Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

1.37s

  • Fort Dearborn Company v. NLRB

    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 17, 2016

    After the appointments of two Board Members were invalidated, see NLRB v. Noel Canning, 134 S. … Although the court will defer to the Board’s interpretation of the Act, Stanford Hosp. & Clinics v. NLRB, 325 F.3d 334, 337 (D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harris v. Bessent

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 2025

    In Sampson v. … a Board member etc.” 8 Id. at 980.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mitchell v. D.C. Department of Employment Services

    50 A.3d 453 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 2012

    Children’s Defense Fund v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 726 A.2d 1242, 1247 (D.C.1999). … Mitchell relies — Ceco Steel, Inc. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 566 A.2d 1062 (D.C.1989), and Sibley Mem’l Hosp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dali v. Uscis Headquarters

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 17, 2026

    Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Additionally, “each allegation [in a pleading] must be simple, concise, and direct[,]” Fed. R. Civ. … See Brown, 75 F.R.D. at 499 (collecting cases) (citation omitted).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kingston Constructors, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

    930 F. Supp. 651 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 7, 1996

    See Granite-Groves v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 845 F.2d 330, 333 (D.C.Cir.1988). … See, e.g., Rattigan v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Rodriguez v. Editor in Chief

    285 F. App'x 756 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 2, 2008

    See Younger v. … Brown v. Dist. of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1285-86 (D.C.Cir.2008); see also Stanton v. Dist. of Col.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Rubicon Advisors, LLC

    254 F. Supp. 3d 245 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2017

    United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 800 F. … (citing Brown v. Carr, 503 A.2d 1241, 1247 (D.C. 1986))).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Kim v. Brownlee

    344 F. Supp. 2d 758 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 15, 2004

    See Saunders v. White, 191 F.Supp.2d 95, 120 (D.D.C.2002). … V.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • New LifeCare Hospitals v. Xavier Becerra

    7 F.4th 1215 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 10, 2021

    See Thomas Jefferson Univ. v. … Hosp. of Monterey Peninsula v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Allen v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

    784 F. Supp. 906 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 14, 1992

    See Rastall v. CSX Corp., 696 F.Supp. 683, 684 (D.D.C.1988); see also Air Line Dispatchers Ass’n v. National Mediation Board, 189 F.2d 685 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 849 , 72 S.Ct. 77 , 96 L.Ed. 641 (1951). … In Rastall v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Grant Medical Center v. Burwell

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 1, 2016

    (Board), and the Board consolidated the appeals. … Johnson, 969 F.2d at 1091; see also id. at 1092 (comparing nonacquiescence to Governor Orval Faubus’ defiance of Brown v. Bd. of Education, 373 U.S. 493 (1954), at Little Rock) (citing Lopez, 725 F.2d. at 1497).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lawson v. United States

    596 A.2d 504 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 21, 1991

    Remmer v. United States, 347 U.S. 227, 230 , 74 S.Ct. 450, 451 , 98 L.Ed. 654 (1954). After taking testimony both from Mr. Brown and other witnesses, the court found that Mr. … Brown had not seen any gambling at the after-hours establishment and that his judgment was not affected. The court also credited Brown’s statement that he did not mention this chance meeting to other jurors.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Association of Administrative Law Judges, Inc. v. Heckler

    594 F. Supp. 1132 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 10, 1984

    See generally, Butz v. Economou, 438 U.S. 478, 513-14 , 98 S.Ct. 2894, 2914-15 , 57 L.Ed.2d 895 (1978); Ramspeck v. … See Baker v. Heckler, 730 F.2d at 1150 .

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • United States v. Pettiford

    293 F. Supp. 2d 22 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 2003

    In Texas v. … See United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Harris Lindsey

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 2020

    Co. v. Barry Inn Realty, Inc., 130 F. … As the Board also noted, case law and D.C. Bar ethics opinions state that an attorney to the fiduciary of an estate does not have a fiduciary relationship with the estate. 14 14 See Hopkins v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dyson v. Hagel

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 2, 2014

    Smith v. Dalton, 971 F. Supp. 1, 3 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing Mondy v. Sec’y of the Army, 845 F.2d 1051, 1057 (D.C. Cir. 1988)). … DATE: July 2, 2014 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bors v. Allen

    607 F. Supp. 2d 204 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 15, 2009

    Cobell v. Norton, 391 F.3d *210 251, 258 (D.C.Cir.2004). … Qualls v. Rumsfeld, 357 F.Supp.2d 274, 279 (D.D.C.2005) (citing Bois v. Marsh, 801 F.2d 462 , 468 (D.C.Cir.1986)).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Ramos v. United States Department of Justice

    682 F. Supp. 2d 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 21, 2010

    INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the court on the pro se plaintiffs motion for recusal and motion to vacate. 1 The plaintiff brought suit challenging the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“the Board”) to … Comm’ns Co. v. Am. Tel. & Tel.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Owens-Illinois Glass Co. v. District of Columbia. District of Columbia v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co

    204 F.2d 29 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 26, 1953

    Mueller Brass Co. v. … The case of District of Columbia v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Federal Trade Commission v. Manager, Retail Credit Company, Miami Branch Office

    515 F.2d 988 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 1975

    Browning, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 292 , 295 n. 7, 435 F.2d 96 , 99 n. 7 (1970). Claims of secrecy of subpoenaed information have generally proved no barrier to discovery by the FTC. FTC v. … See generally Automatic Canteen Co. v.

    Cited 67 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.