Case law

City of Portland v. Marc A. Lesperance

2025 ME 43 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 20, 2025

Co. v. … In re Ops. of the Justs., 70 Me. 560, 565-66 (1880); Brown v. Lunt, 37 Me. 423, 428 (1854); Hooper v. Goodwin, 48 Me. 79, 80 (1861); Stuart v. Ellsworth, 105 Me. 523, 527, 75 A. 59, 61 (1909).

Aquafortis Associates, LLC v. Maine Board of Environmental Protection

Superior Court of Maine · Sep 28, 2020

AQF timely appealed the transfer to the Maine Board of Environmental Protection ("BEP"). … or commissioner or to otherwise violate the terms of the order of the board or commissioner

Brown v. State of Maine, Dep't of Human Servs.

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 12, 2001

BROWN, III, Petitioner Vv. … In arguing that the hearing officer was correct, the Department points to two cases from other jurisdictions, Smith v. Smith, 651 P.2d 1290 (Az. App. 1982) and Hinckley v. Hinckley, 812 P.2d 907 (Wyo. 1991).

Brown v. State of Maine, Dep't of Human Servs.

Superior Court of Maine · Aug 30, 2000

AP-00-20 DM REV ~ 6/80/2020 JAMES BROWN, Petitioner v. . DECISION AND ORDER STATE OF MAINE, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Pode Respondent... … Brown relies on Wood v. Wood, 407 A.2d 282, 287 (Me. 1979) for the proposition that the common law allows exceptions to this general rule against retroactive modification of support orders.

Narowetz v. State of Maine Board of Dental Practice

Superior Court of Maine · Apr 21, 2020

Seider v. Board of Examiners of Psychologists , 2000 ME 206, ~ 8, 762 A.2d 551 quoting CWCO, Inc. v. … In Schaffer v. State Board of Veterinary Medicine, 143 Ga.

City of Augusta v. Attorney General

2008 Me. 51 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 18, 2008

Id.; see MP Assocs. v. … Marvin cites to Porter v.

Metcalf v. Taylor

36 Me. 28 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1853

The plaintiff having testified as a witness in the case of Hatch v. Taylor et als., that testimony by the agreement becomes evidence in his own case. … The payment and acceptance of the price of a vessel is sufficient to complete the sale between the seller and purchaser, without any bill of sale or other written instrument, Ludwig v. Fuller, 17 Maine, 162; Lyman v.

State v. McMahan

2000 Me. 200 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 13, 2000

See State v. Sullivan, 1997 ME 71, ¶ 6 , 695 A.2d 115, 117 ; State v. … Id. at 682 . [¶ 16] In Walter v.

The Frank Brainerd

3 F.2d 664 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 16, 1925

C.) 214 F. 131, 132 ; Petrie v. Steam Tug Coal Bluff (D. C.) 3 F. 531 ; The Benton, 3 Fed. Cas. 256 , No. 1,334; The Queen of St. Johns (C. C.) 31 F. 24 . … C.) 30 F. 789, 791 , in which case Judge Addison Brown said: “The evidence shows that in this ease nothing more than a formal arrest of the vessel tipon the original libel was desired, and that, by direction of the libelant

State v. Bailey

2012 Me. 55 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 12, 2012

In State v. … Specifically, the court applied the factors identified in Brown v.

Maine Ass'n of Health Plans v. Superintendent of Insurance

923 A.2d 918 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 31, 2007

Brown, Esq. (orally), Brown & Burke, Portland, Joseph P. Ditre, Esq., Augusta, (for Consumers for Affordable Health Care Coalition), for defendants. … See Kosalka v.

NASS v. MAINE BOARD OF LICENSURE IN MEDICINE

District Court, D. Maine · Jul 24, 2024

Comm’n v. … See Fleming v.

Edwards v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.

48 Me. 379 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1860

In Maxwell v. Brown, 39 Maine, 98, the coal was to be delivered at Portland, the vessel .in which it was shipped was wrecked, and the coal never arrived at Portland. … In Randeau v. Wyatt, (2 H. Bl., 63,) Lord Loughborough said, the case of Towers v.

Chesley v. Holmes

40 Me. 536 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1885

Purchase v. Tiffany, 1 Greenl. 219. In the deeds of Samuel Brown, no reference is made to any plan, or to the survey of Greenwood, or any other person. … The case is not analagous to that of Allen v. Allen, relied upon by the demandant, in which no question was made touching the plan referred to in the deed; but it is more like that of Worthington v.

Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court

159 Me. 410 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 23, 1963

Ct. 1101 ; Gallagher v. Crown Kosher Super Mkt. (1961), 366 U. S. 617 , 81 S. Ct. 1122 ; Two Guys v. McGinley (1961), 366 U. S. 582 , 81 S. Ct. 1135 ; Braunfeld v. Brown (1961), 366 U. S. 599 , 81 S. Ct. 1144 . … See Unemployment Com. v. Androscoggin, 137 Me. 154, 163 .

Central Maine General Hospital v. Carter

125 Me. 191 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 3, 1926

Kendall, 121 Mass., 528 ; Troy Academy v. Nelson, 24 Vt., 189 ; Barnett Adm. v. The Franklin College, 10 Ind., App. 103; Collier v. Baptist Education, 47 Ky., 68 ; Albert Lea College v. Brown Admr., 60 L. R. … Acts of which we think the jury from all the evidence were warranted in inferring that the other members of the Board of Directors, including Mr.

MCBREAIRTY v. MILLER

District Court, D. Maine · Apr 26, 2023

Heffron v. … In Ridley v.

Fournier v. Aetna, Inc.

899 A.2d 787 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 16, 2006

DISCUSSION [¶ 5] We accord deference to decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board addressing whether an injury is compensable pursuant to the Act. Cox v. Coastal Prods. … Corp., 308 A.2d 860, 863 (Me.1973) ("special hazard” exception applies when the risks of employment carry over after the employee has entered the public way); Brown v. Palmer Constr.

State v. Robinson

803 A.2d 452 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 15, 2002

State v. Kalex, 2002 ME 26, ¶ 10 , 789 A.2d 1286, 1289 . A. … State v. Warren, 1998 ME 136, ¶ 9 , 711 A.2d 851, 855 . This interest, however, “ ‘is neither absolute nor paramount,’ ” id. (quoting State v.

Blodgett v. School Administrative District 73

289 A.2d 407 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 31, 1972

In Eaton v. … in such form as the board shall determine. * * * The board shall * .‘ issue a certificate of organization * * *. * * * The issuance of such certificate by the board shall be conclusive evidence of the lawful organization