Case law

Wolff v. Westwood Management, LLC

558 F.3d 517 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 2009

Before: ROGERS, BROWN and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.  2 Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … BROWN, Circuit Judge: This case concerns the shelf-life of an arbitration provision in a superseded contract.

Marcus v. Department of Treasury

813 F. Supp. 2d 11 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2011

Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 825 (1976); see also Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 541-43 (D.C. Cir. 1983) (“The Title VII remedy declared exclusive for federal employees in Brown v.

William Harvey Jones v. Steve D. Johnston, Executive U.S. Board of Parole, Arthur E. Byrd, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Maurice J. Sigler, Chairman, Delbert C. Jackson, Director Department of Corrections District of Columbia

534 F.2d 353 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 1976

Hahn v. Revis, 520 F.2d 632 (7th Cir. 1975) (mandate withdrawn); Cleveland v. Ciccone, 517 F.2d 1082 (8th Cir. 1975); Reese v. United States Board of Parole, No. 74-2418, 530 F.2d 231 (9th Cir. 1976); Small v. … Board of Parole, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 248 , 345 F.2d 737 (1965) 33 Tippitt v. Wood, supra, 140 F.2d at 692 ; Mock v. U. S.

Hood v. United States

661 A.2d 1081 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1995

Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1020 (D.C.1991). … See Brown, supra, 590 A.2d at 1014 .

Granite-Groves v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

845 F.2d 330 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 22, 1988

Signal Co. v. Washington Metrop. … Arundel Corp. v. United States, 515 F.2d 1116, 1123 , 207 Ct.Cl. 84 (1975); Dale Ingram, Inc. v. United States, 475 F.2d 1177, 1184 , 201 Ct.Cl. 56 (1973); Foster Constr. C.A. & William Bros. Co. v.

Procacci v. Sigler

61 F.R.D. 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 1973

The Parole Board sitting en banc in Washington, D.C., denied his requests. The Board did not provide any reasons for the denials. The Board did state, in response to an inquiry from Mr. … The decision set to rest the contrary interpretation which emanated from Ahrens v. Clark, 335 u. S. 188, 68 S.Ct. 1443 , 92 L.Ed. 1898 (1948).

Milton S. Kronheim & Co. v. District of Columbia

877 F. Supp. 21 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 24, 1995

Quality Brands, Inc. v. Barry, Civ. No. 88-1999. … Maine v. Taylor, 477 U.S. 131, 138-39 , 106 S.Ct. 2440, 2447 , 91 L.Ed.2d 110 (1986) (emphasis added) (internal citations omitted). See also Wyoming v.

Ford v. Tait

163 F. Supp. 2d 57 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 2001

The Board appoints the Bar Counsel to act as the “disciplinary arm of the D.C. Courts.” See Anderson v. D.C. Public Defender Service, 756 F.Supp. 28, 31 (D.D.C.1991) (citing D.C. Rules Ann. … See Huffman v.

Robinson v. Dalton

45 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 16, 1998

Analysis A military service Secretary’s correction-board decisions are subject to review under § 706 of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706 . Chappell v. … Blassingame v. Sec’y of the Navy, 866 F.2d 556, 559 (2d Cir.1989) (citing Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363, 388 , 77 S.Ct. 1152 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1403 (1957) and Neal v.

Tanner v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

475 F. Supp. 2d 103 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 1, 2007

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). The complaint need only set forth a short and plain statement of the claim, giving the defendant fair notice of the claim and the grounds upon which it rests. … Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 .

Morgan v. DIST. OF COLUMBIA P. & FR & R. BD.

370 A.2d 1322 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 1977

Stoner v. *1326 Police and Firemen's Retirement and Relief Board, supra; Hyde v. Tobriner, 117 U.S. App.D.C. 311, 313, 329 F.2d 879, 881 (1964); Lynch v. Tobriner, 237 F.Supp. 313, 316 (D.D.C.1965). … See also Crider v. Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 299 A.2d 134 (1973). Cf. Stoner v. Police and Firemen's Retirement and Relief Board, supra, at 530 n. 10.

Fales v. Commission on Licensure to Practice the Healing Art

275 A.2d 238 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1971

Boynton v. Perkins, 138 Kan. 899 , 28 P.2d 765 (1934); People v. Griswold, 213 N.Y. 92 , 106 N.E. 929 (1914); and see Aitchison v. United States, D.C.Mun.App., 98 A.2d 791, 793 (1953). … People v. Griswold, supra. Therefore, the license creates no vested right which other states are bound to recognize. State v. Crombie, 107 Minn. 171 , 119 N.W. 660 (1909); see Aitchison v. United States, supra.

Wortham v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · May 1, 2014

See Wilkinson v. … DATE: May 1, 2014 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Athens Community Hospital, Inc. v. Shalala

21 F.3d 1176 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 6, 1994

See Athens Community Hospital, Inc. v. Sullivan, 815 F.Supp. 1 (D.D.C.1992). … Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 , 103 S.Ct. 2856, 2867 , 77 L.Ed.2d 443 (1983); see also MCI Telecommunications Corp. v.

Pam Squared at Texarkana, LLC v. Azar

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2020

See, e.g., Dillmon v. NTSB, 588 F.3d 1085, 1090–92 (D.C. … Id.; see also Chen v. GAO, 821 F.2d 732, 734–36 (D.C.

Hicks v. Reid

194 F.2d 327 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 3, 1952

The District of Columbia Board of Parole considered these charges a violation of the release conditions imposed by § 716(b) and issued a warrant against appellant. … Story v. Rives, 193S, 68 App.D.C. 325, 329 , 97 F.2d 182, 186 .

Mykonos v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 16, 2026

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668- 71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Here, Plaintiff’s bare and ambiguous allegations fall well short of providing sufficient notice of any claim.

Hairston v. Tapella

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 21, 2009

B), Utz’s declaration does not refute that Hairston met with Brown. Additionally, the GPO attached to its motion a right to sue letter issued by Brown. (Def.’s Mem. Ex. C.) … Taken together, the evidence could support the inference that Hairston met with Brown.

Fuller v. Fuller

190 A.2d 252 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 1963

Brown v. Brown, D.C.Mun.App., 75 A.2d 140 (1950). … In Griffin v.

Granheim v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 16, 2023

Rich v. United States, 369 F. Supp. 3d 263, 273 (D.D.C. 2019) (Hogan, J.) (quoting Sierra Club v. Mainella, 459 F. Supp. 2d 76, 90 (D.D.C. 2006) (Bates, J.)). … He points to Fail v.