Case law

Brown v. Brown

76 Ark. App. 494 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 27, 2002

Appellant, David Brown, XJ^and appellee, Janet Brown, were divorced in 1993. In 2001, Janet filed a motion for contempt and for an increase in child support. … In Tucker v. Tucker, 74 Ark.

Brown v. Brown

2021 Ohio 1932 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 2021

[Cite as Brown v. Brown, 2021-Ohio-1932.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT UNION COUNTY JASON R. … BROWN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CASE NO. 14-20-24 v. MEAGHAN J. BROWN, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

Indiana University v. Hartwell

174 Ind. App. 325 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 1977

Warren v. Indiana Telephone Co. (1940), 217 Ind. 93 , 26 N.E.2d 399 ; State ex rel. Standard Oil Co. v. Review Bd. (1951), 230 Ind. 1 , 101 N.E.2d 60 . … Standard Oil Co. v. Review Bd., supra and Schakel v. Review Bd. of Indiana Employment Sec. Division (1968), 142 Ind. *331 App. 475, 235 N.E.2d 497 .

Brown v. Brown

329 Ill. 198 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1928

(Parker v. Gray, 317 Ill. 468 ; Murdock v. Murdock, 219 id. 123; Hessick v. Hessick, 169 id. 486; Achilles v. Achilles, 151 id. 136; Taylor v. Taylor, 144 id. 436.) … (Hessick v. Hessick, supra; Mines v. Phee, 254 Ill. 60 ; Murdock v. Murdock, supra.)

Brown v. Brown

106 Fla. 423 · Supreme Court of Florida · Aug 9, 1932

Brown left surviving her four children: Doctor Brown, Mrs. Worthington, Mrs. J. B. Roberts and R. L. Brown. In January, 1925, R. L. Brown, Jessie L. Roberts and Mrs. … Fox v. Kimball, 92 Fla. 401 , 109 South. Rep. 465 ; McGill vs. Chappelle, 71 Fla. 479 , 71 South. Rep. 836 ; Semple v. Semple, 90 Fla. 7 , 105 South. Rep. 134 ; Johnson v. Sherehouse, 61 Fla. 647 , 54 South. Rep. 892 .

Brown v. Brown

2013 Ohio 3456 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 2013

[Cite as Brown v. Brown, 2013-Ohio-3456.] … [Cite as Brown v. Brown, 2013-Ohio-3456.] I. The Relocation Restriction {¶ 2} The parties, Holli and Troy Brown, are the mother and father of three minor children.

Brown v. Brown

79 So. 3d 190 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 9, 2012

See Holden Cove, Inc. v. 4 Mac Holdings, Inc., 948 So.2d 1041, 1042 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (rejecting an irreparable harm argument as being premature and speculative). … See Jackson v. Computer Sci. Raytheon, 36 So.3d 754, 756 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“Certiorari jurisdiction does not arise unless the court first establishes irreparable harm.”).

Brown v. Brown

379 S.C. 271 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · May 28, 2008

See Pool v. … Brown v. Brown, Op. No.2008-UP-051 (S.C. Ct.App. filed Jan. 14, 2008) (unpublished opinion). 2 . We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Brown v. Brown

4 Conn. 269 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jun 15, 1822

Whether he make payment to the plaintiffs, or to the keeper of a boarding-house, for his support, is of no importance to him, if he is not obliged to incur unreasonable expense. … In Backus v. Dudley, 3 Conn. Rep. 568 . this court decided, that a town was not obliged to support their poor abroad, who refused to be supported at home. The case of Wilder v. Whittemore, 15 Mass.

Brown v. Brown

158 So. 2d 305 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 14, 1964

158 So.2d 305 (1963) Tom BROWN et al. v. Richard E. BROWN, Jr., Administrator, Division of Employment Security, Department of Labor, State of Louisiana. No. 5947. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. … See Adams v. Review Board (1951), 121 Ind.App. 273 , 98 N.E.2d 681 , Bartlett v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act (Connecticut, 1955), 142 Conn. 497 , 115 A.2d 671 , Cameron v.

Brown v. Brown

33 L.R.A. 816 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Dec 2, 1895

Brown v. Brown

180 So. 2d 106 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 1965

180 So.2d 106 (1965) Barbara Anderson BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald T. BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10448. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. October 28, 1965. Rehearing Denied November 30, 1965. … Estopinal v. Estopinal, 223 La. 485 , 66 So.2d 311 (1953) and McCaa v. McCaa (La.App., 2 Cir., 1964) 163 So.2d 434 , writ refused 246 La. 579 , 165 So.2d 480 . Mrs.

United States v. Grote

629 F. Supp. 2d 1201 · District Court, E.D. Washington · Jun 16, 2009

He inspected the contents of the brown paper bag and found that it contained a full, unopened bottle of vodka. … United States v. Ortiz, 714 F.Supp. 1569, 1577-80 (C.D.Cal.1989), affirmed without opinion sub nom. in United States v. Valenzuela, 899 F.2d 19 (9th Cir.1990); United States v.

Brown v. Brown

91 Ky. 639 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky · Feb 21, 1889

Brown, on the 9th day of February, 1878, conveyed to his brother, the appellant, W. S. Brown, all his property, consisting of real estate lying in Marion county, Ky. The-conveyance was by deed, which was duly recorded. … (Yankey v. Sweeney, &c., 85 Ky., 55 .)

BIO-TEC ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC v. Adams

792 F. Supp. 2d 1208 · District Court, D. New Mexico · May 31, 2011

BROWNING, District Judge. … Thompson v. THI of N.M. at Casa Arena, No. CIV 05-1331 JB/LCS, 2008 WL 5999653 , at *14-15 (D.N.M. Dec. 24, 2008) (Browning, J.)

Brown v. Brown

53 Wis. 29 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1881

Kane v. Larrabee, 3 Pin., 166 ; Hansen v. Fish, 27 Wis., 535 ; Servatius v. Pickel, 30 Wis., 507 . … In Hansen v. Fish it is said in the opinion that the court may, upon its own motion, set aside a judgment inadvertently ordered, at any time during the term at which it was entered.

Brown v. Brown

54 A.D.2d 553 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 20, 1976

award of temporary alimony is a speedy trial where the true facts as to finances and standards of living of the parties can be ascertained, and where the defendant’s right to alimony can be finally determined (see Tobias v

Brown v. Brown

16 Barb. 569 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1852

.- (Platt v. Arthur, 10 Barb. 9 . Beck v. McGillis, 9 Id. 35 . Rose v. Rose, 7 Id. 174.) The case of Walton v. Walton, (7 John Ch. … (Ellison v. Miller. 11 Barb. 332 . Arthur v. Arthur, 10 Id. 9. Pond v. Bergh, 10 Paige 140,149 .)

Klug v. BRIDGEWATER TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD

407 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 1, 2009

v. … We emphasize that a planning board is not required to accept the testimony of any expert. El Shaer v.

Brown v. Brown

147 A.D.3d 896 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 2017

Hartog, 85 NY2d at 48 ; Price v Price, 69 NY2d at 18-19 ; Dinoto v Dinoto, 97 AD3d 529, 530 [2012]; Alper v Alper, 77 AD3d 694, 695 [2010]; Embury v Embury, 49 AD3d 802, 804 [2008]; Scharfman v Scharfman, 19 AD3d 474 [2005 … Therefore, the plaintiff was entitled to a share of that appreciation (see Hartog v Hartog, 85 NY2d 36 [1995]; Price v Price, 69 NY2d at 18-19 ; Hymowitz v Hymowitz, 119 AD3d 736, 739 [2014]; Imhof v Imhof, 259 AD2d at 667