Case law

Johnson v. District of Columbia

612 F. App'x 619 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 18, 2015

See Coming Glass Works v. Brennan, 417 U.S. 188, 195 , 94 S.Ct. 2223 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1 (1974). … See Hamilton v. Geithner, 666 F.3d 1344, 1351 (D.C.Cir.2012); Kersey v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 586 F.3d 13, 16-17 (D.C.Cir.2009).

Hanes v. Pace, Secretary of the Army

203 F.2d 225 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 12, 1953

Since Hanes was not removed from the active list pursuant to the Act of July 29, 1941, he was not granted a hearing before the Board of Review. 6 . United States v. Burchard, 1888, 125 U. … S. 176, 179 , 8 S.Ct. 832 , 31 L.Ed. 662, 663 ; Potts v. United States, 1888, 125 U. S. 173, 175 , 8 S.Ct. 830 , 31 L.Ed. 661, 662 ; McBlair v. United States, 1884, 19 Ct.Cl. 528 ; Runkle v.

Upmc Mercy v. Sebelius

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 10, 2011

SEC v. … Indeed, the Board’s decision is so vague that it is largely unclear what the Board ultimately concluded, let alone why. In such cases, meaningful judicial review is difficult. Benvenuti v. Dep’t of Defense, 587 F.

Titanium Metals Corp. v. Mossinghoff

603 F. Supp. 87 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 28, 1984

Pro-Col Corp. v. Commissioner of Patents, 141 U.S. App.D.C. 142,143, 436 F.2d 296, 297 (1970) (citations omitted). … DeSeversky v. Brenner, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 369 , 370, 424 F.2d 857, 858 (1970) (emphasis the Court’s). “Deference is owed to the findings of the Patent Office.” Puharich v.

American Chemistry Council v. Department of Transportation

468 F.3d 810 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 13, 2006

As materials submitted by the federal review board charged with investigating “hazmat” accidents confirm, these concerns are clearly non-conjectural. … See United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 553 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996); Hunt v. Wash. State Apple Adver.

Mahdi v. Poretsky Management, Inc.

433 A.2d 1085 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 20, 1981

See D.C.Code 1973 §§ 16-1501 et seq., 45-901 et seq.; Lindsey v. Normet, 405 U.S. 56 [ 92 S.Ct. 862 , 31 L.Ed.2d 36 ] (1972). Prior to Brown v. … In Mendes v.

Samuel W. Clark v. Alan W. Payne, as Members of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board for the District of Columbia, Harry Friedman

257 F.2d 655 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 9, 1958

CLARK, Appellant, v. Alan W. PAYNE, et al., as Members of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board for the District of Columbia, Harry Friedman, Appellees. No. 14286. … Counsel, were on the brief, for appellees Payne, and others as members of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board for the District of Columbia. Mr. Morris D. Schwartz, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Philip P.

Thomas E. Bastin v. Federal National Mortgage Association

104 F.3d 1392 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 21, 1997

Plumlee v. Monroe Guaranty Ins. Co., 655 N.E.2d 350, 359 (Ind.Ct.App.1995); Coates v. Jaye, 633 N.E.2d 334, 337 (Ind.Ct.App.1994). … First Chicago Int’l v. United *1396 Exchange Co., Ltd., 836 F.2d 1375, 1380 (D.C.Cir.1988) (quoting Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)).

National Labor Relations Board v. Maywood Plant of Grede Plastics, a Division of Grede Foundries, Inc., Maywood Plant of Grede Plastics, a Division of Grede Foundries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Plastic Workers Union, Local 18, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

628 F.2d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 3, 1980

P 12,170 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. MAYWOOD PLANT OF GREDE PLASTICS, A Division of Grede Foundries, Inc., Respondent. … Cir. 1971); NLRB v.

McGrady v. Winter

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 2009

Landgraf v. USI Film Prods., 511 U.S. 244, 280 (1994). … Dep’t of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass’n, 532 U.S. 1, 8-9 (2001) (quoting NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132, 150 (1975) (internal quotation marks omitted)); see also Public Citizen, Inc. v.

Palisades Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission

368 A.2d 1143 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1977

Taylor, individually, had previously sought a variance before the Board of Zoning Adjustment, Taylor v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjust., D.C.App., 308 A.2d 230 (1973). … Woodridge Nursery School v. Jessup, D.C.App., 269 A.2d 199 , 202 n. 14 (1970). 7 . Allen v.

Woodruff v. McPhie

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 23, 2009

Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957). … Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A., 534 U.S. 506, 514 (2002) (quoting Hishon v. King & Spalding, 467 U.S. 69, 73 (1984)).

Bell v. Jones

523 A.2d 982 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1987

Browning v. Maurice B. … for the purpose of securing an FHA loan); Browning v.

Simpson v. Reno

902 F. Supp. 254 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 13, 1995

Brown v. Popular Mechanics, 37 F.3d 1503 (8th Cir.1994). … Plaintiff Brown alleges only that he disagrees with the application of the law of defamation by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.

In re Klayman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 2022

V. Other Disciplinary Proceedings Mr. … See PHCDC1, LLC v.

Davidson v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 8, 2010

See Brown, 495 F. … Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Taylor v. James

85 A.2d 62 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 1951

Brown v. Rudberg, 84 U.S.App.D.C. 221 , 171 F.2d 831 ; Schaff v. R. W. Claxton, Inc., 79 U.S.App.D.C. 207 , 144 F.2d 532 ; Champ v. Atkins, 76 U.S.App.D.C. 15 , 128 F.2d 601 ; Germaine v. … Brown v. Haas, D.C.Mun.App., 72 A.2d 39 . As in almost all civil cases, our decision must be limited to the issues and questions presented at the trial.

Coburn v. McHugh

77 F. Supp. 3d 24 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 30, 2014

Cone v. Caldera, 223 F.3d 789, 793 (D.C.Cir.2000) (quoting Kreis v. … Epstein v. Geren, 539 F.Supp.2d 267, 275 (D.D.C.2008); see Doyle v.

International Underwriters, Inc. v. Boyle

365 A.2d 779 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1976

As noted supra, Boyle learned of Connery’s plan approximately two months before the NAIRE executive board was scheduled to meet. … Washington Post Co. v. Keogh, supra, 125 U.S.App.D.C. at 34 , 365 F.2d at 967 . See also White Motor Co. v. United States, 372 U.S. 253, 259 , 83 S.Ct. 696 , 9 L.Ed.2d 738 (1963); Poller v.

Glenn Munsey v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission, Smitty Baker Coal Co., Inc., Intervenors

595 F.2d 735 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 29, 1978

Although there is authority to suggest that the Board’s actions would be entirely proper in any circumstances, see Fly v. Heitmeyer, 309 U.S. 146 , 60 S.Ct. 443 , 84 L.Ed. 664 (1940); FCC v. … See Baker v.