Case law

People v. Brown

40 Misc. 2d 35 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Jul 17, 1963

Hirschberg v. Orange County Ct., 271 N. Y. 151, 155 ; People v. Redmond, 225 N. Y. 206, 208 ; People v. Grout, No. 1, 166 App. … Not so in criminal law and practice (People v. Redmond, supra; cf. People v. Grout, No. 1, supra, p. 222). It is simple when the rules of the code are religiously followed.

Green v. Brown

3 Barb. 119 · New York Supreme Court · May 9, 1848

Still, in one case, Lawrence v. … And in Feeler v.

Brown v. Brown

97 A.D.3d 568 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 5, 2012

the circumstances” (Matter of Parliman v Labriola, 87 AD3d 1144, 1144 [2011]; see Matter of Nava v Kinsler, 85 AD3d 1186, 1186-1187 [2011]; Trinagel v Boyar, 70 AD3d 816 [2010]). … 898-899 [2012]; Matter of Picado v Doan, 90 AD3d 932 [2011]; White v Mazzella-White, 84 AD3d 1068 [2011]).

Fort v. Brown

46 Barb. 366 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1866

. • In Aveson v. … Ev. § 102 and authorities cited in note 4; Caldwell v. Murphy, 11 N. Y. Rep. 416 ; Brown v. N. Y. Central R. R. Co., 32 id. 603.) There were a number of exceptions to the charge of the court to the jury.

Brown v. Brown

97 A.D.3d 673 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 11, 2012

The Family Court’s determination will not be set aside unless it lacks a substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Wispe v Leandry, 63 AD3d 853 [2009]; Matter of Franklin v Richey, 57 AD3d at 664 ). … (see Matter of Solovay v Solovay, 94 AD3d 898, *675 900 [2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 808 [2012]; Matter of Nell v Nell, 87 AD3d 541, 542-543 [2011]).

People v. Brown

110 A.D. 490 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 3, 1906

Brown' if he was the man who had a fire at Syracuse. He replied yes. I asked him if he was the man who had a fire at Baldwinsville. * * * He .replied yes, bút that -his brother occupied that building. … (Stokes v. People, 53 *495 N. Y. 164 ; People v. Koerner, 154 id. 355 ; People v. Wenner holm, 166 id. 567.)

People v. Brown

60 A.D.3d 962 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 24, 2009

In any event, any error was harmless (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 242 [1975]; People v Bailey, 272 AD2d 621 [2000]). … The defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel is without merit (see People v Tonge, 93 NY2d 838 [1999]; People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713 [1998]).

People v. Brown

17 N.Y.3d 863 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 2011

facts in a light most favorable to the People, there is a valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences from which a rational jury could have found the elements of the crime proved beyond a reasonable doubt” (People v … of the evidence at the Appellate Division and the order of that court “ ‘manifests] a lack of application of that review power’ ... we must reverse and remit for a proper assessment of the weight of the evidence” (People v

Byrd v. Brown

208 A.D.2d 582 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 11, 1994

and sale of real property pursuant to RPAPL article 9, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Burrows, J.), entered November 18, 1992, which granted the motion of the defendant Lila Brown … Socy. v Shakerdge, 49 NY2d 939 ; Simonds v Simonds, 45 NY2d 233, 241 ).

People v. Brown

78 A.D.2d 861 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 3, 1980

matter of policy, requests for brief adjournments to secure witnesses should be granted where the witness is identified, is within the courts jurisdiction and there is a showing of some diligence and good faith (People v … Termination of the proceeding due to the unforeseeable illness of the witness was an inappropriate resolution of the problem (see Hall v Potoker, 49 NY2d 501 ; People v Grant, 63 *862 AD2d 575 ).

Brown v. Harmon

21 Barb. 508 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1856

Brown, S. B. Strong and Rockwell, Justices.]

Brown v. State

45 A.D.3d 15 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 23, 2007

While three individual claimants 7 were found to have been seized (Brown, Sheryl Champen and Cantave), their encounters occurred under materially different circumstances: a street encounter (Brown), a bus-boarding encounter … Sisters of Charity Hosp., 93 NY2d 932, 933 [1999]; Ashley v City of New York, 7 AD3d 742, 743 [2004]; Rossetti v Board of Educ. of Schalmont Cent.

People v. Brown

49 A.D.3d 1345 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 21, 2008

We conclude that, under those circumstances, “defendant could have reasonably believed that his freedom was restricted over and above that of ordinary confinement” (People v Hope, 284 AD2d 560, 562 [2001]; see People v Alls … v Scott, 197 AD2d 936 [1993]).

People v. Brown

46 A.D.3d 1128 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 20, 2007

NY2d at 373-374 ; see also CPL 1.20 [17]; People v Samuels, 49 NY2d 218, 221 [1980]; People v Coleman, 43 NY2d 222, 225 [1977]). … Brisco, 99 NY2d 596, 597 [2003]; see People v Duuvon, 77 NY2d 541, 544 [1991]; People v Starks, 37 AD3d 863, 865 [2007]; People v August, 33 AD3d 1046, 1048-1049 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 878 [2007]).

People v. Brown

141 A.D.3d 535 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 6, 2016

]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Stanley, 99 AD3d 955 [2012]). … Smith, 15 NY3d 669, 673 [2010]; see People v King, 134 AD3d 546, 547 [2015]; People v Rosa, 85 AD3d 587 [2011]).

Minihane v. Brown

2026 NY Slip Op 01505 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 18, 2026

Minihane v Brown ( 2026 NY Slip Op 01505 ) Minihane v Brown 2026 NY Slip Op 01505 Decided on March 18, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law … In August 2014, the defendant, Michael Brown, and Elizabeth Brown executed a promissory note stating: "Whereas [the plaintiff] has leant Michael & Elizabeth Brown Nineteen thousand dollars.

Brown v. Borruso

238 A.D.2d 884 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 25, 1997

Chrysler Corp., 144 AD2d 926, 927 ; Fox v Corning Glass Works, 81 AD2d 826 ). … Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 224 AD2d 674 ; McDonald v Grasso, 220 AD2d 867, 868 ; Narciso v Ford Motor Co., 137 AD2d 508, 509 ).

People v. Brown

266 A.D.2d 838 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 12, 1999

A suspect’s right to remain silent, once unequivocally and unqualifiedly invoked, must be “scrupulously honored” (Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436, 479 ; see, Michigan v Mosley, 423 US 96, 103-104 ; People v Ferro, 63 NY2d 316 … ” (People v Ferro, supra, at 322 ).

Schmidt v. Brown

30 N.Y.S. 68 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1894

In Dwight v. Insurance Co., 103 N. Y. 359 , 8 N. E. 654 , Ruger, C. J., quotes with approbation, and adopts, the rule laid down by the supreme court of the United States in Improvement Co. v. … The learned chief judge also cites, to the same effect, Pleasants v. Fant, 22 Wall. 120 ; Commissioners v. Clark, 94 U. S. 284 ; Griggs v. Houston, 104 U. S. 553 ; and other cases.

People v. Brown

153 A.D.3d 1664 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 29, 2017

Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436, 467 [1966]). … Lunderman, 19 AD3d 1067, 1068-1069 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 830 [2005]; see People v Thomas, 292 AD2d 549, 550 [2002]).