, 1986

Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board, 313 U.S. 177, 194 , 61 S.Ct. 845, 852 , 85 L.Ed. 1271 (1941). … "In fashioning remedies to undo the effects of violations of the Act, the Board must draw on enlightenment gained from experience.” Labor Board v.

McKeeman v. Bush

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 2026

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).  The Court dismisses the complaint for the simple reason that there are no factual allegations supporting an actual legal claim. see Compl. at 4.

United States v. Jose B. Salamanca, United States of America v. Hector A. Salamanca

990 F.2d 629 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 16, 1993

United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 923 , 104 S.Ct. 3405, 3421 , 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984) (citing Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 610-11 , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2265 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975) (Powell, J., concurring in part)). … See Bailey v.

Loumiet v. Office of the Comptroller of Currency

650 F.3d 796 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 12, 2011

Denson, Attorney.  2 Before: HENDERSON, BROWN and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … See Taucher v. Brown-Hruska, 396 F.3d 1168, 1173 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (requiring “a reasonable basis both in law and fact” to satisfy the EAJA’s substantial justification  11 standard).

Evangelical Community Hospital v. Becerra

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2022

Overton Park, Inc., v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 413–14 (1971), abrogated on other grounds by Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99 (1977). … See, e.g., id. at 83–84 (upholding the Board’s authority to dismiss issues that were not presented in accordance with the Board’s procedural rules); Inova Alexandria Hosp. v.

Strunk v. United States Department of Commerce Bureau of the Census

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 2010

Brown, and his opposition to Defendant City of New York and Michael Bloomberg's Motion to Dismiss [#25]. … Brown, S.J., under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985(3), and 1986.

Strong-Fisher v. LaHood

611 F. Supp. 2d 49 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 30, 2009

In Brown v. … .”); Prince v. Rice, 453 F.Supp.2d 14, 25 (D.D.C.2006) (noting that the court of appeals has interpreted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Brown v.

Fox v. Johnson & Wimsatt

31 F. Supp. 64 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 24, 1940

The condemnation proceeding was discontinued and abandoned by the District of Columbia December 10th, 1931, and their right to so discontinue and abandon was upheld by the Court of Appeals in Johnson & Wimsatt, Inc. v. … That this report was adopted by the board of directors.

Mitchell v. Yellen

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 24, 2018

must identify some “legitimate, non-discriminatory or non-retaliatory reason” for the employment action, see id. at 1092, which the plaintiff can rebut by showing that the employer’s stated reason is “merely pretext,” Brown … v.

Star Lake Railroad v. Lujan

737 F. Supp. 103 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 1990

BACKGROUND AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW Plaintiff Star Lake Railroad (Star Lake) is appealing a final decision by the Interior Department’s Interior Board of Indian Appeals (IBIA or Board) affirming the Navajo Area Board of Indian … The Board's decision does not discuss it. If indeed the claim was not presented to the agency in the first instance, it cannot be pressed on this Court. Washington Association for Television & Children v.

District of Columbia v. United Leasing Associates of America, Ltd.

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 11, 2009

(quoting Dixon v. Coburg Dairy, Inc., 369 F.3d 811, 815-16 (4th Cir. 2003) (en banc)); Johnson-Brown v. 2200 M St. LLC, 257 F. … Superior Court, Brown v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 26 F. Supp. 2d 74, 77 (D.D.C. 1998), for the reasons stated in plaintiff’s reply brief. Pl.’s Reply Br. at 13-16; see also Brown, 26 F.

Park Dean Kauffman Gaila M. Kauffman v. Anglo-American School of Sofia, an Unincorporated Association

28 F.3d 1223 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 12, 1994

Our disposition is controlled by FDIC v. … We requested supplemental briefing on whether a Bivens action may be brought against an entity like the School or only against the individual board members. Cf. United States Nat’l Bank of Oregon v. Independent Ins.

Juliano v. Federal Asset Disposition Ass'n (FADA)

736 F. Supp. 348 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 4, 1990

For example, in United States v. … See also United States v.