Case law

Washington v. Specialized Loan Servicing

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 22, 2024

See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Under Rule 9(b), a party alleging fraud “must state with particularity the circumstances constituting [the] fraud.” FED. R. CIV. P. 9(b). … While the Court must construe a pro se complaint together with all the plaintiff’s filings, see Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C.

In Re: Grand Jury

475 F.3d 1299 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 9, 2007

United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974) (quoting, inter alia, Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 688 (1972); United States v. Bryan, 339 U.S. 323, 331 (1941)). … United States v.

Parker v. District of Columbia

588 F. Supp. 518 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 1983

See Bennett v. District *521 of Columbia Board of Education, No. 82-0224 (D DC April 22, 1983). … Keith v. Washington, 401 A.2d 468, 471 (D.C.App.1979). See also Roberson v. District of Columbia Board of Higher Education, 359 A.2d 28, 31, n. 4 (D.C.App.1976); Farrell v. Ward, 53 A.2d 46, 50 (D.C.Mun.App.1947); D.C.

Orange Belt District Council of Painters No. 48, Afl-Cio, Its Affiliated Local Unions and Its Agents v. National Labor Relations Board

361 F.2d 70 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 13, 1966

PER CURIAM: The Union petitioner requests the court to set aside, and the Board by cross-petition requests the court to enforce, a Board Order based on findings that the Union had violated the “secondary boycott provisions … We have considered the Union’s Contentions, largely based on its view of Local 761, etc., Electrical Workers v.

Riley v. United States

923 A.2d 868 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 3, 2007

Brown then called his friend Robin Milbourne to ask for a ride. When Milbourne arrived, Brown went with her to get gasoline. … See Moran v.

John F. English v. John Cunningham

269 F.2d 517 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 15, 1959

Co. v. System Federation No. 40, 300 U.S. 515, 552 , 57 S.Ct. 592 , 81 L.Ed. 789 ; and see Green v. … Ne%v Convention.

United States v. Guillen

561 F.3d 527 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 14, 2009

Brown, 232 F.3d 399, 403 (4th Cir. 2000); United States v. Melancon, 972 F.2d 566, 567 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v. Fleming, 239 F.3d 761, 763-64, (6th Cir. 2001); United States v. … See, e.g., United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315, 1327 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam); Teeter, 257 F.3d at 25 n.9-n.10; United States v. Brown, 232 F.3d 399, 403 (4th Cir. 2000); United States v.

FW Berens Sales Co., Inc. v. McKinney

310 A.2d 601 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1973

Co., 186 F.2d 473, 481 (4th Cir. 1951); Where a school board failed to admit the plaintiffs as pupils solely because they were unwed mothers after a court had already held in another case in which the very same school board … See Shull v. Columbia Municipal Separate School District, supra, 338 F.Supp. at 1378 (“[T]he [school] board acted directly contrary to Judge Keady’s holding in Smith.

Colm v. Kissinger

406 F. Supp. 1250 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 17, 1975

Plaintiffs cite for this proposition Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 603 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); Slochower v. Board of Higher Education, 350 U.S. 551 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 (1956); Wieman v. … See Bailey v. Richardson, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 248 , 182 F.2d 46 (1950), aff’d by an equally divided Court, 341 U.S. 918 , 71 S.Ct. 669 , 95 L.Ed. 1352 (1951). 23 . See Board of Regents v.

Wilson v. Fullwood

772 F. Supp. 2d 246 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2011

Parole Board that operated with nearly complete discretion. Austin v. Reilly, 606 F.Supp.2d 4, 8 (D.D.C.2009). … Under both the 1972 and 1981 Regulations, “the Board had no formalized scoring system.... The decision to grant parole remained within the discretion of the Board....” Davis v.

American Insurance Association v. Robert L. Clarke, Comptroller of the Currency

865 F.2d 278 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 1989

The Comptroller was obliged, this argument concludes, to defer his final approval pending the Board’s resolution of that issue. Although the Board has exclusive jurisdiction to administer the BHCA, Whitney Nat’l Bank v. … It is perfectly clear, however, that the Comptroller, if he so chooses, may condition any approval on subsequent action by the Board. See, e.g., Gravois Bank v. Board of Governors, 478 F.2d 546, 548 (8th Cir.1973).

