Case law

Lipsman v. Secretary of the Army

335 F. Supp. 2d 48 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 7, 2004

See, e.g., Aiken v. … Walker v. Shannon, 848 F.Supp. 250, 254-55 (D.D.C.1994) (holding that it is not the function of the court to serve as a “super correction board”).

Waggaman v. Helvering

78 F.2d 721 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 13, 1935

Bank v. Burnet, 61 App. D. … The plea of limitations was therefore rightly denied by the Board. In Wausau Sulphate Fibre Co. v. Commissioner (C. C.

Ocania Chalk v. Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of Labor

565 F.2d 764 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 27, 1977

MERITS In Hackley v. … Board was in this category.

Resolute Forest Products, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture

187 F. Supp. 3d 100 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 17, 2016

Ctr. v. Leavitt, 415 F.3d 24, 29-30 (D.C. Cir. 2005); see also FEC v. … See Spector Motor Serv. v.

In re T.C.

999 A.2d 72 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 2010

The Witness: And brown skin[ned]. The Court: He’s light skinned and brown skinned? The Witness: No, he’s brown skinned. The Court: You just said he was light skinned. The Witness: I meant to say he was brown skinned. … Perry v.

Phillips v. a & C ADJUSTERS, INC.

213 A.2d 586 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1965

To paraphase the words of the late Judge Clagett in Creighton v. … Brown, D.C.Mun.App., 77 A.2d 559, 561 (1950), we think it an anchronism that the statutory limitation is here multiplied fourfold simply because appellant signed her name on a line in which the word seal had already been

Commissariat a L'EnErgiE Atomique v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents

274 F.2d 594 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 21, 1960

See Grady v. Watson, 1958, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 286 , 261 F.2d 752 ; Eckey v. Watson, 1959, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 16 , 268 F.2d 891 . … Greensboro-High Point Airport Authority v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 1956, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 358 , 231 F.2d 517 .

United States v. Philip Morris USA

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2022

_______________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Reynolds Tobacco Company (individually, as successor in interest to Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, and as successor to Lorillard Tobacco Company) (collectively, “defendants”); and ITG Brands, LLC, Commonwealth Brands

Fulwood v. Clemmer

206 F. Supp. 370 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 2, 1962

Brown, a Muslim Minister of the District of Columbia, and he stated he would be willing to teach in Lorton Reformatory the beliefs of the Muslims. … Justice Murphy in Chaplinsky v.

Association of American Medical Colleges v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary, Department of Health, Education and Welfare

569 F.2d 101 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 1, 1977

of services is notified of the Board’s decision, reverses, affirms, or modifies the Board’s decision. … Adams Nursing Hosp., Inc. v. Mathews, 548 F.2d 1077, 1079 (1st Cir. 1977) (dispute arising prior to creation of the Board for review of such actions); Hazelwood Chronic & Convalescent Home, Inc. v.

United States v. Derrek Arrington

4 F.4th 162 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 13, 2021

Mirzayance, 556 U.S. 111 (2009); Schriro v. Landrigan, 550 U.S. 465 (2007); Uttecht v. Brown, 551 U.S. 1 (2007); Schriro v. Landrigan, 550 U.S. 465 (2007); Carey v. Musladin, 549 U.S. 70 (2006); Brown v. … .”); see also Brown v. United States, 139 S.

Noha v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 11, 2025

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).  The Court dismisses the complaint for the simple reasons that there are no factual allegations.

Sorrell v. Paige Industrial Services, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · May 27, 2021

White v. Vilsack, 888 F. Supp. 2d 93, 98 (D.D.C. 2012) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999)). … and it chose to settle with him,” Brown Tr. at 43:16–18.

American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

785 F.2d 333 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 11, 1986

Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board, 313 U.S. 177, 194 , 61 S.Ct. 845, 852 , 85 L.Ed. 1271 (1941). … "In fashioning remedies to undo the effects of violations of the Act, the Board must draw on enlightenment gained from experience.” Labor Board v.

McKeeman v. Bush

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 2026

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).  The Court dismisses the complaint for the simple reason that there are no factual allegations supporting an actual legal claim. see Compl. at 4.

American Federation of Government Employees v. Office of Personnel Management

821 F.2d 761 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 1987

Appellants rely for this argument on Cleveland Board of Education v. … Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 308 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1720 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979).

United States v. Jose B. Salamanca, United States of America v. Hector A. Salamanca

990 F.2d 629 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 16, 1993

United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 923 , 104 S.Ct. 3405, 3421 , 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984) (citing Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 610-11 , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2265 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975) (Powell, J., concurring in part)). … See Bailey v.

United States v. Mahoney

698 F. Supp. 344 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 5, 1988

The defendant relies on Brown v. United States, 245 F.2d 549 (8th Cir.1957). … Similar claims of lack of grand jury jurisdiction based on Brown v. United States, 245 F.2d 549 (8th Cir.1957), have been rejected by this Court when presented in circumstances similar to the present case.

Evangelical Community Hospital v. Becerra

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2022

Overton Park, Inc., v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 413–14 (1971), abrogated on other grounds by Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99 (1977). … See, e.g., id. at 83–84 (upholding the Board’s authority to dismiss issues that were not presented in accordance with the Board’s procedural rules); Inova Alexandria Hosp. v.

Maneely v. Donley

967 F. Supp. 2d 393 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2013

Kreis v. Sec'y of Air Force, 866 F.2d 1508, 1514 (D.C. Cir. 1989); see also Cone v. Caldera, 223 F.3d 789, 793 (D.C. Cir. 2000); 9 Kight v. United States, 850 F. … Frizelle v. Slater, 111 F.3d 172, 176 (D.C. Cir. 1997). The district court is not to function as a “super correction board.” Charette v. Walker, 996 F. Supp. 43, 50 (D.D.C. 1998).