Lever Bros. Co. v. District of Columbia. District of Columbia v. Lever Bros. Co

204 F.2d 39 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 26, 1953

In Owens-Illinois Glass Co. v. … Panitz v. District of Columbia, 1941, 74 App.D.C. 284 , 122 F.2d 61 ; Eastman Kodak Co. v. District of Columbia, 1942, 76 U.S.App.D.C. 339 , 131 F.2d 347 ; cf. District of Columbia v.

Tewelde v. Albright

89 F. Supp. 2d 12 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 2000

See Baker v. Stuart Broadcasting, 560 F.2d 389 (8th Cir.1977); Armbruster v. Quinn, 711 F.2d 1332 , (6th Cir.1983)(Same); Trevino v. Celanese Corp., 701 F.2d 397, 404 (5th Cir.1983)(same); Rogers v. … The AEA has its own distinctly independent Board and its day-today activities are managed by a professional staff that reports directly to its Board.

Geo Feick & Sons Co. v. Blair

26 F.2d 540 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 1928

This concession is based on the authority of Eaton v. English & Mersick Co. (C. C. A.) 7 F.(2d) 54 ; Flynn, Collector, v. Hass Bros. (C. C. A.) 20 F.(2d) 510 ; Davidson & Case Lumber Co. v. Motter (D. … of the Board, for lack of proof upon which to base a reversal.

United States v. Wilkins

215 F. App'x 4 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 24, 2007

However, Brown did not plead guilty to perjury in Wilkins’ case, and appellant points to no false statements in Brown’s testimony during his trial. Wilkins seeks to rely on Brady v. … The District Court thus properly held that “there appears no gap between Brown’s statements and the truth.” United States v. Wilkins, No. 92cr389-02, slip op. at 8 (D.D.C.

Harmon v. Brucker

137 F. Supp. 475 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 24, 1956

Plaintiff then applied unsuccessfully to the Army Discharge Review Board and the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records to have the character of his discharge changed from Undesirable on the ground that his services … See Patterson v. Lamb, 1947, 329 U.S. 539, 542 , 67 S.Ct. 448 , 91 L.Ed. 485 . 5 . United States ex rel. Toth v. Quarles, 1955, 350 U.S. 11 , 76 S.Ct. 1 .

Retail Store Employees Union Local No. 400, Retail Clerks International Association, Aflcio v. National Labor Relations Board, C. W. F. Corporation, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. C. W. F. Corporation

458 F.2d 792 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 14, 1972

P 12,418 RETAIL STORE EMPLOYEES UNION LOCAL NO. 400, RETAIL CLERKS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AFLCIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, C. W. F. Corporation, Intervenor. … NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. C. W. F. CORPORATION, Respondent. Nos. 71-1137, 71-1255. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Jan. 24, 1972. Decided Feb. 14, 1972. Mr.

Matter of Wolff

490 A.2d 1118 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1985

See Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 242 , 89 S.Ct. 17 .09, 1711, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969). … Freeman v. Commonwealth, 223 Va. 301 , 288 S.E.2d 461, 465 (1982).

Herman v. American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO

995 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 1997

Brown called the National. 1 The day after Mr. Brown’s call, September 12, 1995, more than 250,000 ballots were sent out to APWU members across the country. On October 5, 1995, Chandler won his election. … See DeArment v. Local 563, 751 F.Supp. 1364 (D.Minn. 1990).

Walter E. Campbell Co., Inc. v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc

48 F. Supp. 3d 53 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 12, 2014

Brown, 980 F.2d 747, 747–48 (D.C. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 26 F. Supp. 2d 74, 77 (D.D.C. 1998), quoting Richardson v. Phillip Morris Inc., 950 F. Supp. 700, 702 (D. Md. 1997); see also Sid Richardson Carbon & Gasoline Co. v.